Slashdot Mirror


IT and Natural Disasters

rikomatic writes "The Asian tsunami in December has dramatically shown how much SMS, email and the web are now indispensible parts of disaster recovery. The folks at the Digital Divide Network have organized a virtual conference on 'How New Media and the Internet are Reshaping Tsunami Relief Efforts' on Wednesday, Jan 12 at 10am, EST. Among the featured speakers will be Dina Mehta, co-founder of the Southeast Asia Earthquake and Tsunami Blog. In the hours following the tsunami, she and a group of South Asian bloggers created the volunteer-driven web portal for tsunami relief news and resources. Beyond using IT to coordinate post-disaster relief efforts, early warning is another critical need. Hopefully the UN's World Conference on Disaster Reduction in Kobe, Japan later this month will address the IT infrastructure needed to make sure that people get advance warning before the next natural disaster strikes."

157 comments

  1. SMS? by mboverload · · Score: 1

    SMS? That has got to be the slowest way to cordinate anything... EVER.

    1. Re:SMS? by BaldGhoti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you get only twenty seconds of network coverage a day, SMS is far superior to actually making a phonecall. One can only assume that a majority of the cell towers in the area were disabled or destroyed.

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
    2. Re:SMS? by svvampy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      SMSs can make it over a patchy network when voice calls will not. It also allows easier cataloging and management of multiple nodes. Instead of having a person to speak to every remote outpost a computer can aggregate status reports, help requests and so on.

    3. Re:SMS? by mboverload · · Score: 1

      The small screen and crappy interface don't help, either. I mean, the menus for phones are the WORST I have seen on almost any device. I could have designed a better menu than those people did.

    4. Re:SMS? by Agret · · Score: 2, Funny

      NEED HLP FST PLZ SND ASAP!

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    5. Re:SMS? by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      Yet millions upon millions of teenagers (and young adults) seem to be able to use it every day - to very great abandon.

      Crappy interface or simplicity of use?

      ps. I'm talking Scandinavian markets especially here, but also other European and Australian. The US is way behind on use of SMS.

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    6. Re:SMS? by QuickFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      SMS? That has got to be the slowest way to cordinate anything... EVER.

      Cellphone network operators can broadcast one SMS simultaneously to all cellphones in an area. If they had broadcast a tsunami warning by SMS right after the earthquake, a huge number of people would have been saved. Not only rich people with cellphones would be saved, since they would spread the warning to people around them, and those in turn would spread the warning further.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    7. Re:SMS? by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's an unintended consequence of having ubiquitous mobile phone reception: it's much easier to locate bodies in piles of rubble.

      It sounds pretty strange, but friends/family constantly ringing your mobile phone to check that you're OK tends to lead rescuers straight to you. Morbidly, it's also much easier to recover corpses this way as well (still-charged phones attached to corpses).

    8. Re:SMS? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I'm sure rich people would be far too elitist to assist their fellow man.

      --
      I don't get it.
    9. Re:SMS? by clive_p · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they can do that? I can't see any reference to SMS broadcast in the GSM specifications (though it's a dense document, could easily have missed it). As far as I know the operators currently would have to send out large numbers of SMS messages individually addressed. If the cellphone firmware were modified, then potentially one message could be received by all in range of a given base station. That would indeed be a good way of sending out warnings of tsunamis, lava flows, tornadoes, etc.

    10. Re:SMS? by NBV · · Score: 1

      i agree on certan networks an at particular times it can take a while for SMS's to get through i dont seem to have too many probs with my nokia 7610 http://www.phones2udirect.co.uk/Products/type/phon es/ProductID/2581/NetworkID/6/Nokia_7610.asp on vodafone, i tried sending them from web based program or ICQ, which seems ok maybe you could try that?

    11. Re:SMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only rich people have cell phones. Where I live (Romania), and it's not a rich country by any means, even house keepers have cellphones. They've become indispensable.

    12. Re:SMS? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Is SMS more standard in that part of the world? Here in the US I don't even think you can send an SMS message from most cell network providers. Seems like having a warning system with a loud siren (similar to areas in the midwest where we have tornado warning sirens) in coastal areas would make more sense. You could even have it be triggered remotely from monitoring locations.

    13. Re:SMS? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they can do that? I can't see any reference to SMS broadcast in the GSM specifications (though it's a dense document, could easily have missed it).

      An engineer friend told me this, but maybe I misunderstood what he said.

      Even if they have to be sent individually I think it would be very efficient. In the days after the tsunami the government of my country, Sweden, used SMS to try to locate the 20 000 Swedes in the affected region. They simply sent SMS to all mobiles in the region that had a Swedish subscription.

      (Of course this was just one of several means used to try to find them.)

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    14. Re:SMS? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Here in the US I don't even think you can send an SMS message from most cell network providers.

      I believe this is one of the few areas where US lags behind Europe and some other regions. Here in Sweden SMS is taken for granted.

      Seems like having a warning system with a loud siren (similar to areas in the midwest where we have tornado warning sirens) in coastal areas would make more sense.

      Of course you wouldn't have just one warning system. You also need warnings by siren, radio, TV etc.

      The important advantage of SMS is that it's already there. Arranging a system of sirens in such a huge region will take time. Note that you also have to inform people about their meaning. Still it must be done. But the SMS system should be set up now, quickly, since it can be done quickly.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    15. Re:SMS? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " I'm talking Scandinavian markets especially here, but also other European and Australian. The US is way behind on use of SMS."

      Yeah I guess so.

      What exactly IS sms?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:SMS? by clive_p · · Score: 1

      Yes I heard about that, and that seems an excellent use of SMS. But each SMS message occupies the control channel for at least some milliseconds, so sending millions of message fast enough to warn of a tsunami would seem to be difficult without some broadcast mechanism. Here in the UK the number of text messages sent around midnight on 31st December was sufficient to swamp the system and many did not get delivered for several hours.

    17. Re:SMS? by funkdancer · · Score: 1
      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    18. Re:SMS? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Is the bottleneck really in the transmission through the control channel? Keep in mind that not all those millions of phones are in the same cell, so different transmissions can occur at the same time in different cells. To calculate the time needed for transmission of all those messages through the control channel, I think you should calculate the number of phones in the largest cell.

      I get the impression that when these systems are swamped, the bottleneck is in a central spot where all the messages are handled, a centrally placed computer or group of computers. If that's correct, it seems to me that you could upgrade the capacity at a reasonable cost, since computer capacity is cheap.

      I suppose you notice that I don't really know any details. I'm just saying what seems likely to me.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    19. Re:SMS? by clive_p · · Score: 1

      Yes you may well be right. I don't know much about the details of SMS systems either. It would probably be easier to simply add more capacity to message centers than to get an agreed change to the GSM specification *and* altered firmware in the phones themselves. But in the long term, it seems to me that an SMS broadcast facility would be very valuable, and could be life-saving, in cases where warnings have to be widely circulated in a short period of time. I'll try to take this up in some forum where there may be experts lurking, and see what the reaction is.

    20. Re:SMS? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      I'll try to take this up in some forum where there may be experts lurking, and see what the reaction is.

      Good idea. Maybe the idea will spread and reach the right people. Good luck!

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  2. Geospatial support for natural disasters by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sure this isn't the only Geospatial vendor but ESRI pretty much makes their software, technical support and data free to agencies supporting disasters. For the Indian Ocean disaster, check out this link.

    1. Re:Geospatial support for natural disasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the least popular detergent in Indonesia?

      Tide.

  3. IT and natural disasters by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bringing the traffic accidents of the world to a screen near you.

  4. Slashdotting a relief resource link? by switcha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure there are people who need to look at that info more than we do.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  5. MMM by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A US investment in "event specific" WiFi and VoIP deployments would both prepare the "Homeland" for disasters, natural and manmade, and put American companies at the forefront of the emerging Mobile Multimedia Millennium that's turning the WWW upside down. Our flexible media industry could take disasters in stride, offering lots of lucrative training during planned events that will reduce costs and increase lifesaving efficiency during emergencies. In the meantime, it would create jobs, taxable profits, and make the US a lot more fun.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:MMM by stimpleton · · Score: 1

      "In the meantime, it would create jobs, taxable profits, and make the US a lot more fun.

      If it reaps benefits to America's industry of only a fraction of those from its involvement in the 2nd World War, then yes, you would indeed be onto a winner.

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  6. Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All other efforts will be in vain. That was the real tragedy in the Tsunami- and it's the reason why a similar event won't cause this large loss of life in the Pacific. We've already got the instruments needed to detect an earthquake as it happens anywhere in the world- the next step is where we failed. There should have been a major warning given out to every government, every police station, every military installation in the area that an earthquake had already happened and to get people away from the seashore.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Without communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention Marxist Hacker 42: You forgot to place the blame squarely at the feet of George W. Bush, John Ashcroft and Dick Cheney like you normally do. Not getting enough sleep?

