Slashdot Mirror


Fragging on Linux and TransGaming

Kez writes "HEXUS.net has an article looking at the current state of Linux gaming and the broad number of supported games both natively and through emulation. Included in the article is a chat with the Product Manager of TransGaming - the creators of Cedega (formerly known as WineX.)" From the article: "Well, Linux certainly isn't most peoples' thought for a games-based PC. Especially one being taken to a big tournament LAN party. However, by design or trickery, none of the tournament games at the event were out-of-bounds to my Linux machine, and rousing games of Call of Duty, Quake 2 and Unreal Tournament 2004 were shared by the HEXUS.net collective and any other gamers who felt like joining in." We ran a story about a similar article back in February.

57 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. printer-friendly layout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  2. Cube by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cube is worth checking out, runs nicely in Linux, and also on the PC so your linux-lorn friends can check it out to. Lots of fraggin' going on there.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Cube by yahwotqa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but the game itself feels like shareware from early 90s.

    2. Re:Cube by smchris · · Score: 4, Interesting


      My feeling too. But then I assume you also ran it single-player. If you just look at it as arenas, they have to be pretty nice for tournaments.

      I'm mostly annoyed that cursor key movements aren't the same as IDs.

    3. Re:Cube by yahwotqa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We used to play it quite a lot over LAN here - some 4-5 players, most of the time. Don't get me wrong, it _is_ fun, but there's still the feeling that something's not quite right.

      The player weapon models, for example - those made me feel like playing shareware, like I wrote above.

  3. Unlike most other Linux gaming articles by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This one seems written by somebody who knows his way around the landscape.

  4. List of games by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a link for games that run on linux. You can check out the high end and low end games listing.

    1. Re:List of games by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or even better, the Linux Game Tome, which is the original site to list games, and also the primary site where Linux game authors post their updates.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:List of games by kuzb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I feel compelled to agree with the parent's colourful analysis. While I'm sure there are a few gems in there, opensource games are largely unrefined. They simply can't stack up to the quality of commercial games.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    3. Re:List of games by joeljkp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or even better, Icculus' list of actual commercial games that run natively on Linux.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    4. Re:List of games by kuzb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, lets see. Black and White comes to mind as an innovative and creative style of play. There is always the Sims, which introduces some interesting gaming dynamics, albiet living a life when you already have one doesn't appeal to some. I particularly liked sacrifice by shiney, which tried to combine elements of a shooter with those of a RTS style game. Not to mention, Homeworld, which was a really polished completely 3d space RTS which was entertaining for weeks instead of an afternoon.

      Not all of these concepts are original, but the execution and quality brought forth in each is lightyears better than anything the opensource community has ever produced. With the possible exception of Nethack, which is so complex and addictive that it remains one of my favorites.

      Nethack, hoever, is the exception. Not the rule. Further, as a person who grew up on infocom adventures, I don't appreciate being called a kid. I played all the classics. And guess what? The best ones then were commercial too! I mean, Elite! Pirates gold! Sundog! Ooo! and who could forget Dungeons of Daggorath on the old trash-80? Not to mention the entire Sierra adventure set when it was still owned by Ken and Roberta Williams. In fact, I'd be willing to bet my computer gaming experience goes back farther than yours. I even owned an original pong tabletop arcade machine (that took quarters) - you don't get much more retro than that.

      In closing - most opensource games DO suck. They're mostly clones of the same boring time-wasters lots of us are sick of. How many times can you play tetris, breakout, solitare and worthless little puzzle games before you want a new experience? So what if some of us crave some icing? Good graphics and sound add to the experience. It's not our fault you're stuck in 1981.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  5. Heh by cerberus4696 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've actually found that the Linux version of UT2004 actually runs a bit better under Linux than under windows. I think it has something to do with the way windows allocates virtual memory; when I run under windows, the game eventually starts stuttering as windows valiantly tries to compensate for my woefully small amount of RAM; under Linux, it seems to keep chugging along just fine.

    1. Re:Heh by cot · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I've actually found that the Linux version of UT2004 actually runs a bit better under Linux than under windows."

      Well, that stands to reason. I'd wager that the Windows version of UT2004 runs better under Windows than Linux.

