Slashdot Mirror


Quake and Tsunami Devastate South Asia

pfb writes "From reuters, 'The world's fifth-largest quake in a century has hit southern Asia, triggering a speeding tsunami that crashed into Sri Lanka and India, drowning hundreds, and swamping tourist islands in Thailand and the Maldives.'"

36 of 744 comments (clear)

  1. Difficult to detect / prevent by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tsunamis are notoriously difficult to detect, as they remain underwater until approaching the shore; also, the wavelength is in the order of kilometers, so it's very hard to track. However, I'm surprised earthquake detectors could were not used to evacuate people along the coast. A devastating loss of life is the result of such incompetence/inability.

    1. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by enosys · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, they're difficult to detect over deep water. However, the earthquake was obvious enough and one should assume that there may be a tsunami after a quake like that. There should have been some kind of warning.

      Maybe some of the countries didn't have any sort of tsunami warning system. The west coast of USA and Canada has the NOAA West Coast & Alaska Tsunami Warning Center.

    2. Re:Difficult to detect / prevent by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Incompetency? How the hell are you going to evacuate these low-lying places in time? Do you think they have enough plans sitting fueled and ready to go on the runway in the Maldives? Do you think thousands of people on the coast of Bangladesh can move in land quickly enough?

      I think you need to educate yourself some more before passing such harsh judgement.

  2. What about Indonesia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The quake was centered in Summara, an island in Indonesia. I bet that they got the brunt of this thing, so their loss should warrant mention too, I think.

    What's more, I hope that we in the first world waste no time getting aid over there. A lot of those countries lack the resources to deal with a tragedy on this scale.

  3. Re:This is Geek news? by s3pHiRoTh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess the news here are supposed to be stuff that matters. This matters.

  4. Is there even enough time to react? by Moskie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What kind of time delay are we talking about between when the earthquake strikes and when the tsunami forms/hits the coast? I always imagined it was something very short, somewhere near a few minutes.

    What could be done in that short amount of time, exactly?

    1. Re:Is there even enough time to react? by Rob+Carr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What kind of time delay are we talking about between when the earthquake strikes and when the tsunami forms/hits the coast? In deep water, a tsunami goes about 500 mph. Not much time for folks in Sumatra, but the people of Sri Lanka might have been warned.

      As near as I can figure out, all the tsunami warning efforts are focused on the Pacific rim. There simply aren't enough tsunamis elsewhere to make it worth the effort. Or at least so the theory went.

      Why someone with a seismograph didn't look at the 8.9, look at a map, see the Indian ocean and go "Ya know, maybe we should warn someone" is beyond me. I guess 2 hours isn't that long when you don't have set procedures in place. Still....

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  5. From the shores of Chennai India by ashwinds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I live quiet close to the shore in Besant Nagar- we got off easy - but it was awesome (not as in exciting but leave your mouth open gaping awesome) to see the sea swell up and eat up the shoreline. I was just driving past and saw a boat go up and down about 20-30 feet from the road!! I parked the car, grabbed the camera - but by then the sea had receded - but that was enough to cause serious damage to the hutments close to the sea. We had mild tremor to start the day - barely noticeable at around 6.30 AM - i looked up the internet and found Tibet post of USGS registering a 8.9 quake at Sumatra -looking at the map I thought to myself - all thats in the line between Sumatra and Chennai is the sea (and of course teeny weeny Andaman). Went out for Breakfast and on my return - this. Its unforgettable and cannot be described. Most of India's coast is devastated - I hear Sri Lanka, Maldives etc are pretty bad too. The Quake here was nothing - a mild shake at best - but the Tsunami that followed was something else Apologies for the verbose post - but I am struggling for words to tell what happened.

  6. Re:GOD PUNISHING ISLAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Except 80% of Indians are Hindu... and 70% of Sri Lankans are buddhists.

  7. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I hope he is all right


    Me too, I hope he is all right, along with the several hundred millions of other people who live in that region.

  8. Newsfeed from Bangkok by angkor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My site has been following this story since I first felt the temor in Bangkok this morning: http://2bangkok.com/quakes.shtml#quake

  9. Re:This is Geek news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3000 people died in 9/11 and people were outraged. 6000+ people die in Asia and nobody cares?

