Slashdot Mirror


Sun Releases Largest Radiation Storm in 15 Years

what_the_frell writes "Newscientist is reporting that a large cluster of sunspots has just released huge amounts of radiation toward Earth. The crew of the ISS reportedly had to move into the bulkier Russian section of the station, while airlines rerouted planes away from the most affected regions. Look forward to varying degrees of radio & cell phone reception and some pretty cool aurora boreali until January 22, when the sunspot storm turns away from the earth, pointing its radiation elsewhere."

67 comments

  1. shucks by ike6116 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I blame global warming.

    --

    Are you secure enough in your masculinity to run 'man touch'?
    1. Re: shucks by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      I blame global warming.

      Cause, meet effect.
      Effect, meet cause.

    2. Re: shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but global warming doesn't exists in USA.

  2. GPRS by Shadow_139 · · Score: 2, Funny

    God Damn..., GPRS is bad as it is.....

  3. Great by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As I have already said countless times on such occasions, now astrologers, psychics and other quacks are going to force their supersticious, geocentric, pseudoscientific, religious, flat earth, stupid mambo jumbo upon us, because those solar storms must surely have an influence on people. At least there will be something interesting to read on Randi.org, I guess.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Great by foniksonik · · Score: 0

      "when the sunspot storm turns away from the earth, pointing its radiation elsewhere."

      This part of the summary post seems to suggest that it's not just quacks who are geocentric... who ever heard of the sun or it's sunspot 'turning away from the earth'... I was thinking maybe that the earth would move away from the sunspot instead,, you know as it orbits the sun. The radiation will stay where it's at but we will move out of it's path.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Great by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Sun turns around itself as well. A sun-day takes 25 days, almost a month. We can only see one side of it.

    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We can only see one side of it.

      Er... I think you are thinking about the moon---remember that it takes one year for earth to go around the sun, so unless the sun-day is almost exactly 365 days (and it's not), we will be able to see all sides of it. Isn't that precisely why the sun spot is turning away from us?

    4. Re:Great by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "NOAA officials say that the sunspot region that caused the solar storms should rotate to the far side of the Sun by 22 January..."

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    5. Re:Great by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sun rotates around itself in 25 days plus a couple of hours. Look at the Sun entry at Wikipedia. Don't bother me.

  4. the republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    they have to be behind this ... they have to..

  5. Am I the only one... by PaulBu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who reads (on ./!) "Sun releases..." and thinks about new, hopefully open-sourced, version of Solaris, not radiation? ;-)

    Paul B.

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Funny
      Of course not. I was thinking up imaginative +5, funnies like:

      Sun now more evil than Microsoft.

      NASA proves it. Sun is dieing.

      WTF? Is Sun switching to Pentium 4?

      Yet another product from Sun that noone wants.

      But none of these are funny enough. And the weather is almost as bad as it's been since the start of November. Oh, well, I could see the moon. That's quite extraordinary around here.

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Issue9mm · · Score: 4, Funny

      My reply was going to be "So is 'Radiation Storm' going to be open sourced, or is this just another press release?"

      Still, not quite making the grade.

      -9mm-

    3. Re:Am I the only one... by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Sun expresses displeasure at inauguration of Bush."

      --
      I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    4. Re:Am I the only one... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, my reply would be (if I were to make one)

      THERE, SEE? YOUR DAMNED GLOBAL WARMING HAS NOW SCREWED UP THE SUN!

      I won't post that, though. Too many morons would probably think, "Hey... what if that's true..."

      --- Begin Evil DoubleSig: ----
      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it should be good enough for these people."

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    5. Re:Am I the only one... by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Hell, if I read that anywhere (slashdot or not) I think I'll wait till a 2.0 version before I even think about using it.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:Am I the only one... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I assumed Radiation Storm was their competitor to BitTorrent or something.

    7. Re:Am I the only one... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, the whole thing turned out to be just eyecandy!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Am I the only one... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Mine was going to be something to the effect of "The radiation storm was discharged by Sun's investors when they discovered that Sun was open-sourcing Solaris.".

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    9. Re:Am I the only one... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      What about "Only the old people in Korea watch sunspots?" posts?

    10. Re:Am I the only one... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Sorry, only old people in Korea-jokes are not on my repertoire. Neither are Beowulf-jokes, unless you count my collection of clichés above as a Beowulf-cluster of tired old jokes. And maybe it is. As you know:

      1. Beowulf-cluster
      2. ???
      3. +5, funny

      I'll get my coat.

