Slashdot Mirror


T-Moblile Cracker Pleads Guilty

hackajar writes "The Register is reporting Nicholas Lee Jacobsen plead guilty to cracking into T-Mobile's phones. He was picked up in mid October of last year in the "Operation Firewall" sweep by the FBI. He faces "maximum five years' prison and a $250,000 fine" according to the site."

139 comments

  1. damn by caryw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    all my SMS's are belong to him
    Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

    1. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This story was already covered in more detail on Slashdot before. The funny thing about the other article is it details the political implications of such prosecution. The government is using it as justification to whittle away at our rights one at at time. Before too long there will be nothing left for us to defend. The Constitution will be a vague memory.

    2. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/my/logout/[snip]

      Why is it that a link to logout is moderated as Interesting?

      The rest of the commont seems to be a canned response. It talks about political implications... ok what political implications? It talks about the loss of rights. Ok what loss of what rights? The flashlight is being held at a nice angle but isn't illuminating anything! It could be interesting if the link linked to something other than *LOGOUT* of Slashdot.

      A mod is on CRACK! Check those links!

    3. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was a little funny... the problem is that we're not teenage girls so we don't know what 'SMS' is ... well... I do, but I'm not a girl...
      eh.

    4. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that your comment is offtopic, thus making your statements about inappropriate moderations hypocritical?

    5. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that your comment is offtopic, thus making your statements about inappropriate moderations hypocritical?

      My comment was offtopic and should be marked as such if someone took the time. Nothing hypocritical about my post.

  2. Summary is misleading... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 5, Informative
    He cracked into the network, not just phones... from TFA:
    Nicholas Lee Jacobsen accessed US Secret Service email, obtained customers' passwords and Social Security numbers, and downloaded candid photos taken by Sidekick users, including Hollywood celebrities, as we reported in January.
    --
    "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

    - Seneca
    1. Re:Summary is misleading... by mboverload · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It is one thing to crack into a network. Stealing social security numbers and personal photos is another, however.

      Other than the "respect" we give him for being able to pull it off, he had no noble intensions in mind what so ever. This man deserves none of our, or your, sympathy.

    2. Re:Summary is misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No cracker deserves respect, at all.

      A hacker, on the other hand...

    3. Re:Summary is misleading... by blowdart · · Score: 5, Funny

      he had no noble intensions in mind what so ever

      Whereas if he'd managed to use the intrustion to delete every single custom ringtone off every connected mobile he would have been sainted. :)

    4. Re:Summary is misleading... by traffi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Other than the "respect" we give him for being able to pull it off
      I'm not sure if we should give him any "respect" - quotation marks or no.

      The article doesn't say anything about how he did it so it might well have been Mitnick style "hacking" , involving tricking people over the phone to give out passwords (also called social engineering which he wrote a book on).

      So this might have been a confidence hack rather than a techie hack, although I admit I don't know which it was...
      --

      Treo + Kaffi = Traffi
    5. Re:Summary is misleading... by mboverload · · Score: 1

      No, it was a techie hack. They described him as "sofiticated hacker" so this had to be more than just script kiddie.

    6. Re:Summary is misleading... by ceeam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhhhm, yes, the _crackers_ that crack viruses deserve no respect. Uhhhm, yes, the crackers that expose mal/spyware deserve no respect. Yes, the crackers that crack commercial drivers to find out how hardware should be programmed deserve no respect. Etc, to infinity.

    7. Re:Summary is misleading... by DaRiachu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Always the subject of debate, eh?

      Why not just call 'em all hackers and let things like adjectives sort 'em out.

      Oh, wait! That'd get people to stop being righteously indignant, and we can't have that. :(

    8. Re:Summary is misleading... by milletre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uhhhm, yes, the _crackers_ that crack viruses deserve no respect. Uhhhm, yes, the crackers that expose mal/spyware deserve no respect. Yes, the crackers that crack commercial drivers to find out how hardware should be programmed deserve no respect. Etc, to infinity.



      Please, let's leave race out of this.

    9. Re:Summary is misleading... by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps the easiest way to access the cellular network is via the microwave link they normally have on each cell site. The transmission from there is typically just a standard T1, 24 channels, few bits of overhead - a couple of channels handle the SS7, the rest are devoted to the (unencrypted) vocoders from each active mobile telephone.

      You can learn a lot just from the SS7 packet stream - including text messages and phone numbers, imsi's and other data (SS7 can get pretty complicated, it has a standard, but phone companies usually twist it a little for their own usage)

      There are codecs available online for most transmissions - GSM is usually a 16kbps signal, bust it out and it rasters at around 180 bits wide (from memory) - hook on to the sinc and feed it in to your demux real time - There are probably off the shelf scanners that do all of this these days.

