Slashdot Mirror


Toyota Demos 'Partner Robots'

angryflute writes "Toyota has created a walker robot that the driver sits in and controls. It's meant for handicapped people to get around with, but you can easily see the potential for this technology to become the basis for a real-world version of an AT-ST Scout Walker or mobile suit Gundam -- just add guns!" Gizmodo has some more pictures.

30 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Only in Japan by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Robots this cool and bizarre could only come from Japan. Normally, I am a fan of form following function, but am reminded in these robots of everything cool about design from a Japanese ethic. Their principal application of providing the handicapped with greater mobility is one that we are familiar with in our lab. One of our fellows is in a wheelchair (polio) and sometimes accessibility is still a problem for him, particularly obtaining things that are above his reach. Certainly the Segway folks have worked in this area before, but their form absolutely followed function and had very little of the design sensibility of Toyotas products. I also can find almost nothing on their site about products for the handicapped anymore. What happened? Has Segway abandoned all their accessibility products in favor of the HT?

    Also, I imagine that since the US Army has an overriding interest in enhancing personal mobility, that they too will be paying Toyota a visit.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Only in Japan by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 2, Informative

      To answer your question about accessibility products:
      "When and where can I purchase an IBOT(TM) Mobility System?
      Although the IBOT(TM) was invented and developed at DEKA, Independence Technology, a division of Johnson & Johnson, will be marketing and selling the IBOT(TM). Please consult their website, www.indetech.com for questions regarding price and availability"

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    2. Re:Only in Japan by krymsin01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When automobile (think: tanks) were introduced during world war I to the battle field, they were highly impractical and were considered an imparement rather that as a tacticle avantage.

      --
      stuff
    3. Re:Only in Japan by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, one of the "robots" looks like she's sitting in a huge wheeled vagina.


      You say that like it's a bad thing...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  2. Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What the hell. Seriously, when is Japan going to stop bogarting the good acid?

    Aside from that, the assisted mobility thing is going to be a big, big market in the next couple of decades as the baby boomers start hitting the wall (assuming they aren't actually staring down an extra 900 years of life by then). While I seriously hope it won't look much like this given my natural fear of old people in silver spandex, I think we will see a lot of advancement in this field as the money shifts in that direction.

    It's not just limited to mobility, either -- picture a recorder that is always working and allows you to privately review what just happened in your spare moments to aid memory? Heh, maybe you could even mark off when you've told a particular story to spare your loved ones the constant retelling...

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Queer+Boy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The Japanese cultural phenomenon of "cute" is the same cultural phenomenon of "tough" that America has. We put blood and gore and screaming and machismo into everything, and they put bright colours and funny songs and talking animals in everything.

      I find it a refreshing alternative. Frankly I find the "Grand Theft Auto" mindset dull and primitive.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Japanese cultural phenomenon of "cute" is the same cultural phenomenon of "tough" that America has. We put blood and gore and screaming and machismo into everything, and they put bright colours and funny songs and talking animals in everything.

      I find it a refreshing alternative. Frankly I find the "Grand Theft Auto" mindset dull and primitive.


      Oh, that's rich. It must have been the Aztecs who came up with bushido, seppuku, and Sword of Doom. Hmm, perhaps I'll go do a "test cut" on some random peasant I find on the road. Or better yet, watch some lighthearted Japanese anime. Tentacle sex, anyone?

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  3. Cool, but... by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

    DO you have to wear the quasi-futuristic suits to make it work? Handicapped people still have dignity you know.

  4. Coming next, the Shover Robot by mekkab · · Score: 4, Funny

    In order to push bread down their throats.

    Do you have stairs in your house?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  5. Just add guns by zackeller · · Score: 5, Funny

    That phrase has never caused anything bad to happen.

  6. Old People/Walker Robots by tonsofpcs · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Japan, only old people use walker robots.

  7. This made me think of Ripley. by punkin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get away from her, you bitch!

