Slashdot Mirror


Halo Movie Script in the Works

Alex Garland, the writer of the script for 28 Days Later, has been retained to pen a script for a Halo movie. Voodoo Extreme has the story via Variety, and notes that Microsoft is keeping close creative control over the script writing process.

65 comments

  1. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as Uwe Boll isn't involved, it's all good.

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Can you please explain what all the buzz is lately with the zerg?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  2. Oh Goody! by XopherMV · · Score: 1, Troll

    Maybe it'll be as good as the Street Fighter or Super Mario Brothers movies!

    When will they learn that video games do not have enough plot to transform into a 90 minute movie?

    1. Re:Oh Goody! by badnova · · Score: 1

      I dunno, there's a surprising amount of story in the Haloverse. Although I think an I Love Bees movie would be cooler, I'm willing to give the idea of a Halo movie the benefit of the doubt. :D

    2. Re:Oh Goody! by Richie1984 · · Score: 1

      Or, in the case of the Final Fantasy movie, they have just enough of a plot, but not the movie-making expertise to create something that appeals to a wider audience than gamers. Saying that, I'll reserve judgement on the Halo movie until I see the final cut.

      --
      I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    3. Re:Oh Goody! by sinclair44 · · Score: 1
      When will they learn that video games do not have enough plot to transform into a 90 minute movie?
      As soon as people stop paying to see them.
      --
      Omnes stulti sunt.
    4. Re:Oh Goody! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      hmm? lacking a plot in the videogame is little excuse that a movie 'based' on the game doesn't have a plot. they could you know, have WRITTEN a plot for it.

      besides, there's PLENTY of videogames that have enough plot for a 24 episode tv series.

      knowing halo 2 and another popular new videogame it'll probably just stop in mid-explosion without any explanation.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Oh Goody! by cgenman · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Resident Evil the movie actually had a good plot and some great ideas. Unfortunately it also had a laughably bad CG monster and dogs covered in prosciutto. Mortal Kombat the movie needed some help, but if it were in the hands of a skilled producer it could have been great. Tank Girl "could" have been based on a game, though there wasn't any game in particular that it was based upon. A Silent Hill movie could be great.

      Sadly, there was no helping Alone in the Dark, though Christian Slater really helped drag it away from totally unwatchable.

      I thought Game Over the TV series, which is based upon video gaming in general, was quite good.

      There is no technical reason why movies based upon games will suck any more than there is why games based upon movies will suck. The problem, though, is that these are considered by the studios to be cash-ins. Laura Croft, being essentially a modern Indiana Jones, could have had a great movie in the hands of a skilled director. While Final Fantasy the movie may have been terrible, Fatal Fury the anime was actually quite good. Blood Rayne is just begging to be made into an Uwe Bowl movie (and, in fact, is). The Matrix could easily have been renamed Shawodrun the movie, and it would have been just as believeable. Wargames was an excellent movie based upon Missile Command. Tron was an excellent movie co-developed with the videogame of the same name.

      Don't dismiss video games as a source for movies just because most of them have been money grabs. It may be a while, but eventually we will see good movies based upon worlds created in good games.

    6. Re:Oh Goody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a "surprising" amount of story in a lot of video games, and hollywood always manages to fuck them up.

      Doom 3's story is now REs, Alone In The Dark has noting to do with the game series, House of the Dead was a piece of shit, etc. Do you halo fans really want hollywood to do this to your favorite game, especially the story? I have seen a lot of movie reviews blame the game instead of the move, and most don't realize how much better the games plot is then the movie it is suppose to be based on.

    7. Re:Oh Goody! by idolcrash · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a (somewhat) technical reason why movie to videogame merchandising doesn't turn out well: creating a game typically takes longer than a movie, and both have a lot of reworking in script and technical areas, so the videogame is typically rushed very much so it can follow the finalized movie storyline somewhat and be relevant when it comes out (usually close to the time the movie opens). Rushed games typically don't make for good games.

    8. Re:Oh Goody! by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Matrix could easily have been renamed Shadowrun the movie.

      Meanwhile, Shadowrun could have been named "Neuromancer the Game".

