Slashdot Mirror


Exultant

Motor writes "Stephen Baxter is a remarkably prolific British hard science-fiction author -- one of many that have come to prominence in Britain over the last ten years or so. Exultant is the second part of his Destiny's Children series (no Beyonce jokes, please). The first part, Coalescent, was also reviewed on Slashdot. Set in both 400 A.D. and modern times, Coalescent dealt with the possibility of humans lapsing into a eusocial society (a hive). How would such a thing get started? How would it function? And how would it hide itself from 'normal' human society? At the end of the novel, the action jumps forward twenty-thousand years to when humanity has spread out across the galaxy and is cleaning out worlds which have become coalescent. This is where Exultant begins... or rather, it seems to begin." Read on for the rest of Motor's review. Exultant author Stephen Baxter pages 490 publisher Gollancz rating 9 reviewer Motor ISBN 0345457889 summary The second book of the Destiny's Children novels

Exultant is not a direct sequel to Coalescent, in that it doesn't pick up the story of George Poole and continue it. The concept of coalescence plays little part in this new novel -- so anyone expecting more of the same may be disappointed, but not for long. Once you start reading Exultant, it quickly becomes clear that the Destiny's Children novels are part of the Xeelee sequence (something that was not obvious in the first novel). The Xeelee sequence is a future history, mapped out by Baxter, in which humanity spreads out from Earth; is crushed and enslaved; frees itself; and in a much harder and violent form begins to assimilate and destroy other alien cultures, all the while being unaware of the larger and more important cosmic battle being fought all around it.

At the opening of Exultant, humanity is close to the end of its third wave of assimilation. It has spread across the galaxy crushing everything in its way -- even the mysterious and powerful Xeelee have retreated into the core of the galaxy. The whole of human society is held together unchanged across millions of light-years and billions of worlds by the Druz doctrines -- ruthless rules intended to keep humanity conquering and to punish any deviations from the human norm. The result is a human society turned into a colossal war machine, dedicated to one aim: the destruction of its last enemy, the Xeelee. But the war machine has been stalled for thousands of years. The Xeelee have no intention of leaving the galactic core, and their advanced technology (nightfighters constructed out of flaws in space-time itself) and ability to manipulate time means that every human assault is repelled easily. Trillions of human lives are wasted by hurling themselves at Xeelee defenses ... and it goes on and on. A war machine with billions of worlds full of generations of soldiers barely in their teens born in tanks and dying in thousand-year-long projects aimed at smashing the Xeelee, and knowing nothing but training, the doctrines and death. Whether in a coalescent hive or a not, it seems most human lives are spent in an empty drone-like struggle governed by simple rules -- indeed this message pervades the novel. In Coalescent the rules governing the eusocial society were:

Sisters matter more than daughters.
Ignorance is strength.
Listen to your sisters.

In Exultant the rules are the Druz doctrines, with a key part being 'A brief life burns brightly.'

In the middle of this multi-millennial slaughter, a young pilot, Pirius, and his crew decide to disobey doctrine and instead of throwing their lives away in a pointless heroic gesture they try a bold strategy. As a result they capture a Xeelee nightfighter, which is the first significant development in the war for hundreds of generations. Naturally, the rigid doctrinal bureaucracy chooses to prosecute him rather than promote him -- but with a twist. Thanks to his faster than light travel, Pirius has arrived back a few years before he left. Time is a malleable thing in this war and meeting oneself isn't unusual.

He arrives back to find himself still in training, and both Piriuses must be punished: one for breaking doctrine and the other to make sure he doesn't in future. His saviour is a strange Earth commissioner (part of the powerful bureaucracy controlling the war effort) who is desperate for a way to unlock the stalemate with the Xeelee and bring to an end the waste of life. He needs someone willing to step outside the rules -- even if it is only a little at first. So begins the split story of Pirius Red and Pirius Blue. One sent to a punishment camp to train as Xeelee cannon fodder, and the other taken back to Earth to see a solar system radically changed by alien occupation, thousands of years of industrial activity and a society at the core of the war effort that is not as doctrinally pure as he'd been brought up to believe.

No-one will ever accuse Stephen Baxter of thinking small. His Xeelee sequence novels are set in a universe teeming with life since the first fraction of a second after the Big Bang -- and indeed before that -- and a war that has raged between dark matter life-forms and baryonic life such as the Xeelee (with humans as a self-destructive nuisance ignorant of the larger conflict), for most of that time.

Exultant is a story of individual human courage and brilliance, and collective human stupidity and self-destruction. Those who dislike Baxter's work (and there are some!) because it is pessimistic about humanity as a whole will find nothing to change their minds here. On the other hand, anyone looking for hard science-fiction of breathtaking scope and bursting with invention and ideas will love it. Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing where he goes with the next part. One advantage of following Baxter's work is that you rarely have long to wait between novels.

You can purchase Exultant from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

128 comments

  1. Author could have done some research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they spread out from earth and the galaxy is the milky way, then it's only 100,000 light years. Not millions.

    1. Re:Author could have done some research by Motor · · Score: 1

      Correct... it was a bit of a thinko on my part. I got caught up in all the billions.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
  2. Going back in Time by sameerdesai · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the review " Time is a malleable thing in this war and meeting oneself isn't unusual." Uhoh.. I am in a infinite loop.. mass cloning of myself.. here I come..

