Slashdot Mirror


Running Mac OS X Panther

sympleko (Matthew Leingang) writes with his review of Running Mac OS X Panther, by James Duncan Davidson. "The Macintosh has come a long way in twenty-plus years. Much has been said of Mac OS X being the perfect union of a rock-solid operating system with a beautiful and functional user interface. Since the iMac, Apple's market share has been steadily increasing, and since OS X, Unix users have been making the switch. My last computer was a dual-boot box that I kept finding excuses to keep from booting to Windows. My PowerBook is literally the best of both worlds. I can run the older unix-based apps I need to for work, and use Microsoft programs and play fancy games when I want. It's also essentially two different computers. This book is about using that second computer, the workhorse behind the scenes." Read on for the rest. Running Mac OS X Panther author James Duncan Davidson pages 306 publisher O'Reilly rating 9 reviewer Matthew Leingang ISBN 0596005008 summary Managing your Mac as a unix box

The book fills a certain niche very well. It is not the missing manual to the iApps or a list of Finder tricks. It's not a primer on Unix for people used to GUIs and Macs (that's Learning Unix for Mac OS X Panther , also from O'Reilly). This book is for users who have administered a machine or network before and want to get the absolute most out of their Mac. It's also useful for connecting your Mac to a network seamlessly. But it's complicated and technical enough if you're the kind of Mac user who doesn't have the Terminal on your dock you might be intimidated. That may not include most slashdot readers, but it's worth mentioning because part of the Mac ideology is that it works beautifully with little trouble. The Unix ideology, however, is also represented: if want to tweak it, you can.

The author illustrates both interfaces to the operating system throughout the book. There are Macintosh applications to access all kinds of system information, whether it's users and groups, preferences, system logs, or services. For those who love Unix and the command line, just about anything you can do with the GUI you can do with the CLI. This makes a nice two-tiered approach to anything you'll want to do. The GUI is fast and easy to learn, but some things (particularly automated tasks) really need to be done on the command line.

The book is written well, and if you happen to be sitting next to your computer while reading it, you'll be constantly torn between the two. There are lots of things you'll want to try right away.

Part I: Getting Started

This part has a charming history of the Macintosh, from the toaster to Panther, complete with snapshots (my favorite parts of these are the disk usage indicators: System Folder: 152K in folder, 167K available.) It's fun to read and discover where on the time line you came into the fold.

Here also is a basic layout of the filesystem, containing parts used by the more Macintosh-y side and the more Unix-y side. For instance, there are several directories (um, folders) called Library; these contain information which might be in an include, share, etc, or lib directory. Better put, these contain supplemental Mac-app-related, non-user data. For Unix applications, the /usr, /var, /bin, /sbin, /etc, are all there.

Of course, there are top-level places to store things, or user-level locations for essentially the same kind of data (applications, preferences, documentation). This is the concept of filesystem domains, which additionally include network and system domains. The whole idea is to allow customization to ordinary users without giving up system integrity and preventing all users from unintentionally corrupting things.

If you haven't used the CLI on the Mac before, the author gives a basic introduction to Terminal.app. Terminal by default uses the bash shell, but there are number of ways to change that if you want. Several text editors are available for editing through the terminal, but unfortunately, the author doesn't talk much about them. True, pico is self-explanatory and vi and emacs users will already have their followers, but a little more than how to exit these programs if they start accidentally (while that's quite useful information) would have been helpful.

There's important extra structure to Mac files that can be (accidentally or intentionally) unlinked on the Unix side. There are commands like ditto, CpMac and MvMac which take care of the important stuff and do exactly what their GUI counterparts do (and more than mv and cp). Also, there's open which is the analog of double-clicking (either apps or docs), and osascript which lets you write and run AppleScript scripts on the fly. More could have been said here about the differences between Mac files and Unix files. What of the resource fork?

Part II: Essentials

This is where the book's meat is. There is first a blow-by-blow account of what happens when you turn on your Mac. If you are interested in seeing all the gory details, you can always hold down Propeller-V during startup and see the BSD diagnostics (even if you don't know what these mean, it's nice to know some progress is being made. Though I love the taste of Mac Kool-aid, I often worry what's going on while that dial is spinning). You can change how the Mac boots by updating (at your peril, as usual) the Open Firmware settings on the chip with nvram. One nice bit of customization from Bell-and-Whistle Land: the graphic shown at boot time is in /System/Library/CoreServices/SystemStarter/QuartzDisplay.bundle/Resources/BootPanel.pdf. The /etc/hostconfig file has Unix-style host configuration information, such as what services get turned on.

Creating your own startup items is relatively easy; it's a matter of putting a directory, shell script, and plist file in /Library/StartupItems. You can also customize what happens after a successful startup. You can present a login window, auto-login as a specific user, or even allow dropping down to console login.

The larger and more powerful a computer gets, the more people want or need to use it, and the more important it is to make sure each user area remains separate. At the Mac lab at which I worked during college in the early nineties, we used RevRDist to make sure every computer in the lab mirrored one with just the right software, fonts, and windows in the right place. The Mac from which we mirrored was locked in the office, not to be touched. Now there are much easier ways to do this without wasting a computer.

