Slashdot Mirror


Going, Going, Gone: IBM Sells PC Group To Lenovo

It was rumored before, but now, as Rick Zeman writes, "It's official: According to news.com, IBM has sold their PC business in a complex arrangement where, 'under the deal, IBM will keep an 18.9 percent stake in Levono. Lenovo will pay $1.25 billion for the IBM PC unit and assume debt, which will bring the total cost to $1.75 billion. Lenovo will pay roughtly $650 million in cash and $600 million in securities.' Plus, Lenovo will be able to use the IBM and Think names for 5 years."

27 of 576 comments (clear)

  1. Get a Gateway by omarius · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a damn expensive IBM PC unit. The clones are a lot cheaper, people.

    1. Re:Get a Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Uh, what? They didn't buy a PC, they bought a whole PC Business.
      *------- Joke.

      O ----- You.
      -|-
      /\
    2. Re:Get a Gateway by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      (don't even bring up Apple, people - if you do, you have no idea what you're talking about)

      I take umbrage at that. You see, I used to work for IBM. I've had a number of ThinkPads over the years. I also currently own an Apple PowerBook. And I'd easily put this system in the same league as the ThinkPad (if not slightly higher -- where most modern ThinkPads are designed primarily as Windows systems, Apple's boxes are at least Unix based).

      If you don't lock yourself into a specific architecture, you can see that Apple's PowerBooks easily rank up there with IBM's ThinkPads. Indeed, these are the only two companies for a very long time who have done any significant R&D into laptop usability. I'd pit my PowerBook against an Intel-based laptop any day.

      I guess this is why they've only got a five year window to brand them as IBM Thinkpads - IBM doesn't want their name sullied as part of the deal. Which begs the question, what's really in it for Levono? What do they do in year six?

      In year one I imagine they'll use the IBM name. In year two they'll introduce some models under their own name in certain parts of the world. In years two through five they'll brand their systems under both the IBM and Lenovo names at the same time (ie: both logos on the boxes).

      The idea being they'll wean their customers into thinking of their brand name as being equivalent to the IBM brand name. They have five years to do so -- an eternity in Internet time.

      The questions becomes -- will it be successful, or will five years from now people be talking about the "good old days" when IBM made their PCs with quality and usability in mind.

      Lenovo is buying a lot of expertise for their money in this area, so maybe they'll be able to pull it off. Or maybe not. Personally, I'm an Apple guy now for my laptops, so I couldn't really care less :).

      Yaz.

    3. Re:Get a Gateway by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative
      Let's look again.

      2. 2. They dont have a "middle" size powerbook. They go from tiny 12 to large 15+. Where is the 14 ?

      The 15 is the middle size. Apple also sells a lunch tray version. Don't believe me? Walk into the cafeteria at Apple some time and you'll see what I mean. 17 inches of usable food tray space. :-D

      3. What the hell is the deal with the speakers being next to the keyboard ?

      Simple. It gives you bass response that doesn't suck. Of course, some might suggest moving the speakers to the screen, but it turns out that clear speakers are neither. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Get a Gateway by Trackster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [rant] I agree. I've read most of the posts on this story and most are ignorant accusations that Lenovo will bring down the quality of IBM products....because OMG! they're a CHINESE company.

      Yet, if most of these posters took a look under and inside their laptops and even PCs (even the ones with "IBM" stamped on them) they'll likely find big fat "Made in China" stickers.

      Folks, China is already the "factory of the world" and for far more than just toys and cloths. Update your mental databases. It's no longer 1980. Toys, apliances, electronics, PCs, car parts, partially assembled automotive units (i.e. suspension) and a host of things you use are made in China and will increasingly be so. In fact, it won't be long (if not already) before many of the cars you drive are entirely built there.

      Being that most people who rant about Chinese quality tend to be 'Merkuns it's rather ironic considering the track record of U.S. manufacturing quality (particularly large corporations). Even Korea's Hyundai has surpassed the big 3 automakers in quality. Remember Hyundai? [/rant]

  2. Reuter's story by wyldeone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reuter's story on this is here.

    --
    In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
    1. Re:Reuter's story by Txiasaeia · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "At least Dell doesn't think outsourcing is all it's cracked up to be. Even seems to think it caused IBM's downfall in the market was because of this."

      And yet, Dell's tech support is in India, whereas IBM's tech support is in the US. Hmm...

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  3. Apex buys Sony next? by Fubar411 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, hard to think the IBM Thinkpad I'm typing on now will be made by the Wal-Mart of computer manufacturers. The FA mentions that Lenovo doesn't spend much on R&D, doubtful they would make drives that survive the 6' fall IBMs do. In my circles, IBM laptops are known as "expensive", "tought", and "secure". Especially since many of them come with BIOS locked biometrics. Sad to see this happen, but I guess the PC market is going commododity.

    1. Re:Apex buys Sony next? by anactofgod · · Score: 4, Informative

      Odd already are that the laptop you are typign on was not manufactured by IBM, but by some contract manufacturer in Asia. IBM has been divesting itself of PC and laptop manufacturing facilities for quite a while now.

      In fact, if one actually read the article, one would see that point being made in...oh...about the thirteenth paragraph. One would also realize that, inspite of the headline and /. synopsis, it's not an actual "sale" of the PC unit. IBM is forming a joint venture with Lenovo, which means that IBM will continue to be involved in the PCs and Thinkpad business for at least a few years.

      --

      ---anactofgod---

      "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    2. Re:Apex buys Sony next? by Lariano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The hard drives in the ThinkPad have for the last year been manufactured by another department IBM sold off, now called Hitachi Global Storage Technologies http://www.hitachigst.com/. These are and will continue to be developed independently from anything Lenovo does, and it's more than likely that Lenovo will continue using these hard drives. So the Lenovo ThinkPads should support about the same falling distances as the ones by IBM.

  4. Re:lenovoepad? by SnowZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm banking on "Thoughtpad". They can use it after the 5 years is up on using the Think brand, and it carries a convenient past tense.

    Will miss not having a T1000 eventually...

  5. driver and support site? by mrbcs · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm curious what effect this will have on the support website. I thought IBM did a great job of fixing their driver site in the last couple years.

    I only buy thinkpads for my own use... I like em better than anything else and they've been very stable and durable for me.

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  6. Most interesting "wild speculation" by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most interesting bizarre theory behind some of this was posed at The Register. They claim that IBM may be interested in buying or allying with Apple. It makes some sense, Apple are certainly one of the big vendors for IBM's Power chips, and it would give them a nice UNIX desktop to push, while giving Apple a little more "corporate credibility" and give them a chance to creep into the business desktop market more.

    Realistically though, I just don't quite see it. I don't think Apple could quite take the image hit that being owned by IBM would entail, nor do I think the gains would really suit IBM that well. Perhaps some sort of closer alliance may result, but I would expect that to be about as far as things go. Still, and interesting but of completely wild speculation.

    Jedidiah.

    1. Re:Most interesting "wild speculation" by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think it's dumb speculation. IBM is focusing-- as it always has-- on business. It's divesting personal computers that have become consumer commodities. Why would it purchase a company whose stock has risen a huge amount based entirely on the profits of a personal music player?

      If not for the stock premium caused by the iPod it might make sense to buy a company known for its superior product design, as IBM focuses on proving more value (and charging higher premiums for it) to clients than the commodities themselves provide, but here it is selling a well-regarded laptop line for a bargain... why would it turn around and by one for a huge premium?

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    2. Re:Most interesting "wild speculation" by mnmn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your comment suddenly made me realize something.

      Add up these facts:

      Apple is powerpc

      IBM is powerpc

      Apple is OSX based on FreeBSD

      IBM spent $1 bil on Linux last year

      Apple competes with Intel and Microsoft

      IBM competes with Intel and Microsoft

      Microsofts apps depend on Intel (Wintel)

      Intel Sales depend on Microsoft OS and apps

      Intel is a monopoly (they still are, declining)

      Microsoft is a monopoly

      IBM and Apple are losers in these monopolies

      IBM has been releasing apps for Linux on pSeries

      Apple has been pushing apps for UNIX on PPC

      IBM supports OSS community, increasing free apps

      Free apps can be compiled on any arch.

      Making sense now?

      No?

      Say Linux goes a bit more mainstream, Opensource apps increase in numbers, especially for powerpc, both IBM and Apple win, Intel and Microsoft lose.

      This is more true of servers than desktops... for now. IBM can take the server share (cheapest pseries now is $6k, with very few under $10k, Apple the desktop share). They both have been depending more and more on opensourced apps and OSes, and have had past alliances (PReP machines), that worked. Both created successful computer lines and are confident in doing the same again. Both have been highly marginalized by Wintel Inc.

      IBM is pretty much getting rid of x86 on desktops, keeping only the x86 on servers. With AMD as a good option, they really dont need Intel for anything now, havent been relying on Microsoft either for much beside xSeries OSes (online catalog shows SLES and Redhat AS as options alongside Win2003).

