Slashdot Mirror


Comet Machholz Now Visible to Naked Eye

An anonymous reader submits "A comet discovered only this summer is brightening quickly and already visible to the unaided eye. Comet Macholz should be visible to the unaided eye until late January. On the night of January 7 - 8, it will sail about 2 degrees (4 Moon widths) to the west of the easily recognisable Pleiades star cluster, often known as the Seven Sisters. It will be at its closest to Earth Jan. 5-6, 2005, when it will be 32 million miles away." (Mentioned a few days ago, too.)

30 comments

  1. Obligatory by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    "I make it a point to never to turn my head unless I expect to see something, Bart. Naturally, we can't see your comet in broad daylight and without a telescope."
    On Topic, will this be visible from the sothern hemisphere?

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    1. Re:Obligatory by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm looking at Starry Night.

      Its visible about 20 degrees in the sky to the north, after 10:30pm adelaide time.

      I went to see it 2 days ago (after the first slashdot story) but it was cloudy... and its cloudy every damn day.

      I suggest you drive up north up port wakefield road somewhere to get away from the city lights to somewhere real dark to try and look, but only if the weather cooperates.

      In a few days time you won't see it at all as it won't appear above the horizon at all for us southern hemisphere observers. Northen hemisphere observers are in for a real treat I think.

      D.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the Pleiades?

    3. Re:Obligatory by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blasted clouds... well, I'm off to invent some kind of cloud transparent making machine.

      I haven't seen anything that says this baby should be seen in Adelaide (or the southern hemisphere at all). I wish it wasn't so cloudy... I'd head out and have a look.

      Whatever you do, don't turn left just before Pt Wakefield (heading north) .. there is some sort of army proving ground out there and we were hassled by police for even turning down that road to stop and look up late one night.

      A.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
  2. It's all over now. by Mish · · Score: 2, Funny
    A comet discovered only this summer is brightening quickly and already visible to the unaided eye. Comet Macholz should be visible to the unaided eye until late January...
    ...At which point it'll impact the earth and no-longer be visable? ;)
    1. Re:It's all over now. by Tersevs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where's Bruce Willis when you need him? :-)

      BTW: It's discoverer tells the tale of how it was found here. Amazing what you can do with a telescope that the parents bought for Christmas 1968.

    2. Re:It's all over now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if Bruce fails?

    3. Re:It's all over now. by Tersevs · · Score: 1

      It doesnt matter. It's a win-win situation. Either Bruce manages to blow the thing into little pieces... and if he doesnt? Hey, we got rid of Bruce Willis! :-) Yay!

  3. Obligatory Conspiracy Theory by bruthasj · · Score: 1

    Since this is slashdot:

    mach -> make
    holz -> wood
    newly discovered comet -> new star

    It's the making of Wormwood! Forget all that Chernobyl hocus pocus. Maybe when Tempel 1 gets impacted, a piece will hit machholz causing it to make a direct course for Earth.

    We're doomed!

    1. Re:Obligatory Conspiracy Theory by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      It's the making of Wormwood!

      I was made over thirty years ago, thank you very much...

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  4. Darn useless NASA by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 2, Funny

    What good are all those billions we spend for NASA's budget, when we don't even have a single hydrogen bomb-carrying spaceship? Can we trust the Space Administration to be able to dig up even a single team of expert oil drillers to blow up Machholz once it's inevitably revealed as the Texas-sized planet killer it surely is? I think not.

    1. Re:Darn useless NASA by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we spent as much money on space exploration as we spent on lame-ass movies, everbody would own a comet by now!

    2. Re:Darn useless NASA by helioquake · · Score: 1

      Man what you said sounds crazy enough that our prez may actually buy it! More budget for NASA, whooray!

  5. Argh by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

    Perihelion is wednesday and snow is predicted all week here in Michigan. I need to move to a better climate.

    --
    ||:|::
    1. Re:Argh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the feeling. I bought a new telescope and had clouds for a month. They cleared up for one night, the night of December 7 (Jupiter Occultation (awful seeing conditions, though)). Since then it's either been cloudy or really, really cold.