    1. Re:Going back in Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like a documentary I saw a few years ago, it'll all end when three sameerdesai get a pizza place out in Florida.

  3. Dragon's egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is it any better than Dragon's Egg.

    That's what's kept me away from hard scifi since forever.

    1. Re:Dragon's egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Forward was never known for his characters or his writing that's true, but his ideas are very good.

    2. Re:Dragon's egg by mbrother · · Score: 1

      Just because something is hard sf doesn't mean it's badly written or whatever. You don't like Forward, ok, try a Baxter book or some other (with or without "Dragon" in the title). I'm partial to Vernor Vinge, Joe Haldeman, Greg Egan, and Jack McDevitt myself.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  4. Stephen Baxter rocks by metlin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    His Manifold series (Manifold Space, Time & Origin) are simply too good. I've not read the Destiny's Children series, but if it's anything like his other works, I can be sure it would be damn cool.

    And anyone else notice that Wikipedia is awfully slow or down these days? I wonder why.

    1. Re:Stephen Baxter rocks by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

      Can I mod you "half interesting half off topic" ? ;-)

    2. Re:Stephen Baxter rocks by metlin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Can you mod you "confused, welcome to slashdot" ? ;-)

    3. Re:Stephen Baxter rocks by bwcarty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Perhaps Wikipedia's problems are related to the lingering effects of this.

    4. Re:Stephen Baxter rocks by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ehh, I read Manifold Time, and I didn't like it that much. I couldn't suspend disbelief to buy into the whole "Blue-babies causing all space travel in any and every form to be banned" thing. It just stopped me dead in my tracks (especially since I've been seeing that premise far too often since Fallen Angels).

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    5. Re:Stephen Baxter rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but you can mod this redundant.

    6. Re:Stephen Baxter rocks by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      tastes are just that.

      Personally, the Manifold series was so bad that I vowed never to pay another dollar to him. Indeed, I want my money back for the last book in that series, where I was reduced to reading about pregnant gorillas.

      So bad it tainted his good stuff (which he has written some, but earlier in his career)

  5. Sounds original... by Staplerh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hah, I must admit I was chuckling as I read through this, part of me wondering how this ended up on the front page of Slashdot - but hey, it was better than another dupe.

    Some choice snippets really looked great though, especially this one:

    Naturally, the rigid doctrinal bureaucracy chooses to prosecute him rather than promote him -- but with a twist.

    I liked that. Take a standard literary cliche, but add a 'twist'. Well, it all certainly sounds like a 'tiwst' on convention, what with all the scifi jargon and strange sounding alien names. I know that sounds flippant, but it is cool. I must admit, this following part was funny though too:

    One advantage of following Baxter's work is that you rarely have long to wait between novels.

    Hah, is that an advantage.. or a disadvantage?

    Sounds a little unoriginal and.. weird. But hey, who am I to condemn a book that I haven't read. Oh, slashdot. Maybe if I see it in the bookstore I'll pick it up, I'll see what other readers say.

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
    1. Re:Sounds original... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      The review instantly made me think of 1984. "Strange Earth Commissioner" as O'Brien. anyone?

    2. Re:Sounds original... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      THey're making it to a move starring Sean Connery as the talking pie.

    3. Re:Sounds original... by nine-times · · Score: 3, Funny
      I liked that. Take a standard literary cliche, but add a 'twist'.

      I thought "taking a standard literary cliche, but adding a 'twist'," was the most standard literary cliche.

    4. Re:Sounds original... by poopdeville · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Brain... melting...

      Take a standard literary cliche, like taking a standard literary cliche and adding a twist, and add a twist. Clever. We've added two twists to a standard literary cliche. But we still end up with a standard literary cliche. By induction, standard literary cliches are closed under twists.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    5. Re:Sounds original... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Sounds a little unoriginal

      Hah! I've read a half-dozen of Baxter's books and while mildly entertaining, "original" is not the word I'd use. Basically he has one story: mankind's war against an ancient race called the Xeelee. Every book is a retelling of the same story, with diffferent characters. Yawn. I thought Coalescent was going somewhere new, but sadly it has descended into the same old plot by the end of the book.

      Now some great authors are: Neal Asher, Richard Morgan and Alastair Reynolds. Really if I were Baxter and I read any of their books, I would weep with shame at the lameness of my own offerings.

    6. Re:Sounds original... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Or take a literary cliche, and *don't* add a twist. Now *that* would be a twist on the standard-literary-cliche-with-a-twist cliche.

    7. Re:Sounds original... by miu · · Score: 1
      Yeah, Baxter is SF junk food - I'll read it if I want something new and there is nothing else around, but he has a tendency toward glibness and repetitiveness that make his work too silly to be very good (failings he shares with his old co-author Jerry Pournelle which did not help their collaborations).

      I've seen a couple Brits mention Alastair Reynolds as being worth reading, but I never find him in the bookstore - guess I'll just have to order online.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    8. Re:Sounds original... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked that. Take a standard literary cliche, but add a 'twist'. Well, it all certainly sounds like a 'tiwst' on convention, what with all the scifi jargon and strange sounding alien names.

      Yes, well.. being a Scifi book review in the scifi section on a geek website it likely will contain jargon and strange names. Are you sure you're in the right place?

