Slashdot Mirror


Just How Paranoid Are You?

An anonymous reader writes "We all understand the need for security in a corporate environment. Personal computers, however, typically don't have nearly the amount of sensitive information (or it's at least less damaging if found). How far do you go to protect your computer? I recently went overboard on securing my information (at least as secure as Windows XP can be). I have a hardware firewall (GTA GB500), 30 character password, and all remotely personal information stored on a 256bit AES encrypted volume. How far do you go to protect your information against 'Big Brother' or even your family/friends?"

56 of 931 comments (clear)

  1. Physical access! by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

    The most critical item any computer security professional will tell you to take care of: Physical access. If you have a concern, this is your first line of defense and in fact, most top secret installations have considerable resources dedicated to physical access. Next down the line in terms of security risk will be issues related to physical access that again most top secret installations have resolved by disallowing any removable media in or around secured systems. After that comes any issues of network security because your greatest security risk is internal access.

    You should not be carrying any sensitive work related items or data home, but if you have personal stuff (or a home business with IT critical information) you wish to secure, short of establishing a computer "vault" with limited access in your home (actually had one once for a project I was working on), you need to start with a secure OS. This does not mean Windows, unless you can afford a "hardened" version and are skilled at management. In fact, I would say from your question that all of the things you are already doing are the absolute minimum if you are using Windows. If you are truly this paranoid and keep sensitive info on your personal computer, and you obviously have a connection to the Internet, it should also mean, physically removing the Internet connection from your computer at times when you do not need it. Multi-casting OS capable machines like certain flavors *NIX are helpful here, so you dont have to deal with Windows network wizard every time you connect back up (if you use certain settings for your network). Wireless should be a no-no as well. IF you are really (read pathologically or are doing something quite illegal) paranoid, you could also build a Faraday cage around your room and charge it to reduce risk of TEMPEST related probes, but again if this is a concern, someone simply breaking in (again access) is often easier and cheaper.

    When you are actually connected to the Internet, a hardware firewall is an absolute necessity. Network address translation will help limit some attacks. And aside from all the other things you are doing (strong passwords, encryption etc....), I would strongly urge you to constantly pay attention to your logs. Your most important data will be gleaned from the logs in terms of who is attacking, their strategies for attacking, when and where.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Physical access! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hardware firewall? What, it's built all from gates and has no code on it? There's no such thing. A linksys befsr41 is a "hardware firewall" because it's a dedicated firewall appliance, right? It runs Linux. A PIX 520, that's a hardware firewall, yes? They cost a lot new and they come in a 4U case. Woops, it's an intel PC.

      A firewall that's not on a trusted host, that's a necessity. It doesn't really matter if it's a Nokia box or monowall, what matters is that you configure it correctly and keep it updated. I'm thinking about setting up a transparent bridging firewall so my wall doesn't even have to have IP addresses.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Physical access! by BWJones · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, yeah......and I DO pay attention to my logs, so that dude at 67.13X.XXX.XX in Vancouver Washington who linked to my machine from Slashdot just now and is trying to get access, I am watching you as we speak . A little more work and I can have your GPS coordinates too. :-)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Physical access! by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ok, how many admins out there who take backup tapes home as your offsite solution?

      This may be modded as funny, but is actually quite interesting. I know of a number (at least I know they used to) of sysadmins whose offsite backup was at home. This included some organizations with fairly substantial interests in limiting the access to their information. It should be company policy to properly pay for and establish a secure off site location for backups that are not in insecure locations like peoples homes. This should include any company that backs up information related to personnel information like SS#'s and such. For lots of companies or research institutions with just research info that is not sensitive, backups at home can be wholy appropriate.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    4. Re:Physical access! by danheskett · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then you turn off his power, cut his phone line, and cause his gas oven to blow up. Ohh. wait.. real life doesn't follow movie rules about what "hackers" can do?

    5. Re:Physical access! by gunnk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Generally, a "hardware firewire" simply means a device dedicated to working as a firewall whereas a "software firewall" means a program running on the computer to be protected. It does not imply that a hardware firewall does not have a software component.

      I run both a hardware and a software firewall. If one is compromised the potential intruder finds yet another. My sensitive data is also all encrypted, so even if the intruder breaks the second one he/she isn't likely to get much of value.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    6. Re:Physical access! by jhagler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy.