      The whole industry, at least the bigger players are moving away from the wintel alliance, and we can expect a showdown. Wintel wants the entire market to itself, everyones threatened. Sun, SGI, Novell have seen the light at the end of the tunnel, no reason for them not to join. Apple and IBM must do something while they still have the kick.

      Tell me if I'm way off my base here. I have a premonition of a tech sector mortal kombat with entire vertical architectures against each other, x86+win32 and other arches+other oses. I see IBM moving away from x86, at least from Intel... Athlon64 is too good a deal to turn down.

      Am I wrong or is the Intel+Microsoft alliance just not that threatening?

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    3. Re:Most interesting "wild speculation" by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm with you, Coryoth. IBM and Apple are doing fine in their current relationship. Apple uses IBM chips. IBM pushes businesses to realize that Windows isn't the only OS on the block, which benefits Apple.

      But IBM and Apple are both smart enough to realize that merging two companies with their own unique cultures is a difficult, sometimes impossible task. Bigger is not always better, as IBM learned during their dark years. A loose alliance based on mutual respect is likely far better for both companies.

      Rumors about Apple mating with other companies have been around as long as the Mac has existed. Sun, Disney, Sony, IBM - I wonder who it'll be on the next iteration of the rumor mill.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  7. Re:Quality by liangzai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Try http://www.lenovogrp.com/ (or http://www.lenovo.cn/ if you know Chinese). I think Thinkpad and other IBM gadgets will decrease as much in quality under Lenovo as Volvo has decreased in quality under Ford's oppressive measures (or Saab has under GM's). It's just a transaction of money, estate and control, the quality will depend on wise management, regardless where the production is.

  8. Freedom from MS by bstadil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The main thing IBM is getting is freedom from Microsoft. As long as they had the PC line they couldn't totally piss off MS as they could raise the price on Windows to the Normal level. (MS have done this once)

    This would give them a $50-75 cost disadvantage versus everyone else. Now they can support Linux 100% and leverage the Power / grid architecture into other areas. Incl. making reference designs available to OEMs

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Freedom from MS by T-Ranger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a question of debate, and perspective. MSFT has a higher market cap then does IBM. But for virtually any other business metric, IBM is on top. More revenue, more profit, more employees, more locations. Bigger IP porfolio. Far, far, more lines of products.

      In the desktop PC world, Microsoft may be able to push around anyone, including IBM. Anywhere else, IBM is king. This whole sale is due to the very low margins on desktop PCs, I read somewhere it only brought in about $75mil/year in profits -- far to little for IBM to bother with. If IBM starts a serious Linux push -- they already have the technology in place, just marketing time now (.. the same OS, on your departmental server to your mainframe, backed by IBM...) then they would undoubtably piss of Microsoft. And that very slim margin could evaporate overnight.

  9. Re:Quality by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I think Thinkpad and other IBM gadgets will decrease as much in quality under Lenovo as Volvo has decreased in quality under Ford's"

    So quality is going to go massively up, and the computers will become very trendy and liked instead of mocked by the masses? Sales will increase, and people won't think of their products as boxes anymore.

    Gee this is horrible.

  10. Re:Can someone please clear this up? by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Informative

    This past year IBM's Technology group and their Systems group were merged into the "Systems & Technology Group" (yeah, I know, astoundingly creative) to get better synergy between the semiconductor (technology) and server (systems) parts of the business. The PC division being sold definitely does not include the technology/chips group, whose assets alone greatly exceed $1.25B

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  11. Re:Thinkpads by Cobalt+Jacket · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a ThinkPad T40p. One day, I dumped a whole glass of water on it. The ThinkPad kept running. I turned it off and removed the battery and disassembled it to dry it out. That's when I realized that the ThinkPad had designed-in channels for liquid to flow. It avoids any of the sensitive parts. I just used some paper towels to dab out the water, and let the keyboard dry. Powered it on and it worked like a champ.

  12. IBM Workers by Ween · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live near the IBM PC Division Headquarters (RTP North Carolina). On the news the General Manager of that division (Fran Somebody) said that since there was very little overlap between the two companies that most of the current employees will remain on. She went on to say that her and her entire management team would remain. Hopefully this bodes well for the quality.. at least in the short term until its decided where money could be saved at. I would suspect that eventually those jobs would be moved overseas where the labor is cheaper. The lady also said that the deal wouldnt be final until 2Q 2005.

