Slashdot Mirror


Blockbuster Sued Over Late Fees Claim

DesiVideoGamer writes "CNN has a story about Blockbuster's violation of New Jersey's consumer fraud act in which they made false claims in their "No More Late Fees" campaign. New Jersey Attorney General Peter Harvey filed a lawsuit today in hopes that Blockbuster would stop misleading their customers into thinking they could keep their movie rentals as long as they want without penalty."

48 of 650 comments (clear)

  1. Price Point by Klar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These services seem like good deals on the outside, but when you really look at the prices they charge, better deals can be found elsewhere. I'd like to see a decline in the high priced rental stores like Blockbuster, and a move to lower priced store with good selection. In my town, there are several small convenience stores that do very good business renting DVD's for cheap prices($2 Canadian after tax compared to the $6ish the Blockbuster charges). One store in particular always has many copies of all the new movies, plus tons of older ones. Plus, having the movies at a convenience store gives the added benefit of a large variety of snack foods to fill up on.

    1. Re:Price Point by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I stopped going to Blockbuster and Rogers Video after I found out that they perform their own censoring and scene-removal on films.

      Well, you are pretty stupid then because they don't do that.

      The worst Blockbuster has done is refuse to carry NC-17/unrated versions and thus put pressure for the studios to release R-rated cuts. IN the last year or two, that policy seems to have ended as I've seen a number of NC-17 and unrated DVDs are corporate owned blockbusters, including "The Dreamers" and "Y Tu Mama Tambien" as well as more mainstream flicks like, "American Wedding Unrated," etc.

      Having never heard of Rogers Video I'm sure their miniscule presence in the rental market means that they don't have the resources to make their own cuts and they aren't big enough to really put any pressure on the studios either.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Rogers Video is the largest movie rental company in Canada and you are a moron.

    3. Re:Price Point by siliconjunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I stopped going to Blockbuster and Rogers Video after I found out that they perform their own censoring and scene-removal on films.

      Blockbuster does not actually censor the films themselves, but they are a powerful player and have exerted their influence in order to get directors to release "R" version of certain films rather than the "NC-17" unedited cut.

      However, I think you are wrong about Rogers. The Rogers Video on Lonsdale in North Vancouver has an adult video room with full fledged porn, so I'm fairly certain they are not cutting scenes from "Boogie Nights"

    4. Re:Price Point by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not true. Just proclaiming that don't doesn't make it so.

      You do realize the irony in your statement, right? I spent 10 minutes in google and google grou[s looking for supporting evidence of your claim about "Black Sheep" and not find a single mention of it.

      Did you compare the video of the Black Sheep you rented from Blockbuster with one from another source? Changes between the theaterical release to the official home video release happen all the time. For example, see Terminator 3 -- the widescreen DVD is missing boobies that were shown in the theater and are, oddly enough, on the fullscreen version (and it ain't open matte). But it doesn't matter if you got your DVD of T3 from BBV or Amazon, they are all the same content.

      So far lots of hearsay, but zero supporting evidence for the "censorship happens" side. This is an old urban legend that most likely is the result of confusing Wal-Mart's getting specially edited versions of music CDs and using guilt by association to apply the same reasoning to BBV's DVDs (BTW, while Wally World may still do this with the occasionally ultra-popular but 'offensive' CD, they have never done it with DVDs.)

      As I've purchased over 500 used DVDs from Blockbuster since 2000 I have just a little more knowledge of this topic than most.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Price Point by screwballicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For that matter, as far as movies go, call me crazy, but what ever happened to the public library? At present, if I want to watch any of hundreds of major titles, aside from Blockbuster and the rental chains, I have the option of taking it out from [i]either[/i] the downtown Toronto Public Library or the University of Toronto's A/V centre. How available a wide array of DVDs are through public channels will depend on where you are, no doubt, but here they're readily available.

    6. Re:Price Point by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Have you also compared a DVD rented from another source? Or purchased? If not, you're accusing Blockbuster when they likely have had nothing to do with it.

      Well the fact that I'm forced (they disable the menu button) to sit through 5 minutes of advertisements for other recent releases on a Blockbuster rental proves that they do some modification to the film and it is not the same as a purchased DVD.

