Slashdot Mirror


Point and Click Linux

Robin "Roblimo" Miller is well-known in the open-source world for advocating cheap, user-friendly Linux computing and demonstrating that it's not only possible but available, right now. (He's also a writer and editor at NewsForge, and the editor in chief of OSTG, of which Slashdot is a part, and therefore one of my bosses; take that for what it's worth.) Roblimo's new book Point and Click Linux really consists of three things: the book itself, an included copy on CD of the Debian-based SimplyMepis Linux distribution, and a DVD featuring Roblimo's multi-part narrated video guide for getting started with Linux, Mepis and KDE. "Getting started" is key; this book is for the interested beginner, not the power user. Read on for the rest of my review. Point and Click Linux author Robin "Roblimo" Miller pages 270 publisher Prentice Hall rating 9 reviewer timothy ISBN 0131488724 summary Friendly, casual, hands-on approach to Linux; blasts users' fears that Linux is hard to use for everyday tasks. The Linux with which to point and click

SimplyMepis is a KDE-centric Live CD Linux which is also well suited for hard-drive installation. Before talking about Point and Click's text, Mepis itself deserves some description, because it's the basis for the examples in this example-laden book.

Not many years ago, books that came with a Linux distribution usually had the user prepare an initial pair of floppies, cross his fingers, and sacrifice at least a hard drive partition just to try it out by installing either from a CD or over the network. If the user wanted to keep an existing Windows partition, things were even more complicated, because there were no newbie-friendly non-destructive partition editors. Having bored (suffered) through that process, and seemingly tried every possible combination of boot+root floppy images before hitting the one that actually worked all my hardware enough to let the installation begin, I'm a big fan of Live CD Linux distros: this is progress.

Until sometime last winter, I would have suggested that any Linux book come with a copy of Knoppix, which is so astoundingly useful it's nearly impossible to overpraise. (I'm glad to see that several books are now coming bundled with it. Marcel Gagne's Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye and Knoppix Hacks both come with pressed versions of Knoppix.) Mepis, though, deserves the acclaim that's been heaped on it in the last several months, and makes a perfect choice to include with a book for Linux newcomers. And while a Live CD has obvious advantages, a user can follow the bulk of this book with any computer running KDE under Linux (or one of the BSDs, for that matter).

Mepis is at present my most-used distribution; I've used it recently to:

  • Rescue data from a friends' grandmother's malware-hobbled Windows PC, on which the Windows goo was so thick that even booting up was at best a sometimes thing. (Switching her to Linux entirely is the next project.)
  • Install Mepis's version of Debian on several of my computers; in fact, Live CDs like Mepis and Knoppix are the only way I've installed Linux for the past year.
  • Show some kids TuxKart. (One of them beat my all-time high on his first attempt. Beginner's luck.)

Compared to Knoppix and most other live CDs, Mepis has what I consider a slightly friendlier feel; in particular, it gathers several of the more annoying and potentially intimidating sysadmin tasks into two groups, each with an icon on the desktop: the "System Center," for tweaking display, network and mouse parameters; and "User utilities," which for now contains only a "Clean User Space" program to clear one's browser history and cache, as well as purge the current bash history and recent documents. (Most people, at birth, don't even know what "sysadmin" means; having desktop icons to common admin tasks is considerate of new users.)

Though it will work on a wide range of x86 machines, like any Live CD (and any OS, really) Mepis benefits from running on a fast system with lots of RAM. 128MB of free RAM is what I'd call a realistic minimum; my system is perfectly run-of-the-mill by current new-PC standards (Sempron 2800+ processor, 512MB of RAM), and far more than necessary.

Get clicking

Point and Click Linux is aimed squarely at those new -- including perfectly new -- to using Linux at all, and it would make a fine non-intimidating manual for someone sitting down at his first computer.

To that end, Roblimo does not assume that the reader will be installing Mepis onto his hard drive; the whole point of the book is that all the point-and-click magic can be tried on a typical Windows PC with nothing more than a reboot. That said, current hard drives are much faster than current optical drives, and a system installed to a hard disk makes saving files a simpler process. I had brand-new system bought from a local megastore which was all set for a Free operating system, and decided to put this version of Mepis onto it. I used this book as my guide to the system, as I suspect a new user would -- as an actual step-by-step guide, not a random-access source of knowledge. So I installed the system and then tried the examples throughout.

The first four chapters make up a section called "Getting Started." Chapters here stray toward the short and snappy rather than comprehensive; all four of these might be condensed into a single chapter in a book meant for technophiles. Getting Started details some of Linux's advantages (lack of spyware, quick bug fixes, low price), booting Mepis from the CD-ROM drive (or installing it to hard disk) and working with KDE. The level is perfect for a literate but ignorant user: Roblimo explains in simple terms how to log in to the system (user "demo," password "demo" for the live CD), moving about on the KDE desktop, and using the KDE panel and K menu. He sneaks in one application in this section, too (KWrite), not so much as an application in itself, but because it demonstrates how other well-behaved KDE programs should act when it comes to opening and saving files, navigating the directory structure, etc.

An early snag: Chapter 4's instructions on reformatting a hard drive to let Windows and Linux both exist happily on the same PC didn't work for me. I was installing onto a brand new hard drive, and I thought I'd give dual-booting a shot to see what Windows was like nowadays, and so followed the instructions on setting up a machine to dual-boot. The disk-partitioning and formatting program QTParted (as user friendly as anything I've seen in that category on any platform) recognized the Windows partition that came with the machine, and let me shrink it to make room for installing Linux. But after divvying up the hard drive space and actually copying Mepis onto the drive, the machine would happily start Linux, but never actually booted Windows -- only generated an error message that it couldn't. I repeated the whole process, with the same result. It could be a quirk of my hardware (or more likely, pilot error, since I don't see similar complaints in the Mepis forums), but I never did get it to boot into Windows.

For many users, though, a functioning Windows install is probably a non-negotiable requirement. If any readers run into the same problem I did, and can't just shrug and toss Windows completely, my happy-overkill advice would be to invest in a second hard drive and skip all the hassles of dual- or multi-booting. (Storage is cheap, and it's hard to have too much of it.) If your drives are big enough, it also means you can back up the important data from each one onto the other, which is a nice bonus. Since Windows is to me only a curiosity, I decided not to pursue the partitioning problem -- I did the install one more time, this time choosing to use the entire hard disk.

That hitch aside, the book is straightforward, practical and accurate. It's also limited to a small subset of tasks and activities, which is perfectly reasonable given the intended audience.

Section II, "Linux Applications" is the book's largest, mostly because here too chapters are divided by application, rather than throwing several apps into a small number of longer chapters. It's also the most important, in my view, because the point of using Linux -- for most people, at least -- is not to simply appreciate its aesthetics, but to get things done. ("Getting things done" includes playing games!)

The applications covered start with Kppp (also given its own video segment on the DVD) -- a handy choice, because while Mepis will automatically detect and set up a DHCP broadband connection, readers who don't have broadband set up will benefit from many of the other apps (email, web-browsing, IM) only if they have a working Internet connection. Since I'm using a DSL connection, I didn't need to follow the advice here, but as a long-time Kppp user, I can vouch for the accuracy of its instructions. Yes, readers will need a Linux-friendly ISP and a phone line; the book as well as the video address this reality.

With Internet connection in place, the section proceeds apace, introducing Mozilla across not one but four separate chapters. (An introductory chapter to the Mozilla suite, followed by one apiece on Mozilla as a browser, email client, and web-page editor.) Firefox and Thunderbird are given a quick mention, but for the purposes of this book, Mozilla it is. I've recently moved almost completely to Firefox as a web browser, and I wish that Firefox had been emphasized instead, but the same principles apply at any rate. Windows users unused to browsers besides IE are likely to be pleased with the lucid instructions on blocking pop-up ads.

Chapters 10 through 15 also introduce a software suite in several easy chunks, this time the OpenOffice.org applications. While 5 chapters in 30-some pages is clearly not enough to make anyone an expert, it is plenty to establish the basic operations it takes to create and manipulate documents containing text, numbers and graphics in OO.o. The short (one-page!) Chapter 15 succinctly addresses working with Microsoft Word: "But don't expect 100% compatibility with MS Office. You won't get it. Instead, expect to get enough compatibility for everyday work, with some of the 'frills' left out."

