Slashdot Mirror


China Bans 50 Games

Stargoat writes "The official mainland Chinese news agency, Xinhau, is reporting that China is banning 50 gaming titles. These titles include Battlefield Vietnam, The Sims 2, and FIFA 2005. A similar game banning event occurred six months ago in China, but not to this scale."

10 of 423 comments (clear)

  1. FIFA 2005 by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason I can figure that it's been banned would be if there is a Taiwanese team as an option.

  2. Piracy by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article says this is a crackdown on illegal games, and specifically mentions pirated versions of all the games listed in the summary.

  3. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really?

    From TFA:

    As part of the effort to protect intellectual property rights and create a good environment for Chinese youth

    It's most definitely at least partially censorship. The fact that they are banning several Vietnam War related games, which almost certainly show the Americans as the "good guys" and the communist North as the "bad guys", supports this idea.

  4. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by Jackhamr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought that /. might be having problems today. I read 8 comments before I saw one with MS bashing. That is almost a record.

  5. Re:Get a hint by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > Lawmakers - imagine what how other countries are using propaganda when you make laws against *EVIL* games. You may be making your country look more like a repressive communist society.

    By banning BFV, FIFA 2005, and Sims2, the Chinese are doing it to protect their society from the misconceptions that America was the "good guy" in Vietnam, from the notion that Taiwan is sufficiently independent to get a soccer team, and a game featuring characters that elevate their moods by "meditating" with pseudoscientific mysticism, see "ghosts", can enter same-sex relationships, and who frequently hop into a bed for pixelated "woo-hoo" -- the latter of which oughta be grounds for a ban in any civilized nation. But all three games are being banned for the same fundamental reason: they threaten the stability of the Chinese government.

    When our lawmakers do it, it's for the freedom and security of our children.

    40 years ago, Ted Kennedy had to leave his girlfriend to drown so he could continue defending our children's future. And the Senators from Disney probably had to snort a lot of cocaine from between a lot of plastic starlets' tits before deciding it was time to ban the internets.

    That's the difference between freedom and repressive communism. Honestly, we have no idea the sacrifices our lawmakers make for us.

  6. Re:I was wondering about that too by Trigun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's generic stuff that's no different in communist China from the USA.

    Like the idea of buying things for your family in order to placate them? Promoting mass consumerism as an effective way of life? Sounds like the Communist building blocks that the modern Chinese empire is founded on.
    (But it's probably because there is no official distrubitor of Maxis games as of yet, and all the games being retailled are pirated copies of varying quality)

  7. Governments are not concerned... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm more concerned about my kids getting run over by a tank because they disagree with the government, or contracting some fatal disease because the country runs around like nothing is wrong, than with textbooks, publications or journals.

    My friend, it is time to learn that all types of governments have one thing in common, and that is that they don't care about you in the slightest. They organize to use you for power. You don't even have a choice. There is only one thing that they do care about, and that is maintaining the special position that they have on top of you. This is the same the world over throughout history. I dare say it is inescapable.

    Whether it be a cultural dictatorship that seeks to keep you in line by giving you no options to think for yourself, or a "no real choice" representative democracy that has two parties that look the same, it doesn't matter what you think. Pull the lever, bucko. No matter what you do, no matter what they say about thinking about "your ethnic identity" or "your freedoms" they still will give most favored nation status to ethnic cleansing butchers and corporations that make plastic crap, because that's where the friends are (and by friends, I mean pieces of paper with other famously successful a-holes on it), and honestly, who could turn down that much oil and cheap labor? I mean, cmon! Remember, life is a video game where the objective is to rack up a bank account score with as many zeros as a galaga champion on a three day meth binge.

    Let me put it this way, your money (stamped with the very face of the kings that made the rules your life) has always been taken out of your hardworking hands and given to some bastard at the top to buy polo ponies. It's a graft... a fleecing of the many for the excess of the few, and their friends. Whether they are in charge of China, or getting seven hundred dollars for a special bolt for that aircraft carrier, or in charge of Citibank, in short, we play by their rules, and so they screw us, like they always have throughout history.

    Best to find a way make as much freedom, time, happiness, and peace on your own. If you look to those guys for it, you really will get run over by a tank, for their profit margins.

    1. Re:Governments are not concerned... by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 3, Insightful
      See the difference is that I'm working hard to be the guy buying the polo ponies.

      The delusion that this is possible is the reason capitalism works.

      You are correct that we enjoy more freedoms than many other countries. However, that doesn't make the the grandparent any less correct.

  8. Way, to go, /. by mrn121 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In a related story: Slashdot's credibility dropped another ten points today by means of yet another over-zealous printing of a story with little actual content.

    If you read the actual article, you will see, as many astute readers have pointed out, that this is an issue of China attempting to crack down on video game piracy, not ban games because they are evil communists.

    It is my opinion that recently slashdot has started down the slippery slope of becoming what I despise about big time news agencies: a marketplace for sensationalized stories. Every dramatic article posted on /. recently ends up being far less dramatic upon further investigation. I used to love slashdot for the lack of glitzy CNN-esque flash headlines of empty news articles, now slashdot is becoming exactly that.

    And don't give me that "well it's the readers who submit articles, so don't blame slashdot, blame the readers" crap. We all know how hard it is to get an article posted on the front page, and we all know that there are tons of articles submitted and only a few chosen by a handful of people who have their own ideologies/agendas. The only difference with having users submit the articles at this point is that the moderators don't have to dig up the articles themselves.

    If trends continue along these lines, I think my days of reading slashdot are numbered. I can read sensationalized news anywhere (CNN, FOXNews, ABC, CBS, NBC etc). I come here for the in-depth, interesting, non-glamorous, I-might-just-learn-something-today news, and I am finding it harder and harder to come across on slashdot.

    Mod this however you want. I might be a troll, but I feel like it needed to be said.

  9. Re:Sounds like a piracy crackdown, not a ban. by ThaReetLad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But unfortunately they don't really seem to care at the moment how their government treats them.
    Or at least they don't care enough about computer games to risk dying for.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine