Slashdot Mirror


Costa Rica May Criminalize VoIP

chia_monkey writes "Here's an interesting little tidbit about the 'free' Internet. Seems Costa Rica may make it a crime to make Internet-based phone calls. It would be a shame if this sets a precedent of setting legistlation that would seriously stunt the growth of these emerging technologies that should be making communication cheaper and easier, not harder and illegal."

72 of 407 comments (clear)

  1. Crime ? by mirko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This just seems so wrong : of all central american countries, Costa Rica is the only one without a confusing bloddy story, why would they start now ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  2. Panama/Paraguay? by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't this already happen in another South American country? I thought I read something about a year ago on a similar subject, where VOIP was going to be illegal to protect the state-owned telecommunications company.

    1. Re:Panama/Paraguay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Panama, phone carriers, aside from the monopoly, cannot carry domestic long distance calls. But the way some VOIP carriers get around this is by routing the traffic outside the country and then back again to complete a domestic long distance call.

      Believe it or not they can still do it cheaper than the national phone company.

  3. it's not yet by coolcold · · Score: 3, Informative

    criminalize....it's just the telecom company wants to criminalize it but somehow i think it would be interesting to see how they argue on their point

    --
    I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
  4. Great news from impoverished island... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    from socialism gone wrong... instead of developing state owned infrastructure to benefit society, develop state owned monopolies to fleece society.

    at least some verizon asshat didn't write that law. i'll take politicians writing stupid laws over corporate fascists any day.

    1. Re:Great news from impoverished island... by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, first:

      Costa Rica is NOT an island.

      Second: It's not at all impoverished, in fact it's flourishing.

      For many years, the state owned infrstructure did benefit society. Cellular and telephone rates are affordable at local prices, if you can obtain them. Now, it's a make-work project, inefficient, top-heavy, and on the edge of being privatised.

  5. Small step by johannesg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I suppose it is only a small step from saying "you are not allowed to transport data over this network if it encodes voice traffick" to "you are _only_ allowed to transport government-licensed data over this network".

    But hey, I'm not worried - I still have an acoustic modem somewhere in my house...

  6. As if one country could withstand change by 2TecTom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let them try, in the end, any such effort to cripple the net will only end in failure. My big question is why do we elect such dumbasses?

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
    1. Re:As if one country could withstand change by Kamerynn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, in fact it is much more democratic than most "occidental countries" it is somewhat of a centralized power system, but still people are ELECTED there evry 4 years. Also, I should mention that the state has no military forces, only police and security forces for internal security. What an ignorant post you made.

  7. Good luck... by tliet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    with trying to enforce that policy. Would iChat on Mac OS X (or any other voice/video chat program) be illegal as well?

    1. Re:Good luck... by iztaru · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends of the new law.

      In this moment is aready ilegal to use the ICE's data network for VoIP trafic because it competes with the ICE's voice network (ICE has a monopoly on voice trafic). However, the problem is not the personal use of it, the problem begins when you want to profit on it, because it would be unfair competence:

      1. You pay a personal connection to the internet.
      2. You set a business of international phone calls.
      3. You are using the ICE's network for something that is not allowed according your contract.

      The problem here is that the ICE is a monopoly and you cannot select any other ISP, but in normal conditions, any company is allow to stablish the conditions of use for its resources.

  8. Huh? by DarKry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Might as well throw people in jail for talking. hell lets ban all communication while we are at it. I mean heaven forbid I write a note to someone and hand it to them instead of letting a middle man make money off of it.

  9. Nationalised telephone company by igorthefiend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's the key to all this. They want it to be illegal because the state might lose money.

    1. Re:Nationalised telephone company by gowen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right, and it's *only* the telephone company proposing this. No one in the Costa Rican government is (as yet) onside.

      Can you say "Nothing to see here. Move Along"?

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Nationalised telephone company by juanfe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's changing. As a result of the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) negotiations, Costa Rica finally, after being asked to leave the room because they weren't playing ball and "this room is only for serious negotiations" (funny thing, a friend of mine was involved in the negotiations and had some choice things to say regarding that), finally came to and agreed to privatize, over time, two of its big national industries: insurance and telecom. [http://www.ustr.gov/assets/Document_Library/Repor ts_Publications/2004/2004_National_Trade_Estimate/ 2004_NTE_Report/asset_upload_file462_4745.pdf]

      To get internet access in Costa Rica, unless you were a scientific institution, you still have to go through the ICE, the state entity. They charge higher-than-US dialup prices for nowhere close to US-quality service (monthly access fees PLUS minutes of usage on your phone line). To get a cell phone you often must wait months and can only get it through them. Costa Rica's basic argument is that telecommunications is a right of people, that both the airwaves and the land through which phone lines travel are Costa Rican property and that they should be driven by social need rather than profit. Great in theory: in practice, apalling.

      Interestingly, this new proposed regulation can't really be very long-lived UNLESS they say that because they agreed to open up their network, internet and wireless lines (nothing said of Plain-ole-telephone service), they may be saying that this will compete with a public national service and undermine the goal of the state.

      I don't buy it.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
  10. Illegal in South Africa till Feb 05 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    VOIP was criminilized in South Africa since 1996. It was illegal to make any voip calls whatsoever, that means no MSN Chat, Skype etc.
    VOIP became legal on Feb 1005 only after the Telkom (national telco) regulator started to break up Telkom's monopoly.