      Right-click on the network icon in the system tray then select "Disable". Seems easier to me than having to bring up a console, enter 25 characters, and hit return.

      I'm no Microsoft fan but come on, ya gotta pick your battles a little better than this.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
    7. Re:Physical access! by robertjw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohh. wait.. real life doesn't follow movie rules about what "hackers" can do?

      Shhhh... don't tell people that!!! I like the all-consuming power I have as a computer geek.

    8. Re:Physical access! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You right click on the connection's system tray icon and click disable.

      OK, now perform that action in a shell script.

      /smartass

    9. Re:Physical access! by bcmm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, don't tell them. I love the way people respect and fear me just because I use bash and cmd.exe.

      Seriously, some people are very impressed by CLIs. Especially green ones. Try "cat /dev/urandom" on a green terminal to make dummies think you are doing real work...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    10. Re:Physical access! by brunson · · Score: 4, Funny

      So I have a dual homed laptop that is doing nothing but NAT, port filtering and routing using IPTables under linux. Is that a hardware or a software firewall?

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      Jesus loves you, I think you suck
    11. Re:Physical access! by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny
      Then you turn off his power, cut his phone line, and cause his gas oven to blow up.

      Finally, someone explains what .NET is supposed to do.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    12. Re:Physical access! by jakupovic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, I'm gonna bite how about http://www.ntcompatible.com/thread29224-1.html

      basically "netsh interface set interface name="Local Area Connection" admin=DISABLED"

      --
      You always point your finger at the bad guy, but what if the bad guy points his finger at you?
    13. Re:Physical access! by crazyphilman · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I think of "hardware firewall" I think of a device which stores its software and rules in static ROM which (hopefully) can't be flashed from the LAN side. This is more secure because A) it's not a machine you're actually working on, and B) there's nothing really THERE except for the operating software, and that would be kind of tricky to hack, C) it can be set up so that nobody can really initiate anything from the LAN port anyway.

      What I do at my apartment is this:

      I have a hardware firewall the size of a paperback book, a D-Link that's fully patched, with rules that won't allow any incoming traffic and which logs everything I didn't initiate and periodically emails me the logs when they fill up;

      My computer is a mil-spec Panasonic CF-28 laptop, water resistant and shockproof, with an armored LCD and a silicone-mounted hard drive in a stainless steel caddy;

      My operating system is Slackware Linux which I've hardened. It isn't running any services anyone can try to connect to, and it's running a paranoid iptables firewall which drops all packets I didn't specifically ask for, logging everything sneaky. It's fully patched, and I have different accounts I use for accessing the internet and doing other work (if I'm going to program or write, I disconnect the ethernet cable and log in with my other userid).

      I use an up to date Mozilla or Firefox exclusively, and I have software installation disabled (I only enable it when I'm going to get something from the Mozilla site).

      For mail, I use kmail, set up so it doesn't automatically display HTML -- I have to choose to view HTML if I know the sender.

      I *think* I've thought about just about everything, but who knows? Of course, if something weird happens, I've got good backups so I can rebuild my system in an evening.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  2. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Like I'm going to discuss that here on Slashdot! You know who might be reading.

  3. Paranoid? Not much... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    I have OpenBSD on my firewall and main work machine. Encrypted partitions too. GPG everything. My Windows 2000 game machine is locked tight and on a DMZ without IE being used. My monitor is wrapped in tinfoil, naturally, with a small cutout just large enough to have a 640x480 window viewable. I wrapped my mouse in tinfoil but that made it hard to use so I cut a hole in the bottom which allowed the light to hit the desk surface. Problem there was the desk was wrapped in tinfoil, too. So I made my own mousepad because I don't trust the ones made by The Man. It's made from a dead rabbit I found on the street. I flattened it out and dehydrated it. When I need a random number I pinch some fur and pull. however many strands of fur I get in that pull is the random number I use. Of course I need a new mousepad every few weeks as I never reuse the same tuft of fur twice. Never trust the PRNG in any OS, even OpenBSD. Theo is watching. Speaking of that, the other day I was installing OpenBSD 3.6 on a new machine and then I realized... CDs are a form of RFID tag. The unique bit patterns on them can be detected from space. So I wrap my CDs in tinfoil when not in use. Speaking of tinfoil, I find it best to buy the cheapest stuff from dollar stores. They don't usually use the UPC barcoding at those places. Just "$1.. $1.. $1..". Barcode readers don't use OpenBSD but I think Theo is trying to get in there. Speaking of barcodes, the other day I pulled a package of gum from my pocket and the person I was with said "Ohh... Spearmint!" I ran away. He obviously has a remote UPC scanner and knew that I had spearmint gum. He says the wrapper was in plain site but I think that's just an excuse.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Paranoid? Not much... by squidfood · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Six to base. He picked up the rabbit we left. We have access. Repeat. We have access."

