Slashdot Mirror


Always-On Internet For Cheapskates?

chuck writes "I like my broadband Internet access because of its always-on nature, but my usage doesn't really justify paying $40-$50 each month for hundreds of kb/s when all I really do is read and write email sporadically, light web browsing and IM. Are there any options for cheapskates like me to pay less for lower bandwidth (modem speeds would be fine) but still have an always-on connection for cheaper than cable or DSL? I have a $5/mo ISP that I use when I'm out and about, and my 2.5G wireless phone can give me internet access on a shoestring (with free evenings and weekends) but neither of those has that always-on quality. Any ideas?"

81 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. The cheapest solution... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Piggyback on your neighbor's unsecured WAP. :-)

    1. Re:The cheapest solution... by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, not such a bad idea. Here in New York I've set up Wi-Fi enabled laptops for friends and just had them piggy back on an open network... Just about anywhere you go in New York you can pick up at least a couple open networks (I once saw 20 at once). A friend of mine actually put a Wi-Fi card in his desktop and canceled his cable modem, and now he just piggy-backs off someone in his building.

      Better yet, move to someplace like Philly that is going to have free Wi-FI city wide soon.

    2. Re:The cheapest solution... by zarozarozaro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or better yet, work out something where you split the cost/month, and piggyback with some security.

    3. Re:The cheapest solution... by fm6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That answers the requirement for low cost and instant-on. But not the requirement for low speed...

    4. Re:The cheapest solution... by germanStefan · · Score: 2

      I strung a cable between my house and my neighbors house. He paid half of the bill. If you do that with one or two neighbors, its not really that unethical (all though it is illegal), but I don't see the huge problem with sharing it with one or two people. Most people don't need all the bandwidth they get with cable so distributing makes sense. If you want to be legal, purchase the Pro package from the cable company, then you can share it with as many people as your want...

    5. Re:The cheapest solution... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno if it's illegal exactly ... ISPs aren't part of law enforcement (yet.) But I'm sure it's against the TOS of most providers.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:The cheapest solution... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just use Internet Explorer on top of it. That should make it the hat trick!

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    7. Re:The cheapest solution... by jc42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      See if speakeasy has service in your area. They encourage sharing of connections, especially with wifi. They will help you set up line sharing with neighbors (or tell you if you have a neighbor that's already doing this). They'll help you set it up and take care of the billing for you. Depending on the actual speed you need, you could share one DSL line among N people, and each would pay 1/N of the monthly bill. It would all be open and legal.

      They also don't block any ports, so you could run an email server on your own machine if you like. For that matter, you could run your own web server, making it easy to share your pictures with friends. I've done a lot of this, just sending a URL so they can browse the thumbnails and download any pics they like.

      Are there other ISPs that encourage this? You'd think they all would, if they were actually interested in giving good service to their customers.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    8. Re:The cheapest solution... by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I once saw 20 [networks] at once [in New York]

      My record for a single sitting on the 38th floor of the Hilton in midtown is **247** networks. Not all open, sure, but still... ;)

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    9. Re:The cheapest solution... by Grax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (IANAL)
      I would presume it is prosecutable under the same laws they would use against cable signal theft.

      Under those laws they only need to show that you are wired up in such a way to enable "signal theft" and then it is up to you to prove that you were not "stealing" their signal.

    10. Re:The cheapest solution... by PKPerson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My uncle anc cousins have an interesting setup. They pay their neighbors about $10 a month and their neighbors supply them with a wireless key. They bought a kick-ass directional antenna and pointed it at their neighbor's house. Its not technically piggybacking, buy I dont know what the IPS's polocy is on sharing internet.

    11. Re:The cheapest solution... by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe the name for this service is "IP freely"

    12. Re:The cheapest solution... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative
      If I can legally do that in my own home (and I guess it would be pretty weird if I couldn't), what's stopping me from sharing the same line with one or two neighbours if I would be living alone (instead of with others) ?