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    9. Re:Oh Goody! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Tank Girl was based on the comic. No game needed. =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    10. Re:Oh Goody! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I don't remember elves, dwarves and dragons in Neuromancer. Maybe I should get some of the good drugs and read it again.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Oh Goody! by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I don't remember elves, dwarves and dragons in Neuromancer.

      Of course not, those came from Tolkien.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  3. What do you think? by avalys · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given what happened with the Doom movie, this one will probably end up being set on Mars with invading demons from hell as the enemy.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:What do you think? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Don't worry if M$ is keeping close watch on the script, the story line will have major flaws. Such as characters changing sex by accident. Plot leaving holes. Blue screens in the middle of the film for no apparent reason.

  4. Microsoft... spreading... by Staplerh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From TFA, with the bolded text added for empthasis:

    Microsoft recently completed a million dollar deal to secure the services of Alex Garland, 28 Days Later and The Beach writer, who is now in the process of penning a screenplay for Halo The Movie.

    Is this a first for Microsoft, diversifying beyond simple computers to reach the unwashed masses, but moving into making some money off the big screen?

    Not that it's a bad thing, I'm not anti-Microsoft in the business sense (well, perhaps anti-Microsoft in the anti-craptacular products sense), but it's interesting.

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
    1. Re:Microsoft... spreading... by Momoru · · Score: 1

      News Update....Halo will only be able to be shown in Movie Theatres that are running Windows Media Player 10

  5. Oh dear by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have high hopes, and low expectations for this movie.

    I hope it is not as bad as it probably will be.

  6. I wonder by LennyDotCom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft is keeping close creative control over the script writing process.
    Will the movie be compatible with non M$ movie theatres?

    --
    http://Lenny.com
  7. Actors by Eh_Steve · · Score: 1

    Matt Damon as Master Cheif? I never played Halo very much in the storyline, but they would have to add in some kind of love interest in there. Jennifer Garner

    1. Re:Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they would have to add in some kind of love interest in there. Jennifer Garner

      Look at the box office returns for Elektra. They may want to cast someone who could attract audiences to pay to see the movie.

      -patternjuggler (slashdot is logging me out when I try to reply)

  8. Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out bungie's last 'Weekly What's Update'. This is grade A crap.

    1. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out bungie's last 'Weekly What's Update'. This is grade A crap.

      Um... no. Did you actually read the update you're talking about? It's pretty clearly worded to say, "We're not going to confirm or deny it." There's not a word in there that says, "We are not making a movie."

  9. More Money for M$ by BlightShadow · · Score: 1

    Not that I'd want to give them more money, but I'll mostly go see this movie. If it flops I'll feel good walking out of the theatre knowing that they wasted their money, and if it's good, well at least I saw a good movie, right?

    1. Re:More Money for M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go to the movie, you are saying with your money "Hey, I went to see this.". You're giving money to Microsoft reguardless of how you rationalize it.

      AND WOULD YOU PEOPLE STOP USING "M$" IT IS ANNOYING AS ALL FUCK!!!!

      (And if you're wondering where my loyalties lie, I'm currently waiting on CD3 of Debian Sarge to finish downloading while typing this up on a Windows XP box, so blah)

  10. Re:Yes... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    dude, that just isnt funny. seriously, what the fuck?

  11. From the weekly what update: by skyman8081 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Billions and billions asked,

    I heard Uwe Boll was directing Halo the movie and it was going to star the Taco Bell dog and Paulie Shore. IS THIS TRUE?

    Well, the statement above does sound like an "interesting" project, but as ever, if you didn't hear it officially from Microsoft or Bungie Studios, you didn't hear it confirmed. This is Microsoft's official line on the existence or non-existence of a Halo movie:

    "Halo is one of the most sought after properties and since the November launch of Halo 2, the interest level has exploded. Halo 2 has now sold more than 6.4 million copies worldwide, bringing the entire Halo franchise to a collective 12.8 million units in just three years' time. We have not, however, made any official movie announcements."

    Is that ambiguous PR talk for, "We haven't announced nothin'?" Yes! Why yes it is!

    --
    Two Roommates and a Boyfriend, updates Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
  12. I would have been excited about this... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... if the title was "Red Vs. Blue".

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:I would have been excited about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Rooster Teeth can barely hold a plot together, let alone try to string along an entire movie. Seriously, after the past two seasons, RvB has jumped the shark... or Puma.