      Since they do that there is no guarantee that the content of the film isn't modified either.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    7. Re:Price Point by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You don't buy many DVDs do you? Forced previews have become all too common and it is not at all confined to rental DVDs - you get it on regular store-bought versions too - because they are THE SAME. Disney, especially, is notorious for doing it but they are far from alone in the practice.

      I'm not a crazy collector but I do have a fair number of DVD's that I've bought. The only ones that I remember with advertisements have been the Disney ones.

      Could be because I'm in Canada and we have our own manufacturers and distributors. They simply may not put the advertisements on, whereas Blockbuster movies with ads probably all get shipped from the U.S.

      Interestingly, I just happened to have 3 Blockbuster rentals with me. The two that look like they come from U.S. distributors have forced commercials, while the one with a Canadian distributor goes right to the menu. May be a coincidence, but maybe not.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  2. Well, it is worse-- by AEton · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apparently seven days after the due date, they charge you the full sale price of the rented item.

    You then have 30 days to return the item for a full refund - minus restocking fees (and tax?).

    Yuck!

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:Well, it is worse-- by aztektum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're telling me that you can take the time to browse their selection, wait in line to check out and sit on the movie anywhere from 14 to 44 days, but you can't find 5 seconds in that time to slip it back in their drop box?

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    2. Re:Well, it is worse-- by anethema · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm really confused, what's your problem? People like you are gonna ruin this great deal for the rest of us.

      You can keep the movie for 7 days in ADDITION to the normal rental time of the movie. Then, after that seven days, you have 30 days (from the orignal rental date) to return it only beeing charged 1.25$ restocking fee.

      Before this, you kept the movies for their rental times then the big late charges piled up. For the price of keeping it one day, you've already got more fees on your account than keeping it up to one month with the new system.

      How much do you think you'd pay for a movie keeping a new release 30 days with the old system? I bet it would be more than the movie is worth and you'd still have to return it. Now if you keep it that long, you've payed and you now own the movie.

      How you got +(x) informative for saying yuck to a deal that charges you signifigantly less money with no catches is beyond me.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    3. Re:Well, it is worse-- by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is the damn ads say NO LATE FEES...

    4. Re:Well, it is worse-- by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has nothing to do with lazy consumers or anything like that. All they are saying is that there are no more late fees. And there aren't any more late fees.

      Furthermore, the new policy IS more forgiving. In the absolute worst case scenario you pay the price of the DVD after 37 days. (And if you come back before those 37 days are up, guess what its $1.25. That has to be better (more forgiving) that the old policy).

      Now, I don't recall excatly the pricing of Blockbuster's old policy, but I don't think they stopped charging you late fees after 37 days, or ever (until you returned the video). And I'm sure after 37 days of not returning said tape you would have easily paid for the tape and then some (Feel free to whip out some numbers here if you want). They said no more late fees, you get no more late fees. They aren't trying to pull the wool over your eyes, they ARE being more forgiving.

      --
      Why not fork?
    5. Re:Well, it is worse-- by anethema · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes but in this case common sense dictates that you cant just keep their movie forever free of charge.

      That beeing said...

      This is a MUCH better deal than before, so to the fucking jerkoff suing them: "STOP IT"

      Despite the misleading ad, this is way better than before, and i dont want to lose it because of some whiney malcontents and a money grubbing lawyer.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    6. Re:Well, it is worse-- by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You're telling me that you can take the time to browse their selection, wait in line to check out and sit on the movie anywhere from 14 to 44 days, but you can't find 5 seconds in that time to slip it back in their drop box?
      I dunno. The ad that I saw on TV proclaimed "the end of late fees," to the point of unveiling a huge banner, and telling people "no more late fees." The ad featured a huge crowd of people rejoicing over the fact that there were no more late fees. The general idea was, "no more late fees." I don't see how anyone who saw the ad could have thought anything other than "hey, Blockbuster is eliminating late fees, kickass!"

      I never saw an ad that said "No more late fees as long as you return your rental within 3 days." I didn't see a commercial that said "Oh by the way, if you don't bring your movie back within a week, we'll charge you the retail price for that title." Nope. It was all about "no more late fees." That's what they advertised, and they aren't delivering.

      I'm not sure how the average consumer would see the ads other than the obvious interpretation. What I took from the ad campaign was that I don't have to pay a late fee, even if I can't find 5 seconds to return the video to Blockbuster. The ad campaign said no more late fees.

