Slashdot Mirror


GNOME 2.10 Beta 1 Screenshot Demo

linuxbeta writes "GNOME 2.10 Beta 1 has just been released. There is a nice screenshot demo here. Also known as 2.9.90, GNOME 2.10 Beta 1 is the first pre-release intended for wide public scrutiny before the final release in March. It is packed full of tasty GNOME goodness. This release is a feature frozen snapshot primarily intended for wide public scrutiny before the final GNOME 2.10 release in March. Like the good old days of Linux kernel development, GNOME uses odd minor version numbers to indicate development status. Please check the 2.9 start page for more info. - gnomedesktop.org/node/2138"

38 of 480 comments (clear)

  1. Shitty SS's by wdd1040 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah... 640x480 screenshots with a shitty theme really show us the changes to Gnome.

    Is it me, or does this look worse than the stock ubuntu install Gnome?

    --
    wdd
    1. Re:Shitty SS's by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is it me, or does this look worse than the stock ubuntu install Gnome?

      If you look through the screenshots, it is an Ubuntu install, and has a number of the Ubuntu customisations already, so it's not even very representative of what the general GNOME 2.10 user is going to get. All up, the screenshots aren't worth your time, head here to see what changes GNOME 2.10 has.

      Jedidiah.

  2. Vectorized graphics by st3v · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope GNOME will take a step ahead and use vector graphics. Then those of us that use large screen resolutions (such as those UXGA laptops) will have nice looking fonts without a magnifying glass. I know it might be easier said than done, but this will push the Linux desktop miles ahead.

    1. Re:Vectorized graphics by be-fan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fonts are already vectorial. If you've got a high-resolution screen, just go to "Preferences", then "Fonts", click the "Details" button, and set the "Resolution" spinner to get the fonts to the right size. For a UXGA laptop, presuming a 15" screen, 133dpi is the proper resolution, and 8-9 is the right-size for the UI font. I have such a screen, and I use Albany AMT 9pt at 130dpi, with sub-pixel anti-aliasing disabled (but the auto-hinter enabled). I've also heard of good results with 8pt or 9pt Tahoma at 133 dpi with sub-pixel AA enabled.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Vectorized graphics by ticktockticktock · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm. I thought the font issue was already solved, at least in SUSE, where font sizes at a given point are exactly the same size (or very close to it) in different resolutions. I vaguely remember reading somewhere, that it was actually an X related feature where it calculates the actual pixel heights/widths based on the DDC info from the monitor that contained the monitor's actual height/width, and if it cannot get that info, it defaults to something (I think).

    3. Re:Vectorized graphics by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tell me about it. I did an SVG icon recently for an app of mine. It looked great at 48x48. But when I went to create bitmaps for the Mac OSX icon (which required a greater range of resolutions), I discovered that what looks good at 48x48 often looks like crap at 16x16, and fugly at 128x128. The problem is that when you scale an SVG image, everything scales, including the line widths. I had to manually tweak each resolution by hand.

      Why would you need so many resolutions? Why can't everything be 128x128? Because that same icon is going to be used as the app icon in the folder or destkop, a smaller size if the folder is in a columnar view mode, as a quick launch icon on the panel, and as a mini icon in the titlebar or task manager. You will also have the rude heretic users who will change the GNOME defaults.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  3. Re:What about Nautilus by wdd1040 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can do that now by going into your Desktop | Preferences | File Management applet.

    --
    wdd
  4. Gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful


    A changelog be more useful than crappy screenshots...

    And why is this news anyway? There's several hundred current distros. Wheres the news posts for all those?

    1. Re:Gnome? by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Informative

      A changelog be more useful than crappy screenshots...

      Indeed, this story seems to be a waste of time. If you want screenshots that actually show you what you're getting that's different, look here. It's old news (it's been up for some time), but it gives you a far better idea of what you're getting.

      Jedidiah.

  5. Volume Control by espergreen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having used gnome 2.92 in Ubuntu Hoary, I have to say the best new feature is the volume control. The old one had way to much information, the new one is amazing. It's hard to describe, but it's much better than the old one. It may not seem like a big deal. But gnome currently only has a mediocre volume control. In the next release it will have the best volume control I have ever used on any platform.

  6. bad menu UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a big space between the "foot" and "Applications" (same spacing as between other menus), yet they're the same menu?! Either glue the foot to Applications, or call it foot *or* applications. What where they thinking?

  7. still only one background for workspaces by DeathAndTaxes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just about the only complaint I have with gnome. You're stuck with the same desktop pic on all your workspaces. It's gone on too long, and it's silly.

  8. What, does it go to 11 ? by anti-NAT · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't think there could be much room left for new invention in volume controls.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  9. A geeks wishlist... by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Smaller GTK widgets (Maybe its just perceived, but GNOME, and GTK apps in general seem to waste waay to much real estate... not everyone has a 21' monitor..)

    A decent default theme (Grey is ugly. Get over it.)

  10. Re:Fonts look nice by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Would be nice with some comments and screenshots showing whats new. I really couldnt tell any difference from the previous releases (could have tried hrder but I m lazy:) Also that theme muust be the most ugly one they could have choosen...