  8. What everybody's thinking... by isugimpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, who's in favor of starting a paypal account for people to donate to so the geeks can get one, mount very large guns on it, and then mount a very small nuclear reactor? Destruction of cities is fun for the whole family!

  9. who are the adwizards who came up with this one by viva_fourier · · Score: 5, Funny

    First couple things I thought of when I saw the conceptual ad:

    1. wtf?
    2. Seriously, wtf?
    3. A new Power Rangers design?
    4. Cheap Peyote hits Tokyo?
    5. Does it come in "Confederate Flag" with a gunrack?

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  10. two words... by nusratt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    bigger doors.

    Didn't RTFA, just looked at the pix.
    But, if these things are to be practical for "handicapped" people, buildings will need MUCH bigger doors, wider aisles between office cubicles, wider hallways in homes, and higher ceilings in many places -- not to mention bigger cargo doors in personal vans, etc.

  11. Too tall, too wide, too long by LeiGong · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Am I the only one that notice just how tall, wide, and long these things are? They would be impractical to use for any day-to-day operation. The standing robot looks to be 8' tall and its feet looks to be 1'x2'. It would hardly be able to climb stairs with ease. Doorways, staircases, and almost all archways in Japan are smaller and more cramped than their US counter-part. I just don't see this thing fitting into a Japanese-sized apartment or office.

    The other robotic device would need to run on the street because it looks 50% larger than our current electric wheelchairs and is about as long as motorcycle. I mean sure they look cool and sound great. But when you consider its practical applications, especially in Japan, it's just rediculous.

    And WTF is up with that chick dressed up in the white latex suit?!? I mean really...WTF?!?

    1. Re:Too tall, too wide, too long by nativespeaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one that notice just how tall, wide, and long these things are?

      Well...I'm guessing that the initial conversation went something like this:

      Japanese Engineer: Hey, boss - - would it be ok if I took a couple years off the Prius team and started making Mecha?
      Japanese Boss: I'm sorry...that sounds like a terrible waste of time and company resources.
      Japanese Engineer: Ah...yes. You're right. On an unrelated note, have you seen these designs for...uh...Assisted Mobility Vehicles that I've been working on?
      Japanese Boss: Very impressiv...wait...what's this, an EMP gun??
      Japanese Engineer: Personal protection. Old people are weak, and...old.
      Japanese Boss: Well, I'm sold. Whip up a psychedelic butterfly show while you're at it.

  12. It's the wrong trousers, Gromit! by yroJJory · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and they've gone wrong!

    --
    Jory
  13. Something's Missing by Solstice · · Score: 2, Funny

    So when do the robots start fighting? Do all three models join together to form a larger robot?

  14. Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A friend of mine, who ironically is a tanker in the military fully believes that robotech battlemechs will one day be a reality. Surprisingly, he does not realize that one of the advantages that a tank has is a low profile. Granted, it does not have legs to walk around with, so it a little less mobile. However, if you are dealing with insurgents who have RPG's, or even other tanks, having a high profile is BAD. Even if you had armor that was strong enough to withstand multiple hits, the sheer force of a hit would cause a mech to topple, or at the very least lose balance.

    While large mechs would be cool, they would be all to prone to getting blown up. Just giant walking targets. Now, smaller mechs, about the size of an Abrams would be mobile, and act as armor for troops would be more practical than building size robots - but Giant Mechs? Not likely. (All the above is assuming you over come all the other physical limits such as structural stress etc...)

    Mech wheelchairs are a good idea however.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mr Flibble writes:
      A friend of mine, who ironically is a tanker in the military fully believes that robotech battlemechs will one day be a reality. Surprisingly, he does not realize that one of the advantages that a tank has is a low profile. Granted, it does not have legs to walk around with, so it a little less mobile. However, if you are dealing with insurgents who have RPG's, or even other tanks, having a high profile is BAD. Even if you had armor that was strong enough to withstand multiple hits, the sheer force of a hit would cause a mech to topple, or at the very least lose balance. While large mechs would be cool, they would be all to prone to getting blown up. Just giant walking targets. Now, smaller mechs, about the size of an Abrams would be mobile, and act as armor for troops would be more practical than building size robots - but Giant Mechs? Not likely. (All the above is assuming you over come all the other physical limits such as structural stress etc...)

