Slashdot Mirror


Splinter Cell Movie in the Works

By way of Voodoo Extreme comes the news that a movie adaptation of Splinter Cell is in the offing. From the blurb: "Paramount has acquired film rights to Tom Clancy's video game Splinter Cell and hired Peter Berg (Friday Night Lights) to direct. Variety says Berg is writing the script along with Splinter Cell game writer J.T. Petty and John J. McLaughlin (Man of the House). Paramount said the movie is aimed at combining the game's blend of stealth action with a "dynamic, original" character."

42 comments

  1. great by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny


    2 hours of someone runnning round an empty warehouse looking for a key

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:great by TheAngryMob · · Score: 1
      2 hours of someone runnning round an empty warehouse looking for a key

      Don't you mean: 2 hours of someone sneaking round an empty warehouse looking for a key?

      --

      Don't just game, Dungeoneer
  2. Just like DOOM... by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 1

    I hope this movie has Hellspawn and a Space Marine..

    1. Re:Just like DOOM... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      No this movie will be splinter cell, only instead of a secret agent it will be a mall rent-a-cop, and he will spend the whole movie trying to catch a wily teenager who is trying to get laid before prom.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:Just like DOOM... by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      ...and thereby learning the true meaning of Christmas.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  3. The goggles, they do nothing! by Poseidon88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    To be filmed entirely in night-vision.

  4. Been done by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    This would end up like Mission Impossible except explosive bubble gum and defying-physics motorcycle is not in the movie.

    1. Re:Been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, so it might actually be worth seeing?

  5. Casting by tb3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd say Michael Ironside was a sure thing for the lead role, but he might be a bit old now (at 54)

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    1. Re:Casting by centauri · · Score: 1

      He definitely needs a cameo. Or maybe he can be the Big, Bad, Evil Guy.

      Nah, too much of a stretch.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    2. Re:Casting by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      He'd be a good 'the guy who trained Sam' sort of char.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Casting by centauri · · Score: 1

      Or Sam's father, who dies in a terrorist attack.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    4. Re:Casting by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      He turned up on Smallville recently as a military general, sadly he's starting to look his age a bit I don't think he'll be offered the lead. As long as they don't cast Ben Affleck we should be OK.

    5. Re:Casting by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I'll continue to hold out hope - I'm a huge Ironside fan - he and Terry O'Quinn get the two "Actor wishlists" on TiVo, and his presence is enough to make me think fondly of Highlander 2.

      The lead character ("Splinter Cell?") is supposed to be an old war horse, he keeps complaining that he's "getting too old for this" and appears to be a contemporary of other characters who are themselves around that age.

      Sure, 54 is old, but makeup could probably take 10 years off.

      He probably won't be doing any of those split jump stunts himself though.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    6. Re:Casting by Acts+of+Attrition · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plus Michael Ironside doesn't even doesn't even sound like Sam Fisher

    7. Re:Casting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As long as they don't cast Ben Affleck we should be OK."

      <sarcasm>Yeah, Leonardo DiCapprio (sp?). That'd be OK.</sarcasm>

  6. Yeah and like Doom by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Funny

    It'll be about a circus clown who decides to infiltrate the "evil corporation" that uses animals for experimental testing purposes.

    But rest assured, it'll maintain the spirit and flavor of the Splinter Cell franchise we know and love!

  7. Original character? Wha? by 2Flower · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...with a "dynamic, original" character.

    Okay. When the games are already highly cinematic and have Tom Clancy behind the scenes and are centered on a single well established character like Sam Fisher... WHY would you monkey with that and invent some new "dynamic, original" character for your lead? ...then again, we've all been wondering what was so freaking hard about demons from hell and marines in DOOM. Maybe Hollywood has severe head trauma and can't see the obvious, already established demographic-pleasing elements that are being given to them on a silver platter.

    1. Re:Original character? Wha? by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      I'm all for keeping the Sam Fisher character, but I don't want to see Michael Ironside playing him! Sam would look out of shape. :p

    2. Re:Original character? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: A "dynamic, original" Splinter Cell character in Hollywood means:

      Angelina Jolie
      Jack Black
      Milla Jovovich
      The Wayans Brothers

      Remember, think "Outside the video game box."

    3. Re:Original character? Wha? by scot4875 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Well, if they want a dynamic, original character, that certainly rules out Sam Fisher, who was neither dynamic nor original.

      Of course, I think I'm about the only person in the world that thought the story to Spliter Cell was boring, incoherent nonsense, so maybe take my opinion with a bit of salt.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    4. Re:Original character? Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we could take your opinion with a bit of salt; or you could just be modded "Flamebait." That's more the /. way.

  8. No Tom Clancy? by ashground · · Score: 1

    Put simply, if there was any real desire to make this a 'real movie' and not a 'lame video game adaptation', Tom Clancy would be on the writing credits. He threw his weight behind the game, why not the movie? Add to that a "dynamic, original" new character, and odds are really good that this is going to be very forgettable.

    1. Re:No Tom Clancy? by filth+grinder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because Tom Clancy didn't write the game. The closet to an actual credit is, "Based on some notes Tom decided to give us". Tom Clancy leads him name to a TON to crap that he doesn't write. "Tom Clancy's Ops Center", "Tom Clancy's Power Plays" and a host of other bad books that just tarnish his brand.

      This game has his name on it because it came out of his game studio (Red Storm entertainment which was bought by UbiSoft). It's just one more product he "branded" without having to do the work.

      Plus he isn't a screen writer. Tom Clancy's books are great fun books, but I've yet to see him produce a screenplay. Writing a novel, and writing a script are two different things. Notice how none of the movie adaptations of Tom's books feature him with a screenplay credit.

      What you should be looking at here is the game writer on the writing team. He's the one who should get credit for the story. He's the one who should have his name plastered on the game.