It's easy to create and manage users using the the Accounts preference panel. The root user exists, but is essentially not needed. The person who installs the operating system becomes an administrative user, and can bestow that privilege on other users. On the command line, all administrative tasks can be done with sudo, which requires authentication as an administrative user to run, but which contains a slight memory so that passwords don't need to be typed at every command. Although it's discouraged, you can allow the root user to log in.

With the several filesystem domains, each user can manage his or her own preferences. Each application allows access to its own preferences, or they can be taken care of from the command line with the defaults utility. GUI means it's easy to do what you want without knowing exactly what setting to change; CLI means you can automate it easily.

Another important aspect of a multi-user system is in permissions. Like in any good unix, in Mac OS X files have permissions attached to them indicating whether the owner, other users in the owner's group, or all users are allowed to see, edit, or run them. This can be managed through the Finder (with the Get Info menu command), or with the command line with chmod.

Several applications in the /Applications/Utilities folder allow you to keep track of what's running on your Mac. The author demonstrates these:

  • System Profile, which shows information about your system's hardware and software. You can use this to check out who made your hard drive and how much RAM you have. Also, every application installed in /Applications is registered here, so you can easily see what versions of which are there.
  • Console is another great utility for monitoring your applications. It collects log files from /Library/Logs, /var/log, and ~/Library/Log in a tree for browsing. You can filter views of these logs easily, making this a little more pleasant than tail -f.
  • To monitor processes themselves you can use Activity Monitor. Think of it as top on Macintosh Steroids. You can inspect processes to try and figure out what they're doing or kill them if they've stopped accepting input. For super users and developers, you can sample processes to figure out their inner workings. There is probably FMTYEWTK about processes, but it's good know it's there.
  • To terminate processes, there's the Force Quit command from the Apple menu, or you can do it through Activity Monitor, or there's good old-fashioned kill.

At the core of the Mac filesystem lies, of course, the filesystem. The Mac OS X Extended Filesystem (HFS+) is powerful yet friendly. It's case-preserving and case-insensitive. The latter means that README and Readme are the same file, but the former means that your original name for the file will be kept without enforcement of case usage. So if you want to call it ReAdMe, that's oK, too.

One of the most powerful features of HFS+ is journaling. This means every change to the file system is kept track of in the event of a system crash. This causes a slight overhead but pays benefits in automatic recovery from crashes without having to run fsck (or be scolded by your computer for its own crash). Fragmentation is also handled smartly; files smaller than 20MB are moved so as to have less than 8 fragments.

Lots of other disk-related activities are covered, including:

  • how to mount filesystems of other types, including CDs and DVDs, Apple Filing Protocol, Samba, NFS, WebDAV and FTP;
  • The Disk Utility application and its CLI cousin diskutil which do as much as you would want and more with a disk utility. You can check, repair, partition, erase and format any disks. You can even obliterate data by writing over it eight times with random data. Take that, NSA!
  • disk images, which are like 21st century tarballs. A disk image contains not only data but its own filesystem, and are mounted onto the user's filesystem just like disks. In addition, disk images can be encrypted to restrict access without a password.

Part III: Advanced Topics

The further along in the book, the less useful it gets. That speaks not the author's skill of exposition or choice of subject matter, but simply confidence in the Mac and the knowledge that I didn't need to know it. For the user administering a single machine, there's no real need to grok the inner workings of Open Directory: it just works. Printing, network services: it all just works. That's good news for Mac users. But it's also good that all this information is available if you really do want to tweak default behavior or configure something that isn't working as it should.

I talked about this book with the systems administrator in my department, and he mentioned that my statements in the previous paragraph are somewhat simplistic. According to him, it was a hard task to have public Mac workstations which mounted home directories from a central Unix computer, and allowed users to have their own preferences and user data (including Dock setups) live in their Unix accounts. Apparently the book that has all the information about networking, warts and all, hasn't been written yet. This book is as good as it gets, so far.

To summarize this part of the book: Open Directory has nothing to do with the filesystem directory. Instead, it's the central location of all authentication information. At one time Unix maintained user information in flat files such as /etc/passwd and /etc/group; with the advent of larger networks that regime has been largely replaced. Open Directory is a liaison between BSD's Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAMs) and Mac's Directory Services on the local end, and LDAP, Rendevous, Kerberos, etc., on the network end. Open Directory can talk to Active Directory as well, to allow authentication across Windows and Mac platforms. Through network (shared domain) authentication, users can log in on networked machines while their names and passwords are stored on a central server. The Directory Access Utility is the tool for this.

NetInfo is the database behind Open Directory. As usual, there are two ways to manage Netinfo information; the GUI NetInfo Manager, and nicl on the command line.

Mac OS X uses CUPS (Common Unix Printing Service) to configure and access printing. The printing chapter shows how to add and manage printers using the Printer Setup Utility, and how to customize jobs with the various settings in the standard print dialog. Like I said, though, printing is much easier than it sounds from this chapter. Rendezvous and Open Directory find the printers you're allowed to print on; you click Print and go.

