Slashdot Mirror


MiniMo(zilla) Running on Windows Mobile

webgrappa writes "If you (yes, yes, you that like OpenSource but use Win all the time) own a Windows Mobile Device, in a near future you'll trash Pocket IE and NetFront. MozillaZine has photos of MiniMo running on Windows Mobile Device."

48 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. actual pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://rebron.org/blogarchives/2005/03/minimozilla _com.html

  2. handhelds with browsers by fludlight · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes! No more "cheap viagra now!" popups on my palm pilot!

    1. Re:handhelds with browsers by passion · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean you won't get messages anymore telling you that "you need to enlarge your tool"?

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:handhelds with browsers by nmarus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cheap pop up viagra? No PUN intended?

      --
      Nicholas Marus
  3. Palm, sometime? by Justin205 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Come on, when will this be ported to Palm OS? I'm currently using NetFront on my Clie, and while it renders pages pretty great, it's slow. Very slow.

    So, when? Because Minimo on a Palm would be very nice.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    1. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clies are slow. You won't get very fast results.

      Try a recent Palm, but if you really want something powerful, Pocket PC is the only way to go.

      Here's an analogy: Palm OS 4 and below are like the original Mac OS or even DOS on the PC (simple, not very powerful, no multitasking), Palm OS 5 is like System 7 on Mac or Windows 3.1 (a bit more powerful, limited multitasking, a bit less simple), and Windows Mobile is like Windows NT/2000/XP (stable, powerful, and multitasking).

      PalmOS didn't even get devices that used *true* filesystems until very recently (instead of the antiquated and outgrown database format, which didn't really support advanced applications).

    2. Re:Palm, sometime? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6 097

      No, and from responses to previous times this question has been asked (it gets asked at least once every time someone mentions Minimo...), porting to Palm OS 5.x or below would be very hard. There was speculation that Palm OS 6 would make it a bit easier (but it'd still require someone to invest a bunch of time...)

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Troll.

      The older Palm OS devices did not have "files". Instead, they had "databases" and "programs". There were no directories - everything was stored in the same level. Databases had types and attributes, like other filesystems, but they were transparent to the user -- they would appear as files in programs. They had a file type field stored with them; it wasn't an extension in the filename, instead it was actually stored as an attribute (like Mac OS.) There was no separation between storage memory and RAM - programs ran right from where they were stored. (Windows Mobile divides storage and program memory into two separate areas. Palm OS 5 may do this, but I'm not sure.)

      You could not just store files on a Palm or access it from a PC like a filesystem; nor could programmers access it like a filesystem. If I wanted to put some JPEGs on a Palm, I'd either need special software to convert it, or a brand new Palm that does use a filesystem, or a Palm with a SD/MMC card. Windows Mobile has a hierarchial file system... much cleaner and easier to work with. You can just copy/add/remove files as you normally would.

      WinFS isn't a filesystem in the traditional sense. It still uses NTFS as its underlying filesystem, but uses SQL (and MS SQL Server 2005)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS

  4. Nice to have a choice. by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Apparently though if you're on a page with a word larger than seven characters, apparently you get the famous screen-widening effect.

    I just wish they'd distribute Firefox instead of Mozilla -- it makes a noticable difference on the desktop, and I'd imagine an even more sizeable one on a cellphone. Although I just recently saw a DivX movie on a friend's system, so maybe they're powerful enough to tolerate a little bloat.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Nice to have a choice. by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firefox shares the same code base as Mozilla, but is rewritten without the non-browser stuff to make it faster. Likely Minimo is also written without the extra junk (who needs Composer on their cell phone?) already, so basing it on Firefox would probably not make any of the kind of differences you're talking about.

  5. Fantastic! by MBCook · · Score: 3, Informative
    I got a Dell Axim x50v right before Christmas and I love the little thing to death. It's screen is amazing. Some parts of WM2003se aren't perfect, but overall it is a nice little device.

    That said I am often frustrated by PocketIE. While it works (and rather well) the fact that you can't have more than one window open (no tabs) SERIOUSLY hampers me. I can't tell you how many times I'd like to open a link in a second window/tab to look at in a minute or load while I continue reading, or open a collection of 2/3 links to look at. But instead I have to choose one or the other and read that now. Then I have to remember how to get back to where I was to find the other links, and remember which links those were. I haven't browsed using a single window on any platform in at least 5 years, probably more. So this feels like a HUGE limitation to me and really cramps my browsing style.