    1. Re:Illegal in South Africa till Feb 05 by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's completely [tt]rue.

      This all dates back to the cold war and research done by various scientists and archeologists. Back in 1982, the world was taken by surprise when Soviet archeologists called a press conference and reported they had found a massive grid of copper wires buried under Russia that had been carbon dated back to 1500AD. The Soviets said this was clear evidence the telephone had been invented in Russia, and that Russians had been using a sophisticated telephone network five hundred years previous.

      American scientists did similar work and after a lot of research reported in a big press conference in 1983 that they found a large amount of buried fiber optic cable spanning the entire United States and linking to Western Europe. They carbon dated this back to 1200AD, making it clear evidence that the West had had a sophisticated packet-switching fiber-optic network 800 years previous.

      The South Africans, then under Apartheid and desperate to shore up its worsening image with the rest of the world, then undertook its own research. For four years, South African archeologists excavated, passing soil samples to the best of their scientists. Finally, in 1987, they excitedly called a press conference. After all this digging, they had found absolutely nothing, there were no cables - copper, fiber-optic, or otherwise - under the ground at all.

      Which could only mean one thing, their scientists reported breathlessly: back in 1005, South Africa had the best mobile telephone network the world had ever seen.

      (This has been a message from Give an Old Joke a Home. Every year, millions of old jokes go homeless, existing barely on recycled scraps from Dennis Miller and Drew Carey. If you liked this joke, consider making it your own.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  11. sadly enough... by ecalkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's easy: since the telephone co is owned/controlled by the state, voip is *stealing* from the state.

    similar to states that tax alcohol and it's a crime to bring (over a very limited qty) it into the state from other states.

    eric

    1. Re:sadly enough... by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      states that tax alcohol and it's a crime to bring (over a very limited qty) it into the state from other states.

      It's not a crime to bring over however much alcohol you like. You just have to pay the taxes. How do you think the CH_3CH_2OH made it into your state in the first place?

      I'm assuming here that your local law (US?) is not totally insane

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  12. Maybe the real reason? by tobybuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've not RTFA but from discussion I had with someone 'in the know' it may well come back to the country loosing a significant amount of income from the price they charge for inbound telephony. When you call CR part of the price you pay for the call goes to the CR government. This is vital foreign exchange a country such as theirs cann ill afford to lose.

    For a country that needs this income to build its hospitals, social infrastructure (yes and Army, corruption etc) it is a big blow.

    If this is the reason I can actually support this. Despite what seem like the majority of the Slashdot crowd think, there is more to life that getting 'free' services from the Internet.

    1. Re:Maybe the real reason? by jamesgray · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (yes and Army, corruption etc)

      Um, Costa Rica doesn't have an army. It's probably one of the least corrupt countries in Central America...
      Not that banning VoIP is good idea or anything - just be careful about what you say (especially when you have no idea what you're talking about ;)

    2. Re:Maybe the real reason? by thetejon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, Costa Rica does not actually have an army, and they are quite proud of this. What they do have is a stable democratic government and a literacy rate very close to that of the U.S.. It is true that they are poor compared to many nations and may have some slightly unorthodox ways of making money (For example, they charge a $26 exit tax when tourists leave the country - it goes towards maintaining the airport and such). But this is not a backwards country run by corrupt drug dealers or army generals. I don't know anything about the government's role in telephony there, so I will assume you're right about the income it receives. But I think you've been fed some misinformation about the general state of the country.

    3. Re:Maybe the real reason? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      I can appreciate where you are going with that, but as someone who has lived in Costa Rica for several years, and had to deal with all of it's communication monpolies and other government services, this is completely teh wrong way to look at it.

      That's NOT the reason they want to do it. The national phone company monopoly has been doing badly for years, they employee too many people, are a national make-work project, and are on the verge of being privatized. This is just one more death-cry from a dying company that NEEDS to die.

      I'm not against government-run communication services, when it serves a need... but at the moment, there is so much competition waiting to move into the country, it's not funny, and before you say "Oh but then prices will go up".. the government woiuld still be free to set the rules. Nobody says privatizing means deregulating.

      CR has no military, great tourism, and some greate exports. The reason it's economically bad is mainly due to corruption. The reason there are only a couple hundred thousand new cellular phone lines per year is because of people stuffing their pockets, holding up paperwork until they get paid off. It's not totally corrupt, totally evil corruption, but it's enough to make dealing with the government a real pain in the ass.

      There is no reason for the national ISP to offer such crappy, NAT-based, slow cable access. (their dialup is fine).

      I don't get how a country should stay in the stone-age to keep profits up. This won't make a hair of difference to profits.. those companies who use VOIP now will continue to use it, covertly, and those people at home will continue to use it at home.

  13. simpler solution by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if they have a monopoly, why not just block it at the first router?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  14. Belarus by totierne · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think someone was up on charges in Belarus, I think they got fined, maybe I should search slashdot for a reference...

    http://www.boingboing.net/2004/10/19/belarus_bus ts _americ.html

  15. Good idea by jbb999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should also make it a crime to talk to people without using a phone at all. After all you're just bypassing the phone companies systems by doing so which clearly should be a crime.

  16. Where do you draw the line? by FalconZero · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • What about if I record myself, and post it to the net, then someone downloads it, thats (literally)my VOICE over IP. Will they make that Illegal?
    • How about if I write some text and put a Text to Speech engine on my site with my voice loaded into the engine? Will they make that Illegal?
    • What about if Costa Rica telcos want to relay their voice calls internally over IP (at any point in the pathway) Will they make that Illegal?
    Maybe next they'll make all paketized transfer of voice data illegal? - BYE BYE GPRS. This is what happens when people make laws without consulting unbiased (or unbiased on average) techinal people.
    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Where do you draw the line? by Politburo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In keeping with tradition I did not RTFA. However, the article summary states "internet based phone calls," so I think your ludicrous situations where you looked at several literal, but unused, meanings of "voice over ip" are irrelevant. This is obviously a power grab by whatever telco companies/monopoly exists in Costa Rica. I'm not at all sure how you jumped to making "all packetized transfer of voice data illegal - BYE BYE GPRS."