      > One advantage of following Baxter's work is that you rarely have long to wait between novels.

      Hah, is that an advantage.. or a disadvantage?

      It's an advantage if you follow Baxter's work... you did read the sentence you just replied to, didn't you? You criticised slashdot for posting dupes... I'd criticise it much more for having readers who would mod-up an obviously mentally subnormal poster like yourself.

    9. Re:Sounds original... by Caraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But the trick is to just add a half-twist to it. Then you get a Mobius cliche, a story that has only one side to it. All character-driven conflict gets poured into a Klein bottle from which it is both inside and outside the story, and cops in the story start dunking mugs into coffee doughnuts.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    10. Re:Sounds original... by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Hi,

      Maybe you can fill me in. I'm a HUGE fan of Peter F. Hamilton's Night's Dawn trilogy and his Fallen Dragon, though I seriously disliked Misspent Youth.

      How does this compare? Am I missing out on something?

    11. Re:Sounds original... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Seemed reminiscent of Cordwainer Smith's Instrumentality of Mankind.

    12. Re:Sounds original... by mbrother · · Score: 1

      I've read his first, Revelation Space, which I liked, although it took me some time to get into it. He's the only professional astronomer I know other than myself currently publishing sf novels. Physicists, yes, piles of them it seems, but not so many astronomers.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  6. Skip chapter 14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You see, Pirius is gay, and chapter 14 is when he meets himself and, well, I won't spoil it, but skip chapter 14.

    1. Re:Skip chapter 14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      God, I hate it when I run into a perfectly good sci-fi book that's suddenly spoiled by damned homosexual agenda. I can't even recommend sci-fi to my kids anymore since it seems to be infested with sadomasochism and a penchant for anal sex.

    2. Re:Skip chapter 14 by Lobo93 · · Score: 2

      You see, Pirius is gay, and chapter 14 is when he meets himself and, well, I won't spoil it, but skip chapter 14.

      Well, at least it gives a new meaning to the phrase "Go fuck yourself"! Bwahahahaaaahhaaaaaaaaaa......

      *sigh*

      :Note to self: No drinkin' and slashdottin'...

      --
      "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
    3. Re:Skip chapter 14 by snuf23 · · Score: 1
      Well if it's fucking yourself in sci-fi that you are concerned with, the classic novel is of course:

      The Man Who Folded Himself

      More self fucking than you can shake a, ahem, stick at.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    4. Re:Skip chapter 14 by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Heinlein did it best, and perhaps first, in All You ZombiesAll You Zombies, 1959. The protagonist is an orphan, born as a female, later gets pregnant, has a child, while giving birth the doctors discover she is a hermaphrodite, and as her uterus was destroyed, convert her into a male who grows up to be recruited into the Time Corps, who later goes back to seduce herself, then kidnaps the baby, takes it back 20 years to leave it at an orphanage...

    5. Re:Skip chapter 14 by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think installing Microsoft SQL Server is the most horrifying way to f*ck yourself.

      (I'm not an MS basher, but I hate that thing.)

    6. Re:Skip chapter 14 by tomsuchy · · Score: 1

      John Varley, in "Steel Beach", has a character and his clone have sex, after one of them has a sex change.

      --
      this isn't a sig. i type this (including the two dashes), every time i post, just to make it look like a sig.
    7. Re:Skip chapter 14 by mbrother · · Score: 1

      Very good, classic book, by David Gerrold (who shows up here on /. from time to time). I think the vocal minority who hate it just get turned off by this element (although stylistically I can see the book rubbing some readers the wrong way, too).

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  7. This sounds like a dystopia by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The review makes the book sound like an enormous dystopia: I have seen the future, and it is horrible. Dystopias succeed, when they do, by pointing out dangerous trends in the present, and showing what could happen if they're allowed to grow unchecked. Nothing in the review gives any suggestion of that, and without the insight into today, a dystopia is simply depressing and morose. Even so, it's a good review, because it told me exactly why I personally wouldn't want to read this. If you're interested in this type of thing, I hope you enjoy it.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:This sounds like a dystopia by wondafucka · · Score: 1
      Or dystopias succeed by revealing the futility of knowing our own futility.

      I think I'm beginning to see the light. If you know your control loop is critically underdamped, and that knowledge can't change the control loop, you'd better find something better to do for the next 50~60 years. Oh wait, it's just a book. Crap.

    2. Re:This sounds like a dystopia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the review it seems the author is more interested in setting a background than presenting a philosophical issue ,i.e. the dystopic/utopic fiction of the early twentieth century. Its fairly common in science fiction to use a dystopic background, particularly in films (Matrix, Blade Runner, Star Wars). There are some exceptions such as ST:TNG and Iain M. Banks Culture series but its hard to pull off technoogy can fix anything science fiction and still maintain an exciting story.

    3. Re:This sounds like a dystopia by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > The review makes the book sound like an enormous dystopia: I have seen the future, and it is horrible.

      Interesting. The story works for me, because first of all, my reaction to the notion of humanity ending up "spread across the galaxy crushing everything in its way", powerful enough to waste trillions of lives and survive, is indeed "Exultation".

      > Dystopias succeed, when they do, by pointing out dangerous trends in the present, and showing what could happen if they're allowed to grow unchecked.

