Next G5 Multitasks Operating Systems
squiggleslash writes "IBM has big plans for the 970, Apple's so-called "G5". The CPU will support partitioning, similar to IBM's mainframe systems, allowing multiple operating systems to run at the same time on a single CPU. A Mac built around this chip could theoretically run OS X, GNU/Linux, Mac OS 9, and the PowerPC version of Windows NT, all simultaneously and independently."
so now I can crash at least five systems at the same time?
OS X is already the best OS available anyway.
What is this, 1994?
I see it runs this "GNU/Linux", but the question is... does it run Linux?
But will it come in a stylish case with a 4-figure price tag?
I'm going to need more than one mouse button!
-ch
...the CPU PartitionMagic is released.
NT for PowerPC. Be still, my heart!
I hate the state the obvious, but, why not get two computers?
"so now I can crash at least five systems at the same time?"
Just wait till partitioning comes to the automotive industry.
native mode is when a resident national of the country in which the machine is located types "java LocalMain" at the console to launch the program and is not to be confused with indigenous mode which is when a resident national of the country in which the machine is located launches it from an IDE GUI. Hope this clarifies things.
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
Do you need to test a multi-machine app? Don't feel like buying more hardware yet? Guess what technology solves that problem ...
VM-Ware?
Really, how is this different? When the OS rides directly "on the metal", you're supposed to get the best performance. Abstract the hardware layer and yes, you can do tricks like this but you pay for it in ticks. Maybe individually affordable hardware now has the ticks to spare. That, and while I love VM-Ware, it's still subject to the goings-on of the underlying OS...
Crap, wasn't the 386 supposed to do this? If only Intel had written the hardware abstraction layer instead of trusting OS vendors to do "what's right"...
yes but I run a beowolf ckuster in the chip