Slashdot Mirror


New Speed Record For Hybrid Cars

prostoalex writes "According to CarPages, Toyota Prius set a new world record for hybrid vehicles. It 'set the mark at 130.794 mph on the three-mile short course using a standard Hybrid Synergy Drive power-train - a mixture of 1.5 litre petrol engine and an electric motor.'"

31 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. The FASTEST...erm... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 5, Informative

    actually, it's the only hybrid ever entered. In fact, they had to convince the people to open a new category in order to allow the vehicle, because it has more than one 'engine'. IIRC, it may also have been because the other 'engine' (elec. motor) doesn't 'use conventional fuel'.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:The FASTEST...erm... by skywire · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The so-called 'hybrids' use nothing but 'conventional fuel', albeit in an unconventional manner. For marketing purposes, the manufacturers lead the public to believe that they derive part of their energy from combustion of petrol and part "from electricity", which is meaningless but impressive to the average consumer, who doesn't stop to ask why, if that is so, he is not having to charge up his car every night.

      Our local newspaper recently published a glowing 'news story' (a regurgitation of marketing hype) written by a dreamy-eyed reporter who clearly believed that somehow there was a second energy source besides petrol involved. He even claimed that as long as a 'hybrid' was driven below a certain speed, it consumed no petrol (Lest I be flamed, let me make it clear that I am well aware that a 'hybrid' can switch its internal combustion engine on and off as needed while drawing current from the storage cells. The reporter's claim went far beyond that. If he were to be believed, we could all drive around for free the rest of our lives as long as we kept our speed under a certain threshold.)

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    2. Re:The FASTEST...erm... by Andy_R · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, almost all land speed record breakers in recent years have been dual engine hybrids. The LSR rules require the car to be able to go in reverse, and the common solution to this requirement is to stick a tiny electric motor in somewhere that can strain itself half to death while dragging the car a few inches backwards to fit the rules.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    3. Re:The FASTEST...erm... by oozer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      amen, somebody please mod the above post up.

      I read an article on here some time ago where somebody declared that a future depicted full of hydrogen powered vehicles was a "cruel hoax" and that hybrid cars were the best hope for the short to medium term. I can't comment of whether we'll ever be able to manufacture hydrogen in large enough quantites viably, but if you examine the facts, hybrid cars are the cruelest hoax that presents the car buyer today. Hybrid performance is awful in current models - that may improve with better battery technology (the electric motor is the easy part). However the gas mileage these things get is a joke. The Prius gets about 45mpg in realistic useage (based on the independent reviews I've read). That's worse than most european diesel cars get - diesel cars that have decent performance and aren't made of plastic in an attempt to compensate for the weight of lugging two complete power sources about all the time. Oh yes, and they're a helluva lot cheaper to make for the same reason.

      That's not to say I'm a big fan of diesels before anyone starts laying into them and me for all the problems they have. My point is that the hybrid cars claim of being an enviromentally friendly choice is a joke when it gets worse mileage than cars Peugot were making 10 years ago. Still, if it lets the rich people who can afford them feel better that's OK, as long as everyone else realises they are just a PR effort on the part of car manufacturers to make it appear like they give a damn.

    4. Re:The FASTEST...erm... by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Prius gets about 45mpg in realistic useage (based on the independent reviews I've read). That's worse than most european diesel cars get - diesel cars that have decent performance and aren't made of plastic in an attempt to compensate for the weight of lugging two complete power sources about all the time. Oh yes, and they're a helluva lot cheaper to make for the same reason.

      I have a Prius, and you're right, I do get about 45 mpg. Keep in mind, though, that diesel is currently a little bit better than hybrid technology in terms of efficiency, but it lags far behind in terms of emissions...the hybrid is far, far better for the environment.

      Also, I fail to see how hybrid and diesel are mutually exclusive. Many of the technological breakthroughs that Toyota and Honda have pioneered in making their hybrid engines could be used with diesel engines, too, right? Regenerative braking, continuously variable transmission, fast-starting and stopping of the engine - there's no reason these can't be eventually used in virtually every automobile.

    5. Re:The FASTEST...erm... by jeif1k · · Score: 3, Informative

      For marketing purposes, the manufacturers lead the public to believe that they derive part of their energy from combustion of petrol and part "from electricity", which is meaningless but impressive to the average consumer, who doesn't stop to ask why, if that is so, he is not having to charge up his car every night.