      In the US, residential service is supposed to be for one residence. A lot of people do it (I did the same 25 years ago with cable TV, and am about to do it with my current connection), but that doesn't mean the provider has to like it or authorize it. Who does the neighbor call for a service issue? You, or the cable company?

      From the TimeWarner RoadRunner service Acceptable Use Policy:
      "...the RoadRunner service is provided to you for personal, non-commercial use only."

      From the TimeWarner RoadRunner Cable Modem Service Subscription Agreement
      "5. Subscriber Conduct.(d)
      Subscriber will not resell the Road Runner Service, or any portion thereof, or otherwise charge others to use the Road Runner Service, or any portion thereof. Further, Subscriber will not redistribute the Road Runner Service, or any portion thereof, whether or not Subscriber receives compensation for such redistribution. The Road Runner Service as offered under this Agreement is a residential service offered for personal, non-commercial use only."

      Each house/apt/condo is supposed to pay for their own connection.

    13. Re:The cheapest solution... by SpookyFish · · Score: 2


      I have cable and am fine with paying for it, but I did this for the first few weeks after I moved into this condo, before comcast got around to activating my taps.

      There were 8 unsecured points with reasonble signal strength.. it's made me wonder how much effort it would be to bond several wap connections together for higher bandwidth, especially considering how cheap the hardware has become.

      Would be an interesting model for apartment / condo communities - since not everyone will be using the net at the same time, join in and add your bandwidth to the 'community pool' - most of the time everyone would get better speeds.

    14. Re:The cheapest solution... by bigman2003 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I work on a fairly large campus, with wireless access in a lot of places.

      When I am there, I turn on my Pocket PC just to see who is accessing the network at the time.

      It usually looks like this:

      Jenny Chu
      M. Choi
      Lynn Park
      Yokomoto Comp
      Sun Yee
      MaXHaXoR
      Martin Wong

      Gee...I wonder who that nerdy looking white guy over in the corner is...

      --
      No reason to lie.
    15. Re:The cheapest solution... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depending on how good your card is and how far away you are you usually pick up far more networks than you can connect to - the AP's signal is strong enough to pick up but the card isn't always transmitting at high enough power for the signal to get back to the AP.

    16. Re:The cheapest solution... by tylernt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why you purchase a business grade account that does not have the AUP restricitons of the residential account. If necessary, form a corporation (takes two people, $50, and a trip to City Hall) and have your neighbors become members of your corp. You're no longer sharing internet access with a third party because you're all in the same corporation, thus, no AUP violation.

      This is assuming you purchase the internet account in the name of the corp, not your own name, of course.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    17. Re:The cheapest solution... by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno if it's illegal exactly ... ISPs aren't part of law enforcement (yet.) But I'm sure it's against the TOS of most providers.

      That is a good question whether it would fall in the same catagory as theft of service. If we're talking cableTV, and you run a cable from your house to another it would be considered theft of service.

      Key difference with WiFi is you are not actually running a physical wire, and WiFi is often offered directly from the ISP. Having one in it self isn't illegal like running a rogue wire. You can't see it, or photograph it. I have yet to see a case where someone gets taken to court over sharing beyond their property.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    18. Re:The cheapest solution... by izomiac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At my old high school we probably had 50 people sharing their music collections (it was a boarding school). I hardly ever needed to open Napster (this was ~5 years ago), because someone had already downloaded whatever I was interested in. Of course, some people put passwords on their shared folders, but it wasn't anything pqwak couldn't take care of.

    19. Re:The cheapest solution... by WeblionX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pringles can?

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    20. Re:The cheapest solution... by Dausha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ". . . its (sic) not really that unethical (although it is illegal) . . ."

      Yes, it is quite illegal. Most states call it the "Theft of Cable" act, or more recently, "Theft of Information Services." In my state, it's a felony that can get you up to five years on the first offense.

