Slashdot Mirror


Speakeasy Embraces Firefox

xdavexxx writes " Speakeasy, one of the largest DSL providers in the United States, recently announced that it will begin offering a specialized version of Mozilla Firefox to its customers. In doing so, they are one of the first internet companies to offer an official customized version of Firefox to its customers. This custom version of Firefox will keep the Firefox Google home page, but have the Speakeasy logo and feature a Speakeasy toolbar filled with links recommended by Speakeasy. No money was exchanged between the Mozilla Foundation and Speakeasy, as Firefox is open source and is freely available for use by anyone. Speakeasy's reasoning for this is simple; to increase the reliability and speed of its internet service." It should be pointed that Slashdot (and OSTG) have a partnership with Speakeasy.

69 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. SWEET! by 69sofine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hope more companies start doing that

    1. Re:SWEET! by essreenim · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm sure they will. In allot of the internet cafes I've been in in Dublin, you have a choice of IE, Opera or Firefox.

    2. Re:SWEET! by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, because I want my browser "recommending" links to me and plastering its logo all over the place.

      I hope *fewer* companies start doing this, and more companies make web sites that don't rely on IE "standards" to function properly.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  2. Branded by mboverload · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets just hope they keep the name Firefox somewhere on the program so they can tell their friends.

    1. Re:Branded by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the very least, let's hope this provides a critical mass which means that site operators have to deal with IE AND Firefox, rather than simply viewing FireFox as a negligable market.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    2. Re:Branded by windows · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've posted elsewhere that this idea isn't exactly new. A few years ago, Southwestern Bell was sending branded versions of Netscape Communicator to users who signed up for their service. It was clearly Netscape, however, and not branded to look like some SWBell browser. It just had a couple of modified pictures, including a chance to the splash screen when opening Netscape to indicate it had been distributed by SWBell. The splash screen, however, retained the Netscape logo. I'm assuming this same sort of thing is happening with Firefox.

    3. Re:Branded by Misch · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the download page, it looks like they're just offering a plugin that handles all the customization. Their download page points to here, and their plugin resides here.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    4. Re:Branded by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, don't worry, if the ISP's start switching browsers, firefox will become the marketleader. IIRC, once upon a time ISP's distributed netscape by default, IE made valiant inroads, and then the ISP's started bundling IE which led to a mad marketshare rush that left netscape a niche player. I think firefox is edging up to that marketshare tipping point now, where it's going to become the default browser to bundle with things, and thereby getting automatic installs on many, many machines.

      Though admittedly, there is much less reason to bundle a browser with your service/software nowadays, when every OS has a browser bundled in by default.

  3. Makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fewer Malware programs target FireFox, less security vulnerabilities, means less bandwidth is used by said malware and more by the actual customers.

    Kudos, Speakeasy.

    1. Re:Makes sense... by greechneb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but unfortunatly, even though firefox is superior software, eventually there will be spyware targeted to firefox. The spyware and malware writers aren't stupid, unfortunately, and they'll find any way to fool stupid users.

      I'm not saying it will ever be the epidemic IE has, but there will be some spyware that will fool users, whether it be a toolbar, or some other "add on" that sounds good to users.

      Build smarter mouse, someone builds a better mousetrap unfortunately.

    2. Re:Makes sense... by adamjaskie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that Firefox does not do ActiveX, so writing malware for it is that much more difficult. Possible, sure, but quite a bit more difficult.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    3. Re:Makes sense... by mboverload · · Score: 2, Informative

      The latest version now automaticly blocks that popup for any site other than the official one. You have to jump through a few hoops to install an XPI from an untrusted source.

    4. Re:Makes sense... by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but Firefox has XPI extentions. Granted, you have to whitelist to install, but there are stupid users out there.

    5. Re:Makes sense... by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While a nice thought, it's not really as safe as you'd like to believe. More than once already, I've seen a site pop up an XPI installer asking for permission. In one of those cases, someone else was at the keyboard and just clicked without missing a beat. Didn't read it or anything. Any browser with any sort of extension mechanism is vulnerable to people just OK'ing whatever they're asked and allowing the installation.

    6. Re:Makes sense... by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting point. And less badwidth used by malware == lesser costs for Speakeasy.

    7. Re:Makes sense... by araemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A bigger problem is when legitimate sites w/ activex that needs to be whitelisted have a 'support' page that recommends changing the security settings so that whitelisting is no longer necessary.

      I can't list any of these because I have not had to use an ActiveX control that required whitelisting since windows 98, but I have still seen these around.. "Change your security permissions from 'disable' to 'allow' or 'prompt' to make our site work." Rather than "Add our site to your trusted sites zone to make our site work."

    8. Re:Makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm guessing you aren't familiar with speakeasy? These are the people that offer the "SLASHDOT DSL" package. They *target* nerds, geeks, et cetera. Their tech support will walk you through installing bugmenot and adblock.....

  4. This isn't exactly new.... by windows · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This isn't exactly new. When I signed up for dialup service through Southwestern Bell back around 1996 or so, I was mailed a CD with Netscape Communicator 4 branded with SWBell logos. I wonder what took so long to have this done with Firefox. After all, Firefox can trace its roots to Netscape. It is good to see Firefox being embraced by a rather large ISP, however.

    1. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by mboverload · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Netscape paid them that time. This time it is because Firefox just plain rules. Even better, NO licensing to deal with, which makes Firefox an attractive option for any company distributing or recommending it.

  5. Good way to spread it by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many ISP customers just do exactly what their ISP tells them to. If this ISP starts shoving Firefox down customers' throats, Firefox market share could drastically increase over IE's.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    1. Re:Good way to spread it by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 2, Informative

      But Speakeasy isn't your normal ISP: I would say it's a geek's ISP because they offer things that a normal dsl user wouldn't think about like 2 static IP's, one-link service (no need for a dial tone), and most importantaly, no bandwidth caps: the bandwidth you buy is yours! It's great that Speakeasy is endorsing Firefox, but I suspect that their user base has a significant Firefox adoption rate already! Which is great, but I wish a SBC or Earthling would go this route too! Here's to hope! (Disclosure: I do subscribe to speakeasy one-link, and love it. Tell them Mixmastakooz sent you!)

    2. Re:Good way to spread it by hobbesx · · Score: 2, Funny
      You're not kidding. I once worked for a small ISP that had a picture of a mountain at the top of their homepage for years. The browser install software would set their page as the default page. It turns out that they had used a copyrighted image for the original webdesign, and replaced it with a different mountain picture. I couldn't believe the number of calls we got, complaining that 'the mountain is different', 'my mountain is gone', or 'I can tell that I'm not getting online, because the mountain doesn't look right'.


      The only time I've had that many calls about the webpage before, was the time we auto-redirected the main page through a random babelfish language. Nothing quite as fun as getting a call that claims the 'Net is broken, cause it's in Spanish.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  6. support calls by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Weenie: Good morning, Speakeasy Help Desk. How may I help you?
    User: Slashdot renders wrong in your ghey browser~()@*!@!(*
    Weenie: Ah, just ctrl-minus ctrl-plus.
    User: Woot! Thanks, mang!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:support calls by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      User: Slashdot renders wrong in your browser
      Weenie: Well Slashdot is idiot because they do not code to XHTML 1.1 Strict with CSS3 like everybody else does.
      User: Oh that makes sense then.
      Weenie: Please sign my Internet petition to force them to use valid web juice or I will boycott them.
      User: OK I'm hanging up now.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:support calls by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you've got a wheel-mouse, then you can hold control and roll the wheel forward then back.

