Slashdot Mirror


Blockbuster Sued Over Late Fees Claim

DesiVideoGamer writes "CNN has a story about Blockbuster's violation of New Jersey's consumer fraud act in which they made false claims in their "No More Late Fees" campaign. New Jersey Attorney General Peter Harvey filed a lawsuit today in hopes that Blockbuster would stop misleading their customers into thinking they could keep their movie rentals as long as they want without penalty."

10 of 650 comments (clear)

  1. Price Point by Klar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These services seem like good deals on the outside, but when you really look at the prices they charge, better deals can be found elsewhere. I'd like to see a decline in the high priced rental stores like Blockbuster, and a move to lower priced store with good selection. In my town, there are several small convenience stores that do very good business renting DVD's for cheap prices($2 Canadian after tax compared to the $6ish the Blockbuster charges). One store in particular always has many copies of all the new movies, plus tons of older ones. Plus, having the movies at a convenience store gives the added benefit of a large variety of snack foods to fill up on.

    1. Re:Price Point by siliconjunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I stopped going to Blockbuster and Rogers Video after I found out that they perform their own censoring and scene-removal on films.

      Blockbuster does not actually censor the films themselves, but they are a powerful player and have exerted their influence in order to get directors to release "R" version of certain films rather than the "NC-17" unedited cut.

      However, I think you are wrong about Rogers. The Rogers Video on Lonsdale in North Vancouver has an adult video room with full fledged porn, so I'm fairly certain they are not cutting scenes from "Boogie Nights"

    2. Re:Price Point by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not true. Just proclaiming that don't doesn't make it so.

      You do realize the irony in your statement, right? I spent 10 minutes in google and google grou[s looking for supporting evidence of your claim about "Black Sheep" and not find a single mention of it.

      Did you compare the video of the Black Sheep you rented from Blockbuster with one from another source? Changes between the theaterical release to the official home video release happen all the time. For example, see Terminator 3 -- the widescreen DVD is missing boobies that were shown in the theater and are, oddly enough, on the fullscreen version (and it ain't open matte). But it doesn't matter if you got your DVD of T3 from BBV or Amazon, they are all the same content.

      So far lots of hearsay, but zero supporting evidence for the "censorship happens" side. This is an old urban legend that most likely is the result of confusing Wal-Mart's getting specially edited versions of music CDs and using guilt by association to apply the same reasoning to BBV's DVDs (BTW, while Wally World may still do this with the occasionally ultra-popular but 'offensive' CD, they have never done it with DVDs.)

      As I've purchased over 500 used DVDs from Blockbuster since 2000 I have just a little more knowledge of this topic than most.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Price Point by screwballicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For that matter, as far as movies go, call me crazy, but what ever happened to the public library? At present, if I want to watch any of hundreds of major titles, aside from Blockbuster and the rental chains, I have the option of taking it out from [i]either[/i] the downtown Toronto Public Library or the University of Toronto's A/V centre. How available a wide array of DVDs are through public channels will depend on where you are, no doubt, but here they're readily available.

  2. Why do we need a lawsuit? by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean if people today are so dumb that they think Blockbuster's commercials meant they could just keep rental movies forever then we have reached a new level of stupidity not equaled in quite a while.

  3. Re:Well, it is worse-- by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is the damn ads say NO LATE FEES...

  4. The Blockbuster Plan from the horse's mouth! by MadWicKdWire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was at Blockbuster recently, the customer in front of me asked about the "the end of late fees". This is exactly what the employee told the customer, word for word...

    "This lets you keep the rental for a couple of days extra, just to allow you extra time."

    That was pretty much about it, nothing about the restocking fee, which was just appeared on their price list one day. Nothing about after 30 days, we charge your credit card on file for the rental value of the rental.

    The reason for the lawsuit is simple... they changed the way they do their rentals, because they suspect that you could accidentally forget aobut the rental and then keep it too long, but then since they will debit your credit card, by the time you find out, it's too late.

    Now, here is the problem, you were NEVER told about the restocking fee or the 30 days late we charge you. That is down right wrong. They should tell you EXACTLY what will happen. Even in the commerical, there are no little words at the bottom of the screen or some crazy fast talking guy.

    It's riding VERY close on false advertising, but it is the end of late fees... they just have restocking fees and purchase charges!

    THANK [Fill in god of your choice] FOR NETFLIX!!!

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)... oops
  5. it's not stupidity by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those that say "to think you'd never have to return it", its not stupidity. Blockbuster specifically advertises on tv in prime time commercial slots NO LATE FEES, with no extra wording such as "Other details apply" or the ever lasting Read the Fine Print.

    Now with that in mind, if I actually used Blockbuster I would go in, and rent a new release movie for whatever X amount they charge. Now within common sense Blockbusters "NO LATE FEES" policy they have advertised, they CAN institute a policy that say within 30 days you must return the video, but within those 30 days you WILL NOT be charged late fees. And they could throw in some clause such as if the video is not returned, your account is forfiet. No late fees doesn't mean "keep forever" but it means that if you forget or just don't give a fuck like most common people when they rent a movie, you won't be penalized for it.

    Is that ok? No, of course not. People shouldn't automatically assume you can keep it forever after "Renting" it for $5. HOWEVER, Blockbuster is in the wrong here. They blatantly advertised NO LATE FEES. In their ads, they never mention you must sign up for some special monthy deal or pay a monthly fee, they just say NO LATE FEES. A nickel and dime lawyer could win this case of Faulty Advertisment in court quicker than OJ was aquited.

    --
    Aw Frell this
  6. Re:A rant... by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're up to some fiddling, play DVD's on your PC with mplayer, or get a mythTV box going and (using it's internal DVD player/ripper module) jump straight to the movie, without the ads.

    Then, just for **extra spite value**, rip and compress it to your hard drive, so that every time you play it you can say, "Yeah! Take that Blockbuster, you FUCKERS!"

    That's what I do... and frankly, it feels good every time I do it.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  7. Re:Bunch of whiners! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, did you read the links above?! Blockbuster says, without an OUNCE of ambiguity, that "there are no more late fees." It has a link to "find out more" and that link is DEAD!

    Here's a scenario, what if the pamphlets and the dead links said you had to turn over your first born child?! Would that be fair too?

    The fact is that Blockbuster COULD have put the fact that you've bought them after a week on their signs AND on their website. How difficult is it to say, "There are no more late fees, after a week, you've bought it!" The ONLY reason that did not do something so incredibly simple is because they want to deceive their customers!

    The fact that Blockbuster did NOT say that means they were committing fraud by omission.

    I agree that consumers have to take some responsibility, but when a company says "no more late fees" but then charges you 20 bucks automatically after a week, they are screwing customers over!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.