    11. Re:Am I the only one... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these sunspots... Especially when they usually cluster around... Anyway.. :P

    12. Re:Am I the only one... by Borgschulze · · Score: 1

      Hahaha me, that's what I thought at first then I read more..

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Linux compiles you!
  6. No by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one... Who reads (on ./!) "Sun releases..." and thinks about new, hopefully open-sourced, version of Solaris, not radiation?

    No. And you are also not the only one if you read the story and thought "great, another IIS vulnerability."

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  7. Northern Hemisphere Bias by Noodlenose · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As usual in Slashdot, the whole commentary is of course very northern hemisphere biased.

    We down here at the end of the world on New Zealand's South Island look forward to view the magnificent Aurora australiensis, even if it is horribly misnamed.

    1. Re:Northern Hemisphere Bias by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I know. New Zealand should really have been named "A couple of small islands off the coast of Australia".

      Or did you mean that the aurorae in the SOuthern Hemisphere should have been named differently? You're right, of course -- aurora's have nothing to do with the dawn.

    2. Re:Northern Hemisphere Bias by Sepper · · Score: 1

      magnificent Aurora australiensis, even if it is horribly misnamed.

      I hate to be a Grammar Nazis (Hell i'm not even a native english speaker) but shouldn't that be aurora australis ?

      And if you don't like the name just say it's a Polar Aurora
      :)

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    3. Re:Northern Hemisphere Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."A couple of small islands off the coast of Australia"...

      'Round here most people refer to them as East Bondi...

  8. Microsystems or solar system? by invisik · · Score: 1

    Sun who?

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  9. Ahem... by NonSequor · · Score: 4, Informative

    The plural of aurora borealis would be aurorae boreales.

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    1. Re:Ahem... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      The plural of aurora borealis would be aurorae boreales.

      Pronounce both as "aurora borealis".

    2. Re:Ahem... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      What did the Romans ever done for us? Apart from the aqueduct, the sanitation, irrigation and the roads, medicine, education, health and the wine, public baths, the public order?

    3. Re:Ahem... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      What did the Romans ever done for us? Apart from the aqueduct, the sanitation, irrigation and the roads, medicine, education, health and the wine, public baths, the public order?

      You can't think of XI things?

  10. Nice Timing by vigilology · · Score: 5, Funny

    Posted by michael on 23:52 Friday 21 January 2005: "Look forward to varying degrees of radio & cell phone reception and some pretty cool aurora boreali until January 22". Wow, thanks. All of eight minutes to look forward to something and drive to a place with a nice clear sky.

    1. Re:Nice Timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All of eight minutes to look forward to something and drive to a place with a nice clear sky.

      Egh. Aurora borealis isn't caused by EM radiation---it's caused by charged particles (proton radiation, if you will) from the sun, so it takes much, much longer than 8 minutes. I forget exactly how long, but I believe it's on the order of magnitude of a day---and that's why scientists can predict that we will have big aurorae boreales at all (kind of like lightening and thunder---you see the lightening, and you think, "A thunder is coming soon....").

    2. Re:Nice Timing by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      It takes a while for those protons to slam into the atmosphere and satellites so you are safe for at least a day. They are fast but NAFAL.

    3. Re:Nice Timing by kauschovar · · Score: 1

      If you re-read the parent's post you'll see that he was not referring to the eight minutes it take light to reach Earth from the Sun. He was pointing out that michael posted this at 23:52 21-Jan-2005 (8 minutes until 22-Jan-2005) and said "...until January 22."

  11. Wireless internet? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you thi@%S^$@I%ere will be any pr%^VW#$%ms with wirel$%^)*VDTY$%^#$B%^&$%ternet?

    1. Re:Wireless internet? by nickjl · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not real interference, you just faked it by pasting in lines of Perl.

  12. Upgrade by wan-fu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will this release take a version jump from 1.4 to 5.0?

  13. All well and good... by rjw57 · · Score: 1

    Sun Releases Largest Radiation Storm in 15 Years

    All well and good but when is OpenSolaris coming?

    --
    Rich
  14. Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's curious that that pluralization to aurorae boreales has stuck around so long. It's certainly used. For example, Walt Whitman wrote

    "
    Amid pictures that dart upon me even as I speak, and glow and mix and coruscate and fade like aurorae boreales.
    --Walt Whitman, "Notes (Such as They Are) Founded on Elias Hicks"
    "

    But why is this?

