January's Toast to Tech Evil
comforteagle writes "In this month's mocking toast To Evil! Danny O'Brien laments the holiday habit of trying to hide one's evilness from Father Christmas, but finds those evil tech companies can't help being who they are. 'I'm really hoping that in their next batch of cinema adverts, the MPAA addresses this, and shows a grumbling adware developer instead of a Hollywood set-painter. The piracy issue, it affects us all: the construction guy, the lighting guy. And me, the guy who installed all that crap on your mum's computer. And also an awful lot of Los Angeles-based cocaine dealers. Why doesn't anyone think of them?'"
this month's mocking toast To Evil! Danny O'Brien...
I understood that Conan O'Brien (not sure if it's spelled this way) had some fun about another Evil in Las Vegas last week...
Might be some family vendetta against evil.
Trolling using another account since 2005.
Santa uses spyware! I always knew using Windows was dangerous.
/me draws the curtains
And don't forget the motorcycle cop and the red indian. They were my favourites.
.
They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
at least they didn't kill him
Say what you will about drug dealers, they are about the most honest "professional" people I've ever met. you tell them what you want when you want it, and they tell you whether they can do it or not. None of this, "I gotta talk to ...x" or "Let me check with my vendor" crap.
I tell ya, they are a breath of fresh air to an IT manager-type.
Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
This thread doesn't have an icon. You need to get an "evil" icon for topics like these. Until then, just use the Microsoft or SCO icon.
I can just see MPAA's line of thinking - "Let's all conspire to change the dreaded '666' to a '999' in everyone's minds, just for a laugh..."
[Now, I'm off to lift my le... Um, visit... at another place.]
Overpeer is a company known to be paid by the MPAA and RIAA member companies to upload corrupted files onto the networks.
Now it appears to be setting up a side-line, generating ad revenue by tricking gullible users to download its faux warez.
It's like calling the cops to tell them that you were robbed while buying drugs. Yeah it sucks that you got 0wn3d while downloading warez but who the hell are you going to complain to and have anything done about it?
If you tattle you both get in trouble. You might get in more trouble than they will. Sad but true. Remember who has the better lawyers and the political backing...
I stopped reading at "RIAA suing BitTorrent Trackers" [sic] ...
/.
Last I checked despite your opposition to a law you can't simply "ignore it" when it doesn't suit you. Otherwise I totally call dibs on everything in your home. Cuz like "property laws" don't appeal to me.
Yet another knee-jerk fodder-podder for
Fuck humanity!
Someday, I'll have a real sig.
This reminds me of a comic I saw in the paper down here mocking those anti-drug ads. "It's okay. Just tell your dealer he can't pay his rent, 'cause you quit smoking weed."
Perhaps have a Karma system for companies:
.
Every time a positve or negative story appears add or subtract 1 point.
Then there is evidence to support the scoring and people can't click a company to oblivion.
Perhaps the board could automatically place a scoring behind a company name when it appears in a summary.
"Today it was announced by Evil corp (1pos, 113neg) everyone should pay them more."
grasshoppa has NEVER bought drugs around where I live...
copywrite infringement.
I dislike huge media companies as much as the next communist, but as somebody who pays for games, films and music rather than downloading them I get a warm feeling inside from the thought of someone downloading the lastest generic R&B album only to be owned by ads. Perfectly legitimate tactic in my opinion, and the joy the company seems to take in this persuit is a pleasure to behold.
However, the statement "turning illegitimate downloads into legitimate sales" strikes me as slightly odd. Surely any ad displayed in this way is unlikely to result in a sale since the dl jockey viewing it would be immensely pissed off. Not a very positive product image.
Great idea. The business news could give daily "Slashdaq" index reports:
"In today's Slashdaq, Microsoft fell to a record low -11,454 points. Apple's rating is still at a steady 323 despite a loss of 13 points after reports of them sueing "ThinkSecret"."
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
The problem, it transpired, was a 16-bit signed integer in a proprietary application written fifteen years ago by SBS International.
Ah, the devilish temptation of premature memory optimization! Not something to which we in the free software world would *ever* fall victim. No, no, no. Well, maybe. Anyway, we'd certainly be able to manage a timely upgrade to cope with this problem. Well, maybe.
I'm going to take a wild leap off a cliff here and venture that HAD the flight software been reviewed by thousands of eyes, the mistaked would have been avoided. But how can it be maintained if it's been locked up for 15 years?
To compare this bug with one found in a Linux distro is completely unfair. That flight software was written back when the maintainer of said distro was probably still in highschool.
Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
(clickity clickity clickity)
"Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Everyone raise your right pinky in celebration! Mu ha ha ... ha ha ha ... HA HA HA HA HA!
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
As a guy that's worked with overpeer, I don't know if I should laugh or cry :\
-- RIAA code monkey
comfort eagle steve mallet has done a fine PR job of pumping his little website here hasn't he?
I know what you mean. Kind of sad really when you think anout it: our most honest capitalist are drug dealers. (btw, I'm very pro-capitalist)
I'm planning on doing an MPAA parody featuring a fluffer.
News stories are ALWAYS written in the lite as to how it will effect distribution of the publication. The major complain heard for decades from the public has been that the vast majority of the news out there is 'bad' aka is a story about something/someone/somewhere bad. The 'bad' news is what sells. The big players in the economy are always going to get more bad news than smaller players because the news agency knows people will recognize the names better and therefore more sales of their news product. The smaller company, although they may be 'badder' or is that more bad, will always get less press because of name recognition.
In short, all a karma system based on the criteria you site is going to do is measure how much name recognition a company has and provide alternative method of tracking news sales. It will do nothing to measure 'how bad' or good a company really is.
Troll me for this, but I feel the suggestion of such a system displays a complete lack of knowledge about the media industry and that you have an inappropriate amount of investment in the context of news articles. Ever heard the old saying, "don't believe everything you read"? There is a basis in fact in that statement that you need to apply common sense and vigor in determining how much of the truth is being told to you. No necessarily whether it is a lie or not, but how much truth is included. News agencies will always leave facts out of a story if they don't fit the slant or spin they are trying to provide. It is your duty to put the facts back together and take the spin part as an editorial opinion. Discard it or stand by it, it's up to you. But placing blind trust in everything that is written in the news as a clear representation of the truth is a poor poor way to measure anything.
> None of this, "I gotta talk to ...x" or "Let me check with my vendor" crap.
You're kidding, right? You can buy $20 of weed off a dude without him having to call someone, who has to call someone else, and maybe you'll get a call back, but maybe not. And when they do get it, it may or may not be as much as you expect, or as good as you expect. Oh, and that $20? Turn out that was negotiable. This is the kindbud (honest) so it's $25. Sure, some drug dealers are extremely profesional, very easy to work with, just trying their best to provide honest customer service and product quality. But most are flaky, greedy, and stoned.
I download warez all the time. CD ISO's, and sometimes movies etc.
It's not illegal (not here), because I have the originals. The software I've yet to find a program for that will successfully rip an ISO mountable with daemontools (most ones I download don't work either, but eventually I usually get lucky). Movies I've just not the time to rip-and-reencode. But it's much nicer to have a bunch of 600MB DivX files so I can fit multiple movies onto a DVD (for travelling with my laptop) or CD-images so I don't need to constantly disc-swap.
And whose fault is it I'm downloading? The MPAA/Software venders, because they've installed anti-piracy measures that suck against piracy but restrict my legitimate imaging/etc. Is my downloading hurting anyone... no, but if the MPAA/RIAA seeds a network with virii it certainly could hurt my computer.
I used to know a guy named "Danny O'Brien". That guy caused a lot of problems for a lot of people. So, I've learned to stay clear of anyone with that name. Danny, sorry if this isn't you, but someone with your name screwed a LOT of people back in 1981 or '82. It's him you should be pissed at. But if this is you - how's the Menengitis? acting up? Good. you deserve pain and suffering. Or, perhaps the guy I knew ended up in levenworth for a long time. You don't rape your roommate's girlfriend on a millitary base and get a slap on the wrist. I do inderstand there are supposed to be a LOT of Danny O'Briens,. but it's been over 20 years since I saw that name.
when you read the title, did you think something about toastytech and his IE is evil page?
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Their lies about H-1B's and "labor shortages" are manipulative squared. The ITAA is a lobbying shill for big companies that want cheap and docile educated labor. They will say anything and do anything.
Just the other day my friend was at a movie and , during the 30 minute "captive audience" advertising segment the stuntman ad came on. Up until then he had never even considered downloading movies but the ad made him realize that instead of paying $15 to see a half hour of ads or spending about $6 to rent a video which may or may not suck (and would still include the ads), he could just download the movies ad-free in the comfort of his own home for pennies (about $1 for each movie he decides to keep). He even devised a lovely USB storage solution for his new homebrew DVD jukebox.
Yes, lets all remember that the construction guy and lighting guy, who have no equity stake in the music/video/movie etc [e.g. no front-end or back-end points] and who were paid before the production was even complete, are harmed immensly by the fact that you watched the movie/viedo or listend to the music TAHT YOU WEREN'T GOING TO BUY ANYWAY for free.
Their unionized jobs are threatened, threatend I tell you, by the possibility that the people that _do_ have the equity stake may consider that $100 million dollars is too little money for the effort, and will quit their industry to go on to a more rewarding job in the quick-serve food service industry.
The coke dealers, and those trendy pubs that have the Crystal opened and waiting for some extravagent personality to show up, are about the only secondary victims of a aught-point-nothing decrease in Britny's sales due to P2P software...
Yea, not funny, but it bears repeating.
Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
--"Code Complete" Microsoft Press