Networking and network services are also covered here. The author shows not only the theory behind networking, but the settings which allow one computer on a network to find another on another network through the internet. Once this is accomplished, a number of services can be deployed, from FTP to remote login to a personal web site.

Appendices

There's some useful stuff in the back, including how to install Panther from scratch (but especially what needs to be backed up before you do so!), all those boot key combos you can never remember, and a whole list of other resources, be they books, magazines, web sites, or mailing lists.

Check out this book if you want to learn the gory details of Mac OS X's core. It's short on gimmicks but long on information.

You can purchase Running Mac OS X Panther from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews. To see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

60 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. Is your Mac OS X Panther running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then you better go catch it!

    1. Re:Is your Mac OS X Panther running? by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heed this advice. My OS X Panther got loose and even though the little slut was only out for one night and next thing you know I have a litter of iPods on my hands.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Is your Mac OS X Panther running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If that's true, I'd be pimping her out all the time. Or are you the guy running the Free iPod program?

    3. Re:Is your Mac OS X Panther running? by jrockway · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude. iPods are like $300 each! Quit-yer-bitchin' and sell 'em on eBay :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:Is your Mac OS X Panther running? by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

      For the love of god, will no one think of the illegitimate little baby iPods!!!

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    5. Re:Is your Mac OS X Panther running? by kevcol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Those things happen when you go out on Safari.

  2. Tiger is just around the corner... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tiger, the next version of the MacOS, is being polished right now. At Mac Expo London last week, Apple was giving demos of the new OS and had machines where you could get a hands-on taste of some of the new features, like video conferencing, Safari RSS, etc.

    Impressive doesn't do it justice: if it lives up to its billing then it'll be nothing short of the best desktop OS ever. And this coming from a dedicated Windows and Linux user.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Tiger is just around the corner... by fussili · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually Video Conferencing using iChat has been around for a long while (I make use of it every day talking to relatives around the globe who although may not be the most technoliterate are easily capable of using iChat). The big difference in Tiger is that you can Video Multiconference - ie have a multi user video conference.

      The GUI displays it as a sort of black marble table affair with beautiful reflections and an elegance which is breathtaking - not to mention the fact that using the H.264 codec they can render massive resolution video feeds from 3 other users and the feed from your own iSight/DVcam.

      Check it out

    2. Re:Tiger is just around the corner... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is possible to be committed to more than one thing at a time. It might be a novel concept to you, but it's not to most people.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  3. bn.com? by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Informative

    Allow me to save you 43% off the listed bn.com price (I hope /. at least gets a cut at that price).

    The awesome Bookpool has it for $22.75.

  4. Re:A Tiger by any other name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are they going to call it after Tiger? My assumption is Lion, but beyond that...I mean, Ocelot? Serval?? Bobcat???

  5. "best of both worlds" by asv108 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "My PowerBook is literally the best of both worlds. I can run the older unix-based apps I need to for work, and use Microsoft programs and play fancy games when I want."

    That goes for my thinkpad running Linux too. I can run microsoft programs, I don't but I could, and play "fancy games." While the game collection for OSX and Linux is increasing, its usually older games. I really don't find gaming enjoyable on a laptop anyway. My powermac G5 is a nice gaming machine with the addition of a sensible mouse. Now all I need to do is wait for Doom3 and Half Life 2. By the time they come out, my one year Apple warranty will have expired.

    1. Re:"best of both worlds" by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are a gamer, pure and hard, truly a Mac isn't the computer of choice. That's not why people use Mac or play games on them. Mac users usually want the option of running a few games, they will buy their computer for video editing, audio engineering, media content creation and management, biochemistry, genomics... that sort of thing, if it can also play games... yay!

    2. Re:"best of both worlds" by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2

      Don't buy a Mac if you're a gamer. Buy a Mac when you want to get work done.

      Buy a Windows machine to play games - they're ultimately cheaper and support more of the stuff you will undoubtedly like to play.

      If that changes in the future, great. Otherwise, my plan is to install FreeBSD for utility servers, use a Mac as a UNIX workstation and play games on a Windows box.

      If you can't afford that, perhaps being choosy isn't something you should be doing. I know I wasn't when I couldn't afford it.

  6. Excellent free resource... by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mac OS X Hints is a great free resource for those wanting to get under the hood of OS X. They have stuff like Applescripts for automation, shareware reviews, and command line stuff. Bookmark it!

    1. Re:Excellent free resource... by mirko · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also visit MacFixItand XLR8YourMac...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  7. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You say in your journal that your karma needs to go up. Well, it won't with such stupid comments. Apple has created a very good OS based on Unix, and applied their GUI and usability philosophy to it.

  8. Re:"older" vs "Microsoft"? by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My interpretation of this was that the writer was talking about things like vi, emacs, lynx, etc... Many of the most powerful programs that a lot of people associate with unix predate the MS office suite significantly.

    You're right, "older" didn't need to be said, but I'd hardly call it "silly"

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  9. RISC vs CISC? by copponex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have an emachines laptop that includes an Athlon64, 512MB RAM and an ATI 9600 Mobile. I bought a 15" AlBook with an ATI 9700/128MB RAM.

    Yet, WoW runs faster on my emachines laptop, without a doubt. And on the forums I've heard that people are getting less framerates than my x86 laptop while running Dual 2.5 G5s with 6800 Ultra cards.

    My question is, where's the bottleneck? Is it poor optimization for PPC? Or driver design? Or simply RISC vs CISC?

    I was going to throw YellowDog on the AlBook because I love the hardware, but YD4 still doesn't have a sleep function, which is the same problem I have on the emachines. I've since gone back to fedora on the x86 and the difference in opening programs, scrolling, etc, is huge. Anyone out there with anecdotes on YellowDog vs OS X?

    1. Re:RISC vs CISC? by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone out there with anecdotes on YellowDog vs OS X?

      I stopped running linux on my macs at work for one simple reason. Make a list of the activities you plan to do under linux, that you couldn't do under OS X. Now, make a list of things you can do under OS X and can't do under linux. Chances are, you'll end up sacrificing a bunch of features so you can simply say "I'm running linux". There's no motive.

      Hell, if you're a X11 purist you can even make it so you can toggle your OS X install between Aqua and XDarwin as your default environment. ...but once again, there's not much reason to do this as you mostly just lose functionality. Mac's have the advantage of being able to use OS X, why not do it?

    2. Re:RISC vs CISC? by Llywelyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      " Athlon64, 512MB RAM and an ATI 9600 Mobile. I bought a 15" AlBook with an ATI 9700/128MB RAM."

      128 MB with WoW *and* MacOS X? You should have at *least* 512 MB, preferably more.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    3. Re:RISC vs CISC? by topham · · Score: 4, Informative


      The bottleneck is OpenGL on the Mac.

      Check out www.x-plane.com and you'll see mentioned of the author having some issues with really low frame-rate on his new scenery for version 8 of X-plane. (The scenery is brutal. But it runs on a PC, and kills a Dual processor G5.).

      I looked into it a bit and it looks like Apple's implementation allocates too much memory and causes thrashing (in memory) if the Display Lists are too large. I suspect it is the same reason iD hasn't released Doom III for the Mac, simply put the current OpenGL code cannot push that much data.

    4. Re:RISC vs CISC? by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suspect it is the same reason iD hasn't released Doom III for the Mac, simply put the current OpenGL code cannot push that much data

      iD hasn't released Doom III for the Mac yet because Aspyr is. Why iD isn't doing there own port though, is beyond me.

  10. Max OS X is great, but... by samekt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a long time PC user, dual booting Windows and Linux. Although I am not easily influenced by advertisements, Slashdot is doing a very good job convincing me to switch.

    I know that Mac OS X is a great OS. I think I know the most important advantages of switching. What is holding me back, however, is the fact that no-one is talking about the disadvantages of doing so.

    I know that there are certain applications which do not exist on Mac OS X. But I can do my research on that topic. What truly bothers me is that there might be things I do not expect to be missing, e.g. I recently learned that iBooks do not support extended desktop, or that Quicktime does not play fullscreen.

    So I have a question to y'all switchers. Are there any annoyances you encountered when switching from Windows or Linux? Something unexpected?

    1. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by fussili · · Score: 2, Informative

      erm, Quicktime not play fullscreen?

      Command-F : Fullscreen

      That's also accessible via the 'Movie' menubar

      You can also choose "present on screen" from the same menu.

    2. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by qloops · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fullscreen QuickTime playback is supported by the Pro (pay-for) version of the QuickTime Player application on both Mac and Windows platforms. It has always bugged me that they split QuickTime into 2 versions a number of years ago, the free one having most of the functionality disabled. Video Lan Client http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ is a very good program, that offers a lot of features Quicktime's free version does not.

    3. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by kiddailey · · Score: 4, Informative


      Actually, Quicktime definitely does do fullscreen. What doesn't is the free version of Apple's Quicktime player - though for $25 US you get fullscreen and a lot more handy features.

      There are many free alternatives though -- such as, but not limited to MPlayer and VideoLAN which are two very fine players.

      As far as missing applications, I've had yet to be unable to find alternatives to what I use in the PC world, so without further specific examples, you won't get much help. In fact, even if there is a program only available for PC, VirtualPC or Remote Desktop Connection Client solves that problem completely for me.

      I've always used Win and Mac OS (since Win3.1 and OS 7 anyway) and the only major annoyance on the OS X side is when I keep hitting CONTROL+C to copy on my Mac after working on the Windows box for prolonged periods of time.

      I won't even bother to list all my annoyances with Windows :) ... IMO, it just feels like a clumsy OS in comparison.

    4. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by jackelfish · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been using a mac since OS 6 was first introduced. I currently own an iBook G4 and while it does not support an extended desktop there is a firmware hack that will provide you with this capability if you have a vid card with enough RAM.

