Essentially, yes. The master control (final step before transmission) has the ability to change output volume. It isn't that hard to do so (either manually or automatically, depending on the existing setup).
Apple had the advantage of inheriting NeXT's already architecture-independent API, and all of their new code respected that. Unfortunately, Win32 is *mostly* source-compatible between architectures but not entirely - it's only recently that you start seeing explicit type sizes such as UINT32 instead of just UINT - you still often have to guess what that will be on your target architecture.
Apple also inherited the Mach-O format, which encapsulates code for different architectures into a single binary - core system libraries often have code for ppc, ppc64, i386, and x86_64 all in one. PE binaries don't have that luxury, so you often see multiple binaries per architecture - proggy_x86.exe and proggy_x64.exe, for example. Imagine the confusion that would cause for your average user with ARM thrown into the mix.
Or, better yet, if security really was the goal, develop a C-like language that was secure by design?
And then why don't you make it compile to non-native code, so you can do code analysis at runtime? Might as well give it a good standard library that uses all the features so people would try writing stuff. Of course, you can't name it C then, maybe you should give it a catchier name with some punctuation or other pun on the language.
Interesting, I'm now a CS freshman at UHa and to my knowledge we own all of our equipment (sun + windows + linux servers, workstations in 3 labs) and are generally at odds with the IT department.
Slashdot Mirror
He can even sell renter's insurance! Brilliant!
What's wrong with the National Association of Marlon Brando Look-Alikes?
You could always grate cheese with it...
If you have the resources to set up Windows Deployment Services it's stupid easy to get a network install of Windows (Vista/7) going...
If you like to write lambdas instead of SQL-like queries it works just as well and either is very expressive.
How?
Huh?
What?
Please stop being so paranoid. It's not healthy.
Essentially, yes. The master control (final step before transmission) has the ability to change output volume. It isn't that hard to do so (either manually or automatically, depending on the existing setup).
It's not already?
He asked for a freer country. Australia seems destined to censor the entire Internet out of existence.
Apple had the advantage of inheriting NeXT's already architecture-independent API, and all of their new code respected that. Unfortunately, Win32 is *mostly* source-compatible between architectures but not entirely - it's only recently that you start seeing explicit type sizes such as UINT32 instead of just UINT - you still often have to guess what that will be on your target architecture.
Apple also inherited the Mach-O format, which encapsulates code for different architectures into a single binary - core system libraries often have code for ppc, ppc64, i386, and x86_64 all in one. PE binaries don't have that luxury, so you often see multiple binaries per architecture - proggy_x86.exe and proggy_x64.exe, for example. Imagine the confusion that would cause for your average user with ARM thrown into the mix.
And then why don't you make it compile to non-native code, so you can do code analysis at runtime? Might as well give it a good standard library that uses all the features so people would try writing stuff. Of course, you can't name it C then, maybe you should give it a catchier name with some punctuation or other pun on the language.
Hey, wait a minute...
Snow Leopard is Intel-only, and apparently even encourages developers to target 64-bit primarily (thus leaving out the pre-Core 2 machines).
To be pedantic, the PPC iMac was discontinued in January of 2006. If the machine is really two years old it will run Snow Leopard fine.
That would actually be Chewy on drums, Leia on vocals, Vader on bass, Han and Luke on guitar, and R2/C3PO on synth.
I would like to raise your statement an order of magnitude and suggest it is before the age of 35 that people are incapable of understanding that.
There's also the minor issue of having to port it to Java.
Ah yes, the classical separation of code and data.
I understand those words but not their meaning together.
I initially read that as "furries", which made this article VERY disturbing...
I'm reasonably certain that to get the full Vista WHQL logo a manufacturer has to provide both 32-bit and 64-bit drivers.
Interesting, I'm now a CS freshman at UHa and to my knowledge we own all of our equipment (sun + windows + linux servers, workstations in 3 labs) and are generally at odds with the IT department.
What state did that happen to be in? I've got the same setup in my CS department...
Big disclaimer: Perl does as well. Ruby differentiates itself here by disallowing infinite ways.
Wrong. Audacity is wxWidgets, which uses GTK on X11, and the native windowing toolkit elsewhere.
Has Congress ever had a high approval rating?
We need a "+5 eww" mod.