      Tom also pretty much loathes the video games as well. His comments have been anything but warm on video game subjects. He'll plaster his name on them because they sell.

      Executive Orders was the last good thing he's written.

    2. Re:No Tom Clancy? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1
      Speaking of tarnishing his brand, Sweet Merciful Christ, have you read Teeth of the Tiger yet?

      Worst
      Book
      Evar
      Honestly, it is vastly worse than even the crap that's got the " 's " after clancy's name. And it's only half the book... I really want to go into details but won't spoil the horror for you. We'll just say that major characters died in between books and the fact only gets passing mention in one scene of dialogue.

    3. Re:No Tom Clancy? by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 1

      This game has his name on it because it came out of his game studio (Red Storm entertainment which was bought by UbiSoft).

      I have to correct you on this one, the game was created in the montreal studio of Ubisoft. Ubi decided to tag it as a Clancy product simply because, as you said, it sells.

    4. Re:No Tom Clancy? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      If Tom Clancy wrote a movie, it would be approximately 50 hours long, if he cut out some of the detail.

  9. Let The Beating of the Dead Horse Begin! by kenp2002 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let The Beating of the Dead Horse Begin! Soon tactical games like Splinter Cell and Metal Gear will join the ranks of other great dead horses like:

    Casualties:
    Mortal Kombat
    Street Fighter
    Tekken
    Romance of the Three Kingdoms
    Final Fantasy
    Sonic
    Mario
    Zelda
    Kirby
    G.I. Joe
    Heman
    Jason
    Freddie
    Pinhead
    Transformers
    "The First Person Shooter Game"
    "The Real Time Strategy Game"

    Can some soul out there actually make game that is fun to play rather then fun to watch?

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  10. Oooh! I bet I know what it's about. by alexjohns · · Score: 4, Funny
    This one will take place on mars and feature hell demons.

    I can feel it. Can you?

    1. Re:Oooh! I bet I know what it's about. by alexjohns · · Score: 1

      I guess I was slow and not very original. What else is new?

  11. Not a bad game, but as a movie?? by meanfriend · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I personally liked the gameplay of Splinter Cell, but I think it takes itself too seriously to be a good candidate for movie adaptation. Metal Gear Solid is the seminal 'stealth action' game and it lends it self better to a movie version because it's meant to have over-the-top characters and a little cheesy dialog doesnt look out of place. MGS storylines are pretty outlandish and far-fetched, but they work perfectly well in the context of the game.

    Splinter Cell, OTOH aims for gritty, semi-realism; something you might actually believe happens in the real world and a movie that tries to be faithful to the original game would likely fall dreadfully flat. (Though that's usually true of any video game -> movie attempt)

    IMHO, a MGS movie that's meant to be a little campy (think Hellboy or Spiderman) would be more appealing to me than a Splinter Cell adaptation.

  12. In other words by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    It will suck arse and have nothing in common with the game or the book, except for the title.

    Maybe the game spin-off (of this game spin-off) will be really cool, just like all the other times they've done that.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  13. They should Get the X-Men Script Writers by szyzyg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only for the fact that a certain David Hayter is credited.... AKA the voice of Solid Snake in the Metal Gear games.

  14. Get the Doom scriptwriter by trawg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its laughs a minute when playboy billionaire Sam Fisher, played by Roy Schneider, teams up with a wacky talking dog in a journey of self discovery as they traipse across the Sahara!

    1. Re:Get the Doom scriptwriter by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      In his new movie, Rob Schneider is ... the Paperclip!

  15. George Clooney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...would be the ideal star for this.

    1. Re:George Clooney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck George Clooney, they should dig up Rick James' body and hire some Disney animatronic techs to do a little "Robotic Necromancy."

    2. Re:George Clooney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Clooney will always be the handyman from the Facts of Life to me.

      Otherwise, yes, he's the perfect Sam Fisher....boring, charismatically overrated, and just elderly enough to look like a has-been who never was.

      Fuck you, Clooney. FUCK YOU TO HELL!

    3. Re:George Clooney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exaclty what I was thinking.

      He almost has the voice, and he has Sam's "seasoned, not old" characteristic.

      George Clooney would be absolutely perfect for the role as Sam. If they rewrite the main character to take Sam's place, I will be very pissed.

  16. Newbs by darkgoat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Splinter Cell sucks to much to play, so to watch must be worst. Even in a form of a movie.

  17. In the spirit of the Doom movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the spirit of the Doom movie, it's been announced that the Splinter Cell movie will not feature spies, intelligence agencies, terrorists or weapons of any description. It will instead be about a rapping, jive-talking animated duck and his motley crew of live-action children's TV stars as they attempt to win the superbowl against a rival team of evil estate-agents. As a bone thrown to fans of the games on which this is based, one of the sets will feature some shadows.

  18. JP IV by pvt.+tucker · · Score: 1

    This entire thing'll wind up like Jurassic Park. The books by Crichton (I'm about to go get the one that just came out) were teriffic! Jurassic Park followed the general idea, but was the movie was good. The Lost World took the title and introduction page and went from there. There was absolutely 0 Crichton-factor in JP III, which is why it sucked (and the fact that it was directed by Joe Johnson, I can't stand Hidalgo). For those of you who don't frequent IMDb, they're coming out with JP IV. Guess what? It's gonna suck. Pretty much any movie based on a video game is going to suck. Even in the discussion of a Halo movie (which is a hot topic on Bungie), I think it just can't be good. There's no love interest (unless you count Cortana, then, ughhhh....), no real motive (like in Spiderman his uncle gets killed) except, I'm going to save the world!, and no reasonable director would get behind it.

    --
    "New target aquired." "That's not a target, that's Church!" "Target locked." "No, unlock target nice tank lady....."