    Having not only a second option from Pockete IE, but one that might allow me tabs/windows would be fantastic. I will download it the second it's released.

    Horray for MiniMo!

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Fantastic! by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Informative

      If all you want is tabbed browsing, then try ftxPBrowser. It is a freeware "wrapper" for IE that supports tabbed browsing, full-screen browsing, and a few other enhancements.
      http://park15.wakwak.com/~ftx/ftxp3e/

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
  6. Minimo on desktops? by Shachaf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Minimo seems to require a relatively small amount of memory (compared to Mozilla or Firefox), has anyone ever considered porting it back to the desktop so it can be used as a very lightweight browser on desktop?

    1. Re:Minimo on desktops? by natrius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Galeon and Epiphany.

  7. this is part relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the topic of those who profess to love OSS and free software but do not use it, who has a link to the slashdot usage statistics?

    I remember seeing only about 20% mozilla and 80% IE on windows or something for a slashdotting. Pretty disgraceful (not all of that can be "we have to use it at work").

    Links would be nice for a little sub-discussion of the issue (issue which was brought up in the topic for those "off topic" happy mods).

    cheers.

    1. Re:this is part relevant by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No rational man could consider the world to be round.

  8. Honestly... by koreaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's what Opera is for. Mini devices. Fork over the $30 or however much it costs, it's worth it if you use your device to surf the web.

    1. Re:Honestly... by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or... you know.... download Mozilla, and not pay $30 for what is free everywhere else in the world. (The ability to browse pages on a less crappy browser)

    2. Re:Honestly... by Rits · · Score: 3, Informative

      Difference is, you can browse the web now with Opera on millions of mobile devices powered by Symbian and Linux. There is even a test version of Opera for Windows Mobile Smartphone Edition.

      That Minimo Google-on-phone screenshot didn't look exactly inviting. Getting small-screen rendering right is not the trivial effort some people think it is. Opera has spend a lot of time and resources on getting it right.

      --
      If you don't like having choices made for you, you should start making your own. - Neal Stephenson
    3. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but no it isn't. The Internet is free, and a browser is the most basic componant to access the net, so it too, should be free.

    4. Re:Honestly... by Duckman5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In all truth, that was the first thing I went to do as soon as I saw how crippled Pocket IE was on my Dell Axim, but upon reviewing Opera's download page I realized that they do not have a solution for my platform. You can see in the right where it clearly states that the Windows Mobile version of Opera does not run on Pocket PC devices. Total bummer.
      Now, with Minimo, I have another choice in browsers. Hopefully this will support the features that I want, not the least of which is the ability to have more than one window open.

  9. thank you! by caryw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thank god. The crappy html browser in the windows smartphone platform (bastardized internet explorer) was the only thing holding me back from getting one of the smartphones out there today. Symbian is still a hot contender but most symbian phones are way too bulky for my use. For some reason the windows smartphones seem to be much slimmer. Sendo has a nice proprietary smartphone setup with their Sendo X but they still haven't worked all the bugs out. The ability to use a "real" browser with a smartphone just tipped the scales, goodbye Ericsson P910!
    Link to minimo project
    --Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

  10. Download Minimo by Shachaf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just noticed that Minimo for WinCE can already be downloaded at http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6 097.

  11. Name Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    MiniMo? Some other suggestions:

    BrushFire
    DamnSmallMozilla
    MoWin
    Fox Trot (it's a mobile device, isn't it?)
    Fox-CE (pronounced Foxy)
    Small Fox (it can be a catchy epidemic)
    LilMo

  12. Re:MiniMo? by flithm · · Score: 5, Funny

    how does minimo sound homosexual? (not that there's anything wrong with it if it does). If it bothers you just deepen your voice and say it like you're sharpening an axe or something.

    It's totally in how you say it. For example, right now I'm prancing around saying "Mantorp!" in a really high pitched girly voice. How do you like that?

    Which sounds "gay" now huh? [Deep Axe Murderer Voice] MiniMo@$*&! or [Prancy Girl Voice] Mantorp!