      Next clear night I'm taking out the binoculars and telescope and checking this comet out (and luckily it's winter break so I can stay out all night). Although I just checked my local forecast and it's storms or clouds for the next week and a half.

    2. Re:Argh by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      It's nice and clear here in southern Saskatchewan... but it's -38 degrees C too (-36 to you obsolete Fahrenheiters ;) ). Hmm. Let's take a survey to see which is better. :) MAN FOUND DEAD, FROZEN IN FIELD Wrote note: "Comet is Gorgeous!"

  6. Naked Eye by Captain+Chad · · Score: 2, Informative

    From one of the articles: "In binoculars, look for an object that is fuzzy compared with the much more distant stars."

    This doesn't really meet my definition of "naked eye." I guess I was expecting something like the Hale-Bopp comet which was easily visible to the unaided, naked eye. This one appears to be much farther away.

    --
    Check out Chad's News
    1. Re:Naked Eye by fvbommel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the same article: "It should be visible to the unaided eye until late January..."

      I think what they meant was it will be visible to the naked eye, but if you look at it through binoculars it will be fuzzy compared to the stars.

    2. Re:Naked Eye by qurk · · Score: 1
      You can actually see it with the naked eye. I saw it early in December when it was down below Orion and to the right of the Rabbit or whatever those 6 stars are. It was pretty unglamourous, and I could barely make it out, after looking for a long time. It basically just looked like a fuzzy spot, much like the Orion Nebula, but even more dim. Also this is way out here in the boonies pretty far from cities, with the moon pretty newish that night. (Couldn't find my stinking binoculars!!)

      Unfortunately, not much like Hale-Bopp...we were very very lucky with that comet. Do you remember being able to see it even in the middle of the day? You could watch it sink down to the horizon and a few hours later pop up again... it was so pretty.

    3. Re:Naked Eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's about how it looked to me last night at about 11:30pm PST (willamette valley, OR).

      Of course, unlike Hale-Bopp, it actually did appear to be an even brighter smudge of light, with a barely discernable "bright" area in the middle of it (cheap 10x50 binocs), whereas Hale-Bopp seemed to disappear for me when looking in binocs at it (I was outside of Joshua Tree, CA looking at H-B).

      Only a couple of more good nights of clear, cold viewing here in Oregon. It's supposed to get cloudy Thursday...

  7. "Visible to the naked eye..." by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...in my experience means: "Visible to the naked eye of an experienced observer under the age of 40 with good eyesight whose eyes have been dark-adapted for at least half an hour, on a clear night in dry weather with no moon, at time at least three hours after sunset or three hours when the object is at least 40 degrees above the horizon, on a hill with dry air at least a fifty miles from any town with a population of over 2,000 ."

    If you can see and count seven Pleiades and if you are in a place where you would notice the Milky Way without anyone mentioning it to you, then, sure, it might be visible to the naked eye.

    To the average Joe stumbling out into his suburban backward, it's not all that conspicuous even in binoculars.

    Telling people that the comet is "visible to the naked eye" is just setting them up for disappointment, particularly after they've seen innumerable big-observatory long-exposure photos showing huge comets with long dramatic tails... or cartoons where the animator has somehow gotten comets confused with bolides.

    The last time Halley's came around, a Boston Globe columnist trotted out the usual mantra about finding a spot on a hill far from city lights. So, with some persistence, I phoned him up and said that I was really tired of columns telling me to find a spot on a hill far from city lights that didn't tell me where to find such a hill within thirty miles of Boston. I mean, Great Blue Hill with its spectacular view of the dazzling city lights of Boston is exactly what you don't want. He said "I really have no answer for you. There is a place I go to but it's sixty miles from Boston and it's private property."

