Slashdot Mirror


External TV Tuners/PVR Devices Tested

Solomon writes "TV Tuners for the PC have existed for a long time but with the ever increasing popularity of TiVo-like services and the possibility of replicating such features on your Windows PC with little effort and a small investment, tuners have been getting a lot of attention this year. Today there's three-way shootout posted at TechSpot with products from Digistor, Transcend and a very appealing offer from RTV called the VEG that lets you play consoles in your monitor. Although neither of these devices can match TiVo completely, they do give you a very cheap alternative."

136 comments

  1. wow by confusion · · Score: 2, Informative
    With all the spam in here its starting to remind me of my inbox.

    Anyway, I have a 9600 all-in-wonder, and I really really like the cable tv tuner deal. I desperately need to upgrade, but I am having a hard time parting with the built in tuner. I suppose these would be a good alternative.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since many stations are switching to HDTV with a digital signal (at least partially) you would think that NTSC tuners would be of no use anymore.

      My question is, what is the point of having an analog NTSC tuner when most people are in range of a digital signal, especially when going to a computer hard drive or a video card?

    2. Re:wow by spac3manspiff · · Score: 0

      Yeah it looks like a nice alternative. The eye catching part is that it's slim and compact. And that is important just because I hate constantly bending over to the back of my pc to unplug a bunch of cables constantly.

    3. Re:wow by confusion · · Score: 1
      Well, I have comcast for a cable provider (yeah, I know), and I get a whopping 14 HD channels. 6 of them are premium, which I don't subscribe to, 2 are sports, which I don't like, 2 are crappy "in-HD" showcase channels, leaving 4 local channels in HD. CBS, NBC, FOX and some other crap.

      No discovery, no learning channel, no history channel. So 99.9% of what I watch (other than Cops) is still in NTSC).

      Jerry
      http://www.syslog.org/

    4. Re:wow by wizbit · · Score: 2, Funny
      leaving 4 local channels in HD. CBS, NBC, FOX and some other crap.

      I'd have written it, "CBS, NBC, ABC, and some other crap," but, to each his own. :)
    5. Re:wow by confusion · · Score: 1
      Very nice...

      Actually, I think all of the networks are crap. I just don't get ABC in HD, which is the one I would want to be in HD if I had the choice.

      I'm with you on the Fox dig, though. Cops is the only thing they've got going for them.

      Jerry
      http://www.syslog.org/

    6. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not have seen Arrested Development yet. Best comedy on TV right now and its on Fox.

  2. I thought it was unwise - by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...to use USB tv tuners. Arent there problems with moving all that video across the USB interface? I remember talk about making an Xbox run Myth off a usb tuner, and it was quickly denounced as impossible....I heard the same thing about a laptop and a WinTV USB hauppauge tuner....

    So? Is this true?

    -thewldisntenuff

    1. Re:I thought it was unwise - by topham · · Score: 4, Informative

      USB 2.0 has sufficient bandwidth if the device performs onboard encoding. (MPEG2 for instance).

    2. Re:I thought it was unwise - by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 1

      Well, with USB 1.0, yeah, there isn't enough bandwidth. Didin't RTFA, though, did ya? "As a side note, you must have at least one USB 2.0 port available in your machine, or you won't be able to use any of these devices." Its right there, USB 2.0 is needed, and it has plently of bandwidth (comparable to Firewire 400).

      --
      William George
    3. Re:I thought it was unwise - by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 0

      This is /.

      Does anybody RTFA? ;)

      -thewldisntenuff

    4. Re:I thought it was unwise - by Schmucky+The+Cat · · Score: 2, Informative
      A USB full speed (1.1) interface is good enough if the USB device has it's own electronics to compress the signal or if it is just forwarding an already compressed signal.

      A USB high speed (2.0) interface is good enough by itself.

    5. Re:I thought it was unwise - by updog · · Score: 1
      Even USB 1.0 should be sufficient if the device has a real-time MPEG encoder. With MPEG2, encoding at 6 Mbps (about 1/2 the USB 1.0 12 Mbps bandwidth) using IBP encoding will give you decent video.

      6 Mbps using MPEG4 encoding is even better, you have plenty of bandwith for great quality video.

      Of course this is assuming a single tuner device - for multiple tuners, you'll probably need high-speed USB.

    6. Re:I thought it was unwise - by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      I am unaware of any USB tuner supported by Linux.

      Get a Hauppauge PVR-250 or PVR-350.

      The Hauppauge PVR-150 and PVR-500 do not work now under Linux. They may work within several months..

    7. Re:I thought it was unwise - by pben · · Score: 1

      The current version of the Hauppauge PVR-350 isn't supported by the Linux ivtv drivers. Some people have gotten the CVS version to work in a limited way.

      I bought a PVR-350 in October 2004 and haven't been able to use it when I am using Linux.

      The old PVR-350's work great when you are using a 2.4.x kernel but the stable version of the ivtv drivers do not work with the 2.6.x kernel. It has been over six months since the last release of the ivtv drivers and I haven't been able to get the unstable ones to work.