      But, more importantly, you are saying that theft is "not that unethical." Or, to put it another way, "theft is ethical." Okay, so when somebody steals your car you won't press charges because it's ethical?

      What's that? Not the same thing? I disagree. First of all, both cases of theft are statutorially illegal. Second, you paid for your car (probably still are like most of us), so you should get to decide who uses it. The Cable Companies paid for the infrastructure. Don't they have the right to determine who can use it?

      Or, another example? Rental cars. A big company loans you their car. They paid for the car, you can only use it within the limitations of the contract you sign as a renter.

      So, while it may seem cheaper to steal cable . . .

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    21. Re:The cheapest solution... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They also don't block any ports, so you could run an email server on your own machine if you like.

      Does speakeasy give a static ip or lease them out via dhcp?

      A *lot* of mail servers reject mail sent from dynamic hosts.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    22. Re:The cheapest solution... by compjinx · · Score: 5, Funny

      They invented a new technology to combat clogged up wi-fi networks; they are called CAT5 cables. You can plug them between your cable modem and your computer and have up to 1Gbps all to yourself!

      --
      I will not lower myself to using a lame-joke sig... dangit!
    23. Re:The cheapest solution... by eric76 · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is a good question whether it would fall in the same catagory as theft of service.

      Not in Texas. Or, to be more accurate, after reviewing the law on theft of service, it is very unlikely that it could be classified as that.

      From the Texas Penal Code:

      31.04. THEFT OF SERVICE.

      (a) A person commits theft of service if, with intent to avoid payment for service that he knows is provided only for compensation:

      (1) he intentionally or knowingly secures performance of the service by deception, threat, or false token;

      (2) having control over the disposition of services of another to which he is not entitled, he intentionally or knowingly diverts the other's services to his own benefit or to the benefit of another not entitled to them;

      (3) having control of personal property under a written rental agreement, he holds the property beyond the expiration of the rental period without the effective consent of the owner of the property, thereby depriving the owner of the property of its use in further rentals; or

      (4) he intentionally or knowingly secures the performance of the service by agreeing to provide compensation and, after the service is rendered, fails to make payment after receiving notice demanding payment.

      First of all, (3) and (4) wouldn't normally apply. However, if you agreed to pay the neighbor half the bill and then didn't, you could be found guilty for that. But that would be theft of service from the neighbor, not his ISP.

      If you broke your neighbor's wep and then used his network you would have committed theft of service. Similary, you would also be guilty of theft of service if you reconfigured his access point to enable yourself to connect as well.

      But I can't see that it would be theft of service if your neighbor gave you permission to connect to the internet through his access point.

      I'm not a lawyer, so my interpreation could be wrong. And, of course, other states may differ.

    24. Re:The cheapest solution... by dev!null!4d · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      ~www.devnull.co.uk
    25. Re:The cheapest solution... by danheskett · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, speakeasy gives static ips by request, and they'll even set your reverse dns name however you want.

    26. Re:The cheapest solution... by danheskett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sign up for a regular package you want, and call up and ask for a static ip address and a reverse address.

      Most of the black lists out there that block spam based on "dynamic" ranges do so based on what IPs are allocated to dial-up ISPs and home style cable modems. I've not had any problems with speakeasy's being accounts of any type being blacklisted. Your mileage may vary. Even if you don't get a static IP from speakeasy, the lease times are very much staticish. I dont have speakeasy no more, but I had the same IP from them for like 18 months - even though it was "dynamic".

  2. Stealing WIFI maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or atleast co-oping with some neighbors to save money.

  3. motionsensor + autoconnect by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    feel like you're always on by having your computer connect as you enter the room ;)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did exactly this with Misterhouse and diald. I configured the reaction to the staircase motion sensor to be a ping to an off-network IP. Previously, I just configured diald to be "always connected" to my office VPN (an 800#). It took months before they nagged me about it, so then I moved to the motion sensor approach. It definitely stopped the nagging.