      Those small microwave dishes are either pointed at an exchange, or another cell site - find one going to an exchange and you'll get more data to sift through. They transmit at around about 2GHz so you'll need a receiver, downconverter, modem, and some type of capture card for your trusty little portable Pee Cee.

      Not cheap, but not impossible. (Make sure to buy two of each or you'll be marked as a 'spy' or terrorist straight off the bat) All of this stuff can fit in to one of those silver metal camera cases.

      I'm not making any of this up either :-)

    10. Re:Summary is misleading... by ozbon · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if he'd hacked into Nokia and deleted "the Nokia ringtone", he'd have been awarded next year's Nobel Peace Prize. *grin*

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    11. Re:Summary is misleading... by ozbon · · Score: 1

      In most media terminology a "sophisticated" hacker is just someone who doesn't only know how to run Windows and MS Office...

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    12. Re:Summary is misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even just wiping out the "Crazy Frog" ringtone has gotta be worth a knighthood or something...

    13. Re:Summary is misleading... by mwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It is one thing to crack into a network. Stealing social security numbers and personal photos is another, however."

      Yes, it is. One is burglary; the other is copyright infringement.

    14. Re:Summary is misleading... by falser · · Score: 1

      Whereas if he'd managed to use the intrustion to delete every single custom ringtone off every connected mobile he would have been sainted. :)

      You obviously haven't heard the 'default' ringtone on T-mobile phones. You know that ring at the end of their commercials... yeah, that's it.

    15. Re:Summary is misleading... by Broiler · · Score: 1

      ...for being able to pull it off...
      He did not pull it off...he was caught.

      --
      My sigs offend the max # of people all over the world, regardless of race, religion, color, sex or creed. It's a gift.
    16. Re:Summary is misleading... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Stealing my toaster is burglary; stealing my identity is copyright infringement. Using my toaster is cooking; using my identity is... burglary?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Summary is misleading... by mwood · · Score: 1

      "Using my toaster is cooking; using my identity is... burglary?"

      Fraud. See how much easier it is to talk about these things when we call them by familiar names? Inserting a computer doesn't make it something totally new, any more than the invention of firearms turned murder into something new.

      The only part that's still sticky is taking information, because nobody ever broke into anyone's house to make and carry away a copy of his toaster. Wait...espionage?

    18. Re:Summary is misleading... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      When I use your CC#, SSN and bank PIN to pay for my skis and snowboard, have I burgled you? Or just defrauded the bank?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    19. Re:Summary is misleading... by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. If A uses B's "CC#, SSN and bank PIN" without authorization by B, then A has stolen money from B and defrauded the bank as well (having obtained services from the bank under false pretenses, and making them liable for B's loss). He's also defrauded the merchant. A is in a whole lotta trouble, if caught.

      At least, that's the way I see it -- if you want a legal opinion, buy one from a lawyer.

      This brings up an interesting point. We actually do have long experience, in law, with the taking of "virtual property". Forging a check, for example, gives the forger possession of money which rightly belongs to someone else, even though the money may never have existed as physical coin or currency. Much of the money circulating today never existed in the physical world. This blows another hole in the argument that taking someone's information is fundamentally different from taking his silver candlesticks.

    20. Re:Summary is misleading... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I agree with all you've said - "cyberlaw' is usually just lawyers and journalists creating new laws and decisions diverging from the case law developed in a different time, when justice was more consistent. Except the last part, where stealing info is [not] different from stealing candlesticks. Stealing the info is different, because it's just creating the threat of stealing candlesticks. It's more like stealing keys, if they're an extra set. It's a crime, and the threat destroys the value of security investments like locks (and, some would argue, walls). But it's not the same as executing the threat. From the rest of what you posted, I'm not sure you really meant that bit about info/candlestick equivalence.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  3. About the candid photos.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Are any of them of Lindsey Lohan in the shower?
    2. If so, does anyone have a link?

    mmmm...soapy....

    Is there such a thing as Samurai Porn? Yes. Yes there is.

  4. Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Rape in prison is an ugly reality that most people have learned to ignore, but prisoner rape is an institutionalized form of cruelty that infringes upon basic human rights, contributes to the spread of disease, and perpetuates violence both inside and outside of prison walls.

    One out of every 140 people in the United States is now behind bars, the highest rate of any industrialized nation. Today, nearly 2 million people are serving time, and more than 10 million separate admissions to and discharges from prisons and jails occurred in 1999 alone.

    The risks associated with sexual assault in prison, however, extend beyond prison walls. Families, loved ones, and the general public are affected by the debilitating and sometimes dangerous aftermath of prisoner rape. Upon release, rape survivors may bring with them emotional scars, sexually transmitted infections, and learned violent behavior that continue the cycle of harm.

