Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Pioneers Industry To Get Left in the Dust?

prostoalex writes "The New York Times profiles Netflix, the company that pioneered subscription-based DVD plans where a disc is sent via postal service and no late fee is charged. It describes the company from May 1998, when it originally launched the Web site as a DVD-by-mail rental service (with late fees). Interesting factoids: Netflix operates 30 centers around the country and 11% of San Francisco residents subscribe to the service. Turns out, the company is not really afraid of Blockbuster, Wal-mart and Amazon moving into their markets, but they do consider on-demand Internet-download services to be a threat to their business model."

28 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. TiVo, Netflix, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who is the third?! Deaths always come in threes.

    1. Re:TiVo, Netflix, ... by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Funny

      TiVo, Netflix, Who is the third?! Deaths always come in threes.

      Apple. They pioneered the personal computer industry but are now dying a slo.... oh wait

      --
      Little Bricklets
  2. Internet? by nuclear305 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "but they do consider on-demand Internet-download services to be a threat to their business model."

    In the US? Please. With current broadband conditions I'd probably have to wait longer than snailmail to get a DVD.

    1. Re:Internet? by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " I know you were joking, but IMHO downloading movies is not that far off.

      I have been downloading episodes of "Lost" because the quality is quite a bit better than my (analog) cable TV. Yet the files are only about 350 MB in size. That translates to a little over 1 megabit per second. In practice, my internet connection (Comcast) doesn't seem to have any problem exceeding 1 megabit per second. (It is 3 or 4 mbps claimed)."


      Actually I was very serious. Who wants to watch a 750mb xvid movie on a 52" HDTV? I would expect to be downloading a near 1:1 DVD quality movie--which is typically 4.6-8.7GB.

      Now, I could probably easily download a full dvd within a matter of hours on my connection--but not everyone has the luxury of bandwidth and not restricted by transfer caps.

      How would these be distributed? I'd suspect a direct system such as FTP would be expensive considering most bandwidth at the minimum is $30/mbit when purchased in mass quantities (read: 100mbit->GigE) Bittorrent? Right...I love bittorrent as much as the next person but truthfully I rarely max out my line downloading something from bittorrent and I still find FTP faster when downloading linux iso's (some in DVD format...) Not to mention the fact that your average user will not be happy having to pay for a service and then sacrifice upstream bandwidth to feed a service like bittorrent.

      I would like to have a movie at the click of a button too...but it's not going to happen until the network infrastructure can handle the bandwidth requires, when the costs are affordable to users. And, I'll say it again--compressed video isn't going to fly.

  3. Canadians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Zip.ca is basically a Canadian version of Netflix. I'm really enjoying my subscription.

  4. MPAA's Move by TGK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the question then becomes, what will the MPAA do? Netflix is probably right, as long as they run a open ended service w/out late fees, they're set. Blockbuster is still tied to a brick and morter establishment that prevents them from really running Netflix into the ground, Amazon and Walmart while in possession of huge amounts of $$$ aren't first to market on this.

    Fundamentaly, when someone thinks of mail delivered DVDs they think netflix.

    They're right, download on demand movies are the only real threat they face, and that decision remains up to the MPAA. A legal download option stands to one-up netflix simply because it removes the need for postage.

    Of course, there is still the bandwidth/time/storage problem to contend with, but time should solve those for any theoretical on demand download site.

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  5. Netflix vs Blockbuster and Walmart by crazyprogrammer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work as a mail carrier and I see a lot more netflix dvds than blockbuster or walmart dvd rentals. In fact I didn't even know walmart had dvd rentals until I delivered some to a house.

    Something I've noticed about netflix is that they always send dvds in groups of 3, where blockbuster and walmart might send one.

    --
    "the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to it." - Grandpa Simpson
    1. Re:Netflix vs Blockbuster and Walmart by michaelhood · · Score: 4, Funny

      by crazyprogrammer (412543)..

      I work as a mail carrier

      "Actually I make more money selling magazines than I ever did at Initrode!"

  6. Impact of Netflix seen in Blockbuster by Staplerh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While Netflix may feel that on-demand Internet-download services are a threat to their business model, it is truly signifigant that Blockbuster viewed Netflix as a threat to their physical-store business model.

    I believe the rise of Netflix was instrumental in their adopting their 'no-late-fees' policy (I know some exceptions apply), and this was mentioned by many pundits around the time of Blockbuster's move.

    Blockbuster's move and the related coverage for Netflix/zip.ca introduced a lot of people to the whole industry - the people that wondered why Blockbuster would do such a move. Great P.R. for Netflix and zip.ca.

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
  7. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by buddahfool · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wierd, I have been a long time subscriber and they have never done this to me. As a matter of fact they just opened a new distro center close to me and I can easily get 3 sets of movies in two weeks if I return them the same day direct to the Post Office... I have tried Blockbuster, walmart and Netflix and Netflix had the best selection and turn around time.

  8. A good Netflix alternative... by Avoid_F8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    is GreenCine. It has an enormous selection and actual customer support. It's not one of the huge corporations like Blockbuster or Amazon, but rather like your friendly local rental shop.

    I've found that Netflix "throttles" my rentals after a period when I rent too many movies for them to make a profit. They will delay shipments and change the wait status on your queue to absurd amounts of time. I'm led to believe that this practice will become even more common with the new price drop. This is, of course, against their terms of service, but it's extremely difficult to prove - the USPS bears much of the blame. Couple this with the nonexistant customer service, and the frequent movie renter is definitely at a disadvantage.

    Of course, if you only rent two or three movies a month, then Netflix is fine. But for those who really like film, I'd highly recommend supporting GreenCine.

  9. Pioneers get the arrows... by mr_majestyk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and settlers get the land.

  10. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by Norny · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have to rebut to defend Netflix. I happen to live by the post office that serves the PO Box for the Orlando Netflix warehouse. I consistently get very good turnaround unless I get to a popular movie on my list like when Kill Bill came out, in which case they just send the next movie on my list. If I mail on Monday, they get it on Tuesday, I get the movie back on Wednesday or Thursday, depending on when my individual USPS delivery guy gets it sorted into his route.

  11. They Did Porn At The Beginning by blueZhift · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, Netflix did rent Adult DVDs in their early years, then quietly dropped it around the time they began to get more press. They never had anything hard core, just stuff along the lines of Girls Gone Wild. I guess you'd call it blue. Some of the Japanese idol stuff was rather interesting, they even had some hentai...or so I heard...;-)

  12. I doubt this is true + blockbuster vs. Netflix by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have been a netflix subscriber for about 6 months now. They advertise unlimited accounts, but hold your shippments even when they are in stock to slow you down if you start getting too many. This is my last month. Can anyone recomend another?

    I've been a Netflix subscriber for almost 2 years, blockbuster for maybe about 3 months now and I am probably the most hated customer at Netflix.com and blockbuster.com

    If I send out a movie on say Monday, I get that movies replacement by at least Friday. Everytime.

    You see, I have a movie addiction and watch about 6+ movies a week ( never watch television or play video games otherwise though, so this translates to well under 10hrs/week of tube-time ).

    I watch and return movies to netflix and blockbuster.com as fast as they send them usually. Overall I get to watch about the same amount of movies from each. That is 3-4 movies per week.

    Netflix has always been honest, and blockbuster reasonalbly so as well. Blockbuster has a gimmick price though ( $15.99 is introductory, it's actually $25/mn ), but they give 2 instore rentals per month ( which I need for quick fixes ).

    The difference is the web interface. Blockbuster's is clumsy. You don't get your recommendations on the first page like Netflix does. Netflix gives me, personally better movie recommendations but that maybe because have rated almost 700 movies with them. Netflix also gives links of critic links and customer reviews on every movie page. You can even see how many customers have rated a movie. Blockbuster's killer feature to me is that you can search movies by writer. Netflix needs this badly.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  13. Netflix Discriminates Against Regular Users by meehawl · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course, no /. discussion of Netflix could be complete without revisiting how Netflix discriminates against regular users by retarding delivery of their discs in favour of immediate availability for new members...

    --

    Da Blog
  14. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 4, Informative


    Along thoes same lines here's a couple of other links. Here's the delay calculation Netflix denies:
    Enter a reasonable 10,10,3-at-a-time

    Here's a study done on rentals to prove it.

    Take a look at what happens to availability of movies right after you pay for the next month.

    Oh, if you cancel 1 day after renewing, you have 7 days to send everything back and you loose the rest of the month.

  15. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I return them the same day direct to the Post Office...

    A shorter way to say it is "I own a DVD-RW".

  16. Yes, well, welcome to business by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They should fear competition, mainly because their service is very easily copied. There is little to differentiate them from competitors.

    Seriously: Netflix ships movies for a flat monthly fee. So does Blockbuster and companies X, Y, and Z. What makes it better? Nothing? Well, then we compete on price and margins go out the window.

    It's basic business 101: if you have a strong differentiator (my product is better and no one else can sell it), you can charge more and make money. If you can't, you wind up in a commodity market and you make a lot less...or get trampled by a larger competitor, go through a consolidation wave, etc.

    A good example is Tivo. First to market. Good product. Not really anything unique or hard to copy. Now facing stiff competition.

    Yes, good customer service should matter, but honestly in these kinds of businesses it's really a self-service kind of deal. Sure if they ship you Patch Adams III when you were waiting for Back Door Housewives Vol 14 you will call up and complain but you're not building a real relationship here.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  17. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by Long-EZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been a Netflix subscriber for about a year. At first they were great. Three movies, one day to return them and a day to ship them. I could watch about five movies a week. Then, Netflix realized postage was eating them alive and announced they were going to increase their price from something like $20/mo to $22/mo. The same week, Amazon and Blockbuster both introduced their services for something like $18/mo. Netflix immediately retracted their cost increase and announced a price matching reduction, and THAT'S when they started the big slowdown that made sure that I received at most three movies a week, assuming no USPS holidays. The policy of "as many as you want as long as it isn't more than 3/week" is cheesy weasely. They should just be honest and charge a flat rate per movie, or offer a flat monthly rate for a service not to exceed X DVDs per month, and get back to shipping without an artificial delay. I don't expect them to lose money, but as customers, we should inundate them with emails, calls and letters demanding they deal honestly and treat us with some common decency instead of lying. I know that's what marketing people do, but we shouldn't let them get away with it.

    Around the same time they started emailing to ask me when I received a DVD. I always told them a day later than the actual day I received the DVD to try to beat their scheduled delay BS, but I don't think it worked.

    Still, three movies a week is not too bad. Any more and my productivity would suffer. It's about $1.70 per DVD. My local library charges $1 per day, but they don't have many titles and I have to go there to get them. Netflix is a MUCH better deal. I like the convenience of internet browsing, wide selection, deep stocking (seldom a wait if I want a title), and delivery and pickup at my mailbox.

    It takes me 30-60 minutes to get a movie at Blockbuster, and I average a movie a minute browsing online at Netflix. I don't know why it's so much more efficient, but it is. That's the real value of Netflix. There are over 100 movies in my queue and it's on autopilot. Whenever I want something special, clicky clicky, top of the queue, here it comes.

    I can see why they'd consider online movie distribution a competing technology, and why they'll probably try to be first into that market as well. It's the only way I can see it being more convenient than their current DVD service. Of course downloaded movies will be horribly encumbered with Digital RESTRICTIONS Management. I have a couple of friends who are building significant DVD collections by ripping Netflix movies.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  18. Really? by roshi · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the site you link to, and in turn from Netflix Customer support on the issue at hand:
    "In determining priority for shipping and inventory allocation, we give priority to those members who receive the fewest DVDs through our service. As a result, those members who receive the most movies may experience next-day shipping and receive movies lower in their Queue more often than our other members. By prioritizing in this way, we help assure a balanced experience for all our members. Those that rent a lot of movies get a great value and those with lighter viewing habits are able to count on our service to meet their limited needs."
    As a netflix customer who gets a lot of DVDs, and whose DVDs have sometimes been slow in coming, this seems extremely reasonable.

    Just my $0.02.
  19. Re:Could it be? by el-spectre · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are like a dozen sites out there that do this.

    I hear. From my friends. At church.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  20. This is true. by slashkitty · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is true. The other post on this was moderated troll by the netflix loving mods.

    http://www.hackingnetflix.com/

    I noticed a significant decline in shipping speed in the 3rd month and have filed a complaint with my states attorney general.

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
  21. Re:Could it be? by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Greencine already rents out porn, although the main focus is foreign and indie titles. The idea of renting porn dozens of other people have had their hands on doesn't sound appealing to me.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  22. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    • I think they're service is just fine, if you don't like it take your dvd-copy-as-many-as-i-can-in-a-month butt elsewhere

    I have to agree. I've had netflix for a couple years and honestly, the three at a time subscription provides me with more than I actually need. I can't imagine who has the time to watch a couple movies per day and have a life, but for you guys, get a subscription to BOTH Blockbuster and Netflix and you'll never have to leave the couch!

    For what it's worth, I did try Blockbuster for a month because it is a tiny bit cheaper, but when it appeared that they were missing an entire season of Voyager (the 4th I think), I canned them. They had all the other seasons - I just couldn't find a single episode from the season I wanted to see - not by any search pattern or even through a time consuming browse. And in response to whoever writes back saying I'm an idiot because it exists and I was to stupid to find it, I don't care. Blockbuster's search/browse interface was flawed enough to make finding the season hard and was reason enough for me to stick with Netflix.
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  23. I rent from both, for now... by chipset · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been with NetFlix for about a year. I have enjoyed the service and find the website easy to use. I am a tab browsing addict and open a ton of pages at once. Browsing one page at a time is too slow, even over broadband. So, the Netflix site rules for ease of navigation.

    I return movies the day after I receive them, most of the time. A few months ago, I decided to try BlockBuster. The net service is a little cheaper and I can also get two instore rentals a month. The big advantage is the games.

    So, I am finally catching up on movies and I need to decide which service to keep. Here's the kicker: Both places have service centers in Denver. So, my movies go to Denver no matter what. However, BlockBuster's service is constantly faster. They claim the post office notifies them of which movies are sent for return and cross ship. This gives me a couple more rental periods each month.

    For example, after Christmas, I sent 6 movies back to NFLX and BB on the same day. All three BB movies arrived before the first two from NFLX. What gives?

    So, for me, after I receive my last two movies in my queue, I am cancelling the NFLX account. However, I do wish BlockBuster.com was easier to navigate...

    I root for the underdog, but I am also a capitalist. Therefore, I go with the cheaper service that gets the movies to me fastest. And on both accounts, it is currently BlockBuster.

    just my two cents.

  24. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by jpatters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thought Experiment: Suppose a Netflix customer does not have time to watch all three DVDs the day they arrive. They copy them to a hard drive, mail them back that day, watch them all in the two day time they are in the mail, and then delete them before getting the notice from Netflix that they have been received. Illegal? Probably. Unethical?

    Suppose they keep them on the hard drive for the five day window from the day they are received to the day they get the next set? An interesting question...

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
  25. Re:Netflix is a Dishonest Company by Jayzz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Unethical

    Probably that too. It's like taking out food to eat later from an all-you-can-eat buffet.

    Their whole buisniess model depends on the assumption that average turn around time is not that short. Every time you send back your DVD to get new ones, it costs them money. By copying contents to hard disk, you shorten the time abnormally, thus cost them more.