Photos and Commentary On AMD's PIC
vincecate writes "I just purchased a brand new
AMD PIC
which has been on Slashdot
and
LinuxDevices.
I have opened it up and put
some pictures and comments on the web.
Some interesting things are that the system uses only 8 watts,
the Windows CE does not want you installing any software,
you can not get to the BIOS settings,
and I was not able to boot Linux." (He was able, though, to boot Linux from an IDE device on a mini-ITX system also based on the Geode processor.)
"Windows CE does not want you installing any software, you can not get to the BIOS settings, and I was not able to boot Linux."
With this kind of proprietary bullshit why even bother? Sure, it'll get hacked, but I'd rather not humour them by buying it.
Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
The boxes are for use by poor people. These boxes are supposed to be a trouble-free way of getting on the net. Microsoft have supplied a cut-down, hardened, very stable operating system for use on it. Yes, it might cost more per copy, but if it runs much longer than the comparable linux solution, it's cheaper, as no-one has to drive hundreds of miles out to the PC to fix it.
They don't want "to give MS a bone" - they want to do what they set out to do - provide cheap reliable PCs to poor people who can't afford otherwise.
Anyway, if a linux option was chosen, who's going to make the special hardened version? Who has the financial clout to guarantee the project goes through? To assure the buyers that the OS isn't flakey? Exactly.