      And simultaneously, "a human society turned into a colossal war machine, dedicated to one aim: the destruction of its last enemy" is precisely what we have now -- and it applies whether you've chosen the side of America 2.0 or Allah 0.9 -- either way you're adopting "ruthless rules intended to keep [your notion of what it means to be] humanity conquering and to punish any deviations from [your ideal of] the human norm)

      > Even so, it's a good review, because it told me exactly why I personally wouldn't want to read this. If you're interested in this type of thing, I hope you enjoy it.

      No argument there. A future history in which we actually win such an otherwise pointless grudge match of a war sounds pretty interesting, particularly if we have to do so by transcending ourselves. For me, the best SF stories are simultaneously about humanity while being about transcending humanity. In that sense, I agree it's a good review. But I'm also sufficiently "interested in that type of thing" that it doesn't even sound dystopic. YMMV :)

    4. Re:This sounds like a dystopia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I think the Manifold Time proposed an unescapable dystopia. Eventually, the universe ends. What happens then? What happens to everything alive then, what will it do? There's no way to avoid the heat death, except as in the book by blowing a big hole in the universe somehow. Do you really think there's any other endgame for the universe?

    5. Re:This sounds like a dystopia by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      I don't know, I think the Manifold Time proposed an unescapable dystopia. Eventually, the universe ends.

      The eventual heat-death of the Universe does not, in and of itself, create a dystopia. All things must come to an end eventually, and a future in which mankind accepts this isn't a dystopia. A story where the last few remnants of life are warring over the few remaining energy sources trying to stave off personal extinction at the cost of killing everybody else would be dystopic.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  8. The Time Ships by GMontag451 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've read Manifold Time and Manifold Space, and while interesting, they didn't really engage me. The two books of his that I've read and really enjoyed were The Time Ships, his authorized sequel to H.G. Wells' The Time Machine, and Vacuum Diagrams, a collection of short stories set in the Xeelee Sequence mentioned in the review.

    1. Re:The Time Ships by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Baxter's SteamPunk novel Anti-Ice is also very good. It deals with the discovery of a stable form of anti-matter by Victorian era civilization. This "anti-ice" is stable and can be reacted with regular ice to produce power. He also has a really good short story collection called Traces which is unfortunately hard to find in the US but has some absolutely fantastic stories in it such as "Moon Six" and "Weep for the Moon", which actually made me tear up.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  9. excellent book by harshaw · · Score: 1


    I found this to be a very enjoyable book with many fresh concepts. You don't need to read the first book.

  10. MMORPG designers take note by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > Trillions of human lives are wasted by hurling themselves at Xeelee defenses ... and it goes on and on. A war machine with billions of worlds full of generations of soldiers barely in their teens born in tanks and dying in thousand-year-long projects aimed at smashing the Xeelee, and knowing nothing but training, the doctrines and death. Whether in a coalescent hive or a not, it seems most human lives are spent in an empty drone-like struggle governed by simple rules

    There's your PvE and PvP options. There's your mindless hordes of PCs grinding their way to mastery. There's your Galactic War that's a perpetual stalemate.

    And there's your 10,000,000 year story arc (Baxter's universe, FTL/time travel), followed by an opportunity for a player or two per month to break the mold and change the universe for the next time around, and punctuated by new content whenever Baxter writes some more backstory in the form of another novel.

    Unlike every MMORPG universe to date, Baxter's sounds like an interesting universe to live in, even if your marketing department says "don't forget to put in a treadmill for the powergrinder set". And unlike most serial SF (or SciFi, or fantasy) works, it also sounds like a universe that's close enough to a game environments MMORPG designers are capable of making. Anyone crazy enough to steal some concepts? Maybe even steal Baxter himself?

  11. Convalesent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Destiny's Children after great illness the children are back in action!

  12. Of hives and genetics by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm somewhat skeptical of hives for humans because of the differences between human genetic structures and the genetic structures of true hive makers (Hymenopterans e.g., bees, ants, and wasps).

    The hive construct arose in these insects because of a unique genetic quirk called haplodiploidy -- females are diploid (getting 2 copies of each chromosome, one from each parent) and males are haploid (getting a single copy of each chromosome from the mother only). This quirk makes females more related to their sisters than to their own daughters. If a bee, ant or wasp "wants" to be selfish, it foregoes having its own offspring and raises sisters. This creates the basis for a very strong social bond in which individuals maximize their own fitness by belonging to a group. Humans have no such genetic basis -- the bond for sociality is limited to a more transactional trade of social tit-for-tat.

    I like Stephen Baxter and will have to read this series to see if/how he addresses this issue.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Of hives and genetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, somebody's read their Dawkins, I see.

    2. Re:Of hives and genetics by djirk · · Score: 1

      Frank Herbert wrote a book called Hellstrom's Hive that involved a secret group of human hive dwellers. It's been a while since I read it but I liked it then.

    3. Re:Of hives and genetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. And someone didn't bother to read the appendix of the second edition. Naked mole rats, anyone?

    4. Re:Of hives and genetics by stonecypher · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, just because the bees happen to have a genetic mechanism to encourage hive behavior doesn't mean there aren't others, or in fact that such a thing is even required. You're trying too hard to map human desires and needs onto other biologies. Ants are too dumb to want things; their behavior is driven largely by lack of certain behaviors being adequately performed from their perspectives (very similar to the scratch an itch mechanism underlying some larger OSS projects, natch.)