      That said I do have 2 pcs at home, one running windows XP and the other running Debian. For some of the more obvious annoyances between my mac and windows pc (fink and apple's X11 actually give me most of the capabilities of my Debian box):
      1) many websites (large corporations, including many banks) are optimized for windows and will not display properly in Safari or IE for mac (no longer supported by Microsoft). This can be overcome if you happen to run Microsoft's Virtual PC, which will run XP and therefore a compatible IE.
      2)I do not like iPhoto's categorizing my digital photos. I have yet to find a good program for the mac (I use Firehand Ember on my PC)
      3)Which brings me to another point, there is a lot more shareware out there for Windows (however, if you are proficient with Unix, many of these types of applications have already been written for Unix and can be compiled on OS X given a little time).
      4)If you need to have all the shiny new software out there, then the mac is not for you. An example is Gmail. It only recently began supporting Safari and there is still no Gmail notifier for OS X (although there are some nifty Gmail widgets out there for Konfabulator).
      5)Upgrading is more often than not a problem. Don't think that you can head off to CompUSA and buy a new video card for your new G5 tower. Memory is really the only readily upgradeable component in an apple (and this is only a recent addition). Many apples leave you stuck with what you bought (I do not really see this as a big problem as I like to upgrade to a completely new system every 2 years or so anyways).
      6)People will salivate all over your new computer. So if you have OCD don't buy a new mac.

      If you are heavy into windows and need to use Microsoft Access or other windows only apps extensively, don't think that virtual PC will be your savior if you buy a mac. In this case stick with Windows for these things. However, if you are just waffling because you can not think of what you "might" be missing, just jump in and go buy a new 1.33GHz iBook, you will not be disappointed. I myself will always use a macintosh, not being a PC gamer and now that I have the command line and X11 I may never use anything else.

      --
      "When Nature Calls We All Shall Drown" Johan Edlund
    5. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Informative
      Reliance on the mouse is a big issue to me.

      Hit command (the apple button)-tab to cycle through programs and command-tilde (~) to cycle through windows in a particular program. Command and the direction of an arrow left, right up or down will bring you to the end of lines, right and left, or the end of a field, up or down. That might be part of the "strange tangle" you describe, but I've found that I don't have to take my hands off the keyboard often.

    6. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That command never appeared until I got the cracked version of Quicktime.

      When you first ran it, QuickTime would have come up with a "sales pitch" dialog claiming one of the benefits of buying QuickTime Pro was to be able to play fullscreen. I believe that should be a standard feature, but apparently the QuickTime Pro $30 keys sell quite well.

      typical Apple bonehead mistakes

      People around here really do have issues with Apple don't they.

      Quicktime program itself is really ugly and hard to use.

      It has a nice brushed metal interface and a big play button. In "play these movie trailers for me" mode that's what it does.

      The hard stuff comes when you start to use it for recompressing codecs or cut & paste video editing, which are harder concepts in themselves, brushed metal or not, but QuickTime actually does them very well. Anyway, it won Apple an Emmy for contributions to film editing, so it can't be as bad as you say.

      You're probably just used to the design philosophy of WMP which does things differently.

    7. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I miss most about running Windows is SmartFTP and mIRC. While there are a plethora of graphical FTP and IRC clients for Mac OS X, they all lack something, and it has been my experience that the most usable Mac software is released as demoware, shareware, or strictly commercial software. That in and of itself isn't a bad thing (mIRC is ostensibly shareware), but the Mac stuff is usually crippled, or time-limited, or something to that effect (I don't have a problem paying for software--I'm probably one of the few that registered mIRC--but I don't have a lot of patience for nag screens, bugs, and lack of features. Also, no source or documentation).

      Then there are the games...but I don't really miss those. The ones I would be inclined to play (Doom III, Neverwinter Nights, Worms 3D) have Mac ports (although my lowly G3 won't run them).

      Lastly, my biggest pet peeve is that new versions of Java are almost always 6 months to a year behind the Solaris/Linux/Windows release from Sun. I would really like to start messing with 1.5/5.0, but it won't be out until Tiger is released.

      That's it, really; everything else is gravy. I have Firefox 1.0, Mail.app, iTunes, MPlayer OS X (which is fantastic, btw), Netbeans, Eclipse, Tomcat, Postgres, MySQL, Open Office, SNES 9X, Bittorrent (or Azureus), Gimp, and so on and so forth. I haven't regretted my decision at all since switching 3 years ago.

      (Incidentally, Quicktime will display full-screen if you pay for the pro version ($30). I use MPlayer OS X instead, because it's free, faster, and plays many more formats. There's also VideoLan Client, which is more robust but slower and more resource intensive. I have no idea what is meant by "extended desktop".)

      - Jesse

    8. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by Espectr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I switched to macosx from windows , and yes there is stuff i hate missing:

      -If you use MSN, say good bye to a decent client. No audio or video
      -Macs are generally more expensive, and only come with 256mb ram, unless you get a top of the line model. Macs love ram, so you need lots of it.
      -There is no driver for either my lexmark printer, or my new cannon printer through a windows network. This is the biggest problem i have. Check that your printer is supported in mac, not only through a native driver, but through gimp-print and smb as well (unless you only have one machine)
      -Most linux software will run, check fink.sf.net. But they will use apple's X11, which works, but eats extra ram additional of the apple native server.