      Fortunately, most consumers know that the "from electricity" part is far from meaningless. Quite to the contrary: it enables regenerative braking, low-end torque, and instant startup/shutdown.

      Our local newspaper recently published a glowing 'news story' [...]

      Well, so the quality of your local newspaper reporting matches the quality of its readers--readers like you. But just because both you and a reporter got it wrong doesn't mean the rest of the world doesn't understand it.

    6. Re:The FASTEST...erm... by ph43drus · · Score: 5, Informative

      The parent is right that the cars only get their energy from gasoline. However, there is a deeper efficiency story here that just isn't as quick and easy a sound bite as "getting your car's energy from two sources---gas and electricity"---which is an awful marketroid half-truth.

      Anyway, to clarify on hybrids:

      The efficiency story goes like this: your normally car engine sucks as far as efficiency is concerned. This is because they have to operate over a wide range of speed and power requirements. Eg. from just taking off from a dead stop to running up a hill at 70mph or more. A spark engine can get to be about 30% efficient (this is from memory, it might even be up to 40%, I'd have to go look it up, and I'm feeling lazy ;). But anyway, the point is, that because of the requirements put on the spark engine in a car, it has to be designed for maximum power output, and this means for most driving the highest efficiency a car engine can attain is 20% (this would be for a tiny Japanese car which is engineered for fuel efficiency, like a Toyota Tercel or Honda Civic, other cars, like most SUVs, perform worse).

      The trick with the hybrids like the Prius is that they have the battery+electric motor to supplement the gas engine. So, the designers can do something important: they can pick a median power output (much below maximum required power output), and design the spark engine to be maximally efficient for that power output. This allows them to get the 30-40% efficiency out of the gas engine mentioned above. The hybrid only ever runs the gas engine at this power output. If this is too much, the electric motor run the wheels. If this is too little, the motor and the engine drive the wheels. If the batteries are getting low, the gas engine drives the electric motor to charge the batteries. When braking, part of the axel motion is used to drive the electric motor and charge the batteries (reclaiming some of the energy already expended to be reused---this is the regenerative braking that others have mentioned). Note: the designers at Toyota and Honda have taken advantage of the fact that an electric motor and generator are merely the same device, which one it functions as depends on which end the energy comes in, so there is no separate generator. (And if it occurs to you that the clutching system would be complicated because of this, you're right.)

      As far as being able to charge up your hybrid, there are some experimental models with that feature. You might eventually be able to do that; so if you just drive around town, you'd only rarely have to fill your tank (however, this feature requires that the bank of batteries is bigger, and 50% of the electricity in the US comes from coal, so the pollution/energy expenditure could end up being worse off the wall charge, depending on where your power comes from ;).

      Jeff

  2. Not exactly standard... by avalys · · Score: 4, Informative

    This car was not exactly "standard", as the summary claims.

    "An engineering group from Toyota Motorsport in the USA prepared the car by changing the gear ratios (4.32:1 to 3.2:1) and increasing the inverter voltage from 500 to 550 volts. A transmission cooling system was added to decrease the temperature of the inverter and electric motor to maximise efficiency. Ambient temperature on the salt flats was nearly 100 degrees Fahrenheit with nearly 100 degrees humidity. Ice was added between runs to keep the system cool.

    The interior of the car was stripped to save weight, a roll cage added for safety and the whole car lowered by five inches to improve the aerodynamics for this highly specialised record attempt. Even the 26 in front and 25 in rear tyres were made especially by Goodyear."


    With that in mind, hybrids have a long way to go.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Not exactly standard... by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  3. They did cheat a little by stripping it. by zymano · · Score: 3, Insightful


    An engineering group from Toyota Motorsport in the USA prepared the car by changing the gear ratios (4.32:1 to 3.2:1) and increasing the inverter voltage from 500 to 550 volts. A transmission cooling system was added to decrease the temperature of the inverter and electric motor to maximise efficiency. Ambient temperature on the salt flats was nearly 100 degrees Fahrenheit with nearly 100 degrees humidity. Ice was added between runs to keep the system cool.

    The interior of the car was stripped to save weight, a roll cage added for safety and the whole car lowered by five inches to improve the aerodynamics for this highly specialised record attempt. Even the 26 in front and 25 in rear tyres were made especially by Goodyear.