    2. Re:Without communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've already got the instruments needed to detect an earthquake as it happens anywhere in the world- the next step is where we failed. There should have been a major warning given out to every government, every police station, every military installation in the area that an earthquake had already happened

      Detecting an earthquake might take just a few minutes, but locating and then figuring out depth and magnitude takes a lot of time. If the earthquake is deep, no tsunami. If it is shallow, maybe tsunami. Loss of life may be averted in the Pacific, but that is because of the tsunami monitoring system which monitors, surpisingly enough, for tsunamis, not earthquakes.

      90% of the earthquakes on the planet happen in the Pacific, which is why there is a monitoring system there and not everywhere.

      If we sent out a call the minute every strong earthquake happened, no one would listen because tsunamis are few and far between.

    3. Re:Without communication by dustinbarbour · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if the tsunami had been smaller than expected? All you;d hear is "Look at those idiots at the earthquak/tsunami warning center! They cost the government of "country here" $XXX dollars for no reason! They shall burn ni hell!"

    4. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And if the tsunami had been smaller than expected? All you;d hear is "Look at those idiots at the earthquak/tsunami warning center! They cost the government of "country here" $XXX dollars for no reason! They shall burn ni hell!"

      One of the many reasons to ignore COST when it comes to GOVENRMENT. Providing for the common welfare is often far more expensive than the greedy misers known as the rich would be willing to pay for. FAR better to cost several billion dollars of economic dislocation than lose a single human life- but then that's coming from somebody who actually believes that human live is valuable. Not all would agree.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Without communication by drseuk · · Score: 1

      In Cumbria in the UK, we've had severe (for the UK that is) flooding and high winds this week.
      No mains power. Phone landlines are out. Transport virtually zero. Many mobile devices have been drowned. Those that haven't are getting their batteries drained as call volumes are, perhaps, 100 times normal call levels as everyone tries to phone everyone else through jammed switchboards. No mains power = no recharge.
      The lucky few who can get through to the local radio station (BBC Cumbria - who are doing a great job btw) can get a request sequentially broadcast to everyone (on air / on the Beeb's site).
      I've set up a blog and suggested we use a specific IRC channel, but it's chicken and egg getting this information to the undeterminable set of people who still have working connectivity. Of course if we'd agreed where to meet online prior to events (or if the radio would announce it as I've requested)...we'd have a blog + channel with hundreds of people who could relay information from / to others nearby in a much more network efficient manner. As it is, it's only the selfless spirit of community with everyone mucking in that's holding back the tide.

    6. Re:Without communication by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      FAR better to cost several billion dollars of economic dislocation than lose a single human life...

      I disagree. Human life is valuable, yes: that means that it has a value. At $50,000/yr for 50 years, that's $2.5 million earned--you're saying that it's fine to incur thousands of times more than the average person earns (his earnings, of course, measure his economic contribution to society). That's insane, and a very quick way to go bankrupt.

      Building a tsunami readiness centre is like anything else: there's a cost, and there's a benefit. Considering the unlikelihood of a tsunami, the benefit is neglible, practically non-existent.

    7. Re:Without communication by bstarrfield · · Score: 1

      So, what's the value of a human life if you work for $.25 per hour? How do you calculate the life of the poor?

      I suppose under your logic that we should invest money in protecting golf courses, yachts, etc. -- where, one must admit, the wealthy are likely to be found. So much better to save the life of someone who earns $25 million per year than to save the life of someone who earns $50,000. True, the probability of something happening to a golf course or yachting club is very low, but hey, the cost benefit analysis certainly ever so more logical.

      There needs to be a balance between accounting and morality. The value of a life must be more than what a person earns.

      --
      /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
    8. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Who ever said that I normally do that, and what do those politicians have to do with the incompetance of governments halfway around the world?

      Besides, it wasn't Bush, but Clinton- who signed NAFTA and started the WTO. Neo*s are all evil- doesn't matter if they're liberals or conservatives.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Detecting an earthquake might take just a few minutes, but locating and then figuring out depth and magnitude takes a lot of time.

      Yeah, but finding magnitude of a 6+ quake, the kind that makes Tsunamis, someplace in the area of the Indian Ocean- is damned obvious. Hawaii monitoring stations had it pinpointed within 5 minutes- but since there isn't a communications system in the Indian Ocean they had no idea who to call.

      If the earthquake is deep, no tsunami. If it is shallow, maybe tsunami. Loss of life may be averted in the Pacific, but that is because of the tsunami monitoring system which monitors, surpisingly enough, for tsunamis, not earthquakes.

      True enough to a certain extent- but a 6+ earthquake will almost guarantee a tsunami, and besides, Krakotoa in the Indian Ocean produced a tsunami in 1833 that was the twin of this one.

      90% of the earthquakes on the planet happen in the Pacific, which is why there is a monitoring system there and not everywhere.

      True enough- though this was predictable, it was the same fault line as Krakotoa.

      If we sent out a call the minute every strong earthquake happened, no one would listen because tsunamis are few and far between.

      But if say, an early warning was sent out with the earthquake, and Sumatra (closest shore) reported a Tsunami, the rest should have been warned, could have been warned, HOURS before- if there had been a communication system in place.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Human life is valuable, yes: that means that it has a value. At $50,000/yr for 50 years, that's $2.5 million earned--you're saying that it's fine to incur thousands of times more than the average person earns (his earnings, of course, measure his economic contribution to society). That's insane, and a very quick way to go bankrupt.

      Money itself is largely mythological to begin with- it's a matter of morality, not economics. Economics is mythological, and cost is just a figment of your imagination.

      Building a tsunami readiness centre is like anything else: there's a cost, and there's a benefit. Considering the unlikelihood of a tsunami, the benefit is neglible, practically non-existent.

      Given the existance of Krakotoa, the probability of a tsunami happening in the Indian Ocean within 500 years was very close to 100%. Heck, given the landslide potential in the Canary Islands the potential of a Tsunami wiping out Wall Street in the next 200 years is 100%. These things ARE predictible and likely- but if you'd rather have profit than public liberty and safety, then these things are not PROFITABLE.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      So, what's the value of a human life if you work for $.25 per hour?

      You should know the answer from the point of view of the corporations- human life is only worth the labor that it can produce, and should be paid for at as small a fraction of the value of that labor as possible.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      At $50,000/yr for 50 years, that's $2.5 million earned--you're saying that it's fine to incur thousands of times more than the average person earns (his earnings, of course, measure his economic contribution to society).

      2nd reply, because I missed this apparently error-prone assumption. NO for-profit business EVER gives a person earnings equal to his economic contribution to society- it's usually at least an order of magnitude less, sometimes FAR less. That's how profit is made- the difference between wages and value. Given that human labor is currently in surplus, the law of supply and demand means that $2.5 million earned over a lifetime probably represents $2.5 billion OR MORE in actual economic value.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Without communication by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Given the existance of Krakotoa, the probability of a tsunami happening in the Indian Ocean within 500 years was very close to 100%.

      How much would it cost to staff a tsunami centre for 500 years? How much would it cost to make every structure--even those which only last for a decade or two--tsunami-proof? Could that money be used for better purposes? Last I checked the tsunami killed about 150,000 people--that's 300 people a year for 500 years. Could that money be used to save 1,000 lives a year?

      It's not generally worth worrying about once-in-a-century disasters, much less twice-in-a-millennia ones, unless the costs are high enough. Asteroids probably fall into the not likely enough to be worth worrying about category even given the amount of damage one could do, simply because the odds are so low.

    14. Re:Without communication by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      I'm just pointing out that spending billions to save a life is stupid. Lives do have value--whatever it is. Yes, we're all children of God, and yes one shouldn't be able to just buy and sell lives--but it doesn't make sense to spend billions to save a single life. If that were true, cars would go no faster than 5 miles an hours and be protected with forty feet of pillows.

    15. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      How much would it cost to staff a tsunami centre for 500 years?

      Given the type of technology we have in the Pacific? Aproximately (given the lower wages there) $8,760,000/country. You only need ONE person on duty in these places after all.

      How much would it cost to make every structure--even those which only last for a decade or two--tsunami-proof?

      Why would that be neccessary for salvation of HUMAN LIFE? Evacuate the people when the warning comes in, and be done with it.

      Could that money be used for better purposes? Last I checked the tsunami killed about 150,000 people--that's 300 people a year for 500 years. Could that money be used to save 1,000 lives a year?

      Once again, what kind of person is so morally bankrupt as to compare human life to money? In other words, shouldn't we be doing BOTH?

      It's not generally worth worrying about once-in-a-century disasters, much less twice-in-a-millennia ones, unless the costs are high enough. Asteroids probably fall into the not likely enough to be worth worrying about category even given the amount of damage one could do, simply because the odds are so low.