      Furthermore, there is no such thing as unbiased. I believe that the 'unbiased technical people' you would have liked to have been consulted would actually have been biased towards unregulated VoIP. Just because you agree with them doesn't mean that they're unbiased.

  17. Egypt did it first by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually I'm very ashamed to say that if there's one thing we've led the world in, it is this one. It is currently illegal to provide VoIP services, because the telephone company is government owned and they make loads of money off international phone calls. Heard rumours that this may change sometime in the future though...

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
  18. About Costa Rica by qwasty · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, everyone seems to have some wrong ideas about what kind of country Costa Rica is, so here's a little info from someone who's actually lived there.

    CR is not communist, or poverty stricken. It is in fact the most stable and economically successful latin american country, yes, it beats Mexico and Brazil as well.

    Most Costa Ricans have cellphones, and DSL internet access either at home, a library, or in the neighborhood internet cafe.

    The country is democratic, and very pro-technology. Many US technology companies have moved there because of the pro-technology/pro-capitalism attitude of the government.

    The economy is very efficient, and it runs an American-style government on only a 13% tax base. What this means for the individuals who live there is that instead of two people in a family working 50+ hours a week to make a living, one person in a Costa Rican can make a living.

    Most Costa Ricans make about $12 per day. Doesn't sound like a lot, but since the public transportation is well designed, no one needs cars. Cars are still a status symbol, however, just like everywhere else. Costa Ricans can afford (with some saving) a car, a house, a cellphone, DSL at home, a vacation to the USA, and pretty much everything else that most people think of as common in a first world country, all on $12 per day.

    The country became a first world country only during the last 10 years, and although it's doing amazingly well, the job market is still catching up to the population size, especially in rural areas. The cities are where the jobs are. And most of the business owners are foreign, americans and europeans. More europeans than americans since americans for some reason don't understand what's going on around them.

    Americans go to Costa Rica mostly for prostitution, so the people they encounter like to encourage their notions so that it makes the Americans feel superior, and looser with their money.

    CR's economy is the fastest growing one in the america's. No small business owner I met had been in the country for more than 5 years, and every one of them had become millionaires (USD) in that time with their restaurants, hostels, construction companies, computer companies, etc.

    Things have changed a bit since I've been there, but instead of imagining marxist rebels with AK-47's, imagine people in business suits with laptops and briefcases.

    Any other questions, just ask.

    1. Re:About Costa Rica by prdallan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... , yes, it beats Mexico and Brazil as well

      Sorry, but I don't buy that. Now, really, could you post some data to support such claims?

      Mexico and Brazil may have lots of social problems - and maybe in this aspect it could be possible that Costa Rica had some better indexes. But as far as I have heard, it does not get even close when talking about GDP, market size, level of industrialization, native technology, universities, scientific work, just to name a few...

    2. Re:About Costa Rica by ndrtkr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are you talking about the same "Costa Rica" ? The one where I live?

      I wouldn't say CR is the most stable and economically successful latin american country...

      That's just hilarious. Maybe central american country; and still, that's not something we should feel proud of.

      Don't confuse the general situation of the country with the way people like to live. Sadly, we have adopted the american way of buy now, pay forever... But that doesn't mean everyone is wealthy...

      And to say something about the topic, what else can you expect from a government controlled company that owns the monopoly on telecommunications and technology? It is true that a lot of people have cellphones, but that's a status symbol, you should be here to see the AWFUL service we get, both on TDMA and GSM.

      Let alone talking about Costa Rica being pro-technology, that's just NOT true; only 6 months ago DLS started to be accessible and still the service is just below average.

      I read this news on local newspaper a few days ago and I just laughed. Ignorance is a bliss.

      --
      - live from Costa Rica !
    3. Re:About Costa Rica by thetejon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Okay, I agree with most of what you said, but do most Americans really go there for prostitution? What about the beaches and cloud forests, the laid back atmosphere, friendly locals, low cost of living? If Americans think that the only thing worthwhile in Costa Rica is prostitutes, there are some travel agents that need to be fired.

    4. Re:About Costa Rica by cybersaga · · Score: 3, Interesting

      runs an American-style government

      This is the only place I disagree with you. Costa Rica is hardly like the States, nor even supports it. When Bush went on about the Coalition of the Willing, Costa Rica asked that their name be removed. Costa Rica has no army. They concentrate on making their own country better without meddling in the affairs of other countries.

      The article states that the ICE is a monopoly, but that's how they keep things in check. In English, the ICE is the Costa Rican Institute of Electricity. They handle the electricity and telecommunications for the entire country.
      There is also only one, yes one, insurance company for every kind of insurance. Surely they have more examples too. Each are government regulated and do not rip people off.

      It is true though that most business owners are European or American. This is because no foreigners are allowed to work unless they open their own business. This is because, as was mentioned, there are still not enough jobs for the existing population, and they don't need warmth seeking westerners taking their jobs.

      I suspect this law will not be passed. Costa Ricans are smarter than that.

    5. Re:About Costa Rica by Politburo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The country became a first world country only during the last 10 years

      That's odd. The Cold War has been over for 10+ years.