      As an aside, you may be able to get free (or cheap) AOL/Yahoo!/MSN IM on your cellphone. I get all three unlimited for free on my Nextel. I only use the AOL piece and created a separate id just for the phone. ("g33kb0y" and "g33kb0ycell" for example)

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    3. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny
      Right now Im wrestling with verizon to get me broadband. My neigbor has it and he lives on the same DRIVEWAY!!!!

      Don't get too upset; most ISPs won't even consider providing broadband service to the homeless.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny
      ("g33kb0y" and "g33kb0ycell" for example)

      You misspelled "c311".

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  4. Not many options by yotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make sure everybody calls your cell and use your land line for internet. I did that for about two years before DSL was available in my area.

  5. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Bri3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except that a 2nd phone line+dialup costs the same as broadband, so you might as well get the broadband.

  6. A practical solution by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    my usage doesn't really justify paying $40-$50 each month for hundreds of kb/s

    Cancel your cable TV subscription and get BitTorrent. Your broadband cost will suddenly be justified.

    1. Re:A practical solution by Ian+Action · · Score: 5, Funny
      yeah but where are some good places to get torrent downloads these days, suprnova and lokitorrent are the shutdownohnoes

      Hey, no problem! Check out...

      Wait a minute... You don't work for the MPAA do you?

      --
      Why am I not rapping? I am rapping with you in a way.
    2. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      torrentreactor.net
      btefnet.net
      baka-updates.com
      boxtorrents.com
      bi-torrent.com
      shuntv.net
      mysp leen.net

    3. Re:A practical solution by comwiz56 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://isohunt.com/ has a torrent search... very good results, pretty much the only thing i use now that suprnova's gone.

  7. always on? by MotherErich · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've never had my DSL/Cable connection go out on . . .

    --
    You have to be smarter than the machine you're working with.
  8. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Osty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get dial up then have a dedicated 2nd phone line just for it, and leave it connected 24/7. I did this in college and never had a problem. There are lots of free programs out there to do stuff like keep your connection alive, redail on dissconnect, etc.

    Unfortunately, most "unlimited" dial-up plans are actually hour-limited. If you read the TOU carefully, they'll tell you what "unlimited" means, but it's typically a high (but not impossible) number of hours per month. If you pass that limit, you'll either get blocked for the rest of the month, or charged a very large amount, depending on the ISP. Not every ISP will catch you, and those that do won't catch you every time, but if you keep a dial-up connection up 24/7 for months on end, any ISP you use will notice sooner or later and take some action.

    The best thing to do is ask when you sign up for the ISP. They may have a more expensive dial-up plan that allows you to stay up 24/7/365. It might cost you $30/mo rather than $10/mo, but that's still cheaper than $50/mo broadband.

  9. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by thebes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But then you're sucking up the cost of the phone line PLUS the dial up account. That would cost at least as much as cheap DSL.

  10. Check with your cable/DSL company by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Informative

    some of them have slower connections that you can get for less money(though they don't like to advertise them). For example, the cable at home I can get for $25, or you can get a faster connection for about $40, of course YMMV

  11. DSL Lite by Talisman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BellSouth offers DSL Lite; a 256/128 dsl circuit for $24.95 per month. Perhaps your local DSL provider offers something similar.

    Or, download NetStumbler and sniff out an open WAP in your neighborhood and leech bandwidth. There are about 5 I can reach from my house.

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
  12. Piggybacking works, and it isn't always stealing by matyas47 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Find a neighbor who's got wireless and offer to pay half the cost. My landlord got wireless a few months ago. I was still on dialup at home at the time, but I had wireless in my laptop for hitting the hotspots. He told me to go ahead and use his connection, since he's paying for it anyway. (I did offer to cover half of the cost, but he simply repeated that he's paying for it anyway, so he didn't care.)

  13. ISDN? by Bri3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could try a single ISDN(56k), though it might be more expensive than broadband anyway.