      There are many non-haploiding hiving creatures, such as termites, the Japanese, and arguably some forms of gopher and wren - there's even a reasonable argument for the clownfish, which build up coral reefs and sacrifice one so that the rest of the school can escape, and the sequoia, which are entire forests as single entities and which intentionally kill edge trees to keep other plants from crossing soil borders.

      IANAEvolutionaryBiologist, but I suspect the primary reason that we see hiving occuring in tiny animals isn't about a particular biological mechanism at all, but rather the food requirements of a hive of things much larger. Transportation isn't cheap, and one of a hive's large vulnerabilities is that the population due to design cannot spread out to increase food available to the individual as do individual predators. As such, the hive is limited to the food sources available within an individual's travel. For this reason, one rarely sees a hive even near a desert border, because the half of the food region which is worthless means that area cannot sustain the hive even if the other half of the region is good. If one deals with a hive of larger creatures, that food cost spirals up stratospherically, which eventually pits the individual's needs directly against those of its hive; it's all well and good to ignore one's daughters in favor of one's sisters, but to ignore one's self in a setting due to food constraints means a significant portion of the population would be starving, meaning that a successful hive would be damned hard to create.

      As far as the bond for sociality, many biologists believe that altruism and samaritanism are deeply hard-wired into us, but at the tribal scale instead of the species scale, which is one good argument for the prevalence of racism and other forms of us-vs-them. Preserve the tribe at the expense of other tribes. Fits very well into the worldview wherein one thinks of creatures as vehicles for genes to spread.

      So, maybe it's not as cut and dried as you suggest.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  13. Coalescent + Xeelee by erichill · · Score: 1
    I thought that Peter's dark matter object in the George thread in Coalescent sounded a lot like the photino birds of the Xeelee saga. I'm far from tired of that universe, so I'm glad to see more.

    I really enjoyed how the Regina and George threads finally merged in the first book. Baxter is one of those authors who is good at keeping a lot of things going on at once without getting lost.

    I'm looking forward to reading the rest.

    --
    Credo sim. - I think I am.
  14. how would they live? by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "How would it function?"

    Probably just like any other eusocial society? With an egg laying queen, sterile female workers, and mouthless drones who live just long enough to mate? For a neat mammal example of this structure, see Nake mole rats.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:how would they live? by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 2, Funny

      mouthless drones who live just long enough to mate?

      sweet! all of us geeks will live forver!

    2. Re:how would they live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how would it function?"

      Well, the easiest way would be to drum up some fear of another group and... You'd have to question the loyalty of anyone who questions... Individual freedoms would have to be slowly curtailed... Uh oh.

    3. Re:how would they live? by prash_n_rao · · Score: 0

      mouthless drones who live just long enough to mate

      The mind and the mouth have an inverse relationship: when one is open, the other is closed.


      So, you say these Naked Mole Rat males are very open-minded?

      --
      This is not my sig.
  15. You Asked for It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exultant is the second part of his Destiny's Children series (no Beyonce jokes, please).

    You're obviously not ready for that jelly.

  16. Reading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's reading? I spend too much time playing EverQuest.

  17. Neo-con approved genetic manipulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    very strong social bond in which individuals maximize their own fitness by belonging to a group.

    Shush. Don't give the neo-cons any new ideas...

  18. So, it's bookilicious? by saddino · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exultant is the second part of his Destiny's Children series (no Beyonce jokes, please).

    Oops.

  19. Don't buy from Barnes and Noble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy it from amazon instead and make me money!

  20. Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Come on, we're all grown ups (well, some of us are)...doesn't anyone read anything outside of the scifi and fantasy realm???

    1. Re:Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by metlin · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that Slashdot does not talk about a lot of other stuff - topics that do not interest the general demography of the readers of nerd/geek population would attract far too few folks.

    2. Re:Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      I read lots of stuff outside Fantasy and Sci-Fi. It's just people don't bother to review it. However, FYI, Sci-Fi and Fantasy aren't just for kids. ;-)

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because non-speculative fiction is boring. If I want kitchen-sink realism, I have my own dull life, thank you very much. SF gives me hope and inspiration, contrary to mainstream soap.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you automatically assume that literature for adults can't be sci-fi or fantasy?

      I think someone has a few problems with their own prejudices.

      Oh, and geeks generally like sci-fi and fantasy. Simple as that. If we wanted to discuss the intricacies of a boy on a boat with a tiger, we'd head over to a forum designed more for that style of lit.

      Lastly, as is often suggested, if you don't like it you can always submit a review of your own.

    5. Re:Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      SF gives me hope and inspiration

      Obvious tripe like this, about time-travelling aliense or some such silliness, gives you hope and inspiration? How so?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    6. Re:Why are the fictions reviews scifi only???? by RealRav · · Score: 1

      Yes I do read outside of the speculative fiction genre, but I find Science Fiction to be the most interesting. Mainstream fiction tends to focus on the individual dealing with change(yes, most stories can be boiled down to that) while Science Fiction tends to deal with society as a whole dealing with change. The latter is more thought provoking and relevant in my opinion.

  21. More Naked Mole Rat Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the titties on these naked mole rats

    Now available for your perverted pleasure, rubber naked mole rats!