  10. Re:How long until we blame America by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know it is an unpopular view and I will be immediately marked down for saying so, but I believe this is an act of a higher power.

    Yeah. Mother Nature.


    Punishment for non believers and 9/11 I think?

    Please. If you really believe that God's responsible, then you believe in a sick God: He punishes people (including innocent children) via tsunamis just because he doesn't have enough fans? I seriously doubt other Christians would share your view.

  11. Re:How long until we blame America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude, you are fucking nuts. Make a favor to mankind and just shut up, its because people like you that we are heading again to the Dark Ages. People like you spread hate and fear between humans disguised in the form of religion, people like you make war and kill in the name of some kind of god that you never saw or feeled. you represent the worst of mankind

  12. Low Early, Tasteless Later by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I saw this in the news last night and the death estimates where ludicrously low. This always seems to be the case for these types of events, while death estimates in Western countries always seem to start on the high side and trend down. I'm not sure why this should be. I understand that some less powerful countries (or more centrally controlled) always want to put the best spin on things, but during disasters it always ends up sounding like a Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition routine. Since this type of news is certain to get out, why delay it? Perhaps it is not purposely delayed in this case, but one certainly sees this happening often in other parts of the world. Granted downed communication networks make getting precise news hard (impossible), but perhaps I have already answered my own question. Maybe it's not so much about owning up to a terrible human tragedy, but an unwillingness of admitting not having the technology and infrastructure to make better estimates.

    I've heard no word in the news about Arthur C. Clark. While thousands are dead, he likely has a sturdy structure to live in, and it would be unlikely statistically he perished. Has as been posted though, he lives on the coast so really stating any odds would be hard. I hope he is alive, but only to the extent I wish anyone life and happiness. He has lived a full life, and should he be gone our concern should be with the living. Ironically should he have perished, it would probably inspire more aid for those left alive.

    Hopefully the now approximately 6000 estimate wont climb much higher, but if the past is any guide expect this to grow at least past 20,000.

    BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen? I can understand this in the case of Attacks and Bombings, since Americans could be the targets. But with thousands dead, the news agencies are scrambling to find out if one or two Americans snuffed it.

    1. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Rob+Carr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen?

      For some reason, the human mind categorizes things according to how the object is related to the individual. If something is near, it's far more impactful than if something is far away. If you can see it, it has more impact than if you can't. If you are somehow related to the individual, the event makes a greater impression.

      News organizations know this. By focusing on some aspect that relates to their viewers, they're more likely to draw in the viewer's interest.

      Look at the readers of Slashdot. They immediately related to Arthur C. Clarke living in the area. It's how our brains work.

      As far as numbers, on a cognitive level, we all know that 7000 is larger than 3000 is larger than 10. But our brains don't really grasp numbers over 7 too well. We might have a general feel for 100, and there's some indication that the largest natural human groups wind up around 160 or so. Beyond that, we don't connect to the numbers on a primative level. It's just big numbers.

      As a human, it helps if you understand how your brain works, so that you can compensate.

      Me? I like to snorkel. Reading about the scuba divers that probably got wiped out caught my attention. Through those scuba divers, my brain can now emotionally link to the tragedy. Stupid, but it works.

      You think MS Windows is buggy? Look at the home-grown software your brain's running.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    2. Re:Low Early, Tasteless Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      BTW is it just me, or does it seem in poor taste for News outlets like FOX and CNN to focus on possible American casualties when these kind of natural disasters happen? I can understand this in the case of Attacks and Bombings, since Americans could be the targets. But with thousands dead, the news agencies are scrambling to find out if one or two Americans snuffed it.

      They are American news channels, they focus on the angle that has the most impact to their viewership. Why does Slashdot focus on Arthur C. Clarke, an author who hasn't written anything on his own in over 30 years? Same reason really, a personal connection of a sort.