      If they're charging fees anyway, that seems rather gauche, and perhaps illegal. Don't you think?

      Maybe it's a good thing that I download instead of rent...
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    7. Re:Well, it is worse-- by Bellyflop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if it's a better deal or not. They can still offer the deal while changing their advertising. They are using it to reap profits and it's misleading and the cost is being borne by the consumer and competitors who are losing business.

  3. Why do we need a lawsuit? by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean if people today are so dumb that they think Blockbuster's commercials meant they could just keep rental movies forever then we have reached a new level of stupidity not equaled in quite a while.

    1. Re:Why do we need a lawsuit? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      With netflix you can... can't you?

      I think keeping a deposit equal to the max number of rentals for an account, and doing away with due dates, is a pretty good idea.

    2. Re:Why do we need a lawsuit? by ShamusYoung · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think keeping a deposit equal to the max number of rentals for an account, and doing away with due dates, is a pretty good idea.

      I agree (I love Netflix!), although it isn't as simple for them as just eliminating the fees.

      New releases cause a huge problem for brick-and-mortar rental places. In the store owner's perfect world, you have one copy each of 2,000 movies, and every night people come in and get the movies they want and leave. But 99% of your customers don't want on of your 2,000 movies. They want one of the three that just came out this week.

      Everyone wants to rent the latest movie on a Friday night, and then return it whenever they get around to it. So, when the latest Spielberg hits the shelves, you need to MAKE SURE you have a copy for everyone. People expect to be able to get the latest movies, and will get very pissed if you tell them you're out.

      Tonight, you need twenty copies of the latest movie. If you get those twenty back by tomorrow night you can rent them out again. If not, you need twenty more. The problem can get pretty out of control if you let people take the just-released title and keep it for a month. Then instead of twenty copies you need huge numbers of them.

      But next month nobody will care. You'll only need two copies, and you need to do something with those exta movies. They cost a lot. It costs a lot to store (storage space is precious!) and ship all those extra copies, and now nobody wants them and you're stuck with them. What's worse, those movies didn't really make you any more money. Having twice as many movies doesn't mean you rented it out twice as often, but instead they kept it twice as long. (Actually, most people returned it in a few days and a few absent-minded jerks like me held onto it for four times as long, but anyway...)

      The point is, longer rental times exacerbates the problem outlined above. Netflix gets around this by just making you wait for the latest release, which for whatever reason doesn't bother me. When I see "Long Wait" on Kill Bill 2 in Netflix, I shrug and the next movie in my Queue comes. When I go to the rental store and see 20 empty Kill Bill 2 cases and no copies left for me, I get annoyed. Go figure.

      --
      --This sig is in beta. Please let us know abut any errors you find.
    3. Re:Why do we need a lawsuit? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (if you keep more than 7 days past the return time, there is a restocking fee, but its a buck 25, who cares)

      Um, that's the new late fee.

  4. a way to purchase? by tsioc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm thinking that if they priced it right, this could be one way to sell dvd's and games. You can rent all you want, if you like it, keep it.

  5. Truth in advertising by Mistlefoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see.

    I can get a free cell phone almost anywhere. 3 years and $2000 later it's paid for.

    I can buy a car at 0% interest....but if I pay cash it's $$$thousands$$$ less than if I do credit.

    How come none of these advertisers are sued? Does the government really need to protect me against the cost of a DVD because I didn't read the fine print while ignoring far larger issues?

    1. Re:Truth in advertising by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can get a free cell phone almost anywhere. 3 years and $2000 later it's paid for.

      Because those ads tell you there's a contract required (usually just a 1 year contract, but hey the phone IS free, the service isn't.

      I can buy a car at 0% interest....but if I pay cash it's $$$thousands$$$ less than if I do credit.

      I'm going to assume that's because the car dealership is taking off the amount of money they'd be charged by the bank. Or they're giving you a discount equal to what you would have paid in interest so when they give you the total price it looks like 0% interest. And car dealerships always love cash because that means all the money from the sale is going to them and not partly to a bank over a period of 5 years (or at least that's my theory, although I do know for a fact that they love cash.)

      The way Blockbuster is advertising, you'd think you could keep a movie forever, and as long as you never try to rent another movie, will never be forced to pay anything or bring the movie back (I'm sure they'd call you and ask for it back though.) They could of just said "Now, rent the movie for 7 days!" with the fine print "After 7th day customer will be charged retail price for rental."