  4. Why should I be paranoid? by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, doesn't everyone have my best interests at heart? Why, just the other day, a nice Nigerian man sent me an e-mail about a wonderful offer, and I don't even know him!

    Hellooooo, Mr. Government Man!

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
  5. My computer by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny

    My computer is encased in Carbonite, and it is stored in a file cabinet in the basement with a sign on the door "Beware of Leopard". The password? I tore it to bits, put bacon grease on it, and fed it to the dog. However, these measures are not enough for security: the machine itself happens to be one of those cardboard replica PCs you find on furniture in the back of "Staples". No WAY you gonna hack this sucker!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  6. This far by js3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I lock the door to my house when I leave home

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  7. Big Brother... by djsmiley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is there any point in trying to protect against BIG Brother really? I mean, if they WANT to get in, they could just storm your house and take away your PC. If the want they could slience you too. So why go so over the top?

    Another idea is to make sure any sensitive infomation doesn't have any means of escape, hell build a machine with no network, and no floppy drive or cd writer. Take out the usb slots too, then maybe a passer by wont be able to access it.

    30char password? Whats the point? I mean you can still brute force it, and even without doing this, theres still methods such as removing the hdd drive, mounting it under anther computer and 99% time, you got instant access to everything.

    People need to learn, senstive data is only protected in ONE place, inside our minds.
    Keep it there and no one can snoop it.

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    1. Re:Big Brother... by Beetle+B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to be missing perhaps the most fundamental aspect of security: "Make your data secure enough such that it is not worth anyone's time to get past the security measures".

      Note that this does not mean make your data as humanly secure as possible. If it takes six months of brute force time to break my encryption, I don't mind. I don't have anything that is worth the trouble. So I'm not going to create hurdles for myself by securing it further.

      If you have more valuable data, then make it as much harder to get to it. Going overboard will not gain you anything, other than a hassle.

      Yes, big brother can storm my house, and torture the information out of me. But it's not worth their trouble. It perhaps would be worth it if I had no security measures and conducted all my Internet transactions in plain text. So I just use a few simple measures to make sure it's not that easy.

      --
      Beetle B.
  8. I am so worried.... by jmcmunn · · Score: 5, Funny


    I run only knoppix Live CD, and I incinerate my RAM after I am done just to be sure there's nothing left on that RamDisk. Kingston loves me now!

  9. Thanks for the info by yack0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks for letting us know you have a 30 character password. That'll be much easier to crack than having to deal with 1 - 29 and 31 - infinity length password.

    --
    -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  10. Security against 'Big Brother' is a myth by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Security against 'Big Brother' is a myth, especially given that it is very easy for authorities all over the world to label someone a "terrorist", or a "person of interest", and lock him/her up for years without any oversight.

    S

  11. Nerd guards by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    I keep a bunch of nerds surrounding my house for security. I feed them doritos and keep them motivated by issuing fake Duke Nukem Forever press releases. When I see them becoming too docile, I toss Windows Magazine at them to get them all riled up.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

  12. "Just How Paranoid Are You?" by Wordsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who wants to know?

  13. How much truely private stuff do you have? by syousef · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only things I really consider private on my computer are financial information. Receipts, credit card numbers etc. So yes I do go to some trouble protecting that, but for the most part I couldn't care less if my information was read illegally. There's just nothing of consequence there.

    If someone actually compromised and trashed my PC on the other hand, I'd lose time in rebuilding it. HoweverI do back up my information regularly, so that's no issue either except being annoyed at the loss of time. (If someone made subtle changes to the information I'd still have older backups, so it would be painful but not unrecoverable).

    If you truely need a private information store, it may be worth buying a PC that isn't net connected and that is physically secured. For the average person unless you're doing something illegal or have sensitive work material at home (arguably not a good idea anyway), why would you need a super-unbreakable encrypted PC?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  14. Careful with swap and temp files by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Informative

    "and all remotely personal information stored on a 256bit AES encrypted volume."

    Windows will leave temp files all over the place and your pagefile could have any data that was kept in RAM. The superparanoid run Linux w/ an encrypted root partition and Windows inside a VM from an encrypted disk image.

  15. Erased my brain by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I made an end run on this whole problem. With some carefully executed electro shock therapy, I erased all of my personal information from my own brain!
    Just try your evil identity theft tricks now!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  16. Re:Esay easy easy by fimbulvetr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh yeah, guess all those security vulnerabilites listed on securityfocus are just bogus, eh?
    How about unpublished exploits? All those take care of too?

  17. Lock grandma in the closet! by xtermin8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually the above post illustrates a problem- giving highly technical advice to the masses. The above post is imformative, but I don't think it addresses the correct audience. What do you do for a family that does not include a security professional in the household? "Don't let your children's friends have unlimited access to the computer" might be more appropriate

  18. Relocate serve to DMZ by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Home server(s) on a DMZ"

    Never thought of effecting security by relocating my home server to the no-man's-land in the middle of the Korean peninsula. I think you may be on to something. No one would ever think to check there!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  19. My security system by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Physical access is a concern. But I work from home and have my servers here (my business is currently home-based). So simple things like locking doors etc.

    The first question is how you identify what threats you are protecting yourself from. My list includes viruses, script kiddiez, and the occasional person who has moderate resources and wants to break into my network. I am not too worried about tempest probes because the it would take a lot of time to get enough information off my systes this way to be of use, but I am more concerned about vandalism and damage.

    So here are my mechanisms:

    1) Keep door locked when not at home.
    2) Hardware firewall on old Acer Advantage. Kernel does not support loadable kernel modules (which makes it a pain to change a network card, as the kernel must be recompiled). Firewall runs IPTables and logs most denied traffic.
    3) Daily and monthly reports of firewall activity are sent to my inbox via cron and FWReport. FWReport leans towards false-positives, bit it gives you an idea of what "may" be happening.
    4) Remote access requires SSH and public key authentication. Remote access is not possible via password.
    5) Email servers run Qmail.
    6) Most servers are jailed.
    7) Most logs are set to "append only"
    8) Servers run minimal configurations with a minimum of extensions. For example, Apache does not run any modules not currently required.
    9) Windows is not generally allowed on the network.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:My security system by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've just given me, and everyone else, a detailed list of attacks which will not work against you (saves us time, thank you!), and presuming that you've given an exhaustive list, you've also told us what holes are in your methods and where they are. You've given us some hints as to your software packages (Qmail, FWReport, IPTables, Apache, mostly non-windows machines) so we can go look up bug reports and exploits for them...

      Who says any of the rest of this information is not easy to determine?

      lets see:

      Apache is kept reasonably up to date.

      FWReport is a report generator. Not directly exploitable. All it does is send me reports, and I wrote it and released it open source (as advertised on the web site), so you would expect me to be running it, right? I am sure you would expect Theo to be running OpenBSD too, right?

      Qmail.... When was the last time there was an exploit in Qmail?

      Look.... If you use Netcraft, you can see I am using Apache. Not saying so does not mean people can't find out. If you use Netcraft, you can even see I am running Linux.

      Hmmm.... and if you check port 110, it is open and you can look up the welcome message to see I am in fact running Qmail. So I have saved you, what? 10 minutes online with Google and Netcraft by telling you this information? How hard is it to determine this information? How hard is it to obscure this information?

      In essence, nothing I said is anything I could keep secret anyway from an attacker who would even do light recon.

      Now.... Beyond the basics (here is where I won't tell you details but can tell you principles and design ideas):

      1) If a program fails and is compromised, that should provide as little access to anything else as possible.

      2) If I have to require passwords on one remotely accessible resource, these passwords should not be reusable on another group of such resources.

      It is all about defence in depth and providing as many obstacles as possible to cause damage to me and my business, and containing the damage so that we can gracefully recover with a minimum of downtime. I won't share details. But I think we can all agree on the goals (these goals have been discussed in other whitepapers I have written, so again, this is public information).

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  20. Firey death to the intruders! by xtermin8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I pile my old computer hardware into a wall around the house, and from time to time pour gasoline and light it on fire. A hadware firewall. The neighbors don't appreciate it, but it gives me a lot of security

    1. Re:Firey death to the intruders! by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 3, Funny
      Amen to that. Between burns, I've got mine locked down like Fort Knox: software firewall, SSH, hell, I even have a BIOS password.

      That's right. The way that works is you have to enter a password when you start the computer or it won't boot into the OS. That means that nobody has a snowball's chance in HELL of getting onto my machine when I'm not around.

      That's what I call secure.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    2. Re:Firey death to the intruders! by mejesster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they have physical access, they can just reset the BIOS... Plus you probably have floppy or CD set as boot first, in which case a simple bootable floppy or CD could circumvent all your elaborate security.

      --
      MacroHard - Boning you in a big way! (TM)
  21. I'm not paranoid enough.... by Sefert · · Score: 5, Funny
    My girlfriend read my email recently. Found out I told a friend she was lousy in bed.

    Turns out bad sex is better than no sex. I'll have to be more grateful for what I get with the next girlfriend.

  22. I think... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...this is just a trick post to lure me out.

  23. Paranoia quotes by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Paranoia Quotes

    I was walking home one night and a guy hammering on a roof called me a paranoid little weirdo. In morse code. -Emo Phillips

    No matter how paranoid I get, it's never enough to keep up.

    The question is not whether I'm paranoid, it's whether I'm paranoid enough.

    The truly paraniod are rarely conned.

    Doesn't matter if I'm paranoid - they're still after me.

    I sincerely believe people talk about me. Mine would be a pretty meaningless existance if they didn't.

    Why are some people terrified of "black helicopters" and don't even notice that they are being monitored almost constantly by the whole network of obvious surveilance cameras, credit cards, ATMs, EZpass, company ID/access cards, magazine subscriptions, SSNs, taxes, fees, video rentals, Internet firewall recording, 'cookies', ... ?

    Paranoia: the belief that someone cares.

    Paranoia is the belief in a hidden order behind the visible.

    When everyone is out to get you, paranoia is only good thinking.

    "Paranoia is knowing all the facts." - Woody Allen

    "Paranoia is just another word for longevity." - Laurell K. Hamilton, The Laughing Corpse

    "Perfect paranoia is perfect awareness."

    "Paranoia is reality seen on a finer scale." - Philo Gant, Strange Days

    "The issue is not whether you are paranoid, the issue is whether you are paranoid enough." - Max, Strange Days

    "Why are you so paranoid, Mulder?"
    "Oh, I don't know. Maybe it's because I find it hard to trust anybody." - Scully & Mulder, The X-Files, "Ascension"

    Paranoia strikes deep / Into your life it will creep / It starts when you're / always afraid. You step out / of line, the man come and / take you away.

    "I don't agonize over decisions as much these days. The criteria of what's important to me is clear. The insecurity that you feel, and the paranoia that you feel, have been around for a long time -- you know it's a liar because it's been lying to you all along -- every time you start something new. You get used to it, and you sort of go, 'Oh, you're showing up again, well f*** you.'" - John Cusack

    Freedom is just a hallucination created by a pathological lack of paranoia.

    Paranoia doesn't mean the whole world really isn't out to get you.

    If you ever wanted to know what a person with acute paranoia looks like, just keep watching.

    I have the power to channel my imagination into ever-soaring levels of suspicion and paranoia.

    Paranoia is heightened awareness.

    Paranoia is a social disease--you get it from screwing other people.

    "Paranoia is the delusion that your enemies are organized." - Arthur D. Hlavaty.

    "This is the Nineties, Bubba, and there is no such thing as Paranoia. It's all true." - Hunter S Thompson

    "There are two kinds of paranoia: Total, and insufficient. I am both, because if you think you are sufficiently paranoid, you're not." - Guildenstern, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

    "The truly paranoid are clever enough to not *act* paranoid." - Q, Star Trek: The Next Generation

    "When everyone _is_ out to get to you, being paranoid isn't going to help." - Q, Star Trek: The Next Generation

    "When did you get so paranoid?"
    "When they started plotting against me." - The Paper

    "Paranoia is only the leading edge of the discovery that everything in the world is connected." - `The Illuminatus Trilogy'

    When you've been through everything I have, paranoia is merely a precaution!

    Paranoia is not the belief that everybody's out to get you -- they are. Paranoia is the belief that everybody's conspiring to get you.

    The greater the concentration of power, the greater the paranoia it generates about its need to destroy everything outside itself.

    I love this job. Nothing like paranoia and neurosis. Who needs a Coke habit? I've got journalism!!

    There's something inherently American about paranoia. Given the i

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  24. Just how paranoid are you? Translation: by venom600 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How far will you go to protect your pr0n collection from your wife's prying, suspicious eyes? :)

  25. doctors? lawyers? by coyote-san · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do you think only "corporate" (which seem to be big iron since you contrast it to "personal computers") have sensitive data?

    What about doctors? Lawyers? Accountants? Schools? Bookstores? etc.

    If you've been paying attention to the news you'll know that every so often somebody buys a used computer disk and finds the results of STD tests (including AIDS) for tens of thousands of people. Or the name, address and credit card information for thousands of customers.

    The loss of this information may not cause the DJIA to drop 10%, but it can be devastating to the people involved. But security is often lax since it's "only" a PC and it never occurs to these people that their computers may be stolen precisely because of the confidential information on the disk.

    Even home users can face a difficult situation if they take their work home. They have a duty to protect that information... then they work on those files on virus-ridden systems. Today's viruses seem to focus on spam and stealing credit card numbers, but it's not hard to imagine more sophisticated attackers looking for other information.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  26. Re:Physical security is the only important securit by gunnk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone without a strong root password is likely to have a strong root password provided for them by an "outside consultant". :-)

    --
    Life is short: void the warranty.
  27. You call *that* secure? by ukleafer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I keep my data on a proprietary system of my own devising - the gibbon/pigeonhole arrangement:

    Deep inside my personal mountain lair is my own manually operated paperbased datacentre housing a colony of approximately 6,000 intricately trained gibbons who perform the day to day roles of system administration and data archiving.

    When I access my partitions from windows in the comfort of my home, I'm not browsing local hard drives, oh no. I have had one of my gibbons integrate his brain into the windows kernel so that he is at one with my filesystems. I call him Ook. When I read/write to the partitions, Ook interprets the commands and passes them on to a waiting messenger gibbon, using a custom developed encrypted adaptation of the gibbon language, unintelligible to other gibbons in case big brother trains some gibbons of his own and infiltrates my workforce.

    Anyway, the messenger gibbons (who are hand picked in a rigorous training scheme for their incredible memories) scamper off to my mountain datacentre, passing through retinal, palm, and voice identification scans, before entering a 128bit hexadecimal password (case sensitive) into a keyboard that is not QWERTY in format, but is made up of blocks in the ground which must be jumped on to enter each character. The blocks aren't labelled as such, but are cryptically imprinted with pictorial representations of the alphanumeric characters they represent (eg: picture of toast, rhymes with ghost, ghosts are scary, scary rhymes with hairy, hairy has five letres, thereforce that block represents the number 5, see?).

    So anyhow, once the messenger gibbon enters the secure area of my datacentre, he passes the message on to one of the worker gibbons, light in build and superb gymnasts, who moves to the appropriate pigeon hole in a 2D array laid out on a rock wall measuring more or less 1km square in surface area. Each 5cm^2 pigeon hole houses a piece of paper, on which is written a 32bit binary word. The worker gibbons are trained to encrypt and decrypt the binary strings, as the binary is not regular binary, but is instead shuffled according to a complex mathematical hashing algorithm. Once the gibbon has decrypted and either memorised or modified and re-encrypted the binary, he scampers back to the messenger gibbon and using a proprietary gibbon dance, reports either a fail or a sucess in the operation, along with any data requested for a read operation.

    This all comes back up the chain to Ook, who has windows tell me that everything is fine.

    I'm sure you can't deny that it's as secure as all get out, and it's pretty much transparent apart from the half hour access times, which makes playing counter strike quite the bitch, but for your everyday Word and Email, it's perfect.

  28. Your information can be too secure by DDumitru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This type of discussion really worries me for "single owner" systems.

    You have setup a system that will keep people away from the data unless you and only you try to access this. What happens if something happens to you. Your family might need your account numbers if you die, have a stroke, etc.

    If you are protecting your child porn stash, then maybe this is the best solution. For things like credit card numbers, on-line banking, etc. you should "escrow" your passwords somewhere so that others can get to them if needed. This could be as simple as a printout of your passwords/accounts in your safe deposit box to having information kept by your lawyer.

    Remember that bad things can happen beyond just hackers trying to get data.

    And I am not just trolling for karma. My wife just had a friend die suddenly and one of the first questions from the family was "how do we get his laptops password". My anser was, "it depends, if he really secured it well, you are pretty much out of luck".

  29. Knoppix STD by Bruzer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Good topic. I wish there were more serious posts so the rest of us could gleam some knowledge from the replies instead of the geeks trying to be funny.

    We had a couple people leave work recently and they had some data in the computer that we needed to get ahold of. Since my company requires passwords and restrictive permissions on all Windows systems my team was worried that we might never get the docs off the systems.

    A co-worker got out the Knoppix security tools distribution ( http://www.knoppix-std.org/ ) CD and was able to bypass the Windows passwords very easily. And it read the hard drive ignoring windows permissions.

    If someone wanted a secure system. The Knoppix STD CD could be a good tool to use. Try and see if you or a trusted friend could get in to your PC.

    - Bruzer (trying to be constructive)

    --
    "Tempt not a desperate man" - Willy S.
  30. password... by Black+Perl · · Score: 5, Funny

    My password's set to my dog's name.

    My dog's name is currently 4$ter*Zf1, but I change it every 90 days.

    --
    bp
  31. Simple Practices by thed00d · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here are some simple policies I practice:
    1. Unless currently being used, the computer remains at an "off" state.
    2. Change your passwords often - how often is up to you, but be reasonable. I suggest 30 to 60 days for medium/low security, and 7 days for higher security. Remember, however, that any password can be breeched - it's just a matter of time.
    3. Segregate your network (if you have one) into zones. For Instance - You should not put your wireless access point straight off your network, instead, come off of your firewall in a new "wireless" zone. Terminate all wireless connection into your firewall via ipsec. Do not rely on WEP/WPA.
    4. Block all outbound and inbound ports on your firewall, until you need them. I.E, don't just open up port 80 because you /think/ that you /might/ just run a web server.
    5. Virus scanner.
    6. Password protect /does not/ imply encrypt.
    Anyway, these are just some basic concepts that are OS independent, and if your average user followed some of these guidelines, we'd all be in a better position.

    --
    http://www.accelerateglobalwarming.com
  32. BBC's "Micro Live" TV series by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The people who you would most expect to be smarter than the average idiot, well, turned out not to be. Perhaps their best physical access blunder was to keep the backup tapes of their website in the same room as their BBS server. I'm not sure if they ever found out who stole the computer, but they walked off with the backups as well.


    Of course, that's not the only blunder. A cracker under the name "The Cheshire Catalyst" broke into a network service they were demonstrating, and started piping songs onto the computer screen in the TV studio.


    These security breaches got the kind of publicity few crackers could ever hope to achieve today. A live television audience of maybe 7-8 million, and next to zero chance that the camera is going to pull away?


    One important lesson I learned, over these incidents, is that security is rarely accidental. Nor is it something you can consider seperately from the rest of the design. Designing something to be consistant and uniform means that errors will stick out like a sore thumb. In terms of security, or reliability, elegence is everything.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  33. 30 characters, omg by l3v1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    30 character password

    Now, that;s not paranoid, just plain stupid. Just imagine, early in the morning, quickly checking mail before tumbling out the door going to work, and I mistype 1 character: bamm, type again, mistype 1 character again: bamm, type again, ... [later:] bamm, fracking puter lands on the sidewalk.

    Why would someone do such a thing to oneself, being sane to a very minimal extent ? Buy a darn iris scanner, or fingerprint authentication stuff, whatever floats your boat. But 30 chars to type just to get into your spyware-house ? Get a life.

    Regarding the main question, i.e. being paranoid: one can efficiently and effectively protect even a Windows PC without becoming, well, posessed.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  34. Exactly why I don't post AC by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They look much harder at AC posts then us rambling registered users who normally have nothing interesting to say...

    There is no saftey in anonymity, only mediocrity. People are always looking to see who hides behind the mask even as they step over the unwashed masses. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. Removable media. by blanks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What the author did was serious overkill.