    9. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Quicktime definitely does do fullscreen. What doesn't is the free version of Apple's Quicktime player - though for $25 US you get fullscreen and a lot more handy features.

      Actually, it does. The functionality to play movies fullscreen is there, only the menu is disabled for the free version. Use AppleScript to access it.

      on open FileName
      tell application "QuickTime Player"
      activate
      open FileName
      present movie 1
      end tell
      end open

      present movie 1 means fullscreen mode.

    10. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by jamesbrown1000 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, Quicktime definitely does do fullscreen. What doesn't is the free version of Apple's Quicktime player - though for $25 US you get fullscreen and a lot more handy features.


      Here's a handy AppleScript droplet that will give you full-screen QT movies ...

      on open fileName
      tell application "QuickTime Player"
      open fileName
      present movie 1
      end tell
      end open

      Save it as an Application to make it a droplet. Drop your movie on it and ... fullscreen pr0n!
      --
      Mindy: "Well...desserts aren't always right." Homer: "But they're so sweet!"
    11. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by superdifficult · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus, they love to call the command key by several different names

      Nope, you're confusing us with people that don't use Macs.

      Another one - OS X's in-built CD-writing just can't do multi-session properly. You write multi-session on it, and you can read only on other macs, so it screws up and only shows the most recent files on PCs. It is also goddawful slow compared to CD-burning with Nero on a Windows comp...

      How does it compare to Window's built in CD burning? I imagine that you all use Nero because the Windows CD burning software sucks. On the Mac we use Toast and it is excellent.

      OS X is not super-stable

      That's just crazy. It's rock solid.

      The OS is more expensive if you want to update...

      What does Windows cost again? $299.00 for Professional? what does the Mac OS cost again? $129.00? And the Mac OS plus the cost of a whole new version of iLife (I'm sure Apple NZ would have given you an upgrade price) $178.00? Yeah. That Mac OS is WAAAAY more expensive.

      But your sure nailed it with those keyboard shortcuts. They are really confusing. What? They are...

    12. Re:Max OS X is great, but... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2, Funny

      The wings that fold out of the iBook power supply so you can wrap the cable, the button and LEDs on that battery so you can check charge without using the computer, everywhere you look there a nice touches which added together make for a far nicer experience.

      I was really surprised to discover that my father's (awful) Dell laptop has that LEDs-on-battery thing - except its design is ever so slightly broken.

      The only way you can see the LEDs is to remove the battery... :-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  11. Re:Tiger by blixel · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's just a pity that this book is 1 year late.

    The book isn't a year late, the review is. I've had this book since February of this year. The date of the book is December 2003.

  12. Re:A Tiger by any other name by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Puddy-tat"

    </tweetie-bird>

  13. Re:A Tiger by any other name by bsartist · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are they going to call it after Tiger? My assumption is Lion

    And after that, Bear. Oh, my!

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  14. QuickTime /does/ play fullscreen, actually by Niko. · · Score: 2, Informative

    The free version of QT that comes with the box does not play fullscreen, but the full version ($35US, quicktime.apple.com) plays fullscreen very well, as well as allows you to edit QT content in many ways that the free version doesn't: add/remove tracks, adjust a plethora of attributes (size, aspect ratio, graphics mode, sound levels etc.) For example, I do a fair amount of basic video editing with iMovie, but iMovie won't let you swap the video track left to right, ie. car entering frame left now entering from the right. Full QuickTime does that in two or three clicks, without re-encoding.

  15. Re:A Tiger by any other name by ip_fired · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple registered the names of some other large cats including Lynx, Cougar, and Leopard.

    --
    Don't count your messages before they ACK.
  16. Answers by claudebbg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Concerning the extended desktop on iBooks:
    http://www.rutemoeller.com/mp/ibook/supportlist_e. html
    will do the trick (easy, safe -list of supported machines, clean). Concerning the Quicktime full-screen, previous answers are complete (buy it if you also need editing, trick it, or just use VLC as you perhaps already do on Linux).

    And yes, there are differences between Linux, Windows and MacOsX and that makes some of the possible annoyance.
    If you know Linux well, you'll discover some little changes, like when you switch to FreeBSD or AIX or Solaris. Basically you can (configure; make; make install;) run most of Linux tools. You'll certainly miss the multi-desktop feature (not included but some free/sharewares do the trick) and discover Expose (whaaaou).

    If you know Windows well, you'll find the Finder strange at the beginning, you'll perhaps regret the latest games (situation gets better but slowly), and some advanced P2P/Ripping tools (situation gets better really fast), you'll miss the global inconsistence you got accustomed to and perhaps some keyboard tricks (like calling menus with alt-E), you'll discover new Ms Prices (Office is really expensive on Mac and stealing it is easier but still forbidden), you'll miss the graphical admin (get server tools if you like admin with windows or get some of the freewares which do that well or remember it's Unix and you can do what you want with a terminal). And of course you'll discover "major updates" with "real features" (and "price";-( every 18 months.

    There are plenty of good sides of course but you seem to have heard enough of them for today...

    Just remember the first week is awkward and you have to realize you need to learn new moves. Don't try a small weekend switch and get ready to spend some time at the beginning to make your new /Users (oops, not /home nor /usr) feel good.

