Slashdot Mirror
Wired's 2004 Vaporware Awards
l3pYr writes "Based on user submissions, Wired Magazine has posted its 2004 Vaporware Awards. Duke Nukem Forever has garnered the 'Lifetime Achievement Award,' so it doesn't - officially - make the list. Some of the lucky winners this year are: Alienware, Valve, Microsoft, Apple and TiVo."
Seriously. Does anybody actually use the beta/alpha version of it for anything? RMS has been promising it for such a long time.. especially after Linux took the GNU team by surprise.
I think it's fair for Apple to be on the list with the 3 Ghz claim, though they should have shared the honor with IBM. After all, Apple was just going off whatever they were told by IBM's R&D folks.
And this years price for the "Worst Article and Poor journalism" -award goes to... Wired!
Also special commendation on "How to build a website almost rivaling Geocities in how horrible it looks like" -award goes to Wired!
Apparently your product is now vaporware if it slips a quarter. I think by that definition every computer game I've ever played has at some point been vaporware...
--
Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.
WAAAA! Your promised me I could buy $piece_of_crap by Q4 2004. Its already January 7th of 2005! Oh, the humanity!! !IWANIT!!IW ANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT!! /spoiled brat mode
IWANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT!!IWANIT
who cares...
for not meeting their projected processor speed targets. Granted, they were over-hyped but the real reason they did not meet the targets is because both Intel and IBM ran into a lot of unforseen roadblocks when they went to 90 nm technology. I would hardly call that "vaporware".
Unlike Duke Nukem Forever, they were both going into uncharted waters, and it's really no surprise that they didn't make it to their destination as fast as they had wanted to....
Monstar L
As I've always understood it, "Vaporware" refers to products that do not exist, and are thus all "vapor" and hype. Once you show a demo or have a working model that does what you claimed it would do from the outset, it ought not be called Vaporware, even if it has been delayed.
DNF is a great example, since after a decade we havn't even seen a working demo, a gameplay video, or even any (recent) screenshots. I think labeling products as "vaporware" when they are just late is a bit unfair. Many products miss ship dates and experience delays, but it takes a special kind of bastard to start a marketing campaign before they've even written a line of code or built a prototype.
--This sig is in beta. Please let us know abut any errors you find.
They were *really* stretching to get this list to 10 ... I guess things are pretty good in the world of vaporware given the bottom 3.
How long does it really take to make a 3d game when you're using someone elses engine?! First, it was supposed to use the Quake 2 engine. Then it switched over to the Unreal engine. It must have switched again because the Unreal engine is ancient by any standard.
My guess is that the owners of 3D Realms have enough money where they just don't give a rat's ass.
Does anyone here actually work for 3D Realms?! What's going on over there?!
If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
As I've always understood it, "Vaporware" refers to products that do not exist, and are thus all "vapor" and hype. Once you show a demo or have a working model that does what you claimed it would do from the outset, it ought not be called Vaporware, even if it has been delayed.
No. Anybody can fake up working model and/or show a rigged demo. Even an officially-released product is technically vaporware until it ends up in the hands of at least one customer.
~Philly
What about the SCO Group's evidence that Linux contains Unix source code?
After nearly two years and Darl McBride's claims of "mountains of code" you'd think they'd have shown something by now.
--
It works.
Free Flat Screens | Free iPod Photo
infested with jello like fishes no melotron wishes
I wonder why SCO didn't make the list with its claims of infringing code in Linux.
My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.
You'd have to give the award to the users who don't bother to switch, not the OS. I've been using Linux as a desktop for years.
I think they missed something very key. The other big (in my opinion... the true #1) is the proof that SCO supposedly has and keeps promising to show the world about the Unix code in Linux. They managed to start lots of lawsuits and even gained a few licensees. However, on numerous occasions they promised to "show the proof", yet they have yet to do so. We're coming up on year three and to date, no one has seen any damning code... not even those that signed the NDA.
its funny because you replied like these were somehow "facts". its kind of like if i memorized all the episodes of carebares and then made an analysis - seriously - over a few statements that such and such was true (pink carebares are better than blue) or something.
I just find it funny that indepth "thinking" about a book that has been translated many times and re written at least twice. I cannot believe that people think it has anything to do with reality at all. i guess its kind of like starwars geeks debating over who shot first. maybe in 2000 years they will wage holly wars about it... the hansades - as it were.
Amazingly, some people enjoy learning about the culture, lifestyles, and thought processes of people different from themselves. Just that not very many people like this are on slashdot.
Secession is the right of all sentient beings.
Intel came closer to the mark than Apple did, thus Intel's lower ranking.
It doesn't matter if Apple is reliant on another company. If they can't deliver, then they shouldn't make the promise.
Good research, I'm Christian and I never really thought about it like that. It's good to see an actual insightful religious post on Slashdot, as opposed to the usual "Christians are retards LOL"
Slashdot sucks
Just a thought, but technically speaking, wouldn't Christ's 2nd coming be when he rose from the dead three days after he died on the cross?
/if you believe in that kind of thing
So you see, it is more complicated than picking a couple of quotes to rationalize a position. This also shows how your approach is futile. You hold a complex, apolegetic interpretation and you furthermore assume that this was the way early christians interpreted it. But you don't know that and you can't show that based just a couple of biblical quotes.
You are guilty of the same thing. Unless you were alive during the 1st century AD. I see no proof of your statements.