Slashdot Mirror


Is Google AutoLink Patent-Pending By Microsoft?

theodp writes "While Google pooh-poohed any comparison of its controversial AutoLink feature to Microsoft's SmartTag technology, Google's generation of dynamic links to maps and use of ISBN numbers to trigger links to booksellers cover the same territory as Microsoft's 2000 patent application for Providing electronic commerce actions based on semantically labeled strings, whose sole inventor - Jeff Reynar - was the lead SmartTag Program Manager while at MS and is reportedly now a Google Product Manager who's being credited as AutoLink's creator. Reynar's patent applications that have been assigned to Microsoft, including one for Smart Links and Tags, describe a world of 'recognizer' plug-ins that automatically look at every document a user creates, receives or views, transmitting messages to 'action' plug-ins - and even to the plug-ins' authors - that can be used to decide what info you'll be presented with, what options you'll be given, what price you'll pay for goods, and even who you'll be permitted to buy from."

11 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. wonder how many... by mpower1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    wonder how many google posts we can get in a year...

  2. I can't quite put my finger on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, when I see this, I have this feeling of overlords or something.

    Wierd.

  3. Re:I am Jack's total lack of surprise by Taladar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you mean "We better learn how to get rid of it"?

  4. Slashdot Primer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google good.
    Microsoft bad.

    1. Re:Slashdot Primer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Google good.

      You got one 'o' too many in there.

  5. Re:Seems Jeff Reynar would know by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Funny

    unless...
    (anti-MS paranoid mode ON)

    1) get ex employee into a competing company (as a "mole")
    2) the employee, as previously instructed, comes up with an idea the ex-employer has already patented
    3) wait until idea is deployed
    4) sue
    5) (no ???)
    6) profit!!!

    BTW I don't like smart tags, Google's or anyone else's.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  6. Answer by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes.

    I love it when Slashdot uses headlines that can be answered in a single word. Makes commenting so much easier.

  7. Re:Your Rights Online? by j0nkatz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear:
    [X] Clueless n00b
    [X] Lamer
    [_] Flamer
    [_] Pervert
    [_] Sexist
    [X] Spammer
    [_] Racist
    [X] Dumbass
    [X] Waste of Life
    [X] Other: Pathetic Moron

    You are being flamed because:
    [X] You obviously don't know anything about the topic at hand.
    [X] You started a pointless thread.
    [_] You bumped a pointless thread.
    [X] Your post contained nothing but crap.
    [_] You can't spell more than 3 words right.
    [X] Your awful markup made the post unreadable.
    [_] You made a useless assumption.
    [_] You posted IN ALL CAPS FOR NO APPARENT REASON.
    [_] You tYpEd SoMeThInG lAmE lIkE tHiS.
    [_] You don't know how to use the search feature
    [X] You say you're "1337".
    [_] You posted a topic that's been posted 50 times already.

    As punishment, you must:
    [X] Refrain from posting until you have a vague idea of what you're doing.
    [X] Stab yourself in the eye with a pen.
    [_] Give up your internet account.
    [X] Eat paint chips for the next 6 months.
    [X] Make goat.cx your home page.
    [_] Jump into a bathtub with a toaster.
    [X] Fuck yourself in the ass with a cactus
    [X] Attach a car battery to your scrotum

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
  8. Re:Derivative Work by nametaken · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think that would land heavily on the user. AutoLink (as I understand it) is an optional function of the toolbar that must be explicitly enabled by the user.

    As for copyright violations, I seriously doubt it. That would be like filing suit against me for making a mandatory minimum text size in my browser. Or perhaps even like me looking at a book through sunglasses. I haven't changed the content and republished it, I've just modified the way I see the original work.

    An interesting idea though.

  9. Re:Your Rights Online? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "For the love of michael, just make a legal section. This is not about our rights. Not yours, not mine, just Google's. Sheesh."

    And another thing, it really pisses me off that the show was called 'Deep Space Nine' when they went an entire season where they weren't on the station and it was called Terak Nor. For the love of michael, they should have called it Star Trek: Terak Nor for that season!! Of course, after every episode, I was on the internet registerring my complaint throughout the world!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  10. I control the vertical a-holes! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
    The technology dredges up a long-simmering legal debate over who owns the desktop. Does the consumer have the right to install software that can manipulate the appearance or delivery of Web pages? Or does the Web publisher have the ultimate say and control over how its content is displayed?
    Guess what? I went to the news.com.com page and clicked View/Page Source and read it that way. (Gods, it's ugly HTML!) Then for an encore, I browsed the page with my Clippy-tech voice reader. (The little character will do various animation routines when it hits keywords. Wheee!) It's still reading the feedback comments.

    Better come lock me up! I know how things work and how to program; I'm a dangerous fellow!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.