    3. Re:support calls by naelurec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have been using the SlashFix extension and since installing, I have not had that issue anymore. hurray! :)

    4. Re:support calls by orasio · · Score: 2, Funny
  7. Ads? by wdd1040 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Links that Speakeasy chooses?

    As in their paid advertisers? What's next? Companies integrating spyware into Firefox and redistributing it?

    --
    wdd
  8. Wanted by dsginter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What we need is sort of what AOL was rumored to be doing with the next version of Netscape - IE integration. Before the flames start, hear me out.

    Some websites require IE right now. It would be nice for n00bs if they could use Firefox or any alternative browser without this worry. With an IE integration feature, we could amass a list of the websites that need IE rendering and Firefox could automatically render them with IE, if needed. Everything else gets Gecko. And maybe "the community" could put together an action team to help those on the list get off of the list.

    Perhaps there could be job creation involved, to boot.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Wanted by jimktrains · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a web programmer, it bothers the h*ll out of me to see something that says "This browser not supported." I have no trouble writting some complicated stuff that works in ALL browsers and platforms. I use standrd XHTML, CSS, and javascript. What annoys me is that IE doesn't support all sights... the "hover" midifyer in CSS doesn't work for anythign but a href's, not even jsut a tags, it must have an href. I mean geeze, jsut work. Firefox and Opera are my favorites to use. As for ActiveX, I never saw a need for it. I coudl always accomplish what I wanted to via a standard, excepted way.

      --
      "You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm." - S. G. Colette
    2. Re:Wanted by Secrity · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a modified form of the game of "Chicken". It would be a good thing if Firefox waits and sees whether it needs to lower itself to the level of the broken websites. Firefox is currently gaining market share. If Firefox stops gaining market share before the majority of the important IE only websites get fixed, then it would be necessary to make Firefox work with non-compliant websites. If Firefox gains sufficient market share without pandering to broken (IE only) websites, then the broken websites will have a strong incentive to work with standards based browsers. If Firefox panders to the broken websites, then the broken websites will have no incentive to fix themselves to work with standards based browsers

  9. speakeasy 7 by natedubbya · · Score: 2, Funny

    The name, speakeasy, was used 7 times in 6 sentences on this post. Try some shorter pronouns, I hope we don't charge by the letter.

  10. Re:And so it begins by geomon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And by that, I mean the security holes creaping in.

    That very well could be.

    The difference between IE and Firefox will be in how well they respond to the bugs that are found.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  11. Speakeasy by mboverload · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Speakeasy seems to be pretty in tune with the "geek/nerd" community. This shows they have smart managers or a persuasive IT department.

    Anyway, we should commend them greatly. Now we can say that ISP's even recommend it.

  12. Does Anyone Know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How they have modified it? Have they simply added their own set of extensions, sort of an "extension distribution", including a theme extension for branding purposes? Or, have they embedded part of the code in another "shell" of sorts? If so, what is the container technology, i.e. MFC/Java/C++, etc. Also, does this mean that it will be incompatible with Firefox, or at least not compatible with its extensions?

  13. This just in... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Microsoft has asked the BSA to investigate claims that Speakeasy is using software without proper licensing and in violation of several patents.

    Stay tuned for more on this story as it develops.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  14. support costs by confusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This probably makes a lot of sense from a support perspective. I've got to believe that most of the calls that support people get are related to the 397 spyware apps competing for keystrokes on the customer's computer.

    It problably also has to potential to cut down on spambots & other zombies residing on their network.

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

  15. You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If that's not in the slashdot FAQ, it should be.

  16. Re:Firefox by gandell · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So far they've been too adaptive for that. Until people embrace another OS in both the corporate environment and in the home, we're stuck with 'em.

    Back to the topic at hand, if pc venders such as HP or Dell would bulk it with their OS, and hide the Internet Explorer icon from the desktop, numbers might increase.
    I can see the average user wondering where the "internet" went, though...

    --
    Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
  17. Speakeasy is pretty good. by pyros · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to have DSL with them up in Minnesota. pricaes were pretty good and the plans were pretty flexible. Speed was pretty nice too (I lived like 1000 feet from the CO). But I tought their hosting plans were way overpriced.

  18. Re:Firefox by geomon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So far they've been too adaptive for that.

    They *were* adaptive until they had control of the marketplace. Now they dictate the standards and have very little incentive to innovate.

    Until people embrace another OS in both the corporate environment and in the home, we're stuck with 'em.

    That is correct. But large organizations that reach maturity in their marketplace get lethargic and develop so much bureaucratic momentum that when the change comes, it is usually fatal for the corporation. Only those with a good management structure can survive to keep themselves in the game (ala IBM).

    Back to the topic at hand, if pc venders such as HP or Dell would bulk it with their OS, and hide the Internet Explorer icon from the desktop, numbers might increase.

    I agree, but what do you think the odds are for that happening?

    I can see the average user wondering where the "internet" went, though...

    I think people who have been using the internet for more than 10 years are already saying that. Those who enter the system 2 years from now probably won't miss a thing.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  19. Re:Wrong place to start by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually by replacing IE they are pretty much ending the use of ActiveX over their network. Less 0wn3ed machines == less spam/zombies/what have you. It is proactive on their part.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  20. Options.. by aero2600-5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Speakeasy is wonderful because it's nice to have an option for DSL. If it wasn't for them, there would be no alternatives to Bellsouth other than cable in the area I live in. Now they're supporting Firefox. That just makes it all the better.

    Aero

    --
    Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  21. "Free" to use.. by wfberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No money was exchanged between the Mozilla Foundation and Speakeasy, as Firefox is open source and is freely available for use by anyone

    Although presumably they will have entered into some arrangement with the Foundation (or The Charlton Company), seeing as Firefox is a registered trademark. This is a good thing as it can prevent people spreading bastardized versions of firefox, such as Firefox Claria edition..

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:"Free" to use.. by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Presumably this is why they aren't offering their own build but a link to the regular firefox download page and an extension. Trademarks don't enter into it as they aren't actually distributing a browser.

      --
      Mod parent up!
  22. About Speakeasy in General by $criptah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love speakeasy. Since I switched to their service from AT&T, I have almost no unexplained downtime and no problems with customer support. Their support reps actually speak fluent English without annoying Indian accents and so far all my issues were resolved within a day and no support reps ever mislead me or gave me wrong info (happened with Verizon and AT&T quite often).

    Based on the packages that they offer and on cool things like wi-fi resell and open-server policies, it looks like the ISP is definitely for geeks. Also, I believe that if more ISPs provide users with free software that actually works, IE share will be reduced. 99% of non-techie users that I know use software provided by their ISPs. Anything from browsers to anti-virus programs. If things continue going this way, we'll see more open source products distributed to customers.

    I hope Speakeasy continues to do what it is doing and keep its level of customer support along with other innovative ideas that many companies seem to forget as soon as they become profitable.

  23. Hah hah by gandell · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yes, but unfortunatly, even though firefox is superior software, eventually there will be spyware targeted to firefox.

    Well, I'll show them if they do! I'll move to Mozilla...
    Oh, wait...

    --
    Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
  24. Tech Support will Help Promote by brandonp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds to me that calls to Tech Support will end up being a huge promotion effort for Mozilla Firefox. I'm sure Speakeasy will recommend many of it's troubled customers to download their customized version of Firefox.

    How many customers does this promotion extend to? I'm sure Firefox will be much closer to that 10% Internet usage mark.

    This is fun.

    Brandon Petersen

  25. It's a plugin by j2brown · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, I actaully followed one of the links. It's a plugin. The FF download it right from mozilla.org

    http://www.speakeasy.net/software/firefox/

    jeff
    sdg

  26. Re:Who cares? by stanleypane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your opinion is in complete disregard to the other 90% of users on the internet. There spigot is going to be spewing toxic waste into their house in no time at all. In turn, we all suffer.