  22. Already Been Done? by kfrinkle · · Score: 1

    I suggest you all read Gregory Benford's (hard core sci-fi) Galactic Center series. Mr. Baxter obviously did. -karl http://karlfrinkle.net

    --
    -karl says 'disregard the spelling and grammar mistakes!'
    1. Re:Already Been Done? by adlj · · Score: 0

      I hope baxter is not as boring as benford... never managed to finish one of his books

  23. Boring snoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a toss about stupid sci fi book written by some 10th rate author.

    Give me Beyonce's butt instead.

  24. Strange coincedence? by null+etc. · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me share with you a strange event that just happened to me. It may be slightly offtopic, but is strongly reminiscent of this book review.

    I was just about to post to /. in order to try to get another Score 5, Funny, when all of the sudden I received an email from myself.

    Now, this is very dubious, since no one on my LAN would spoof an email to me. So I read it, and it said "Dear null etc., I know this sounds strange, but I am you, and must warn you (or me, for that matter) that you should not post to /. and get another Score 5, Funny. If you do (and I did, that's why I'm warning you), the consequences will be dire, and the overall quality of the posts on /. will decline."

    So I quickly deleted my post and sent this one instead. Now, I'll wait patiently and hope I don't get Score 5, Funny.

    1. Re:Strange coincedence? by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 1


      So I quickly deleted my post and sent this one instead. Now, I'll wait patiently and hope I don't get Score 5, Funny.

      You sure that delete key is working properly?

    2. Re:Strange coincedence? by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      I guess we live in a world which has doomed us to a certain fate.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    3. Re:Strange coincedence? by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1

      Of course, this is Slashdot.
      If your average Slashdotter came across a button that said "DO NOT PRESS, WILL DESTROY UNIVERSE" they would press it just to see if it was connected or not.

      --
      +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
    4. Re:Strange coincedence? by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      This post illustrates perfectly the idea that physics, even in the cases where time travel is allowed, does not allow paradoxes to happen.

    5. Re:Strange coincedence? by mbrother · · Score: 1

      I did this once with a fire alarm in high school. I thought it might be broken (seriously). It wasn't. I got off the hook since with my reputation they believed me.

      I'm also reminded of an old Dr. Who episode with the Daleks. The Doctor asks Davros, creator of the Daleks, if he would really press such a button given the choice. Davros comes back with something like, "To have that kind of power...and not use it? Yes, yes, I believe I would."

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  25. By golly you're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least Wikipedia agrees..

    "While it is increasingly common to place AD after a date, by analogy to the use of BC, formal English usage adheres to the traditional practice of placing the abbreviation before the year, as in Latin (e.g., 100 BC, but AD 100)."

  26. Your mom is hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and she's good value too, at $2.99 for a quickie.

  27. Baxter == Blah? by KingPrad · · Score: 1

    I've read 4 Baxter novels and found them thoroughly uninteresting. The story concepts were excellent, which kept me going back to try another. The writing was bland and uninteresting and the story never seemed to get anywhere. All the actual story where the concept is explored was compressed into the final chapter or two of the book. Everything up to that was people travelling here and there, being involved with unimportant and uninteresting side plots. The actual story was compressed into the last 2 chapters during which events progressed in a whirlwind.

    Anybody else feel the same about Baxter's books? It's been a few years since I read one, and maybe I would view them differently. Is it worth trying another?

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    1. Re:Baxter == Blah? by tachyonflow · · Score: 1
      The only Baxter book I've read is _The Light of Other Days_, and I was left with an impression similar to the one you describe. (To be fair, this book was co-written by Arthur C. Clarke, and I'm not sure what each author contributed.)

      The characters seemed bland, cardboard, and stereotyped. The basic concept of the book was interesting, though.

      I'll probably give Baxter another shot, since people speak highly of him, and I wouldn't want to judge him with one data point.

    2. Re:Baxter == Blah? by torako · · Score: 1

      I agree. I used to like Baxter's novels a lot, back when I was a kid and hadn't had a chance to start reading *good* novels.

      Baxter has awesome ideas but he just totally sucks as an author, his style is bland and uninteresting.

  28. It's worse than that. by khasim · · Score: 1

    Suffice to say it involves a knife and the first instance of a human engaging in auto-necrophilia.

    ewwwwwwww!

    But it was original.

    1. Re:It's worse than that. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Oh. My. God.

      I don't think that there's anything wrong with being gay, and I don't think there's anything wrong with masturbation, but for some reason the idea of fucking yourself is just kind of gross to me...

      Then, I read your post. Thanks, I'll never sleep again.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:It's worse than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... he's DEAD Jim (Dead Jim! DEAD Jim!)

      Its WORSE than that - He's DEAD Jim!

      Dead Jim! DEAD!"

      from "Star Trekkin' " by The Firm

  29. Re:Get your dates straight by Quelain · · Score: 1

    I prefer 400 C.E. thanks

    --
    Cthulhu loves you.
  30. To build a hive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm somewhat skeptical of hives for humans because of the differences between human genetic structures and the genetic structures of true hive makers (Hymenopterans e.g., bees, ants, and wasps). "

    The basis for a hive society doesn't have to have a genetic basis.* Technology will do nicely. Even chemical messengers could be a basis.

    *Some might even argue that some asian societies are a primitive form of hive.

