Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

MiniMo(zilla) Running on Windows Mobile

Posted by timothy on from the quick-progress-worthy-project dept.

webgrappa writes "If you (yes, yes, you that like OpenSource but use Win all the time) own a Windows Mobile Device, in a near future you'll trash Pocket IE and NetFront. MozillaZine has photos of MiniMo running on Windows Mobile Device."

11 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. actual pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://rebron.org/blogarchives/2005/03/minimozilla _com.html

  2. handhelds with browsers by fludlight · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes! No more "cheap viagra now!" popups on my palm pilot!

  3. Palm, sometime? by Justin205 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Come on, when will this be ported to Palm OS? I'm currently using NetFront on my Clie, and while it renders pages pretty great, it's slow. Very slow.

    So, when? Because Minimo on a Palm would be very nice.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    1. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clies are slow. You won't get very fast results.

      Try a recent Palm, but if you really want something powerful, Pocket PC is the only way to go.

      Here's an analogy: Palm OS 4 and below are like the original Mac OS or even DOS on the PC (simple, not very powerful, no multitasking), Palm OS 5 is like System 7 on Mac or Windows 3.1 (a bit more powerful, limited multitasking, a bit less simple), and Windows Mobile is like Windows NT/2000/XP (stable, powerful, and multitasking).

      PalmOS didn't even get devices that used *true* filesystems until very recently (instead of the antiquated and outgrown database format, which didn't really support advanced applications).

    2. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Troll.

      The older Palm OS devices did not have "files". Instead, they had "databases" and "programs". There were no directories - everything was stored in the same level. Databases had types and attributes, like other filesystems, but they were transparent to the user -- they would appear as files in programs. They had a file type field stored with them; it wasn't an extension in the filename, instead it was actually stored as an attribute (like Mac OS.) There was no separation between storage memory and RAM - programs ran right from where they were stored. (Windows Mobile divides storage and program memory into two separate areas. Palm OS 5 may do this, but I'm not sure.)

      You could not just store files on a Palm or access it from a PC like a filesystem; nor could programmers access it like a filesystem. If I wanted to put some JPEGs on a Palm, I'd either need special software to convert it, or a brand new Palm that does use a filesystem, or a Palm with a SD/MMC card. Windows Mobile has a hierarchial file system... much cleaner and easier to work with. You can just copy/add/remove files as you normally would.

      WinFS isn't a filesystem in the traditional sense. It still uses NTFS as its underlying filesystem, but uses SQL (and MS SQL Server 2005)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS

  4. Minimo on desktops? by Shachaf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Minimo seems to require a relatively small amount of memory (compared to Mozilla or Firefox), has anyone ever considered porting it back to the desktop so it can be used as a very lightweight browser on desktop?

  5. Download Minimo by Shachaf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just noticed that Minimo for WinCE can already be downloaded at http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6 097.

  6. Re:MiniMo? by flithm · · Score: 5, Funny

    how does minimo sound homosexual? (not that there's anything wrong with it if it does). If it bothers you just deepen your voice and say it like you're sharpening an axe or something.

    It's totally in how you say it. For example, right now I'm prancing around saying "Mantorp!" in a really high pitched girly voice. How do you like that?

    Which sounds "gay" now huh? [Deep Axe Murderer Voice] MiniMo@$*&! or [Prancy Girl Voice] Mantorp!

    Yeah I thought so.

    And just so you know. Homosexuals everywhere are offended by your use of the word gay. I could see if they named it "HomoMo" or "AnalMo" or maybe even "SuperFlamingMo" but MiniMo? No way...

    And while we're on the topic, are you really so insecure about a simple word like "MiniMo" that you might think twice about using a superior browser to one that's total crap yet has a name like "SteakKnife Gun Browser?"

    Maybe we should all join hands and prance around saying Mantorp, because you know what... I BET IT'S MORE FITTING!

  7. Re:MiniMo? by r.jimenezz · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Mínimo" is Spanish for minimal.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
  8. "We've created a clone of Mozilla... by d_54321 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...one eighth your size"

    "I shall call him... mini-mo"

    --
    Support the FairTax
  9. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by nxtw · · Score: 5, Informative
    And the change to filesystem methodology for Palms is a good thing WHY?

    New applications. Multimedia. More demanding games. Because the competition is both more advanced *and* has taken over market share.

    The old database-style techniques were far more efficient. When PalmOne moved to a filesystem-based architecture with the Treo 650, users found that N megs of RAM in the new device was equivalent to N/2 megs of RAM in the old device.

    It was never "equivalent". First, PalmOne should have included more RAM in the Treo 650. Second, a sacrifice in efficency is necesarry. However, the way in which they mapped old databases to files was not very efficent. The old system was hindering the platform greatly.

    PalmOS has always been more efficient and far better than Windows Mobile for any embedded device.

    PalmOS was very kludgy, not 32-bit, etc. If by "embedded device" you mean "plain-jane simple organizer", I agree completely.

    PalmOS devices have historically been more usable despite 1/10 the processing power of a WinCE device

    WinCE has had the same basic architecture from the beginning. While it didn't work out as well to begin with (the OS wasn't very mature and hardware wasn't too great,) it has evolved and is now a very decent platform. PalmOS devices have always been usable, and rather simple to use, but you can't use it for much.

    As for processing power - clearly they needed more. The old Dragonball CPUs took a few seconds to decode JPEGs and had no hope at playing mp3s.

    thanks to the fact that PalmOS was designed from the ground up for mobile devices

    It was designed for simple organizers.

    while WinCE and its bastard brethren are a horrendous hack.

    That's an unsubstantiated anti-Microsoft troll.

    PalmOS still does not have anything close to the mutlimedia support present on Windows Mobile (yes, people *do* like to put music on their PDAs and watch movies too), nor does it have the advanced gaming or emulation support (yes, people like to play games too.) For those that like to multitask... they can. I can run IRC, AIM, browse the web, and play music (streaming radio if I want it to be), all at the same time. And you can do so much from the device itself - you don't need to have a computer with the right software to be able to install software, mess around, etc.

    Unfortunately, PalmOS 5.x is a step backwards. POS 5.x runs on significantly faster hardware than OS4, with practically no benefits in 95% of situations. It's still a hell of a lot better than any mobile version of Windows.

    Step backwards? Do you think they switched to ARM because it was a step backwards? No. They needed to move forward. Windows Mobile does so much more, and people see that. PalmOne is really struggling to catch up now. People enjoy using their PDAs to go online and play mp3s. "95% of situations" of what Palm OS did originally won't benefit from a faster CPU, but what people want to do now requires a faster CPU.