      Depends on your viewpoint- which do you want to maximize, the movement of little green pieces of paper or human potential? If the first, there's no need to EVER plan for disaster- because the cost of a disaster happening just means that a different set of people have the opportunity to become wealthy. If the second, no price is too high to save a human child that might become the next Einstien.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    16. Re:Without communication by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      $8,760,000/country

      How many countries involved? Half a dozen or so? So $52,560,000/year--$2,628,0000,000 over half a millennium in order to save 150,000 lives (let's imagine that they would all be saved, which is false): $175,000/person. That might actually be worthwhile, to tell the truth. Although I daresay a more in-depth analysis would probably reveal that the funds would be better allocated elsewhere.

      Could that money be used for better purposes? Last I checked the tsunami killed about 150,000 people--that's 300 people a year for 500 years. Could that money be used to save 1,000 lives a year?

      Once again, what kind of person is so morally bankrupt as to compare human life to money? In other words, shouldn't we be doing BOTH?

      In answer to the first question: a sane one. Human life is not infinitely valuable (although it is, of course, quite valuable, and any given individual's life is priceless to him). It would not, for example, be a good thing to spend all the money in the world to save the life of one man--everyone would starve to death, being unable to buy food.

      In answer to the second question: sure, it'd be great if we could do everything possible to save everyone's life from everything that could end it. But resources are finite (which is why money is finite: money is just a convenient representation of resources): we can't do everything. Thus one must consider what is a wise use of money and what is not. Eliminating malaria would use up a chunk of money, but it'd save more lives (certainly) for less money (probably) than creating a tsunami centre.

      It's a question of return on investment: how much can we improve how many people's lives, and how much does it cost? Money just tracks resources, and the decisions one makes on how those resources are allocated have very real effects on people's lives.

    17. Re:Without communication by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      How many countries involved? Half a dozen or so? So $52,560,000/year--$2,628,0000,000 over half a millennium in order to save 150,000 lives (let's imagine that they would all be saved, which is false): $175,000/person. That might actually be worthwhile, to tell the truth. Although I daresay a more in-depth analysis would probably reveal that the funds would be better allocated elsewhere.

      Not really- because given your original premise, that a person is only worth what they earn, most of those people over their working lifetime will be lucky to earn half that ammount. These ain't Americans we're talking about- these people would be VERY lucky to earn $17,500 a year, and in their culture that would make them rich.

      In answer to the first question: a sane one. Human life is not infinitely valuable (although it is, of course, quite valuable, and any given individual's life is priceless to him).

      Sane only by the idea that little pieces of paper are more important than human beings- and not realizing that the money supply is actually infinite.

      It would not, for example, be a good thing to spend all the money in the world to save the life of one man--everyone would starve to death, being unable to buy food.

      Nah, you'd just print up more money. Money has no reality, no actual value beyond what people believe it has. This is what causes inflation.

      In answer to the second question: sure, it'd be great if we could do everything possible to save everyone's life from everything that could end it. But resources are finite (which is why money is finite: money is just a convenient representation of resources

      No it isn't- money hasn't been a representation of actual resources in over 100 years.

      we can't do everything.

      We've got far more resources than we think we do- scarcity of resources is an artificial imposition of having private ownership. Take away the private ownership and there is plenty for all.

      Thus one must consider what is a wise use of money and what is not. Eliminating malaria would use up a chunk of money, but it'd save more lives (certainly) for less money (probably) than creating a tsunami centre.

      And since money is an artificial contruct to begin with and is totally mythological, all one needs do is revalue the currency and then one has enough for both.

      It's a question of return on investment: how much can we improve how many people's lives, and how much does it cost?

      Ah yes, the good old Return On Investment lie- if one actually has MORAL priorities that are greater than FINANCIAL priorities, ROI becomes just another excuse to be immoral.

      Money just tracks resources, and the decisions one makes on how those resources are allocated have very real effects on people's lives.

      Money hasn't tracked resources since the decision was made to delink the gold supply from money- and even before that it had major problems tracking resources. We've got computers now- why not track resources with the actual resources?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  7. IT for donation collection by Inigo+Soto · · Score: 1, Informative

    The three French cell phone operators have joined forces to facilitate the collection of funds via SMS (in French). An interesting initiative as well

    1. Re:IT for donation collection by The+Hobo · · Score: 1

      I, being a French-Canadian, don't see how this is flamebait. Shame on the mods. The article describes exactly what the parent said, babelfish and try to decipher it if you want. You may not understand what it says, but save the flamebait stick for actual flamebait. Also check the parent's past comments, they are fairly highly moderated.

      A slightly irked Slashdotter

      --
      There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    2. Re:IT for donation collection by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

      So has Cingular.

  8. Ham by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Informative
    > Beyond using IT to coordinate post-disaster relief efforts,

    Ham Radio.

    Google for your country's equivalent to the ARRL.

    Hams were the only functional communication for many people after the Loma Prieta quake hit California. Hams ran the only functioning communications network on 9/11. And yes, hams were there for the tsunami victims too.

    If you need a technology that'll enable coordination of disaster relief -- or even just help out by offloading a few million "Yes, Mom, I'm OK, and I'll talk to you when I can" messages from overloaded communications channels, chances are you're going to be using ham radio.

    Better yet -- become a ham yourself. In most countries, it's cheap and easy. And if you're reading this, you're already geeky enough that it'll be a hell of a lot of fun no matter where you live.

    Another poster on this thread was talking about SMS. When you have no cellular towers, you're not going to get even 20 seconds a day of uptime.

    And that's when you'll be helped by a ham.

    1. Re:Ham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck I hate hams.

    2. Re:Ham by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      This is definitely cool. I'm actually looking into this for packet radio. Apparently you can actually hook up your computer to your radio and talk to other computers similarly connected...not necessarily FAST, but if you need to move data around in a crisis situation and all other communication links have failed, this would definitely do it. I've had e-mail sent via ham radio before, and I'm interested if someone can point me to the current state of the art here.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    3. Re:Ham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, I hate idiots.

    4. Re:Ham by QuickFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      > > Beyond using IT to coordinate post-disaster relief efforts,

      > Ham Radio.


      Sorry, no, that won't work. In large parts of the tsunami region, ham is taboo. They're Moslems.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    5. Re:Ham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was not ready for that. You owe me a new receiver, which unfortunately for you, costs way the hell more than this keyboard. :)

    6. Re:Ham by kc8apf · · Score: 3, Informative

      TAPR(http://www.tapr.org/) is the usually the best source of packet radio information. They do lots of experimentation and collection of information.

      --
      kc8apf
    7. Re:Ham by zymano · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ham = radio. Big deal.

      It's old and not good enough anymore.

      Make Wifi inexpensive and have it connect to the net.

    8. Re:Ham by tylernt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It's old and not good enough anymore."

      Not good enough to make contact with someone on the other side of the *planet* with a radio made of 1930s technology and 40 feet of wire? One of the advantages of ham is that it's simple. You could probably disassemble a random TV or VCR to make a transmitter, hook it up to your home's aluminum rain gutters and a car battery, and contact someone thousands of miles away (i.e., someone outside of the disaster area that can send help). Just try that with Wifi, where you're lucky to get a signal a miles or two direct line-of-sight (no trees or buildings) with custom-built high-gain antennas that are not likely to exist after a disaster -- and who's going to be on the other end with another high-gain antenna to make the link? Nobody.

      "and have it connect to the net."

      Dude, the 'net is going to be *inoperative* in your area after a disaster.

      Ham radio may seem like stone age technology in the face of WiFi and gigabit routers, but that's not what it's for. It's for reliable long distance slow-speed communication, not short range high-speed communications.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    9. Re:Ham by kb5whv · · Score: 1

      Ham radio, TCP/IP, WiFi, etc. are all connected. One little bit of information. WiFi equipment operating in the 2.4GHz band is actually operating as FCC Part15 devices in a Ham radio band. Thus Hams can make modifications to the WiFi equipment and opperate at higher power, etc. That alone gives the Hams an edge when it comes to the WiFi argument. A bit more information is located here:

      http://www.youthtech.com/hamradio/tcp-ip.htm

  9. Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If anyone wants to see any videos, there's a load on www.asiantsunamivideos.com.

    If you want to help mirror, please pop along to this thread:

    http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=& th readid=359270

    and PM the thredstarter for info on how to get your mirror online.

    Currently there's ~15x100mbps boxes and an unmetered gigabit box mirroring the content, and we're still struggling.

    Any coders who could help modify the main script would also be welcome, as the central server is suffering under the load and it's a Dual Xeon / 4gb RAM.

    Thanks for any help any of you can bring :)

  10. Re:Who Cares? by CsiDano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disagree, much of the worlds population lives on coastal areas or inland but below or slightly above sea level. Nearly every country with a coastal border can be affected. LA, San Diego on the west coast of the US would suffer enormous casulties, for those in canada, Vancouver & Victoria. The east coast is just as bad. These are only two major cities in each country. Aside from human casulties think what this kind of event could do to your countries economy. All that aside, the tsunami was a result of an earth quake, which as we know can affect nearly every inland place in the world that is near a fault line.

    --
    piss off
  11. Don't forget privacy by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IT and communications are important to the rescue and recovery effort, but privacy is just as important. There have been reports of missing Swedes having their homes burglarized and the families of missing people being contacted by scammers. It's sick how these criminals would take advantage of other people's misery.

  12. Just make sure ... by mikael · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... when you lease multiple outside lines for redundancy, that the carriers actually do use separate paths all the way through, and don't go through a single point any way along the line.

    I once worked for a company who had multiple fiber-optic links for their WAN. For redundancy, we had two ISDN links to a remote site. Unfortunately, both links went down because they were both piggy-backed over 'virtual ISDN circuits' on a fibre-optic cable which happened to
    run over a bridge.

    Due to a flash floods the bridge collapsed, along with both ISDN circuits.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Just make sure ... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Where I once worked we had to manage some phone lines to call centre in the Highlands of Scotland somewhere so for 'redundancy' we bought lines off both BT and C&W.

      We looked at the exact setup and found that BT had just two lines to this place and C&W just used one of those BT lines for it's services and pointed this out to the people running the show. Unfortunately they didn't really seem to understand and kept saying "But if BT breaks down then we still have C&W" - "Not if is the BT line which C&W use which breaks we don't, you fools".

    2. Re:Just make sure ... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Where I once worked we had to manage some phone lines to call centre in the Highlands of Scotland somewhere so for 'redundancy' we bought lines off both BT and C&W.

      Strangely enough, the bridge mentioned was the rail bridge that ran over the River Ness to Inverness, and was washed away on the 7th February 1989 - all the fibre optic cabling to Inverness ran over the one bridge. I happened to be in the Network Management Centre at the time, and saw both links go down simultaneously. Despite demands from management to fix this problem immediately, there wasn't much anyone could do, unless someone could provide us with a spare diving suit and oxygen tank, and an emergency underwater fibre optic repair kit.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  13. Re:Who Cares? by mboverload · · Score: 0

    The US economy would fall flat, millions would be out of jobs. Welcome to The Depression 2.

  14. Re:Videos - Not a Troll?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This comment isn't a troll, it's a request for help!

    Slightly off-topic from the discussion I agree, nonetheless it is actually a request for help!

    Jesus guys!

  15. Interesting... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My first thought was: Maybe this disaster was needed to update disaster recovery around other areas of the world. But then I realized something: It's rather that mankind is shortsighted when dealing with new technologies, disasters (and everything else).

    Like, while the media and biz ppl were focused on porn sites, businesses, etc, the less favored countries couldn't get a chance to use this technology in their favor.

    Ironically, the internet was originally designed as a disaster-proof (specifically, nuke-proof) network.

  16. IT is not the answer to this problem by teneighty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't question the generosity of spirit behind this kind of effort, but lets focus on the reality here: many of the worst hit areas barely even have telephones, let alone IT infrastructure.

    What they really need is: Good government, education, sanitation and medical expertise, communication infrastructure and civil engineers - roughly in that order. Even with early warning systems, Aceh would have still been completely devasted - the water went roughly 9 MILES inland in some places. In any case, Sumatra was hit within minutes of the quake. Granted, Sri Lanka, India and Thialand would have benefited greatly from an early warning system (as illustrated by one family had one of their own - a 10 year old girl who paid attention to her geography lessons - story here)

    1. Re:IT is not the answer to this problem by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Maybe this is a good application for above-the-weather blimps that provide communication services.

      But as you say, there are a lot of other basic issues to be solved in those parts as well.

      Besides that, an evacuation alert might just cause more loss of life due to panic than the impending disaster - not to mention the inevitable hoaxes that might occur.

  17. What if... by AndreyF · · Score: 1

    ...but what if everyone that has a cell phone had a Ham radio? What would that be like in the middle of a disaster? I don't see it working out too well...

    1. Re:What if... by kc8apf · · Score: 1

      1) Ham radio requires a test to get a license. It involves some electronics theory. Not everyone who has a cell phone would get a license.

      2) Ham radio doesn't use central points for access (e.g. cell towers) so many users just means find a "free" frequency is more difficult. Emergency traffic gets priority anyway and emergency co-ordination is higher priority than health and wellbeing traffic ("I'm OK").

      --
      kc8apf
    2. Re:What if... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      ...but what if everyone that has a cell phone had a Ham radio? What would that be like in the middle of a disaster? I don't see it working out too well...

      You do need to know more about Ham radio. Even if we put down license requirements for Amateur Radio, The number of avaialble bands and frequencies a Ham can use means that even in the most congested times after an emergency there is plenty of bandwidth to go around. If you add the fact that knowledge is required to be a ham and you do need a license means that Ham Radio operators know what they are supposed to do when and where in respect to sharing frequencies, band plans, priority emergency traffic and the like.

  18. Old "MSM" Media twists disaster coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    We all suspect that the BBC carries a heavy anti-American bias, and nowhere has this become more apparent than in the BBC coverage of the tsumnami disaster. The following excerpt from the Telegraph gives the scoop:
    'Don't Mention the Navy' is the BBC's Line

    Last week we were subjected to one of the most extraordinary examples of one-sided news management of modern times, as most of our media, led by the BBC, studiously ignored what was by far the most effective and dramatic response to Asia's tsunami disaster. A mighty task force of more than 20 US Navy ships, led by a vast nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Abraham Lincoln, and equipped with nearly 90 helicopters, landing craft and hovercraft, were carrying out a round-the-clock relief operation, providing food, water and medical supplies to hundreds of thousands of survivors.

    The BBC went out of its way not to report this. Only when one BBC reporter, Ben Brown, hitched a lift from one of the Abraham Lincoln's Sea Hawk helicopters to report from the Sumatran coast was there the faintest hint of the part that the Americans, aided by the Australian navy, were playing.

    Instead the BBC's coverage was dominated by the self-important vapourings of a stream of politicians, led by the UN's Kofi Annan; the EU's "three-minute silence"; the public's amazing response to fund-raising appeals; and a Unicef-inspired scare story about orphaned children being targeted by sex traffickers. The overall effect was to turn the whole drama into a heart-tugging soap opera.

    The real story of the week should thus have been the startling contrast between the impotence of the international organisations, the UN and the EU, and the remarkable efficiency of the US and Australian military on the ground. Here and there, news organisations have tried to report this, such as the Frankfurter Allgemeine in Germany, and even the China News Agency, not to mention various weblogs, such as the wonderfully outspoken Diplomad, run undercover by members of the US State Department, and our own www.eureferendum.blogspot.com. But when even Communist China's news agency tells us more about what is really going on than the BBC, we see just how strange the world has become.

    One real lesson of this disaster, as of others before, is that all the international aid in the world is worthless unless one has the hardware and organisational know-how to deliver it. That is what the US and Australia have been showing, as the UN and the EU are powerless to do. But because, to the BBC, it is a case of "UN and EU good, US and military bad", the story is suppressed. The BBC's performance has become a national scandal.

  19. Open Tsunami Alert System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inspired by Bob Cringely's recent column (http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20041230 .html).

    OTAS
    http://otasblog.blogspot.com/

    1. Re:Open Tsunami Alert System by AngryElmo · · Score: 1

      Interesting, although it fails to mention how exactly alerts would be delivered. It would need to go to a few more people than those who just happened to be running an agent on there PC/Mac whatever and happened to notice it.

  20. Would be better if we by zymano · · Score: 1

    Would be better if we if we had a high-speed wireless network using WiFi phones . An alternative to cellphones is needed. We could construct one if we could contsruct cheap broadcast towers . I am not sure on distance of WiFi though .

    1. Re:Would be better if we by tylernt · · Score: 1

      The problem with WiFi is that it's short range. To get coverage, you have to link many sites together. In a disaster, many of your sites go dead and suddenly you have holes in your routing infrastructure and you lose end-to-end connectivity. A long-range technology that can communicate to a disaster area, while itself being located outside of the disaster area, would probably be more effective.

      In fact, cellphones have longer range than WiFi. That makes cellphones better and WiFi worse in a disaster situation.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:Would be better if we by zymano · · Score: 1

      WiFi can be longer range . Look up Mesh WiFi.

      A temporary WiFi like Cell tower could be very portable and doesn't have to be stationary but could be on a van.

      Ham , wifi and Cellphone are all just radio waves and all have different strengths but in my opinion the one that uses the airwaves most efficiently and can be setup fast and repaired quickly is probably WiFi.

