Slashdot Mirror


GlobalFlyer Completes Record-Breaking Flight

ikewillis writes "Steve Fossett has successfully landed the GlobalFlyer in Kansas, completing the record-breaking flight and becoming the first person to successfully circle the earth in a nonstop solo flight. The journey of 37,000 kilometres has taken 67 hours, many of them fraught with anxiety over whether the custom-made GlobalFlyer aircraft had enough fuel for the trip. Fossett managed to touch down at 2:48 p.m. EST, to the delight of mission control staff, a small crowd and a marching band that had gathered at the airstrip to welcome him."

24 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. 67 hours no? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The friendly article mentioned "The journey of 37,000 kilometres took 67 hours".

    What is unknown is the amount of fuel left when the craft was landed, I'm sure I'm not the only one eager to find out.

    1. Re:67 hours no? by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is unknown is the amount of fuel left when the craft was landed

      One would have to presume that they calculated the necessary amount of fuel beforehand to achieve the lightest flight weight possible. It seems inconceivable that they really lost 2,600 lbs of fuel and still completed the journey fine.

      I see three possibilities.

      -The whole "loss of fuel" thing was a huge publicity stunt that worked wonderfully. Oooh, the anxiety!

      -Their inflight measurements were wrong.

      -They REALLY overfilled it, and had plenty to slop around.

    2. Re:67 hours no? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, it'll be interesting to see if it was jsut an instrument error, evaporation, or whatever else.

      Or if it was just hype to add some drama to the flight and keep it at the top of the headlines. Wouldn't be the first time for an artificial crisis.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:67 hours no? by idontgno · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes. Boost the sailplane to an altitude of 250 km and a Earth-relative velocity of 8 km/sec and the sailplane circumnavigates the Earth with NO further propulsion. FOREVER.

      I don't know why you'd want to orbit your sailplane, though....

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:67 hours no? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Some gliders have 30:1 or higher glide ratios. I doubt that the global flyer has a 20:1 glide ratio.

      Since the global flyer looks just like a glider with a jet engine bolted on, I wouldn't doubt it all that much.

  2. Blah by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The only difference between Steve Fosset and myself is millions upon millions of dollars. People like him just buy records.

    1. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only difference between Steve Fosset and myself is millions upon millions of dollars.

      Yeah, that and talent, vision, courage, ability, funding, support, drive, goals, and...well...a record.

      But don't worry, trolling on /. is just as honorable.

    2. Re:Blah by raider_red · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And people like you just sit around and bitch about it.

      Get off your butt and do something creative or new. Then maybe you'll be able to buy a couple.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    3. Re:Blah by dwlovell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Time is worth more than money. The fact that he spent his own personal time and money to make this happen is a testament to the courage and vision and talent.

      When Universities spend government grant money to do stuff like this, people fall all over themselves to congratulate them. Some guy spends his own money and years of his life to do the same, and suddenly he is some "rich fuck" in your eyes.

      It is obvious that your problem is that you are insecure about your own lack of funds and this is preventing you from congratulating someone who deserves accolades for their hard work. This wasn't some fly-by-night (no pun intended) attempt. This guy has been trying for many years with multiple prototypes and failed attempts. He didn't give up, regardless of how expensive it was.

      Get over the fact that you are not rich and see the value that his research brings to the world. (the same value you would see if this was a government funded research project).

      -David

  3. Mod me down but this is no big accomplishment by zymano · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A millionaire with all the time on his hands.

    This reminds me of Richard Bransons attempts to get media attention by crossing the atlantic in his high speed yacht to break some old records.

    Flying around the world without refueling is not a big accomplishment in my opinion.

    This was just for publicity for another rich guy.

    1. Re:Mod me down but this is no big accomplishment by Grip3n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obviously this man has a lot of opportunity in his life. He has obtained enough wealth to do whatever he so chooses, and rather than living a shallow quiet life of no regard, he has chosen to live life to its fullest.

      He has decided to break records, to participate in the production of a machine which would allow a human to do something no other human has done before. He has chosen to make history not just as a man with money, but a man with money who decided to live the adventure.

      Contrast this with the opposite: gather money, buy, sell, rinse and repeat until you die. Is that what you would have rather seen? Would you have congratulated this man on living a life worth living having done that? I doubt it. This man hasn't do that - he has decided to do something more.

      The Richard Bransons in this world are men who have opportunity and take it. They live their lives to a degree that we cannot because of our financial situation. They could easily, EASILY decide to lay back and do nothing at all. These men do not do that, rather they willingly decide to pioneer, to carve a path for the rest of humanity. Whether it is creating extremely efficient aircraft, going into space or more, they are living their lives to its fullest potential.

      Remember: All men die, few men really live.

      --
      To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  4. Re:Sad, isn't it? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, he decided to land in freakin' Kansas. They don't have many people out there, feewer people who give a rat's ass.

    If he would have landed in Chicago, NYC, or any number of other places, he would have had a huge crowd.

  5. Bigger deal for Burt Rutan by ShamanDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We can debate whether Fosset deserves praise, but I think it's pretty clear that it's a huge accomplishment for Burt Rutan.

    1. Re:Bigger deal for Burt Rutan by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We can debate whether Fosset deserves praise, but I think it's pretty clear that it's a huge accomplishment for Burt Rutan.

      Slight edit from me:

      We can debate whether Fosset deserves praise, but I think it's pretty clear that it's another huge accomplishment for Burt Rutan.

  6. an average of 343 MPH is well within reason by baine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    343 MPH is a reasonable speed once wind correction is taken into account. Remember that where he spent most of his time flying, steady winds in excess of 100 mph are not uncommon.

    Although none of the articles specify, I'd guess that the 285 MPH mark is either an IAS (indicated air speed - how fast the plane is going as indicated to the pilot) or more likely TAS (true air speed - how fast the plane is moving through the surrounding air). Ground air speed takes factors like wind into account, and can either be slower (in the event of a headwind) or faster (when tail winds are present) than the TAS.

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
  7. Why the hype? by Macrobat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This really seems to be overhyped to me. It is, at most, an incremental improvement over the status quo. Lindberg crossing the Atlantic was significant because nothing like it had ever been done; but we first orbited the Earth back in the '60s, military aircraft circle the globe in flight constantly, and there has never really been a commercial need for a plane that could go more than halfway around the world at one time. So, yeah, congratulations and all, but this sounds more like a millionaire sailing around the world in his yacht than the next Magellan.

    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  8. Re:That's Awesome...but... by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Right. Just like we replaced all of our satellites with balloons once he proved a human can circle the Earth in a balloon.

    Idiot.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  9. Fly Fly what is Fly by SuperTrozTX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rich guy stays up for 67 hours, while another rich guy's toy works around him.

    Hoo..... ray.

    This is as blah as can be.
    If I was a rich man...

  10. and one willing to risk his life at it too by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many of his adventures have a big chance in ending in a lethal failure. Yeah he has money, but he is living the dreams of many who do not and inspiring some of them to try to put themselves in the same position.

    Losers rarely want to do what winners have to do.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  11. Sheesh facts please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yuri Gagarin Did not Completely orbit hte globe...i.e. he did not Land where he took off and did completely orbit the Earth.

    He was the First Human into space and thats enough prestige for anyone.

    John Glenn completely orbited the Earth 3 times.

    Fosset did something interesting but not earth shattering. If he gets to Mars first...THEN i will give due Credit.

  12. Re:I feel...nothing by Kalgash · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Nope. You're just dead inside. Like so many others you have been anihalated by the constant barage of daily 'life changing' events. You now find it almost impossible to get excited about something whose relative excitement level (by your standards) ranks up there with finding out the current terrorist threat level has been upped once again.

    As a result (and to protect your mental faculties) your capacity for true joy has been severely curtailed. Don't worry. There are many like you out there. Jaded, bored and drowning in ennui. The rest of us allow ourselves the opportunatity to be hurt and perhaps even overloaded. As a result we feel real joy when others accomplish great things.

    I don't really know if your type is more prevalant than my type and frankly I think the answer would probably depress the fuck out of me.

    Try to find your wonderment. In your capacity for humanity. For our ability to push boundries and reach for the unknown. For the very real way that despite all of the dangers we pose to ourselves we have so far avoided utter distruction.

    Unless you are willing to risk disappointment you will never know true joy.

  13. Re:I feel...nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Give me a break, Mr. "holier-than-thou".

    This record wasn't worth getting excited about, simply because it wasn't much of an accomplishment.

    You will find that those you consider jaded, cynical and world weary just have a lot more experience in what actually goes on in this world. It's the ignorant and misinformed who get most excited about things.

    I remember the recent hoax about the cactus "growing human hairs". As a biochemist, I looked at the page of methods, laughed a little (since they had ripped it verbatim from another art/genetics project, and that had borrowed it from some standard protocol), and moved on.

    Others seemed to get very, very excited.

    Now, according to you, I am dead inside.

    I object: It is just that the excited ones (yourself included for this achievement), seem to be dead upstairs. Learn to think critically; look at what was actually achieved vs. the hype they're pushing.

    You too may realise it just isn't a big deal. Rich boys with rich toys. Other millionaires sponsor a yacht in the America's Cup - Fossett just paid to be a tourist in a largely computer-controlled flight of a plane. Whoopee.

  14. Re:I feel...nothing by luchaugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think, my frustration stems more from a feeling of , "if you have the cash, you can do cool shit. therefore, it's not cool to do shit just because you have mad cash". I LOVED Rick Hansen when he wheeled himself around the world, but Steve Fosset? Please. Gimme a strong pot o' coffee and his resources and I'll complete that flight, too (and I wouldn't expect the world to throw me a party).

  15. Re:I feel...nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, we're just dead inside to "a new world record!". If you watch enough news, there are world records being broken every day. Surely you can't be suggesting that I should be getting excited (and experiencing "true joy") all day every day.

    We do not shield ourselves from life to prevent from being "hurt". We shield ourselves from 4 billion daily news events so we can get something done. If I felt "true joy" about every time everybody did something neat, I'd have no time left to breathe. I assure you that even those of us who think this event is ho-hum still feel pain; it's simply about things that matter.

    I know what joy is; hearing about a millionare who went a bit further in a balloon than has been done before doesn't do it for me. This does not mean I'm "dead inside". (If my grandmother doesn't get excited by a new Linux kernel release, does that mean she's dead inside? No, she simply doesn't get excited by the same type of events.)

    Please try not to hold everybody else in the world in such contempt.