      I think this view is a bit narrow. Battle mech-style exosuits would be more of a "bridging the gap between infantry mobility and heavy armor's offensive ability" thing.

      Suppose you had a mech that only allowed for a 2x profile of a human but could increase their firepower by 2x, increase their ability to take fire by 6x and let them travel 3x faster.

      These things are always compromises. It may very well be that a modern Abrams is more-or-less the pinnacle of current "heavy armor," but that doesn't mean there isn't a middle ground that can be covered.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    2. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by bedurndurn · · Score: 3, Funny

      + Built in autodoc to automatically release anti-coagulant over any detected gunshot wound, and coolant/soothing cream over any burn.

      That makes the whole NASA fubar of switching metric/imperial units seem minor by comparison. ;)

    3. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by makohund · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go in between.

      Something capable of 2 legged upright motion.

      But also capable of dropping horizontal to the surface. (Just like a real soldier)

      Like an ant. Give it 6 limbs. Bottom two work as legs when upright, top two as arms. (Perhaps middle pair fold to sides.) Make the back most heavily armoured. Drop to ground to scurry around quickly like an ant, with a low profile. Stand up for longer range vision, more humanoid mobility, etc.

  15. Re:Very impressed with Japan! by renjipanicker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >> Not only does their population have access to the latest and greatest technology That's because they make their tecnology for the benefit of their population. I find it ironic that while one slashdot article spoke of Japan making robots to help their elderly, another article a short while later spoke of the USA creating robots with guns to make the killing process more effecient. How do you know the US does not currently have a better class of robots than these already? Maybe there are, except maybe they are not being used for uncool things like helping elderly folks cross the road...

  16. Personal Vehicles by dokebi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Toyota released a similar vehicle called PM at the Tokyo Auto show while back. I think Toyota is interested in these Personal Vehicles because in emerging markets like China or India, where population is very dense and poor, even small compact cars will be too large and too expensive. And considering how well the small SMART vehicles have done in Europe, I think they believe there is a market for a nimble vehicle sized between a motorcycle and a normal car. I would love to see them try!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  17. Engineering is against it too . . . by Bagheera · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mech vs Tank discussion is one that I've been into too many times to count. Bottom line is Mecha are cool to look at, but inherently too complex to be especially useful on the battlefield. Those knees are going to be inherently more fragile than a tank's suspension, and the point loading on the feet will be higher than with tracks.

    Now, Toyota's application of "walker" technology for aiding the handicapped is exceptionally cool. They've still got to beat the complexity issue (a more or less conventional powered chair is cheaper and less complex) but it IS a clever way to get around the fact that most buildings are designed around people with legs, rather than people with wheels. Power chairs still mostly have trouble with stairs.

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  18. wait'n for the GRITS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not going to be satisfied until the NatalieBot keeps me in as many lapdances and other, um, jobs, as I can pay the electric bill for. Plus, she needs to be able to convince my mom that she's only a phase I'm going through.

  19. Doubt it by SunPin · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is there a way for handicap people to defend against people pushing them over in their new "i-foot"?

    500 lbs. Good luck trying. I hope the handicapped don't crush you for your insolence.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Doubt it by ScaldedTauntaun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, will welcome our new handicapped overlords!

      -ST

  20. Re:DARPA has been looking at exoskeletons.... by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my opinion I think the Darpa mechanized suit idea seems more well suited for most people. You wear it, thus it's not very big compared to the japanese machine you sit it. It looks like it's pretty big, too much for your average japanese home. It could be more suited for industrial purposes though. again, too big for walking around town imo. I'm sure they can make it smaller, very cool stuff.