    3. Re:Would be better if we by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problem is that cellphones and WiFi rely on infrastructure (WiFi base stations, cellphone towers). In a disaster situation, you can't assume the infrastructure is still functional. A cell tower isn't worth much if it is no longer connected to the rest of the telephone network.

      So, for disaster communication we need something that can reach far enough on its own, without needing any infrastructure.

      If some communication infrastructure survives the disaster, it's nice if the disaster communication method can use it; however, it must be able to work well enough without it.

  21. Communication by msgregory@earthlink. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not the internet that's important, it's communication. My question is, is all this mass communication helping us as a race or conditioning us to get our answers from outside ourselves, making us so dependent on it that we can no longer think for ourselves? Am I the only one who has noticed the decline in the quality of modern writing in contrast to the writings of, say, the 19th century?

  22. What if...Shortwave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " ...but what if everyone that has a cell phone had a Ham radio? What would that be like in the middle of a disaster? I don't see it working out too well..."

    Let me guess. You've never heard of shortwave radios? They're quite common, here and abroad.

  23. agreed, by Brigadier · · Score: 3, Informative


    My dad was into ham radios (jamaica) for a while and during hurricanes, and power outages he was still talking to people around the world. It's simple, and redundant (runs on a car battery) and most important it's proven. I'm sorry but the internet should never be relied upon for communications during a disaster it's just not reliable. It is also dependent on too many things. Electricity, phone lines, networks.

  24. IT is not the answer to this problem-Hammer, nail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't question the generosity of spirit behind this kind of effort, but lets focus on the reality here: many of the worst hit areas barely even have telephones, let alone IT infrastructure."

    You've heard the saying "When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"? Well that's why IT is being mentioned. IT is at best, an "after the fact" type of thing. Welcome to the "IT" section.

  25. The old quote still holds... by djupedal · · Score: 3, Informative

    The internet views a block as an outage and routes around it.

    While working in Tokyo when the 'LGQ' (7.8) hit in the South, the only way people could get messages out was by the 'net - this was in the mid-90's.

  26. Warning systems are useful... by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but nowhere near as useful as educating people.

    For example, in the Indonesian city of Banda Aceh, the earthquake that triggered the tsunami on December 26 just about flattened everything. Now, many people who live by the sea in earthquake-prone areas know that large eathquakes can trigger tsunami, so it's prudent to head for higher ground, warning or not. However, in Banda Aceh, that didn't occur to anybody, and when the tsunami hit, everybody was in town, cleaning up after the quake.

    So just explaining to people along the coast that they should head for higher ground after any major quake would save a lot more lives than a warning system.

    (Interestingly, the sea gypsies in the region suffered few casualties from the tsunami, because they knew from their folklore that when the sea suddenly receded a long way, it was going to come back, and fast. So at the first sign of the approaching tsunami, they headed for the hills.)

    1. Re:Warning systems are useful... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I saw a couple of videos on the news here that just serve to underline your point.

      One video was done by a German guy who was at the beach with his family (in Thailand, I think). The kid is splashing in the water, etc. All of a sudden, the water's gone, pulled back out to sea. The guy with the camera is amazed, and is talking about how fast the water went out, etc. He's actually walking around on the newly-uncovered beach talking about how interesting this phenomenon is. At this point, I was sorely tempted to scream at the TV, "Get to higher ground now, you idiot!" Of course it was just a bit too late. I assume that since his video survived, so did he and his family, but holy crap.

      The other video was even worse. It was done by some British-sounding guy (I'm American, so that means he could actually be South African, Australian, you name it) from the second or third floor of some house near the beach. He's filming the wave with his children. He says, "Wow, that wave must be 15-20 feet high, easy." He and his kids ooh and aah as it completely flattens the buildings closer to the beach. And then, surprise! The wave reaches the house that he is in, and he finally realizes that he's in imminent danger and he gets the kids inside to shelter.

      One of the good things about this disaster (thin silver lining on a really big, dark cloud, I know) is that everybody in the world now knows that when the sea goes out, run away! If another tsunami happens within the next two or three generations, everybody should be much better prepared.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  27. Double your donation; free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Double the amount you donate to the Tsunami relief fund; for free!

    Anything you donate through the link at http://www.salesforce.com/ will be 100% matched (up to $250,000).

    Give now:)

  28. There is no substitute for being there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Strong local men who care and are willing to use their muscle to deliver the goods, clear the way. Talk about the merits of email in this endeavour are just silly.

    1. Re:There is no substitute for being there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With my blogging power, I can save the world!

      Blog on good citizens,

      Blogman.

  29. mod parent up; informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up; informative

  30. Re:Old "MSM" Media twists disaster coverage by mspohr · · Score: 1
    I guess I really shouldn't respond to your troll but I do feel that this is a blatant mis-representation of the facts that you could have verified quickly. I just went to the BBC web site and searched for "tsunami us navy" and came up with a list of 68 stories which mention US military contributions to the relief effort such as this:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4145 259.stm

    /Mark

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  31. Would be better if we-Tech Breaks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Warning system blighted by bad equipment and poor communications
    01/01/2005 - 10:24:15

    Faulty equipment, poor communications and cumbersome bureaucracy were blamed today for the failure of nations around the Indian Ocean's rim to warn of one of the world's most devastating natural disasters.

    A sensor system in Indonesia that could have warned of Sunday's huge waves was not working because it had been hit by lightning. In India, bureaucrats faxed a warning of possible disaster to the wrong official. A Thai meteorologist acting on a hunch sent an alert to radio stations, but it does not appear the warning was widely relayed.

    Even if the Indian Ocean had an international tsunami alert system, like one in the Pacific, the warning probably would have come too late for the people of Sumatra, the Indonesian island closest to the epicentre of the 9.0-magnitude earthquake that set off the killer waves.

    Indonesian officials said they had a basic sensor system to gauge the possibility of a tsunami hitting the nation's main island of Java - but it was knocked out by a lighting strike two weeks before the disaster.

    Yet, even if had been working, Indonesian officials acknowledge they have no way to alert villages.

    "Even if we did know about the tsunami, how can we (disseminate) information?" said Prih Harjadi of the Indonesian Meteorological & Geophysical Agency.

    Media reports of the tsunami also failed to prompt any alerts from the agency, he said. "We didn't call anyone because we didn't know who to call."

    Most residents and foreign tourists in southern Thailand's resort region were caught unawares.

    "There was no warning from the meteorological department or any other agencies," said Phuket governor Udomsak Asawarangkul.

    An alert of some kind got through to some places - at a few beaches officials yelled through bull horns telling tourists to get off the beaches. Most people got no warning.

    "The (first) warning was that the ocean went out and people were walking down the beach wondering why there were fish flapping on the sand," said Steve Hall, an Australian who moved to Thailand a decade ago. "By the time they realised, it was too late."

    Kathawudhi Marlairojanasiri, a meteorological department weather forecast chief on duty on Sunday, said the office sent warnings to radio and television stations an hour before the first waves hit - on a hunch the quake off Sumatra might trigger tsunami waves.

    Thai authorities apparently did not relay it, in fear of scaring tourists with a possible false alarm.

    "Five years ago, the meteorological department issued a warning of possible tidal wave after an earthquake happened in Papua New Guinea but the tourism authority complained that such a warning, if it turned out to be false, would hurt tourism," said Sulamee Prachuab, director of the meteorological department's seismological Bureau.

    "There was a 7.6-magnitude earthquake occurred in the same location in Sumatra five years ago but there was no tsunami," she added.

    The first word Indians got of the tsunami was on the news after the water roared ashore, even though waves swamped India's Andaman and Nicobar islands north of Sumatra an hour before they reached the southern coast of the Indian mainland.

    Officials in southern India who had received a report from a military base on a Nicobar island mistakenly faxed the news to the home of the government's former science and technology minister, rather than his successor.

    "It looks like they forgot to update their records," said Ashok Kavdia, an aide of the former minister.

    Sri Lanka's president said on Thursday that the leaders of a seven-member group of South Asian countries planned to discuss installing a disaster early warning system at a summit on January 9.

    The 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations will discuss the idea next week.

    But even a hi-tech warning system might not help India, a political analyst said.

  32. This is marked troll? by pclminion · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Maybe it's offtopic. MAYBE. But troll?

    It's pretty easy to understand, really. The moderator read a comment pointing out where people could see tsunami videos. He/she thought this to be in poor taste, or was disgusted by it, and thus marked the comment Troll.

    What disturbs me is that people think that watching video of the tsunami is somehow unethical. Are we supposed to shield ourselves from reality? Come on. As far as I'm concerned, it is the duty of every person who can stomache it to look once, just once, at the videos of what happened. It's your responsibility as part of the human race to see and get a small taste of the horror, not to sit in your armchair and sigh "Oh, too bad all those people died," as if the rest of the world was just some quaint figment of your imagination.

    There's a difference between doing that and playing the footage repeatedly and laughing about it. A big difference.

