Slashdot Mirror


WAN/LAN/VoIP Training Other than Cisco?

skeezix-the-cat asks: "After 9/11, the economy tanked, and a lot of state budgets shrank drastically, especially IT budgets. I work for a NOC for a western state with a population as sparse as Wyoming, but not nearly as well connected that was particularly hard hit by the recession. Training money at our agency has been scant, almost non-existent since 2001. Security has seen some bucks, and Windows/Microsoft training of course for the LAN team but general WAN training has suffered. Cisco VoIP training would be swell, and it's everywhere (but in our state). I have one shot at top-shelf training, a week, maybe two. What else is out there as far as LAN/WAN/VoIP training that would cover VoIP and related in a non-Cisco format that still would translate into my Cisco environment?" "Even with the lack of training, we do ok -- Cisco TAC is nothing to sneeze at, Qwest carrier services techs are available and (IMHO) second to none, and our WAN team is blessedly a talented bunch of self starters. We route, switch, tunnel and bridge just about any whacked out architecture you can think of (but no MPLS yet.....). Our WAN is insane --multi-vendor frame, ATM, private DSL, private-line, lashed to a Sonet-MGX core (among other aggregation schemes), you name it we do it.

It has come to pass that I have a rare opportunity for some honest-to-god paid-for training, and w/ VoIP barreling down on everyone, this is where i'm looking to throw myself with this chance. We are pretty much a Cisco shop, but some agencies are prevailing on non-Cisco VoIP solutions. I have CBWFQ successfully making VoIP work --VoIP 'trunking' switch-attached phones between multi-cloud-connected sites w/ ATM-- across select backwaters of our network, I grok the basics and can even make it work.

I'm no expert, but I'm to the point, having made it work in one or two locations, that I have some nuanced, technique questions even (queueing, etc). If the Cisco training is all that's realistically available, I'll take it and be grateful, be it Cisco VoIP offerings or (jeepers) CIT would be fantastic...arguably better/more useful than the VoIP stuff, per se.

Is anyone out there prevailing on any great WAN/routing/QoS/troubleshooting training that *isn't* Cisco? Management wants me to tell them what I want, and tell them soon as in within the week --before the money evaporates."

106 comments

  1. werd man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call vonage dawg.

  2. compTIA... by jmrobinson · · Score: 3, Informative

    has some certs other than that you are looking at proprietary certs for a particular product.

    1. Re:compTIA... by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CompTIA's certs are worthless, in my opinion. I've seen the people that come out of them and sat through their Network+ class, and I'd never do it again. It was easily one of the biggest wastes of time I've ever experienced. The trainer actually taught a bunch of stuff flat-out wrong.

      The poster could easily walk in and teach any of their network classes. I'd recommend he look elsewhere.

    2. Re:compTIA... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Is it the certification or the instructor? Sounds like a bad instruction who must of been a paper MSCE.

      I'm currently taking a Network+ class at the local college. The instructor repeats often that classroom time (about 64 hours) is only 1/5 of the total hours that Comptia recommends before taking the exam, and that getting an "A" in the class is not going to get you certifed. He also mentions that both Microsoft and Comptia will change their certification programs in the near future to require proof of actual work experience before awarding the certification.

      I got seven years of software testing experience that includes messing around with networks. I'll be taking the beta exam for Network+ at the end of the month. Even with the class and several study books, I don't think it's going to be an easy exam and is probably harder than the A+ exams that I took last year.

    3. Re:compTIA... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Is it the certification or the instructor? Sounds like a bad instruction who must of been a paper MSCE.

      Are you serious? The MS TCP/IP test was harder than the Network+ test, not to mention the other tests necessary to become an MCSE, even a paper one.

      I'm currently taking a Network+ class at the local college. The instructor repeats often that classroom time (about 64 hours) is only 1/5 of the total hours that Comptia recommends before taking the exam, and that getting an "A" in the class is not going to get you certifed.

      Then he is incompetent. I took the Network+ test with absolutely no study. I didn't need it, I had been working in networking for over a year. Anyone that isn't a complete moron that knows the difference between UDP and TCP can pass the test.

    4. Re:compTIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are comparing Network+ to the MSCE?

      Or any certification for that matter?

      CompTia is there for a reason. You don't have any expierence, but you want to show you can apply somthing .

      I just passed my CISSP Examination, and I'm going through their random audit for the minimum of 48 months of expierence.

      I'm not belittling Network+ for what it's worth, but damn, dude. Don't compare a Go-Cart track to Nascar.

    5. Re:compTIA... by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 1

      I readily admit I never took the Network+ exam. As I said to management after returning from the class, "I'd be embarrassed to have a cert saying I know this stuff. It'd be the networking equivalent of having a cert that says I know how to add single-digit numbers.".

      I don't mean to knock your experience in the class. Depending on your background, you may very well need that cert to get you an interview. For somebody who's already in the field though, it's a waste of time. The MS certification path is harder, from what I've heard. I've taken a bunch of those classes, too (my employer is big on training & education), and found that the MCSE track material is much more difficult than the Network+ stuff. I'm not saying the MS stuff is incredibly difficult (aside from having to accept the MS way as correct for the purposes of the exam), but it's hugely more difficult than the CompTIA stuff.

      I'm not sure CompTIA will add a requirement for previous employment, though. From the snapshot of the Network+ class I took, I was the only one who was working in the business. Everybody else was looking to break in, and had apparently seen advertising saying that this was the way to do it. They were woefully unprepared for anything but the most junior positions, and even then, would require constant oversight.

      To add some completely unsolicited advice, if you find the Network+ exam to be as hard as you're predicting, you're not ready for a job in the field. If you can get one, great, but to really understand what's going on, I'd recommend getting a few spare PC's and setting up your own network. Use Linux From Scratch for one of the machines, FreeBSD for another, and Windows XP for the third. Get the machines up and running DNS, NTP, mail (using postfix or sendmail), SMB/CIFS (samba on the non-windows boxen), HTTP (via Apache), and play with Squid for proxying. Also try out firewalling using both Linux & iptables and FreeBSD & pf.

      None of those things should cost you anything (except maybe a WinXP licence). After making all that stuff work together, you'll start to realise how networks are really layered and how services talk to each other. It's important to realise the dependencies between network services. I've found people who "learned" networking in exclusively Windows networks think of too much as magic and have some pretty serious gaps in their knowledge. This stuff should help you out if, as I surmise from your post, you're looking to learn about and get into the business. Good luck. :)

    6. Re:compTIA... by xrayspx · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with the original poster. I took both A+ and Network + in beta years ago, neither one took more than 20 minutes. I am very glad I didn't take some course or pay full non-beta price for the tests.

      I can't believe the rates some places are charging for courses for these tests. At the time I took them I was working as a tech in a local computer store with some networking out-calls to set up printers and stuff, and those were easily the simplest tests I've ever seen, even then.

    7. Re:compTIA... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm actually taking the class because it's a requirement for a programming track I been taking at the college. Since I got my A+ certification, I'm going to get my Network+ certification, which in turn will satisify the elective requirement for the MCSA certification.

      The textbook I'm using has 800-pages of obscure details to memorize (which may be useful if you're designing a network) and the testing software is not easy in my opinion. (I would say that Microsoft Windows 2000 study book and software was more easier in comparison.) Now it could be that the textbook and software is a lot harder than the actual test. I noticed that when I was taking the A+ tests each one took me 15 minutes to read the legal doc and 15 minutes to finish the test.

      The class I'm taking is compose of mostly people who are trying to break into networking for the first time without having any work experience. A handful are taking the class because it's a requirement for another track. I'm probably the only one who has some work experience and the instructor usually pick on me when it obvious that no one else read the text book. I didn't realize how bad it was until I had to explain to the people at my table what Hyperterminal is and why they need to use that instead of a web browser to access a Cisco router through the serial port.

      At home, I have my Windows XP machine, a Linux File server using Samba, a Windows XP laptop with a wireless adapter, a wired network connected to a wireless router connected to a cable modem, and my roommates computers tied into the network. I'm also using Vmware to look at a dozen OSes that I downloaded off the internet. The only thing I don't have is fiber optics, a T1 and some Cisco equipment.

  3. Off topic 9/11 rant by nufsaid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > After 9/11 the economy tanked

    I just would like to point out that the U.S. economy was heading for a correction about that time. It has proven convenient for people to blame terrorism for problems with the U.S. economy rather than address root causes. Then again, perhaps the poster was not implying cause and effect here?

    --
    Is this the promised end? Or image of that horror? KING LEAR
    1. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would like to point out that the Economy was starting a correction cycle back near the end of 2000.... AKA the good old days before Bush.

      the economy had hit the official definition of recession in the summer before the attacks (those two quarters prior to the attacks made it a recession)

      the terror attacks hurt an already weak economy, drawing out the pain of a recession even longer because we had a flat period in growth from then till about the next summer, after which the economy grew a tiny bit per quarter. it was not until last year that the economy began to really start to sizzle.

      it is to bad though that so many people were put out of work because CEOs needed more money.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took the words from my mouth..

    3. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you live, but in Ohio, we certainly aren't sizzling. The economy is bad.

    4. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by Lanboy · · Score: 1

      I agree. Every company that had ridiculously puffed up earnings and business models based on an unending growth market suddenly announced that because of 9/11 they wouldn't make thier numbers and started balancing the books again.

    5. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Troll

      umm, national economy moron... and I can call you that because your moron state re-elected that buffoon.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      seems to me that the buffoon's ecomomy is getting better. But he was talking about ohio's economy that is not performing as well as some other areas in the nation.

      BTW, who's the moron when they can't figure that out?

    7. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hearts & Minds, kooky partisan, hearts & minds.

      As in, you need to win them over, not call them retards, throwbacks, morons, or whatever else occurs to you.

    8. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know where you live, but in Ohio, we certainly aren't sizzling. The economy is bad.

      Speak for yourself. I live in Cleveland and I'm better off than ever before. The last 4 years have been an absolute dream. My salary has been steadily increasing per year, my credit card debt all got paid off due to the low interest rate balance transfers the CC companies were offering, I've got a house with a low fixed interest rate mortgage, a relatively new car with a low fixed interest rate, etc. In fact, everyone I know around me is doing great. The only part of the economy I've seen tank around here are manufacturing jobs working in blue-collar industries and that has been going downhill for a decade. Huge steel factories can't compete with the mini-mills and foreign competitors that have lower shipping and materials costs. On the plus side I notice there is a large new international steel conglomerate that bought out LTV steel up here and is looking to expand so even the blue collar workers may see the economy picking up soon.

    9. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      Which makes total sense, in a sense : consider the people who bought into their business model before 9-11..it only makes sense that the same people would buy the retreat from the model they accepted, otherwise that would show them how incompetent and delusional they were. Nobody, not even critics like discovering they were foolish.

    10. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by MrHyd3 · · Score: 0

      It was very true the economy was running down hill in '98-'99. It had to of been if all these company's earnings were inflated to make their bottom line running up to 2001. Which is why Clinton economics was not a good thing.

      --
      -------- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. --Ozzy
    11. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      what relevance did Ohio's economy have on what I said in the first place? I was simply replying to his comment. but you must be from Ohio as well because only a moron would have not been able to catch that.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    12. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      With all the "budget-oriented" shortcuts that governments are taking of late, I imagine there will be some big-time messes to clean up once (if?) the economy gets rolling again. That should mean some decent times for techies WRT gov jobs for a while. Hopefully we can postpone worries about offshoring for one more decade.

      But pay-your-own-training is becoming the norm in the private sector. It will likely spill over into the public sector as well. It is becoming an "on your own" economy under the new conservatism.

    13. Re:Off topic 9/11 rant by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actually, ohio's economy is part of the national econemy. One would be forced to assume that it was included in what you said. That being aside form the rest of the point, it has everythign to do with what you said. I can spell it out for you with pictures if aren't capable of seeing it your self. I find it ironicaly funny that in your rush to call others names you have made a bigger example out of yourself.

      And yes i am from ohio as well. What that has to do with someone being a moron escapes me (i preffer to be a dumbass instead). Maybe someone as enlightend as you could explian it a little better this time around. BTW ohio isn't the only state to elect GW back in office, it was just one of the last ones to report thier votes. But i guess someone as smart as you shouldn't be bothered with such petty information.

      If your moron argument is based on Bush being re-elected then i'm sure the rest of the country is a moron too. It is odd the the inhabitants of over 2/3 the land mass in the U.S.A. is of less intelectual prowes then the smart people that ar e seeking counsiling for thier guy not getting elected. maybe it isn't the rest of the country that has the problem?? thats somethign to wonder.

      I tend to think that his opponents just didn't run a good campian. I have yet to hear someone say Kerry stood for anyhting greatly different then bush. They all say he had a plan but can offer no details about it. When you ask someone why Kerry should have been voted for, their typical responce is anything to get bush out or we need another democrate in office. NOthing on Kerry himself. Maybe the real morons are those that tryed to run against Bush?? After all there were always someone on TV trying to tell us what kerry really ment after saying somethign bush used against him. And no! bush isn't the best man for the job. He was the best man we had to pick from for the job. Maybe Kerry would have been better if they had someone like you helping them. You could have told him how to narrowlly focuss his statments and then call every one names when they didnt' stay in between the lines.

  4. YDI by pdabbadabba · · Score: 2, Informative

    YDI (DC based, I think) offers training seminars/conferences. I've sent some employees there and have been reasonably satisfied with the results. Here's their info page: http://www.ydi.com/support/training.php

  5. Just take the Cisco classes........ by ARRRLovin · · Score: 1

    90% of the concepts will port.

    --
    -Randy
  6. The answer is yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They are called books and they can be had usually for $50 or less. There is also something called the Internet, it has a lot of information too.

    1. Re:The answer is yes by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They are called books and they can be had usually for $50 or less.

      Who modded this down? I'm amazed at the number of people who refuse to learn anything unless some authority figure spoon-feeds it to them. People, give yourself a little more credit than that.

      If you can't motivate enough for individual study, then select a book or two, form a small group and meet regularly as you work your way through it. Use the internet to find answers to questions that the books don't address. You won't get anything more than that out of an expensive "training" class, except maybe a worthless certificate.

    2. Re:The answer is yes by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Certification (regardless of its actual worth) always looks good on a resume.

    3. Re:The answer is yes by id09542 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about other companies, but where I work I would be hard pressed to have a week off from work to learn from books and the Internet. Formal training gets you out of the office and away from day-to-day interruptions.

    4. Re:The answer is yes by Pii · · Score: 1
      I don't know about the original poster, but I certainly learn better in a classromm/lab environment than I do by simply reading books.

      There's a lot to be said for being able to ask questions, or get clarification on the nuances of a topic, especially if it's new to you.

      The study group is a good idea, but you need to find a number of other dedicated individuals that are going to take it seriously. That can be hit or miss.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  7. New Kinetics by VirtualUK · · Score: 2, Informative

    New Kinetics http://newkinetics.com/ offer VoIP training, primarily focused on European clients for their VoIP courses, though they do perform in house training in the US too.

