Slashdot Mirror


New IRC Network For Open Source Projects

Anonymous Coward writes "The folks over at Tech Tower IRC have decided to turn their small IRC network into a place for Open Source projects. They have also changed some policies to allow users on their networks to help shape the network, the big one is holding public meetings to discuss the network. Could this be the next freenode? They are also asking for individuals that wish to found general channels, this means that if you are lucky, you can lead the next #linux."

35 comments

  1. next freenode? by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why do you need a next freenode?

    why do you need a new irc network? has there really been some open source folks thinking that "oh gosh, i'd like to have an irc channel for this project.. but damn i can't do it on any of the currently online free servers"?

    was someone too bored again?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:next freenode? by Kizzle · · Score: 0, Troll

      It would be nice to have one IRC server I can log into and find a bunch of open source projects in spot free of the usual warez and pr0n garbage.

    2. Re:next freenode? by avalys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And what makes you think this new network won't have the same problems as Freenode after a week or so?

      Personally, I've never had any troubles with warez and porn on Freenode, so I don't even know what you're complaining about.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:next freenode? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      come over to freenode then.
      or a dozen other irc-networks.

      freenode also has chanserv and other associated helpers so there's no point in starting a new irc-network for having them.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:next freenode? by Curtman · · Score: 1

      why do you need a next freenode?

      And since when was #linux a pinnacle of excellence?

    5. Re:next freenode? by BossMC · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need another Freenode. There is no relevant reason for this new network. Freenode works well, and most of the users are intelligent and helpful.

    6. Re:next freenode? by dddbliss · · Score: 1

      This network was designed to allow the users a say in how it ran and operated, allows for more opinions to be shared without conflict, and also allows the development of software in an environment that is dedicated to seeing Open Source projects succeed.

    7. Re:next freenode? by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is there a lot of warez and porn on Freenode? I've never noticed. Mind you, I only sit in one social and a few project channels (go #squeak !)... Unlike other networks, I've never had problems with spambots coming into channel and posting message about porn sites, and I've never had those random msgs with the same content.

      So, in short- why not just use freenode?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  2. I find freenode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perfectly ok. I see no reason to switch.

  3. So whats wrong with Freenode? by profet · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is there anything wrong with freenode that requires a second network? Won't this lead to the eventual division of potential useful chatter?

    I just don't get it.

    1. Re:So whats wrong with Freenode? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope, nothing wrong with FreeNode.

      But, geeks like to feel important some times, so they, instead of helping the current system be better, they just make thier own thing. Which is ultimately destructive to the community, because that means there are less quality in the networks and people, usually.

    2. Re:So whats wrong with Freenode? by cnettel · · Score: 1

      By forking networks, they create more room for possibly redundant chatter without anyone noticing.

  4. half there half here by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd prefer everything to remain in Freenode too.

    That said, I snatched up #linux :-D

    1. Re:half there half here by jdowland · · Score: 1

      Can't say I'm jealous, good luck admining something like that :P

  5. What's wrong with freenode? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 2, Informative

    This seems somehow redundant. What's wrong with freenode that we need another IRC network?

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:What's wrong with freenode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re.dun.dan.cy n,

      See redundancy

    2. Re:What's wrong with freenode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's wrong with freenode that we need another IRC network?
      It wouldn't be run by lilo.
    3. Re:What's wrong with freenode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only "What's wrong with Freenode?" but also "What's wrong with current alternatives for Freenode?" OFTC is one for starters. IRCnet #linux (among others) also hosts several OSS-related channels. I think Freenode (aka OPN) and OFTC are the most popular for F/OSS related chat although Mozilla and GIMP IRC are also popular... now, whats wrong with them?

    4. Re:What's wrong with freenode? by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      recursion n,
      See recursion, you insensitive clod

  6. before an admin sees by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    Quick, someone steal the "T".

  7. Could this be the next freenode? by Ianoo · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the current freenode?

  8. channels by Esine · · Score: 1

    That said, I snatched up #linux :-D

    Oh yeah? Well I have ops on #c++ and #openbsd! beat that!

    1. Re:channels by rbullo · · Score: 1

      Try posting a reply instead of a new thread.

      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    2. Re:channels by Steelfish · · Score: 1

      lol, Now whyed you gotta go do that :P But well your lucky :D

      --
      :)
    3. Re:channels by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey man you mind as well claim #windows and call yourself Bi11G@t3$.

  9. Next! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has happened before, see the OFTC network. All it does is fragment the community, as I have to be on this network for #openbsd, that network for #mozilla, the other network for #gimp, etc etc etc. I want one network, one signon, and one nick!

  10. Sorry, but.... by pomac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm kinda amazed that all opensource projects use cluttered and amazingly annoying ircd's.

    Like freenodes dancer:
    Server There are 9541 victims and 10397 hiding on 24 servers

    But if you do lusers again it states:
    Server server load is temporarily too heavy, please try again later?

    But ircu based networks has no problems with:
    Server There are 41787 users and 74748 invisible on 31 servers

    Unreal is to me a insane server to use...

    I'm just waiting for a "opensource projects network" to use something sane. But then working on ircclients and servers i guess i'm biased, esp since i prefer Undernets ircd.

    Until someone does a OpenSource p2p im system that is totally distributed etc etc etc, and ppl actually use it. Then just let programmers use whatever network they feel like using.

    1. Re:Sorry, but.... by D.+Taylor · · Score: 1

      The 'server load is too high' stuff on repeated /lusers (amongst other commands) is a configurable option in ircd-hybrid, to prevent people flooding the server with resource intensive commands. I don't beleive /lusers uses many resources, but *shrug*.

      dancer is a heavily bastardised version of hybrid that I submitted a small amount of work for before deciding I, uh, disagreed with their (mainly lilo's) policies.

    2. Re:Sorry, but.... by pomac · · Score: 1

      Heh, yep the "server load to high" bit seems pretty lame actually, from any point of view.

      And thanks for that piece of information i actually didn't know that it was based on hybrid. I only know that it causes problems due to broken 005 replies and stuff like that.

      (But as i stated before, i'm a ircu person myself =))

      PS. What are youre thoughts about unreal then? =)
      DS.

  11. Why another? by reynaert · · Score: 1

    There already is freenode. For those who are annoyed by freenode's begging for money, there's OFTC. Gnome people have GIMPnet. What's the use of yet another network?

  12. Exactly. by suss · · Score: 1

    There's nothing wrong with freenode and even if you would have issues with it, there's always OFTC.

    In short, "meh".

  13. do you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you know how many bazillion small irc networks are out there? this is nothing more than an attempt by a small network try and get more people to actually use it. that's it. end of story.

  14. IRC Protocol versus SILC, what's wrong with IRC? by shapr · · Score: 1

    In essence, IRC is an old protocol, it needs help.

    SILC is unicode-only, encrypt-only, allows MIME messages, uses a hybrid topology to be netsplit resistant, etc.

    SILC isn't fully p2p as one poster suggested, but it's a lot better than IRC.

    --

    Shae Erisson - ScannedInAvian.com
  15. So what you're saying is... by vidnet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Passport!

  16. Begging for money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easy to complain about "all this begging for money"---but where is it? The nonprofit org that runs freenode has a fundraiser once a year to raise a small salary and some incidentals, but nobody even knows it's going on unless they look at the website or see it on some channel topic.