  31. Why are the fictions reviews scifi only????-Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For the same reason that Slashdot does not talk about a lot of other stuff - topics that do not interest the general demography of the readers of nerd/geek population would attract far too few folks."

    Hey! Anyone want to discuss "How to get a woman"?

  32. Baxter == Blah?-End-Books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The actual story was compressed into the last 2 chapters during which events progressed in a whirlwind. "

    You might want to wait till the last two books.

  33. EUsocial, my fucking arse! by Tony+B+Liar · · Score: 0, Troll

    How does b******* sound. This word doesnt even exist never mind the "social" consequences of trying to get ppl to agree to being so. If you want to use eusocial then firstly look at the implications of the word you have just created. After that then look at the implications of having used a letter group such as EU, its like me using EA and not considering that theres a company / community that relates its identity to that acronym. Meanwhile, Europe and Britain goes to sleep and aint so bothered bout yer poor comment ;) meanwhile perhaps the usocial contract calls for something which we euro's aint found yet, possibly known as the capability of thinking for ourselves...

    1. Re:EUsocial, my fucking arse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? Eusocial is not a "made up" word: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eusocial Calm down.

    2. Re:EUsocial, my fucking arse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please clarify something for me - is this a poorly thought out troll, or an expression of extreme ignorance?

  34. Another nutshell review by Calroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Stephen Baxter is amongst the hardest of the hard sci-fi writers. I read a review of Coalescent, and in it, the reviewer described the end of the book as set in "a typical Baxterian universe". To me, there's no better way to describe it.

    Exultant, to me, is a story that could read as one of Baxter's masterpieces, if only he got a few more elements right. (Alas, that's not the first time I've thought that of his stories). The narrative often doesn't flow well, sometimes cutting to dry physics lectures, and feeling like a disjoint list of tasks that must be done, filling in time until we make it to the climax, which seems rushed. Also, there seem to me to be some fairly obvious plot holes... for instance, his faster-than-light travel doesn't create time paradoxes except at the beginning of the story, where it's a plot device.

    This is only a loose sequel to Coalescent, with some recurring themes. It's a very different book (as you may guess: one is set in Roman Britain and the other is 20,000 years in the future) but it also has a strong focus on hard physics. Some of this is at the expense of the characters... for instance, Baxter really needs to work on his romance writing, or (for preference) leave it out. But the action scenes were done well, and you really get the sense of the vast human empire and the insignifance of one little life.

    But the central theme, A brief life burns brightly, is strong, and Baxter explores it well. As usual, he's got plenty of fascinating ideas, like how life may have proliferated in the deep past, causing some events that we've otherwise put down to straight, lifeless physics...

    Even after all that? I'm hooked. I'm re-reading the story, and I haven't read anything from the Xeelee Sequence up until now, but that's next on the list.

    1. Re:Another nutshell review by mbrother · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since it has been suggested elsewhere in the thread that science fiction is only appropriate until you're fifteen or so, I thought I should sink to that level.

      Stephen Baxter is amongst the hardest of the hard sci-fi writers.

      I'm harder.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  35. Re:Get your dates straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call it what you want, but it's still based on Jesus. But that's ok, he loves you

  36. Subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Stephen Baxter is a remarkably prolific British hard science-fiction author -- one of many that have come to prominence in Britain over the last ten years or so. Exultant is the second part of his Destiny's Children series (no Beyonce jokes, please)."

    Uh huh huh huh, ...you said "hard"... huhuhuh

  37. see "Hellstrom's Hive", by Frank Herbert by MrSoundAndVision · · Score: 0

    from a reformed sci fi fan.

  38. The eu- prefix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The eu- prefix in 'eusocial' isn't a reference to europe. It's a latin-derived prefix meaning 'true' - hence, a eusocial society is truly social, rather than having only sporadic social behaviour between selfish individuals as our current society does.

    For comparison, see 'eukaryote' ('true nucleus'), 'eugenics' ('true genes'), etc.

    1. Re:The eu- prefix by adlj · · Score: 0

      I know I'm nitpicking, but 'Eu' comes from greek, not latin... (an italian slashdotter)

  39. Re:Get your dates straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who gets annoyed by the use of C.E. and B.C.E. in place of A.D. and B.C.? It's not for any religious reasons - I couldn't care less about them - but it's a pointless change of an established standard that only creates additional confusion.

  40. Nice Review by serutan · · Score: 1

    I'm going to have to check out this book. Personally I believe a hive-like state is the only long term survivable state for humanity, even though I don't like the idea. Any society with freedom of individual thought and action will self-destruct when technology advances to the point where free individuals can wield enough power to destroy it.

    Science fiction involving high-tech freedom fighters doesn't usually address the question of what happens after the Death Star blows up. At least in Star Wars we got to see that the Empire simply built another one. Surely it's obvious that various people will keep figuring out how to do the same thing. Eventually one of them will win, and once is all it takes.

  41. Obvious solution by serutan · · Score: 1

    Write a review of something else and submit it.

  42. Naked Mole Rats are supposed to be eusocial, by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 1

    What about them? What's the corresponding case with the rats?

  43. IMHO, Baxter sucks by edremy · · Score: 1

    I heard people raving about Titan, so I gave it a read.

    It was one of the worst books I ever suffered through. Totally unbeliveable plot, uninteresting, cardboard characters, bad, bad science and a deus ex machina ending that made no sense at all. A little bit better than Peter Hamilton-level dreck, but not much.