  33. What about location & identification of people by nfarrell · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else thought about how hard it must be to look for someone after a disaster such as this? There are many blogs and other sites where people have posted messages, but AFAIK no attempt has been made to centralise and co-ordinate this.

    I can see one very good value-for-money project being to establish a universal people registry, using various characteristics (location, physical features, photo, DNA, itinery, etc.). There are lots of extensions to this people could think up, but the most important thing is to centralise it. I can only imagine the anguish, expense, and inconveniencing of others that goes on as people go from one hospital to another, one website to another, posting so much that no-one will see even a fraction of it all.

    Yes there are privacy issues which tend to get lost in this confusion, but if the database is run by a reputable organisation (UN?) this may not be so much of an issue.

  34. Without communication-Rich people cause Disasters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Providing for the common welfare is often far more expensive than the greedy misers known as the rich would be willing to pay for. "

    You do realize that the cry mentioned will come from not just the rich. Also it's not just the rich that complains about cost.

    I know you all around here hate people with money, but try to keep some perspective.

  35. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    isn't it Ironic that the IT world can do nothing more than create a "virtual conference" from "bloggers", neither of which most of the tsunami victims would ever know about, even before the disaster?

  36. Another question by adeydas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A bit offtopic but I would like to ask this question to fellow /. readers anyway. Technology no doubt has helped in the relief efforts but had technology really helped in preventing parts of the disaster. For instance, more lives could have been saved if the people in the coastal villages would have heard the warning issued by the government. Unfortnately, these poor people didn't have the money to buy a radio or TV. So isn't it economical reforms that should come first?!

    1. Re:Another question by Cookeisparanoid · · Score: 1

      The thing about economic development is it creates competition with the west you only need to see the number of post bashing offshoring to India to see the major barriers to economic reform.

  37. Re:Without communication-Rich people cause Disaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, look at his username: MarxistHacker42 - you are dealing with the worst kind of liberal. Marxist - don't even bother with figuring that extreme liberal cult out, they are so conflicted that most of them have their own sub cults, some with as few members as 1 or 2; calls himeself a hacker - surely he thinks he knows more than anyone; and 42 - sums up liberals nicely, especially the extremists: there is a perfect answer to every question and problem with the world. It is only a matter of implementing the answer despite cost or a little thing some people like to call "reality".

    Don't argue with him, you can't win.

  38. Great idea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    See, for the tsunami early warning system thing, we should just put a link up on the main page here.

    WE CAN /. THE TSUNAMI!

    That'll teach the bugger!

  39. Re:Old "MSM" Media twists disaster coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EU is no more an "international organization" than what the USA is...

  40. UN World Conference on Disaster Reduction by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    I thought that had something to do with Bush and Iraq...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  41. Re:IT is not the answer to this problem-Hammer, na by andriw · · Score: 1

    Heh? Here in Indonesia, a group of IT volunteers has succesfully set up a wireless LAN to provide Internet Access although at first they had to deal with unsupportive government officials and lack of hardware support (eventually they flew to Aceh using Australian's Hercules plane). They also build a website to serve updated news and list of victims here : www acehmediacenter or id. They started in Dec 31, and right now there are about three WLAN nodes up and running in Aceh. Thank to these guys, many people can find way to search on their relatives, to know current situation in Aceh regarding relief efforts. Volunteers and Journalists can also use this to send important info on Aceh.

  42. Re:Who Cares? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Inland big cities/ports on the Great Lakes would survive. Toronto, Montreal, Chicago, Detroit, etc. (although Montreal might be hardest hit due to the narrowing of the river leading up to the island). If there wasn't a novel written about this possibility already there are certainly a few in the works now.

    Earthquakes and other natural disasters in that area of North America are relatively unknown if you discount violent snow and icestorms, but the locals know how to deal with these regular problems.

  43. Geospatial images from natural disasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DigitalGlobe has a amazing gallery of tsunami images, including several PDF analyses with before and after images of Meulaboh, Gleebruk, Banda Aceh and Sri Lanka.

  44. WiFi Airship Hubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They seem to be immune to most quake-related disasters. These could be dispatched where communication lines are down, and even in non-disaster areas they could be used as competition to the cable and phone lines.

    1. Re:WiFi Airship Hubs by tylernt · · Score: 1

      A constellation of LEO (Low Earth Orbit) satellites would be operational all the time, there wouldn't be a lag time between disaster and deployment.

      Like say, Inmarsat or Iridium. :)

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  45. Re:Old "MSM" Media twists disaster coverage by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

    You posted this in the BBC story comments earlier today. Nobody cared the first time, either.

  46. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    fuh.

    I live in Vancouver so everytime something like this happens, the paper goes into a huge panic. The fact is that places like Port Alberni, Uclulet and Port Hardy would get hammered. Vancouver and Victoria are both very sheltered and would likely experience a 1-3m wave (similar to a ferry's wake). In addition, the BC coastline is relatively steep which greatly mitigates any potential damage both by keeping the wave from rising and by preventing it from getting very far inshore. We have a lot more to fear from a warm rain in March than almost any tsunami.

  47. Intelsat by permanentE · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd plug my company.

    I work for Intelsat, a satellite communications provider. They are providing free satellite service to the UN for establishing field offices.

    --
    What was the last law that benefited people but not corporations?
  48. Re:What about location & identification of peo by itsthebin · · Score: 1

    thaivisa.com had a forum ( http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php?showforum= 57 )up and running very quickly which allowed people to post pictures and names of people who they could not contact and forum members in the area were able to attempt to help them. Also links to sites with data on injured or dead people set up by the government were posted as they came up. This has created a good resource for people searching for information on relatives or friends.

    --
    ...I obey the laws of physics....
  49. Connecting families by Midnight+Warrior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In every distaster, be it a natural disaster like this one, or refuge camps from civil war, the NGOs which run the aid efforts must use some sort of software. The classic problem appears to be connecting families. If I were a relief worker (and I've never been one), I think the best software would provide:

    • Short video clip saying their name, village name, and names of parents and children (if any).
    • Local dialects spoken, unicode records of their names (I imagine most refuges are illiterate and workers must guess at their names), and any relatives whose names they can spell.
    • Also, GIS coordinates of their original home, if available, would be helpful. This really could be as simple as finding a village name and recording that, or if they gave you an address in a city.
    • Still frame, mug shot that facial recognition software could compare against photos provided by family members, if they become available. (hint: use facial recognition where false alarms don't get people arrested, but rather are welcomed)
    • Some sort of indexing system that could operate over low bandwidth, like what might be available over HAM radio. Treat the file on a refugee like a BitTorrent link and as one person at another site gets the records from other sites, cached copies start appearing around the mesh of camps speeding up the search process as time drags on.
    • Except for the video capture, don't have extensive hardware and software requirements (read high cost per terminal)
    • Give each person an RFID bracelet so that refuge workers can find people quickly. If the camp gets raided, people can tear off their bracelets, or if they get relocated, they just need to check in and their demographics are copied to the local camp.
    • Let a relative looking for the lost open a case and now it becomes a question of data mining and the application of existing tools.
    • Relatives looking for lost people could indicate the approximate location, the language the person(s) speak, and letter sequences known to be in the person's name]
    • People who lived there that could effectively communicate with aid workers could assist in correctly spelling names and addresses, making the need for translations to occur only once.

    Okay. I know I'm dreaming, but all this stuff can be done with real databases that support blobs, and torrent links aren't that hard to index. Drop facial recognition into a central facility (say the NGO headquarters) and they can issue recommendations for people to hook up. Heck, make it a Knoppix-like live-CD where the local HD is for cache and data acquisition, and building a reliable workstation is a piece of cake - distribute CDs and replace broken hardware quickly and efficiently.

    Have any NGOs really looked into starting open-source projects to do these kinds of things or do they already have adequate tools of their own? Anybody have any insight? (they're all probably in the Pacific right now)

    I say open-source because NGOs are not in competition for anything except money, and sometimes not even then. Given a uniform software base, they could work together and participate much more uniformly and thus speed the disaster relief efforts all that much more. Add the cost of running open-source and the myriad of commercial vendors looking for a piece of the action (not all will be as generous as ESRI is for now) will be numerous. Open source is the only way to keep the cost down, and the NGO could still pay someone to develop this software, but agree to keep the work in the open.

  50. 1 - 3 m wave.... by KMSelf · · Score: 1

    One thing I gained an appreciation from the Tsunami coverage and videos.

    It's only partially about the wave height. I understand now why the term "tidal wave" came into being: the wave is like a fast-moving tide. A wind- or wake-generated wave of 1-3 meters is one thing. A tsunami / tidal surge sustained over several minutes is going to do a world of hurt for low-lying districts, and a lot of coastal areas are only marginally above sea level.