The other chapters introduce some of the other Linux standbys included with Mepis: the multi-IM wonder Kopete (my current favorite AIM client), The GIMP, Frozen Bubble (fair warning is given about its addictive nature) and more. Especially worthy of note is the finance application called CheckBook Tracker, which is simpler than GNUcash but allows for low-key tracking and balancing of passbook accounts, and is a good start for putting money management on a computer. I'd never heard of it before reading this book, and I'm impressed.

A third section, "Beyond the Basics," is still pretty basic by Linux-world standards, but provides some appetite-whetting for new users, with instructions on the rudiments of installing new software using Kpackage, changing the look of one's desktop, cooperating with Windows (using Samba, Win4Lin and CrossOver Office), and customizing the included firewall application. Worms and the viruses aren't the problem under Linux that they are for Windows users, but they certainly could become more of a problem, and it's good to have some information on limiting outside access to one's PC.

While Kpackage is a perfectly competent package, I hope that the next version of Mepis will include by default the even-friendlier Synaptic as well as Kpackage. This section is one where I wish the short chapters had been at least a bit longer, because much of the coolest software for Linux is out there waiting to be grabbed. Maybe that's for the next set of readers up the totem pole, though.

However, a nice chapter (written by Joe Barr) at least gives some of the command-line rudiments that readers will need to get beyond pointing and clicking, which even in a book about getting along with the GUI is useful information.

A few appendices round out the book; one gives additional information on Mepis, and the other two list currently popular distributions and books, for readers who want to take the next steps toward Linux proficiency.

The small screen

The included video -- 13 short videos, actually -- are fun, and a nice touch. They illustrate in what will for experienced users be excruciating detail the same things the book talks about. When Roblimo says "put it in your computer's CD drive," you see his hand putting the disc into his computer's CD drive. When he says to move the mouse to a certain point, you see his pointer (helpfully highlighted with a translucent yellow circle) move to the appropriate spot.

For new users especially, I think it's much easier to follow something being done on screen than it is to interpret written instructions. The production on the DVD is what you might expect from the guy who for years ran a site called cheapcomputing.com; strictly functional and a bit rough around the edges, with adequate but lo-fi sound and picture, including Roblimo's web-cam captured face as he talks the user through each step. Having a human face on screen blunts the strangeness of watching someone else's disembodied pointer move around the screen pointing and clicking away, which is the case with some video-training material.

(One wrinkle: unless you have both a CD ROM drive and a DVD drive in your PC, you won't be watching the videos and running Mepis as a live CD at the same time. Mepis will be occupying at least one optical drive until you decide to exit it completely.)

You can probably tell already whether Point and Click Linux is suited for you, and the answer is likely No. Just the same, I discovered a few things about Linux and KDE that I'd never tried before reading the book, and know at least a dozen people I think would benefit from a copy.

You can purchase Point and Click Linux from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews. To see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

192 comments

  1. Isn't this by Harrakis · · Score: 0, Troll

    the idea behind a Mac with OSX?

    1. Re:Isn't this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Creating powerfull yet easy to use software has been the idea behind every operating system ever created.

    2. Re:Isn't this by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how OS X is not linux and many major components aren't free in any sense of the word, I see a difference.

    3. Re:Isn't this by adamh526 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yup. Minus the $2,000 that is. Here's a pretty good article (linked to from MEPIS.org) that basically says if you have the cash, go get a G5. If not, use linux - specifically MPEIS. I don't know how many people I could also speak for, but I definitely fall into the G5-dreaming but linux-using group. Maybe once I'm out of college...

    4. Re:Isn't this by adamh526 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, but there's something about buying dying technology that doesn't sit right with me. Ok, the G4 may not be "dying," yet... But consider this - OS X is being continually optimized for the G5, as are the majority of Apple's (and everyone else's for that matter) software titles. Sooner, rather than later, Apple is going to be a company basing itself completely around the 64-bit computing possibilities that the G5 has to offer. Not only would I like to be able to run OS X now, but I'd like to be able to continue running it as it is updated and improved. Therefore - no, I won't even consider buying a G4. Sorry Apple.

    5. Re:Isn't this by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Ok, the G4 may not be "dying," yet.

      Nah.... it's just beleagured.

      ;^P

    6. Re:Isn't this by jeif1k · · Score: 1

      Let's look at your choices:

      (1) You can get a sluggish end-of-life under-$1000 Macintosh with almost no software on it, shell out about $100/year to keep it up to date (not to mention the cost of all the other software upgrades), and then fiddle with CDs and downloads to install the latest versions of everything, or

      (2) You can get a blazing under-$1000 Linux system that leaves the Macintosh in the dust, lets you pick the user interface and theme you like, comes with thousands of applications preinstalled, and comes with lifetime, automatic free upgrades.

    7. Re:Isn't this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the idea behind a Mac with OSX?

      No.

    8. Re:Isn't this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, the G4 may not be "dying," yet...

      Are you waiting for Netcraft to confirm it?

    9. Re:Isn't this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Creating powerfull yet easy to use software has been the idea behind every operating system ever created.
      You've never used MVS, have you?
  2. Cool kernel version by General_Corto · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't wait to get my hands on kernel 'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX'.

    1. Re:Cool kernel version by Scoria · · Score: 1

      That's better than kernel XXX, "Linus does CLI," I suppose.

      --
      Do you like German cars?
  3. It is a good book by KingOfTheNerds · · Score: 3, Informative

    Being a linux newbie myself, I purchased this book and it was a great read. Much easier to read than some other tech books. I'd recommned it anyone, cept the hardcore power users.

    --
    Want to learn about anything sexual? Check out the sex wiki:
    1. Re:It is a good book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      KingOfTheNerds is a linux newbie?

      Do you bunk with SirHaxalot, or what?

    2. Re:It is a good book by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      And roblimo is not my boss.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    3. Re:It is a good book by KingOfTheNerds · · Score: 1

      SirHaxalot is a good friend of mine, along with SirTooLazyToGetAHandleButNotTooLazyToBashOtherPeop les. Your post did give me a good laugh though.

      --
      Want to learn about anything sexual? Check out the sex wiki:
    4. Re:It is a good book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive been looking for a book like this. As someone who has thouroughly searched for books at his local bookstores on linux, this should hopefully finally help me make the move from Windows XP.

      I even checked my local library, no linux books. Sad, ain't it folks?

    5. Re:It is a good book by GAlain · · Score: 1

      So you're new to slashdot too?
      RUN AWAY from /. NOW! Do it NOW before it's too late!
      Just telling you that for your own good ;-)

    6. Re:It is a good book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      along with Sir NotAppearingInThisPost

    7. Re:It is a good book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he has a good point. "King of the Nerds" is quite an arrogant handle. If you choose to yourself that you should have some reason to, or you're just making a fool out of yourself.

      I note from the UID that you're new to Slashdot as well. Funny, this.

  4. Version? by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Point and Click Linuxcomes with version XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    Gee, Linux is way ahead of Apple these days. They're only up to OS X.

    1. Re:Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Looks like the editors caught that slip-up, and removed that little bit.

    2. Re:Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > Point and Click Linuxcomes with version XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
      > Gee, Linux is way ahead of Apple these days.
      > They're only up to OS X.

      It's even ahead of that redirected porn site a few stories down. It's only triple X.

    3. Re:Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, Linux is way ahead of Apple these days. They're only up to OS X.

      And that's just the version number. You should see how far ahead Linux is of Apple in terms of technology.

  5. That's some up-to-date software! by koreth · · Score: 3, Funny
    Point and Click Linuxcomes with version XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
    Is that in Roman numerals, or has the version number been censored for our protection?
    1. Re:That's some up-to-date software! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's censored.
      Prior to the censorship, the version was intended to honor the death of Our (and by Our, I mean the lunix community) 2nd-most favorite picture: http://www.goatse.cx/giver.jpg

      -rylin

  6. Interesting by cuteseal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thanks for the informative review. Sounds like an interesting book/package. One of the reasons why I hardly use linux (although I've got it set up on a dual partition) is that basic tasks seem to have such a steep learning curve. Perhaps this book might help me overcome those.

