Creative, Apple Battle for MP3 Player Market
kurtz_tan writes "Creative Technology is spending 100 million in a marketing blitz to 'regain its rightful place in the audio industry' by trying to dominate the MP3 market which is now led by the Apple iPod (54% of the market last year for MP3 players that use hard disks). Creative is second with 16.5%. Does Creative Zen sound as cool as Apple iPod ?" And reader TheMediaWrangler writes "The Register reports that Apple will build a stockpile of flash-based iPods to be shipped as early as January or February of 2005. AppleInsider had the original scoop."
as if Steve Jobs were paying off Slashdot (oh wait, maybe he is...)
The Zen Xtra has more features than the 3gen Ipod that came out around the same time. The Zen Touch has a longer battery life, is cheaper, and probably has some neat firmware features compared to the 4gen Ipod. "Prettier" does not mean "superior."
But is that completely true?
Personally, I want a player that doesn't require proprietary software to use. I don't want its main strength to be that it's tied to an overpriced music store that forces me to burn/crack/transcode to be used on half my audio hardware, or a inferior audio player (I'll stick to eMule, my own CD collection and Foobar, for the time being).
Apple's offering, despite the nice physical design and great navigation, is too much bloat for way too much money in my eyes.
Creative's aiming more for a consumer like me. The problem is, their flash-based players don't require proprietary hardawre. The Zen does. And the physical design and navigation are quite bluntly just flat-out inferior to Apple's. But the lack of ITMs? In my eyes, that's a good thing.
And how easy is it when you want to listen to it on the MP3 player in your car?
This whole ease of use thing is important, I agree entirely, but the integration with the Apple store doesn't make it easier for people who want to listen to music they already own on another format, or for people who want to listen to music that isn't carried on iTMS. Neither of those instances may be as large as the number of technophobic soccer moms that want to plug something in and get the Newest Britney Spears album, but to consider them a tiny demographic is delusional. To say that price doesn't matter is equally asinine.
I can't argue with you about mindshare, but here's a tip: "hipsters" aren't listening to U2.
Ah, defining the market to be What Your Product Does.
Apple has high-quality hardware? What planet are you living on?
Anyone who fixes computers can tell you that Macs have more hardware problems than any computer. By a HUGE margin. And I'm talking about post iMac stuff. Before the iMac, it was even worse.
I got iRiver H320 after a long wait and after thorough study.
+ design& hl=en&lr=&selm=brah09%2417vc8%241%40ID-177983.news .uni-berlin.de&rnum=2i gital/?sernum=771p hp?name=News&file=a rticle&sid=75_ comments.php?id =4177_0_7_0_C0 00134.html
Its faucking awesome,
the minute ipod talked about phote viewer in iPod, iriver made an firmware update and now i can watch video on my iriver H320. thats the power of developing an open system.
love for open systems and rebellian against tyranny semms to be innate in me.
Theres little learnning curve for navigation, but iriver can always make a firmware update to improve the navigation.
i think ipod back u2 theme is cool, not sure about ipod white and pink.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ipod+gay
http://www.gay.com/style/d
http://www.redban.com/modules.
http://www.ipodlounge.com/ipodnews
http://www.stereogum.com/archives/
(no offense pls, i just want to mention the direction the looks design is going these days - i guess every generation wants to look different from the older generation. I am sure, there will come time, when people will think Ipod and bright colored players suck)
-jen