    Yeah I thought so.

    And just so you know. Homosexuals everywhere are offended by your use of the word gay. I could see if they named it "HomoMo" or "AnalMo" or maybe even "SuperFlamingMo" but MiniMo? No way...

    And while we're on the topic, are you really so insecure about a simple word like "MiniMo" that you might think twice about using a superior browser to one that's total crap yet has a name like "SteakKnife Gun Browser?"

    Maybe we should all join hands and prance around saying Mantorp, because you know what... I BET IT'S MORE FITTING!

  13. Meh. by oGMo · · Score: 4, Informative

    On my Zaurus SL-C860, I can run the real Firefox (or Mozilla) with pdaXrom, not to mention a whole load of other apps, including abiword, gnumeric, and other apps that, while not exactly full-blown on the PC side, completely blow away anything on the PDA side.

    With the latest betas, things are working with very minimal headache. If you're looking for PDA apps, this is a dream come true; if you're looking for a unix workstation in your pocket, this is also a dream come true. Or if you want gvim and gcc in your pocket. Or if you want snes9x in your pocket. Etc. You get the picture.

    It's really awesome to have a Linux workstation in your pocket that can dial via bluetooth through your cellphone anywhere you can get reception. Take photos with your camera, edit them right there with the latest GIMP, upload them to your server.

    It may seem obscenely expensive for a PDA, but it's also obscenely functional. You can't find a laptop this size, and it does just about everything you'd want a laptop to, except play the latest 3D games.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  14. MiniMo seems lonly by DarkMantle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Minimo needs some companions.

    Like MiniLarry, and MiniCurly.

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  15. opera by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    nothing really compares to the size and quality of opera. It even supports common Linux handhelds (minimo is not Qtopia based so it only runs under X). But more than that opera has the BEST small screen rendering.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  16. It Works! by Bionic_Baboon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It just doesn't render very good. I wrote this post using it on my Axim x50v.

  17. Re:Really though! by ChatHuant · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who uses the internet on there Pocket PC? It takes way to long just to type in a web address!

    You don't have to type the URL every time you go to a site, you know? That's what favorites/bookmarks and links are for. I mostly use the PocketPC to check my favorite sites and not for general browsing. And for this type of usage it's great.

  18. Re:MiniMo? by r.jimenezz · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Mínimo" is Spanish for minimal.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
  19. Playstation 2 port? by Mongoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't looked into this, but does it have a Playstation 2 port? Running netfront is ok, but it would be nice to have mozilla on a PS2.

    Hell, I might be willing to help with the port -- you never know when I'll need it for PSP too. hah

    1. Re:Playstation 2 port? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla has been available for the PS2 for ages. Just get the Linux kit. I think it was the third thing I installed. (Distributed.Net client, Moria, Mozilla...)

  20. .003 is interesting but in its infancy by unuselessj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised at how quickly a port was done from Familar Linux to WinCE/WM2003. I have a Dell Axim X5 from a few years back. When extracted, the current version is about 15MB, 9MB going for winembed.exe. From what I've heard, users running WM2003SE have more problems than those you have slightly older devices. It seems like Minimo isn't using any windows mobile or ce.net specific APIs. The top bar is forced to the bottom of the screen, the bottom bar doesn't exist and the input toggle is forced onto the top bar. This caused a conflict with ICBar and will probably cause conflicts with similar ICBar based UI customization programs.

    Forms and links don't work yet, but it is almost akward seeing a website rendered just as it would be on a full browser, especially after suffering through Pocket IE.

    It looks good on the ipaq linux conversions.

  21. actual link (for us lazy ones) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  22. So, how about for the Zaurus 5x00/6000? by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2

    How long until MiniMo is ported to the Zaurus 5x00/6000L on the default Sharp ROM or OPIE ROM? I'm going to venture a wild guess of "never", seeing as I'm fairly sure this would likely require a rewrite of practically all the GUI code (to use QTopia libs)...

  23. PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And the change to filesystem methodology for Palms is a good thing WHY?

    The old database-style techniques were far more efficient. When PalmOne moved to a filesystem-based architecture with the Treo 650, users found that N megs of RAM in the new device was equivalent to N/2 megs of RAM in the old device.

    PalmOS has always been more efficient and far better than Windows Mobile for any embedded device. PalmOS devices have historically been more usable despite 1/10 the processing power of a WinCE device thanks to the fact that PalmOS was designed from the ground up for mobile devices, while WinCE and its bastard brethren are a horrendous hack.

    Unfortunately, PalmOS 5.x is a step backwards. POS 5.x runs on significantly faster hardware than OS4, with practically no benefits in 95% of situations. It's still a hell of a lot better than any mobile version of Windows.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by nxtw · · Score: 5, Informative
      And the change to filesystem methodology for Palms is a good thing WHY?

      New applications. Multimedia. More demanding games. Because the competition is both more advanced *and* has taken over market share.

      The old database-style techniques were far more efficient. When PalmOne moved to a filesystem-based architecture with the Treo 650, users found that N megs of RAM in the new device was equivalent to N/2 megs of RAM in the old device.

      It was never "equivalent". First, PalmOne should have included more RAM in the Treo 650. Second, a sacrifice in efficency is necesarry. However, the way in which they mapped old databases to files was not very efficent. The old system was hindering the platform greatly.

      PalmOS has always been more efficient and far better than Windows Mobile for any embedded device.

      PalmOS was very kludgy, not 32-bit, etc. If by "embedded device" you mean "plain-jane simple organizer", I agree completely.

      PalmOS devices have historically been more usable despite 1/10 the processing power of a WinCE device

      WinCE has had the same basic architecture from the beginning. While it didn't work out as well to begin with (the OS wasn't very mature and hardware wasn't too great,) it has evolved and is now a very decent platform. PalmOS devices have always been usable, and rather simple to use, but you can't use it for much.

      As for processing power - clearly they needed more. The old Dragonball CPUs took a few seconds to decode JPEGs and had no hope at playing mp3s.

      thanks to the fact that PalmOS was designed from the ground up for mobile devices

      It was designed for simple organizers.

      while WinCE and its bastard brethren are a horrendous hack.

      That's an unsubstantiated anti-Microsoft troll.

      PalmOS still does not have anything close to the mutlimedia support present on Windows Mobile (yes, people *do* like to put music on their PDAs and watch movies too), nor does it have the advanced gaming or emulation support (yes, people like to play games too.) For those that like to multitask... they can. I can run IRC, AIM, browse the web, and play music (streaming radio if I want it to be), all at the same time. And you can do so much from the device itself - you don't need to have a computer with the right software to be able to install software, mess around, etc.

      Unfortunately, PalmOS 5.x is a step backwards. POS 5.x runs on significantly faster hardware than OS4, with practically no benefits in 95% of situations. It's still a hell of a lot better than any mobile version of Windows.

      Step backwards? Do you think they switched to ARM because it was a step backwards? No. They needed to move forward. Windows Mobile does so much more, and people see that. PalmOne is really struggling to catch up now. People enjoy using their PDAs to go online and play mp3s. "95% of situations" of what Palm OS did originally won't benefit from a faster CPU, but what people want to do now requires a faster CPU.

  24. Re:Windows bleh.. by nxtw · · Score: 2, Informative

    No way. Nearly impossible. Not only would it require an extremely long time to do this, such an application would be both enormously complex and so different than the original that'd it be much easier to write a brand new browser. Symbian platform would be a bit easier, as would Palm OS, but as you see here, Windows Mobile handheld platforms aren't too much trouble, and Linux is hardly any work at all. Java MIDP has many constraints, such as the lack of a true filesystem and memory/filesize constraints, that would make this very difficult. The one MIDP Java web browser (ReqWireless, I think) I've seen uses a special proxy to pre-render pages into an easy-to-digest format. An older version of Handspring Blazer did the same thing.

  25. "We've created a clone of Mozilla... by d_54321 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...one eighth your size"

    "I shall call him... mini-mo"

  26. Windows Mobile Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah Ha! Now we know where those pesky WMDs are!

  27. Zaurus port? by samdu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When will there be a Zaurus port of this? I'm aware of only one such project, but thus far I've been unable to get Firefox to run on the standard Sharp ROM. I tried OpenZaurus but it was buggy. It certainly would be nice to be able to run Firefox on the many Linux-based handhelds.