  13. Re:Tech that would help? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Two things:-

    a) Disaster management techniques: We in India need better processes in managing relief work after disaster has struck; compared to first-world standards, we're woefully under-equipped in terms of emergency medicine and an infrastructure that can rescue people within, say, two hours of something striking. Perhaps a volunteer force or something; we really can't be falling back on the Army each time shit happens.

    b) (My personal favourite) A redundant communication network: More ham radios/VSAT terminals/whatever throughout the nation. Cheap and requires more of a community participation than governmental intervention (which (a) would need).

  14. Re:Mod parent down! by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you from the US? Probably more people have just died than died in 9/11 ... did you see *anyone* say anything as crass and insensitive then? Whether it affects you directly or not it affects a lot of slashdot readers.

    You, matey, are an arsehole.

  15. I can't believe the prejudice here by postbigbang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an astounding loss of life, and a healthy fraction of the posts are just evil. If this is what slashdot has come to, prejudice, intolerance and ill-will for those that have suffered, I'm outta here. These are your brethren. Mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, uncles and aunts that have been hit by an unannounced, unpreventable, and unknowable tragedy. I'm appalled.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:I can't believe the prejudice here by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty insightful post for an AC. You are correct - I don't think it justifies flagrant insensitivity and meanness, but experiencing the full grief of the death and misery that afflicts the human race would of course destroy a person's psyche.

      So we do our best - when a newsworthy event happens that is associated with mass death and destruction we should pause, give a moment of respect and sadness for the people affected and try to move on with our lives because we don't have much other choice. Yes, humans have evolved to be tribalist, to care first and foremost about those we are in some way connected to, those we live near, work with, talk to, and interact with and their loved ones. Let's not try to overly rationalize emotional experiences, they don't always fit into a neat logical framework.

      But we could at least show a modicum of respect (and the vast majority of posts in this story do, it's just a few trolls and dickheads who are being actively nasty).

  16. Running total?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Am I the only one who finds these death countings insensitive and dastardly? It sounds like you folks are keeping score in some video game, 7000, 8500, 11500! Yeah High score! ... Let's just say thousands have died and millions affected and get to the task of fixing things up again.

    And no, I don't buy that "every life counts" BS. Of course every life counts, whether it's the first one affected by this or the last. But IMO, this running total has quite the opposite effect, it dehumanizes the event into a mere sensationalized news item.

  17. Re:Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    +5 interesting? Give me a break. The moon exerts the same gravity pull on earth whether it's full or not. It's like nobody on this site knows about science.

  18. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not like the punishment was meted out by man. They chose to live there, they die. Welcome to real life.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  19. Earthquakes and Undersea Cables by Vryl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Various bits of the net are hard to get at right now (from Oz, that is ...).

    Wondering if the quake has caused any probs ... anyone heard any reports?

  20. Re:How long until we blame America by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uh, you do also realize that there were a large number of Christian tourists at these beaches, correct? I was reading articles about people snorkelling/sunbathing being swept away. If God's after the "non-believers", he shouldn't wave his hand and wipe away hundreds/thousands of his own disciples.

  21. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by skahshah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did they really have the choice?

  22. Oh boy... by cyranoVR · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Finally a human tragedy I'm allowed to get upset about.

    Before you click "Troll," please hear me out:

    On each anniversary of September 11th, I've consistently encountered people who asserted that our grief was selfish and unjustified because "worse disasters had happened elsewhere" - that is, had a higher bodycount.

    Here's just one example:
    Where were you on Jan 26, 2001? Do you remember any news that happened that day at all?

    On that date, an earthquake hit India, leaving 13,000 people dead.

    thirteen thousand. More than four times the amount killed in the World Trade Center. Think about that for a minute. How much coverage of it did you see on CNN? Maybe a day?
    This seems to be the prevailing attitude among many: the scale of a human tragedy is directly proportional to it's bodycount. It's an attitude I've encountered multiple times in Real Life as well as on /.

    Well, I'd like to write now what I wrote then, over two years ago...someting to keep in mind while you're reading this coverage:

    The very notion that the relative significance of human tragedies can be "ranked" by their respective bodycounts is itself sickening.
    1. Re:Oh boy... by krenskeoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, what you have here is ethical considerations, effecting what is litterally a ranking exercise. Human minds ( without personal emotional impacts ) tend to rank things. How do you rank tragedy, easy, death count. In some western nations the death tolls are normally so low we fall back on monetary costs.