    1. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1 out of 140? That number is something like 2 in ten for black americans too, right?

      Why do we have so many more prisoners? Is it the drug war bringing 100 teens off the street everyday or something?

    2. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sorry if this sounds a little naive, but how would you prevent prisoner rape, short of placing everyone into solitary confinement? Isn't it kind of unavoidable in that kind of environment? How do other countries handle the problem?

    3. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it is going to happen to some extent anywhere, but the thing is that there seems to be a culture of tolerance and acceptance of it in the States. It's expected. I can never believe that rape is something that is just casually joked about in the US. Also, many states have severe overcrowding with understaffed and undertrained security. That certainly doesn't help.

    4. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by mboverload · · Score: 1
      In the states "bubba" is the person that is refered to as commiting the rape. In many high-profile criminal cases people joke about them getting raped in prison, they accept it as part of the punishment. For example, just a few days ago I heard:

      "Scott Peterson may have killed his wife, but I hear he just got a new one in jail"

    5. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      by offering them a chance to wank off instead of turning into raping each other? by making it less accepted, making the prisons less overcrowed? with that attitude, why do you mind about rapes outside of prison?

      you know, it's not really civil to punish one from selling crack by few years in prison and 88 assrapes - it would be considered quite uncivilised if it was said out loud like that in court(it would be torture! or death sentence if you manage to get hiv). for a country that prides on having standard freedom and rights for all it's quite backwards to be thinking that you lose them the second someone deems you guilty.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry if this sounds a little naive, but how would you prevent prisoner rape

      Switch to powered soap.

    7. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the states "bubba" is the person that is refered to as commiting the rape. In many high-profile criminal cases people joke about them getting raped in prison, they accept it as part of the punishment.

      In the UK, high-profile inmates usually opt for solitary confinement.

    8. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Inda · · Score: 1

      88 assrapes? You'd never eat Chicken Kiev again, that's for sure.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    9. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how would you prevent prisoner rape, short of placing everyone into solitary confinement?
      I've heard that in some asian countries (possibly due to religious preferences of the country?) homosexuality is so hated that if you try that in gaol, the other prisoners kill you.

    10. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by mi · · Score: 1, Interesting
      In addition to the righteous methods already mentioned (improving staffing, reducing overcrowding), how about allowing conjugal visits?

      Even Soviet GULAGs allowed them (albeit, very rarely and only to spouses).

      They should be a privilege, of course, to be -- like all other privileges -- denied as a punishment, when warranted...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    11. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Cigarra · · Score: 0

      You there are no conjugal visits in US prisons? Man, that's cruel!

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    12. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, just a few days ago I heard: "Scott Peterson may have killed his wife, but I hear he just got a new one in jail"

      Actually, wouldn't that make *him* the wife?

    13. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by runamok1 · · Score: 1
      Yeah. I wrote this:

      People forget that our country was based on the idea that a thousand guilty should go free rather than one innocent be sacrificed.

      Somewhere along the way "think of the kids" and media hysteria took over our better moral instincts.

      It seems fine to say that those thousand guilty will hurt 10,000 MORE innocent people and the 1 innocent is a worthy cost of a working system.

      That is until YOU'RE the innocent.

      It would seem that being sodomized in prison would be a bit more than "cruel and unusual". I wonder why the prison system has never been sued into oblivion...

      One more bleeding heart liberal comment and I'm done. The fact that we (by we I mean it's an accepted fact in our culture) all think people get abused in prison and we send a crap load of non-violent offenders there is a damn tragedy.

    14. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the problem -- the jokes are being used to mask a very serious problem. There is a tacitly accepted culture of prisoner abuse in the US. I can't help but think that this encourages abuses like those seen at Abu Ghraib.

    15. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      New Readers' Digest article out next month:

      I am Nicholas Lee Jacobsen's Anal Orifice

      "Life for me used to be fairly routine. I passed a turd once or twice a day and some gas more often, and once every couple of weeks Nick's kinky girlfriend would stick her finger inside me and make me feel very good. But ever since Nick got busted for hacking cellphones, its been like Grand Central Station for me. In place of the loving caresses I used to get, now all I get are penises. In and out, in and out, in and out, for hours at a time sometimes. Humongous black ones, tiny white ones, uncircumsized brown ones, yellow ones with studs ... you name it, I've seen it whiz by. Its almost like Nick has just given up and is actually trying to abrade me into oblivion. It sucks being Nick's anal orifice."

      The End

    16. Re:Get a clue, idiot. by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 1

      Something along the lines of a death sentence for or mandatory castration of the offender might go a long way to curb the problem. Not sure that I'd completely advocate either but since you were soliciting suggestions, there you go.

  5. Few thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I recall, he wasn't picked up in the Operation Firewall sweep (although he would have been), instead, he turned himself in several days before the arrests.

    Secondly, the maximum five year/$250,000 fine thing is standard for a single felony. In all likelyhood he will get MUCH less, especially because he cooperated and plead guilty.

    1. Re:Few thoughts by digitalchinky · · Score: 0, Troll

      And in other news, US politicians want the NSA to start sucking down everyone's email and cell phone messages.... Without conviction... Go figure.

    2. Re:Few thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Crack a network
      2. Plead guilty.
      3. Take it up the ass for three years.
      4. Find a job as a top-paid security consultant.
      5. PROFIT.

      Must be working great for gay men.

  6. Secret Service! by mboverload · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Nicholas Lee Jacobsen accessed US Secret Service email...

    Why the hell are the secret service sending unencrypted emails (!!!) other a PUBLIC, wireless phone system. I don't like our president or anything, but he deserves more than some hack jobs practically advertising themselves to the world.

    1. Re:Secret Service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he deserves alot more ;), how about a public flogging

    2. Re:Secret Service! by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was of the understanding that the secret service had two email systems, one for communication with the general public, and one internal - secure - system.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    3. Re:Secret Service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Secret Service doesn't just protect the president. They also police money fraud(ie counterfeiting), since they are part of the US Treasury dept. A large amount of their work isn't classified.

    4. Re:Secret Service! by digitalchinky · · Score: 5, Informative

      A great deal of inter-organisation banter is considered 'unclassified' so it makes sense to use public systems that are already in place - saves money all round. Also workers will send personal stuff like banking and email to friends and family, it's got to leave the 'secret service' building somewhere.

      I seriously doubt he got anything hard core. Air Gap - (and no, I did not say WiFi gap)

    5. Re:Secret Service! by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Informative

      since they are part of the US Treasury dept

      Used to be part of the treasury dept. They are now DHS

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    6. Re:Secret Service! by ckedge · · Score: 1

      No, he got hard core stuff.

      If you read the article, you'd realize that the sole source for his Secret Service intel was from the one agent that was admonished/punished a month or so ago for doing highly sensitive things on his mobile device - compromising the data and allowing it all to get into the hands of this one hacker.

    7. Re:Secret Service! by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      100% of my work isn't classified, but I know better than to throw secrets around unencrypted.

      Setting aside what the President may or may not deserve, *we* deserve better from the people who work for us.

    8. Re:Secret Service! by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      I assure you they don't. The incident was about one agent that didn't listen to all the memos from the IT staff about not fowarding emails outside the office.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  7. Operation Firewall by mboverload · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is an article about Operation Firewall. Interesting that wikipedia does not yet have an entry on it... http://www.viruslist.com/en/news?id=154205192

    1. Re:Operation Firewall by kers · · Score: 1

      Feel free to write an wikipedia article about it yourself - thats the way it supposed to work yo :D

    2. Re:Operation Firewall by mboverload · · Score: 1

      Working on it right now =)

  8. Better article by mboverload · · Score: 4, Informative
    This article has WAY more information. Great read

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/12/hacker_pen etrates_t-mobile/

  9. Punish him constructively by [cx] · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Make him work unpaid with only room and board as a slave for T-Mobile as a security technician.

    Oh yeah..slavery...

    I guess it's not such a good idea, but without the bad past of slavery, but incarceration is just a waste of money, when he could be using his "talent" positively. By forcing them to atone for their crimes perhaps they will learn the error of their ways by dealing with (in this case) people trying to crack the same security network he is now trying to secure.

    Monitor him, which will probably cost less than the prison fees. He is not a danger to society, he is just simply someone who overstepped their legal boundary. I believe prison should be for violent criminals. Not that he will go to a real tough prison.

    But if he screws up in the program outside of prison as rehabilitation, then he would be sent to a maximum security prison to serve the sentence to the end.

    [cx]

    1. Re:Punish him constructively by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      He is not a danger to society

      I don't know if it was mentioned in this article, but I've read others about this case. This guy was trying to sell subscribers' credit card and social security numbers and you call that "not a danger to society." That's pretty dangerous to society, or have you never heard of identity theft?

    2. Re:Punish him constructively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually putting people to work for a crime isn't considered slavery. For one thing, people can be sentenced to community service. Additionally, people imprisoned can be made to work in "chain gangs".

      The system could be made more flexible by enabling people to actually perform skilled work they're qualified for.

    3. Re:Punish him constructively by dqbiggerfam · · Score: 1

      Accoriding to the article, HE DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO CREDITCARD NUMBERS. "Jacobsen had access to some customers' Social Security numbers and dates of birth, voicemail PINs, and the passwords providing users with web access to their T-Mobile email accounts. He did not have access to credit card numbers."

    4. Re:Punish him constructively by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn another article said he had access to credit card numbers.