    For example, "major general"
    would be pluralized to "majors general"
    when it was newly introduced into the language. The pluralization would follow its, I believe, french roots.

    As the word stayed longer in our language it would be treated as an english phrase. We would eventually start saying "major generals"

    Websters dictionary gives the following entymology for aurora borealis;

    [New Latin aurra borelis : Latin aurra, dawn + Latin borelis, northern.]

    My question is; why are we still treating 'Aurora Borealis' like a foreign phrase? In English, we certainly wouldn't say "northerns lights." Is it because it's considered a technical term so we still treat it as a latin phrase? Or is it just not popular enough in its usage to be treated as plain English?

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Well, I was mainly responding to the fact that the article submitter wrote "aurora boreali." Aurora borealises comes across as somewhat awkward, but really not much more so than aurorae boreales.

      It sort of irks me when people don't know languages but try to guess their way through them. In general it's wisest to just use English plurals, since using foreign plurals in anything other than the simplest cases generally doesn't mix well with English.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    2. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why are people treating a method of pluralising as foreign?

      it is no more foreign that the word itself.

      the English language orginates from many different languages. this doesn't just include the words itself, but the methods to use them - ie, including plurals.

    3. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      the English language orginates from many different languages.

      Yes, but there are 'standard' rules to English. Over time, foreign words tend to give up their foreign pluralizations in favor of those which match better with 'standard' English.

      There isn't really a better authority in this case than precedent and facility. This is what usually happens to language. It usually happens because its easier.

      Just like we no longer say the 'ed' at the ends of words, just the 'd' sound. It changed because it's easier, and words do that.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    4. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) Aurora borealises is inconvenient because of a double "s" sound. Besides, the general rule for "cactuses" instead of "cacti" and so forth is different species of cactuses. This is the same aurora, just several of them.

      2) Majors general is because major is the noun. The French plural would be majors generaux. Also, we've come to assume that "major" is the adjective and "general" is the noun, when apparently the reverse is true.

      3) In most Romance languages, including Latin, you do indeed say the literal translation of "northerns lights" or "lights northerns." English is an exception. If we pluralize it according to Latin rules, we'd have to make both plural. Besides, Aurorae borealis and aurora boreales are both awkward, although I doubt that's what you mean.

      4) We still say bacteria instead of bacteriums, right? I'm sure we'd still keep the French plural if we understood it was French and called it a "mah-JOR jey-ney-RAHL."

    5. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In English, we certainly wouldn't say "northerns lights."
      We might say "Northern Lightses" though my preciouss...
    6. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      • We might say "Northern Lightses" though my preciouss...


      we wants them.
      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    7. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      The problem is, even if Aurora Borealis was treated as an English phrase, Aurora is still the subject, and that's what should be pluralized. Sure, we don't pluralize adjectives in English, so we might say Aurorae Borealis instead of Aurorae Boreales, but pluralizing just the adjective would be about the wrongest thing you could do.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    8. Re:Aurorae Boreales vs Aurora Borealesees by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      I cannot resist to shamelessly rip off http://www.lagged.za.net/scripts/Monty_Python,_Lif e_Of_Brian_-_Script.html:

      C: What's this thing?
      "ROMANES EUNT DOMUS"?
      "People called Romanes they go the house"?
      B: It, it says "Romans go home".
      C: No it doesn't. What's Latin for "Roman"?
      B: (hesitates)
      C: Come on, come on!
      B: (uncertain) "ROMANUS".
      C: Goes like?
      B: "-ANUS".
      C: Vocative plural of "-ANUS" is?
      B: "-ANI".
      C: (takes paintbrush from Brian and paints over) "RO-MA-NI".
      "EUNT"? What is "EUNT"?
      B: "Go".
      C: Conjugate the verb "to go"!
      B: "IRE". "EO", "IS", "IT", "IMUS", "ITIS", "EUNT".
      C: So "EUNT" is ...?
      B: Third person plural present indicative, "they go".
      C: But "Romans, go home!" is an order, so you must use the ...?
      (lifts Brian by his hairs)
      B: The ... imperative.
      C: Which is?
      B: Ahm, oh, oh, "I", "I"!
      C: How many romans? (pulls harder)
      B: Plural, plural! "ITE".
      C: (strikes over "EUNT" and paints "ITE" to the wall)
      (satisfied) "I-TE".
      "DOMUS"? Nominative? "Go home", this is motion towards, isn't it, boy?
      B: (very anxious) Dative?
      C: (draws his sword and holds it to Brian's throat)
      B: Ahh! No, ablative, ablative, sir. No, the, accusative, accusative,
      ah, DOMUM, sir.
      C: Except that "DOMUS" takes the ...?
      B: ... the locative, sir!
      C: Which is?
      B: "DOMUM".
      C: (satisfied) "DOMUM" (strikes out "DOMUS" and writes "DOMUM") "-MUM".
      Understand?
      B: Yes sir.
      C: Now write it down a hundred times.
      B: Yes sir, thank you sir, hail Caesar, sir.
      C: (salutes) Hail Caesar.
      If it's not done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off.
      B: (very reliefed) Oh thank you sir, thank you sir, hail Caesar and
      everything, sir!