    Several videos clearly show a sea that's less crashing into the shore than spilling over its banks, and continuing to do so for several minutes. Even though the water is only a meter or so over mean land elevation, the damage it does is considerable.

    Sure, it's not flattened buildings and people sucked out to sea. But it is floaded basements, ground floors, electrical systems, utility conduits, septic systems, and the like. That's still pretty disruptive.

    --

    What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?

  51. The Wonders of Mobile Phones by bananahammock · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not exactly new media or the Internet, however a friend of mine was in Phuket when the waves hit - fortunately he was located in a bungalow perched on a hill and witnessed the event unfold.

    Remembering a couple of his friends were in Krabbe, a little more to the east, he called them on their mobile. They fortunately answered and he warned them about some serious waves heading their direction. This gave his mates a few extra seconds to get their shit together before the connection was broken. They did survive although many around them did not.

    We'll never know, however those couple of seconds just to jolt them into action (how many people simply stood and stared in bewilderment) may have been what saved their life.

  52. Ham like systems for IP by tallbill · · Score: 1

    I am sure that an analog system can be used to piggy back a digital signal with a point to point protocol in the Physical layer so that a HAM connection can act just like a modem and a phone line.

    The HAM radio protocols do not exclude the use of HAM as the transport mechanism for an IP connection.

    And thus you could get a UDP or a TCP/IP connection through a HAM radio setup (perhaps on special frequencies). Thus HAM and Internet are not mutually exclusive. /. posters: Doesn't this system already exisit?

  53. same thing happens to funeral goers by tallbill · · Score: 1

    Privacy is important in any case.
    I have known for years that criminal fish the obituaries and then rob houses of people while they are at a funeral.

  54. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True. Even a previous Slashdot poll showed that almost 50% of the voters live at 0-100m altitude. Most of them close to sea, I reckon.

  55. Try and answer the question yourself by tallbill · · Score: 1

    Maybe the quality of writing that you see from 100 years ago is so good because a lot of the poor writing from that time was just thrown in the trash or used to heat people's houses.

    I am sure that you can find a lot of poor writing form 100 or 150 years ago if you go to an old archieve.

    Probably what you are complaigning about is information overload. You might want to subscribe to a literary journal where someone else reviews the works. That way you can see what might be good. How about the New York Review of Books?

    If you read the random comments that folks type furiously and almost automatically at two AM into their computer because they are bored and unemployed, then you probably have a good reason to be frustrated.

    I think that there are those who do not think for themselves. And there are those who do. In the 19th century anything that didn't pass the editor didn't get printed. No all I have to do is hit Submit and, poof, I am published.

    If you want quality subscribe to a magazine. That way, once a week or once a month, you can get journals in a paper format where the writings have been reviewed by a professional editor.

  56. I agree by zogger · · Score: 1

    I agree, for the cost of a single military jet fighter, they could have provided thousands of "civil alert" radios and made sure each little coastal village and hamlet all got one. pre tuned to an emergency freq, automatically activated like the weather alert radios are. And it should be a transceiver, as there are now multiple reports of all the animals "sensing" the coming tsunami and heading to high ground, etc. This shouldn't be ignored, as a lot of these poorer people are basically agrarians and have grown up watching animals, are around their animals all the time or are observing the wild animals, and note their behavior. It's another form of little understood but effective "sensing" that could be reported back to a central location to act as backup to electronic sensors.

    You have to wonder about nations priorities sometimes.

    Here's an aside, speaking of military things. Imagine this huge wall of water coming not as a force of nature but as an actual "invasion". In this case,and in one sense, India got invaded directly across the beach over hundreds (thousands?) of miles of coastline and no one in the devastated areas knew this "invasion" was coming. Sort of makes satellites and supercomputers and so called "intelligence" agencies and whatnot seem pretty stupid when you think about it in those terms, great tech gone to waste, when it really could have been used to actually help alleviate this "invasion". Just like in the US, we allegedly have "homeland security" now-a decent concept actually, but in it's application we still get who knows how many drug smuggling planes crossing over daily, and the millions who cross the border by foot yearly, and none of our "high tech" seems to be able to help with that "security". Makes ya wonder sometimes who's driving the bus and how the heck did he get a license?

    1. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots. There were probably radios and TVs in at least a few houses in each of the villages. come off your starving masses horse.

    2. Re:I agree by adeydas · · Score: 1

      Get real, if there were, the people have got to be seriously retarded not to flee their homes in the wake of such a call. Go and watch NDTV 24x7 and then blab.

  57. reply by zymano · · Score: 1

    Directional WiFi is not just a few miles. During the 9-11 terrorist attacks cellphones still worked. And there was an article on slash about new emergency temoporary cell phone towers. Trying to use HAM may work for a just a few but would be mess if you had to deal with massive numbers of people. So if we could establish satellite ,long distance mesh Wifi,a nd cellphone like wifi then that would be more useful in my opinion. Ham is good for limited use but not for the real world anymore. It's radio and radio will be disappearing in the near future too.

    1. Re:reply by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "It's radio and radio will be disappearing in the near future too."

      Uh... you do know that cell phones and WiFi are both radios, right?

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:reply by zymano · · Score: 1

      My mistake. I meant radio broadcasting is going to go wifi someday. A wireless network .

    3. Re:reply by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      My mistake. I meant radio broadcasting is going to go wifi someday. A wireless network .

      You do realize that Ham radio is not broadcasting... Or Amateur Radio is not commercial Broadcast Radio.

      Broadcasting: transmissions intended for reception by the general public, either direct or relayed; A one way communication from one source to many recipients.
      Transmitting: To send from one person, thing, or place to another; convey; To send (a signal), as by wire or radio.

      The rules governing broadcasting by Amateur Radio Operators do vary from country to country but here in the United States with regard to Amateur Radio broadcasting the FCC's regulations are very specific as the where when and why you can broadcast.

      As for Broadcasting to all go wifi one day, not going to happen... nope not if you quantify it with the word ALL. Some broadcasting will be done by wifi but not all... It is such a wonderful thing to have diversity. Just as we still have gossip, newspapers, radio, magazines and television; we will merely have yet another medium in which we communicate.

  58. Speaking of natural disasters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... how about the colour scheme here?

    Behold, relief is on the way!

  59. I AM Alive and other victim registration systems by Raindeer · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the largest problems I currently see is in the area of victim and missing registration. I wrote twice about it in my blog. I first made the following analysis: Like everybody I am following the news on the tsunami and I noticed a couple of things that got me thinking. After a disaster there are generally two major questions that need to be answered. 1. Who survived, got injured, died, is missing? 2. What relief is needed, where and who provides it?

    To answer the first question there are two systems that I found with a bit of googling: A Japanese group has build a system.
    Their presentation to ETSI can be found here. It has a great name: I Am Alive. This system seems to be currently in use by the Thai governement and Red Cross.

    The Australian governement has a system which is described here by the Red Cross which is using it. The system is called the National Registration and Inquiry System (NRIS).

    I have seen the results of the the I Am Alive-system and it looks like an
    excellent system. It would be great if they could get some global support to further develop this system. At this moment it seems only Japan is working on this system and a quick search on Google didn't point too many English language pages on the system. I'll see if I can find some information on it.

    I imagine every ministery of Interior, or government emergency response organisation should have a copy always ready and available on a webserver. So whenever there is a disaster this system is already running and can be used to register all the countries nationals potentially involved and can then later be used to compare these data with the records of the country affected. Maybe the United Nations Reliefweb website could be used as a basis.

    The United Nations Reliefweb is also a great resource on all kinds of relief efforts and it gives good information on what kind of resources and people are nescessary.

  60. Re:What about location & identification of peo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup.

    When I saw those front-end loaders just pushing stacks of people into the mass graves, my first thought was how valuable it would have been to have someone there a few hours before with an electronic camera, taking pictures of each body. Ideally a camera with LOTS of battery life, a GPS, and the ability to add voice annotation.

    Just a time/date/location stamped pic of each face would have had tremendous value (to loved ones, surviving estates, insurance carriers, etc) in the weeks and months afterwards.

  61. IT situation in Banda Aceh by cloudness+is+x · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I am writing this message from a terminal of the central posko (dispensary and supply post) of the Red Cross in Banda Aceh. As a volunteer here, I can tell you that communication through cellphones and satellite phones have been a real pain with satellite signals always going on and off, and voice quality being very bad. GSM phones sometimes fare better. I am here mainly because I couldn't get in touch by phone with my contacts from the Dept of Foreign Affaires, with whom I was first supposed to work with.

    Here in the posko the only reliable way to communicate is by the Internet. The IT guys here have set up a nice wired and wireless network which ease the communication with Jakarta, Geneva, and all our relatives. Important reports are going though and help the central coordination of the relief efforts. I am keeping a blog for the medical students of my university so that they learn at the same time the other side of disaster medical relief efforts and international 'humanitarian' organisations.

    1. Re:IT situation in Banda Aceh by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And obviously, this was needed earlier- far earlier. Southeast asia is the home of small electronics- yet there was NO way for survivors on Sumatra to call Thailand during that first two hours and say "Hey, we just had a Tsunami here- better evacuate your coast".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  62. That is a matter of education. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    As a survivor of 1985 earthquake in Mexico City (that officially killed "only" 6000, trustworthy accounts, of which the goverment of the day's was not one, put the figure in around 30000) I can tell you that you learn to trust the means available to you to prevent loss of human life.

    After the disaster in Mexico City it was implemented a seismic alert that gives you some valuable *seconds* (around a minute or there abouts) between the moment an earthquake happens (normally in the west coast of Mexico) and when it is felt.

    When we received alerts (many of them false) I rarely heard people whinning abuut it, in the contrary, I saw and experienced people doing ordered evacuations.

    Knowing about previous catastrophes concentrates your mind, which at the end is a matter of education.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  63. More research by Ludo.Sanders · · Score: 1
    "the IT infrastructure needed to make sure that people get advance warning before the next natural disaster strikes."
    At this point i dont think any system wil give an early enough warning. Unless I missed the invention of the time machine. The point is, that we still don't understand much of the ecological processes involved, in this kind of dissaster, too a degree that we can predict it. therefore no warning system, no matter how fast it is, will always be too late. It will save some lifes, but not enough.
    And lets face it, we are bringing this on ourselfs, with our over populated, and resource waisting world. earth wil restore the balance, with or without us.
    --
    "It is not because no one sees the truth that it becomes a mistake" (Mahatma Gandhi)
    1. Re:More research by ElaborateCalculator · · Score: 1
      It will save some lifes, but not enough.


      Who decides how many lives saved are enough for a system to be effective?

      I mean, if it saves 20 lives, it's useless, but if it saves more than that, we should install it?
      --
      --darren
    2. Re:More research by Ludo.Sanders · · Score: 1

      yeah sorry forgot the IMHO

      --
      "It is not because no one sees the truth that it becomes a mistake" (Mahatma Gandhi)
  64. Yeah sure. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Whatever AC, we are talking about The Daily Telegraph, the voice of the neo-conservatives light of the UK, whinning about the BBC (which has reported widely about US relief efforts as well as problems that have ensued in both Indonesia an Tamil controlled Sri Lanka).

    Quelle surprise.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  65. Sri Lanka answered, too! by AnuradhaRatnaweera · · Score: 1

    Several organizations of the Sri Lankan IT industry, along with the Lanka Software Foundation and Lanka Linux User Group have worked around the clock for the last couple of weeks to create a set of applications to manage the Tsunami recovery program (URL not given to avoid being slashdotted). We made them Free and Open Source from the beginning, and most of the code are already in SourceForge.

  66. Re:Who Cares? by CsiDano · · Score: 1

    I agree with most of what you say, but the last part about natural disasters being relatively unknown, especially in the past year. For instance my own town was hit by a flood this past summer, I live in Peterborough Ontario, though the devastation was nothing compared to the asian tsunami, you would have thought it was the end of the world around here. I'm not kidding when I say people are still crying about their losses around here and trying to collect money. Nobody died in the great peterborough floods, but you wouldn't know it the way people cried and are still crying, plus the city was paralised for nearly a week. Although now many people are starting to shut the remaining whiners up by pointing out just what it really mens to lose everything.

    --
    piss off
  67. Ham radio by Corson · · Score: 1
    The Asian tsunami in December has dramatically shown how much SMS, email and the web are now indispensible parts of disaster recovery.

    More importantly, it has shown how important ham radio is when and where disaster strikes. Indeed, in tsunami-affected areas, "modern" communication tools, such as telephone, cell phones, email and web failed to work when needed.

  68. Re:Old "MSM" Media twists disaster coverage by eoinmadden · · Score: 0

    I have to agree.
    Most of the time I'm a fan of the BBC, but I do believe in this case local news outlets (in Britan and Ireland) such as the BBC, ITV and RTE have made little acknowlegment of the huge, practical and immmediate effort made by the US Army.

  69. Re:Old "MSM" Media twists disaster coverage by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    That is blatantly not true. I was watching BBC News 24 for long periods following the Tsunami and there were constant reports about the US resorces being moved into the area, this included plenty of coverage of what those resources consisted of and how useful the helicopters would be to the relief effort.

    I don't know who Christopher Brooker ( the journalist ) is but I think he must have some axe to grind.

    Also I don't actually know anyone who thinks the BBC has any kind of Anti American bias.

  70. Still watching Faux, Are We? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That said, I'm surprised that the USN task force has been in the news SO much. With the aid given to Pakistan, India's bitter rival, it seems a bit much to sale into the Indian Sea with an armada.

    Sure, it might have been the only thing available, but come on... we pay Pakistan and we sail into the region, sending U.S. Marines in to hand out supplies? Come on... is this a hearts and minds campaign?

  71. Absolutely! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    Of course, the base stations would be a bit vulnerable, but they will be less numerous in a airship scenario and therefore it will be cheaper to make the telecom infrastructure virtually indestrutible from acts of God.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  72. 1989 Silicon Valley earthquake by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake telephone service went down but the InterNet stayed up for communication and exchange of seismic data. This quake was two orders of magnitude smaller and only killed fifty-some people, but was plenty scary to us caught in it.
    Fortunately Silicon Valley itself was in a seismic "dead spot" and its dangerous bay-fill soils did not collapse. Santa Cruz, right next to the hypocenter, experienced direct shaking damage. And parts of San Francisco and Oakland where at distances where the seismic surface waves peaked at the resonant frequency of structures (about one Hertz) and caused more damage.

  73. metamod notification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever marked this Flamebait, I just marked you Unfair.

  74. Re:Videos - Not a Troll?! by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I saw your comment and attempted to raise the parent's mod up a bit, but oddly enough accidentally choose "Overrated" sinking it further into the depths of Slash. Just ignore this comment. I'm using it to get rid of my unfortunate moderation.

    --
    Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
  75. centralization is bad, what about a search engine? by slew · · Score: 1

    The problem with centralization is that it inspires turf wars and stomps on innovation (I guess that is a political philosophical statement, but I find it's mostly true in my view of the world).

    That's what's so great about a search engine (e.g., pick your favorite like google), they crawl the web so you can find the nooks and crannies like the blogs that have the messages you are talking about. Why create something new and a new bureaucracy (which after this crisis is over will search out totally random and inefficient things to do to maintain its survival/existence) when we already have something that works?

  76. SMS early warning still a great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Muscle is not the only thing. Everyone has to use their brains too. So the SMS idea earlier is a great one.

    To flesh it out a little:

    Local media including cell phone providers and local radio & TV stations should be at the top of the list when NASA/ NOAA/ USGS have urgent warnings to broadcast.

  77. Hindsight & history for non-gypsies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always remembered a story from my [American, fourth grade] elementary school reading textbook. It talked about a tsunami in Japan, and mentioned how the water went out first as everyone scratched their heads wondering what was up. So when I hear about the sea going out so far, the first thing I think is "tsunami?", and I have little sympathy for people who don't see the danger. Maybe, I think, they have have stupidly forgotten those stories from their childhoods, or their textbooks didn't want to choose stories from Japan...

    On the other hand, to be fair:

    I have to remember a trip in the UK a few years back. I arrived at the harbor in Cardiff, and was puzzled to see a gentle valley of mud flats in front of me. No sign of the Atlantic ocean was anywhere in sight. I later learned that I was right not to be worried, because the Bristol Estuary has the world's second highest tidal range, around 50 ft [15m]! But the fact is, as a tourist looking at the bay for the first time, I did NOT know what was "out of the ordinary"; and yet the possibility of a tsunami did NOT occur to my cheerful little tourist mind. So I am a chump to claim that "tsunami" always comes to mind when it should.

    So I have to conclude now, that even having those tsunami stories in everyone's curriculum won't guarantee that many of us [even the most paranoid] will recognize a tsunami when it is coming. We all have our 20/20 hindsight, gypsies included.

  78. Re:Without communication-Rich people cause Disaste by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    You do realize that the cry mentioned will come from not just the rich.

    Only for a very strange definition of who is the rich. As long as the work and goods are there, the average consumer cares not one whit where they actually come from.

    Also it's not just the rich that complains about cost.

    Only because the right wing has brainwashed ordinary people to vote against their own physical and economic interests.

    I know you all around here hate people with money, but try to keep some perspective.

    No, we don't hate people with money- we hate people who steal money by profiting off of somebody else's work.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  79. I also metamodded the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flamebait moderation unfair...just so you know. Die unfair mods die.

  80. I was irked too.. by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    when I was metamodding this.

    Metamodded the flamebait moderation 'Unfair'.

    Taking down unfair Moderators one metamod at a time...

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam