Slashdot Mirror


Teen Sentenced for Releasing Variant of Blaster Worm

ScentCone writes "Minnesota teen Jeffrey Lee Parsons got a year and half for releasing a Blaster variant. The lightweight sentence was due, said the judge, to the parents' neglect. Quoting the judge: 'It's not a healthy thing to lock yourself in a room and create your own reality.' Which means most slashdotters basically have a get out of jail free card."

13 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. Not true by ActionJesus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I resent this sterotype that I "lock myself in my room and create my own reality".

    Im playing World of Warcraft: surely thats Blizzards trademarked reality?

    1. Re:Not true by packeteer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No Kidding...

      I used to read slashdot a lot. I have over 1000 posts, Karma bonus, I have had articles submitted. But i NEVER read slashdot anymore. Its not becuase i dont enjoy it. Its becuasei play WoW all the time im on my computer. Why am i here typing this up right now then if i never read slashdot. Well becuase there is a que to connect the the server. Well time to go check to see if i can go back to my reality.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  2. Community Chest? by MorboNixon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'It's not a healthy thing to lock yourself in a room and create your own reality.' Which means most slashdotters basically have a get out of jail free card."

    Don't you mean a "locked yourself into jail already" card?

  3. kidding by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why didn't his parents get some time in the klink, if they're contributory in their neglect? And why does "try a child as an adult" make any sense at all? He was 17 when committed the crimes - the "child" treatment acknowledges that children have a chance to learn from their corrections *differently* than adults, for whom it's usually too late to form their social attitudes. Children can be educated, while adults usually must be intimidated with punishment. Kids don't get "mercy" because we're "nice"; they get different treatment because it works better on them, with less cost and risk to us. Meanwhile, the adults at Microsoft, who wrote the malware that his Blaster exploited, have learned that Microsoft profits from security holes, and we'll never see the end of them.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  4. Partly the parents' fault? by CTO1 · · Score: 5, Funny
    What were they supposed to do?

    "Jeffrey Lee! Stop writing malicious code and get a life!"

    "And take out the trash!"

  5. Well I try! by cybersaga · · Score: 5, Funny

    I try to lock myself in a room with my computer, but my wife keeps getting in.

  6. 18 months in jail != out of jail by realdpk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When did Slashdot math change it so 18 months in jail is like getting no jail at all?

    "He will still have to pay restitution to Microsoft and to people whose commuters were affected in an amount to be determined at a hearing set for Feb. 10."

    "The judge imposed three years of supervised release following his prison term, during which Parson can only use computers for business and education - not video games or file-sharing or hacking."

    Come on. He's not getting off easy. He didn't do anything irrepairable, why would more jail time change things?

    1. Re:18 months in jail != out of jail by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think 18 months is more time than he deserves, he was stupid yes, but when this young, giving them years to life in prison does nothing but makes citizens fund his imprisonment, and create a useless person that can't give back to society.

      If we looked at this at the cost of putting someone in jail for nonviolent crimes, and had him on probation doing community service, community service would win out. He could serve his time while going to school, much better for everyone.

      We are not only trying to punish them, but also rehabilitate them. Which by all accounts, using the death penalty as an example, criminals will do criminal activity no matter what the punishment.

      Our legal system is broke, and people are paying for it. The cost of law enforcement vs prison is really out of balance. Of course, Texas has turned prison into a money making business, which should show how absurd the whole thing is.

      Kids still do stupid stuff, and writing viruses seem to be something kids do. Same as smoking pot, nothing is going to change if we put everyone in prison, other than making a prison state.

      Non-violent criminals should be treated different, and then circumstances taken into account. Stealing excluded.

  7. It doesn't seem fair to me by parrillada · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kids do stupid things. I know I did my fair share of stupid things when I was younger. Now I consider myself a highly moral, good standing citizen of society, with great future prospects. But if I had been put in jail for one of the silly things I did when I was younger, my life today would probably be a disaster, and to society's detriment.

  8. Re:Goin Up Da River by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 5, Funny

    18 months sucks from a loss of life perspective, but you won't be totally obsolete when you get out.

    1. The Web will still not even have even half the sites HTML 4 compliant, XHTML compliant sites will still be less than 10% at best.
    2. Java will still be slow, cumbersome and buggy. Most Java programs will still abort with exceptions (what good is exception handling if you just crash) much of the time.
    3. GNOME will still be siphoning mindshare from KDE. (the license wars are over, join forces with KDE already!)
    4. Software will still be bloated.
    5. CPUs will just be faster versions of the ones today, but never fast enough.
    6. Apple will still be expensive, Apple users will still be elitist.
    7. There will still be plenty of lawsuits going on.
    8. Same with patents.
    9. IPv6 still won't be available to most of the Internet.
    10. People will still worship XML and web services, but not actually have a use for them.
    11. There will still be many sites which only work in IE.
    12. There will still be many sites that need Active X.
    13. Same for windows only plugins.

    Mid 2006 will be a lot like today.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  9. Re:Parents need more legal liability by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't understand squirting out some kids and then letting them run rampant and not having any responsibility for a minor's actions.

    First off, he's 17, and is an adult in most ways that count. At 17, he can't really hide behind the shield of your parents. He should be held responsible for most or all of his actions.

    Secondly, I doubt his parents would realize he was making a virus even if they were looking. As far as they probably knew, he was programming, learning computers. He didn't get busted for drugs or playing with guns, which means his parents were doing something right.

    Obviously they weren't perfect parents, but no parents are perfect.

  10. Re:Parents need more legal liability by loucura! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I doubt his parents would realize he was making a virus even if they were looking.

    He used a hex editor to change the name of the virus and put his "handle" in. That's it. He didn't write a variant of the blaster worm, he changed a couple strings in a binary.

    --
    Black and grey are both shades of white.
  11. Re:Parents need more legal liability by gfody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what exactly did he do to "release it to 40,000 computers".. it's a worm. he modified the copy that infected his machine and it went on doing what it does. Had he not done that 40,000 computers would still have been infected just not with his modified version.

    He probably took too much credit for it thinking he wasn't going to get caught. If he had a better lawyer he probably could've walked clean

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.