    1. Re:Interesting by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's always a community waiting to help you. If it's an everyday task then more than likely someone has figured out how to do it quickly and easily. I would be more than happy to personally help you out as much as I can with any questions you may have.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    2. Re:Interesting by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      I have tried Mepis before and it really is a very easy to use distro. I am not sure what you have on your other partition right now but if you are not satisfied you might give it a whirl. Like any distro it has its pros and cons, ease of installation and a working setup is definitely its pro. Then you can get used to Linux, you'll be doing Linux From Scratch before you know it :)

  7. Was he looking over your shoulder? by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny
    pooint and clickRobin "Roblimo" Miller is well-known in the open-source world for advocating cheap, user-friendly Linux computing and demonstrating that it's not only possible but available, right now. (He's also a writer and editor at NewsForge, and the editor in chief of OSTG, of which Slashdot is a part, and therefore one of my bosses; take that for what it's worth.) Roblimo's new book Point and Click Linuxreally consists of three things: the book itself, an included copy on CD of the Debian-based SimplyMepis Linux distribution, and a DVD featuring Roblimo's 6-part narrated video guide for getting started with Linux, Mepis and KDE. "Getting started" is key; this book is for the interested beginner, not the power user. Read on for the rest of my review.

    Was he looking over your shoulder and threatening you with unemployment when you typed that? Holy typos Batman!

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Was he looking over your shoulder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the links to knoppix etc. are just links back to this story...

    2. Re:Was he looking over your shoulder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      pooint and clickRobin "Roblimo" Miller

      I've been waiting for a point-and-click Roblimo. It's sure to be easier to use than the CLI CowboyNeal I've been using for the pasty few years now.

    3. Re:Was he looking over your shoulder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      pasty few years now

      Your lack of sunlight qualifies you for the elite "UberGeek" status. I bow before you.

  8. Commendable, but... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

    The reason I should say this is because my mom is extremely typical. Things "power users" take for granted (or, rather, don't even think about for one second) are very puzzling to many average computer users. Not to mention the scare factor of going away from something well known (Windows + Office).

    This said however, I commend this new effort to promote Linux, but sadly I doubt it'll change much from all the previous such attempts.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Commendable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.xpde.com/

    2. Re:Commendable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot...

      She always prefers me to call her cumbunny.

    3. Re:Commendable, but... by saintp · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actually, my girlfriend, who uses her computer to check email, write papers, and read Harry Potter fanfic, thinks its kinda neat that she clicks on a chameleon instead of a boring "Start" for her menu, and a cute little fox instead of a big ugly "e" for the Internet. Not to the point of bragging to her friends, of course, but she adapted quite well to it. Also, SuSE puts OpenOffice under the "Office" menu with the simple name "Office Suite, and it's called just "Office" on the desktop, so the learning curve for that is pretty darn shallow. (Not trying to start SuSE vs. Ubuntu vs. Debian vs. your-fav-distro holy wars here, just mentioning what I'm familiar with.)

      Other than learning a few new icons, the Linux learning curve for basic tasks is very shallow. As a previous poster pointed out, not so much for more advanced tasks, but we aren't talking about power users here.

    4. Re:Commendable, but... by edraven · · Score: 1

      I highly commend this effort as well. But the fact that a 6-part video presentation exists to explain to the average user how Linux can be a point-and-click solution proves, more than anything, that it is not. No 6-part video presentations exist on the ease-of-use of the refrigerator.

    5. Re:Commendable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's unavoidable - there are idiosyncrasies that must be (un)learned. Having a "start" menu is a really dumb idea - it's not there to start things, it's to DO things. This is how I learned that, many many years ago in middle school:

      User: "How do I turn off the computer? I read that I can't just hit the power button."

      Me (irritated): "Yeah, well, first you open the Start menu and..."

      User: "What?! To stop the computer, I click on the start button?"

      Me: "Well, yes, of course that's how... Wait, yeah, that's a good point. It doesn't make any sense at all to put the shutdown command there. Anyway, that's how it works."

      User shrugs and shuts down the computer.

    6. Re:Commendable, but... by CumInHerTaco · · Score: 1

      a DVD featuring Roblimo's 6-part narrated video guide for getting started with Linux, Mepis and KDE.

      A 6-part narrative is hardly Point-n-Click...

      I can usually make it through the first 2 minutes of an instructional video, before I want to kill whoever is boring the shit out of me.

      /*sound of DVD getting snapped in half

      --
      The only way to end war is for everyone to get a piece!
    7. Re:Commendable, but... by wfberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      While it IS extremely typical, it's not an issue that should be addressed by linux distributions changing. Even moms should learn to cope with stuff like that. It's not like fridges all have identical handles, people don't even complain as much about cars being different models (or even stick shift in stead of automatic gear), they cope and adapt, even though operating a car in the wrong way is a million times more likely to kill them. Guess what, the differenlty shaped and colored steering wheel does the same thing!

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    8. Re:Commendable, but... by yamla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In that case, don't ever consider installing Longhorn for your mother when it is finally released. If the K icon confuses her, she'll be completely lost with all the user interfaces in Microsoft's next operating system.

      For that matter, better keep her with her current version of office. Microsoft often adds new features and rearranges existing layouts when they release a new version of Office.

      Also, for the love of god, don't ever get her a new car. New cars often look and feel quite different from older models. I have to adjust my sideview mirrors manually, for example, but my girlfriend has power mirrors. I doubt your mother could handle a much more significant difference like that.

      Personally, I consider it rather sad that your mother cannot handle a change like that.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    9. Re:Commendable, but... by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      . . .what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      Conversely, when I first started up Windows 95 as a "power user" with decades of computer experience on big iron, minis and micros and perfectly at home with Windows 3.11 I couldn't figure out how to do anything.

      There was not only no command line, but no menus and no icons of any interest to me (No, I didn't want to hook up to AOL), no nothin' that would even let me type a memo. Yeah, there was this really stupid button labeled "start," but I was already started. I didn't want to "start," I wanted to open the preinstalled copy of Office and type something.

      I basically stared at it for about five minutes and then said aloud, "Where the hell are my programs?"

      At that point my wife came over and showed me. She'd been using 95 at work for a few months already.

      At which point I said aloud, "Well, that's really stupid, and who the hell would look for their menus at the bottom of the screen anyway?"

      So . . .I guess Windows isn't "point and click" either, since, even as an experienced Windows user, I had to be shown what to point at and click on.

      At least the big "K" is a button right where a current Windows user would expect the menu button to be.

      Look, It's "Point-and-click" Linux, exactly as advertised, not "Exactly like your current version of Windows" Linux. Just like every version of MacOS is point and click, and just as Windows 3.11 was point and click.

      Even though they all differ markedly.

      And for what it's worth, my 70 year old mom, who has only been using micros for about a year, both Windows and Mac (Mac OS8 at home, Windows (in languages she doesn't read) in internet cafes when she's traveling), was able to get down and dirty with KDE set up for a "power user" in about 2 minutes flat.

      How do you know your mom is "extremely typical." You have a mom data point of one.

      KFG

    10. Re:Commendable, but... by jedaustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If your mother had never seen m$ windows then what would she expect?

      Just because your mom has used windows doesn't mean linux should look exactly like windows to be easy to use. If the computer came pre-installed with linux, they would learn it just like they did with windows.
      My wife who had no experience with either had no trouble figuring out where the games were or how to send email.

      My mother is completely baffled by windows.
      She calls me with the MOST retarded questions on earth, and it takes me a few minutes to figure out just what she is talking about. She has the complete set of 'video professor' cd's and still doesn't get it.

      Windows is not the end all of 'easy' you make it sound. It's easy to me, because I've been using it since v3.0. It's only easier if you already have experience with it.

      A live CD, a book, and a DVD is more than most windows users get.

    11. Re:Commendable, but... by ajs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be"

      Welcome to "culture shock" associated with leaving a software monoculture. Someday, I hope to see someone stare in incredulity when told that all desktops used to have the same icon for the desktop main menu.

      This has nothing to do with ease of use, and if such first impressions were a guideline, the PARC/Apple/Windows/CDE desktop UI gestalt would have died in its infancy. Typewriter users were railing against it for ages because it emphasized removing your hands from the keyboard (a major taboo), using backspace (just plain anti-social), and many other modes of interaction that were foreign to the typewriter age.

