Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Judge in SCO Case Notes Lack of Evidence

Posted by Zonk on from the what-are-we-doing-here? dept.

In a follow-up to yesterday's story, Allen Zadr writes "Computer Business Online has an article up today entitled 'Judge astonished by SCO's lack of evidence against IBM'. From the article: "Viewed against the backdrop of SCO's plethora of public statements... it is astonishing that SCO has not offered any competent evidence..." This is exactly what Groklaw has been saying all along, and they have commentary on the news as well."

5 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Dupe? by glhturbo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't this a dupe?

  2. Can't we go 24 hrs at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Before we dupe stories? How fucking stupid does one have to be as an editor to dupe the same story albeit different articles in a 24 hr period....

  3. whoa by Run4yourlives · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Deja vu

  4. parent/child articles by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe /. should start having parent + child articles, so that DUPE's show up all under the "previous story".

    --
    stuff |
  5. Redundant Mods are Amusing by syntap · · Score: 0, Redundant

    when given to:

    1) Replies to dupe articles

    2) Replies to SCO articles, which themselves are all dupes anyway.

    We need s mod that scores zero for a redundant comment to SCO articles and dupe articles.