  15. Can't get some work done! by helioquake · · Score: 1

    Damn it, the Sun.

    We can't get much work done here. At any time a solar flare produces a greater flux of high energy particles in space, we have to shut down spacecrafts til everything is nominal. A series of the recent flare events are shutting down at least one satellite since Jan 16th and now it looks like the blackout will last til 23rd. That's a major blow to the efficiency of the usage (one of NASA's favorite metrics).

    1. Re:Can't get some work done! by FUSENerd · · Score: 1

      Which satellite is that, I wonder? Looks like you're near Boston so I'm assuming CXO? Our satellite (FUSE) has never had detector background problems that could be strongly associated with solar flares. However, we're in safemode for other reasons right now, so I don't know what the most recent flare would have done to our detectors. :)

  16. New Computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought Sun actually released a decently product when I saw the title....

  17. It's all part of the plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. Sweet... by MonMotha · · Score: 2, Informative

    And there's the ARRL VHF sweepstakes this weekend. Should certainly be fun. 6m was open tonight (was hearing Florida in Indiana), but things may change over the weekend.

    I'm not very familiar with VHF/UHF propagation modes. Anyone have any hints on what this may do to propagation on the VHF and up bands?

    1. Re:Sweet... by js7a · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lots of noise with occasional increases in reflectivity, but often at multiple altitudes. Sometimes auroral propagation on VHF is really sigificant, but don't count on it.

  19. futurama quote by sagekoala06 · · Score: 1

    from when bender shines the Z ray at Fry's crotch in the episode Fry and the Slurm Factory ... "AWW, my sperm!"

    The Sun ... making good men go sterile since the begining of time.

  20. "The sun" would have been more appropriate by photon317 · · Score: 1


    I was imaging this big deathray pointing out of Sun's HQ towards Redmond.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:"The sun" would have been more appropriate by Ajmuller · · Score: 0, Redundant

      At least I know i wasn't the only one who thought it was sun and not sol

  21. Russian section -heavily guarded... by bikerguy99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    do the cosmonavts need to show their passports when crossing to the Russian section?

  22. I saw this sunspot last week by GreatDrok · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was driving down to Newcastle from Edinburgh last week (15th) wearing my usual dark glasses and there was low cloud which meant I could see the sun's disc without it blinding me. There, right in the centre, a little above the mid point, was a huge spot. I told my wife to look at it too as I thought it was interesting to see a sunspot so clearly without any visual aids other than dark glasses and some cloud. Man, that thing is big......

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  23. Errr.... by Punboy · · Score: 1

    I think you have SUN confused with SCO... Oh wait, that was a legal storm... ignore me.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  24. Satellites lost... by Exocet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't Intelsat just recently lose a satellite? Like, just the other day? I saw some slashdot'ers speculating on various causes (metal whiskers were my favourite) but perhaps sunspot activity had something to do with it?

    Admittedly, they lost it on the 14th, so perhaps this is a tenuous grasp at best.

    Intelsat Loses Another Satellite

    --
    Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
  25. damn rain. by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    damn that falling water and cloudy sky. every damn chance i've had to see the Aurora has been foiled. eithe rbecause i didn't know about it in time or because it's so cloudy. damn this rain.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  26. Gravity Probe B affected as well. by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gravity Probe B (previously discussed on Slashdot here and here.) was also affected according to their latest bulletin.