    1. Re:ISDN? by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Assuming you can find an ISP who'll charge you what ISDN is really worth these days (rather than pricing data access over a single 64k channel as if it were "broadband"), it's not a bad option. As I recall from the days when I was running my web server over an ISDN line, the line itself isn't horribly more expensive than POTS. Even if you don't get "always on" service from your ISP, it's darn close to "instant on" (at least compared to V.whatever handshaking over POTS). Plus you get a second phone line out of it (e.g. for a fax machine, second answering machine).

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  14. Dial-Up/Linux by Zebra_X · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your only other option is a dial up connection. If you want it to be dedicated however, you'll need a dedicated phone line. That will run ~ $16 - $25 Dollars US add in $5 mo. for your dial-up provider. Worst case you are at $30 best case $21.

    The trick is to use a dial on demand linux box. You can have a script that will automatically dial into your provider. When you get kicked, it calls back. Couple this with an ethernet card and you'll have a gateway, and even a hardware firewall to protect you from all the evils that would have their way with your box. You can also use this machine for common services such as a caching DNS server which will speed up page load times over dial-up and as a mail gateway which also speed up perceived mail send times.

  15. Re:Let`s change ;) by puiahappy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am From Romania :( and we have 2 choises dial-up at 16.4kb/s at 8 euro/month or cable at 256kb/s 2Gb(9$), 4Gb(15$), 8Gb(20$), 16Gb(29$). And of course fiber (2Mb/s) at more than 1000$/month

    --
    Think like a hacker, act like a hacker, but never become a hacker !
  16. Re:In a nutshell by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Informative
  17. ISDN by strredwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ask ISP's around if they still do ISDN. Granted, it's 128K, but since most everyone's broadband, the price should be cheap now. Plus, you don't need to light both B channels all the time. Keeping the D channel lighted at 9600 bps for small stuff will keep you online all the time anyway for monitoring (like POP or long, slow downloads), and for harder stuff (regular downloads, surfing, etc) you can light the B's up.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  18. Some creativity by Piquan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, let's consider alternatives to always-on.

    Autodial gets you a good portion of the way there. A good autodialer should take only a couple of seconds, in other words, not much longer than you need to focus on the screen anyway.

    A cronjob can fetch your email periodically, so you can glance at your screen and see that you have mail. And you don't care if there's a few seconds delay on your outbound mail; let your MTA deal with that.

    As for webbrowsing... hmmmm, that's a bit tougher.... Okay, here's one. Put in a proxy. If the net connection is up, then it just works transparently. (And by the way, Squid really does seem to speed up my web fetch times, even from the same computer!) If the connection is down, it brings it up, sure, but what to do in the meantime? Well, if you're visiting /., then it says "Nothing to see here, move along". If you're not, then it redirects to the same URL with a typo (so you'll assume you screwed up), and then displays a parking page. Okay, that sounds pretty authentic.

    IM? Piece of cake: grab an IRC server and a bunch of Eliza-bots.

    Okay, you're all set! Always-on experience, on a dialup budget!

  19. Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by IDkrysez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can anyone speak to using "Amateur Radio" equipment to do this? I think the only ongoing costs would be power -- up-front costs include equipment and licensing, but I think you could get there (modem speed always-on) for under $100 on a budget, and possibly closer to megabit for 1k USD. I also hear that a) you can get into big trouble if your unlicnsed, and b) can lose your license and/or get into bigger trouble if you abuse your licensed privileges. IIRC there are no-code packet license now, which means you don't *have* to learn morse code to pass. This also uses some already-established [public?] radio infrastructure, namely repeaters, if I've made any sense of the subject at all... IANAH (hammer). Am I way off here, folks?