    And ask some Mac users about your precise needs and habits, they'll certainly tell you how to find a solution.

  17. Ported from Windows by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This has been addressed in several interviews with Win Game -> Mac porting houses. It seems that while raw OpenGL performance is about the same between a Mac and a similar PC, the differences come in the game design / optimization and other libraries used. Many coding decisions made in the original game were done with the Windows / x86 crowd in mind. Even many PC "OpenGL" games still use other DirectX libraries for sound, user I/O, and other tasks. Even some very basic considerations, such as data file read-in, is done in little endian. Differences like this are almost nill in a small academic test case, but are significant in a complex game. Virtual machines, such as those used for AI in games like Quake3 are also optimized for x86.

    For an example of a "pretty good" port, try the latest Mac build of UT2004. It has a few more tweaks and makes uses of a newer version of OpenAL. It's still slower than the native Windows version, but it's not too bad.

  18. Re:A Tiger by any other name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about the rumored windows version. I hear that, in deference to Windows, it is bloated and slow, and for that reason they are calling it Garfield.

  19. Right tool for the job... by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have personal biases, and I think we all do. But the fact remains, the best choice is to use the right tool for the job.

    Mac diehards will flame me, but a Mac is not always the best tool.

    If you live or work in a MS world, then no amount of utilities and features will ever make your Mac fit perfectly. However, if you only have to grab mail and swap calendar data from an exchange server and open/edit files from Office, then perhaps a Mac will be OK. If you need to access SMB shares and printers, Mac OS X should work fine out of the box. If your office has a screwy setup then you might need to use Dave. Then again, it might also be configured in such a way that your Mac may never be able to connect. A Mac isn't a Windows PC, so there's no guarantee.

    If you need to work on a "pure" Unix system, you should be OK. It's POSIX compliant and has pretty much every OS feature found on FreeBSD (with some bits from OpenBSD) though implementation may be different.

    If you need to use a Windows-only application, you could probably use Virtual PC, but performance will suck. Badly. Even on an overclocked 9 GHz G7.

    You need to figure out what exactly your needs are and pick the right hardware and software for the job. I have friends and coworkers that use 8-year-old Silicon Graphics (SGI) workstations for both work and home use with great success!! I have friends who are highly talented software engineers that use nothing but Wnidows. I've had a college professor who does GIS R&D on a second generation iMac. There are all types.

    As for me, these days I develop software for internal company use. My platform of choice is Linux, though I still run a few Solaris servers for various projects. I also have a company-issue ThinkPad running Win2K for the corp stuff, but it gets little use. At home I have a variety of machines... new, old, and ancient. Win, Mac, Linux, Unix, Prodos. :) The only Mac I use these days is my PowerBook G4 I use for most of my personal web surfing, personal email, digital photography, digital home videos, and other light duty experimenting. It works like a charm and I love it. But I also love my other toys, and it's a PC and a PS2 that I play my games on. I don't bother running anything other than Enigmo, SimCity 4, and UT2004 on the PowerBook.

  20. Re:A Tiger by any other name by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hobbes". Then "Krazy Kat".

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  21. Re:Tiger by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been meaning to ask...

    With the release of FreeBSD-5.3, are we going to see userland changes? I'm curious, a lot of the core utils have been significantly updated, and I think Panther is still running mostly on 4.x's userland.

  22. Sorry classic Mac users. Mac OS is ours now. by Sevn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And I truly mean it. There has been so much influence from the FOSS, OSS, OSC, CIAFBINAACPHPGPG13, etc and so many features have been added that cater to my kind of work that it's not surprise that the powerbook count has been steadily rising at meetings and conferences. We had one guy left in our department that stubbornly refused to stop developing perl on his winXP laptop. We let him borrow a 12" powerbook for the weekend and he still has it. His winXP laptop is a place to sit one of those obnoxiously large-bottomed coffee pot/cups. XCode is fun stuff to play with. It was so fun we've ended up using Mac OS X for some small kiosk based products. So far we've purchased 5 Xserve RAID's for storage when we need something cheap and autonomous. They've been cheap as sin and rock solid reliable. Ich bein Impressed! (lame sealab reference) We probably aren't going to be using it for servers anytime soon. We have a pretty entrenched RHES 3.0 install and have just started to see the light at the end of the tunnel with the package management hell that naturally arises when you have UTF8 compatibility issues with Perl, a need for a version of aspell that isn't 3 fucking years old, or the ability to make a ton of custom rpm's for various things (ldap integration, sendmail customizations, etc) and not cause dependancy breakage hell.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  23. Re:Take that Apple??? by Mikito · · Score: 2, Informative

    The srm command, without any flags, is supposed to overwrite a file 35 times.

    --
    Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
  24. 3 days ago by adaminnj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The day before Thanksgiving I bought my first Mac (a 12in Ibook 1.2 Gig, and I talked the salesperson out of a bag and an extra 256Megs of Ram)

    I for one will probably not be buying this book until I need it. Thus far I have been able to install everything I need to run my Linux Apps, and have loaded Gtk2 and Gkrellm and got them running without a hitch with Fink.