    2. Re:Truth in advertising by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on the car company, and when you buy. I got a 0% loan on a 2004 model car when they were trying to offload them because the 2005s were coming in a month. I negotiated the sale price first, then we talked financing. The final price never changed, regardless of if I was to buy it outright, do a large down payment, or nothing up front. So I opted for nothing up front, 0% over 5 years (they wouldn't go for six, dammit!) and that was that.
      I think they were a little shell shocked by how quickly I nailed everything down finances-wise because they tried to sell me on a stereo upgrade for "only $17 a month". Hmmm. $17 a month x 60 months. $1020 for an "upgrade"... I'm thinking.... no.

    3. Re:Truth in advertising by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does the government really need to protect me against the cost of a DVD because I didn't read the fine print while ignoring far larger issues?

      So where do you draw the line? Can an advertiser just advertise anything they want? Before this lawsuit even came up I myself commented on that commercial several times. Blockbusted does charge late fees. They just call it a "restocking fee". It's exactly the same as a late fee.

      To say that this is equivalent to a commercial for a free cell phone with cell phone service is not at all reasonable. First of all, as has been pointed out, a commercial advertising free cell phones will say that a service contract is required. Secondly, it is a common practice to offer a free product with the purchase of another. I just don't think the two are equivalent. If blockbusted advertised "NO LATE FEES when you buy the movie" then it'd be much less of a problem, and probably legal.

      I can buy a car at 0% interest....but if I pay cash it's $$$thousands$$$ less than if I do credit.

      Are you talking about getting thousands less through negotiation, or through an incentive program? In any case, it's only the same if the company actually charged you interest (but just called it a "money loan fee" or something). Is the reduced price of the car in the advertising? If not, then you can't really complain. If blockbusted actually offered no late fees, but just charged $25 for the DVD rental I don't see a problem, since they didn't advertise the price. But that's not what they've done. The deal is you rent the movie, and if you don't return it, then they charge you for it. Then, if you decide to return it after they charged you for it, they charge you a "restocking fee". How is that any different from a late fee? How is it any different from the usual process blockbuster uses? The only difference is they've extended the time before they charge the late fee.

  6. Oh really? by FireballX301 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, it IS a news-flash, you CANNOT keep movies you've rented, forever.

    But since when have advertising campaigns been free of ambiguity and deceit?

  7. The Blockbuster Plan from the horse's mouth! by MadWicKdWire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was at Blockbuster recently, the customer in front of me asked about the "the end of late fees". This is exactly what the employee told the customer, word for word...

    "This lets you keep the rental for a couple of days extra, just to allow you extra time."

    That was pretty much about it, nothing about the restocking fee, which was just appeared on their price list one day. Nothing about after 30 days, we charge your credit card on file for the rental value of the rental.

    The reason for the lawsuit is simple... they changed the way they do their rentals, because they suspect that you could accidentally forget aobut the rental and then keep it too long, but then since they will debit your credit card, by the time you find out, it's too late.

    Now, here is the problem, you were NEVER told about the restocking fee or the 30 days late we charge you. That is down right wrong. They should tell you EXACTLY what will happen. Even in the commerical, there are no little words at the bottom of the screen or some crazy fast talking guy.

    It's riding VERY close on false advertising, but it is the end of late fees... they just have restocking fees and purchase charges!

    THANK [Fill in god of your choice] FOR NETFLIX!!!

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)... oops
  8. A rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Forgive me for being a little off-topic here, but I've gotta rant about something I discovered after a recent rental at BlockBuster: UNSKIPPABLE TRAILERS.

    We don't have a lot of time for tv or movies, so it's probably been a year or so since we last rented a new release. Well, my wife came home the other day with Shrek II and some other relatively new release, so I popped Shrek in the DVD player. Up came the trailers, one after another, including like a 15 minute Ben Stiller advertisment for some animated movie he had a voice in. The whole time I'm sitting there trying to skip this nonsense, thinking I just don't know how to work this remote. Finally it occurred to me that maybe I wasn't just dense, but that I was being FORCED to watch the trailers.