    --
    Was it a bat I saw? Racecar. Stack cats. A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal--Panama!
  20. Be Happy by bmazloum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be happy with what you have. I just moved to Lebanon, waited 6 months for a "high speed" connection. That's 30KB/s downloads and 12KB/s upload for a whopping $120USD/mo. I'd take your connection and prices anyday. Funny thing is, this is $200USD/mo. cheaper than the dialup since you pay/min. here. haha...

    --
    A computer is only as smart as the person sitting infront of it.
  21. It's not just the speed with broadband by urlgrey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From having had numerous friends and family members bemoan that "I just don't use the Internet that much!" as justification for not getting DSL/cable, in 100% of the cases, they've all had worlds open up when they saw how painless things became once their access was so dramatically faster. (Waiting several seconds for a single page like Yahoo! to download gets tedious quickly.)

    Their faster access meant more Internet usage (now they're paying bills online, banking, and shopping for instance), which in turn meant they "needed" the higher speed conenction.

    Very quickly, they realize how much more than just faster speed, the faster speed meant.

    --
    Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
  22. "Modem"? by Bnonn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mo-dem speeds"? Wassat?

  23. light DSL is your solution by LullySing · · Score: 2, Informative

    light DSL is usually maximally 128Kbits down, but it's ( a very gimped, usually for people that barely qualify for ) DSL.

    they usually charge around 15-20ish dollards a month for that kind of DSL access up here in montreal, canada, and it would solve the always-on, cheaper for bling problem you're having.

    As for me, nothing will make me part from my fixed ip 3meg adsl line for 60 canadian a month.

    --
    Peace and happyness to you, by LullySing ;)
  24. Speakeasy by miyako · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speakeasy.net will allow you to sublet your DSL connection (not sure of any other providers that officially support this). You might look into just making back some of your cost by subleting out connections to a few neighbors over wireless. Offer a wireless connection and maybe a few other services and price according to how many subscribers you have (maybe divide the cost of the connection evenly?)
    I have a friend who does this, and has had some pretty good luck. Biggest thing to watch out for if you do that is to have some sort of document outlining what exactly you offer (especially that you have no uptime garuntee, and what, if any, tech support you offer, and when).

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  25. How about UUCP? by zoid.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    This isn't really the solution but it's the on we used 10 years ago to send email. Wow.. Things have really changed in the past 10 years.

  26. Try my ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    My ISP, "Linksys", is said to have nationwide presence, and best of all, their service is free! They are Wi-Fi only, however; look around, they might be servicing your neighborhood.

    This is not a plug. I'm just a happy consumer, er, I mean, customer ;-)

    1. Re:Try my ISP by thecombatwombat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Linksys is pretty great. In my area they seem to be much more reliable than "default."

    2. Re:Try my ISP by adnoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is good advice! They did a major rollout in my neighborhood on Christmas day, in fact. What dedication.

      --
      No sig
  27. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exactly. I was on "Unlimited" access with DelaNET. After being online for a bit, I started getting e-mails, something to the effect of:

    "By unlimited, we do not mean unlimited. You are using your connection without limit, which is not the meaning of unlimited. You can't possibly use your connection 24/7. What you're doing falls under the category of business connectivity, and if you keep staying online, your rates will shoot up into the hundreds of dollars per month." (from joybenz@delanet.com)

    I'm not kidding.

    I wrote a script to stop pppd at 2AM and restart it at 6AM. No more annoying emails!

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  28. Volunteer based networks by DaKritter · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am network admin in one of the larger volunteer networks in the area (Copenhagen, Denmark). We get internet for ~$8.7 a month (50 DKr). We share a 45 mbit line between 2400 apartments, of which 1400 have internet service. Commercial ISP's have about the same bandwidth for that amount of users, perhaps even less.

    The cheapest DSL is still 3 times more expensive and I frequently download stuff at 20 mbit. We also provide TV and POTS, equally cheap. Switches in the basements, copper to the apartments, fibre between switches and buildings. Been a huge work, but quite fun and worth it.