    When you have a really good view of the sky, which I've had maybe half a dozen times in my life, it's hard to find the constellations because you see too many starts. The bright stars that the H. A. Rey diagrams connect with dots are almost lost in a sparkly mist of hundreds of other visible stars that seem nearly as bright. I'm convinced that the ancients did not see the constellations as stick figures, but as three-dimensional solid images in those sparkly clouds. I've no doubt that under those circumstances, the comet would be a conspicious and truly "naked-eye" object.

    1. Re:"Visible to the naked eye..." by goober · · Score: 1

      ...in my experience means: "Visible to the naked eye of an experienced observer under the age of 40 with good eyesight whose eyes have been dark-adapted for at least half an hour, on a clear night in dry weather with no moon, at time at least three hours after sunset or three hours when the object is at least 40 degrees above the horizon, on a hill with dry air at least a fifty miles from any town with a population of over 2,000 ."

      Exactly right. Take back the night. Learn how to curb light pollution at darksky.org.

    2. Re:"Visible to the naked eye..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The last time Halley's came around, a Boston Globe columnist trotted out the usual mantra about finding a spot on a hill far from city lights. So, with some persistence, I phoned him up and said that I was really tired of columns telling me to find a spot on a hill far from city lights that didn't tell me where to find such a hill within thirty miles of Boston. I mean, Great Blue Hill with its spectacular view of the dazzling city lights of Boston is exactly what you don't want. He said "I really have no answer for you. There is a place I go to but it's sixty miles from Boston and it's private property."
      A local astronomy club is usually a good source to find out about good viewing spots. A few years back for a meteor shower I looked on the website of a local club which suggested several dark places within about a 45 minute drive. Went to one and had great viewing. And I live in the NYC area!
    3. Re:"Visible to the naked eye..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you can see and count seven Pleiades and if you are in a place where you would notice the Milky Way without anyone mentioning it to you, then, sure, it might be visible to the naked eye."

      Surprisingly enough, I actually live in such a place.

    4. Re:"Visible to the naked eye..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry for you. Give the sheep my regards.

  8. Re:Starry Night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My Dad has a copy of that program, and I saw the comet on the screen with it, but here too, it's been cloudy all the time.

    Anyway, in the same way that you can zoom in on the ISS, or DirecTV sattelites and eventually see all the details as if you were standing next to them, you should be able to zoom in on objects like comets for which there is not enough data for a close up, and the program should make up comical and amusing scenery.

    For instance: Zoom in on mars, and you might see Opertunity. If you watch for a few seconds, little cartoon green elves with faces resembling The Pep Boys walk up to the rover bearing rags and Windex and start washing the solar panels.

    For a comet closeup, you could see Bruce Willis standing on it waving back at you.

    It would be cool to see Marvin the Martian and the Hairy just-add-water monsters running around, or Monoliths on the moon, and in orbit around Jupiter. Science fiction characters with specified locations could populate the known universe. Huge Green Froggish People from Omicron Persei Eight...

  9. I can vouch by marcus · · Score: 1

    From here in Texas near Dallas, the shores of Lake Tawakoni to be exact, I saw it true naked eye on Saturday night. A definite little fuzzball south southwest of the Pleiades. Simply, at 10PM or so go stand outside for a while and avoid looking at any lights. Face south and then look straight up. You should see the Pleiades almost overhead and Orion to the east. Follow a line from Bellatrix (HIS left shoulder as he faces you) through his his outstretched arm to his bow and keep going until you've crossed south of the Pleiades.

    Using some good medium/compact 8x40 binocs and averted vision I could pick up a tail drifting off to the east northeast. Can't see it at all from the city as it has been cloudy since we got back in town. I plan to take my big astro-binocs, telescope, and camera next weekend. :-)

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  10. O-oh.... by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

    Comet: it makes your face turn green
    O, Comet: it smells like Listerine!
    O, Comet: It makes you vomit
    So buy some Comet and vomit today!

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    1. Re:O-oh.... by UWC · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I've always heard "gasoline" instead of "Listerine." And I can't decide whether I've heard "tastes" instead of "smells" or not.

    2. Re:O-oh.... by marcus · · Score: 1

      "Makes things look real clean"

      --
      Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
      - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO