Slashdot Mirror


New Legal Center for Open Source Projects

NW writes "According to a News.com story well known OSS lawyers Lawrence Lessig and Eben Moglen are launching a new "Software Freedom Legal Center" to assist open source developers with legal issues for free." You can view the website at Softwarefreedom.org.

93 comments

  1. [tt] Good by daniil · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wouldn't want someone like ESR or your typical Slashdotter representing them in the court :7

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:[tt] Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [tt] stands for Troll Tuesday.

  2. They Better Check with Cedant First by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Before they come out and say that they have patented the process of offering free advice like they did with Amazon and recommending books!

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  3. Re:Dear Professor Linux, by faragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dear François, Your IP will be treated with a deep love, as usual. IP-banning was, and will continue, due to the fact that we love both you and your IP. There's nothing related to money. Kind regards, Another one Anonymous Coward

  4. for free? by essreenim · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    to assist open source developers with legal issues for free."

    Who's paying the lawyers to work for free ; )

    sorry couldn't resist.

    1. Re:for free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the OSDL is bankrolling the effort.

    2. Re:for free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who's paying the lawyers to work for free ; )

      I think TFA said OSDL is paying them $4 million - which means founding members "IBM, HP, CA, Intel, and NEC" and a large bunch of othercompanies that dependn on open source are paying them.

      (flamebait? It was a very good question! And it's nice to see widespread industry backing of these services)

    3. Re:for free? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Well the catch is... it's free up until you end up looking at exhibit A. At that point, the code analysis will not be up to the lawyer. That's for sure.

    4. Re:for free? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1

      What, lawyers can't understand code? Please. I will graduate from law school in May and I am perfectly capable of understanding code. You see, before we can get in to law school, we have to get at least a bachelors degree. Some of us, like myself, have degrees in computer science. I may not be a regular contributor to the Linux kernel, but I am more than capable of parsing and understanding code. Granted, that won't always be the best use of my time as an attorney, but not every case is SCO v. IBM and not every case will require super secret code analysts from MIT.

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    5. Re:for free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      flamebait? It was a very good question!

      I agree but for a different reason. Free Software expects developers to work for free. So why shouldn't the lawyers be expected to work for free?

      It only seems fair.

    6. Re:for free? by emrysk · · Score: 1

      Because it's impractical. Besides, there are many OSS/FS developers who are paid for their work (Novell employees, for instance).

    7. Re:for free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing impractical about expecting the lawyers to work for free. They could do it in their spare time just like the free software developers do. Is it realistic that they will? Of course not.

      Yes, some free software developers are paid but the vast majority of them are not.

  5. Too late. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    IBM could have used these guys against SCO and saved a fortune.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Too late. by cg0def · · Score: 1

      No they could have not. IBM is not and OSS project and they do not qualify for the help of this center. Also I doubt it that IBM would have choset to go this way even if it had enough power and was suited for the purpose. After all IBM is still a closed source company even though they opened 600 patents. Hey, 600 patents is a drop in the sea when IBM filed for over 2300 patents just last year.

    2. Re:Too late. by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      I'm going to start a foundation to help the humor-impaired. You most certainly would qualify for one of our grants.

    3. Re:Too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, not really free; since they're a large sponsor of OSDL who is a large sponser of this organization... so they'd be paying anyway.

      Though I suppose it could have distributed the costs around.

  6. Well....atleast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    opensource freedom is "on the march".

  7. Great News by Broadcatch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Eben's a great guy is certainly a David against many Goliaths. Glad to hear about the Software Freedom Law Center! He has his work cut out for him in updating the GPL as there are many IP issues that will need to get worked out with the BigCos that regularly use and/or distribute GPL'd software. Glad to see he's getting some help from people like Weitzner and Lessig (don't know Diane Peters, but I'm sure she's good).

    --

    The antidote for misuse of freedom of speech is more freedom of speech.
    -- Molly Ivins

    1. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how good is she? how is she good? *wink wink* i had her last night.... she wasn't that good. haha

  8. The catch...? by Thijs+van+As · · Score: 0

    So... what's the catch?
    This couldn't be all charity, or...

  9. It's a great start by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Though I cannot see how much trial work a staff of 4 will be able to handle. One major suit could tie them all up.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:It's a great start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least 2 of them, Moglen and Lessig, are law professors, so they have at their disposal vast numbers of law student volunteers and research assistants. Not much help for actual litigation, but they can do large amounts of research grunt work.

    2. Re:It's a great start by Wordsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least if there's a major suit, there's now a dedicated staff of four to help. When America sees a DVD-Jon, these guys could come in handy.

    3. Re:It's a great start by john_anderson_ii · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not really in the know when it comes to leagal offices, but in the medical profession there are a small army of nurses, technicians, and residents for every doctor on staff. It's probably the same thing on the law side.

      --
      Be Safe! Sleep with a Marine. Semper Fi!
    4. Re:It's a great start by jamienk · · Score: 1

      But the staff of four includes Eben Moglen and Lawrence Lessig. These guys are TOPS. I'm sure they would make fine Supreme Court justices even.

    5. Re:It's a great start by morleron · · Score: 1

      I suspect that, as with the EFF and other organizations, the number of available attorneys is not necessarily reflected by the number of staff. I suspect that Prof. Moglen and friends have put together a list of attorneys who are willing to do pro-bono work for the Center. I know that all of us have our favorite lawyer jokes, but there are still a few that do work for the public good, whether or not that work is remunerative.

      If you're concerned about the number of lawyers and other resources available to the SFLC send them some money. I'm sure that they'll put it to good use.

      Just my $.02,
      Ron

      --
      Impeach Barack Obama for violating the Constitutional requirement to be a "natural born" citizen to hold the office of P
  10. They aren't doing it for free... by hsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I doubt it is with all free intentions. Lawyers are required to do a certain amount of probono work a year, maybe this is their segment of it? Granted it is a great idea and will help many people, I doubt they have the resources to fight lengthly big battles for OSS.

    but a little legal help is better than none.

    1. Re:They aren't doing it for free... by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Anything's got to be better than all of the IANAL posts you typicially get here in a legal situation :)

    2. Re:They aren't doing it for free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er.. do you even know who Lawrence Lessig is?

    3. Re:They aren't doing it for free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they probably are doing it for free. If you read their press release they are being funded with $4 million in seed money from Open Source Development Labs (OSDL), "a global consortium dedicated to accelerating the adoption of Linux®". So they probably will not be charging for the cases or issues they will take on. (Although they may still take a slice of any winnings as legal fees)

    4. Re:They aren't doing it for free... by oirtemed · · Score: 1

      "free intentions"? I think we can trust Lessig's intentions. As far as pro-bono...that doesn't make it any less of a contribution. According to the ABA Rule 6.1, the amount of hours of public service is 50 a year. Now obviously that is a week's worth of work, but I believe these guys will probably putting even more into it as well. I love that the ABA promotes probono, does the Medical Association do the same? Just wondering cause I really don't know.

    5. Re:They aren't doing it for free... by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Hospitals routinely eat the costs of uninsured patients. I believe there are
      laws that make it illegal for a hospital to refuse necessary care based on
      whether or not the patient is insured or not (read: can pay or not).

      Perhaps someone in search of karma can hunt down some links that explain
      the legal obligations of Hospitals in this regard.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
  11. Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting


    or Indian law, or Turkish law ? or British law ? or French law ? or Nepalese law ? or Danish law or or or....

    or is "free software" exclusively an American thing now ?

    hello Americans there is a whole world out there so stop hijacking words and understand that free software is a global thing , the sooner you get it the better for everybody

    1. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you stupid? Are you? Did you even RTFA?

      How could you criticize something that is designed to help people.

      Are IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Intel "American" companies? I'm pretty sure they are actually multi-national, and probably have experience with legal issues in other countries.

      Moron.

    2. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so where in the article does it say they will deal with international legal issues ? oh yeah
      it doesn't , this is just to help American developers, good for them but i doubt they will be any use to a developer in Bengal who has legal problems in his country with his "free software"

      dumbfuck

    3. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, rather than being glad they are starting to provide a free service you whine that it's not already worldwide! Law is not Lord of the Rings.

    4. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 0, Troll

      No you're the dumbfuck.

      You come on here and bitch and moan that this particular group is only going to help with American legal issues. What's your point? You don't even know that to be true. You just come on here and run your AC mouth; words with no substance.

      How can this be seen as a bad thing? Perhaps it will inspire some companies and lawyers in Bengal (wherever the fuck that is) to start a similar organization.

      But, you'd rather come here and diarrhea out your mouth with some sort of anti-American gibberish. Get a clue.

    5. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Oh spare us the whining and the condescension. "Hijacking" words? I was going to post a rebuttal to that idiotic proposition but I suddenly realized I shouldn't waste my time responding. So I'll play along, yes, we're hijacking words, and you're going to sit there and take it because you can't do anything about it.

    6. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, but the mods mark this as "Interesting" and the first reply as "Troll" even though it's actually the other way around.

      I guess common sense is short in supply around here.

    7. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Ironsides · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      hello Americans there is a whole world out there so stop hijacking words and understand that free software is a global thing , the sooner you get it the better for everybody

      And why do dumb fucks like you keep trying to read more into an anouncement than people are actually saying. What part of that anouncement states that they are a "world" protection or anything of the sort. Cause I shure as hell didn't read it. As for "free software" exclusively an American thing now ? I don know where the fuck you got this from but you might as post the link since it sure as hell wasn't he same article I read. The foundation was set up in the US to protect NPOs from Software Patents in the US. Quit trying to read more into it than is actually there. And quit assuming that no one in the US doesn't know about the rest of the world. As for you comments? You show equal ignorance by using "Americans" which applys to anyone in the western hemisphere seeing as how everyone there is in "the Americas". So stop wasting your breath.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    8. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wherever the fuck that is
      haha thanks for proving the point

    9. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I admit it, I didn't know off the top of my head where Bengal is. I do know where Calcutta is, just didn't know the relation.

      What's funny is that the number 1 google result for Bengal is The International Bengal Cat Society.

      So after some digging down in the result list, I learn that it's in India and is the state whose capital I know as Calcutta---and has a literacy rate of 57.7%.

    10. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amikor valaki ilyen modortalan hulyesegeket ir, azt kivanom barcsak ne hordoznak magyarsagukat a nick-jukon.

      Szomoru.

    11. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So globally, more people are interested in Bengal Cats than in Bengal, India. That's funny.

    12. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 1

      Well, my real name is Levente, what do you expect?

    13. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You show equal ignorance by using "Americans" which applys to anyone in the western hemisphere seeing as how everyone there is in "the Americas"."

      Can you say "Europe"?

      Get a clue.

      The poster is annoyed because if this organisation was working in any other country it would be stated as such in the title.

      "And quit assuming that no one in the US doesn't know about the rest of the world."
      Agreed, but you should also understand that most Americans come accross as if they don't.

      "Quit trying to read more into it than is actually there."

      This is the problem. The information isn't there (in the title).

      "So stop wasting your breath."

      Please, stop wasting your over-reactions.

    14. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I do agree with you. Not sure where the parent poster is getting "hijacking" from. Does the poster mean to say that no one can legally represent a person/group concerning free software unless they deal with all forms of law in the world?

      Yes, "Americans" can mean "anyone in the western hemisphere" since that consists of North America, Central America, and South America. However, do Mexicans, Canadians, or Brazillians refer to themselves as Americans? (I'm just curious). Technically "Americans" can mean anyone in the west hemisphere, but it's not used that way in practice.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    15. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by perp · · Score: 1
      Yes, "Americans" can mean "anyone in the western hemisphere" since that consists of North America, Central America, and South America. However, do Mexicans, Canadians, or Brazillians refer to themselves as Americans? (I'm just curious). Technically "Americans" can mean anyone in the west hemisphere, but it's not used that way in practice.

      Though I agree that "American" can be interpreted to mean "from/of the Americas" (and it is used that way in biology), it is NOT generally used that way to refer to people anywhere in the Americas. No Canadians would refer to themselves as Americans, nor would we refer to citizens of any other western hemisphere country (except the United States, of course) as Americans.

      --
      There are two kinds of sysadmins: paranoids and losers. I'm both kinds.
    16. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1
      it is NOT generally used that way to refer to people anywhere in the Americas.