      Needless to say, in another post, I linked to a statement that he offered to sell social security numbers and other critical information about customers which would allow someone to steal said person's identity.

  10. He now works for the secret service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maximum of five years and a $250,000 fine is the maximum for a single felony. From the previous article:

    The same source also offers an explanation for the secrecy surrounding the case: the Secret Service, the source says, has offered to put the hacker to work, pleading him out to a single felony, then enlisting him to catch other computer criminals in the same manner in which he himself was caught. The source says that Jacobsen, facing the prospect of prison time, is favorably considering the offer.

    It seems that a surefire way to get a job tracking down criminals for the government is to get arrested for committing crimes, a bummer for us regular folk :(

    1. Re:He now works for the secret service by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 1

      It used to be standard bahaviour (apparently) to use hackers to catch hackers. I knew people in the 80s who were busted by the phone company here in the Land of OZ and were hired by said company to catch the other hackers. Don't forget that hacker slang even used to have a phrase for hackers who are caught and used by THEM to catch other hackers.

      Incidently, the word is "narq".

      --
      99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    2. Re:He now works for the secret service by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      When they say "working for the secret service", that means basically finding other thieves and turning them over for prosecution. He ain't getting a gun and a badge.

  11. T-Moblile by victorhooi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hi, Is it just me, or does somebody at Slashdot have a personal vendeta against The Society for Correct Spelling? *rolls eyes* It's happened so many times in the past few weeks that I was starting to think it was intentional, some clever attempt to subvert the Establishment and show how progressive they are....or, maybe I'm over-analysing it.... Anyway, back to the topic - I wonder if the FBI will cut a spill-the-beans deal with him? I mean, breaking into a major telco...that's gotta be worth at least a couple of hacker brownie points... bye, Victor

    1. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's "vendetta"

      HTH
      The Society For Correct Spelling.

    2. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot a period.

      The Society for Correct Punctuation.

    3. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....too many periods....

      The Society for Premature Metopause

    4. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many replies.

      The Society for the Beating of Dead Horses

    5. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. A girl on Slashdot.

      Let me check behind my back... noooo, no pigs are flying.

    6. Re:T-Moblile by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Hi, Is it just me, or does somebody at Slashdot have a personal vendeta against The Society for Correct Spelling?

      It wasn't a spelling error. The person who typed "T-Moblile" didn't do so because they didn't know how to spell it. It was a typo. An error, but of a different kind.

      What you should be talking about is The Society for Correct Editing.

    7. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even bother to read what you just posted? Good job "Victor," your typo-filled bitching about spelling is easily the most idiotic thing I've seen in the past five minutes.

    8. Re:T-Moblile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much violence against animals. Signed, PETA

  12. But most importantly... by paulschroeder · · Score: 2

    ...will we be seeing the 'candid' photos? It's not like Paris Hilton and her ilk could embarrass themselves any further.

    1. Re:But most importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Paris Hilton being seen naked is embarrassing to her, I'd love to see what you look like naked.

  13. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUNNY: Cracker = whitey. Black faceplates = black people whitey cracks on. Get a fucking clue, mods.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, now I get it. But wait - it's still not funny.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, now I get it. But wait - it's still not funny.

      It's a little bit funny. But not quite enough to get me to metamod as unfair.

  14. Standard Slashdot Responses... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • He was a "private security researcher."
    • He never stole anything
    • People like him do the world a service by exposing the weaknesses of such systems (to.. uhh.. people like him).
    • 5 years! Compare this to $LESSERSENTENCEDCRIME.
    1. Re:Standard Slashdot Responses... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      He tried to sell subscribers' social security numbers. He's pretty dangerous. If you claim not, you're a moron, plain and simple.

      Here he tries to sell materials from an ongoing federal investigation that he accessed through the break-in
      Here he tries to sell social security numbers and other identifying information so others can steal those identities.

    2. Re:Standard Slashdot Responses... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Only now do I realize you were being facetious.

  15. 'Honest, Judge... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought I was accessing my WiFi AP. Its SSID was T-Moblile!"

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:'Honest, Judge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good thing he hacked T-Moblile. If he'd hacked T-Mobile he'd have been in a lot more trouble ;-)

  16. no way, jose by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    he should go to jail. why reward bad behavior? it is about ethics, about right and wrong. the hacking was wrong, now he is going to jail.

    better yet, pass a law that says anyone convicted of a computer crime can't work with computers. something like what they do with criminals who harm children. laws make it illegal for them to work or be around children.

    even with driving privliges, after so many tickets, they will take a drivers license away.

    oh, about your statement that incarceration is a waste of money, no it is not. it keeps these animals out of mainstream society, and after their sentance is done, they will still be in databases so we know who they are. that is the real value. employers can weed them out. better colleges can make admissions more difficult. neighborhoods can make living there difficult. it is all about punishment. no more three strikes and you're out. i say, fuck up once, and that is it.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:no way, jose by mboverload · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No way. Even for a hacker restricting computer use is WAY too far. Computers are a part of life that one can not avoid. It would be like restricting the use of the kitchen because you hurt someone with a knife.