    I think this is what you're looking for - of course this one is "old news" having been posted on Slashdot previously. It does a lot better of job of actually showing you what to expect in GNOME 2.10 than the selection of Ubuntu screenshots from OSDir though.

    Jedidiah.

  11. KISS: Ubuntu and Gnome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Congrats to the Gnome and Ubuntu teams. You have taken Linux from depths of desktop mediocrity and confusion and transformed it into something that real people can use to get work done.

  12. Question? by Vectorferret · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a real question (not trolling), does Gnome have a graphical way to edit the menus yet? My primary reason for staying with KDE is I don't want to have to edit them manually.

    1. Re:Question? by chazwurth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, several.

      You can right-click in the menus for some options. You can also, for example, open a nautilus browser window and type 'applications://' in the URL bar to edit the applications menus as if they were directories.

      Check out the GNOME docs on menu editing. They're not perfect, but they aren't too bad.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
  13. Re:Wow! It looks, it looks....(exactly the same?) by be-fan · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Assistive Technology" is technology to help the disabled use computers. Stuff like screen magnifiers, screen-readers, high-contrast colors and icons, etc.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  14. gnomeflexiserver tied in with xscreensaver by Sark666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried gnome recently and found out about this cmd to graphically quick user switch a la xp/osx. So one user can log in and leave other(s) still logged in.

    This has some issues but what would give almost complete functionality right now, would be if the screensaver had an option to run gnomeflexiserver.

    The other problem with this though, is if logged in as another user, the other users settings for xscreensaver will kick in after the idle time and bog down the other user(s). I also believe this will take over the 3d functionality of the users card and not allow another user to use it.

    Also, I recently set up my .asoundrc file for software mixing with alsa, and used esd for gnome sounds and piped to alsa. I get sound in pretty much everything simultaneously, nothing holding the soundcard, but if another user uses gdmflexiserver to log in, that user will have no sound.

    Afaik, this is also a bit of a kludge, tying another Xscreen to a vert terminal similar to some users using ctrl alt f8 for the other X session. I'm not sure if there would be a way to tie multiple users to one Xsession, but I would think it would save resources and potentionally avoid sound/video accel getting taken over by just one login.

    I know this is somewhat off topic as I don't believe gdm is being enhanced in the coming future in this regard, but I'd like to know how /. users deal with this with multiple users in the household. Esp wanting to lock out kids from ones login by xscreensaver but not locking them out from theirs.

    Xp and MacX have now had this for ages. The DE's for linux really need to catch up in this regard.

  15. Perhaps I'm missing something... by hatrisc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But screenshots of the next version of a piece of software do absolutely nothing if it looks exactly the same!

    --
    I write code.
  16. Wow! by gustgr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait to see the ScreeShots of Gnome 2.10 Beta 2!

  17. Better screenshots/descriptions by kasparov · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are some better screenshots of apps in this release with descriptions. Much better than the 640x480 screenshots linked to in the article.

    --
    There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
  18. Innovation at Slashdot! by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Funny

    GNOME 2.10 Beta 1 is the first pre-release intended for wide public scrutiny before the final release in March. It is packed full of tasty GNOME goodness. This release is a feature frozen snapshot primarily intended for wide public scrutiny before the final GNOME 2.10 release in March.

    To those who say the Slashdot staff are resting on their laurels, I present you with what I believe to be the first case of single-story duplicity!

    1. Re:Innovation at Slashdot! by forkazoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's called either a pre-emptive dupe, or a demidupe.

  19. Re:Truth: The State of Desktop Linux by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh really?

    Besides, I thought that personal tastes are just that. Personal.

  20. Re:Difference by tpgp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Honestly, I relaly don't see much of a difference.

    I am going to presume you meant really, rather then relay.

    How about the places menu, the MultiMedia Systems Selector, maybe the Device Manager or the Dictionay.

    But honestly, this is an incremental release. What were you expecting? A complete revamp?

    --
    My pics.
  21. Re:Truth: The State of Desktop Linux by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as both a mac and linux user I'm bothered by both you trolls, stop being jerks and actually realize that a) both platforms have their merits and drawbacks and b) competition is good.

    [begin rant]

    I'm getting goddamn sick and tired of fan-boy posts, be they linux, mac, windows, goddamn paper tape, etc. Take the time to actually use a platform and you'll realize that it probably has its merits (yes even windows). Go out, stop trolling, and get a life. Posts like the parent and grandparent are the reason why slashdot is sometimes such a pain to read.

    [end rant]

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  22. Re:fix the file selection by Sark666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can press ctrl-L to get a cli for typing the path.

  23. GNOME by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There was once a day when I was in the GNOME camp. I didn't like the non-free Qt stuff. These days, Qt is not much of an issue. I still appreciate the GNOME guys for giving us an alternative but...

    Why does GNOME always seem to be in a state of trying to define itself - to always be in the concept stage? Perpetually in ALPHA state.