      So why did 9/11 have more impact than an earthquake in India? that is simple. 1000 times greater airplay caused it to have a major human emotional impact to a lot of people. Now why did that happen, again simple, no one even had to move much to film and broadcast the disaster. The attacks on 9/11 were delivered to one of the most electronically and media dense places on the planet. While an earthquake in India may well have not even been appearing in papers on the far side of the nation after a week.

      I have similar thoughts regarding ranking Genocide etc. When people attempt to rank genocides I simply state that each was an attempt to destroy a culture. The size of the culture is irrelevant, the thing that makes it bad is that the attempt was made at all.

    2. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      tragedy = bodycount/distance

    3. Re:Oh boy... by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know who you talk to, and I don't think that catastrophes should be ranked so that we can grieve only about the "worst" ones.

      However, consider that some of those you've spoken to might have been comparing the amount of grief shown for the 9/11 attack in contrast to the perceived apathy for other (worse or otherwise) catastrophes. It's not that you're not allowed to grieve for 9/11, but that (in their perception) you've ignored all others. There's some truth to that, if you measure concern by media coverage or charitable donations.

      If victimhood and sense of loss cannot bring out our common humanity, what would?

  23. Death Toll up to 11k by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is truly a sad day for all of humanity. 11,000 people is a huge incredible loss of life. We can talk about the science behind tsunamis all day long, but let's all take a moment to pray for the victims of this catastrophe. Keep in mind that it's not just 11,000 dead, but it's millions homeless, without clean water or food, or a place to live.

    If you can, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE give some money to one of the many relief organizations that is working to help feed and shelter people in the affected zones. I am sure the International Red Cross would be a good place to start.

  24. Re:Creepy... by X86Daddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was snorkeling at Phi Phi just a few weeks ago. And I stayed at the Holiday Inn resort on Patong beach... just a couple blocks from the Zen sushi restaurant in this AP photo. I agree that it is a very odd "I was just there" sensation. Especially since my thoughts while there centered on how it is such a nice and relaxing place to live. My thoughts turn to the boat captains, the receptionists, the nice guard at the hotel, the watresses at the Todai down the street, the metal sculpter I bought a beautiful Alien figure from... Many people I recently interacted with, and no telling if they're still alive. Even if they're okay, they surely have friends and family who aren't.

    These types of events are always very tragic, and with a closer perspective, all too real.

  25. Re:Arthur C. Clarke? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "One death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic."

  26. Re:GOD PUNISHING ISLAM? by thisgooroo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    too bad you weren't right in the path of the tsunami. it would have considerably improved the IQ of both the world and your country. you might want to check out the predominant religions in the hardest hit countries

  27. Re:This is Geek news? by krenskeoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a reply to both siblings. You are probably right, this is not specifically geek news. Maybe we should alter the story tital to "Tidal waves seek out and kills hundreds of computer users and destroy thousands of computers. Oh and 20000 poor people died." No that would be too cynical.

    My main point though is wether or not the incident is natural or man made the story matters. The geek side comes in all over. This will probably see major tech spending on new facilities and warning systems. New research into quake prediction (if the Indian scientist was correctly predicting to within a short distance and less than a half hour then someone is about to throw money at him). There was likely a number of readers of slashdot killed by this ( with a million+ readers, someone was almst certainly in the area ). Geeks also dig, big natural disasters like volcanoes earthquakes etc, so that makes it geeky as well. Good grief the ultimate geek bit is the fact a worker from the special effects team of the LOTR's was in the area and unheard from so far.

    Now as to the apple and oranges excuse as to why 911 was news for geeks (with numerous articles spread over weeks) and this isn't. I personally think it is pretty close to nationalist relativism or possibly even racism. Complaining about one story on a big disaster (which is at least 8 times worse in lives lost and 500 times worse in people directly effected and probably 5 times worse in monetary damage) while trying to justify the stories about a smaller disaster ( with just as little geekiness) appears simply wrong, and suggests ulterior motives.