      Your mother will eventually either have to learn to get along without the word "start" or be phased out, just as typewriter users were, sorry.

      The same goes for the "my document is in Office 97 format, can you re-save, export, decrypt and send yours again?" office of the past. People are learning to use new tools and adapting to the future. Some won't... oh well.

      What truly limits Linux desktop acceptance in a wider context is the lack of some key legacy application interoperability like Peachtree, but that's a much higher bar than Linux was attempting to measure up to 3 years ago, and the bar isn't moving down!

      "I doubt it'll change much from all the previous such attempts."

      You misunderstand. There are no previous attempts. This is it. What I'm running on my desktop at work and at home is what I've been running for years. Nothing new here, just incremental improvements that will go on for centuries to come, I'm sure (though at some point so many components may have been re-built or replaced that we would not recognize it).

      What do you say to the folks who grow up with Linux today and encounter Windows for the first time... what happens when they say, "what's that start thing where the Fedora should be?"

    12. Re:Commendable, but... by jeif1k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      You mean the "Start" button that is, among other things, used for shutting down Windows? Yes, that's one of the features that usability alone dictates Linux shouldn't emulate.

      The reason I should say this is because my mom is extremely typical. Things "power users" take for granted (or, rather, don't even think about for one second) are very puzzling to many average computer users.

      Yes, which is why Linux should copy Windows's usability problems. Linux has to do better, and that breaks compatibility. Linux has to appeal to the next generation of users, both here and abroad, not to the old Windows and Macintosh fogeys, who keep complaining and will never be really satisfied with anything other than the platform they grew up on anyway.

      If your mother refuses to use Linux because she can't deal that the "Start" menu has a "K" on it, that's her problem. Most people are smart enough to figure it out that a menu that looks the same and is in the same place roughly does the same thing even if it has a K on it (the menu down there is already a concession; I think the Gnome default is preferable and clearer anyway). And most people also find savings of thousands of dollars in software enough of a motivation to get off their lazy butts and bother engaging their brain for a few minutes. But, ultimately, what your mother considers a "good UI" after years of having her mind warped by Microsoft software simply doesn't matter because the choices she makes don't matter to the long term future of the Linux desktop.

    13. Re:Commendable, but... by asliarun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, mother IS the necessity of invention.

    14. Re:Commendable, but... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      Jesus crhist. if your mom isn't clever enough to guess that if the K and the Start are in similar places, they might do similar things, or at the very least click on it and see what happens, then I don't think the problem is with Linux. That's not computer idiocy, that's just plain idiocy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Commendable, but... by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      The problem is similarity. That's one of the reasons why the Gnome-based desktops tend to be different;

      SuSE 9

      Fedora Core 3

      Ubuntu

      If it doesn't match what is expected, people will not click on the wrong thing or get confused when everything isn't exactly the same. By being different, people will tend to look first; they aren't worried that the icon isn't the same they already realize that it's not going to be the same.

      Both KDE and Gnome have the same basic menu options, so this is by no means a slam at KDE (I'm using it right now). The only menu difference is the default configuration.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    16. Re:Commendable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a Dilbert Strip (paraphrase):

      Mr. Annoying Guy: This software needs to be so simple my mom could use it.

      Alice: This software is so simple, a hamster could use it. Just how stupid is your mom?

      Mr. Annoying Guy: Let's leave my mom out of this.

      Alice: MY mom is a physicist.

    17. Re:Commendable, but... by briber · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Interesting that you should say that you stared at the screen for 5 minutes the first time you used Win95. That behavior was exhibited by testers and is EXACTLY why Microsoft added the start menu late in Win95's development.

      You see, Microsoft had bought into the fad of "document centric" computing. Applications were out. File types were in.

      What you were supposed when you encountered your brand spankin' new Win95 desktop (a COMPLETELY BLANK desktop) was create a new document or create a shortcut to an application that did not produce documents.

      Here is a typical scenario:

      Right click on the desktop, select new->folder

      Name the folder Anderson Account info (or what ever you want).

      Now open the folder you just created.

      Right click and select new->Excel spreadsheet.

      Name the new spreadsheet Anderson_Q1.

      Double click on your new spreadsheet shortcut and voila... here comes MS Excel.

      Folders first->then shortcuts->then finally your application.

      The tester just stared at the screens too. Document centric computing was not to be and so MS cobbled together the start menu we have today.

      Best Regards -Briber

    18. Re:Commendable, but... by trewornan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When was the last time you had to deal somebody who's never used a computer and has no "aptitude" whatsoever?

      I've been in that situation relatively recently and can assure you that if you can't count linux as "point and click" then neither is Windows.

      It's a complete myth that Linux is harder than Windows for a "muppet" user (especially if they only use basic functions). It's just that most muppet users have learned Windows first and hate the idea of having to relearn anything.

      Linux doesn't need to be easy to learn for a complete newbie - it needs to be easy to transfer skills learnt using Windows, and I think linux is already there.

    19. Re:Commendable, but... by Xerp · · Score: 1

      as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      I have experienced the very same sort of problems. But then this is simply what happens when one reaches a certain age. Guess that means you can "call bullcrap" on point-and-click Windows too.

      The problem that is described here is nothing to do with Linux, but is instead to do with the lack of ability in an older human. How many times do you tell her that you don't like peas, and yet there they are on your plate? Are technical sounding words spoken very slowly? Even the word technical comes out tech-ni-cal.
      Things "power users" take for granted

      Such as being able to remember what the day is, where they put their keys, that sort of thing.

      Oooh. Its ever so cold out, isn't it Ethel? Don't you think its cold? Better put a coat on to keep out the chill. I do hope they haven't moved the bananas again, don't you? Oooh, its ever so hard when they move the bananas. etc, etc, etc

      This said however Rosco, I commend your effort to promote FUD about Linux, but sadly I doubt it'll be believed any more than any previous such attempts.

    20. Re:Commendable, but... by Unnngh! · · Score: 1
      Are you afraid of your refrigerator? My mom's afraid of her computer...I'm sure she couldn't care less whether it runs Windows or Linux or OSX or Plan9 (well, maybe not Plan9). It's something that's hard enough to confront as-is and, if by rote memorization she can get to Word and an email program, she's doing fine in my book.

      Really, why bother for her to change? The videos do look interesting though and really, the car analogy probably works for anyone born much after 1950;)

    21. Re:Commendable, but... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      No 6-part video presentations exist on the ease-of-use of the refrigerator.

      There's plenty though about using Windows, or OS X. And after spending 10 minutes working out how to extract the shelves and drawers from my fridge to clean them, a video for that isn't really such a dumb idea. Doing anything for the first time is much harder than you remember it.

    22. Re:Commendable, but... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      as long as my mom, who can be called a computer idiot but still manages to do her work with MS Office, tells me "what's that K icon where START should be", I call bullcrap on any point-and-click Linux.

      I doubt your mother is really such an idiot. She coped with going from a typewriter to a PC, rotary to push button phones, she can cope with clicking on a K to pull up a menu.

    23. Re:Commendable, but... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      How do you know your mom is "extremely typical."

      Not to mention, wouldn't "extremely typical" be an oxymoron?

      Seriously though, after reading your post, I remember having the EXACT SAME thoughts about 95. A decade has dulled my memory though. I even remember clicking the Start button, only to see stuff I didn't want to use.. Documents, Settings, Shut Down, and, of course, Programs, with a bunch of sub-menus after it. I remember thinking what a ridiculous way that was to organize my programs. Although, aside from dabbling with 3.1, I'd mainly used AmigaOS before that, so I was used to having my cake and eating it too.

    24. Re:Commendable, but... by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      I must agree whole-heartedly. I mean, for the purposes of e-mail, paper-writing, and reading stories where random groupings of Hogwarts characters have sexual relations in 1337, any GNU/Linux distro is better than Windows, especially SuSE/FC/Mandrake/Ubuntu/distro de jure.

      It's more natural to click on a "programs" menu or some KDE-theme-related icon to get to a program than it is to click "Start". Yes, Microsoft got some good names, but that's all they have. That, and no Unix desktop uses a "start" menu to shut down the machine. That is just plain stupid.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    25. Re:Commendable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make fun of her for reading Harry Potter fanfic, right? ;)

    26. Re:Commendable, but... by LuSiDe · · Score: 1
      That, and no Unix desktop uses a "start" menu to shut down the machine. That is just plain stupid.