      As for your comment about fuck up once and your out, keep in mind many convictions are of innocent people. Also, the only way to start to get these people into society is to get them JOBS! Give them a meaning to life and a way to support it. I know I would want help if I ever fell into crime. To humans purpose is extremely important. Onc eyour in jail long enough you just loose all sense of that. I had an uncle in prision and he told me all about how it screws with your mind. He is now legit and all, but some of it still lingers.

    2. Re:no way, jose by m50d · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Forced labour would hardly be "rewarding" what he did. It's just punishing him in a way that gives more benefit to the rest of society.

      And I think you're being excessively hard. If that's how things should work, why don't we just execute everyone, first time, for any crime? We believe people can be reformed, that they should go to prison or do community work or pay a fine, somehow pay their debt to society, and then be allowed to start over.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:no way, jose by Delphinios · · Score: 1

      They tried that with Westley, and it didn't work. The Stupid Interdimentional Sky God let him go.

      Damn Picard's extremely high Charisma Modifier!

    4. Re:no way, jose by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      Why does society punish? For revenge? Or for self protection?
      I think the goal is to rehabilitate the individual for him to become a useful member of society.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    5. Re:no way, jose by mwood · · Score: 1

      I recall a story...some fellow had jiggered a computer to embezzle a big stack of money. On conviction, the authorities jiggered his *brain* so that he couldn't look at a computer without getting headaches and dizziness, couldn't touch one without minor pain. The fellow couldn't even feed himself, because all the restaurants and stores were computerized -- he had to beg strangers to use his credit card for him. The authorities saw to it that he could always buy what he needed, but he was incapable of making the transaction with his own hands.

      Was that right? was that wrong?

    6. Re:no way, jose by KevinKnSC · · Score: 1

      Right or wrong, it sounds like a much less entertaining version of "A Clockwork Orange."

  17. he belongs in jail, don't you think? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    who cares if he stole something or not. he invaded the privacy of other people. this reminds me of a guy back in college. about a month after moving in the dorms, i was stuck in the elevator with this guy. on the way up he was snickering and laughing, and finally let out a "you won't believe this... you have to come to my room". this guy was a loner, and a bit of a weirdo. but i figured fuck it, and went to see what he had. it was a big ass radio which could be tuned to listen in on wireless phones. he had it attached to a tape deck. his room also smelled like stale cigarettes and weed. it truns out his hobby was to smoke weed and listen in on peoples personal conversations. so i did what i knew was right, i took away his radio and told him if i ever caught him listening in on other people, i would call the police. i also took all his tapes, and told him to get into drug rehab.

    i think i saved that kids life.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:he belongs in jail, don't you think? by know1 · · Score: 0

      oh my god i think you just might be retarded. all he was doing was a little harmless fun for a start. like peeking through security cameras. nobody is hurt, until someone with a rod up their ass gets all menstrual about it. however i'm sure that last remark was flamebait so i will go on to my main point. WEED IS NOT HEROIN OR CRACK ffs. he does not need drug rehab. if alcohol were discovered today and judged on the amount of damage it does to you and how addictive it is, it would be a class A drug. weed (here in England) is only a class C drug, the same classification as a prescription drug. pull your head out of your ass and start to think without prejudice

    2. Re:he belongs in jail, don't you think? by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      You're such a good patriot. Uncle Sam should be proud.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    3. Re:he belongs in jail, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John that never happened.

    4. Re:he belongs in jail, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am writing this from a state sponsered penatenetiry internet project. John, after having my radio and tapes taken away I found I was hooked on voyeruism and decided to set up an exstensive tapping system on the appartment blocks around my neighbourhood. With the increased voyuer experience I discovered that a cocktail of Heroin and LSD would be more appropriate. I was eventually discovered because I was so high on a mixture of LSD and Heroin that my landlord was unable to contact me about my rent so he broke my door down, discovering me in my ultimate voyeuristic state. He took me to the authorities who put me in jail for 15 years for drug abuse and invasion of privacy charges. I was happy just listening to phone conversations and smoking a little dope. Now the only voyeurism I can do is listening into other prisoners talk about whether or not they should ass pound me tonight. You ruined my life!

  18. ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by cheekyboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    How ironic since the FED actually owns the money and its a 100% combo of 12 corp banks (most none american)

    Now through lending practices and credit, over 7% of the GDP in M3 money supply is made each year out of thin air , nothing. Now tell me that isnt legalized complex (oh its business) way of counterfeiting money. ie 700billion yearly.