  8. cisco vs avaya by SoupGuru · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've been in on a Cisco VoIP intranet system from installation thru implementation and then to the point of realizing it wasn't doing for us what we wanted it to do and what we were promised it would do. I was at a school district and we had some requirements for some pretty strict call routing rules that made us look to an Avaya solution. I was there when we installed that as well.

    What have I learned about VoIP and different companies? Mostly that one company's management tools are a world of difference away from another's.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  9. Seriously, Get some books by wschalle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Buy the Cisco Press books then take the certification test. Then pass the books on to the next person in your department. Easy as pie. Those classes are usually hard to learn anything concrete from anyway.

    1. Re:Seriously, Get some books by maunleon · · Score: 1

      Careful, Cisco certification involves simulations these days. A little hands on helps a lot, either on the device under test or a simulator.

      I don't mean to claim CCNA and related are that hard, but when I took it I had a butt-slow simulator who ate up time while I was waiting for it to catch up with my typing! It really helps not to be fumbling for commands during the test.

    2. Re:Seriously, Get some books by value_added · · Score: 1

      "Those classes are usually hard."

      "To learn anything concrete."

      "From anyway."

      Geesus, man! I agree the Cisco Press books are well written, but your suggestion would have been more valuable if it included the passing of participles along with books.

  10. Avaya by NetJunkie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Avaya has a very strong presence in the VoIP world. They offer training all over so check them out. Will it carry over? It depends. All of the management and software is different between vendors. Sure, some of the underlying stuff is the same, but anything you usually mess with is different.

    1. Re:Avaya by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Good god. I can't believe anybody would recommend this bunch. Lucent-connected or not, I wouldn't let these people near my residential phones, let alone my office phones.

      Take Cisco classes, then look at asterisk to see if it'll do what you need it to.

      Chances are good that it will.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Avaya by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I'd recommend it. :)

      We're using it right now. We got stuck in a lease which kept us from changing. For the most part it works fine, but I don't think we use a lot of the capability.

    3. Re:Avaya by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      I must say the partner system that we have at our family business is a wonderful system. Its simple and offers a good amount of functionality and is easy for me to administer. I wouldent mind a system like that at home.

    4. Re:Avaya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I second this. Everytime I hear the name Lucent or Avaya, I get one of those involuntary body shudders. We have a wonderful Avaya setup, and it requires a machine with a modem setup with PCAnywhere and a admin account for them. And everytime they try and call in, I end up wasting an hour explaining to the tech over the phone how to work PCAnywhere. These are people that came in and installed the system and didn't test anything, and they still want top dollar for their equipment!

      And don't get me started on the Avaya routers, they installed two routers that did PPP over T1 lines to remote offices. Great except for the seriously jacked up RIP support they had that created routing loops in all the Cisco gear.

      Avaya is bad, mmkay!

  11. Self-teach! by Lando+Griffin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get FreeSCO (http://www.freesco.org/) and download FAQs and stuff. Even the "cheap" training places don't offer their product for free, and you can at least nail the concepts down with books and Internet-provided information. I work for a $4 billion pharmaceutical and am allowed exactly one training course per year.

    1. Re:Self-teach! by Geccoman · · Score: 1

      I don't think freesco will help him in the realm of VOIP to the degree that the poster is looking to understand.

      The poster is looking for WAN/routing/QoS/troubleshooting training that goes above and beyond the basics that the freesco FAQs will teach.

      --
      I'm on a chair.
    2. Re:Self-teach! by Lando+Griffin · · Score: 1

      True. I can attest to FreeSCO working fine with Cisco's VOIP CallManager/Selsius product, but it was just in a pinch while my old 3160 routers were being replaced with Infonet's 2600s during our MPLS migration. I was happy it worked at all, but did not delve into QoS or any in-depth troubleshooting.

    3. Re:Self-teach! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Free SCO?

      Is that like Free Tibet, or free drinks? I'm not sure I'd like it either way....

  12. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is there another western state less populated then Wyoming?

    1. Re:Hmm. by geniusj · · Score: 1

      He said sparsely populated. That could just mean a larger state with a slightly larger population (e.g. Montana or Alaska)

    2. Re:Hmm. by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      Well he damn sure doesn't mean Idaho. We're so backwoods here....it's unbelievable. The state is trying to push for a statewide digital radio system but they don't have the first clue about VOIP and aren't really interested in bothering to find out.

      And the system they want to build? Yeah, it's an experiment for Homeland Security. They are actually trying to build several systems that are screwed up and cant talk to each other so they can use bubble gum, duct tape and bailing wire to patch them together to talk.

      I don't know what state this guy is in but he should be VERY happy that he's not in Idaho.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  13. Riddle me this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone in government IT demand weeks of training for tasks that they then perform with less competence than private sector employees who happily "picked it up" from reading and playing around for a few hours?

    1. Re:Riddle me this by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      They seem to need that in the corporate world, too. Once upon a time I was talking to a guy who worked for a big IT consulting firm as a C programmer. He was telling me about how he really really wanted to learn Java, but he just couldn't because his boss wouldn't approve it that particular fiscal year. That was several years ago, and I'm still shaking my head.

  14. a few links here . . by wi11iAmBlAk3 · · Score: 1
  15. Best way to learn... by deep_magic · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...is to do.

    I understand you want to get some formalized training while the getting is good. Don't blame you there.

    But, honestly, the absolute best way to learn something like this is to do it. Download asterisk and start playing. You can even connect a free soft-phone (SIP) to it so there is really no up front cost.

    IMHO, formalized training is only useful *after* you have already learned a good deal about the subject matter. It gives you a chance to organize all you thoughts that have been plaguing you, and have a compentent teacher answer them for you.

    Going in cold to VOIP lab, when you leave you will understand some jargon - but most of the deep concepts will escape you.

  16. Running Windows and Cisco by codepunk · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you are running Windows and Cisco instead of Linux and Asterisk you are not broke!....pay up sucka

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Running Windows and Cisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, if he's running windows and cisco, he probably is broke.... ;)

    2. Re:Running Windows and Cisco by damned_in_davis · · Score: 0

      argh... maybe he's a pirate, matey.

      --


      "why you tattoring fan sucked doo belly - i have to go buy something to strike you with... excuse me."
    3. Re:Running Windows and Cisco by stanmann · · Score: 1

      But I don't have an asterisk.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:Running Windows and Cisco by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Pretty Mary bought some skates
      Upon the ice to frisk
      Wasn't she a silly girl
      Her little * ?

      Mary had an aeroplane
      Around the world she'd whisk.
      Wasn't she a silly girl
      Her little * ?

      Little Mary took her skis
      Upon the snow to frisk.
      Wasn't she a silly girl
      Her little * ?

      There once was a soldier named Fisk
      Who said, when the fighting got brisk,
      "I'm sorry to say
      that I can not stay --
      I've got only one *"

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  17. Read. by stacko · · Score: 3, Informative

    You don't need a training class. If you go through the Cisco web site, you'll see that all of the manuals are right there. While lengthy, those manuals provide very comprehensive discussion around the specific commands/steps to implement the concepts. If you look at the tech notes, you'll find all sorts of information on the theory. Together, you get a comprehensive picture of both the high-level concepts and the low-level commands.

    I just went through a CallManager/CRS installation, and spent most of my time reading the Admin Guides and the System Guides, and spent some quality time with the VoIP-specific IOS guides to setup my gateways. Really, look in the manual, and you'll see: Step 1: bla, Step 2: bla, To Verify Setup: bla. No training, no certification, just a working system. Those manuals are great, and TAC will help you out on the rare occasion you get stuck.

    From your question, it really looks like you've figured out the CallManager stuff, and are now just optimizing your network. The thing to keep in mind about VoIP is that it's oIP. All of the knowledge that you already have about traffic optimization applies directly to the voice traffic.

    Spend your training bucks elsewhere, preferably at a conference that takes you to Tahiti.

    1. Re:Read. by Flower · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Geek Cruises looks promising...

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  18. Vendor specific. by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, there are a few standards in the area of VoIP so, your request shouldn't be out-of-line. But, the fact is that the two biggest players in the VoIP arena are Cisco and Nortel. They both claim to follow the standards but, they also both have enough of their own proprietary stuff in there to make them non-standard. Cisco waffles on about H323 and SIP, Nortel does too but, both prefer their own signaling system.

    Your employer, a government agency, is unlikely to implement any of the lessor vendor's products. Furthermore, you will never see the likes of Asterisk or Skype while employed there. This all means that you should get vendor training from whomever your employer is most likely to implement. On the surface, it sounds like that would be Cisco but, check the telephone on your desk. If it is a Nortel phone, then there is a good chance that your state may implement a Nortel VoIP solution.

    1. Re:Vendor specific. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Furthermore, you will never see the likes of Asterisk or Skype while employed there.

      Good Christ! Please don't mention these two in the same breath. Asterisk is an open-source, standards-conformant project created by a company that sees more profit in expanding the scope and power of VoIP than in locking its customers into a broken "solution". Skype, on the other hand, is a totally proprietary hack-job put out by known spyware criminals (the Kazaa people).

  19. a few links here . . by wi11iAmBlAk3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    sorry, this is what I meant to type in . . http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-VoIP+Training Asterisk is worth looking into - install if you like. It is compatible with sip and cisco's "skinny" protocol and works with cisco phones as well as many others. It also does h.323 (if you like pain), iax2 (used by some big companies such as VoicePulse), adsi, sip, etc. http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Aster isk You can download an iso and install it from the iso or run from a live cd: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+installatio n+tips all above are from http://wwww.voip-info.org/

  20. Keep it simple by Jim+Ethanol · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm.. so your environment is Cisco, but there are no Cisco classes in your area... but on the other hand, Cisco education is much more widely distributed than any other type of networking training... Wait... why don't you just go to Cisco training again?

    Sure, there's Juniper, etc. But the reality is that Cisco still has the most comprehensive, practical, network training on the planet.

    Classes aren't good for much except the Lab. In the lecture they basically read the book to you, so if you can read for yourself, you might save some money by hitting Ebay for your lab equipment and Amazon for your training material.

  21. Suck it up by SiO2 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm lucky, but my boss never skimps on the training budget. In fact, he often has to push my colleagues and me out the door, because we're "too busy" for training. He downright insists on training. I work at a small, private university so maybe this is a rare case.

    Enlighten the guy who holds your purse strings about the ROI for training. Do some surfing and find some numbers and statistics. The folks who control the money understand that.

    Best of luck!

    SiO2

    1. Re:Suck it up by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm lucky, but my boss never skimps on the training budget.

      Yeah, you're lucky - far too many people don't have a smart boss. It's unfortunate that makes you "lucky".

      Enlighten the guy who holds your purse strings about the ROI for training.

      Not to mention the whole point of a VoIP system is to save tons of money - so build some training into the budget.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  22. RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be rude, but I have found that RTFM, Google, 3rd party books, and Cisco Field Manuals (bn.com) and served me better than classes. I have found classes slow and a waste of time.

  23. Well, there is........ by wolf31o2 · · Score: 1

    It really depends on what exactly you are looking to learn. Are you wanting to learn a vendor's product? Are you wanting to learn software solutions? Hardware?

    Some of the big VoIP guys that I am familiar with or have worked with are:

    • Sonus
    • Cisco
    • Avaya
    • Sylantro
    • BroadSoft
    • IPUnity
    • BayPackets

    Some of them are hardware switches with VoIP capabilities. Some are PBX systems with VoIP capabilities. Some are software switches that do VoIP in software completely. Some are VoIP voicemail systems. Some are VoIP software PBX systems.

    So I ask again, what do you want to learn?

  24. I was going to recommend.... by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    I was going to recommend Global Knowledge, but after reading some of the other posts I see there is plenty of education and training available that I never knew existed.
    Personally I'd rather save the cash, read a book, and test things out in my lab. But that's just me.

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  25. Go with marketshare by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    Nortel is largest manufactor of voip solutions but I'm kinda wary since when they went bankrupt(2001) they sacked their voip division(ALA micom). Sonus came out of nowhere and is probably one the best solutions on the market.

    Stats on voip manufactors

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:Go with marketshare by jumpinin · · Score: 1

      Nortel didn't go bankrupt in 2001 and they didn't sack the entire VoIP division. They sacked some departments, sold off some VoIP products but are still in the VoIP market.

      --
      Verbing wierds language --Calvin
  26. Do it in a different way by elh_inny · · Score: 2

    If I were you, I'd talk to the finance guys so that they just give you the money and you bring them the bills. I'd invest in books and a nice computer farm at home (in fact I have it already), one fast computer for home entertainment + sometimes a server, a slower and cheap computer for serve, sometimes client and a laptop and you can emulate any environment on these 3 computers (plus you can run vmvare or similar and have even more computers) for instance install asterisk on the cheap server and have fun at home.
    And after you're done you can either sell the computers or have them for your own entertainment.

  27. Your kidding, right? by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:
    Our WAN is insane --multi-vendor frame, ATM, private DSL, private-line, lashed to a Sonet-MGX core (among other aggregation schemes), you name it we do it.

    It seems to me that he is already trained and experienced in much more advanced WAN scenarios than FreeSCO could ever offer.

    Does FreeSCO support frame-relay, ATM, private DSL, leased line or Sonet? No, I didn't think so. For that matter, does FreeSCO even support a rouing protocol like, RIP2, EIGRP, OSPF, IS-IS or BGP? Even Windows 95 can do the "routing" that FreeSCO does but, that doesn't make Windows 95 a router.

    1. Re:Your kidding, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hrmmm...where to start.

      1). It's "you're." Not "your." Let me give you an example of correct usage:

      "You're an illiterate moron."

      2). The content of the article itself. "I want to become a CCIE, but I don't want to spend any money. Help!" PLEASE.

      3). If a network device is routing packets, it is by definition a router, regardless of the operating system on the device, or the feature set offered by the software. Yes, even a lowly Windows 95 machine that is routing packets is a router.

  28. hey asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quit playing cute with your "guessing games" and just tell us which state you're from.. don't worry.. i won't beat your ass

    peace nigga

    RIP DIMEBAG DARRYL!!

  29. Don't use CBWFQ... by theNetFreak · · Score: 1

    Typically CBWFQ (Class-based Weighted Fair Queueing) is not used for voice as it gives a bandwdith guarantee, but not one for latency. To keep voice quality consistent you want a fixed amount of bandwidth and the lowest latency possible. On cisco gear this is implemented using LLQ (Low Latency Queuing) which works as a straight priority queue. You can use policing to keep it from running away with all the bandwidth.

    1. Re:Don't use CBWFQ... by neoee · · Score: 1

      LLQ (Low Latency Queueing) is also known as PQ-CBFWQ. Only difference is a keyword in the policy map.

  30. December 16th by cwernli · · Score: 1

    Management wants me to tell them what I want, and tell them soon as in within the week.

    Or should that be December 11th?

    Stay on dude, it's scary: Status bar

  31. Resource for those who prefer self-study by Moosifer · · Score: 1
  32. Learn your basics first. by monkeyspank99 · · Score: 1

    I've worked for both Telecom and Data vendors, and every one I ever work with always seem to have problems understanding "the other side". VoIP is such a broad term with so many different signalling protocols, it is hard to really know what the heck someone means when they say VoIP. Learn your basics of the PSTN network, eventually there will be certainly be a call that needs to go out a PSTN. First class I took when VoIP was "new" and was a SS7 course, back then we were signalling with IPDC but one of the greatest classes ever to fully understand what Telephony signalling is all about. You'll have an edge over strictly Data guys because you will know the PSTN, debug it and point to what the interop issue with the Switch is. When call routing fails, you can trace back to why it took the wrong path. Data guys can only look back to the gatekeeper and IP signalling. Don't get me wrong, I started as a data guy and realized telco was my weakness. Having an understanding of a Telco network will give you the better understanding of both sides of the network. Although I do work for a hardware vendor, I'm not vendor centric. A lot of the insterop issues does require me to configure Metaswitches, Sonus, 5ES, DMS, etc.. but having the SS7 training I get a fairly good start without ever being tied to a vendor. If something isn't working, I breakout a test set and look at "Signalling" the magic that makes it all work.

  33. WTF, Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So now that Dachelle is out of office you won't have free handouts from the rest of the US and now you need open source help?

    If you cannot read the docs and self train then you should move to management.

  34. odd, nobody has mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the Cisco training is vapid and pointless, helping only enhance the ranks of the Borg-like masses who march to the Fife of Chambers

    Real Networks use Real Routers

  35. Cisco Networkers Online is a great deal by purlah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't argue with those that tell you to get books and study, as that is a great way to learn.

    However, you should be aware of another supplementary training option. Cisco's annual network technology training conference called Networkers is available online for about $300. You will get a subscription to the service for a year, during which you can stream audio and slides from any of the two-hour training sessions presented at the conference. The material ranges from introductory to very advanced, and includes 44 hours of VOIP specific instruction taught by people who really know what they are doing (and hundreds of hours of other material on unrelated routing and switching technologies)

    Unfortunately, it doesnt like firefox/linux too much, but it works well on windows.
    http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/scp/viewer/ind ex.php?client_id=196&event_id=13208&bypass_reg=tru e

    anyway, highly recommended. and the material can be trusted to be more current than that available in most books.

  36. I have an urgent need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anal sex, whilst screaming on a VoIP phone.

  37. So whch is it? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Montana, the Dakotas, or Idaho?

  38. If you really want to learn ... by shri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best place to get trained is google.com :)

  39. I'll come and teach you ... by puzzled · · Score: 1


    I hold the Cisco Certified Network and Design Profesional ratings and only the MPLS exam stands between me and the Cisco Certified Internetwork Professional ticket, which means I've had the pleasure of the Cisco DQOS exam recently.

    I used to work for an international voice carrier and I've had my hands in various VoIP projects for about the last five years. I have one customer with a six node Cisco VoIP over low speed frame network, another with a five site contraption that does VoIP and video over point to point frame encapsulated T1s, and I'm in preliminary discussions with investors on starting a VoIP centrex of CLEC service in my city.

    I'm within driving distance of you, things are slack at the end of the year, and I used to work for what is the third or fourth largest used Cisco shop in the country - I can stop there, pick up a bunch of Cisco VoIP toys, and head your way.

    You can email me, bliss at ignorant dot org, if this sounds like a possible solution.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  40. VOIP training bereaks down to two areas by pjc-bashq · · Score: 1

    From the point of view of training being transferable I guess VOIP breaks down into two areas: 1) VOIP protocols actually on the wire This is your H323 and Skinny etc. Any stuff you learn about this and queuing/bandwidth requirements etc is totally transferable from on evendor to another. 2) Config and management of VOIP PBX This would be Cisco CallManager or Nortel BCM for example. Here really we are talking about applications and the management and reporting tools that come with them. These are usually completely different from one vendor to the next and there is not really that much that's transferable from the point of view of training. Pat CCIE #2305

  41. asterisk aka * { http:// asterisk.org } by unix_geek_512 · · Score: 1

    You will learn more about VoIP if you grab asterisk from

    http://asterisk.org

    than if you attend 1000 training classes!

    1. Re:asterisk aka * { http:// asterisk.org } by Windowser · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I did about 5 months ago.

      Recently, I've installed 4 Asterisk PBX, and I'm configuring the 5th one, with multiple call queues, conferences rooms, remote agents (at home, with a soft-phone), call parking, voicemail (optionnally delivered to your email), etc.

      Maybe you will not get any certificate from this, but what you will learn is invaluable.

      That's the power of OSS : I can install Linux on a cheap computer (Duron 1ghz, 512meg), install Asterisk, and get myself a working VoIP PBX, and play with it as I wish without any cost (except the "cheap" computer).

      That's the best possible way I can learn.

      --
      Avoid the MS tax, always buy I.B.M. PC's (I Built-it Myself)
  42. Self-Study and Vendor Training by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of posts to this thread saying things like "read a book" or "use Google", and suggesting that all you need to do is download Asterisk and play with it. I would suggest that these people do not install and support VoIP systems in a production environment.

    Reading and self-study are major components to learning a new technology, and I agree that a few good Cisco Press books will help you tremendously in the realm of learning complex concepts such as QoS. There are quite a number of online and deadtree resources for learning about legacy telephony concepts (which translate into VoIP concepts). However, building real world skills with VoIP systems requires a considerable amount of hands-on time. And unless you have a fortune to spend on gear and software for a lab, self-study is just not an option.

    Training classes will provide you access to the same voice gateway and switching hardware you would use when implementing a real world project. And that hands on time will prove invaluable when you are trying to configure a T1 blade in your Cat6509 to work as a voice gateway to interface with a legacy Lucent voicemail system. There is much more to it than simply having the book knowledge of the difference between loop-start and E&M.

    Having said that, your quest for cross-platform training is going to hit some significant obstacles. Core concepts can be learned from written materials, and you will get a solid foundation of telephony knowledge that can translate well across platforms. But the devil is in the implementation. Here's where you have to pick which pony you're going to ride.

    The actual implementation of VoIP technologies varies to such a degree from vendor to vendor, that trying to take a Nortel class to learn skills for use in implementing a Cisco CallManager system would be pretty much futile. Each system has its unique approaches to the various problems of VoIP, as well as its own secret tricks or techniques.

    So my advice would be this: get some books to learn the core technologies and concepts of telephony. But decide which vendor you are going to focus on (or which vendor your company is going to implement) and take one or two training classes for that vendor's system, and get some lab time with their gear under your belt. Another possibility, is to use vendor resources to get free training or lab time. I don't know if Cisco has a regional office in your area, but build a relationship with your account team and parlay that into some free time in one of their "partner labs". I've known Cisco to give out hours of time in the lab, as well as what amounts to free training with the product specialists and SE's, if they think the end result of their effort will be a sale.

  43. Interactive Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd recommend a small company called Interactive Intelligence. They're call routing capacity is unbelievably good, and they have a pretty neat 'call handler' designer.

    Check out http://www.inin.com. They also piggy-back on Cisco (to make up for some of Cisco's many deficiencies in the call handling dept.).

    They really push SIP, mainly because Cisco's old TAPI solution was wwwaaaayyyy rough to interface with (Cisco provided 3rd party guys with a TSP layer -- something to control their system with -- and it crashed *a lot*)

    Not to rock too much on Cisco, it's real easy to make fun of the first guy out of the shute! However, just 'cause they *were* the first guy, doesn't mean you have to stick with 'em either.

  44. If you take the Cisco training... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you decide to go the Cisco route, I recommend taking the Cisco VoIP classes, not CIT (the Cisco troubleshooting course). I have been a certified Cisco instructor for years, and I can tell you that CIT is focused on pure routing and switching, not VoIP. Cisco's Cvoice class gives you a solid background on VoIP concepts (basic telephony, H.323, MGCP, SIP, etc.) and is not terribly product specific, but be aware that 30-40% of it focuses on POTS integration. The other Cisco VoIP classes are more product specific.

  45. So tell us already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHERE DO YOU WORK??

    Most of us would kill for an employer like that. Heck, I bet you even get health care coverage!

  46. Advanced Ethical Hacking at InfoSec Institute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are looking for VOIP hacking and security, I attended the Advanced Ethical Hacking course at InfoSec Institute. It was pretty good.

  47. Professional training.... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, there's no one better than ARG. I've taken about a dozen classes from them. I've used others, but ARG is tops. (They're changing names to Global Knowledge.

    http://www.globalknowledge.com/ Look at their course catalog. They publish "Virtual Classrooms" at significant savings over classroom schools.

    If you live in a remote area, you may need to travel for the classrooms. They're held in hotel ballrooms, 8:30 to 4:30 or 5pm. Many of the classes involve equipment and hands-on. The classes are interesting, the instructors are colorful and have real world experience. I've yet to find a "dud" in their inventory.

    You might also try the University of Phoenix. Online, telecommunications classes. I've not done it, but I know others that have.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  48. Inter-Tel! by shiftoner · · Score: 1

    Inter-Tel is pretty much the only vendor I have worked with that has a reliable VOIP solution. I have never seen a Cisco, Avaya or Panasonic system actually work as advertised in the real world. I have configured installed and supported PBX nad VOIP solutions with all these vendors. Inter-Tel has excellent training facilites and instructors at Inter-Tel university in Pheonix. If you have not looked at an Inter-Tel solution, you probably should. They have everyone beat on technology by a wide margin. Expect to pay more for it however.

  49. Cleveland's job landscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The last 4 years have been an absolute dream.

    Are you smoking crack? Have you seen the Cleveland Plain Dealer's Classified Ads? They stink.

    IT related jobs in Cleveland are in very short supply.

  50. VOIP training. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been happily using Adtran hw for some time, and have been quite pleased. Further, their tech support engineers are that second-to-none you so eagerly enjoy with qwest. These guys held my hand as we journeyed through the uncharted waters of our current VOIP storm.

    It's not a certificate, but it gets you through a bind.