    8. Re:I thought it was unwise - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid bitch, USB 2.0 is 480 Mbps. What is the bandwidth of HDTV? 19.4 Mbps. Is 19.4 smaller or larger than 480? Only is Retardoville is it necessary to compress a 19.4 Mbps stream when a 480 Mbps pipe is available.

      Why was this dumbass post modded informative?

    9. Re:I thought it was unwise - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB1.1 is enough for an MPEG2 compressed video stream, at PAL resolution at least (704 x 576?). I have a DEC 2000-t DVB box (USB 1.1 device) hooked up to a Mini-ITX machine and it works great.

    10. Re:I thought it was unwise - by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      You'd be correct in some retarded fashion, if HDTV weren't already a compressed format.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  3. Be careful by exhilaration · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...of any external tuner that claims to let you play console games. *Every* external tuner I've seen has had too much lag to let you play console games.

    1. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why do you even need a tuner for consoles? Get something with composite or s-video input for a lower price and better quality.

    2. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, you can go better than that. Most recent consoles can do VGA output with the right equipment.

    3. Re:Be careful by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      Some people want to be able to play PS2 games using their laptops as displays.

    4. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesnt help for ps2 but get an xbox and a xbox2vga converter.

      works like a charm, even with pc-beamers (no, not the scotty kind of beaming)

      and you can put in a 400gb hdd and never ever have to swap a game or dvd in and out - beats that laser problem the ps2 has too :)

      you can also boot linux, but then theres not so much to do, better to put slayers evox or something similiar onto it (replaces the xbox menu and its logic)

    5. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So get an external adapter with these inputs...

    6. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hooked up xbox to wintv usb tuner...the picture was horrible.

      Hooked xbox up to HDTV Wonder and looked much better and didnt require as much cpu

  4. Doesn't include the best product by beetle496 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They failed to review the best product available, EyeTV

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
    1. Re:Doesn't include the best product by hexdcml · · Score: 1

      I guess this is a Windows only test? I have an eyeTV USB, and although console play is terrible (the lag is 2-3 seconds) I still love it as a TV device, and also an analog capture device - though the quality isn't great, it will suffice. elgato makes some awesome products :)

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    2. Re:Doesn't include the best product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the cooler things I have done with instant messengers like yahoo it to hook it up to my video in and stream it over the net

      voila, instant console and xbox broadcast ;)

  5. Nice Google Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody else get the Piano Tuner advertisment?

  6. this is a narrow target market by ccbutler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    not a bad little roundup... however as someone who is seriously in the market for a value ended PVR, i would have like to have seen a comparison with a hardware Mpeg2-encoded PVR in the mix.

    The author mensions the word 'quality' quite a few times... some hardware encoded screenies would have been a good way to measure those statements.

  7. Notes from A MythTV User by drewzhrodague · · Score: 5, Informative

    DO your research FIRST, and just buy a PVR-250 or PVR-350. Friend of mine didn't listen to me, and went and bought himself a cheap $29 tuner card for $180 -- and no MPEG.

    I have an old non-mpeg tuner card, and it works great with MythTV. Dedicate a box to the task. Get a nice TV-Out card that you can live with. Get the remote control, or a longer-range wireless keyboard.

    MythTV blows my mind everytime I use it: KnoppMyth

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by JaffaKREE · · Score: 2, Funny

      and went and bought himself a cheap $29 tuner card for $180

      Wow, you really need to sit your friend down and have a talk with him.

    2. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by MrTaz65 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or sell him something :)

    3. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PVR-150 has hardware MPEG and is much cheaper (like $75-90 instead of $130).

      I'm sure there are differences, but I don't know what they are.

    4. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by wizbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Chipset is similar, I believe. The 250s (and the "Media Center Edition" 250s) add additional inputs - I believe the 150 only has S-Video and a tuner - and a remote on the non-MCE model. The 350 adds its own tv-out (though it's a bit of a pain to get working properly) and can do nice things like re-interlace the tv signal so your set gets the extra niceties like closed-captioning, and better picture quality from what I've heard. The 350 is up around $150-170 if memory serves.

      They're not great gamer cards, btw, so you might be better off looking at an nvidia chipset if you want to play games on your homebrew pvr.

    5. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      I have an awesome 486 for sale that your friend might want to buy. It even has a turbo button for playing the more demanding games such as Wolfenstein. I am willing to part ways with it for a mere $2000.

    6. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A few weeks ago, I picked up a Hauppauge PVR-250 which I'm using with MythTV. It all works great, except when it comes time to burn to DVD. It turns out that the variable bitrate mpeg2 streams that the Hauppauge PVR-250/350 cards put out aren't fully compliant (or at least not using the latest linux ivtv drivers). This isn't a problem during playback, but when you want to convert to DVD format using standard tools like transcode/mpeg2desc and mplex, the audio and video drift out of sync.

      It took me quite a bit of googling and trial and error to figure out how to deal with the problem. (short answer: replex; longer answer: get mythtvburn and see how it does it). If I'd known about this going in, I would have spent more time researching other hardware options.