    A few minutes on the Internet and my suspicions were confirmed -- the trailers were UNSKIPPABLE. In the meantime my wife had pulled the DVD out of the player to see if it was on the wrong side. Well guess what... YOU HAVE TO SIT THROUGH 20 MINUTES OF FUCKING TRAILERS AGAIN.

    I was pretty pissed off at this point, so I gave up on Shrek and popped the other disc in. SAME FUCKING BULLSHIT. Now I was furious, so took both of those fucking discs and drove them right back to Blockbuster. I returned them and ranted at the drone in the store (not like it accomplished anything, but I was pissed), considered calling my credit card company for a chargeback when they wouldn't refund my money, and in the end just gave up and picked out four OLD RELEASES from before they started doing this UNSKIPPABLE TRAILER BULLSHIT.

    Anyway, these are the last four movies I am ever fucking renting. FUCK the studios. I pay $5 for a fucking rental, I do NOT expect to have to sit through your fucking ads. And goddammit, if the power goes out or I have to turn off the player in the middle of the movie, I DO NOT WANT TO HAVE TO WATCH THE SAME FUCKING TRAILERS OVER AND OVER.

    From now on I boycott this bullshit. I am not a fucking puppet, and I am not going to be spammed after paying these bastards money. I can find my entertainment elsewhere. Blockbuster and the DVD makers have gotten their LAST FUCKING DOLLAR EVER out of me. Hope they enjoyed it...

    1. Re:A rant... by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're up to some fiddling, play DVD's on your PC with mplayer, or get a mythTV box going and (using it's internal DVD player/ripper module) jump straight to the movie, without the ads.

      Then, just for **extra spite value**, rip and compress it to your hard drive, so that every time you play it you can say, "Yeah! Take that Blockbuster, you FUCKERS!"

      That's what I do... and frankly, it feels good every time I do it.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  9. it's not stupidity by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those that say "to think you'd never have to return it", its not stupidity. Blockbuster specifically advertises on tv in prime time commercial slots NO LATE FEES, with no extra wording such as "Other details apply" or the ever lasting Read the Fine Print.

    Now with that in mind, if I actually used Blockbuster I would go in, and rent a new release movie for whatever X amount they charge. Now within common sense Blockbusters "NO LATE FEES" policy they have advertised, they CAN institute a policy that say within 30 days you must return the video, but within those 30 days you WILL NOT be charged late fees. And they could throw in some clause such as if the video is not returned, your account is forfiet. No late fees doesn't mean "keep forever" but it means that if you forget or just don't give a fuck like most common people when they rent a movie, you won't be penalized for it.

    Is that ok? No, of course not. People shouldn't automatically assume you can keep it forever after "Renting" it for $5. HOWEVER, Blockbuster is in the wrong here. They blatantly advertised NO LATE FEES. In their ads, they never mention you must sign up for some special monthy deal or pay a monthly fee, they just say NO LATE FEES. A nickel and dime lawyer could win this case of Faulty Advertisment in court quicker than OJ was aquited.

    --
    Aw Frell this
    1. Re:it's not stupidity by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you get charged, it's a RESTOCKING FEE to cover the price of shipping back the movie that they ordered to replace the one that your selfish ass kept for over a week past it's due date.

      Is there some kind of evidence you can point to as to what exactly the fee is covering? Unless you work in Blockbuster's corporate finance department, I don't think you can say with authority exactly *what* that fee pays for. I also don't imagine that after the 7 days is up, they automatically re-order another copy of whatever it is that you rented, especially if it's a low-demand item. They'd end up burying themselves in excess inventory if they did.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Re:Just Use Netflix by HardwareLust · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They suck now because they're just been completely overwhelmed by demand. The people at the top are too busy raking in the profits to worry about hiring enough people to give decent customer service, or expanding their distribution system. I quit because they were just getting slower and slower at checking it my returns and shipping new discs.

    Too bad, too. They had a hell of a company going at one time.

    --
    ...not that I'm a pirate.. Hell I've never even fired a cannon. - oldwolf13
  12. I guess somebody still goes to Blockbuster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...but it sure isn't me. They've been sued repeatedly over their late fees and my experience with them suggests that they haven't lost enough times yet.

    On the surface it looks like the new practice is a legal and accounting dodge to charge arbitrary penalties and record them as sales.