    It took me about 6 hours of messing around with this laptop and saying to myself "I Hate Mac OSX-nix why am I doing this to myself" untill I had some kind of breakthrough, and I'm feeling much more comfortable; don't get me wrong, I love Linux and KDE (just MHO) but if this is as stable as I'm told since all I do with a laptop is check Email, web, Light linux admin and development, this laptop is nice with great battery life and light.

    I am glad that this book is available, even if there is another pussycat in the wings. I don't think I will be upgrading right away, and good resources can be hard to come by.

    I wish Safari had a web spellcheck.

    freetradecampus.com

    --
    I'd Tell you all my secrets but I lie about my past
    1. Re:3 days ago by jdwest · · Score: 2, Informative

      All Cocoa apps (e.g. Safari) have a spell check option. Edit->Spelling->Spelling Or Edit->Spelling->Check Spelling Or Edit->Spelling->Check Spelling as You Type

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
  25. "Rock Solid" by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who buys into the OSX being "rock solid" obviously never ran an OSX server with over 100 clients. Take NetBoot for example - great system when it works, but has a tendency to simply stop working for seemingly no reason whatsoever.

    If you want examples visit the Apple support discussions and look under OSX Server.

    OSX Server is definitely a feminine OS. It does what it wants when it wants with no reason or accountability. You just have to accept whatever it decides to do and attempt to work around it.

  26. Usability issue by Thu25245 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is an HCI issue. "Cut" by itself is a destructive operation. Apple considers destructive operations on file system objects to be a Bad Thing, since it would be too easy for a novice user to remove a file this way. Remember, the Mac UI is supposed to be safe before powerful. You are, of course, free to disagree.

  27. Linux & OS X Differences by kurt555gs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have Linux servers, (SuSE RH, Debian) but I prefer Macs for workstations.

    I can use Apple X11 and do the ssh -X -l root user@domain.com to work on the Linux boxen while I am inside at lan speed, and I have found NX ( http://www.nomachine.com ) for everywhere else.

    I like the OS X user interface more than I do Linux though, and I love my PowerBook.

    OS X still is close enough that I can scp -r user@domain:/stuff/ /Users/home/me unlike using a windows lappy.

    When friends of mine as if OS X is similar to linux on the comand line I just tell them.

    "It's like going to a Korean massage parlor and getting a Chinese girl. Most woul'nt know the difference"

    In any case, OS X is where I choose to spend my time .... I cant wait for Tiger

    Cheers

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  28. Re:iBooks can span, with a wee OF hack... by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do however miss:...The ability to turn off the laptop screen and use merely the external monitor The only thing you need is an external keyboard for that. Put the laptop in "Sleep" mode ['blue' Apple menu], close the lid on the 'book, press any key on external keyboard... there's your external-monitor-only.

  29. Re:A Tiger by any other name by AusG4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do people keep forgetting "Cougar".

    I want to take my Cougar home, damnit.

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  30. Re:Tiger by RdsArts · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't remember where, but I believe during the main push for 10.3, they were touting that much of the userspace had already moved to the (then recent) 5.1 code, so I imagine this release will be no different.

  31. Apple's market share is declining by Branka96 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The claim that "Since the iMac, Apple's market share has been steadily increasing, ..." is simply false.
    In fiscal 1999, the first full year after the introduction of the iMac, Apple had sales of 3.5 millions computers. In fiscal 2004 they sold 3.3 millions computers. So, in terms of absolute numbers they are down. In terms of market share they are down a lot.

    1. Re:Apple's market share is declining by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In terms of market share they are down a lot.

      That is true, if you are counting market share by sales. If you are counting the number of machines owned and in use, well, that number is not so easy to calculate. Four years ago I bought two towers, a PC and a mac. The mac is currently my web server/PVR/MP3 server/DVD player/sometimes extra gaming box. The PC is, well it doesn't work anymore and even if it did, it would not be good for much aside from a dumb terminal. Your method of counting does not include either machine, even though I still buy new hardware and software for one of them. I don't see many estimates that account for the number of years a machines is usable, nor for may estimates that include the amount of use a machine gets. How many cheap PCs are purchased for someone, but are only powered on three times and then sit in a closet or under a desk while grandma uses her olde fashioned typewriter?

      If you define market share by number of sales, compared to total sales, then you are correct. If you want meaningful statistics on what percentage of machines being used are Macs, well, those numbers are not really available. I can tell you anecdotally, however, among computing professionals, they are way, way up.

  32. Re:The "lag" time by nuggetman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't alt-tab between windows in the same program

    switch programs: ALT+TAB
    switch windows w/in a program: ALT+~
    show all windows: F9
    show current app windows: F10

    I have no delete key.

    on a mac laptop, pressing Fn+DELETE (the key typically called backspace on a PC that is labeled delete on a mac) will delete the characters in front of the cursor, similar to pressing DEL on a pc

    It's the little things like having a scroll section on my trackpad that I miss.

    http://gnufoo.org/ucontrol/ucontrol.html
    http:/ /www.ragingmenace.com/software/sidetrack/

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.