      First, Second and Third world designations are NOT economic designations! They were used during the Cold War to describe the various alliances and blocs. The "First World" was the US/Western Europe and anyone allied with them. The "Second World" was USSR/East Europe and sometimes China. The "Third World" was everyone else. Since most poorer nations had their own problems to worry about, they did not get involved in the Cold War and were designated Third World countries. This led to the incorrect assumption that Third World = poor, First World = rich, and somewhere along the way Second World just got dropped.

    6. Re:About Costa Rica by amontiel · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is such an ignorant comment. I AM A COSTA RICAN citizen, and I worked there for Acer and Intel before moving to Europe. I know about the state of technological penetration in the country and what qwasty says here is just a bunch of uninformed facts. DSL at home??? Tell that to ALL of my friends there who have been trying for years to even get a decent ISDN connection at home. DSL is not even available to the general public yet. The so called "Advanced Internet" project has been delayed for 3 years now and it is not until last week, that the Costa Rican Institute of Electricity (ICE in Spanish) finished installing the routers to start selling DSL access at prices that are prohibitive to the general population. They will start offering a 128/64 Kbps line for $28/month and YES that is a 128/64Kbps line for that price. The Costa Rica you describe does not sound like the same place where I was born and raised and where I lived for 30 years of my life and which I visited again just recently. Efficient economy and public transportation? REALLY? Please tell me where did you travel in the country so I can move there. I won't even reply to the business ownership stupidity or to the prostitution bit. Now, about the reason for this move by the ICE. The only reason behind this is that Costa Rican telecommunications are a state monopoly (yes, a la MS) and what the ICE is trying to do is either define VoIP as a value-added service and regulate it or have it declared illegal. If you are going to post half-assed information, at least try to be objective about it. For those who can read Spanish, here is an article from La Nacion Costa Rica's largest newspaper, describing the situation. Basically, all they are afraid of is losing the profit from international phone calls, and because all telecommunications use public infrastructure, they would like to be able to regulate it or control it completely. Anyway, please do some research or reading before you post such crap. Better yet, take a plane and go to Costa Rica for real. It might enlighten you a bit.

    7. Re:About Costa Rica by qwasty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not ignorant, but I'm not costa rican either, so maybe I seem ignorant to you, who is a costa rican...

      When I had DSL in CR, I got it from Racsa in San Jose, the capital city. It's not fast DSL, but DSL it is. I had a friend of mine get DSL in her home so she could better communicate with other international parts of our company, and it seemed that Racsa is more inclined to get things done if you mention it's for business. The price was high by costa rican standards, but not unaffordable by individuals. Now, she usually gets her internet access from cafe's, not at home. Internet access is easily available to anyone in San Jose, if not at home, then at a cafe.

      Maybe my definition of efficient public transportation is different from most people's. It's convenient, cheap, and gets you where you want to go fast. In the USA, it's expensive (comparatively speaking), only serves some areas, and it's SLOW, with wait times at some bus stops measured in hours.

      When I say the economy is efficient, I compare my American lifestyle and it's cost, with a costa rican lifestyle and it's cost. The lifestyles aren't that different in the cities, but the Costa Ricans can do it on $12 per day, in a 40 hour work week. And their government only costs them 13% (oversimplification, but that's the gist of it).

      If you disagree with the business ownership bit, and the prostitution bit, well fine. I'm only repeating my experiences (yes, actually in Costa Rica), I'm sure yours are different. One thing I did notice, that I didn't mention, is that Costa Ricans deeply resent the social problems foreigners have brought to Costa Rica. Very few Costa Ricans are at the top of CR's business boom, like so many foreigners are. They typically end up pushing around a mop instead. I'd be resentful too. Not saying you are, but it sounds like it.

    8. Re:About Costa Rica by Politburo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, third world is effectively now an economic designation, and no longer has anything to do with the cold war.

      Yes, but the original post said (paraphrased) "Costa Rica has only been a first world country for 10 years". I guess my problem isn't so much that Third world = poor to most people, but that people have taken the First/Second/Third trichotomy (is that a word?) and forced a rich/poor dichotomy on top of it. If first = rich and third = poor.. where did second go? It just doesn't make sense, and really, it's stupid PC crap. If we all have in our heads that third world = poor, just fucking say poor.

    9. Re:About Costa Rica by amontiel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I simply cannot believe that a self-proclaimed "non-ignorant" would willingly make these statements and claims. Either you are trolling or having fun here, I don't know which. Racsa DOES NOT offer DSL yet to the general public. They ran, or wanted to run, a pilot project a while back to test it. I know this because a relative of mine works at ICE and told me this. The article from La Nacion says, at the bottom of the page that: "The exminister of Science and Technology (2000-2002) Guy de Theramond, one of the main pioneers (of the Advanced Internet Project) said yesterday that he is pleased with the work done at the heart of the network and that 'we only have to wait for DSL'". So I really do not know how you managed to get it from RACSA when they are still waiting for it. What you may be talking about is cable access provided by Amnet, which is a totally different thing. Maybe you got your facts wrong there. About your economic facts, $12 a day equals $240 a month which, according to today's exchange rate is 111825,60 Costa Rican colones, not counting social security deductions and the like. I find it hard to believe that people can "make" it back home with that, but then again, it depends on what you define by "making" it. It seems to me from your original message, that making it for you means affording vacations to the US, buying a home and a car and other similar luxuries. I find it extremely hard to believe that; given for example that my brother who is an attorney and makes much more than $12/day has to think twice about it before paying for things you claim people do there on a regular basis, such as taking vacations to the US, or buying cars or carrying laptops and cellphones. I actually met people who carried toy cellphones just to look as if they had one, but I disgress here.... I know of people who make over 1 million Costa Rican colones a month (roughly $3000) and only go with their families to the US once or at most twice a year. Now talk about doing that with only $240 a month. I do not resent your comments, I just find it annoying that you post factoids and generalize them to apply them to a reality which is alien to you, but then again, that is a typical american attitude. Can't blame you for that. Oh, and about the mopping thing, I've seen that done to american citizens in the US as well by their fellow americans, so I do not know who should be more resentful.