      --

    2. Re:Heh by c0l0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've made similar experiences with Quake III with Punkbuster enabled. On WinNT 5.x, it seems impossible to get the game to run without SEVERE stuttering for the first 5 or so minutes it's been loaded - even on my 3.5GHz rig with a RAID0-setup. Under Linux, I fire up the binary, and get my 125fps from the very beginning of all the fun. That's just another good reason for Linux being my OS of choice. ;)

      --
      :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

      YTARY!
    3. Re:Heh by mike5904 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How much RAM, and what kind of video card do you have? I've found that Quake3 will run perfectly fine under XP, on the order of 150fps at high detail and 1600x1200 settings, with my 2 year old graphics card, 512MB of memory, and 2.4GHz processor (no disk striping either). I get a little bit less, around 135fps under Linux. Your problem really sounds like a configuration issue.

    4. Re:Heh by jrockway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Incorrect. I remember seeing some benchmarks a while ago about running UT2004 under Wine. The windows version under wine was faster than the windows version under windows.

      Just goes to show you that Windows isn't good for anything. No security, and games are slow too.

      --
      My other car is first.
  6. TransGaming: Unchristian company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    TransGaming is both insulting since it references transubstantiation (Catholic cultism) and transexualism (disgusting liberal plot). We, the righteous OSS community need to boycott these heretics.

    1. Re:TransGaming: Unchristian company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      TransGaming is both insulting since it references transubstantiation (Catholic cultism) and transexualism (disgusting liberal plot). We, the righteous OSS community need to boycott these heretics.

      Are you kidding? Heretic is a great game...

  7. Screw WineX, Cedega... by darth_silliarse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's because of apps like this no-one wants to adopt Linux as a gaming platform. The road will be long and hard but we must stop buying stuff like this and also stop buying Windows games, only when the companies realise there is a genuine market for Linux games will there be any progress. I can hold out, can you?

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Screw WineX, Cedega... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Currently the majority of games that define "the gaming world" do not run on Linux. Give a true gamer the choice of sticking with Windows to play their game or not play their game under Linux, what will they choose? Obviously they'll stick with their game in old Windows. By having programs such as Cedegra it allows users to get a taste of gaming in Linux and show the Game companies that hey Fragging in Linux is indeed possible and inevitable. With that being said, emulation is just a crutch, once a critical mass of Linux gamers is reached native ports should follow.

    2. Re:Screw WineX, Cedega... by rpozz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering Linux has a small marketshare, and is an absolute nightmare to support (due to all the different distros), WineX/Cedega could be a very good way forward. Testing and possibly tweaking a DirectX on Cedega is one hell of a lot easier for a games company to do than a full Linux port.

      There will not be a genuine market for Linux games until people stop dual-booting because they use Windows for games. Chicken and egg scenario.

    3. Re:Screw WineX, Cedega... by martian265 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but I'm too much of a gamer to just boycott games until the publishers/producers start pumping out games designed specifically for Linux. While it's a great idea, I'm afraid that it won't work. I think that they won't start doing this until consumers start buying computers installed with Linux regularly. The executives and marketing/salespeople just don't see the potential yet because most Linux users either build their own machine or install Linux onto a manufacturers machine.

      Personally I would love to completely drop windows, and gaming is the only reason I still have XP. However, that doesn't mean that I'm willing to start boycotting the latest/greatest games, or start buying big manu computers that are sans OS or have Linux installed (I like getting a total custom system without propietary hardware crap and for cheaper than a comparable system from a manu). I realize that makes me "part of the problem", but I don't feel strongly enough about this to make the sacrifice.

      FYI, if you think this is a strange attitude, I should mention that the only reason I ever got into computers was because of gaming. I played games all the way through commodores, amigas, x86s. Warcraft 2 is of course what really threw me full on into the computer world and later the industry.

    4. Re:Screw WineX, Cedega... by adam31 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not trolling (not my intent at least), but the 'majority of games that define the "gaming world"' don't run on PC Windows either... They run on GC, PS2, X-Box, DC, PSP, GBA.

      Go get one and enjoy the world of games, online and offline, that exist. Appreciate linux for whatever reason you decided to install it, but bickering about Respect Aw Communitay is not worth the effort when you can get a console for half the price of a year-old video card!

      It's hard enough for publishers to make money off PC games already without having to worry about linux.
      And if it makes you feel better, I'm positive that Linux games will flourish when the Cell gets a foothold.

    5. Re:Screw WineX, Cedega... by brsmith4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear this argument a lot but I think it is kind of naive... Game developers are focusing their efforts on Windows games. By reimplementing a stable Win32 API for Linux, this makes getting these games on Linux much simpler and cost-effective for the game developers.