    1. Re:They did cheat a little by stripping it. by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, but a steam powered vehicle did hit 127.66 mph in 1906.

      Besides, Model-T's weren't speed machines, they were consumer machines that opened up the market to sectors who had never before been able to afford a car. A model-T modified for racing could reach 100 mph

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  4. Re:OOOOH WOW by notthe9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This can help crush myths (and not-so-myths) about Hybrids being slow and laggy.

    Though they are not built for speed, most people would like to know that their car can easily go 80. Further, Hybrid racing is an interesting idea. Virtually all types of races are about getting good speed under certain limiting conditions... what an interesting limit to be up against.

  5. 130.794 mph by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

    What, did it go off a cliff?

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  6. Wait by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They didn't mention the statistic the matters much more (to most of us) than top speed, which is acceleration. Very few people ever drive above 85-90, and most driving is done below 60, so being able to go 130 doesn't matter that much.

    Where hybrid and pure electric cars really need to improve is the all important ability to get up to speed quickly and smoothly, and it doesn't appear that this car really addressed this critical issue.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Wait by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is such a troll. A car is about energy management and energy tradeoffs. A hybrid is designed to use minimal fuel, with the compromise of acceleration, which is around 0-60 mph in 11.5 seconds. Something like an Accord has much lower gas milage, and about the same size, so it can accelerate to 60 mph in around 7.5 seconds. An Escape, which is bigger but still respects fuel economy, accelerates to 60 mph in around 9.0 seconds. A Miata which is designed to be quick and small, needs 6.5 seconds. OTOH, a Hummer, which does not respect size, fuel economy, or other people lives, needs 21 seconds to accelerate to 60 mph, although they have recently gotten down to below 15 seconds.

      And yet we do not hear people complaining about Hummers wasting all our time at stop lights. This is because people buy Hummers to show they can. Just like people who buy hybrids do so not to go fast, but to conserve the US stratigic supply of fuel for those Americans who are dying and might need it Iraq rather than thier selfish need to look flash.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  7. We need a Formula One series for Electric/Hybrid by NZheretic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just as early twentieth century motor racing pushed the development of the automobile, the world desperately needs a world wide racing series for hybrid electric cars.

    The fantastic acceleration that in line wheel electric drive can potentialy deliver would make for some very exciting racing.

  8. Hybrid technology needed a little redneckization.. by CodeWanker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's face it, cool car ideas come from people who love cars the way most /.ers love processor overclocking, water-cooling, and case mods. Convincing a wider audience that tweaking a hybrid will make it jump up and dance is never a bad idea.

    Of course, as a side note, the industry's approach to hybrid autos is flat out wrong. Railroad trains are very efficient, well-proven hybrid designs: their diesel engines are always running at the most efficient level, and their momentum is provided entirely by electric motors. Tres spiffy.

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
  9. 2005 Honda Accord Hybrid... by cpenner461 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...will probably not have a problem meeting or beating this record when it hits the streets. Its got a 255hp V6 that gets 37/29 mpg (highway/city). 2005 Honda Accord Hybrid info

  10. I can picture it now.... by Duncan3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The car at the starting point, gas engine reved up and getting louder, charging up the electric system...

    A slight yellow glow enveloping the car...

    Rocks and dirt flying up in a whirlwind around it...

    Driver screaming SUPER HYBRID SPEED WAVE!!! and darting off in a cloud of dust...

    Um... this car was Japanese right?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  11. Re:OOOOH WOW by Infinityis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, that myth will likely be futher crushed with the release of a retrofittable hybrid electric vehicle kit, such as the one being developed by Ecolectric Technology (www.ecolectrictechnology.com). Then, you can take any vehicle, retrofit it to be hybrid electric, race it, and claim a new world record. The inherent increase in low-end torque (and thus acceleration) will probably make it as desirable a modification as turbochargers or superchargers on any performance vehicle.

    A hybrid McLaren might be pretty nice if you as me...

  12. Re:OOOOH WOW by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You seem to be forgetting a very basic marketting effect: look at rally racing cars in europe these days: most cars entered are mom-and-pop 4-door sedans, or bargain basement 2-door econoboxes that are strategically souped up and modified for racing by the manufacturers themselves (if not simply a racing chassis with a fake body of the model in question).