      That is exactly my point in the original post. "American" can be interpreted that way, but as I said, "it's not used that way in practice."

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    17. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      You show equal ignorance by using "Americans" which applys to anyone in the western hemisphere seeing as how everyone there is in "the Americas". So stop wasting your breath.

      Actually, for some reason I do recall that the term "American" was implied (since my childhood by otheer Americans) to mean only those born in the US of A. Maybe I was just educated stupid just like all the other Americans... Oh wait...

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    18. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "No Canadians would refer to themselves as Americans...."

      That's for the same reason you might be quick to distinguish yourself from someone else carrying your name: "Heh, uh, no not THAT Trump. NO relation. In fact, I mostly use my mother's name Gnizprtzky. It's just easier."

      Somewhat related: The following appeared in a 1970s edition of National Lampoon entitled 'Canada - The Retarded Giant on our Doorstep':

      Q: Why is Canada always pink on the map?

      A: From embarrassment

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    19. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that a Turkish name ? Perhaps your origin is from the part of eastern europe that was under the Turkish Ottoman empire ? Not that it matters because you are not going to get mucg free advice in hungarian from these FSF lawyers. And oh, by the way, there are more people from "India" or "Bengal" than lousy Hungarians driving the US tech industry but then you never got out of your cave anyway.

    20. Re:Do they deal with Korean law ? by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 1

      ??? Uh, no--it's Hungarian. Levente was Arpad's son (Magyar).

      And, I was actually born in the USA. While I don't know much about caves per se, I do know all about your H1Bs and how the quality of software and support provided by "Aknad" is about the same quality as the average mud-hut in Bengal.

  12. what about by mottie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "to assist open source developers with legal issues for free"

    now all we need is someone that work for free to go after people that abuse the GPL

    ie: Sveasoft (http://slashdot.org/~Featureless/journal/ )

    1. Re:what about by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Hello, I read some of the information about the link you posted and all that Linksys firmware thing. I think this question is aimed for TheIndividual, why bother fighting with this Sveasoft?

      You know, that WRT54G firmware is Free Open Software, isn't it easier to get the last version and just create a fork, and improve it, at the end, people will have the option of "suscribing" to Sveasoft to download its "version" or just going to the page where the Open version is and download it.

      what do you think?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how bout a big guy named Brono to go around and mess 'em up

    3. Re:what about by sepluv · · Score: 1

      I think "go[ing] after people that abuse the GPL" counts as "assist[ing] open source developers with legal issues". I cannot see anything on their WWW site saying that they only do defence work.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  13. Re:Dear Professor Linux, by faragon · · Score: 1

    Buddie, some people doesn't understand your humor sense. Err, wait, I trapped myself talking to myself *again*. I will finish my autoconversation in other ocasion, better ran to visit the psycoanalyst. Sorry for the inconvenience. Arg! Dub dub.

  14. Also by spellraiser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free Software Foundation founder Richard Stallman is working to update the General Public License (GPL) that governs Linux and hundreds of other open-source projects. The law center said it will help with that work.

    A crucial task, in my opinion. More specifially, Stallman and co. are planning to protect GPL code better legally from the threat of patent litigation. Software patents are a relatively recent, and (in the opinion of many, including myself) harmful phenomenon. Updating the GPL to somehow lessen their potential impact on Free Software would be a major accomplishment.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  15. A little off-topic, but. by The+Grey+Clone · · Score: 1

    Are there any legal centers for Open projects that aren't software? Has anyone even taken on a project such as an openbook or openmusic? I believe Lessig has released a book under a CC licence, but are there any others?

  16. Public Domain by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 1

    The first thing they should post is a detailed explanation of why nobody releases software into the public domain.

    1. Re:Public Domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its in the public domain anybody can incorporate it in their software without any problem. if you gpl it... well read up on that on any number of other posts here. I'm sure it wouldn't be that hard....

    2. Re:Public Domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Exactly...

      PD is true freedom, it's true generosity, it's true love of the art, it's true advancement of the science.

      GPL is still working for free, yet making your code to hard to use as to scare most people away from touching it.

      Even if you are writing code 10 lib levels away from some tiny GPLed thing that you didn't even know about, you are still infected. Developing code on Linux is a lot like a doctor working on an ebola patient. No matter how careful you are, you stand a good chance of succuming.