      It makes sense to me: an application is started to shut down the system (e.g. halt, reboot). I must admit, i find GNOME's solution much more cleaner and obvious though. GNOME calls that an 'action'.
      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    27. Re:Commendable, but... by echo · · Score: 1

      This is one thing that really bugs me about Distros and Gnome. AFAIK, Debian is the only one that ships Gnome as it comes from the Gnome developers. Ubuntu is next closest.

      Gnome did a lot of User testing, and has a HIG (Human Interface Guideline) and yet distributions want to throw that all away to "make it look like Windows".

      Kinda sad if you ask me.

      (interesting, those screenshots show Suse 9 to be very much like standard Gnome.... and Fedora to have the standard gnome layout, but when I installed Fedora last time, it had the old "RedHat" look...)

    28. Re:Commendable, but... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "You mean the "Start" button that is, among other things, used for shutting down Windows?"

      Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the start of the shutdown.

    29. Re:Commendable, but... by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. (interesting, those screenshots show Suse 9 to be very much like standard Gnome.... and Fedora to have the standard gnome layout, but when I installed Fedora last time, it had the old "RedHat" look...)

      Yep. I think Fedora Core 1 defaulted to the 'Gnome and KDE look alike' design. That's no longer the case. The tweaking of the Gnome default layout isn't happening as much as before for most distros that have both KDE and Gnome.

      So far, I've not deployed Gnome to a customer site though with all the work they have done on it, and the upcomming work on Beagle/Dashboard, I'm probably going to start using it myself again. (Right now, I use quite a few Gnome apps on KDE.)

      Very impressed with the direction of Gnome.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    30. Re:Commendable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlucky you are...

      My mom doesn't want to have menus at all. She wants to have five icons on her desktop (Mail, Web Browser, Home directory, Photo albums, Trash) and nothing else on the screen is ever used. She doesn't try using the applications menus either, so if it's not on the toolbar, she can't do it. Well after a few minutes, and if I'm not around, she may try to pull some menus down.

      There are people who didn't use WinXX much. For those people, GNU/Linux is a boon. My mom is completely lost when she has to use Windows.

  9. Okay... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm generally not a nut about formatting, grammar, or spelling but my god. That review was like an unholy trifecta of the English language gone terribly wrong.

    I really wanted to read the review and get something out of it, I just kept fumbling over the writing.

    Dear Slashdot "Editors"... Please for christmas, can Santa bring you all an unabridged grammar book and a spell checker.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Okay... by bkocik · · Score: 3, Funny
      That review was like an unholy trifecta of the English language gone terribly wrong.

      Really? It was like an unholy "bet in which you pick the first three winners of a horse race" of the English language?

    2. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 entry found for trifecta.
      trifecta n.

      A system of betting in which the bettor must pick the first three winners in the correct sequence. Also called triple.

      [tri- + (per)fecta.]

      ie. you need three things going together, often used these days to be three bad things. So I dunno how the hell you're using the word, grammar dude.

    3. Re:Okay... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Slashdot "Editors"... Please for christmas, can Santa bring you all an unabridged grammar book and a spell checker.

      Our new processor wordy hqs a spiel chequer it in, but languag bad so is that we not print out even label understandingable to send it back! Until come refound we cant buy new since spreadsheet for finance from same plaice com.

      --
      Beep beep.
    4. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "formatting, grammar, spelling", dickweed.

    5. Re:Okay... by Delusional · · Score: 2, Informative
      Dear Slashdot "Editors"... Please for christmas, can Santa bring you all an unabridged grammar book and a spell checker.

      Excuse me Mr Pot, but the Kettle has asked me to point out that:

      1. Christmas should be capitalized. Regardless of your feelings on the subject, it is the proper name of a holiday.
      2. ... Santa bring you all... should be Santa bring you each (unless of course you meant that one would suffice for all of them, in which case the "all" is extraneous)
      3. You are using "can" where "may" belongs, which is generally acceptable in modern usage, BUT
      4. ...you are, in essence, asking the direct object of your sentence if the subject of the sentence will perform a certain service. If you want Santa to do something, you should ask Santa.
      A more grammatically appropriate expression of your sentiments is:

      Dear Slashdot "Editors" - I certainly hope each of you has asked Santa for an unabridged grammar reference and a spell-checker for Christmas this year!

      That being said, I rather suspect that the aforementioned editors are primarily responsible for article selection. To expect copy editing from a free and continuously updated website seems just a bit extravagant.

    6. Re:Okay... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks! Imagine that, an actual educational post on Slashdot.

      Keep this up and I fully expect the Sun to go super nova any moment now...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    7. Re:Okay... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      That being said, I rather suspect that the aforementioned editors are primarily responsible for article selection. To expect copy editing from a free and continuously updated website seems just a bit extravagant.

      Rubbish. The editors are paid staff. Each uploads 4 or 6 stories per day. Each story is average 1-2 paragraphs. It takes approximately 5 seconds to spellcheck and correct that much text (if the submitted text is particularly bad or long, up to 30 seconds -- I know this as despite having excellent language skills, I edit professionally, my typing sucks, I have to check everything I write). If each editor spent TWO MINUTES a day spellchecking, most of the embarrassing crap we see would be gone. If they spent an additional 20 seconds to run a few obvious terms through their site search, they'd eliminate most of the dupes.

      I once edited a news site and uploaded about 80 stories a day, each average several paragraphs. Many of these came from writers who didn't speak English as a first language. I fixed them because I gave a shit about professional standards.

    8. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, it's fucking ar-goddamn-tistic expression! Look hard and long enough, and you're bound to discover some profound, moving, thought for which those words happen to be a perfect fit! Only then will we realize the genius of their author. Know that you are in the midst of greatness, here, and shudder in fear.

    9. Re:Okay... by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      I'm not Santa, But my last name is Rudolph (like the reindeer... seriously it is) and I got a Spell Checker for him.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    10. Re:Okay... by The+Lion+of+Comarre · · Score: 1

      Dear Slashdot "Editors" - I certainly hope each of you has asked Santa for an unabridged grammar reference and a spelling checker for Christmas this year!

  10. Point and Click Linuxcomes with version XXXXXXXXXX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Point and Click Linuxcomes with version XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

    Does it come with a parental advisory?

  11. 1337 by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Funny
    ( Read More... | 13777 bytes in body | 10 comments | books.slashdot.org )
    (Emphasis mine)

    This Linux book is 1337!
    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:1337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, with the one 3 in there, I'd say the book is more of a 13777-down.

  12. Re:If you think linux is hard... by edraven · · Score: 1

    And for those tasks for which no-one has seen fit to write a manual... just become a subject expert and WTFM.

    Whatever.

  13. inappropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's inappropriate for Slashdot to review its boss's book. Far better is to wait for someone else (not related) to review it then link to the review with a disclaimer.

    1. Re:inappropriate by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More than half of all slashdot articles are thinly veiled advertisements.

      Either it's a link to one of Apple's press releases, or to Roland Piquepilles blog, etc..

      This is not really any different.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:inappropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed that. They had a Suicide Girls article and that's one of their advertisers. Most of the people who post are probably paid monkeys and anyone with any real thoughts are modded down to oblivion.

    3. Re:inappropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain Suicide Girls started advertising after the article. On the other hand perhaps they advertised before but slashdot readers started paying attention to the site and submitted the article that was covered in many places also frequented by /. readers. I would like to believe the eds are just slow and out of step with their own site rather than paid monkeys.

    4. Re:inappropriate by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Right. God forbid a site promotes products that have been developed by its maintainers. If you're looking for objective reporting, you've come to the wrong place though. But if you hadn't figured that out already, nothing I say is likely to enlighten you.

  14. Mepis is a step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Mepis live CD (in my experience) is the most usable and /user land freindly Linux around. The fact that all the tools work out of the box is amazing. The sorting of dependancy issues has become the biggest hurdle in Linux acceptance. The fact that you do not have to ./configure --with to get a running install puts Mepis light years ahead of other distros. I predict that some will actually pay for this distro.

    There is one problem with the KDE alsa user permissions, when you create a new user after install. A easier to understand root user permission tool might help, so one would not have to understand unix group and user permissions. If the Gui had a more bonehead simple help file the issue would go away. Of course typing $man ls -l or $man chown before you su to create a new account does help. But how can someone who is a small buisiness who needs an alternative to the MS treadmill afford the time to learn these things? That said I firmly believe that prepackaged Mepis like Linux distros are the future.

    1. Re:Mepis is a step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that all the tools work out of the box is amazing. The sorting of dependancy issues has become the biggest hurdle in Linux acceptance

      Some RPM-based distributions have had problems with that, but you can't blame Linux for that; Debian has by far the smoothest dependency handling of any system, commercial or non-commercial. You don't need MEPIS for that (although it may be a nice distribution in its own right).

    2. Re:Mepis is a step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mepis install is by far the best I have seen, by keeping to the KISS principle it makes the change over from MS a breeze. What I meant was that an office out of the box Linux distro with no added software and all the permissions set right in the first place, could really put Linux into a position of competition in the small business computing world.

    3. Re:Mepis is a step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, I didn't encounter any of those dependency problems since I installed my distribution, so, since a few _years_.

      You know why ? Because I don't compile my programs. And most people don't compile their programs. At least, not the people who want a point&click OS. Those people use package managers, and package managers take care of dependencies.

      If you don't believe it works, then give it a try. I can only talk about apt (I use both Debian and Ubuntu), but it really works. And there's no such thing under Windows, which makes it much harder to use.

  15. Two, two, two drives in one! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If any readers run into the same problem I did, and can't just shrug and toss Windows completely, my happy-overkill advice would be to invest in a second hard drive and skip all the hassles of dual- or multi-booting.

    This is exactly how I have my primary box set up. Are you suggesting that newbies open their cases and swap drive plugs when they want to change OSes? (Been there. Done that.)

    If not, how on earth does it save one from dual booting?

    Methinks you had some other concept in mind, relating to partitioning a single drive, but the way it came out a newbie reading it would end up confused beyond redemption.

    KFG

    1. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by Lethyos · · Score: 1
      Are you suggesting that newbies open their cases and swap drive plugs when they want to change OSes? (Been there. Done that.)

      If only we had some sort of software that allowed us to specify which devices (virtual or otherwise) to boot from when the system comes up...

      --
      Why bother.
    2. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most bios have that option now. on my current motherboard its f11 on boot.

    3. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only we had some sort of software that allowed us to specify which devices (virtual or otherwise) to boot from when the system comes up...

      Yeah, that would be pretty slick. Someone should grub around a bit with that idea. Then we could dual boot.

      KFG

    4. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by handslikesnakes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some sort of Linux loader? Hmmm, that's an interesting idea.

    5. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh - face!

    6. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some sort of Linux loader? Hmmm, that's an interesting idea.

      Yeah, exactly. Someone should Stitch one up.

      KFG

    7. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Yup, it'd be like a Silo we could launch different operating systems from.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    8. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using cheap Vipower IDE hard drive swap racks since 1999. If you have a free drive bay it allows complete seperation of drives.
      WHY don't people advocate this more?

    9. Re:Two, two, two drives in one! by briber · · Score: 1

      Dual booting is a software solution wherein two or more operating systems available for booting a computer. The selection is made early in the systems bootup by having the user choose from options presented by GRUB, Lilo, XOSL, BootMagic, or a host of other SOFTWARE solutions.
      What the OP was looking for was a hardware solution to the problem. With a purely hardware solution, there is no danger of one operating system stepping on another. Indeed, neither operating system would be able to see the partitions of the other.
      Such a hardware solution exists today: http://www.tweakhound.com/reviews/drives/trios2/
      -Briber

  16. Reminds me of.... by skids · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that guy with the late-night infomercials who calls himself "the Computer Doctor" or somesuch nonsense. You know: "...and the lesson plays like a regular video on top of the application, so you can work along."

    The last ad I saw from him, he was hawking a CD tutoring on "avoiding identity theft" of which he said "I decided to do this special CD because I was recently a victim myself."

    Now THERE's a guy you should be taking advice from.

    (Actually having stupid users write tech tutorials isn't that bad. Only they understand the problems of other stupid users firsthand.)

    1. Re:Reminds me of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Actually having stupid users write tech tutorials isn't that bad. Only they understand the problems of other stupid users firsthand.)

      So why are you bitching???

    2. Re:Reminds me of.... by skids · · Score: 1

      Because it is the basic civil right I cherish the most. See http://abrij.org/~bri/rants/. I plan to bitch a whole lot more there in the future, too. Life just isn't worth living unless you can bitch about it.

  17. Raise Time? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

    That should get him at least 2% more on the ol' annual review...

    Good review, but still funny that its his boss's book lol.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  18. An early snag by proverbialcow · · Score: 4, Informative

    An early snag: Chapter 4's instructions on reformatting a hard drive to let Windows and Linux both exist happily on the same PC didn't work for me. I was installing onto a brand new hard drive, and I thought I'd give dual-booting a shot to see what Windows was like nowadays, and so followed the instructions on setting up a machine to dual-boot.

    That's because Linux doesn't play well with NTFS (mounts it read-only), and NTFS (or some variant thereof) lies under WinXP. If you were truly starting with a new hard drive, your best bet is to set up your partitions ahead of time, install XP where you want XP and Linux where you want Linux.

    Messing around with the partition-size probably hosed whatever checksum XP does on the partition, and it refused to boot from it.

    Not really newbie-friendly, is it? :)

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:An early snag by SkjeggApe · · Score: 1

      Win XP also generates a "unique id" of sorts to identify your system. Changing certain things, like the partionsize could be hosing this as well. VMWare has solved this problem, and offers to "recalculate" the unique id for you.

    2. Re:An early snag by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe the parent meant this, but I want to make it obvious.

      From my experience, if you are going to make a new drive dual boot you *must* install Windows first. Then install any alternate OS's you want with it.

      Windows will not respect your boot loader, and stick its own (which will only recognize FAT and NTFS partitions typically) in the MBR.

      As a side note, some newer machines I received from Gateway had a interesting BIOS feature where if you had grub or lilo modify the MBR the machine would crash at the BIOS splash screen. If you show the post messages it never gets to where it detects the drives. The only way I could repair it was to remove the drive, format it on an OS X machine as a 'Unix' volume, then install XP, and install linux over XP making sure not to let it change the MBR at all.

      What a pain.

    3. Re:An early snag by Taladar · · Score: 1
      Linux doesn't play well with NTFS (mounts it read-only)
      AFAIK Windows doesn't play well with any non-MS Filesystem (doesn't even recognize them as filesystems, not to mention mounting them) so Users might want to ask themselves who is behind the other. (I know you probably know this, I just thought I'd mention it)
    4. Re:An early snag by NeoDot · · Score: 1

      The trick is to boot the older 2.4 (NOT-2.6) Kernel and then use QTparted for a NTFS resize (Mepis 2004.4). This way you don't even have to defrag Windows beforehand. The 2.6 is not compatable (yet) and this required boot is ONLY for resizing of NTFS. ...using the MEPIS 2004.4 CD.

      I did it so be carfull about scaring off newbies.

      All you need to be able to do is create a swap and "/" partition via QTparted (Partition Magic clone).

      If this is two hard for someone then they simply need to order a 2nd hard drive and plug it in first.

      BTW If you already have a suitable 2nd partition made under Windows and you can erase it, use that.

      As always, it is wise to back up first! I did not need my backup.

      I have never encountered a ill willed Linux installer so watch the FUD as Microsoft is very nervous nowadays. Also and in fact it is MS that dosesn't play well with others.

    5. Re:An early snag by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      I have never encountered a ill willed Linux installer so watch the FUD as Microsoft is very nervous nowadays. Also and in fact it is MS that dosesn't play well with others.

      What I meant to say is "NTFS is not as well-supported as XFS, JFS, FAT, FAT-32, QNX partitions, etc." I've never had an ill-willed Linux installer, either. If anything, I've had installers that are TOO compliant, even when I didn't know what I was doing.

      For example, using cfdisk to resize a FAT-32 partition, even after defragging it. In theory, it should have worked. Not so much, though.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    6. Re:An early snag by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Linux has been able to read/write NTFS fine for at least a year now, using Microsoft's own driver. Google for captive NTFS.