    2. Re:I would have been excited about this... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think RvB would make a better TV series than movie...

      Most of the story ideas would really flesh out well into the 23 minute format, and they include a grand JMS style arc for everyone that likes that sort of stuff.

      BTW: As much as I like this season, Epsiode 39 is still my favorite, just from a Gamers point of view!

  13. Alex Garland? by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

    The same guy who wrote The Beach and is a big fan of Digitiser?

    Ace.

    1. Re:Alex Garland? by antime · · Score: 1

      The one and the same. So at least there's hope the script will be good.

  14. microsoft overseeing the script? by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft is keeping close creative control over the script writing process.

    since we all know that microsoft is well known for coming up with ideas on its own and implementing them on its own, this script will be highly original and will feature new actors in very creative and intriguing scenes and scenarios....

    laugh, its funny.

  15. s/Turkey/Chicken/g by duncangough · · Score: 1

    From that directory, at least we can guarentee that the ending won't be a Turkey, just a Chicken

    Playaholics : Lightning Pool

  16. Re:Yes... by fluffybacon · · Score: 1

    I was bored, calm down and stop taking /. so seriously.

    --
    It's not big, but it's clever!
  17. I got an early look at the script... by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

    The trailer text:

    What is a girl to do?

    Older sister is on her way home from Heaven, and little Mistress Chief, Goddess of the Multiverse, has misplaced Sister's favorite piece of jewelry! If you ever saw her sister angry, you'd see why it's not easy being a Goddess!

    Coming soon from Bungie Entertainment, HALO!!!

  18. What is M$ going to buy this time? by r00td43m0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    M$ bought Bungie to make a decent game for their system. What movie studio, director and cast are they going to buy for the HALO movie?

    1. Re:What is M$ going to buy this time? by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Well, I assume they will have to buy one of the studios that Sony doesn't own yet.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  19. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never heard of "movies" before, so I guess Halo must be the first one ever made! Therefore, it's the best movie ever!

    -A Halo Fanboy

    1. Re:wow! by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Movies are very much like the Halo game. If you go to the cinema, you will be superficially involved in seeing a book rendered in moving images, only with the Final Dénouement replaced by a dissapointing halt leaving room for the sequel.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  20. Microsoft's creative control by Novous · · Score: 1

    I think it's good. They had creative control over Halo 1. Sure it came out late as heck, but it became one the the greatest FPS games made. They know what they want. If Microsoft makes sure it's a good movie, then I have no problem whatsoever.

    But then again, I've yet to see a "game movie" that didn't suck...

    1. Re:Microsoft's creative control by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft did not have creative control over either of the Halo games; they had timetable control over the first, and maybe that's what you were thinking of. I'm almost certain that Bungie made sure they kept creative control by the contract.

      As for the movie... I'm not holding my breath. Bungie has denied plans are in the works and MS has given a "no comment" statement.

      ~UP

      --
      Eat the Path.
  21. What MS/Bungie Should Do... by Mitaphane · · Score: 1

    What Microsoft and Bungie should do is just make the movie themselves. Make the movie a 90 minute cutscene using the Halo 2 engine. It would cost a fraction of the cost and it would be on the same level as all the other movies made from games. While we're at it, Namco should have done this too for Tekken instead of allowing this piece of shit to be made. It shouldn't be that hard. If the Red Vs. Blue guys did it with next to nothing for a budge someone with a serious budget should be able to make some good, right?

    1. Re:What MS/Bungie Should Do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt the resolution would scale to a movie theather sized screen.

    2. Re:What MS/Bungie Should Do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, remember that resolution is being used because most of the cinematics are using the in-game engine, rendered in real-time by an Xbox.

      If they pre-rendered everything on render farms (as all CG movies are) and used super-detailed models (that I bet they have, or could make), I'd wager they could make pretty high-res cinematics.

  22. Finally! A Game That Becomes a Movie! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally! Now it'll join such brilliant game to movie adaptations as...
    * Mario Brothers
    * Tomb Raider
    * That fighting one with Raul Julia and Kylie Minogue
    * Final Fantasy
    * Mortal Combat
    * Another Tomb Raider, with the same plot devices

    And unless someone puts a plot into this one, it'll suck just like they did.