      It's because of apps like this no-one wants to adopt Linux as a gaming platform.

      Wrong. It is because the Linux user-base does not represent a target demographic that the game companies can reap reasonable profit from. Cedega does not present developers with a means of complacentcy towards Linux, but an easier entry point when they are convinced it would be a viable market.

      The road will be long and hard but we must stop buying stuff like this and also stop buying Windows games, only when the companies realise there is a genuine market for Linux games will there be any progress.

      stop buying stuff like this will only prove to the gaming companies that Linux is not a viable market with which to sell its goods.

      I can hold out, can you?

      That's silly. Do you think you are actually helping anything by actively boycotting these products? You are taking your capital (as is your choice) and not providing it to the companies that may, very well, create the games on the platform you are so fighting for. If it turns out that Cedega, Wine, etc become a viable API for companies to develop on, due to its compatibility with win32, why not accept that as such? You want them to just up and switch to OpenGL/OpenAL when they are using DirectX? Why not just create DirectX for Linux and make their lives easier? This sort of community good-will will tell these companies that Linux's user-base genuinely wants their titles to run on that platform and they will in turn, ensure that their products run just as well on our Win32 API as it does on Windows Win32 API.

      Remember, when dealing with corporations, it is up to you to prove to the investor that they will make a return. Until we can prove to the gaming industry that Linux presents a great investment, they will not make any efforts on our behalf (unless it is in the form of a kind gesture a la ID, Epic).

    6. Re:Screw WineX, Cedega... by runderwo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Publishers follow the majority install base. Developers follow whichever platform is easier for them to code for. WineX and other emulation technology increase the install base of Linux, attracting publishers. Developers follow whichever platform is easier for them to code for. WineX and other emulation technology allows developers to have Linux targets without having culture shock.

      Yes, WineX is a half-baked alternative to native solutions. But you presume that the native solutions would have existed if it weren't for WineX. Truth be told, the market share of Linux is so miniscule that it is not on most publishers' radar, so the native ports we do get are unofficial and done by people like Ryan Gordon.

      Live with it, or evangelize if you want to reap the spoils of a dominant market share. It's unfortunate that Microsoft goes out of their way to make it difficult for developers to migrate from Windows targets to Linux targets, but such is life when consumers buy Windows without thinking twice about the marketplace ramifications of their choice.

  8. Square peg -- Round hole by spaeschke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see the usual suspects again rear their heads: Quake 3, UT2004, etc, etc, etc. Love Linux on a server, as a games machine you've got to ask yourself why you're ponying up cash for a graphics card that is only going to be used by a handful of games. And if you're such a gamer that Cedega is a must for you, why are you even bothering to screw around with a kludge when you could just dual boot. I guess I'm just not hardcore enough to be that much of a purist that I'd jump through so many damned hoops just to be MS free. I enjoy having access to a huge library of games, and I really enjoy not having to deal with botched textures and subpar performance just to make sure it runs on my pet OS. I'm a gamer first and foremost, and in this day and age that means Microsoft.

    1. Re:Square peg -- Round hole by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I enjoy having access to a huge library of games, and I really enjoy not having to deal with botched textures and subpar performance just to make sure it runs on my pet OS. I'm a gamer first and foremost, and in this day and age that means Microsoft.

      Your focus is gaming, and you're right to choose Microsoft. But for me, I actually use Linux to do work, and I enjoy being able to launch Quake for a quicky, or play Xpilot online while something compiles. Dual boot isn't really an option for me, and I'm glad many games run on Linux, even if they may not give tip-top performance as under Windows. So you see, for some it's not a matter of "pet OS", but a simple question of practicality.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Square peg -- Round hole by mlmitton · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why do we bother? Network externalities. For a number of reasons, I run Linux instead of Windows. I like (but don't love) gaming, and there's no question Windows is the place for that. However, if people don't use games on Linux, then there never will be any games for Linux. It's a chicken and egg problem that *somebody* has to step forward to try and solve. It'll be hard to convince game publishers to be the one to solve it, so that leaves Linux users.

      Those of us who use Linux may need to boot Windows to play a particular game (if we have dual boot--I don't), but why not use Linux when a game is available? And why not let game publishers know that you would rather play, and be more likely to buy, if the game were released under Linux? It has to start somewhere, and that means us.

      --
      "My girlfriend's got sodium laureth sulfate hair."
  9. Interesting answer by Adam9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA:

    Q: Which Linux distributions cause the most headaches for your support people? Which ones Just Work? And which one do you use yourself, given the choice?

    A: Currently I would have to say Gentoo causes the most support requests. With bleeding edge packages and a million and one different configurations in how you can use it, Gentoo has the most support requests by far.

    I wonder if this is true for other packages out there. (This comes from me being a gentoo user)

    1. Re:Interesting answer by termos · · Score: 5, Funny
      Official Gentoo-Linux-Zealot translator-o-matic

      Gentoo Linux is an interesting new distribution with some great features. Unfortunately, it has attracted a large number of clueless wannabes and leprotards who absolutely MUST advocate Gentoo at every opportunity. Let's look at the language of these zealots, and find out what it really means...

      "Gentoo makes me so much more productive."
      "Although I can't use the box at the moment because it's compiling something, as it will be for the next five days, it gives me more time to check out the latest USE flags and potentially unstable optimisation settings."

      "Gentoo is more in the spirit of open source!"
      "Apart from Hello World in Pascal at school, I've never written a single program in my life or contributed to an open source project, yet staring at endless streams of GCC output whizzing by somehow helps me contribute to international freedom."

      "I use Gentoo because it's more like the BSDs."
      "Last month I tried to install FreeBSD on a well-supported machine, but the text-based installer scared me off. I've never used a BSD, but the guys on Slashdot say that it's l33t though, so surely I must be for using Gentoo."

      "Heh, my system is soooo much faster after installing Gentoo."
      "I've spent hours recompiling Fetchmail, X-Chat, gEdit and thousands of other programs which spend 99% of their time waiting for user input. Even though only the kernel and glibc make a significant difference with optimisations, and RPMs and .debs can be rebuilt with a handful of commands (AND Red Hat supplies i686 kernel and glibc packages), my box MUST be faster. It's nothing to do with the fact that I've disabled all startup services and I'm running BlackBox instead of GNOME or KDE."

      "...my Gentoo Linux workstation..."
      "...my overclocked AMD eMachines box from PC World, and apart from the third-grade made-to-break components and dodgy fan..."

      "You Red Hat guys must get sick of dependency hell..."
      "I'm too stupid to understand that circular dependencies can be resolved by specifying BOTH .rpms together on the command line, and that problems hardly ever occur if one uses proper Red Hat packages instead of mixing SuSE, Mandrake and Joe's Linux packages together (which the system wasn't designed for)."

      "All the other distros are soooo out of date."
      "Constantly upgrading to the latest bleeding-edge untested software makes me more productive. Never mind the extensive testing and patching that Debian and Red Hat perform on their packages; I've just emerged the latest GNOME beta snapshot and compiled with -O9 -fomit-instructions, and it only crashes once every few hours."

      "Let's face it, Gentoo is the future."
      "OK, so no serious business is going to even consider Gentoo in the near future, and even with proper support and QA in place, it'll still eat up far too much of a company's valuable time. But this guy I met on #animepr0n is now using it, so it must be growing!"

      -

      --
      Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
    2. Re:Interesting answer by agraupe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Disclaimer: I am a gentoo user.

      Some of that is true, some of it isn't. Firstly, gentoo, for me, isn't about speed or cutting-edge releases: it's about customizability and software management. Portage has never given me any hassles, other than taking up time (which I'm willing to put up with), and I know that, for each program, I get a build with my favorite features. I like debian for this same reason (ease of software managements). I also like the customizability, which comes not only in the form of USE flags, but the fact that most things must be configured to taste. Was doing the first kernel compile easy? Was setting up my soundsystem foolproof? No to both questions, but in the end I think I have a better system. But, yeah, it's a niche market. Why others can't accept that is beyond me...

  10. Random Thoughts by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have a few random thoughts on this issue.

    First Loki is mentioned in the article, in a way that seems to imply that they would be more successful today thanks to the larger installed base (which sounds plausable). That said, it made me think of something. What about Aspyr? They seem to specialize in porting Windows games to the Mac. If they are doing that (which would probably require moving the games to OpenGL and OpenAL if they don't use 'em already), then shouldn't it be a quick walk from there to Linux? Seems like as long as you are moving platforms, the little extra effort for the increased market share you can sell to seems like a good idea.

    Second is Tux Racer. Why do these articles always mention Tux Racer. It was cute that it existed 5 years ago, but the last time I tried it (a year to so ago) it still seemed amaturish (not bad, just simple and not as polished as a "real" game). It just doesn't seem like it should be an example that is trotted out every time one of these articles comes out.

    Too bad we can't just get more people to use OpenGL and OpenAL/SDL/whatever in the first place so things no NEED full ports to be sellable on Linux/BSD/OS X/whatever. If MS were to somehow lose 20%+ market share quickly, the scramble to move these Windows only programs to other OSes would be fun to watch.

    Last but not least... why do I have to pay so much? I moved from PC to Mac and would have to rebuy all my games. The data files are where most of your money is tied up. Write portable, and sell one box with one DVD that works on Win/Lin/Mac. Or just sell a Windows version and when the Linux/Mac version are ready make the files freely downloadable so anyone with a Windows copy run under Linux/Mac.

    If (seemingly) every big console game can come out on all three consoles within a year (usually at the same time), then surely you can launch a computer game that runs on the big 3 OSes (Win, Lin, Mac) without 2+ year porting times. The difference between a Mac and a Linux box are MUCH MUCH SMALLER than between a Cube and a PS2.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Random Thoughts by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You also need to keep in mind that linux users dont buy software and that is the big difference between them and Mac users.

      What's the data to back up that claim? If it's a simple observation - I can offer one too. Every commercial piece of software out there, no matter what platform and to include MacOS and Windows is available as "warez". It would seem that Windows and MacOS users don't pay for software too.

      Of course, we know that's bunk. It's more complex an issue than that. Just as there are considerable offerings available for Linux without a fee... there is also commercial software available for a fee. And people do, in fact, buy that software. I know - I'm one of them.
    2. Re:Random Thoughts by NeoOokami · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last but not least... why do I have to pay so much? I moved from PC to Mac and would have to rebuy all my games. The data files are where most of your money is tied up. Write portable, and sell one box with one DVD that works on Win/Lin/Mac. Or just sell a Windows version and when the Linux/Mac version are ready make the files freely downloadable so anyone with a Windows copy run under Linux/Mac. Now you say that after mentioning Loki and Aspyr, outside porting houses. Now if Aspyr lets you just download their executable to use with Windows version's data files - tell me how Aspyr is making any money? Especially since they just spent all of the effort and money in getting that port done in the first place. If it's from the original company I can understand just letting you use their other version's files, but if a company goes through the work to make the port - they need to make money off of it. Otherwise that'll be the last port you see from them.

  11. Garage Games by mlmitton · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article really should have mentioned Garage Games. Marble Blast and Gish are two of the funnest games I've ever played. If a good game to you is based on eye-candy, then this isn't the place for you. But if a good game is based on game-play, these were the best $20 I've ever spent.

    --
    "My girlfriend's got sodium laureth sulfate hair."
  12. I know exactly what you mean. by fluxrad · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've actually found that the Linux version of UT2004 actually runs a bit better under Linux than under windows.

    That is so true! For some reason, Linux version of UT2004 takes a huge performance hit in Windows.

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  13. Its not Cedegas fault by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's because of apps like this no-one wants to adopt Linux as a gaming platform.
    Not true. If that would be true, game developers would take care that the games runs in Wine/Cedega. They are not - the linux market is not important. If the market would matter, the game developers would use stuff that is easily portable (OpenGL, SDL), if they are not limited by the enviroment (for example the need to use a DirectDraw gfx engine).
    The only game I can think of that took care of wine compatibility and had no native linux version was Master Of Orion III. If your argument ("no one develops for linux because of wine") would be true, there would be far more games like that.

  14. Re:no counter-strike for you by homeobocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Offhand, I know that 1, 2, 3, and 5 work. I'd have to look up WoW.

    --
    MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING
  15. Too late, man by Dolda2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
    We ran a story about a similar article back in February.
    I think someone is trying to make up for all the dupes lately by showing the /. editors actually can remember a previous article once in a while.
  16. Re:Boycott Transgaming by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm working on DirectX 9 for vanila wine, you can checkout the current version from my website. There's another update going up in a few days as well as instructions on patching the wine tree.
    The current state of play is more-or-less everything works except shaders (because I haven't ported them from d3d8 yet), the current version has some texture problems, the fix will be in the next release.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  17. wierd setup by Yonkeltron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people i know have tried cegega and aren't impressed. they claim it's both tough to install and even harder to configure correctly.

    i haven't tried cedega myself, but a simple apt-get install wine has worked perfectly on most systems i use.

    --
    Keep the faith, share the code
  18. Pardon my ignorance but what is "fragging"? by World_Leader · · Score: 2, Interesting


    To an old-timer like me "fragging" meant killing your squad leader (typically a lieutenant) in Vietnam usually either for getting someone busted for smoking pot (or similar), or insisting on going on dangerous patrols (which usually were pointless.)

    But, hey, now KIA is a car brand but to me it still means "Killed In Action", not the most attractive name for a car.

  19. Well, I have to say... by SQLz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I played Max Payne 2 all the way through at 1280x1024 with almost all detail options on and it ran like a dream. Not a single crash, the FPS was great, and it felt native. In fact if I didn't know and saw someone playing it, I would have guessed it was native. I usually prefer native games but if WineX can deliever even a few top notch games that will never be ported to Linux (political/busines reasons), then I'd call it a success. I mean, if they can get 10 games to run like that on Linux, thats like a 100% increase in recent high quality games from the platform. (not counting old Loki stuff, its way to out of date)

    I'm a gamer and I've used Linux exclusively for work since 1997 and have always booted into my Winetendo partition for games. Not having to do that to play a game as good as Max Payne 2 is great.

    Those of you clamoring "native or nothing", good luck. There has been no significant rise in native ports for years. We get 1 or 2 big titles thats it. So, if WineX can deliver 1 or 2 more a year, thats fine with me.

    1. Re:Well, I have to say... by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is that you don't really know what you are missing.

      I was curious, so I benchmarked UT2k4 under Linux and WinXP. I ran the test at 640*480 up to 1280*1024. All options were set to full on.

      Linux always beet WinXP in every test. I was amazed. But then I started looking at the details.

      Under Linux, I was missing FSAA and FSAF. Sure, you can tweak the xf86config file, but under WinXP, it's an in-game option.

      Under Linux, the scenes just looked shittier. Even with both platforms set with AA/AF off, the WinXP scene looked cleaner. Lights were brighter and hilights, shadows, particles, etc all looked better.

      And don't even get me started on bump-mapping.

      Anyway, under Linux, the games run at a decent framerate, but you are always missing a lot of things that add to the atmosphere of the game.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    2. Re:Well, I have to say... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're running with an nVidia card (if you're not, you have bigger problems), then the `nvidia-settings` app included with recent driver releases will let you tweak AA/AF.

  20. linux console by dahlek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Too bad the Indrema (sp?) went nowhere...

    If there was a gaming console based on linux tech (openGL, SDL, Linux the OS, etc), then games could be easily cross-ported to the linux PC I would think, a bit like XBOX and Windows...

    I think that a linux console would be the single best way to slap the world and jump-start linux native gaming. To most ordinary folk, the OS running under the hood wouldn't matter - as a console, it would be: load the dvd, turn on...

  21. Re:Boycott Transgaming by Mystic0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks. :)

    It's good to know that work is being done to provide a free DirectX alternative to Cedega. After all, where would Transgaming be without the Wine Project? I think the Wine folks deserve more respect. Transgaming hasn't been good about returning code to the community; they are more interested in getting subscriptions.

    Much thanks goes to Oliver for his efforts in implementing DirectX 9 for the free software community; I will be sure to check your patch out!

    Long live free software... down with domination by proprietors! ;)

  22. Re:good enough by jrockway · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > You don't understand flightsimmers: we need realism.

    You're lying. Flightgear is ultra-realistic. The military uses it in their flight simulators. You know why it's hard to fly? Because you have to know what you're doing. Flying a real plane is not as simple as turning it on and moving a joystick. Flightgear is a true flight simulator, not a fun game to play.

    --
    My other car is first.
  23. Re:A question I'd like to ask someone like you by Papineau · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simply put, no.

    Most of what Transgaming uses from Wine is from when Wine used the X11 license (last such release was 20020228). Wine now uses the LGPL. There has been some work (ReWind) integrating patches from developers willing to double-license their patches under the old X11 license as well, but that fork is mostly dead now.

    If you actually read the EULA for Cedega, you'll notice that they say that some of the work they distribute is under the LGPL, some other under the Artistic license, etc. So they actually use (as per the LGPL) some parts of Wine. I don't know exactly which ones are under which license, you'd have to look that up yourself.

    Transgaming still have a freely accessible cvs server. I haven't checked it out since a long time ago, but if you want to see which parts are under which license, I guess that'd be a good place to start.

    Each dll can be replaced on an individual basis, so it's very conceivable that it can be under a different license, even if distributed together. The best proof for that (except for things like kernel32 and ntdll) is that you can use the native (Windows) versions instead of the builtin ones (Wine/Cedega).

    I don't have a list of what they contributed either, but I believe the current DCOM work (mostly needed for Installshield support, but also other things) is based on a patch sent by Ove Kåven about two years ago. The Marlett font which comes with Wine is also their work. Of course, don't expect any patches from them which touches DirectX or copy protection.

  24. This is the main drawback for me` by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hate to admit this, but gaming is the sole reason myself and alot of people I know haven't switched completely to linux. While their are alot of games that are "playable" under Linux/Wine, the bottom line is that performace wise, they don't match up to a Windows system. I don't blame the Open Source community for this, in fact I don't really blame anyone. But as long as people, read geeks, don't get equal or superior game performance in linux, they are always going to have a Windows system laying around.

    --


    My sig of choice is Marlboro
    1. Re:This is the main drawback for me` by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      that is the idea!

      That is why the "Dark Forces" threaten *any* company that dare port their games to Linux
      .
      * Half-Life had just about been ported to Linux but then ... silence.

      * Tribes 2 was ported and was extremely successful, then all of a sudden - all distributors were explicitly prohibited in making more copies. Despite huge demand.

      * For sometime people have been lobbying to get WarCraft ported to Linux, the current signature holds 12'000. Not only that was ignored, but the attempt to have a Linux free alternative was immediately culled.

      Again and again - understand - if Linux or Apple become true gaming platform, Microsoft will lose the Desktop war for good.
      That is why we have the Blizzards, Vivendis and Sierras pro-actively stopping such thing from happening.

      Of course they don't mind using Linux to develop game servers; free platform and stability; suits them all very fine ... "thanks very much!" - they say.

  25. Fraggers need only apply. by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it's always good to see some games from genres other than FPS come up when Linux gaming is discussed there is still a huge gap there.

    Of the 10 games I have installed on my Win32 machine right now only 2 of them fall into the FPS genre. That leaves 80% of the games that I normally would expect to play out of what most people would think of in terms of Linux gaming.

    I'll grant that some of the the games could be run in WINE and even one of them, good ol NWN, is directly supported. However if gaming on Linux is to become the reality I think that it should not be so one sided as to expect that people will switch just because of FPS games.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  26. Re:good enough by Sweetshark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You don't understand flightsimmers: we need realism.
    By what you describe Flightgear is too realistic for you. You are looking for something like this:
    http://phoenixosfs.org/
    http://targetware.net/
    Also, I have a large console (yoke, switching, throttle, prop control, mixture) that only works with MS FS2004.
    Oh, Im impressed. How do you think does that compare to this:
    http://www.flightgear.org/Projects/Genesis3000/Gen esis_3000_Overview.html

  27. Re:Linux fortune by TheToon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seconed, Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory is a gem of a game. The objective based and role based team play is better than anything else out there imho. You'll get bored with counter strice, but never with ET! :)

    --
    //TheToon
  28. Re:spot the linux gamer at a con - by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Seriously, as long as linux uses an X windowing system of any kind, it is going to suck for FPS gaming, and many other graphics-intensive games.
    I've run every FPS gave I've had in Linux in full screen mode since the original DOOM and that's the way they are all set to play now. X isn't doing anything else but display your game, so it's doing exactly what MS Windows does in that context.

    I occasionally use X on MS Windows as well - and a decently written X server works quickly there too even on slow hardware. The wrong video driver options can stuff you up anywhere, not just on X, so that can slow things down.

  29. Re: DOS game emulation? by neko9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    DOSEMU stands for DOS Emulation, and allows you to run DOS and many DOS programs, including many DPMI applications such as DOOM and Windows 3.1, under Linux.

    DOSBox is a DOS-emulator that uses the SDL-library which makes DOSBox very easy to port to different platforms. DOSBox has already been ported to many different platforms, such as Windows, BeOS, Linux, MacOS X...

  30. Re:Microsoft ads by TheRealJFM · · Score: 2, Informative

    to remove those annoying ads just add the string *intellitxt* to your adblock rules and refresh the page

    thanks adblock :D

    --
    Joseph Farthing
    http://josephfarthing.com