    That way, mom and pop's teenage son fresh out of getting the driver's license, and young adults, associate the shite econobox with the powerful race cars they see on TV and they buy it.

    So guess what? hybrid manufacturers are doing the same. The least thing they want is for their vehicles to be associated with being a mature person's choice for economy and savings. So they race hybrids, even if it makes no sense, to make them sexy to young male drivers. Plain and simple.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  13. Let me be the first to say it.... by conteXXt · · Score: 4, Funny

    130.794 mph should be more than enough for everybody.

    (ooops....did I say that?)

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  14. National Electric Drag Racing Association by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Informative

    You should check these guys out...

    The drag race pure electric cars/motorcycles...

    http://www.nedra.com/

  15. Re:Was the electric motor even used? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 3, Informative

    For Honda's hybrid systems, yes.

    For Toyota's, no.

    1. The powertrain is more efficient, and lighter, than a normal cars. (No complex transmission, just a simple Planetary gear.)

    2. I know when I'm going down the freeway, I'm not going a perfectly constant 55 mph, nor am I travelling on a perfectly level road. (Only if your power load NEVER changes does the battery system not matter.) Quite often, I'm running on battery power alone, in fact, even at 60+ mph. (My record is going down a very slight incline, I accelerated from 61 to 63 mph on battery power alone. In my gas-only car, 'coasting' in neutral on the exact same stretch, the car settles at 56 mph.)

    3. The entire 'hybrid' system adds less than 100 pounds of weight to the car, and from what I've read, the simpler transmission and engine (no alternator, no starter) actually saves about 100 pounds, so it ends up even.

    I agree that setting a speed record in a hybrid is silly. But the hybrid components don't cause HARM, either.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  16. Re:What on earth does that mean? by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's either a typo , actually referring to 100% humdity (crikey!) or they mean the wet bulb temperature was nearly 100 degrees.

    For those who say "WTF is wet bulb temp?" it goes like this:

    You have two thermometers.
    One has (typically) a sock/tube of cloth over it's sensing bulb that has the bottom of the tube in a bit of water, so that it's wet. It's the "wet bulb"

    You also have a dry bulb. (i.e. a normal thermometer hanging out in the air)

    Now, at 100% humidity, the wet bulb will be at the same temperature as the dry bulb, as the water on the wet bulb does not evaporate (as the air is already saturated). As the humidity decreases towards zero percent, the wet bulb will have a progressively lower temperature compared to the dry bulb, due to the cooling effect of the evaporating water. Look the two (wet and dry) temperatures up in a handy chart that someone has already calculated, and ta-da! Humidity in percent.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  17. Re:Many years ago ... by killbill! · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you still think diesels stink, think again. In my country, even BMW sales are over 80% diesel.

    A nice example of modern Diesel engineering is the VW Phaeton V10 Tdi. It has 313 HP and, while officially electronically limited to 250 kph (155 mph), was tested at over 290 kph (180 mph) when it was released one year ago. It does 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) in 6.9 seconds (not too shabby for a 3 metric ton car). And yet, it still gets 27.7 mpg.

    To put it in a nutshell, I don't quite get what this hybrid frenzy is about. Soot emissions used to be a problem, but the latest cars get a soot filter that tackles it. On the other hand, batteries are an additional weight, and once at the end of their lives, are an environmental nightmare.
    Or could it be all about oil companies being too lazy to invest into cleaner gas-oil (like they sell in Europe)?

    If you're an American looking for a new car, I strongly suggest you gave the few imported diesel VWs, Audis or Mercedeses a try before you go the gasoline route.

  18. This won't last long... by smithmc · · Score: 3, Interesting


    ...I'm sure this record will easily be crushed by the new Honda Accord hybrid. 240 hp 3.0L engine, plus electric motor, does 0-60 in under 7 seconds IIRC. With the speed limiter removed (and no other mods like ice cooling, ferchrissake), I'll bet it does 150 mph easy.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  19. Re:Hybrids are stupid by jd142 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hybrids aren't all about pure fuel economy. They're also about pollution. If you do a lot of city driving, you will pollute less. In your roommate's example, the 38 mpg city compares to between 55 and 60 mpg city. So for the driving that most people do(city driving) the Prius gets about 1.5 times the mpg and pollutes less as well. The EPA rates the Prius at 60 mpg. The 55 was from a blog.