  27. Recommended Links by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "... but have the Speakeasy logo and feature a Speakeasy toolbar filled with links recommended by Speakeasy. "

    By recommended, I'd assume sponsered links. But after checking they were actually legit links. I have seen other extensions that set their affliate codes, the last one i saw was the amazon search tool which tags all the search results with their affliate code.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  28. If only they embraced lower prices as well by melted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be all over their offerings. $39.95 is just too much for low-end ADSL these days. Everyone else is offering it for $29.95. They should at least throw in a fixed IP into the deal to make it attractive.

  29. From a support standpoint by gandell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't it be nice to answer all spyware calls with "I'm sorry, but we don't support Internet Explorer. Have you tried the firefox software that was bundled with your dsl?"

    --
    Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
  30. Should make it easier for corp. customization by raitchison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As it is unless you are willing to tweak the code and recompile you don't have a lot of options for customizing Firefox (at least not that I have found, I'd LOVE to be shown that it's doable). I think that corporations, that are struggling with spyware on a regular basis would be willing to switch to Firefox more readliy if they could easily tailor it to their needs, choosing default home page, links, install internal CA root certificates etc. For it's faults IE makes it pretty easy to do this, with the IEAK you can customize just about everything.

  31. Re:SWEET! (or shinola?) by turnstyle · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "hope more companies start doing that"

    Does that include:

    "This custom version of Firefox will have the Speakeasy logo and feature a Speakeasy toolbar filled with links recommended by Speakeasy. No money was exchanged between the Mozilla Foundation and Speakeasy, as Firefox is open source and is freely available for use by anyone."

    I know I'm old-fashioned, but I think coders should be paid for their work.

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  32. List of URLs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    >>>>>>drudgereport.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>kexp.org/<<<<<
    >>>>>>news.bbc.co.uk/<<<<<
    >>>>>>snopes.com/<<< <<
    >>>>>>steampowered.com<<<<<
    >>>>>>waste.sourc eforge.net/<<<<<
    >>>>>>world.altavista.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.achewood.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.alternet. org/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.ampednews.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>ww w.anandtech.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.apple.com/trailer s/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.applespecialists.com/<<<<<
    >>> >>>www.avault.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.cgonline.com/<< <<<
    >>>>>>www.craigslist.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.csn ation.net/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.dieselsweeties.com/<<<< <
    >>>>>>www.distrowatch.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.dnss tuff.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.ebay.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>ww w.esreality.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.fark.com/<<<<<
    > >>>>>www.filecloud.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.filecloud. com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.gamecloud.com<<<<<
    >>>>>>www .gamecloud.com/index.php?sect=network/map<<<<<
    >> >>>>www.gamedaemons.net<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.gamerankin gs.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.gamespot.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>> www.gotfrag.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.hammacher.com/<<< <<
    >>>>>>www.homestarrunner.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www. howstuffworks.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.imdb.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.kuow.org/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.littleradio.c om/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.livejournal.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>w ww.musicplasma.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.newegg.com/<<< <<
    >>>>>>www.ostg.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.pcgamer.co m/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.penny-arcade.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>w ww.pewfell.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.pitchforkmedia.com /<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.planetarion.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www .powellbooks.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.pricewatch.com/< <<<<
    >>>>>>www.pvponline.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.rad ioitg.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>>www.salon.com/<<<<<
    >>>>>> www.schlockmercenary.c

  33. Re:Firefox by peg0cjs · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is a chicken-and-egg effect. Developers will stop writing IE only pages when critical mass demands it. Until then, install the IEView extension & complain to your bank/post office/office supply store/whoever is writing non-standard html.

    I have personally converted both my wife (fairly tech-savvy but resistent to change) and mother-in-law (pretty low-tech), and both prefer Firefox hands down. The trick is:

    1. Install Firefox.
    2. Set it default and hide IE icon.
    3. Install a small handful of useful extensions.
    4. Give them the 10 second rundown.
    5. Everybody Profits!

