Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Judge in SCO Case Notes Lack of Evidence

Posted by Zonk on from the what-are-we-doing-here? dept.

In a follow-up to yesterday's story, Allen Zadr writes "Computer Business Online has an article up today entitled 'Judge astonished by SCO's lack of evidence against IBM'. From the article: "Viewed against the backdrop of SCO's plethora of public statements... it is astonishing that SCO has not offered any competent evidence..." This is exactly what Groklaw has been saying all along, and they have commentary on the news as well."

4 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. DUPE by networkBoy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't care if it ref's a previous atricle, it's still enough of a dupe to not be on the front page.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  2. Shock! by duguk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone else shocked beyond belief?

    Na, me either.

    Ain't this a dupe too?

    Dug

    PS. FP?

  3. In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot readers astonished by a lack of checking for duped articles.

    Or not.

  4. In Solidarity With The Rest Of The /. Morons... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    DUPE! DUPE!

    That said, YESTERDAY it was a great read to see the Judge say words like "complete lack thereof" (of evidence), etc.

    What he meant was this: "I'm not gonna rule in IBM's favor TODAY, but if you don't come up with something that at least creates a DISPUTE by the end of the discovery phase, I'm kicking your ass to the curb!"

    I can't wait to see how Rob Enderle and Maureen O'Gara and Laura Didio are gonna spin this one in the trade press...

    With all the hoopla about Armstrong Williams and this fake White House news guy Gannon (who runs gay porn sites, no less - Bush must be thrilled given Kitty Kelly's accusations), one would expect these three (and Judith Miller at the NYT, whom the Times Public Editor has accused of spreading White House propaganda that has not been revealed even to her bosses at the Times) to be under investigation for taking Microsoft and SCO bribes.
    (Of course, the companies they work for take Microsoft bribes - only they call them "research contracts", but still...)

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!