    If you want to steal $$$, dont, just setup your own bank www.caymanco.com for $50k, and start 'lending' out 9x your capital to your own 'fake' businesses aswell as real ones, before you know it, you'll have so much moeny you will be part of the boys club.

    Wall street are the biggest theifs in history, its just that its day2day business that looks legit that its allowed. When everyone is part of the scam, then no one believes there is a scam.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      All your dollars are worth-less.... buy gold now @ kitco.com

      If my dollars are worthless why are you going to give me gold for them?

    2. Re:ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Informative

      *buzzer* Wrong.

      Sorry you fail at finace.

      http://wfhummel.cnchost.com/banklending.html

      Basically the bank lends money out of the money deposited in it. It has to keep a certain amount of liquid cash availible, but it can actually have less on hand cash then it has money in its accounts. This is done by having the banks borrow money from the FED. If you were to try your scheme you would quickly find yourself out luck when the Fed refused to loan you any more money and called in your debt plus interest.

      Banking like anything else in a market economy a giant balancing act between supply and demand. The money "made out of thin air" is called profit. Its this wonderful concept of when you have something worth less to you than someone else is willing to pay you for it, both of you make money. Since the other guy would have paid more somewhere else and you would have taken less somewhere else.

      In this case it is refered to as "interest on funds loaned". You make a loan in expectance of it being paid back with interest, and people loan you money expecting you to pay them back with interest.

      At least you are right on your last point. To scam involves gaining money at someone else's expense. If everybody gains then there is no scam. Just as there is none here.

    3. Re:ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generosity?

      Gullibllity?

      Machism?

    4. Re:ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Assuming his Cayman "Your Banks R Us" website really does produce Fed-recognized banks on demand (for a $50K deposit), couldn't I just create one of those banks, and borrow money from the Fed at the Prime Rate, and use it to, say, buy a house? Paying my mortgage at the Prime Rate, instead of the marked-up rate? If so... does that website really deliver?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Its just a scam. He will grab your money and run.

      The Fed does tons of research on banks before they approve them. If they don't like the structure of your charter or if you don't do enough business they will simply deny you out of hand.

    6. Re:ironic, bank lending = counterfeting by guck · · Score: 1

      Why, to buy more gold of course.

  19. Throw the book at him... by ttys00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... and hope nobody realises that if this guy can read secret service emails by himself, foreign government intelligence agencies (ie. whatever the KGB is called these days) with more resources and more staff must be finding it laughably easy.

    1. Re:Throw the book at him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh dear god! Foreign Nationals can read DECLASSIFIED interdepartmental e-mails from the Secret Service!

      Meanwhile, anything of importance isn't sent OVER THE AIR, UNENCRYPTED...

  20. Jokes are funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting hit in the head with a sledgehammer would really suck most of the fun out of my day. But I laugh when it happens to Moe, and he takes it out on Larry and Curly.

    It's being close to the pain that hurts. An since we're the most highly evolved predators on this gap between celestial impacts, there's a lot of pain. And while they're nothing wrong with being empethetic, wallowing in the ocean of misery that's out there can make a person insane. So, step back and laugh at it once in a while, and you know what, it doesn't seem so scary or hopeless.

    We've got holocaust jokes. A clever turn of phase about turning of an asshole's cheeks once in a while isn't going to diminish our species. It's a small revenge on the poor judgement and character of those who plague us. He's fortunate in a way that we're so evolved as to simply laugh at his misfortune. Not to long ago we'd be all too quick to lend our own torches or stones too it. It's cathartic and a small joy that deprives no one of anything. Let people have their reindeer games and you can free up your conscience for worrying about the real evils, such as actual prison rape.

    Samurai Porn? It's the internet after all....

  21. loooks lkie he aslo by beef3k · · Score: 0, Troll

    h4xxored teh slashdot spelchekcer!

  22. Re:Bad typo in *the first word of the headline*??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    You beat me to it.

    -1, spelling flame

  23. Spelling! by dmp123 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is this a "How subtle a spelling error can we get in an article title" competition?

    You didn't get it past me, muhahaha..

    "T-Moblile Cracker Pleads Guilty"
    Nice try though!

    David

  24. I say let him go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He may have had malicious intent but he turned himself in, he exposed yet again the crummy security of big companies. Let him go with a tap on the hand.

  25. bout time by scriptie+the+kid · · Score: 0

    Well finally the mans starting to send some of ya'll crackers up the river too. We could use summore a dem tight cracka asses in here. Shit we just been passin round the same 3 honkeys for like months already, I could damm near get a carton of smokes for dat new kid.

