Slashdot Mirror
New DRM Scheme To Make Current DVD Players Obsolete
Oneflower writes "ExtremeTech reports that a proposed new DRM scheme could make current DVD players obsolete. The scheme, from Hewlett-Packard and Philips, targets DVD+R and DVD+RW and is an attempt to enforce the FCC broadcast flag on DVD recorders."
DVD-R is the preferred recordable DVD flavor for movies these days. It's cheaper than +R and more compatible with DVD players.
FU CARLY
And a hack will be made, a firmware update released and in the end we will be back to what we are doing today.
Weird thing is, they seem to acknowledge that:
From TFA: "In large part, the issue with the new players will solve itself," said Chris Buma, an A/V program manager with Philips Consumer Electronics, at a press conference held by the DVD+RW Alliance here. "It is a restriction, but a restriction that can be overcome."
One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
is a must read. The FCC is going to lose this one because they clearly don't have the authority to require the Broadcast Flag.
Thank your local bespeckled "digitally-savvy" Librarian for this one (and yes, I'm trained as a Librarian -- we do care about ensuring digital rights).
My Panasonic -R recorder has already refused to record several movies because it detected a copyright flag.
This is a standalone unit and you were trying to record from an analog source right? Sounds like macrovision.
You were probably trying to record another DVD or VHS tape by playing it into the panasonic.
This new stupidity from HP is about digital recordings only.
BTW, for about $60 you can buy a "video clarifier" from radio shack which will effectively strip macrovision from the analog video allowing you to record it.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
By law June 2005 is the last month any equipment can be made to ignore broadcast flags.
This is the new standard whether we like it or not since many dvd makers will be fined if they do not include the drm.
Isn't corruption great?
http://saveie6.com/
Uh... No, not confusing acronyms. DivX was a Circit City invention of a variant on DVDs that required you to pay money for everytime you watched a disk after the first three times. The players would dial home to a central server and bill your credit card. The idea failed miserably and in its honor the DivX codec was named. I have had troubles with this at work where people thought I was talking about the circuit city product and not the codec.
Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
Actually, from R'ing TFA, the article headline is very misleading. This will not make any change to current DVD players. It makes changes to make the recorders obey the evil bit/broadcast flag.
The fact that they expect the media and the players to cost more once this is in place (so Hitachi can get their royalties of course) is going to slow adoption of this.
Cheers
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
DVD-R is the preferred recordable DVD flavor for movies these days. It's cheaper than +R and more compatible with DVD players.
ROFL. Slashdot man speaks with forked tongue.
DVD+R was designed specifically to have a format that is compatible with the DVD-movie standard. In other words, a DVD movie player doesn't even need to know about DVD+R to be able to play movies written to a DVD+R disk. It's hard to get more compatible than that, and I'm proving the compatibility daily on my antique DVD movie-only players.
No other DVD format is compatible with DVD movie in this way. All the other formats require the player to have been programmed explicitly to handle them.
1) DVD handles chapter forward and back (a VHS doesn't DO that...) and via the remote (and in some cases, on the front panel...) you can fast-forward/reverse in at least 4-5 different speeds and slow-forward at at least 2-3 different speeds. Now some discs have some obnoxious feature that prevent you from doing this sort of thing to the "previews" (ads?) on the disc- but they're actually in the very small minority of late because people bitched about that... Item 1 on your list has pretty much been a non-issue since the beginning- always HAS been.
2) Tape's much worse- haven't you seen VHS tapes strewn across roadways by rowdy teenieboppers? All it'd take to ruin a tape is to give it a couple of swirlies, moosh food or spill juice/kool-aid into the thing, or stick one's fingers into the loader gaps in the door (which little fingers would be adept at doing) and PULL (ooh... Such fun that!). DVD's can be snapped and scratched up- the other "mishaps" that would trash a VHS tape don't even figure into a DVD, they're non-problems. Light to medium scratching can usually be ignored by a player and when it isn't, one can typically resurface the optical portion of the disk with various products on the market, which do, amazingly work well.
Simply put, neither of your reasons work as being valid concerns. (And the people that modded you up as "Interesting" never went through this little mental exercise to see if you really were "Interesting"...)
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
+R is significantly less compatible.