    7. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by JWW · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know, you can modify the bitrate and capture resolution for the 250's, its not a constant setting. You can configure it from inside myth.

      I've used avidemux2 to edit out commercials and have burned that content to DVD just fine.

    8. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative
      The PVR 350 is not worth it to me until Hauppauge gets off its butt and makes the video decompression work under linux.

      I go the $29 route myself. In fact my computer is recording a show at this moment. I don't see the point of paying $150 for a hardware compressor when a CPU powerful enough to do the job costs half of that. Plus I can use any new gee-whiz codec that comes along.

    9. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      The PVR-150 has an IR blaster built-in. No idea if MythTV supports it or not. You'd probably have to deal with the nightmare that is LIRC to get it to work.

      The PVR-150 MCE/OEM is similar to the PVR-150, but without the IR blaster or receiver, and no 3rd-party software. It also includes and FM tuner.

      The PVR-250 has Coax and S-video inputs, and a 1/8" stereo plug for audio input. It also has a IR input for the remote control.

      The PVR-250 MCE (OEM) edition has Coax and S-video inputs, and RCA jacks for audio input. No IR input, as it has no remote control. I don't think you can buy these direct from Hauppauge, they are OEM-only devices.

      The PVR-350 is like the 250, but with an S-Video output, MPEG-2 decoder, and an FM tuner.

      Hauppauge finally put up a page that compares all of their tuners in one spot.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    10. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unfortunately it's not a simple matter of bitrate or resolution. My understanding is that the 250 uses noncompliant PTS information in the mpeg2 stream, and that this can cause sync errors. Not everybody experiences it, and it seems to be more of a problem with encoding from VHS rather than from the tuner. I've found the problem using the tuner as well as s-video from a cable box as the source, and when I use replex on the stream, it complains about masses of PTS errors.

      I haven't tried avidemux2 (I don't have time for editing or transcoding) but I'm guessing whatever it does to the file corrects the glitches.

    11. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 1

      Actually, owning a supposedly crappy sofwtare card (Pinnacle PCTV Stereo) http://www.pinnaclesys.com/ProductPage_n.asp?Produ ct_ID=1480 and a classy PVR-350, I am actually suprised of the results. On a beefy P4 machine , the recordings from the software card look better than those of the Hauppage, which has a lot of 'ghosting' especially on faces. That said, the PVR-350 runs great on a 2400+ sempron, and nothing beats the quality of it's tv-out for replay, especially with GB-PVR http://www.gbpvr.com/

      --
      Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
    12. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

      Or if you're in Europe, buy yourself a DVB card. Most DVB cards are well-supported under Linux & MythTV and no CPU cycles are needed for MPEG-encoding, since DVB is basically an MPEG2 stream.

      See /usr/src/linux/Documentation/dvb/cards.txt for a list of what works.

    13. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by wizbit · · Score: 1
      You'd probably have to deal with the nightmare that is LIRC to get it to work.

      C'mon, lirc's not so bad. I built a Myth box running debian but couldn't find myself a lirc deb, so I downloaded it, compiled from source, and followed the instructions. Detected and configured my WinMCE remote and receiver just fine. They even have a default remote layout available on their site for practically every remote available (or programmable). Very handy.
    14. Re:Notes from A MythTV User by kenzoid · · Score: 1

      timeOday:

      What tuner card are you using? My Xmas present to myself is a MythTV/Freevo box, and I'm looking for suggestions. Starting small seems the way to go for me.

      Thanks!

      Ken

  8. Yay Windows (Sarcasm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who even though I actually use Windows more than Linux only wants Linux on my HTPC (PVR or whatever you call it)?
    On the one hand, I could use MCE or XP and SnapStream, on the other hand, I could get more features cheaper and without the limited lifespan that affects all Windows software. I mean, these things might actually work with MythTV, but how the hell would I know without digging through all the reviews and catalogs that google turns up?

    And still only the PCHDTV card and the WinTV cards really support Linux at all. WTF?!

  9. Re:What about my TV's tuner by JaffaKREE · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    offtopic !?

    To answer your question, is the tv worth repairing ? I bought my girlfriend a decent 31" for about $129. It might be an obvious issue if you crack it open, but if it's more complicated the repair bill/parts might not be worth it.

  10. no interest whatsoever by l3v1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Warning: I'm on my Christmas Trolling Spree (TM) :)

    I mean things like:

    replicating such features on your Windows PC with little effort and a small investment

    doesn't make me shiver or feel anything besides deep sadness for the (again) experienced ingorance wave.

    First, I don't care how newbies are just discovering that their computers can do more than playing nobrainer video games for the price of a used car.

    Second, still don't really care how greenhorns can make a Windows PC record anything. I mean I do to some extent like helping people out, or such, but not to the extent to read about it on /. front

    Then, let's say there are people out there who use their computers for PVR-like purposes for more years than the supposedly informed writer knew such pieces of hardware exists. Sometimes I just wonder how many useless rants could one write on some evident applications of computers these days and there would be a mass of people who would still buy them as new stuff.

    I'm out, hopefully no more /. this year :) More "news" like this on the front page and it will be for good :)

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:no interest whatsoever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautifully said - thank you!

  11. satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wake me up when their are directv or dish network compatabile cards. I refuse to give money to charter.

    1. Re:satellite by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      hauppauge has an fta card that will decode dish (and bev) with the "correct" software.

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    2. Re:satellite by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      FTA isn't very usefull. I think the poster wants something that can work with an access card. If I could buy a card that can do encrypted DTV or DishNet I would be all over it. I have yet to find one, though Adaptec had a prototype years ago. It would have to accept a standard access card and view any channels I'm paying for with the account that card is connected to. That would require support from the sat company, which they are not likely to give us.

    3. Re:satellite by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      oh you mean like the rest of the world has?

      CI slot in FTA receivers.

      NIH would be a factor in why dish and dtv didn't go that way.

      Dish net is fully compatible with FTA gear (except for the requirements you list :-)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  12. Not to imformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although neither of these devices can match TiVo completely, they do give you a very cheap alternative

    These devices with their budled software can't match TiVo but a good card like the PVR-x50s or a cheap card with a stong CPU can far exceed what TiVo can do in a MythTV setup.

    The problem is the $ products tend to avoid things like automatic commercial skip, or worse yet (TiVo) some want to add their own. All this for what? $15 a month

    I don't think so...

  13. TV tuners by basic0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was interested in TV tuners and PVR software and so forth for a while, but then I realized that being able to watch and record TV on my computer still does nothing to improve the actual content that passes for entertainment on TV.

    1. Re:TV tuners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it does statistically.

      Rather than having to watch what's on during the small fraction of time you're willing and able to watch TV (say 5% of the time) you can store the "best of the worst" played any time during the day and watch it at your leisure.

      you'll basically be getting an improvement in content equal to the reciprocal of the fraction of the day you can watch TV (in the case of 5% viewing time, you get an effective 20-fold increase in program quality)

      It's hard to argue that EVERYTHING on TV is without merit, and even in the case of tiny but finite quality, this increase will still hold.

      Note that my formula is a bit over simplified as there aren't really decent shows on all channels 24/7 but the basic idea is sound.

    2. Re:TV tuners by jred · · Score: 1

      The beauty of PVRs is that you get to watch what you want, when you want. There *is* some decent stuff on tv (cable, at least), it's just never on when I happen to get time to watch tv. With my pvr, whenever I sit down to watch tv, I know I'll get to watch something I like.

      Go South Park!!! :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    3. Re:TV tuners by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      was interested in TV tuners and PVR software and so forth for a while, but then I realized that being able to watch and record TV on my computer still does nothing to improve the actual content that passes for entertainment on TV.

      True. But there already is pretty decent content on TV. There are plenty of good movies, documentaries, series, etc. being shown. The problem is that it's at inconvenient or ever-changing times, or at the same time as something else, or painful to watch due to the many commercial breaks. A PVR will help with these things, making it several orders of magnitude easier to pick the good stuff from between the crap.

  14. Looking for one for Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't done research yet, but I know Firewire is practically designed to carry video. I have heard that there are a lot of these designed to hook to Firewire, so I'm a bit dissapointed by all three of the reviewed models.

    I think anyone who has tried one of these http://www.apple.com/imac/ can't help but think of it as the perfect design for a PVR.

    nnooiissee

    1. Re:Looking for one for Mac OS X by spiralscratch · · Score: 1

      Like one of these?

    2. Re:Looking for one for Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, exactly like that. Thank you.

      nnooiissee

  15. DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One aspect of the review mentioned the Indeo codec for one of the devices.

    There was also no mention whatsoever of hardware MPEG2 encoding.

    If it doesn't encode MPEG2 in hardware, it's not worth buying. Period.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER! by mattbee · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily-- the MythTV help page recommends budgeting for 1GHz per processor for doing software encoding, then cheap TV cards are an option. Alternatively us lucky people in Europe can receive MPEG2 streams over the air using DVB tuner cards, no encoding necessary.

      --
      Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
    2. Re:DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Instead of getting a card / box with built-in MPEG encoding, why not budget that extra money on a faster CPU instead?

    3. Re:DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER! by steve_bryan · · Score: 2, Informative

      "... us lucky people in Europe can receive MPEG2 streams over the air using DVB tuner cards, no encoding necessary"

      The lucky people in the USA can get our MPEG2 streams free with an antenna and OTA HD tuner. But awareness of this capability is still quite limited. It seems as though the cable and satellite companies have succeeded in convincing most people that HD is only available by paying a monthly fee.

  16. Windows PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..the possibility of replicating such features on your Windows PC

    Windows PC? You mean Linux or other OSs can't do that task? Well.. MythTV is the killer app and it runs on Linux. While all my Windows apps died waaay too often I'm glad I found a rock solid Linux solution that has impressive list of features.

  17. Do it cheaper/better with Linux? by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its a shame they didn't compare these products against MythTV. I've been using it quite happily for some time on my Linux box equipped with a Hauppage TV card. I suspect it works out cheaper than the options offered in the article and has comparable features to a tivo...