    --
    I for one welcome our new vengeful sith overlords.
  26. A mere pittance by QCompson · · Score: 5, Funny

    $250,000? That's nothing! At least he wasn't caught sharing four or five songs...

  27. why hackers get caught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only real reason why hackers get caught is because they always have to boast about what they have done.

  28. Writing bad checks=prison and possibly RAPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't underestimate the horrors that happen in U.S. prisons. People have gotten sent to jails for writing bad checks or having a baggie of pot on them, and ended up getting gang raped.

  29. Re:no way, jose : mod: +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod: +1

  30. Enlightenment by shufler · · Score: 1
    Uhhhm, yes, the _crackers_ that crack viruses deserve no respect. Uhhhm, yes, the crackers that expose mal/spyware deserve no respect. Yes, the crackers that crack commercial drivers to find out how hardware should be programmed deserve no respect. Etc, to infinity.
    Crack viruses? Crackers exposing spyware? Cracking commercial hardware? What are you going on about?

    From the Jargon File:

    hacker (n): 1. A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary. RFC1392, the Internet Users' Glossary, usefully amplifies this as: A person who delights in having an intimate understanding of the internal workings of a system, computers and computer networks in particular.

    8. [deprecated] A malicious meddler who tries to discover sensitive information by poking around. Hence password hacker, network hacker. The correct term for this sense is cracker.

    cracker (n): One who breaks security on a system. Coined ca. 1985 by hackers in defense against journalistic misuse of hacker (q.v., sense 8 [above]). ... Thus, there is far less overlap between hackerdom and crackerdom than the mundane reader misled by sensationalistic journalism might expect. Crackers tend to gather in small, tight-knit, very secretive groups that have little overlap with the huge, open poly-culture this lexicon describes; though crackers often like to describe themselves as hackers, most true hackers consider them a separate and lower form of life. An easy way for outsiders to spot the difference is that crackers use grandiose screen names that conceal their identities. Hackers never do this; they only rarely use noms de guerre at all, and when they do it is for display rather than concealment.
    1. Re:Enlightenment by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe someone needs to inform the media that ESR has decided to deprecate the term they're using.

      I think they're more likely to keep using a real dictionary, though.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  31. DICTION IS CORRECT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YAY!!!! Someone is getting it right this time.
    Cracker = Computer User with malicious intent(tm)
    Hacker = Happy fun analyzer, and builder of systems

  32. Cat's out of the bag by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

    "Sources say the hacker was also able to download candid photos taken by Sidekick users, including Hollywood celebrities, which were shared within the hacking community."

    Where are these photos?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  33. Parent not a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now he will have his butt cracked

    Am I the only one who read this as a joke about butt phones, the diagnostic telephones carried by phone company technitians?

    As well, obviously, as being about prison sex. The juxtaposition of the two meanings gives rise to the humor, as always. Guess its too obscure for most ppl (or Im just leaping to false conclusions)

  34. Way by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    It's about practical living in our society. We spend $30-40K:y average on incarceration. Afterwards, especially with the detailed and thoroughly used recordkeeping you're talking about, the ex-con has little alternative but to steal or otherwise commit crime to survive. Even with alternatives, keeping them in jail, punishing them, with only other criminals to turn to for society, cranks out more and harder criminals. They're people, not animals, so they can always be made worse by abusing them.

    I say, encourage "good behavior" by giving every kid who graduates high school on time a $1000 bonus, no strings attached. Give every kid who graduates in the top 50% of their class an extra $1000. If it keeps an extra 1% out of jail, it pays for itself. Not to mention the savings in spared damage from skipped crime, and the extra production from educated noncriminals. The actual numbers probably just have to be something like 0.1% fewer criminals to pay for itself.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  35. the time to fight back is NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His only CRIME was CURIOSITY!
    Information wants to BE FREE! FREEDOM!

    This man should be placed on a pedestal as he is a FREEDOM FIGHTER against the oppressive CORPORATIONS!

    Only in AMERIKKKA would he be sent to jail.

    You can kill the revolutionaries, but you can't kill the REVOLUTION!

  36. I work for T-Mobile and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He broke into our vendor's network, Danger/Hiptop. All information he gleaned was from their network. He gained minimum access to the real T-Mobile network. Nothing on the My Tmobile site was accessable to him, including the photo albums.

  37. New system needs to integrate ispell! by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    I tend to get pissy with people who are too anal about spelling (particularly in people's posts) -- but in the article itself, it's pretty unprofessional. Would it be that difficult to have articles run through ispell before they can be posted?

  38. Here is the Court Case Affidavit by ggreggorw · · Score: 1

    Great Read - Scroll straight to Page 20. http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:DVOASBgoZ8EJ: www.4law.co.il/jacob2.pdf+Peter+Cavicchia&hl=en