    You can get started with lot less, just share an single DSL between 10-20 apartments. Here such networks are all the rage, popping up everywhere anytime.

  29. Cox Basic -- Unadvertised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use Cox Communications Basic service for broadband over cable. They don't list it on their site but you can call and ask for it. It's $25 a month and 256Kbps downstream & something like 64Kbps upstream.

  30. Don't make the tail wag the dog by EtherMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think your going about this the wrong way. While you might not NEED the speed of high speed Internet, you admit you want the convenience of always on service.

    I would urge you to look in a different direction. Instead of dropping the HSI, (high speed Internet), I'd drop my analog telephone service and switch to a VoIP provider. Depending on the optional services and amount of long distance, you could save $40 or much more each month by using an unlimited VoIP package from Vonage, VoicePulse, AT&T, etc versus traditional telco rates. Since you also have a cellphone that apparently works at your home, there's really no downside to this scenario.

    If you are dead set about nixing your HSI, your best option is to find an agreeable, nearby neighbor to share their HSI account. But if you do this, definately use wireless -- not copper -- to connect to his/her service. Differences in ground potential between houses can destroy equipment, cause a shock or even be a fire hazard.

    You could use something like a Multitech RouteFinder RF500, or any other router that provides a serial port to use an external modem for ISP dial-up. This would give you an always-on dial-up connection. However, since a bare POTS line for your always-on Internet is around $22/mo, plus a bare-bones, unlimited dial-up ISP is another $10/mo, when you add in taxes and fees, you're maybe going to save $5 - 15 per month: not worth it in my view.

    ISDN, at least in the USA, is probably not an attractive option, since most telco's charge per minute of use per B channel, plus the ISP's usually charge a higher rate for access. Where the telco does offer unlimited data service it's at a considerably higher rate than $50/mo. So you'll pay more for slower speed via ISDN.

    I know several people who have "cut the cord" to the phone company and rely solely on VoIP over the Cable Internet and cellphone for voice calls. They save an average of $30/mo and are quite satisfied with the quality and reliability.
    --
    --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    1. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Differences in ground potential between houses can destroy equipment, cause a shock or even be a fire hazard.

      And this information might sound alarmist, but there's even more to it -- crossing a legal boundary point (i.e. a mailing address) is against the law. You can be held responsible if you run a wire from one building into another, and that line causes damage. I used to work for a dialup ISP, and we ran some cat5 from one 5 story building to another, underneath the street. We found out what we did was completely illegal, and if that building ever caught on fire, we'd be screwed big time if that line were still there.

      So wireless has more than just tech advantages :)

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  31. DSL Lite... by microTodd · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure where you live and who your baby bell is but....my DSL ISP, BellSouth, offers what they call DSL Lite, which is always on but has much lower bandwith for less cost, $24.95 a month.

    http://www.bellsouth.com/consumer/inetsrvcs/index. html

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  32. Move to Canada by ninja_sqrl · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want cheap broadband, move to Saskatchewan. I get 1.5 Mb up, 300 Kb down ADSL for $25 Canadian/month, and you can get 64 kb download speed package (extra-light) for like $12/month. You just have to deal with the shatty weather.......... Older Price List for Sasktel

    --
    Pull my dongle!
  33. Re:Vonage by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's possible/probable that Vonage doesn't have enough frequency band to support a modem.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  34. Better yet... by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Offer to secure your neighbor's wireless network for him if he'll let you piggyback, since your bandwidth needs are minimal.

    1. Re:Better yet... by magefile · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well ... I tried something like that once, and my neighbor reacted badly. I apologized once I realized that the offer sounded a bit too Mafia-esque: "hey ... nice LAN. Be a shame if it were to be hacked".