  28. Ran Minimo on GPE, wasn't all that by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I went to the extra trouble of installing recent builds of GPE and OPIE (based on Familiar 0.8) on an iPaq h5450 I got from work. I ran Minimo under GPE, but didn't find it all that useful. It didn't even have bookmarks, so I'd have to type in my sites by hand each time. The konqueror-based browser under opie was much nicer.

    I got my greatest kick from installing a 1GB CF card in it and running debian-ARM off of it using chroot. I could run mozilla on a 640x480 vnc virtual framebuffer, displayed using OPIE's nice VNC client keypebble in 1/2 scale full screen mode. It was readable, fully functional (albeit a bit slow) and the scrollbars were a nice small size (I don't know why all of the programs in GPE and OPIE need such large scrollbars that take up, like, 5-10% of the meager screen real estate). Unfortunately, keypebble would consume all of the CPU time on screen refreshes, so this wasn't very good for battery life.

    Anyway, the touchscreen crapped out soon thereafter, which means I can't get past the calibration screen under WinCE or OPIE, so now I'm pretty much stuck with GPE (which uses xstroke and isn't as picky as the iPaq digitizer calibration hardware, I guess). But it's still kinda painful to try to push buttons since all my strokes are skewed a bit, no matter how I calibrate the screen now.

    So I'm pretty much back to reading pages with Plucker and occasionally Avantgo on my aging Visor Pro, even though it's starting to lose lines on its greyscale screen and the button don't register half the time unless I stroke them a certain way. For my part, I'm planning on holding out until someone offers a cameraless GSM Treo 650 (so I can use it at work - does anyone know if it's straightforward enough to just open it up and remove it yourself?). From there, I'd hope I could move straight to a Zaurus-phone in a few years, if I could afford to have one knocking around in my pockets.

    It's nice that Minimo is progressing, but I'd much rather see a full firefox with a slimmed UI, especially since the devices are powerful enough to support this already.

  29. Better browsers for PocketPC have been around... by shoolz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try: http://park15.wakwak.com/~ftx/

    I've been using it for about 2 years... tabbed browsing, text sizing, 'simply view' mode (no side scrolling or useless formatting), and the app is a mere 73K. Nice.

  30. Lightweight browsers by r3jjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you really need a lightweight web browser for an older machine, I would recommend

    Dillo - a nice lightweight browser, but no CSS or Javascript. Requiress GTK something.

    Links 2 - Runs in X, frame buffer, SVGA. Some CSS and Javascript support.

    Both are very lightweight and I've used both on ancient machines that needed "something." I'll usually include Firefox as a backup for sites that really need it.
  31. I'll stick with NetFront for now... by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got NetFront 3 on my h6315, and it works fairly well. It definitely does a better (albeit still quite imperfect) job at rendering pages for easy hand-readability than Pocket IE. As anyone with a Pocket PC knows, the worst thing in the world is a page that renders in such a way that requires you to scroll left and right and back again over and over to read a column of text. It doesn't look like MiniMo does anything to address that (yet, anyway).

    Anyone here had the misery of trying to read /. on Pocket IE? /. seriously needs to get with the program and create alternate layouts for this stuff. Google's smart enough to detect that you're using a handheld and arrange itself accordingly, why shouldn't /.? Has anyone else noticed that GMail has a non-DHTML version now that works with old/non-standard browsers such as Pocket IE? Of course, I just use the POP mail, but it's nice anyway.

    Other features of Netfront are some Javascript capability, and tabs, fullscreen browsing, and scroll mode (where your stylus moves the page, which helps a lot with the ones that don't render well). MiniMo will need all of these features before I consider switching.

  32. No real zoom though (unlike opera) by Ezza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you look you'll see that the Google logo is at 1:1 resolution.
    That's because the gecko renderer doesn't support "true" zoom of text + images (yet), so until that's fixed it'll only be useful if you've got a nice big screen (and/or you like to scroll). Of course the Opera engine has been able to do this for years..
    The relevant mozilla bug is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
    (copy & paste to your browser)

    --
    I'm a perfectionist but I'm trying to cut back.
  33. Obligatory by Creamsickle · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's an unsubstantiated anti-Microsoft troll.

    You must be new here.

    --
    On the 0th day, God created C