    10. Re:About Costa Rica by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Let me preface this by saying I was recently on a 3-week vacation in Costa Rica where I got to see a lot of the country.

      Most Costa Ricans have cellphones, and DSL internet access either at home, a library, or in the neighborhood internet cafe.
      You are smoking crack. I saw very few cellphones in this country -- even in San Jose (the most metropolitain city I visited). Internet in the home is way over the pay scale of most Costa Ricans. In San Jose, broadband does exist, but you pay for it. In most other cities, its basically at dial-up speeds, and internet cafes are the only way anyone could afford to access the internet at all.

      The economy is very efficient, and it runs an American-style government on only a 13% tax base. What this means for the individuals who live there is that instead of two people in a family working 50+ hours a week to make a living, one person in a Costa Rican can make a living.
      I didn't get a real sense for the domestic working schedules of people in Costa Rica, but in San Jose, we were renting a room from a cottage run exclusively by women. The economy in Costa Rica is majorly subsidized by Intel which has a very large plant down there, and the whole "Eco-tourism" craze. Us stupid foreigners pay $2000 a pop to go watch common every day animals climb up what to us look like exotic palm trees and what they consider house plants. Other than that, Del Monte and Dole have basically split the country into halves and are selling fruits from the plentiful fertile soil that Costa Rica has. Oh yeah, and they sell some coffee there too.

      Most Costa Ricans make about $12 per day.
      Uhh ... this varies quite a *lot*. There's no way in hell people in San Jose only make $12 a day. Its less than americans, but it aint no $12. Cab/Bus rides, food, trinkets, hotels, etc -- in San Jose, they are probably at about 50% of american salaries.

      In other inland cities like MonteVerde, of course, things are very different and you very well might be correct. We were in a really nice hotel that cost us like $15 per person.

      But the Costal cities which are so heavily subsidized by tourism, these guys are not living on the cheap; that's for sure (these are $100 rooms, $20 meals, etc).

      Doesn't sound like a lot, but since the public transportation is well designed, no one needs cars.
      This is nonsense. In San Jose, people had cars just as much as americans do -- and the jaywalking ettiquette is quite different. :) In other cities this varied, but the only real limiting factor in car ownership, that I noticed, was whether or not the city had paved roads.

      a vacation to the USA,
      Perhaps for the more well to do Costa Ricans, but I don't see what possible motivation any Costa Rican would have for visiting the US. We've got crappy food, useless beaches, the most horrendously egotistical tourist attractions, and we wouldn't even *try* to speak spanish to give them directions.

      Americans go to Costa Rica mostly for prostitution, so the people they encounter like to encourage their notions so that it makes the Americans feel superior, and looser with their money.
      Uhh ... not *THIS* american! Costa Rica is a major tourist country even without the "eco-tourism". They've got beaches on BOTH oceans. Some are very suitable great surfing. The number of tours you can go to are practically uncountable -- the amount of wildlife, both plant and animals I saw in such a short amount of time was probably more than I've ever seen in my life. In an open air restaurant, we saw a sloth climbing up a tree that wasn't even part of any tour!

      There was a warning at the airport about child prostitution, but that's all I noticed. There certainly didn't seem to be a lot of open rampant prostitution, but maybe we just didn't go to the right places.

      Dude, I think your view of Costa Rica is extremely skewed. This is obvious from the fact that you don't even recognize just how varied the country is.
  19. true enough, but by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i live in kentucky. more than a fair amount of drinking alcohol is fermented, brewed, and/or distilled here.

    eric

  20. Already the case here. by Minupla · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Antigua it's already illegal. Cable and Wireless pushed through a law making it illegal. When you sign up for ISP service, you have to agree not to do it, along with the usual AUP.

    Min

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    1. Re:Already the case here. by Jason+H.+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same situation in Thailand.

  21. Just Politics by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's probably nothing to get excited about here. The Costa Ricans aren't any stupider than anyone else in the world. The local phone monopoly just wants to get some attention, which will set the stage for whatever deal finally comes out of the governing process. Very likely VoIP won't be criminalized in Costa Rica. It will probably have fees attached to it. The only question will be how much these fees are likely to be. I would guess they will be high enough to protect the phone monopoly. Just the usual politics...

  22. Costa Rica? by sdo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It would be a shame if this sets a precedent

    It's Costa Rica for crying out loud. They're not capable of setting a global economic precedent except for maybe the price of coffee.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  23. And in the US, it's municipal Wi-Fi by Silwenae · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only difference between this and what's going on in the US, is in this case, it's a state-controlled monopoly and in the US it's the few remaining Baby Bells doing the same with trying to ban municipal wi-fi.

    Unfortunately, it's all about the telecom industry, both in the US, and abroad, trying to consolidate power, and shut out open access, whether it's data or voice.

  24. Costa Rica has Internet back? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A few years ago, they allowed lots of spammers to off-shore there. Since all their Internet access is via the national monopoly, it wasn't hard to just block them at the router to fix the problem. The problem of the people being spammed, that is. It left the non-spammers in Costa Rica high and dry since there was no reasonable ISP that they could move their business to.

    You'd think they'd have learned something from that about monopolies.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  25. Re:Horray for capitalism! by skadus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering as how it's a state-run telecom, I don't really see where your sarcasm is going. :p

    I mean, isn't a state-run anything more socialist than capitalist, despite the fact that it's still working for money?

  26. Brother-in-law Political System by iammrjvo · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I've been to Costa Rica four or five times to visit friends. When I was there on my honeymoon fives years back, there were big protests because the government was about to hand the phone system over to the president's brother-in-law - or something like that.

    At any rate, the Costa Rican political system tends to be pretty corrupt in the sense that those in power tend to give big favors to their friends in family. I'll bet something like this is going on.

    --
    Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    1. Re:Brother-in-law Political System by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the government was about to hand the phone system over to the president's brother-in-law

      We're talking about the phone system in this very article. Do you see any connection...? Hmm...

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  27. Not just a crime... by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but a look at the future. If you are a member
    of the WTO and have small/fledgling national
    industries to protect from unplanned for (and
    unregulated) competition, you make it illegal.

    You might say that Costa Rica has adopted the
    very same measures that the USA's "**AA" have
    implimented in the face of new media distribution
    modes, and similar tactics that the big regional
    USA phone companies have adopted (with big
    government help) to protect them from government/
    community WiFi competition.

    That being said, it seems a shame that a democracy
    with a constiuentcy that has a 98% literacy rate
    should find the need to penalize its citizens for
    the sake of a corporate (nationalized?) entity.
    These are the kinds of tactics that a government
    with a much lower literacy rate (65%), and can
    influence its citizens with massive propaganda
    campaigns would be expected to use - like the USA.

    1. Re:Not just a crime... by niiler · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There is an interesting confluence of things going on, it seems. Costa Rica has suceeded as a nation largely because it has not privatized many services. Privatization of services in central and south American countries has often led to rampant inflation and in some caused the fall of the middle class in the case of Argentina or led to water shortages as in Bolivia. Contrary to what is preached in the U.S. about government regulation, many people actually seem to benefit from it.

      What seems to be happening is that one of the Costa Rican government's cash cows, the internet (and communications, in general) seems to be threatened by this. As such, they are concerned that they won't have the budget to provide the services they currently do. Of course, I have no way of knowing specifically what their budgetary constraints are.

      Personally, I think the banning of VoIP would be a bad thing considering the usual ethics of Costa Rica. (For example, they don't maintain a standing army). But I'm going to wait to hear from Willy Smith (hey Willy!), at the Linux Gazette since he lives there and probably has a much more informed opinion than myself.

  28. Vonage over SSH? by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it possible? Obviously you'd have to avoid trying to get a Costa Rica local number, but for someone with relatives in a foreign country, would this be a plausible solution?

  29. What will this mean for Phil Hughes? by Nate+B. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The owner/publisher of Linux Journal moved to Costa Rica some years back and hasn't been subtle for his reasons, namely the DMCA. Now in an ironic twist, the paradise he moved to is considering making VOIP illegal, a technology I'd bet he uses. I'd look for Phil to lead the charge against this one.

    --

    "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  30. Kinda like... by gorbachev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...when phone and cable companies in US are trying to make municipal broadband development. While they're quite as brazen as their Costa Rican brothers, they certainly are trying just as hard.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  31. Costa Rica has always had an army by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Costa Rica has always had an army. However, it is very small an unobtrusive compared that of other countries in the area. They don't even call it an army, but it is one anyway. Costa Rica was colonized differently, compared to the other countries in the area: more by settlers looking to build a home rather than plantationers. This made it somewhat more civil than the other places. As for imperialism, during the Soviet proxy wars against Central America during the 1970s and 1980s, the Soviets even created a rebel army to attack Costa Rica. It gained little ground, however.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Costa Rica has always had an army by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

      National Armed Hackey-Sack Squadron

    2. Re:Costa Rica has always had an army by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed; however, your mall security guards could probably take over the country, if your civilian security forces weren't armed with rocket propelled grenades and the like ;) I was down there in 2002 (beautiful, beautiful country, with wonderful people - I fell in love with it in a week, and cried when I had to leave :) ), staying with a family in Ciudad Colon while working on Radio Paz Internacional (which is now closed, unfortunately :P). I had never seen a mall security guard armed with a military-style assault rifle before ;)

      James, the head of RFPI (the radio station), had received death threats from several American right wing anti-government groups after the Oklahoma City bombing. He had long monitored the short wave broadcasts of groups like this (not just in the US, but internationally), and after the bombing was suddenly one of the only experts on the subject, so every other newspaper and TV station had to interview him (despite normally cool relations with the US government, he was quite proud of how Clinton, in one sentence of a speech, made a reference to what he had reported).

      One day he got back to the station, and these two guys dressed in all black (he said they were almost like ninja outfits) were standing there waiting. He asked them who they were, they showed some identification, and said that they were from the office of the vice president, and that they had received a credible threat on his life. He invited them in, but they refused, stating that there were more people coming. eventually there were 8 people there, and they had unloaded several large crates. They took them up to the second floor of the station (which has a beautiful all-glass wall around 3/4 of the building, with a great view down the mountainside), and started unpacking. There were machine guns, RPGs, all sorts of things; they turned Radio For Peace into one of the most fortified places in the country - quite the irony, really.

      After a couple weeks, they packed up and left. A few months later, James was heading back from a transmitter shed, when he heard a strange metallic "Ping!" from the shed. He didn't think much of it and kept on walking. Partway between the shed and the station is a concrete block; he heard another "Ping!" from it that sounded different, and noticed powdered concrete rising up. He turned around and saw down the road two men on motorcycles aiming at him. He threw himself down behind the block. Either realizing that they were spotted or thinking that they got him, they drove off.

      But yeah, back to the original subject... kudos to all of you down there for shunning a military. Your >60 years of peace is probably the main reason why your country is so well off in comparison to your neighbors. And I really hope to be able to visit again some time. :)

      --
      Don't take a knife to a gunfight, or even a knife to a knife fight. Take a gun to a knife fight.
  32. Improvements to South African phone system by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Which could only mean one thing, their scientists reported breathlessly: back in 1005, South Africa had the best mobile telephone network the world had ever seen"

    The South African system was made all the more robust by improvements that were forced on them just a few years before this by Y1K compliance.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  33. Words of a Costa Rica citizen by rquesada · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was born in Costa Rica and live there (here, indeed) since then... The problem in general is this, there is a big company called the Costarican Electricity Institute (ICE in spanish), it is run by the government and some of their achievments is that thanks to their founders, this was the sencond country in the world with electricity (One-two years later of New York's street lamps innaguration).

    That company holds all the permissions to grant electricity, phone and internet access, and in fact, one of the biggest income is that of telephony, especially international calls.

    What they are seeking is to be the only provider of VoIP, not to make it illegal at all, but provide the service and ban or send to jail any company that tries to use internet to send voice packets without a contrat with them, in that case even using Skype can cost you a few days at a prison, the only way to use VoIP is to ask them for a service, yet unavailable, and who knows for how long.

    The same has happened with what they call "Advanced Internet" (Basically, ADSL access), they have some sort of pilot program with a few thousan d connections, but the real service will start later this year, whereas in other contries I had seen that optic fiber is beign installed around...

    As a summary, we are giving one step ahead and two back in every bureocratic decision, mostly thanks to our government corruption (Heck, we have two former presidents in jail... and precisely for corruption among cellular phone providers contracts and "awards" upon their selection).

    The situation is not as nice as the other big comment about Costa Rica, yes, we have not had any civil war or battle with our next countries in about fifty seven years, but there's a lot of delinquence, our streets suck (No more than a hundred meters without a volcanic crater in middle of the street).

    But in the pretty hand, we are becoming a sort of "Sillicon Tropical Rainforest", there is an Intel facility at a few minutes from my home, Sun is planning to come here, and there's a lot of other companies that open operation centers around, yes, Microsoft is one of them, and recently donated a full equipped lab to my college, ITCR, before that, the ITCR was a loyal FOSS advocate... :'(

    Also there are a lot of natural and beatiful places from beaches to volcanoes, and rain forests in between, we have no army (Remember "Fahrenheit 9/11"?), and the most important thing for the 99% of the population is to have a nice ringtone and that the Costa Rica soccer team get to the World Cup... So, it's very easy for an outsider with great ideas to come here, build a business and get profit as almost no "tico" (As we call ourselves) want to complicate it's live so much just to get a fancy phone... So good luck foreign investors, and you are welcome!!!

  34. Telkom - yes!!! by sapped · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good old Telkom has already declared this illegal in south Africa.

    For those of you that don't know the situation; Telkom is the only landline provider in South Africa, but also handily makes the rules deciding who can do what with any telecommunication business. Neat huh?

  35. OK, I'm Costa Rican, Here's the Deal: by CharAznable · · Score: 2, Informative
    First of all, let's clear some things:
    • Costa Rica has no army, just a police force and border guard.
    • There is no death penalty. Drunk drivers don't get shot, just gang-raped in jail by other inmates.
    • There is one telco, called ICE, and it's a state monopoly.
    • Said telco offers excellent local phone service and cheap cellular lines, but incredibly crappy internet access. At least they have DSL and cable, but all my dad can get is 512k down, 128k up.

    So what's happening is that there is a constitutionally mandated monopoly on telecommunications. What's happening that a bunch of old farts, the kind that have no fucking clue and are holding the country back, are figuring that VoiP would technically be in violation of said monopoly.
    To be honest, it's amazing that there is such a big software industry in Costa Rica, considering that internet access is so crappy and regulated. A lot of people are trying to challenge the ICE monopoly, but it's hard going against the old guard. That's what Costa Rican nerds have to put up with.
    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
  36. I live here and there is 1 telco by dindi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ICE is the name of the only telco in Costa Rica.
    They provide internet, phone landline and cell.

    Just to give an idea, GSM network just ran out of free lines, waiting period for a landline in suburban (not off the grid) areas is 6+ months.

    I am renting an office to have net, because at my place there is no landline, nor 2-way cable (so you need a modem with dial up and cable, the latter DL the phone for upstream comms)

    Back to the topic: Costa Rica has ONLINE casinos, sportsbooks, bingo halls, and they ALL use VOIP.
    Call centers use VOIP.
    If you make an emergency call int he states and do not speek english, there is a chance, that the call is directed here to a translator OVER VOIP.

    I use VOIP to talk to good ol' europe, since the minute rate is $1 + to e.g. Hungary, and almost 2$ the other way.

    ICE people do not like to work. They like to strike, and every time they mention privatizing the company, they go to the street and there is no service (there is phone, but no customer service, so if a line breaks or whatever pain you have, you are fsckd)

    Well but hey, there is no snowstorms here, just occasional quakes ...

    Ahm why they won't put it thru? The casino industry gives 1000s of jobs to students, so do other companyes who USE VOIP.