    3. Re:Public Domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh, no it's not.

      PD is anarchy; and ultimately benefits the largest manufacturing organizations. GPL preserves the freedom.

    4. Re:Public Domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. If you were a lawyer and you gave advice like that you would be at risk for disbarment.

    5. Re:Public Domain by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt. Wrong.

      The reason nobody releases software in the public domain is that it would expose them to liability for bugs found in it. You can't make use of it depend on acknowledging the lack of
      warranty etc. if in fact anybody can use it without restriction.

  17. off topic question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is there a "public defender's office"... why don't they just have all defense attorneys in the public defenders pool? Your number comes up you do it no questions asked.

    1. Re:off topic question: by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      why is there a "public defender's office"... why don't they just have all defense attorneys in the public defenders pool? Your number comes up you do it no questions asked.

      Because the 6th amendment* in the bill of rights only covers criminal trials, not civil trials. I assume that most open source cases are civil matters.

      *Yes, I intentionally made this US centric since that was the subject of the article.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  18. Look at all the wankers flaming you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems you have touched a nerve with those freedom lovers

    perhaps the website would be better named
    http://www.softwarefreedom.us

    as .org is a bit ambigious
    so to clarify they only offer protection in USA to US developers from US legal issues

  19. Lessig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is having Lessig on board a good thing? Has he ever won a case? I stopped following his blog after he started to wig-out over the 2004 election. And I find his message harder to relate to. Stallman, etc. are focused on *creating* new Free Software, not trying to get free access to previously copyrighted work (which seems to be the message of Lessig's two latest books). That's a much harder flag to rally around IMHO. (Yeah, I'm well aware of CC). He also seems to be to much of a do-gooder. What's the point of having a lawyer if he's not going to draw from the lawyer's little bag of dirty tricks? (There's a reason people don't like lawyers.)

  20. We anticipate eagerly the first anti-GPL work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    done when they defend some non-GPL open source project against an alleged GPL violation.

  21. Why on earth is this insightful??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a rubbish excuse for an insult at best!
    Come on mods, do your job.

  22. Re:Dear Professor Linux, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you're really stupid, aren't you?

  23. Re:Dear Professor Linux, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but at the momen of writing above comments I was a bit bored... I had the need to smile a bit.

  24. Re:they deal with Korean law? Speaking of ignoranc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >show equal ignorance by using "Americans"
    >which applys to anyone in the western
    > hemisphere seeing as how everyone there is
    > in "the Americas".
    Beautiful, and they say our daycares dont teach children anything.
    You remind me of elementary school kids who find out that we are homo sapiens and who just have to share that knowledge.

    Yes Sherlock...we know about the Americas but not knowing the context in which 99.99% of the people use 'americans' shows either astounding ignorance or youre just trying to one up the previous whiner with trivial trivia.
    Bravo. Now go back to Jeopardy.

    >So stop wasting your breath.
    Just hold yours for a few minutes.

    terry

  25. Do these guys know what they're doing? by domovoyny · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice that none of the lawyers on that site have any technical experience? It's all wonderful to talk about patents from the point of view of "legal" freedoms and history, but our world is a little more complicated than that.

    Yet another bunch of "Intellectual Property" lawyers that aren't even admitted to practice before the US Patents and Trademarks office.

    1. Re:Do these guys know what they're doing? by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Did anyone notice that none of the lawyers on that site have any technical experience?

      Since when does everyone need to have ultra l33t tech skills to analyze the matters of law and fact that apply to a given technical situation? That's like saying insurance agents are not qualified to analyze the legal questions of car accidents because they don't understand how to install an intake manifold.

    2. Re:Do these guys know what they're doing? by dkusters · · Score: 1

      First, "admitted to practice before the US Patents and Trademark office" isn't what it sounds like. All this certification gives you is the ability to write patents. That's it. You can still litigate, license, attack, etc. patents.

      Second, just because you have technical experience doesn't mean you qualify to practice before the USPTO. For example, I will be an IP lawyer in less than 9 months (thank God it's almost over!). Before law school, I was a software engineer for over 6 years. I know software. But, I don't qualify to write patents because I was self-taught and my undergrad degree wasn't in Computer Science.