    1. Re:Do it cheaper/better with Linux? by djxploit · · Score: 0

      i am running much the same setup only within australia. works perfectly here

      --
      http://www.thegreynomads.com
  18. What if you don't run Windows? by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

    This being /. it would be reasonable to expect a comparison of their ease-of-use under a (for example) RedHat or Debian box, or even BSD.

    Anyone know?

    --
    Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  19. Cheap? by voidptr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although neither of these devices can match TiVo completely, they do give you a very cheap alternative

    How cheap is it really going to be by the time you've added everything up.

    A dual tuner DirecTV tivo with 80 hours space is $100 and $5 a month covers up to 8 of them on an account.

    I doubt you can get a pc with sufficient horsepower, storage, and a couple of these capture dongles for that.

    --
    This .sig for unofficial government use only. Official use subject to $500 fine.
    1. Re:Cheap? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was my thought - I just got a 40gig unit, $50 after rebate, $60/year for the service, and it works great. Since I have kids I don't have time to play with MythTV anyway but it would be kind of hard to justify all the hardware costs. I don't watch all that much TV & I'm not really concerned about archiving stuff, but it's cool to be able to save a few decent movies on there for the babysitter to watch and fill the rest with kids shows.

    2. Re:Cheap? by spicydragonz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With Myth TV on a pc you can then edit/burn/email shows/clips to people. Also since the system is next to your stereo you might as well just play your mp3 collection. Plus since most people have "extra" Pcs around you can use one old PC as a Myth box for cost savings.

    3. Re:Cheap? by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're comparing oranges and apricots here.

      They are comparing a STB box tivo for analog cable with one of these... besides, what self respecting geek doesn't have a spare hand me down PC laying around... to throw a tuner/capture card in?

      FWIW the best benefit to building a PC based PVR isn't cost/subscription savings... it's CONTROL over the content. No one is going to be expiring six feet under DVR recordings without my consent on my PC DVR.

      *shrug*

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    4. Re:Cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can that $100 Tivo box rip my DVDs and store them on the Tivo device for later viewing (DVD jukebox)? Can it rip my audio CDs and act as a music Jukebox? Can it recognize and skip commercials on recorded TV shows? Can it play my DivX files? Can it act as a server and broadcast audio/video to different devices on my network?

      What, it can't? Linux based MythTV can. You see, there's a tiny little difference there :)

    5. Re:Cheap? by jkerman · · Score: 1

      Directv does not charge *any* tivo fee if you have the higher end packages

  20. DVB ? by johnjones · · Score: 1

    frankley MPEG is broadcast to me so I dont need to do anything but shunt it down the wires but linux and windows for that matter are really BAD at this becuase of the tuner drivers conexant should be ashamed

    sort out the DVB drivers and you make more sales right now anyone who buys anything to do with DVB that is not a Set Top Box gets burned
    (the linux drivers are new and in 2.6.10-rc3-bk16 and sothe old truth is once again new = buggy alot of great work is done but more to do )

    regards

    john jones

  21. Re:What about my TV's tuner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most vcrs have perfectly good tuners...if your tv has a composite in just plug a vcr into that and use the vcr to tune channels

  22. Re:What about my TV's tuner by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    If you can repair it yourself then it *might* be worth doing.

    However it's unlikely that the problem will jump out at you, and modern tv's use fairly compact circuitry that'll not be easy to work with.

  23. Have you actually used tivo by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    The biggest thing about tivo is that IT JUST WORKS.

    I've played around with snapstream and mythtv and they work ok, but getting reliable guide data can be a pain in the ass.

    I know i spent more than 1 hour a month trying to keep snapstream running - hence tivo is cheap too.

    1. Re:Have you actually used tivo by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Only if you're working on your snapstream when you'd otherwise be getting paid. Your free time doesn't give you any actual cash. Sure, your time does have a value, it its value is not in dollars and cents terms.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    2. Re:Have you actually used tivo by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Well i choose to only work 40 hours most weeks. I can fill up my spare time with consulting work, or i can dabble around in stock photography, or i can spent time with my wife and family.

      The other way to look as this is that tivo + lifetime subscription costs about the same as a decent HTPC box...

  24. Re:What about my TV's tuner by Cariboo · · Score: 1

    It more than likely is a problem with cold solder connections on the main circuit board. It can be a very tedious job, but you'll end up saving yourself about $60.00 if you do it yourself. Just remember to unplug the TV.

  25. yuck by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

    could they pick some of the crappiest cheeziest bunch of external tuners to test?

    What about hauppauge wintv usb 2 or plextor convertX PVR (which has both PC and Mac pvr software)

    For internal devices I like the wintv pvr250. Yes the pvr150 is cheaper and comes with a better remote/ir blaster, but the pvr250 is better supported in linux with the ivtv drivers being pretty mature/stable for that card.

    *shrug*

    rampy

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:yuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PVR-150 does not work to a useable extent under Linux. Yes, a device that works, the PVR-250, the "better supported" than one that does not work, the PVR-150. The PVR-150 is close to working, but I strongly advise against buying one for use with MythTV unless you are a developer who plans to write the code to make it work. Otherwise, get a PVR-250 or wait for the PVR-150 to be supported.

  26. Use Firewire then. by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know what's available on the PC for this. It is known that USB really isn't up to the requirements for streaming video. On the Mac side there the new El Gato EyeTV 500. The choice in Firewire is mostly because it is required for HD video streaming, not to alleviate some USB silliness.

    1. Re:Use Firewire then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is known that USB really isn't up to the requirements for streaming video.

      Typical Mac user! Everything they say is 5 years out of date...

    2. Re:Use Firewire then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, dumbass. Your statement is correct for USB 1.1, which is old as fuck. USB 2.0 is faster than Firewire 400. Would you care to offer an idiotic explanation of how 400 Mbps is fast enough while 480 Mbps is too slow?

    3. Re:Use Firewire then. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The fact that 480 Mbps is a BURST transfer rate, not a sustained rate?

      Not that Firewire makes 400Mbps in sustained rate either, but it's sustained rate is higher than that of USB2. Why do you think digital video production uses Firewire instead of USB2?

      To paraphrase the reply before you: typical PC user, only looking at the numbers marketing shows you.

  27. My silly TiVo/Mac setup by macslut · · Score: 1

    I've tried various hardware/software solutions on Mac and PCs, but as expected nothing was really a TiVo.

    I don't know why it took me so long to do this, but I eventually just bought a cheap used TiVo with a lifetime membership (about $200) and hooked it up to my Mac. The benefits are that it's not using any of my 4 internal drives or FireWire/USB ports. It has all the advantages of TiVo...suggested recordings, remote programing, home media, etc... but I view it on one of my monitors either full screen or in a small window.

    I can easily transfer shows off and burn to DVD, and since one of my monitors has a secondary ntsc input port, I can always continue to watch even if for some reason I need to restart my Mac. Also no problems if a show is on that needs to be recorded at the same time I might be doing some heavy processing.

    I say this almost every day, but Apple should buy TiVo. They could put a FireWire port on the TiVo box and/or create an OS X version of the software...this plus a million other areas of synergy.

  28. OS X support? by bhima · · Score: 1
    I'm looking for an external solution (firewire) with OS X support that will allow me to hookup to the satellite hookup that is provided in my flat in Austria.

    Has anyone done this?

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:OS X support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elgato makes firewire DVB tuners for terrestrial and satellite digital TV. Here is a link to their product breakdown: http://elgato.com/index.php?file=products_eyetvmai n#

    2. Re:OS X support? by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Take a look at www.elgato.com for more information. They make a whole range of products exclusively for Mac OS X. I have their first product, a USB external box for NTSC video and most recently they introduced a firewire connected HDTV tuner that works with the most recent Macs (you probably need a G5 to get really satisfactory performance). It isn't as though their software has no flaws but it is quite good and they continue to support all their products with software updates.

      Elgato does not have a digital satellite solution for the US market but they might have something like that for some european markets. Check their web site for details as they definitely do have products specifically for european markets.

      I wish that Apple would do something bold in the TV/PC market like acquiring Elgato in order to promote their solidly designed products with Apple branding. I bet there would be a large percentage of current Mac buyers who would be thrilled to get HDTV capability for a new G5 iMac but it just isn't being marketed effectively. It would add a significant dimension to the digital hub strategy.

      It would be similar to their earlier move of acquiring the German company Astarte and getting all that DVD authoring expertise. I get the feeling that Steve Jobs' aversion to TV content might be an impediment to this possibility.

    3. Re:OS X support? by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is the best chance. If any company makes such a product, El Gato is the one.

    4. Re:OS X support? by bhima · · Score: 1

      Amazing! They even have a distributor in my home town! Thanks!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  29. PVR without the monthly fee? by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1

    Is there any digital PVR type of machine that I can get without paying the $15/month fee? I'm wanting something to replace my VCR, but without the tapes. I don't want or need it to automatically record "suggested" shows for me. And I don't care about most other frilly Tivo features. I don't have cable TV, and I don't need it to play my MP3s or be connected to the 'net. Just plain-old record channel 4 at 8PM for one hour, etc. I want to pay $250, plug it in, and use it. Is there anything out there like that?

    1. Re:PVR without the monthly fee? by dsmark · · Score: 1

      Get a Tivo Basic unit, you don't need pay monthly.

    2. Re:PVR without the monthly fee? by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1
      Hmm. So what features are available if you don't subscribe? Here's a choice quote I found on their website...
      A TiVo® box is intended for use only with a paid subscription to the TiVo® service. Without the TiVo service, a TiVo box has extremely limited functionality. No functionality is represented or should be expected.
      And wouldn't I be a sucker if I paid for their "lifetime" subscription plan, since tivo isn't HDTV ready, and analog transmissions are scheduled to end in 2006?
      Television stations serving all markets in the United States are airing digital television programming, although they still must provide analog programming until the target date set by Congress for the completion of the transition to DTV - December 31, 2006. That date may be extended, however, until most homes (85%) in an area are able to watch the DTV programming. At that point, broadcasting on the current (analog) channels will end and that spectrum will be put to other uses.
  30. PVR-150 does not work with MythTV. by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PVR-150 does not work with the ivtv driver or Myth. It is close to working. According to the mailing list, the audio does not work yet. One developer reported a solution. He has not rolled his code back into the main driver yet.

    I hope the PVR-500 becomes supported by ivtv. It has two tuners on a single card, a great gain for people building compact MythTV systems.

    Be very careful when purchasing hardware for MythTV. It is a fantastic package, but only with the right hardware.

  31. Linux USB2 MPEG-2/4 tuner/encoder? by jeif1k · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have recommendations for an external Linux-compatible TV tuner with MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 encoding and a High Speed USB2 interface?

    1. Re:Linux USB2 MPEG-2/4 tuner/encoder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend that you build one and write a driver for it. Linux support for external tuners is unicorn shit. First, it's imaginary. Second, it would stink if it existed at all.

    2. Re:Linux USB2 MPEG-2/4 tuner/encoder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tuner hardware isn't the problem. The problem is that they are hooked up to Windows and Macintosh computers, both of which are technically lousy platforms for dealing with video.

      So, we don't need new hardware, we just need drivers for the existing hardware for an operating system that sucks less than Windows or Macintosh.

    3. Re:Linux USB2 MPEG-2/4 tuner/encoder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, we don't need new hardware, we just need drivers..."

      If you want drivers, you need new hardware. The shitty hardware you got now does not have Linux drivers. The company will not make Linux drivers. The company will not tell you the necessary information to write Linux drivers. Are you getting the picture? If you want it to work, you might as well start from scratch because unicorn shit.

    4. Re:Linux USB2 MPEG-2/4 tuner/encoder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shitty hardware you got now does not have Linux drivers. The company will not make Linux drivers. The company will not tell you the necessary information to write Linux drivers.

      Huh? What hardware do I have? Which company are you talking about?

      You are a moron.

    5. Re:Linux USB2 MPEG-2/4 tuner/encoder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not matter which hardware you have or what company makes it because there is not a single USB external television tuner with Linux support.

      Only a true idiot asks for details about something that does not exist. Go think about how many angels can dance on your pinhead.

  32. portable PVR and laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't this really suited for use in hotel rooms for all those "in-house" movies? How soon before the company outbound sales guys all will want these?

  33. USB HDTV by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

    I bought one of these recently. So far, I like it. It does a good job with analog cable too (unencrypted digital cable channels work too but over-the-air is looks better). The worst I can say about it is that there aren't any Linux drivers, AFAIK at least. I save HDTV shows to my Linux server. HDTVtoMPEG2 and related tools work on the saved streams.

    Standard def is so last century ;-).

    1. Re:USB HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No USB tuner works with Linux. Nada. Zilch. None. The closest was a half ass driver for the original Hauppauge USB PVR orphaned year ago.

    2. Re:USB HDTV by mmcclell · · Score: 1
      You're partially correct... there are no drivers for USB tuners in the official kernels yet, but there *are* some out-of-tree drivers that are kept reasonably up-to-date:
      • This page lists at least one that should work (Lifeview LifeTV). It's been discontinued but can probably still be found here and there. Note that it's only USB 1.1 and 320x480 (not a typo) max resolution, but does support 30 fps at 320x240 with compression.
      • The usbvision driver supports a fairly large list of tuners and capture boxes. All of them are USB 1.1, but the driver does appear to support the proprietary compression.
      No high-speed (A.K.A. "USB 2.0") tuners or capture boxes are supported yet, but this situation will change dramatically once the Crescentec DC1100 driver is finished.
  34. Just bought me a TiVo by DavidD_CA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just picked up a $199 (after rebate) TiVo from Best Buy.. the 80 gig model. Add to the $199 the cost of lifetime subscription to TiVo's programming service ($299).

    So yeah $500 is a lot for a glorified VCR... but I have to say that the damn thing is so easy to use it was worth it.

    I set the thing up to my wireless network in minutes. Now I can stream MP3s onto it from my server. Photos too.

    Sure you can piece your own together using MPEG decoder cards and free (or not) software, but you're gonna spend more time tinkering than you would watching TV. And if you include the price of your computer, you're gonna spend a lot more than the $500 that I did.

    Not to mention the thing will never lock up, get a virus, or need to be reinstalled.

    --
    -David
    1. Re:Just bought me a TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivos are the shiznit, no doubt.

      Even so, I have a mickeysoft media center box and like that too.

      Adding a new codec is trivial, so it plays anything downloaded from the net.

  35. Saving direct stream of DVB-T, possibile or not? by Ecio · · Score: 0

    Does anybody know if it's possible to save the dvb-t mpeg stream directly on the disk with some dtt pci card?

    I read somethere that this is possible for (some?) dvb-s cards.... does it work on dvb-t cards too?

    I would prefer saving it rather than re-encoding to mpeg2 while capturing...

    Any suggestion for european dvb-t cards that have this feature will be appreciated ;)

  36. HAH i'm safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My name is Phil Robinson, and I use the Indeo codec like I breathe air! Take that!

  37. My PVR-350 works fine. by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    I bought my PVR-350 in October, I think. It works fine. I had to take a few poorly documented steps.

    Get a newer ivtv driver. As you know, the stable drivers are way out of date. The official ivtv site is worthless for new hardware. I use one of the 0.2.0-rc drivers.

    Get a newer kernel for its tuner.c because the newer PVR-350 cards have a new tuner, the LG TAPE iirc. I did not want to recompile the whole kernel. I grabbed tuner.c from 2.6.9, stuck it in my kernel source tree and compiled the modules.

    I suggest joining the ivtv-devel mailing list because these drivers are very new and you may benefit from advice if you decide to make your card work under Linux.

  38. DVB or nothing by Nik13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I must say I used to do that analog capturing stuff, but even with the top cards, the quality is very sub-par compared to DVB capturing. You loose a lot doing non-prefect mpeg decoding, then passed thru cheap DACs, filters, wiring (and interferences), more filters, ADC (crappy sampling), on-the-fly (not very efficient) encoding... You just loose too much quality, even with much higher file sizes. DVB just works, 100% quality - no loss at all, small file sizes, cpu loads around 1%... It's just all around better. The only thing is, of course you need to have some DVB streams available (I use DVB-S), it won't do a thing for crappy analog cable or the like (I don't know anyone who still uses that).

    If not, I'd get a satellite set-top box/PVR dealie. For 300$ cdn, you get one with a 80gb HD in it. It works *out of the box*. No OS install, no patching/upgrading/rebooting, no drivers needed, no setting up the remote control manually for your apps, no codecs required, no PVR software to install, no BSODs, none of that - plug it and it works. And just like DVB capturing, it's lossless (they both record the mpeg from the transportstream).

    I've given up on analog capturing about 4 years ago, and I'm NEVER going back to that. I'd do OTA as well if there broadcasts in my area.

    --
    ///<sig />
  39. Re:What about my TV's tuner by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

    On the remote chance someone might do this, DON'T. You will get shocked. Picture tubes build up a considerable charge. If you aren't careful (or pull that wire from the side of the tube) you are likely to find that out the hard way.

  40. bad article choice.. by hdd · · Score: 1

    it's a review for none tech people, not something i would expect to read on slashdot...

    there is no clear indication of if they use software or hardware encoding. and no indication of whether they work under mythtv or MS media cneter 2005 edition.

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  41. Mod the parent comment down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poster is wrong. USB 2.0 has bandwidth to spare even with an uncompressed HDTV signal, so does Firewire. A regular television signal does not require compression to go over a USB 2.0 or Firewire connection.

    A television signal would need to be compressed for 11 Mbps USB 1.1.

    1. Re:Mod the parent comment down by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      So, what's the bandwidth required by an "uncompressed" HDTV signal? Here's a hint: It's more than capable of saturating a gigabit connection if it's a full (1080i) resolution video.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  42. Getting TV into the PC is easy by Tobias+Luetke · · Score: 1

    Getting TV into the PC is easy. Getting it out is the problem.

    It seems the best way is still to get a cheap gf4 with tv out and live with the hideous interferences.

    Do you really have to have a TV with VGA in for thousands of dollars ?

  43. Hauppauge WinTV USB2.0 works great... by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    I use a Hauppage WinTV PVR USB2 mpeg encoder/tuner. It works great on my 4 year old laptop (600MHz) with a PCMCIA USB2.0 card.

    I run it with SageTV, as all the other options I tried (BeyondTV, GB-PVR, etc couldn't handle the older hardware.)

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  44. VDR + DVB-S by realkiwi · · Score: 1

    I have a cheap DVB-S card (skystar2), a hush Epia M10000 with onboard mpeg2 decoding and use http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/VDR. There is a plugin to get EPG data. You can control it with a web based interface. A simple command line or a plugin writes recordings to DVD etc. etc.

    Useful if you live in Europe

    --
    realkiwi
  45. Blah,blah,blah, I am an elitist, blah, blah.. Blah by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    There is enough quality TV anywhere to make it worth it having a device that makes it easy to record it.

    Movies, music, documentaries, news (or wahtever rocks your boat).

    Elitist people are terribly annoying, when they describe their niche likes one discovers that normally they are as despicably unintersting and boring as the tastes they deride so easily.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  46. Useful sites by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    http://ivtv.sourceforge.net/ Join the ivtv-devel mailing list if you want to follow the project and learn about its current status. The project page itself is too far out of date to be very helpful.

    http://ivtv.no-ip.com/ The ivtv driver is under heavy development. This site by a developer named Chris Kennedy has newer releases of the driver. 0.2.0-rc works well for me.

  47. Re:What about my TV's tuner by Dibblah · · Score: 1

    Get shocked makes it sound like one of those funfair buzzer things. IF YOU'RE NOT CAREFUL, YOU WILL DIE.