Imagining the Internet
oDDmON oUT writes ""Imagining the Internet", an ambitious project patterned after the book "Forecasting the Telephone: A Retrospective Technology Assessment" by Ithiel de Sola Pool, examines the potential future of what some deem the most revolutionary technological innovation of the 20th century, while providing a peek into it's history.
Nearly 1,300 technology pioneers participated by responding to a survey posing questions about the effects of the internet on a wide range of topics, as well as giving their comments and impressions. Those predictions are indexed into a searchable database, and there is a report available as a pdf file."
I use Norton Ghost.
You have to wade through a lot of crap (PDF) to get to the good stuff (the contents).
The PDF in HTML form, courtesy Google's file converter
Headline is botched
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
01001000100101001010010100100010100010100101010101 01010010101010201010100000011110010101001010101010 1010101010101010101...
http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/21/
The Doormat
If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
Which innovation is that?
Ithiel de Sola Pool's Profile .pdf file
Forecasting the Telephone: A Retrospective Technology Assessment of the Telephone
The Predictions Database
The
Its kind of sad but if buisness dosnt stop trying to take over the internet it will be dead I think. With all the adware ect. on line I know a lot of people that don't even use it anymore.
I'm much more interested in "imaging" the Net, some current traffic/protocol/fiber maps, than in yet another bunch of pundits' breathless spin on how the Internet "will change everything!". The maps will help change things, and the yakking is more of the same.
--
make install -not war
It refers to this.
Well WWW anyway http://www.steveb.atomhosting.info/2004/12/maps.ph p
What the lede of this story doesn't tell us is that this "Imagining the Internet" project is merely rehashing predictions of the Internet from the 1990s, not what today's thinkers imagine what the Internet will be in the future.
Yet asshats everywhere still can't tell the difference between ITS and IT'S.
I already got an image of the internet! Here!
How did this story get approved?!?
Allready happens, its called the The Way Back Machine
Candle burns its brightest in the dark
You silly! Of course Al Gore imaged the internet! Every inventor always makes a backup.
My digital rights don't need management.
..I imagine the Internets of being a place where politicians can invent parts of it, or the entire Intneret's invention alone can be credited to a single person or executive administration. That's my image of how I imagine the Internets.
The experts rank change to neighborhoods and communities as almost least likely to change (second only to same-users-manual-for-centuries religion). How many slashdotters are going to agree with that? If you include the change in the definition of a community, that category should high on the list.
William Gibson already thought of that idea long ago, in his Sprawl trilogy. I believe it was in Mona Lisa Overdrive, that one of the characters spends all of his time locked up in an abandoned building, trying to find the "shape" of the matrix (aka internet).
...while providing a peek into it's history.
o/~ Oooooooooh... if you want it to be possessive, it's just I T S, but if you want it to be a contraction, it's I T apostrophe S... scallawag! o/~
<Homestar>Seriously</Homestar>. If SlashDot wants to get taken seriously outside the geek community, shouldn't they employ editors who can, well, edit?
With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
I assume you're trying to be smarmy or something, but while the internet (or the world wide web) isn't the most important creation of the 20th century, obviously, it is arguably the most revolutionary. Transportation? OK, now we can get places quicker, encouraging growth outwards instead of concentrating in cities. Quite revolutionary. Better medicine? OK, people die less, or at least they cease dying of certain causes and instead die of different ones. Important, but not exactly revolutionary. Television? Mostly just for entertainment... even the news is for entertainment. Newspapers remain the best source of news, excluding the internet. Not revolutionary.
~CGameProgrammer( );
The fact that the results are in a PDF file is somewhat ominous, given that this is a group dedicated to the purpose of predicting the future of the Internet.
So, instead of posting their results in a form that is easily browsed, cross-linked, and generally made a part of the Internet, they use a format which has as its primary claim to fame the ability to be printed out.
Perhaps I am just grouchy because I am still working on my morning coffee, but it would seem to me the future of the Internet looks like a lot of proprietary file formats locked up behind walls of DRM.
www.eFax.com are spammers