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
  13. The IBM game by clem.dickey · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Merges divisions A and B to create "synergy."
    2. Split the AB divison to improve "focus."
    3. Repeat steps 1 through 3.

  14. Not really rocket science by tsangc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I honestly don't think this has anything to do with merging with Apple (a stupid rumour) or for that matter, even leveraging Linux over Windows. It's really just shedding an expensive division, saving money and increasing profitability.

    It's explained within the first page of the article:

    "If it goes through, the deal would allow IBM to continue its shift from selling so-called commodity products toward selling services, software and high-end computers. Although it helped make PCs a global phenomenon, IBM makes little profit from PCs and often loses money, despite the fact that it's an $11 billion business for the company."

    IBM's profits come from consulting and integration services, not from selling desktop machines. The price of Windows, Linux or otherwise, or what strategy they push on the desktop is not a big deal in this case.

    What I think it comes down to is they're holding onto a division that is building commodity boxes and that's a tough game with competition like Dell. With ODM's and OEM's doing more and more of the design work these days, really all IBM needs is to pitch the stuff, which isn't affected by the sale of this division. The consulting and sales groups already push the hardware in major deals.

    If you read the article, the market is slowing:

    "That period will see average annual unit shipments slow to 5.7 percent and revenue growth subside to 2 percent, Gartner predicted."

    Hence, you're not going to see any more profits from an area which already has razor thin margins. Give the business to the Chinese, since they know how to reduce costs. The biggest problem Asian manufacturers have today is not engineering skill or manufacturing capability. It's branding and marketing. Lenovo bought the IBM brand for five years and it's worth every penny.

    It's pretty obvious the American part of the company will be cut, probably because they're expensive:

    "It is going to take quite a long time to consummate, and the only way I see this running properly is that if a lot of blood is shed at IBM PC."

    The desktops are already made and built by a Chinese firm (as noted in the article) while the money in laptops is made by large corporate sales contracts, not individual units.

    In the end, I think it's just getting rid of an unprofitable part of the business, not some super strategic technology move.

  15. Down with Big Brother! by Xenex · · Score: 4, Funny

    IBM stopped making personal computer before Apple. I'm sure there's some kind of ironic victory here somewhere...

  16. Re:Sucks! by 808140 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't believe this crap got modded insightful. It's quite clear that Alomex has no personal experience whatsoever with Lenovo. Lenovo (Legend, Lianxiang) is a very high quality company, that has managed to essentially monopolize much of Asia's laptop and desktop PC market for quite sometime now.

    The reason you don't know much about them if you live outside of the greater China area is not because they're of poor quality, it's because the guy who runs the company has his head screwed on straight. I saw a very interesting interview with him when I was in Hong Kong a few months ago, where he was asked if he was going to take his products global. He said that it was definitely on his mind, but that he wanted to develop a strong lead in China, which he perceives as the 21st century's major market, before moving into Europe and the US.

    Lenovo laptops are of high quality make and are priced very competitively. They're very widely regarded here (Shanghai) and my personal experience with them is that they're put together very well, better than say, Sony laptops.

    The Chairman Mao dig is just about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. All it does is demonstrate that Alomex has never been to China and knows diddly squat about it (and if that's not the case, then he's a troll, plain and simple.) Chairman Mao has essentially no credibility in China (which isn't surprising at all) and while the CCP may continue to give him face in certain respects (it's not considered polite to speak ill of the dead here) any marketing rep worth his snuff knows that it's absolute suicide to try to connect your product with Mao and come out on top. The common people (especially in the demographic that buys computers) were mostly pretty badly burnt by the Cultural revolution and as that wasn't very long ago it remains fresh in people's minds.

    China is, at this point, anything but communist. Anyone that makes this accusation is just showing himself to be a bubbling moron.

    Lenovo, in particular, is not a state owned company (there are very few of these anymore, and the Chinese government is dumping them/privatizing them as quickly as they possibly can), it's profitable, successful, and international.

    With their local connections, they will do well. I own a Thinkpad X40 and I personally am not at all concerned that quality will drop. Thinkpads are expensive machines, and if Lenovo keeps them at their current price, they'll be able to make an absolute crapload of money without dropping the quality at all, based on their current offerings.

    This China trolling from desperate Americans worried about losing their economic and technological dominance in the near future needs to stop. I'm American, and let me tell you, no amount of whining is going to stop the PRC. The sleeping dragon is waking and the world, as Napoleon predicted, is trembling.