    7. Re:An early snag by jrutley · · Score: 1

      My guess is that he didn't set a hard drive setting in the BIOS to LBA instead of Auto. He didn't say what the error was, but it's probably Grub error 17.

    8. Re:An early snag by kido9797 · · Score: 1

      Agree, it doesn't recognise the Chinese filename..... I have all MP3s in the NTFS partition and I can't get them out using Mepis...

    9. Re:An early snag by bfree · · Score: 1

      I believe you need to load the appropriate nls modules for you language.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    10. Re:An early snag by Travy.b · · Score: 0

      Messing around with the partition-size probably hosed whatever checksum XP does on the partition, and it refused to boot from it.

      I had two hard drives both formatted as windows drives. I ran QTparted and reformatted a part of one to ext3. I then also found out that windows wouldn't load from grub, I looked into it.

      Turns out all I needed to do was change grubs windows boot from hd1 to hd0. Not sure why it chose hd1 in the first place... but all works fine now.

    11. Re:An early snag by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      You see, the difference between the two sides, though, is that EXT2, EXT3, Reiser, etc, are all open-sourced, so MS could support them if they wanted to. NTFS is closed-source, and the only way we've been able to get as much support as we have so far is through reverse-engineering.

    12. Re:An early snag by makomk · · Score: 1

      I accessed the exact same feature without involving Linux at all - just re-arranged some partitions with PartitionMagic 6. I think it may have been something to do with a BIOS bug in the LBA detection. Anyway, am I right in thinking that, if you tell the BIOS a hard disk doesn't exist, Linux can still access it? Because if so - obvious workaround.

  19. Nope by Moth7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That clearly says "let" - the book must be pretty basic ;-)

    <groans />

    1. Re:Nope by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! BAHAHAHAHA!

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up!! mod parent up!!

    3. Re:Nope by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      No, it clearly says llet, which means milk in at least one language.

      Though how to interpret this cryptic reference to dairy products, I don't know.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
  20. I Don't Think So Tim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was he looking over your shoulder and threatening you with unemployment when you typed that?

    If he won't fire Michael Sims, he won't fire anybody.

  21. Why write a book on "easy to use linux"? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    Every bit of information in it will be obsolete by the time the next build is out.

    Why document linux/oss at all? There are so many inconsistencies between versions of all the major oss projects you may as well just keep starting from scratch.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Why write a book on "easy to use linux"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you may as well just keep starting from scratch."

      Correct. That's what man and headers are for.

    2. Re:Why write a book on "easy to use linux"? by Taladar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even though Windows claims to be binary-backwards-compatible and probably even is better in this department than Linux the User-Interface has gone through more changes than most Linux UIs. Sure, KDE isn't FvWM but if you take a Windows 3.11 User and put them in front of a Windows XP PC he wouldn't have much of a clue what to do either at first. At least with Linux the commandline interface and most mature apps are relatively stable (KDE and Gnome are not mature at the current stage). Windows adds new bells and whistles in every version even without good reason. Changes in mature Linux Apps just occur when there is a good reason for it.

  22. Look... by rewt66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the video has a session on "here's what 'put the CD in the drive' looks like", then that's aimed below the Windows-knowing to the totally-computer-ignorant. If you already know Windows well enough to know how to put a CD in and click the mouse on stuff, you don't need the video. And if you don't know how to put a CD in, no OS in the world can help you with that step...

  23. Re:An early snag selling feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Messing around with the partition-size probably hosed whatever checksum XP does on the partition, and it refused to boot from it.

    Since when is hosing an XP install a problem, though good old dd with dev urandom works better. I love breaking windows been doin' it ever since I was a kid.

  24. Re:woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is from Timofee. So I'm not surprised.

  25. MOD PARENT DOWN by puddpunk · · Score: 1

    Here's why:

    Rosco seems to think that point and click == Windows. It seems to me that your calling "bullcrap" to point-and-click linux because it doesn't have a 0 learning curve when your coming from windows.

    Your mum would take a week or so to become fully productive in an OS such as OSX which some configure to be the most usable operating system in existance. Is OSX bullcrap?

    Do yourself (or your mother) a favour. Buy a box of SUSE 9.2 (personal is nice, pro has more apps) or MEPIS, read the manuals, play with it a little and then you can stand there and tell me that point-and-click linux is bullcrap.

  26. Who needs endorsements? by SunPin · · Score: 3, Funny
    You can probably tell already whether Point and Click Linux is suited for you, and the answer is likely No.

    Timothy... you're fired. :)

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  27. Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by totallygeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Once a Linux system is properly configured, there really is not much to keeping it up and going. I would much rather place a computer novice on a Linux system than deal with that user on a Windows machine with all its updates against spyware and viruses.

    1. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by RangerFish · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight - you find Windows Updates complex? Well, let's see now... Go to www.windowsupdate.com. Wow, that was hard, wasn't it?

    2. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by totallygeek · · Score: 1
      Let me get this straight - you find Windows Updates complex?


      Yes. When you must be constantly patching things and find out that your update isn't working because of some spyware...

    3. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by RangerFish · · Score: 1

      Set up your computer to have anti-spy protection. You have antivirus protection and a firewall don't you?

    4. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by totallygeek · · Score: 1
      Set up your computer to have anti-spy protection. You have antivirus protection and a firewall don't you?


      No, I don't. I don't run Windows -- at home or at work. But, I see people all the time that cannot figure out why their systems simply have stopped working the way they used to. They find out that they clicked the wrong thing, and *poof*, the system now sucks.


      It is amazing to me that sometimes just hooking up a piece of equipment to a computer sends it over the edge. There is no explanation you can give to Windows users regarding the problems they encounter when they ask, "I installed X software and now my machine is slow or locks up." This appears to be a Microsoft-only phenomenon. When I install something on another operating system, I get anticipated results. When something is amiss, you can easily backtrack to fix the problem.

    5. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      That's because X isn't for Windows, it's for *NIX!

    6. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by RangerFish · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I could manage what you describe with Windows or Linux with equal ease. The only reason it's harder to install bad software on Linux is that it's harder to install software, full stop. Just because you don't run Windows doesn't mean you don't need security measures. I seriously doubt that your Linux system is as secure, as efficient, or as stable as my Windows XP system, just because I've taken sensible security and maintenance measures.

    7. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by borkus · · Score: 1

      Updating Windows isn't hard, but nor does it help me accomplish the things that I desire with my computer. It doesn't entertain me, it doesn't manange my finances, it doesn't help me communicate with friends. If I have a PC with Windows XP, windows update takes fifteen to thirty minutes of my time in order to meet the computer's needs rather than having the computer do what I want it to do.

      Apple has a similar update. However, I find that it involves less attention from me and also tends to interrupt me less in the middle of my regular computer use.

    8. Re:Easy of Linux vs Complexity of Windows Updates by RangerFish · · Score: 1

      Now, that makes more sense. Personally, playing games and browsing the web is what I usually use my computer for. Browsing the web is fine, but Linux isn't very good on the games front, at least not the games that I want to play. So by that token, Linux doesn't do what I look for in an OS, while Windows does, which is why I use Windows. It's also possible that my Minidisc player only has software for Windows (I haven't looked for Linux software for it).

      For that reason, I'm willing to go through the extra hassle of large updates.

  28. no, it isn't by jeif1k · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it isn't. I'm sorry that you evidently don't understand why, but this is not the forum to discuss why there is a large number of people that prefer the Linux UI to the Macintosh UI. Given the immense amount of advocacy from people like you, you can rest assured that they are more than aware of the alternative and have made their choice deliberately.

  29. It's a secret code. by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you take the misspelled letters and line them up as instructed in the Necrowombicon, the "errors" spell out the following message:
    My boss is making me review his book, and even I can't muster any enthusiasm for the fetid piece of crap. Send help: he has my family.
  30. Re:bi2nAtch by LilMikey · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am sofa king we todd ed.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  31. Re:Okay...not inglish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I'm generally not a nut about formatting, grammar, or spelling but my god. That review was like an unholy trifecta of the English language gone terribly wrong."

    He speaketh /.dinglish.

    An American dialect of type written origin. Some say this was cured by grammer and spellchecking algorythms. In olden times one learned grammer and spelling. Historically American schools actually once taught academic subjects, before the advent of modern Windows point and click diction.