    I've avoided almost all of his stuff since, but the little I've read afterwards hasn't improved my opinion. Can a Baxter fan suggest something that might change my mind?

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:IMHO, Baxter sucks by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      I find Baxter really hit-or-miss.
      The first thing I ever read from him was Time Ships, and rather liked it. I recently read all of the Manifold series (I do not recommend doing this straight through), and was ultimately disappointed. Each book takes you through a bunch of different story threads that...ultimately go nowhere. The lonely humanity in the year 1x10^100, the sentient squid, the blue children, the ET robots, the waves of colonization, the wandering moon...none of them really mesh together. And I don't think I'll ever read Manifold: Origin again.
      I hated Titan. I didn't find one redeeming thing in that book. I can't think of any other books that have caused that sort of response from me.
      But, I loved Ring. I bought Vacuum Diagrams, and suspect I'll enjoy it, too.

    2. Re:IMHO, Baxter sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised you didn't like the first two books in the Manifold series... I thought they were a hugely enjoyable read. The final one Origin was disappointing and... well... a bit vile, but the first two... wow!

  44. Evolution by walmass · · Score: 1

    Evolution by Baxter is probably one of the best SF books I have read (starts 65 million years ago and goes to the end of earth). Highly recommended

  45. Re:Get your dates straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not DP and AP - During Paganism and After Paganism? BCE, etc. is arbitrary, political, and annoying. It was called BC and AD by the people who set the standard - change the name when you change the standard, rather than trying to pull some sneaky double-speak bullshit.

  46. This only shows how poorly you have read... by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Having read practically every manor scifi book/series and every significant fiction work available during my lifetime, I can tell you that by far the more meaningful fiction has been outside of scifi. Some scifi does have messaging beyond the geekspehere (Heinlein), but mostly we're talking about stuff you should have left behind when you were fifteen.

    1. Re:This only shows how poorly you have read... by mbrother · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then try reading some more, or keep your snobbery to yourself. Why not tell everyone what you think is so perfect and wonderful for those aged 16+? Then you can get some /. snobbery back (and I have no doubt equally passionate and honest snobbery) about how your particular choice isn't so great. I read inside and outside the genre, and while I would hope bright 15 year olds would enjoy my science fiction novels, I would also hope 16 year olds would.

      There are ideas -- deep, important ideas -- to explore about what it means to be human that can't be done in mainstream literature. Now, science fiction can be bad, but so can any literary form. It can also be great. Again, you could try reading some more. Don't limit yourself to the "major" sf books/series which are more likely to reach for the lowest common denominator to reach a broader audience. Look especially at Nebula Award winners, which are chosen by other writers, not the fans (although Nebula politics can skew results).

      Have you read Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner? How about Replay by Ken Grimwood? The Stars My Destination by Alfred Bester?

      At least you could keep quiet. It's pretty rude to wade into a conversation people are having only to proclaim that they're talking about something only kids should like.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  47. Haplodiploidy may help, but it's not required. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Termites are eusocial and diploid, not haplodiploid. Naked mole rats are also eusocial and diploid, as other posters mentioned.

    There are a lot of non-social haplodiploid wasps and bees, too. Some races of European honeybees have cheating workers that try to lay their own eggs for the other workers to raise instead of the queen's eggs.

    Other factors such as overlap of generations and group defense may be more important than chromosome count in the evolution of eusociality.

    Personally, I think humans are more likely to spin off a strain of social parasites than become eusocial. :P

  48. Love Baxter, hated Coalescent by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure if I should read the book or not, though undoubtedly I will end up doing so because there aren't that many talented sf writers broadly published, and because the review said it was in the Xeelee universe full of invention.

    Coalescent was an extremely frustrating book to read for someone who loves hard sf, speculative and "Golden Years of SF" style philosophical versions like Heinlein, Van Vogt, etc.

    After a long time of waiting for the other shoe to drop in Coalescent and the "real" sf story to start, I gave up being bored to tears and worked hard at getting into what was the only "historical" (well historical fantasy) novel I have read since maybe A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.

    I ended up liking the history part but found the ages long saga interminable and stifling . Sure the hive idea was cool but it could have made a series of short stories or a hard sf novel on its own, I thought. Hear's hoping that that is exactly what the new book is. Sounds a bit like Riddick though!

    Matt R.

  49. Hive Mind by RealRav · · Score: 1

    For another interesting take on the hive mind read "The Light of Other Days", co-written by Arthur C. Clark and Stephen Baxter. The hive mind concept is only a small part of the book, but the entire book is very readable and thought provoking.

  50. Only two choices? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >and it applies whether you've chosen the side of America 2.0 or Allah 0.9

    Some of us have chosen secularism and liberal democracy. We must be crazy not to participate in the "USA is #1" vs "Allah will punish" you nonsense the right wing has framed as a easy and pathetic frame to explain various extra-legal adventuring overseas.

  51. Inspiration? by thenightwatch · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of the Xeelee series before, but the plot seems very similar to Last And First Men by Olaf Stapledon, a very ambitious novel from 1930, a Sci-Fi classic.

    Not saying that's a bad thing... in fact, if Baxter has been influenced greatly by someone as wonderful as Stapledon, then the books are probably excellent, and I think I'll check them out.