    On the converting bad corporate citizens front, I am pleased to say that the last IE Only site I regularly visit (epost.ca) has re-coded to be standards compliant and now works fine in Firefox. When I complained to them 6 months ago, their initial response was "We code IE cuz 97% of our traffic uses it", but they eventually saw the light.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (Mainly due to Bill & Ted's Karma Adventure)
  34. Re:Wrong place to start by dooglio · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Where I work, our Internet guru bitches about Firefox (and Mozilla's) exclusion of ActiveX support by default. Only because that makes watching embedded WMV impossible (and we are all about video streaming).

    I would like to see ActiveX in FF only if it could be treated like extensions; .e.g. you only can download from trusted sites.

  35. Re:SWEET! (or shinola?) by shaitand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are paid for their work, in various ways, not the least of which is free code from their fellow developers.

    With luck Speakeasy will pay them with some free code as well.

  36. Good job, Timothy by justdisguyyaknow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thanks for disclosing the fact that OSTG has a relationship with the vendor it's promoting.

  37. Re:SWEET! (or shinola?) by swv3752 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you had RTFA, you would see that all Speakeasy has done is created a plugin. You still have to install the regular version of Firefox.

    And the Plugin just adds some bookmarks and change an icon or two (at least that is what they tell us).

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  38. Re:Purolator by Myen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of using JS (which can be turned off), maybe consider using IE's conditional comments? If you're just targetting IE anyway, that's ideal - no way to turn it off (AFAIK), and only works for IE-based browsers.

  39. Re:SWEET! (or shinola?) by njcoder · · Score: 2, Funny
    "I know I'm old-fashioned, but I think coders should be paid for their work."

    Yeah... write a letter to RMS, see if he'll put something that insures that in the next version of the GPL.

  40. Here's what's in the XPI by InvisiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://pctech.invisibill.net.nyud.net:8090/MySpeak easy.xpi/ has a copy of the XPI (http://www.speakeasy.net/software/MySpeakeasy.xpi ), all extracted out. http://pctech.invisibill.net.nyud.net:8090/MySpeak easy.xpi/chrome/speakeasy.jar/content/menu.xul seems to have all the new links, if that's what you want to check out. ThinkGeek, Fark, Snopes, Homestar Runner, AnandTech... Quite a variety.

  41. Re:Wrong place to start by dooglio · · Score: 2, Informative
  42. What it does: For those too lazy to look. by Dipster · · Score: 2, Informative
    The only difference I see is they added a "My Speakeasy" menu after "Help". Inside are some resources for their customers and a bunch of bookmarks to various sites.

    Interestingly enough, some of the sites that made the cut are OSTG, DistroWatch, ThinkGeek, and Newegg. Kinda odd for a plugin they're targeting at average users...

    Others include Wikipedia, Babelfish, an entire section of gameing sites, and some shopping sites.

    No Slashdot though...

  43. Re:SWEET! (or shinola?) by Neoncow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If Speakeasy is offically supporting Firefox, does that mean that they will provide technical support for their users?

    The logical answer is yes. Assuming they do so, Speakeasy is doing two important things for the Firefox devs.

    1. They are promoting the browser to the people who need it (Ie. customers with spyware issues).
    2. They are providing support for Firefox. Freeing up the community's time to persue other tasks (Ie. Developing Firefox)

    From what I understand, this is good for the Mozilla foundation.

  44. Re:Wrong place to start by apa666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I for one would like to see an open source video streaming format that works well in all the major browsers. There doesnt seem to be one ATM considering that whereever there is streaming content there is either Quicktime, Real or Windows Media. Perhaps this is an area where open source just cannot compete?

  45. Re:SWEET! (or shinola?) by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think coders should be paid for their work.

    Fortunately the coders for Firefox disagree with you.