    Is GNOME still the GNU Network Object Model Environment of old?

    Now, in favor of GNOME I must add: There are some GNOME apps that just rock. I really like the process list, some of the games and the panel apps. The widgets are crisp, beautiful and intuitive just like they were on the original GIMP.

    The GNOME guys have got alot of impressive code. Now to use that code to form a cohesive and easy to use interface that doesn't change drastically with every point release.

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  24. Re:Difference by yobbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    It took you 10 years, and you still can't see Gnome's theme feature.

    Even worse, you're considered informative on slashdot.

    Let's do the timewarp again!

  25. Re:I didn't RTFA but can it.... by DeathToBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    *sigh*

    You didn't actually try it did you? Come on, 'fess up...

    Try any of the following:

    1. Right click on the menu. Click "Enture Menu" -> "Add New Item To This Menu"
    2. Open nautilus, go to "applications:///". Right click, click "Create Launcher".
    3. Right click on the desktop, click "Create Launcher". Drag the resulting launcher to the panel.
    4. Open the Applications menu, drag an item to your desktop (it would be nice if this worked the other way around, but it doesn't for me - YMMV).

    Admittedly, 1 only works on launcher items in the menu, not items that are actually submenus. Even so, it would be nice if you could *try* the feature you're complaining about before you complain.

    Note: The above works for me in GNOME 2.8, Debian/Sid edition. Not sure how much variation there is in other distros.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  26. Re:Difference by natrius · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't have the first fucking idea what that's supposed to mean.

    And you shouldn't if you don't use GNOME, because even if you did use it, you're not supposed to need to select a different backend for GStreamer. Some distros don't even include it in the menu because its advanced configuration that most users will never need. It's purpose is to allow you to use a different sound server, like KDE's artsd. If you want to know more about it, google some of the terms you don't know about. I'm not trying to to belittle you, but you're coming out of nowhere trying to put down the design of things you've never even used. It shouldn't be a surprise that you don't know the purpose of some things.

    Volume isn't related to sound controls? I think you'll find you're mistaken.

    No, that's not what I said. Volume isn't related to the Multimedia Systems Selector. It's named that because that's exactly what it is. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it should have a volume control slapped on it. Like I said before, it's a window that you would never see unless you typed the command in the command line since it's not in the menu.

    What's a panel, and what's an applet?

    Panels are the bars at the top and bottom of the screen. they hold programs called applets. Look in the screenshot you were referring to. See the little speaker icon at the top right? That's what any user trying to change the volume would go to, not the Multimedia Systems Selector, because, for the third and final time, it's an advanced configuration program not meant for most users to deal with.

    Pop in one of the many live CDs that have been posted on Slashdot over the past week or so and try out GNOME. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by how much easier it is to use than you think. There's still a lot of room for improvement though, and it gets better with every release. I hear 2.10 has a new volume control applet.

  27. Screenshoots? Is this a fashion site or what? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about posting articles talking about features, bug fixes and enhancements. I mean, we are talking about software after all, aren't we?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  28. Re:Fonts look nice by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you want to see how a good desktop environment renders text, look no further than Mac OS X.

    Seen it. Not impressed. Many vertical strokes were anti-aliased to be two pixels wide when they should render one wide. It makes the text look blurry. I've seen that on Linux before too, though it's since been fixed (problem with the font hinting?).

    I use Gnome. Looks great on my LCD with sub-pixel anti-aliasing. I suspect the problem with the screenshots is that they use the default fonts (the free Bitstream ones I think). I use the Microsoft fonts, mostly Verdana. Verdana may not be pretty but it's designed for on-screen readability, and renders well.

  29. file chooser still broken by coaxial · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So after much out cry over the file chooser in 2.6, they decided to change it again. The problem with the 2.6 dialog was that there wasn't a way to type in filenames. GNOME is the only framework that doesn't allow users to type in filenames. Almost 30 years of GUI research and development had this, but GNOME decided that was dumb. Now, GNOME did allow users to type in a directory names if they hit CTRL-L. The problem with that is that it's hidden from the user.

    Now, GNOME has added typeahead find to the dialog. Well, that got rid of the CTRL-L nonsense, but it's still hidden functionality, and doesn't allow users to paste in filenames.

    This is just incompetence.

  30. Gnome Sucks by Icephreak1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I never did like Gnome. It reminds me of those big utility crayons you give to first-graders to teach them dexterity.

    Enlightenment. Now that's a man's GUI.

    - IP

  31. Re: It's the fonts, stupid by gidds · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Please don't think that everyone dislikes anti-aliased fonts. Personally, I love 'em; I find 'em much easier on my eyes. Non-AA fonts may be 'sharper', but that sharpness is just an artefact of the rasterisation. To me, they look gritty, awkward and uneven; AA fonts are much smoother and easier to read, even at fairly small sizes. (At least, here on OS X.) And they're a more accurate representation of the glyphs.

    As others have said, you can usually disable AA on your fonts; but if you're running at a reasonably high resolution, on a reasonable quality monitor, with a reasonable font renderer, then it's worth giving them a second try.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.