  26. Ah, bigotry, stereotypes, and bad geography by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    "You show equal ignorance by using "Americans" which applys to anyone in the western hemisphere seeing as how everyone there is in "the Americas"."

    Europe is generally in what is considered the "Eastern Hemisphere." Unless Europeans are working from a different definition than those of us in the Americas.

    And here I thought the stereotype was that Americans didn't know geography.

    Agreed, but you should also understand that most Americans come accross as if they don't.

    Ah, more stereotyping. I think you are watching far too much television, rather than seeing the real world. Many Americans are idiots. So are many Europeans (I ran into one example while seeing my girlfreind off at the airport, an arrogant Dutch prick who shoved his way -- literally, by physical force -- into the queue in front of us. I would have enjoyed watching him experience the consiquences of such behavior had he done something like that on the south side of Chicago, but I digress).

    Certainly we have an imbecel for president, but let's not forget that Europe has turned out its fair share of imbecellic leaders as well, and while I will grant you ours is far worse than those in Europe at this time, I doubt Europeans' intelligence suddenly tripled the moment you got rid of Margaret Thatcher, Franco, or Milosevic, nor did ours suddenly plummet when Baby Bush stole the first election and organized the dumbest of the dumb through bigotry (may Our Lord and Savior(tm) keep the gays out of the churches!) and fear ("9/11, 9/11, 9/11, terrorist, terrorist, "god bless America(tm)).

    It's annoying have an ignoramous as a leader humiliating the country abroad at every turn, but I imagine you'll get to experience that in your country at some point, if you haven't already. It is an unfortunate aspect of allowing the vote of the dumbest, most ignorant person to count equally with that of the smartest, most well educated, and the fact that half the population is by defition "below average" in intelligence and knowledge of current events, and is more likely to vote how the media manipulates them than how a reasoned, thoughtful consideration of the facts would suggest.

    My experience, having lived on both continents, is that by and large people are equally as knowledgable, and equally as ignorant, equally as bigoted, equally as idealistic, and equally as mistaken about those across the sea on both sides of the pond.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Ah, bigotry, stereotypes, and bad geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Western hemisphere (PDF I'm afraid)
      Yes, western european countries (including the UK which is where I live) are part of the western hemisphere. This is all I meant.

      Ah, more stereotyping. I think you are watching far too much television, rather than seeing the real world.
      Yes, I was purposefully using the stereotype to make a point. This is what much of the non-US world sees of Americans. The dumbed down, self-indulgent stereotype. Please understand, I was not calling all Americans or even the majority stupid or self-centered. I was mearly pointing out the perception that many people over the pond have.

      I would have enjoyed watching him experience the consiquences of such behavior had he done something like that on the south side of Chicago
      So would I ;-) I hate rude people.

      but let's not forget that Europe has turned out its fair share of imbecellic leaders as well
      Come meet Tony Blair. He's not as daft as he appears but he's silly enough to play lap dog to Mr George Bush. No world leader should brown nose another.

      My experience, having lived on both continents, is that by and large people are equally as knowledgable, and equally as ignorant, equally as bigoted, equally as idealistic, and equally as mistaken about those across the sea on both sides of the pond.
      Again, I would personally agree with you, but there are many who are tired of what they see of America. (See your comment about TV).
      It doesn't help having people getting up in arms on /. everytime an anti-american comment is made. The post that I was originally replying to was an over-reaction to a simple observation: many stories only affecting a single country get posted as if they affected everybody here. Sure, it's good news that there's free legal help for free software in America, but that's what it is: Free legal aid for free software in America.

  27. how many cases? by torrents · · Score: 1

    cases dealing with software (ip, facilitating piracy, and patents) can be extremely complex... how much can these guys possibly handle at one time?

    --
    Get your torrents...
  28. and this happens shortly after ... by zeruch · · Score: 1

    ..Open Bar opens its doors. It's founded by current Montavista counsel Jason Wacha and ex-VA Legal VP Gwyn Murray. Mozilla's Mitchell Baker is also involved. Looks like there is finally some more activity to build a more focused effort on legal issues rather than just a lot of IANAL threads in /.