    The simple solution (for personal computers) is removeable media like a external USB harddrive. Connect it to your PC when you need to access sensitive information. Yes this dosent help if your system is all ready compromised, but if this has all ready happened chances are your fucked either way.

    This also works well with portable computers, but using memory sticks. if your in a insecure area (cafe) and need to leave your laptop for a few moments, just take the stick with you.

    It sounds like the author focused on securing his data only while hes not accessing it, like the encrypted data and silly long passord, but when hes all ready logged in, and the data is decrypted, your security is lossed. And the fact that most people leave their machines on (while logged in) this dosen't help in anyway.

    His computer is only secured while he is logged out, and his computer is turned off, but still not physicaly secure.

    Chances are if your in an enviorment that is not secure, this is your first mistake, and really if you have information that is this important, why the hell are you connecting that machine to the internet anyways.

  36. Paranoid?? used to be. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in my ol' hacking days I had 1 laptop that never EVER was in my house that all hacking was done with. it never had anything on it that could attach me to it (yes, I used gloves when handling it ALWAYS) and never EVER used floppies to store any of the information on it. Zenith minisport, it used 2 inch floppies so it was impossible to get more of them anyways.

    All my 'Sploits were on that machine and I never used it or hacked from in the town I lived in.

    This was all back when I was a wee one, and is my distant past. but I learned from some of the best (a friend was a 414 member) and one thing that was instilled in me was to be insanely paranoid.

    to the point that where I had the laptop stored I had ways of detecting if someone had been there.

    if it looked like someone was there abandon it and never EVER return.

    His father was Ex-CIA and he was one of the very few that were not nabbed when they took 414 down. no I never knew his real name and no I do not know where he is or have had any contact with him for over 20 years now.

    basically his help in telling me to be insanely paranoid kept me out of the law's hands until I finally grew out of it and left the illigitmate stuff for the other newbs. (note social engineering is far more fun and will nab you LEGITIMATE access to things, and it's a key talent that will get you very far in the corperate and business world... the ultimate hack is getting the sysadmin to give you an account.)

    things like installing back to back modems in offices you find access to their phone closet, (Man I had to have at least 8 of those around) tapping lines and installing outside line access and YES even making rubber handset couplers to couple a pair of payphones together for some 1200bps goodness that would make tracing you harder than hell. (put the modems in a box make the box cut power to both modems when it is opened so you know when someone discovers your redirect, that is a first warning that they are tracing you, telephone guys are clumsy and will start poking around back then, they never had any FBI agents that were well versed in telephone equipment until recently.. Using a telephone gear box to conceal your modems works best, and makiing it look like 10-11 phone lines enter that box also makes it more tempting to open it first.)

    SO basically, acting pretty much like a spy would, expecting danger at every turn and NEVER giving others information, espically not friends that od the same thing, is as paranoid as I was.

    it kept me from getting caught and out of Jail. although I never did anything illegal, nothing at all, I was a perfect student that did not even own a computer!

    I also have no idea who reprogrammed the Altairs in the computer lab to flash their led's in a cylon eye sweep!

    but oh man it looked so fricking cool!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  37. OpenBSD server by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a box dedicated to file storage only. I secure it in the following manner (well, in the process of doing so.)

    1. I run OpenBSD and know how to admin it. It runs ONLY SSH and Samba. It's behind a software router, runs pf.
    2. Samba will only be accessible on the loopback interface.
    3. Connections to the machine are made via SSH, you must have both a password and a PK authentication. The client has to port forward the appropriate ports for Samba to work.
    4. Firewall scrubs packets (prevents some potential TCP/IP exploit tricks)and only allows connections to and from my internal network and my machine at work from the outside.

    And that's it. I don't think this would work with more than one machine serving files via Samba, because of port forwarding. I haven't gotten the Samba attached to the local interface yet, right now samba is just limited to the single client I access files from via the firewall. I'd be curious if anyone has issues with the security of this setup. Basically, I want Samba, but with the stronger authentication and encryption of SSH.

  38. Latest corporate directives by Mantorp · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Please install these Kensington laptop locks and use them at all times." said the memo to all laptop users.
    I google for 2 minutes and find a great instructional video on how to open said laptop lock with a piece of paper and some tape.

    A few days go by, a new directive: "Please keep your laptop locked away in a drawer when you leave for the day."