    The rest of your comments sound an awful lot like fud.

  20. According to Honda... by scott9676 · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Insight can go 115 mph. And this is stock without being stripped, having a roll cage, or any other modifications.

    It has a 995 cc 3 cylinder gas engine putting out about 63 hp. In series it has a 13 hp electric engine. Because the 2 engines have different hp/rpm curves, it puts out 68 hp. But it only weighs 1850 pounds.

    The car goes 0-60 in 10.5 seconds, has really good handling, and drives kind of like a go kart. The only real bad thing is there isn't much sound insulation, so there is a fair amount of road noise.

    But even going 90 mph, it can still click off about 50 mpg. At 45 mph, you can get it into 'lean burn' mode and get a bit over 100 mpg.

    It's a really good commuter car, has a lifetime mileage of 56 mpg (would be a lot higher if I drove a bit more conservatively and didn't live in a hilly area).

    Also, there are some electric cars that go 0-60 in 3.6 seconds IIRC.

  21. Re:Hate to spoil your fun, but... by ambrosen · · Score: 3, Informative
    Fair point. I drive about 1000 miles per year, fly about 2500 miles per year (with high variance), am a car passenger for about 1500 miles per year, and take the train for about 4000 miles per year. My bike mileage over the past 10 years has varied between about 500 and 4000 miles per year. The figure of 15000 miles per year was an average figure per American I picked up without citation. The figures from North American Transportation Statistics give a total of 6981 billion passenger km travelled in personal vehicles in 2002. For a population of 293 million (CIA world factbook 2004) that gives 23825 km per person per year, or 14891 miles per person. There are 225,936,138 personal vehicles (ibid, different table) (of which c. 130 million are cars and 90 million are light trucks), which travelled 4,241 billion km, or about 11728 miles per vehicle per year, so my figures for mileage per vehicle a a little high, but not drastically so. My figures for personal mileage were right, though. I just didn't figure it'd be that different from vehicle mileage.

    As for the amount of energy to dispose of a car, my previous citation says

    In all cases, they [MacLean and Lave] chose not to analyze environmental impacts from the recycling and disposal stage, because they agreed with earlier studies indicating that the environmental impacts of manufacture and use greatly outweighed those of disposal. They based their analysis on a 1990 Ford Taurus, assuming a vehicle lifetime of approximately 14 years and a fuel efficiency of 21.8 mpg.
    The 120 GJ for manufacture includes all manufacturing costs. I'd say that implictly includes delivery to the customer. In the case of the 800kg car I drive most frequently, it was shipped by sea about 8 or 10 000 miles and then delivered by vehicle transporter about 200 miles. I'd say that's pretty negligible (sea transport uses orders of magnitude less energy per mile than road transport).

    I stand by my original observation that it's wrong to say that it costs more energy to replace a light truck with a hybrid car than it saves in using a hybrid car, but would still point out that that seems to me to be a straw man. In terms of actual choice when replacing a vehicle, then from an energy efficiency point of view, the hybrid wins. Whether it wins as compared to a high efficiency diesel is a moot point. As 9 million cars are replaced each year, along with 8 million trucks (SUVs & minivans are counted in this category), it seems that concentrating on halving the energy emissions of approximately 1/13th of the fleet would make a significant impact, along with encouraging end of life cars to be taken out of the economy slightly faster. When you consider that new cars are likely to be driven much higher mileages, then the figures look better still.

    In short, it's not a magic bullet, but it's a good start.

  22. Diesel? by faedle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the things that always has me kinda scratching my head is why nobody's making a diesel hybrid.

    It would seem that with diesel's natual tendancy towards lower engine RPMs (and with most diesel engines delivering peak torque around 2500 RPM), it would make a natural fit towards a design like Toyota's (generating power which is applied to the wheels by electric motors).

    In fact, that is how railroad locomotives work.

    Plus, there are all kinds of advantages to using a diesel engine, including the fact that the raw materials for diesel fuel need not just be petroleum.. diesel fuel has been engineered from coal and vegetable oil, and can theoretically (although I personally haven't seen practicle examples) be made from methane.

    If VW can make a turbodiesel New Beetle that can average 40-50MPG out of just swapping the gasoline engine for a diesel one, what could they do if they engineered a smaller diesel + electric motor combo?