    Is it just that producers see dollar signs everywhere in games, so think they can cash in with minimal work, that the people buying the games are stupid enough to flock to a crap movie just because it ties to the games?

    I suspect they forget that games require less plot and character development than movies, as the players themselves supply either or both by the way they play. The result is that Tomb Raider was execrable, Final Fantasy (while having a plot) was dull in the extreme and that in general, games make really bad movies.

    The best thing that could be hoped is that the movie would be so action packed with whiz-bang effects that it would distract people from the lack of a plot, pacing or character development so typical of game movies.

    I'm not overly hopeful of this one. You can tell, can't you?

    1. Re:Finally! A Game That Becomes a Movie! by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

      Halo is a very lucrative item for Microsoft. They knew better than to hand control over to another Uwe Boll, like so many of the other video game adaptations before it. That's why Microsoft is having someone else do the script but keeping close creative control over it, and only submitting it to holywood when it is pretty much finished.

      Granted, 28 days later may or may not be your cup of tea, but it's certainly better than any of those festering shitheaps like Alone in the Dark or House of the Dead. I'm glad Microsoft didn't take the easy way out and sell the rights to the first person who came to their doorstep.

      However, with close creative control, now we have to worry about an hour and a half of the same sets over and over again, but that's anotehr story. :)

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    2. Re:Finally! A Game That Becomes a Movie! by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      I suspect they forget that games require less plot and character development than movies, as the players themselves supply either or both by the way they play. The result is that Tomb Raider was execrable, Final Fantasy (while having a plot) was dull in the extreme and that in general, games make really bad movies.

      Why is everyone pointing out that game movies are all terrible? Although its true, it doesn't set them apart from all the Hollywood trash that isn't games related.

    3. Re:Finally! A Game That Becomes a Movie! by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Wait a second . . . a fighting movie with Kylie Minogue and some girl named Julia? Sounds like my kind of movie!

    4. Re:Finally! A Game That Becomes a Movie! by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      People said the same thing about "comic book" movies and yet we've seen a good Batman film or two, some decent X-Men material, okay Spider-man movies (to others, I don't like them), and even a good Tom Hanks vehicle.

      Wait until the first really good video game movie comes out and makes $200m. Then they will pay attention.

      Keep in mind, Batman made over $350m*, X2 made over $200m, Spider-man over $451m. Sure these are "comic book" movies and not "video game" movies but the are similar in many ways: key audience is young males, medium not "understood" by the mainstream, generally flimsy writing for both. And what happens? Some (Tim Burton) makes a decent movie and the movie makes a LOT of money.

      Tomb Raider is the most succesful video game movie and it barely scratched $130m.
      Mortal Kombat? Barely $85m.
      Super Mario Brothers? About $25m.
      Even Resident Evil: Apocalypse which was at least somewhat watchable (compared to the previous two on my list) only made about $50m, barely breaking even.

      Alone in the Dark only cost $20m, but it hasn't even picked up $4.5m and it dropped 72% off it'a first frame. They'll be lucky if they make the money back after home video and international.

      My point? Uwe Boll and Paul W.S. Anderson are easily acquired and are test runs into the market. We will be seeing a good video game movie come out in the next decade. A really good one. Might not be Halo, probably won't be Doom, but we'll see it.

      * All figures are U.S. box office gross estimated to today's dollars with inflation.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  23. Re:Yes... by MBraynard · · Score: 0, Troll

    I found it funny. Mods here seem more interested in modding down than up. I think for the next week I will metamoderate and thumbs down anyone who gave a negative score to anything when they could have been moddin gstuff up.

  24. Let me answer this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trailer text:
    What is a girl to do?


    Simple. It's a girl who wants you to do her.
    Want to know such a girl? Read this HOWTO by Eric S. Raymond.

  25. It will suck, hard by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and before you mod Troll, here's the reason why: Halo's a war story, more or less; and I cannot envision a world where, after the script has been rung through upteenth million committees that it won't be a generic, explosion ridden, war-themed action fest. Really people, how could it possibly make it through production without having every warstory cliche in the book tacked on for good measure? I don't care what the original screenwritter wants, I don't care what the director wants. To maximize profits, The final product will be tailor made for the broadest audience possible. The result will appeal to all and be watchable by none. Oh well, could be worse. Could be Tomb Raider III....

    Now I will do something that will quite possibly make me the most hated man alive: defend the Super Mario Brother movie. I've never understood why people revial it so. It wasn't great, but it wasn't a souless rape of my childhood (that what the live action Scooby Doo was for). Watching it, I felt the cast and crew genuinely tried to make a good movie. It didn't have the laziness of a Tomb Raider or the cheapness of Street Fighter. Then again I was a kid when I saw it, and in the target audience. Go back and watch some of the crap you watched as a kid and loved (Thundercats, anyone) and see how well it holds up.

    Anyway, that's it for me. Be here next week when I explain why E.T. for the Atari 2600 really wasn't that awful a game. No, really, stop laughing. It's not funny. Certainly not that funny. You can stop laughing now.....

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It will suck, hard by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Go back and watch some of the crap you watched as a kid and loved (Thundercats, anyone) and see how well it holds up.

      It holds up fine - the plot always sucked, but cheetarah's still hot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. This is purely good news by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Alex Garland is a pretty good writer. Not only did he write 28 Days Later, but Danny Boyle's other, underrated movie "The Beach", and the book of the same name that it was based on. I've read said book, and had a tough time putting it down.

    I don't know how he would deal with Sci-Fi, but it seems like the movie is in good hands

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  27. Might not be bad... by DanthemaninVA1 · · Score: 1

    Considering that Bungie has apparently drawn out an entire century of storyline for the Halo universe, this movie might not be all that bad. They could make it a prequel to the first game, about the start of the war with the Covenant, and the establishment of the Cole Protocol.

    1. Re:Might not be bad... by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Go pick up "Halo: First Strike" by Eric Nylund. Considering it's a book based off an Xbox game, it's not half bad. It covers the start of the Covenant/Human war, as well as the Spartan program that produced Master Chief. Turns out there were quite a few of those wacky Spartans, making it easier to turn into a movie. More characters = more character interaction = more entertaining. (In theory. There are obviously exceptions)

    2. Re:Might not be bad... by Moonshadow · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd like to see Fall of Reach movie-ized. It was really a pretty decent story, and there is a lot more character interaction to work with than there is in the game or in First Strike. You'd have to find a way to make the ending a little more concrete (since the book ending is just a setup for the game), but I think it could be done.

    3. Re:Might not be bad... by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      The Fall of Reach is part of First Strike. (The end actually)

    4. Re:Might not be bad... by Moonshadow · · Score: 1

      There's a Halo book titled 'Fall of Reach'. Its story was the richest of the three books, IMO.

  28. Cheap set design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the set design will be easy - they can just build one room and one hallway and film every scene in the same two areas over and over again.

  29. The face of Master Chief by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    So how long into Judge Dredd did we get before Sylvester Stallone took off his helmet for the camera?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  30. I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally didn't like 28 Days. I never saw The Beach. I don't know this guy enough to trust him to do Halo a service. But that aside, there are a few problems I have with a Halo movie.

    First, I do not want to see the Master Chief's face, ever. As far as I'm concerned, they should cast the same guy who did his voice in the games and just have him voice over for some dude in an armor suit and leave the helmet on. C-3PO never had a moving mouth, and he's entirely belivable. For the longest time, I never even realized he never had a moving mouth, because his body was so expressive.

    Second, like all the books that were made into movies, there is way too much story to Halo to push into a 2 hour movie. Some will argue with me on this, because you just go around shooting and blowing things up the entire time. But read the books, and then tell me there isn't a story to tell. The books and the games have a serious continuity going, and I cannot possibly see a movie keeping with this trend. There's already been comparisons to the Doom movie, but there wasn't exactly a rich story to back up the game (the books had lots of story, but you can't really say they followed the Doom story line since there wasn't much story to begin with). The only thing that was important was Mars, Demons coming through a gate, and a space marine. And someone STILL managed to screw that one up. So how can anyone expect an honest-to-god GOOD movie from a story that doesn't even fit into three books, two games, and obviously the other games/books that will be made if Bungie expects to conclude the Halo story.

    Which brings up another thing: there isn't an ending to Halo right now. How can they end the movie when the Halo story isn't even complete yet?

    I don't want to give in yet and say the movie will definitely suck. It could be good in its own right. But it's foolish to expect a gem with so much going against it.