    What it does is turn over "lots and lots of copies", many at full retail. The number of copies needed in each store drops off quickly following the release and I'm sure getting rid of the copies when no longer needed is an issue. Some are sold as used but I suspect even that can be a hard sell when the competion's retail price is also coming down fast.

    By allowing the renter to keep the video an extra week or so, they greatly increase the chances of the person forgetting to return the movie or returning it even later. When this happens, they get to sell a used copy at full retail price (and you can bet they'll charge more than Zellers). Once they are selling used copies, the used price becomes the no return price. By itself, this is fine for Blockbuster--they've gotten rid of an old copy at exactly the price they want. Alternatively, they could decline to sell their overstock and instead continue to collect full retail on delinquent copies.

    I expect to see a combination of the two. Almost-new releases may feature "Keep me for just $30 [more]" promotions while absent-minded Hitchcock fans might find themselves paying $80 for "North-By-Northwest".

    Not only do they sell stale inventory, they get to do so at the highest possible price. By giving up a few $8 charges, they set themselves up for an $80 homerun.

    1. Re:I guess somebody still goes to Blockbuster... by Scotto+del+Blotto · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More like an $80 "one-timer".

      They might essentially get a free $80, but you can bet they will be losing droves of customers in the process.

      Even if the customer is in the wrong, you can bet anyone would feel robbed if they were forced to pay the full price for a rental game or film.

      When it comes to an industry which survives off of recurrent business, pissing your customers off isn't really a good strategy - even if they are in the wrong.

      - Scott

      --
      - Scott
  13. A fee by any other name... by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did you actually believe that no late fees meant you could just keep the movie forever free of charge? A femtogram of common sense would have saved you this embarassment.

    Of course nobody thought that, but at the same time, they shouldn't say something in their ads that is clearly not true. Just changing the timeframe and renaming it to "restocking fee" doesn't change that it is, in fact, a late fee.

    Bring it back more than 7 days late and they charge you a late fee, no matter WTF they call it.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  14. Explaining the policy by Repton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quote from TFA:

    The company said it was "surprised" that Harvey did not contact company officials to allow them to explain the new policy.

    The average customer doesn't get any special explaining... If they're judging an ad campaign, how can they judge it, save by looking only at the campaign?

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  15. Re:there are no more late fees... by Haeleth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You never pay a late fee. You simply own the movie.
    They say no late fees. They mean no late fees. It doesn't say anything about other fees.

    I've decided to start a new political party. We pledge that if we get power, we will ABOLISH TAXES. You heard me right - we will operate a ZERO TAX POLICY. You will never have to pay tax again for as long as we are in power.

    I take it I can count on your vote?

    (We may, from time to time, at our discretion, charge Residence Fees of up to 100% of your annual income. We believe that the advantage of living in a TAX-FREE society will more than make up for you simply being forced to give all your money to the government.)
    Get the point?
  16. People forget by jwcorder · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Most people seem to forget that if you want to keep the movies as long as you want, they have an unlimited rental plan just like Netlfix. This is only for people who sometimes keep their movies over a few days. The only people bitching are the same people who think they can keep a library book for 6 months.

    The majority of their rentals are 5 days. You get a week in addition to that. If you can't stop by the video store on your way home to drop your movies off in 12 days, they should charge you.

    Or better yet, go back to the old policy and autodraft late fees from the customers. See which policy causes people to bitch more.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
  17. We'll call it the TANSTAAFL Law by dmorin · · Score: 1, Insightful
    So apparently they're watching out for the people out there stupid enough to say "Hey, I can go get me 100 videos and never pay! That's a GREAT deal!"

    There Aint No Such Thing As A Free Lunch, people. You may not have read your Heinlein, but you should still understand the concept.

    If you're trying to protect people from misleading advertising, then good lord, get in line, Blockbuster is hardly the first to engage in THAT. Their competitor Netflix is saying the same thing - "Keep them as long as you want! No late fees!" Except I'm paying $17.99 a month and can't get any new movies until I return the old ones, so ergo the late fee is $17.99/month. Duh.

  18. Bunch of whiners! by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My god, i've never heard a sorry bunch of whiners complain so much before over something like this. I go to blockbuster a fair bit, mostly for the kids and I love this program. With a very busy schedule its very easy to be late a day or two if you have the movie for a week. The late fees add up really quickly.