  35. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by LighthouseJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was on Mindspring before Earthlink swallowed them, I had my linux server dialed into Mindspring 24/7, when the call was dropped, pppd would autorespawn and redial out. After a while, I would receive emails saying that it's against TOS to run an FTP server etc... which I wasn't doing, I just wanted the always-on type of connection. Mindspring's setup forced the modem to redial every 24 hours, but I was never denied service or charged for fully using the connection. They'd always quote me as using 43,200 minutes or more for that month, basically the numbers said that I split my time between being connected and dialing the modem.

    However, the minutes aren't exactly accurate because if I was disconnected and redialed, their servers wouldn't update themselves that I disconnected, so for a short time, it would look like I was logged in twice simultaneously. This wasn't a problem until Earthlink screwed everything up, causing busy signals, and crap. After Earthlink came along, I got charged for simultaneous logins. I called the people and asked "wtf?" and they parroted the problem and TOS. I asked them what phone numbers were used on my account to call in and they said "they are all phone number whatever". I blew their mind and asked "How could my modem be connected to two other modems at the same time?". Either the person on the telephone understood and credited me the charge on the next bill or silence fell over the phone.

  36. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm surprised no one's linked to Paul Boutin's How To Steal Wi-Fi (and how to keep the neighbors from stealing yours)

    --
    [o]_O
  37. Use the band width you have by mysterious_mark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not get VOIP and get rid of your phone instead, you'll save enough money on phone bills to justify the broadband connection. Also host your own site if you have one, seems better to find a good use for the bandwidth you have, rther than to get rid if it altogether. M

  38. ...while in NZ... by RyatNrrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in New Zealand we have to modulate our own data transfer by beating drums down the phone line, and Telecom New Zealand still charges us a hefty surcharge for the privilege.

    Seriously, acceptable quality dial-up Internet for $US10 sounds luxurious to me, while $US25 for 256K with a limit above 3GB sounds like science fiction.

    Telecom New Zealand sucks arse.

    If you're reading this, and you work for Telecom New Zealand, SHAME ON YOU.

  39. Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 3, Interesting

    DISCLAIMER: First off, know that I am not a lawyer, nor have I ever played one on or off of TV. This comment is not legal advice or legal analysis, despite any evidence to the contrary, and any reliance you take on it is evidence of your own stupidity, and you assume the risk inherent in so doing.

    But something I've heard about from law school professors (don't ask what I was doing in a law school classroom, I'm not a lawyer, remember?) is that we have a doctrine of adverse possession and its related cousin, prescriptive easement. Adverse possession lets you take ownership of land if you've been trespassing on it for 20 years if you have used it as if you were the legitimate owner for all that time. Prescriptive easements don't require exclusivity or possession - you just have to use property for a long time and then you get to keep using it in the same way forever. Also, the statutory period is often lower for prescriptive easements, like 5 or 10 years.

    Enter the digital age. If you use your neighbor's wireless for 5 years straight, you could convince a (very gullible) court to grant you an easement that ensures your neighbor never gets rid of his wireless connection or tries to lock you out of it. And that burden would probably run with his apartment or home, so no future tenant or owner could lock you out of his wireless or cancel his Internet connection.

    Yes, the non-lawyer in me definitely thinks this is a good idea.

    1. Re:Legal Analysis by angle_slam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Prescriptive easements only apply to real property.

    2. Re:Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Don't take the moderators' inability to recognize a joke as any failure to understand the law on my part. I thought the parenthetical about not asking me what I was doing in a law school classroom would convince people I wasn't serious, but I guess I was wrong. Why is it that the one time I actually gun for the zero-karma Funny mod, I get the positive-karma In* mods? :P

  40. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Maxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

    For $29 dollars you can get 128k DSl from sympatico, without needing an extra phone line. Your paying $50 for dial up. Hmmm.

    That' what my parents have, and it just what this guy wants. He needs to research local options.

  41. DSL for $25/month by aclarke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought DSL for some friends as a present for a year for $25 per month from Sonic.net. From what my friends have told me they have been very happy with the service. If you look somewhere like DSLReports.com you might find that DSL in your area costs less than you think.