Top Ten Advances in 2004
An anonymous reader writes "Technology Research News has released it's top
ten picks for advances of 2004. Something for everyone here including notable advances in biotechnology, communications, computing, engineering, energy, security, nanotechnology, applied physics and the Internet."
Is Space Ship One?
There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
It's all cool stuff but nothing truly revolutionary. Where's my flying car? My transporter? I think that in 50 or a 100 years, life will be pretty much the same, except stuff will be smaller, quieter, and maybe cheaper.
China's implimentation of IPV6 was pretty cool...
Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
Stem cells, and spaceship one didn't even make the list!? If this were in a standard Newspaper, I'd say it'd belong in the opinion section.
Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3576594. stm
- This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
Suppose you were testing a new drug for some life-threatening/disabling disease. Suppose also that there are alternative treatments available. Should your control group go without any treatment at all?
The Get the Facts campaign from Microsoft. Maybe is not an advance that help humanity, but is a clear demostration to how far into the insanity realm could be reached just playing with numbers.
I'd put in for China's plan to expand their energy generation.
But the article is about technilogical advancements that have occured this year. While admirable, China's plan is to IMPLEMENT a technology that has been around for quite a while. If there is any sort of advancement in that plan, I would submit that it is their forward thinking in energy policy that is new to the world. Most of the other governments don't seem to have grasped that concept yet.
Seriously, please read some of the other posts in this thread, especially joak's (who thinks I'm misinformed, btw).
Then also read this: Cambodia's Premier Halts Planned Trials of AIDS Drug
Please clarify: is it short-sighted to ask the question of ethics, or just short-sighted to take a position against placebos in particular (which I did not)?
Is there or can there be a better way than what your were taught in science class? Was this matter solved in Hensinki in 1964?
P.S. Where does my IQ enter into all of this? I felt your knee jerk all the way over here.
To all the high schoolers out there:
Remember this when you take your college entrance tests. My ACT english score rose by 4 when someone told me to remember that. It was on the test 3 or 4 times.