    I am not worried ... on the other hand: I just tunnel it to my server on an unusual port as it was streaming whatever, and they can come and look really close and still see nothing :)

  37. Re:reasons americans go to costa rica by thetejon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess I didn't spend enough time in San Jose. If you really want Americans in Costa Rica, try Playa Tamarindo in Guanacaste. There are plenty there surfing and drinking.

  38. wrong by glMatrixMode · · Score: 3, Interesting

    no that's wrong. The expression "Third world" is a translation of the french "tiers monde", which is a reference to the "tiers état", litteraly "third state", which used to designate unprivileged people in the kingdom of France, until the 18th century (by contrast with the nobles and the members of the Church).

    The expression "tiers monde" dates back to 1952, and has been forged by demographer Alfred Sauvy, to designate poor countries, implying that the "tiers monde" is being despised and exploited just as the "tiers état" used to be.

    See :
    http://www.linternaute.com/histoire/motcle/2923/a/ 1/1/tiers-monde.shtml

    --
    War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
    1. Re:wrong by glMatrixMode · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In French, using "tiers monde" to designate non-poor countries is unthinkable, as the word "tiers" strongly suggests poverty, because of the expression "tiers état". So "tiers monde" will probably always denote poor countries.

      But of course no one said that the English expression "third world" will always have the same meaning : the meaning of expressions evolves with time.

      If you're right, then the couple "third world"/"tiers monde" should be added to the list of false cognates, like
      actual/actuel (=present)
      journey/journée (=day)

      --
      War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
  39. Funny telcos (and not just the states ones) by Pac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Telefonica (the Spanish group who also owns Terra, some banks and more) is probably yhe largest Brazilian phone company nowadays. They also own the most popular broadband service, Speedy. Until last year their service contract stated you couldn't use VoIP because "it consumed too much band".

  40. Not a crime; just a badly written article by jfengel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The entire discussion on Slashdot has centered around a substantial misreading of the article.

    The real point of the article is that the Costa Rican national telephone company wants VOIP regulated as a service, like the other phone lines are. We are having the same debate in the United States. The phone company here was originally designed as a monopoly, and universal service meant subsidies. Find a way around the monopoly, and there's no way to fund the subsidies. So you either regulate it enough to collect taxes or do away with the phone service in rural areas (which is often the basis of internet service in those areas as well.)

    Costa Rica has similar regulatory issues. So they're in the phase of "Hey, this ought to be regulated." The regulations are completely undefined as yet, so some reporter speculates that they could in some ludicrous limit case result in criminalizing VOIP and then mentions it in the headline, the lead line, and then precisely once in the actual body of the article.

    Whereupon Slashdot copies the headline, and focuses the summary on it. Read into the rest of the article and you might find that most of the time when the Slashdot response to an article is "How could anybody be so incredibly stupid?" the answer is usually, "They're not, they've just been taken out of context."

    It may well be that any regulation of VOIP is a bad idea, that the Internet wants to be free, and if it outcompetes the old regime then we'll have to come up with a new plan. In Costa Rica's case, if they lose too much tax money from POTS to VOIP, they'll have to raise taxes elsewhere. Perhaps they'd raise a sales tax or income tax. But talk of criminalizing VOIP strikes me as a hysterical response to a subject that requires actual thought.

    1. Re:Not a crime; just a badly written article by dotgain · · Score: 2, Funny
      Here everyone was, flinging shit on the Bush administration, talking about the military, governement assisted monopolies and corruption, and you come along, with your right-click->open in new tab "Why I read the f__ing article.

      Well I hope you're happy. Do you think, if I wanted the facts, and headlines that were vaguely related to the article, I'd be on slashdot!?!

      You should have your UID taken away. Everyone was enjoying themselves until you came along.

  41. Oceanliner Companies Attempting to Outlaw Aircraft by srobert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine taking this approach 100 years ago. Oceanliners would push for legislation outlawing transoceanic aircraft. Horse trainers would push to abolish internal combustion engines. Theatrical companies would go after movie theaters. And the parcel services would try to eliminate telegraphs.

  42. Re:Not only GPRS by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    digital != packet based. GSM is circuit switched. GPRS is run over GSM however.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  43. Re:Look before you leap by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Informative
    "In Latin America in general the lesson on geography is North America (canada, US and mexico) Central America (guatemala down to panama) South America (from panama border all the way down)"

    The problem with that is confusion. It is fine to call a region Central America, as there is not already something with that name. However, there have been continents named North America and South America for a very long time (even before "Central America" was distinguished). Why call a region North America when this region is a mere subset of the continent that already has this name?

    There is a region named used which is "Anglo America" which could be used for US and Canada, but as you can see it leaves out Mexico.

    "has dissapeared I am glad I got rid of my school books, apparently they are all "wrong" now"

    They were indeed wrong if the mistakenly included the region of Central America as a distinct continent. The word continent means something, and having a "distintive history" is not part of it. This is why Europe, more and more, is considered to be part of the continent of Eurasia.

    Where do we find such a map that has CA as its own continent? Something that world geographers ignore? Do Iberians (Spain and Portugal) also have odd textbooks that make Iberia a separate continent even though no-one else recognizes it as such?

    "I am a NORTH American..........next time I travel to the US I will say that to the INS agent and see what he says about that"

    Go to images.google.com and find one of the many maps which shows what the continents are, and print it out. Flap it in his face. If he insists that you are not from North America, he is probably one of those dumb "United Statesians" who thinks that New Mexico is a separate country from the USA.

    Here is yet another nice map of continents.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.