    Maybe they didn't do a great job of explaining the program for customers but blame is a 2 way street here. All their signs refer to the phamplets available at each cash (and throughout the store) which explains the program in detail.

    The way it is now, you have around 37 days extra to keep a movie and return it for the same cost as 1 day late fee before the program. I swear to god some people here can complain about anything.

    One person above was paying their monthly fee to netflix and kept one of the movies for 3 months. You could have bought the damn movie but you'll complain about blockbuster?

    Yikes...

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Bunch of whiners! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First, did you read the links above?! Blockbuster says, without an OUNCE of ambiguity, that "there are no more late fees." It has a link to "find out more" and that link is DEAD!

      Here's a scenario, what if the pamphlets and the dead links said you had to turn over your first born child?! Would that be fair too?

      The fact is that Blockbuster COULD have put the fact that you've bought them after a week on their signs AND on their website. How difficult is it to say, "There are no more late fees, after a week, you've bought it!" The ONLY reason that did not do something so incredibly simple is because they want to deceive their customers!

      The fact that Blockbuster did NOT say that means they were committing fraud by omission.

      I agree that consumers have to take some responsibility, but when a company says "no more late fees" but then charges you 20 bucks automatically after a week, they are screwing customers over!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  19. Are People Just Lazy/Stupid? by Clanner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it's me, but WTF is so hard about returning a rented movie on time? Granted, I haven't rented anything since laserdics were popular, but I *never* had a problem returning a movie within three days. As for DVD's, I just buy the ones I want. Between the DVD club, buying used DVD's, and just finding good deals, I'm averaging right around $10 a DVD, and I get to watch it as many damn times as I want. And yes, I have watched most of my DVD's more than once.

    Are people really so stupid to think that by saying "No more Late Fees", that they can keep rentals forever without penalty?

    If you can't be responsible enough to return a rental product on time, maybe you shouldn't be renting them in the first place...

    --
    The dry fish swims alone.
  20. Re:Gasp! by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, please stop questioning our Benevolent Corporate Overlords. Don't you realize that Welfare Mothers are driving Cadillacs?

  21. The only thing that really changed... by dotgod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that Blockbuster extended the due date by a week and changed the late fee to $1.25.

  22. The End of Late Fees. The Start of More. - Catch by Absentminded-Artist · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the last part of Blockbuster's ad campaign. My friends and I couldn't be the only ones who sat back, read "The End of Late Fees. The Start of More.", and then said, "The start of more WHAT?"

    It's obvious that this is a shakedown. We had a late video, but my wife believed the ad campaign. "They don't charge late fees anymore," she'd tell me. Then I received a bill from Blockbuster for the two videos I rented. One had been returned because I didn't believe Blockbuster. One was still in it's 7 day grace period. I called the store and spoke with a manager. He assured me it was just a reminder. I had to inform him that the "reminder" claimed I had decided to keep the videos and that I would be charged for them. I could get a refund if I returned them within 30 days but be charged a $1.25 restocking fee. The odd thing was that my account hadn't been charged yet, and he could clearly see that one of the DVDs was not due yet. If I was a pushover consumer, I would have assumed that I had already been charged, blamed myself for being stupid, and left it at that, not called to check on my account.

    This is criminal. They obviously plan on people forgetting about the rentals, then scare them into believing they've already blown it so they get charged fullprice for the discs. I'm glad somebody's suing them. Not only was this the most stupidly worded commercial campaign but it was the most deceptive one I have seen in a long time.

    --
    The Splintered Mind - Overcoming
  23. Re:Hopefully CREDIT CARDS are on the chopping bloc by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Better yet, is to use Credit Cards AGAINST bad businesses like Blockbuster.

    Talking in a stern manner, whilst using strong terms as : Unauthorized, Theft, Illegal, and other power words and start some serious proceddings against BB.

    When this shit starts hurting BB's mail line, awwwwww ;)

    --
  24. Re:Hopefully CREDIT CARDS are on the chopping bloc by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A lot of credit cards are doing this now. They regularly check your payment history on your credit report. If they see anything, they'll raise the rates.

    In addition, they are getting much more strict with late fees. I had one credit card due on the 13th of every month. I get paid on the 14th. So I would send my payment to get there on the 14th. They never cared before. Now, they charge $39 every month if even a day late. I've been forced to go to automatic payments from my bank, with payments sent well in advance, to stop being affected.