  32. Point and Click Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's it!
    I'm off to GNU/Hurd

  33. Re:Who is Roblimo? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    I laughed my head off when I read that too - such brown-nosing bullshit. Timothy is a wanker.

  34. It does make sense. by uberdave · · Score: 1

    You are starting the shutdown procedure

  35. we should go against unfamiliar=scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's the cause of a lot of trouble in this world.

  36. dude, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that a dell?

  37. MOD PARENT UPWARDS by Zen+Punk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mod parent up!!!!!!~1!!eleventy-one

    --
    Sleep is futile.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UPWARDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And up!

  38. Mepis by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Interesting. As I loaded /. I was burning a freshly downloaded .iso of Mepis. I need to bring it home to my parents on Thankgiving vacation to do a little rescue, and perhaps a little showing off.

  39. Re:Okay...not inglish by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    As much as I'd like to agree with you, Microsoft and Windows weren't a glint in anyone's eyes when the decline of the American school system began.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  40. Re:An early snag or Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Gateway had a interesting BIOS feature where if you had grub or lilo modify the MBR the machine would crash at the BIOS splash screen. If you show the post messages it never gets to where it detects the drives."

    Bet this is a trusted computing Pheonix-Microsoft feature . I seem to remember Pheonix and MS hooking up on the trusted computing intiative.

  41. Who made him King? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well I never voted for 'im

    1. Re:Who made him King? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sigh! Basic living 101:

      Nobody votes for a king, they just show up one day and proclaim to be King, and as long as nobody challenges them, they stay King.

    2. Re:Who made him King? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arthur: "You don't vote for Kings! ... The lady of the lake held aloft Excalibur, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to be your king."

      Peasant: "Listen, supreme executive power is derived from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. If I went 'round claiming to be Emperor because a moistened bink had lugged a scimitar at me, they put me away!"

      (sorry, it's all from memory from *years* ago).

  42. Hello, Mr Pot. Meet Mr. Kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet you still found time to comment...

  43. Re:So where is the free download? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    Although a supercilious comment such as yours should be modded to oblivion, a definition of supercilious should suffice.

  44. Parted, 2.6 and a non-bootable win partition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There is a known problem with the combination of specific version of parted, the 2.6 kernel, LBA disks and certain bioses. From what I've read, due to changes in how the 2.6 kernel "sees" the partition table, parted creates a munged partition table that will happily boot linux but results in a dead windows partition. To avoid this, you can upgrade libparted or simply create the partitions using fdisk before running the install utility.

    1. Re:Parted, 2.6 and a non-bootable win partition by zpok · · Score: 1

      Now why was I expecting this?

      "in order to do it right, undress, dance around at full moon and eat twelve frogs." ;-

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
  45. He proved the problems point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mere fact that there has to be a book and a DVD to show people how easy linux is, is a complete usability contradiction. Here is a quick lesson about what users do. 1. They just want to turn it on and start working on it. 2. They do not want to read a damn thing. This is sad but true.

    So if an operating system needs a manual to start using it, it is unusable. Mac OS X is a great example, the manual they have is less than 40 pages. Why? Because for new users, it makes sense.

  46. Re:In other news, put Mepis on it now!: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In two years it will be an expensive boat anchor unless you put MEPIS on it, Mepis makes the cooolest linux box yet. However I digress, if your bios is a phoenix-MS trusted computing one you will need to trick it to run anything other than what you have permission to run. You better hurry up and register your copy of xp home then hope you do not have to reinstall more than 3 times when you screw it up trying to run a real OS.

  47. Re:If you think linux is hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man-files aren't very newbie-friendly.

  48. We should add "Go" to the start menus for newbies! by Anderlan · · Score: 1

    Yah, the fact that the Start icon doesn't say it's a start icon has always annoyed me, too. In my fvwm, I had a little running stick figure icon with the simple, and short, 2 letters "GO!" on it. In Gnome, before so many configuration options were thrown out, I made the Gnome foot be the "G" in "Go!" Distros, desktop environments, and software vendor desktops (eg novell's liitle java desktop on X) all have their little logo where the start menu. It wouldn't be too much intrusion to help the average user out and add a "Go" or the more playful "Go!" next to the logo!

    --
    KLAATU, BORADA, NIh*ahem*
  49. Can you say Conflict of Interest by DarthBobo · · Score: 1

    This is really inappropriate commercial shilling.

    --
    +--------------------- You idiot! I told you we were facing the wrong way!
  50. ahahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good show, sir, good show.

  51. Re:We should add "Go" to the start menus for newbi by LuSiDe · · Score: 1
    (eg novell's liitle java desktop on X)

    Not to nitpick, but i think you meant Sun's JDS (Java Desktop System).
    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  52. Re:Who made him King? (no watery tarts) by whitroth · · Score: 1

    So anyone 'o walks up and announces 'imself king is one? You mean, like I can announce "I am king of the US", and tell Georgie-poo to leave the White 'Ouse, and I don't even need some obscure ritual with a watery tart?

    mark "the Baron of NASA is sitting
    next to me...."

  53. Re:We should add "Go" to the start menus for newbi by Anderlan · · Score: 1

    novell has one too. very limited. just a desktop and some novell admin apps. java's been around long enough for more than a few ppl to have whipped up a wm and a taskbar/panel with it. (what i noticed that was a little cool was that it just used xfree, like you might expect it to)

    --
    KLAATU, BORADA, NIh*ahem*
  54. Woo hoo! by AstroSurf · · Score: 2, Funny
    but I never did get it to boot into Windows.

    Alright! Feature #1! I'm sold. :)

    --
    Astro
  55. Wow... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

    Someone actually wasted mod points on a post poking fun of a goatse... nice.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Re:Cheaper here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Affiliate link in post. Mod Amazon money spammer down.

  58. Glad to see some positive reviews by masinick · · Score: 1

    I am very pleased to see people giving MEPIS some attention, and some positive attention at that. While MEPIS certainly owes a debt of gratitude to Knoppix for the outstanding work that has been accomplished on that project, I've been suggesting and recommending SimplyMEPIS to anyone who wants to try out a Linux system for the first time with little risk. More than that, though, I've been recommending SimplyMEPIS to moderately experienced Linux users who want to learn how to use a Debian-based system effectively. SimplyMEPIS is simply one very fine desktop system. It installs effortlessly, has a well chosen set of default applications, and it doesn't get in your way, should you happen to be an experienced user that just wants to use a Live CD as a quick way to install a flexible system.

    I recommend SimplyMEPIS, not just to beginners, not just to Linux enthusiasts, but for anyone who wants an immediately useful and usable desktop system, but for people who ALSO want to expand, extend, customize, and build a flexible desktop computer system. This is as close to an ideal way to start as you can get right now.

    --
    Brian Masinick, masinick at yahoo dot com Linux
  59. Look at the other responses to this question... by thecampbeln · · Score: 1
    ...and you will see why Linux will be held out of the mainstream for a few years more (if not longer) not by Microsoft, but by Linux supporters! For the love of god people, coddle the nubies! Give them all the help you can give! Every time you put on this holier-then-thou bravado it only hurts Linux.

    These responses should not be centered around the ideas that "fuck, you mom is stupid" and "well cars aren't all the same". These responses should be pointing to themes that are windows-esque or at least designed with an eye towards ex-windows users.

    Sure, maybe when the computer has been around for 100-ish years or to the people who have had computers around them all their life could you make those arguments, but for the general populus it's only been around for 20-odd years. People used to jump out of the way of trains that were shown on movie screens, people used to refuse to ride in cars... why? Because it wasn't something they grew up with, it was something completely new to them.

    Teaching someone how to drive an automatic car, then giving them a stick (manual) car and berating them for not being able to do it is not constructive. Some people are quite literally afraid of their computers (just like people were afraid of movies, photographs, cars, etc, etc). Is their fear logical? No, but that doesn't mean you can discount it either. If you can only feel superior by putting some else down, then please, for the benefit of humanity, shut the hell up. For those of you who can offer HELP to someone asking for it, please, do it without exerting your superiority over them... else one day they simply won't ask anymore.

    --
    "1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
  60. Outstanding! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Someone who knows the pain I've went through trying to get someone weened off of Windows and made something usefull.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  61. Re:Who made him King? (no watery tarts) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good magic sword might be helpful...