Slashdot Mirror


Apple Wins Against Bloggers

linuxwrangler writes "Saying that no one has the right to publish information that could have been provided only by someone breaking the law, judge James Kleinberg ruled that online reporters for Apple Insider and PowerPage must reveal their sources. No word yet on an appeal."

13 of 672 comments (clear)

  1. Sources by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Apple,

    I heard it on Slashdot.org

    There was this guy, I think he was call Anthony Coward or something, and he was telling me all about the fab new stuff. ...

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Sources by Anthony+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      This .sig is the short tail.
  2. Apple is evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    head spinning ...must stop self destruct sequence..

  3. Little Known Fact about this story by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1, Funny

    The submitter was actually Steve Jobs, but he had to use the codename "linuxwrangler" since Slashdot couldn't post any information from an Apple employee. I mean, how can Slashdot distinguish between what Apple considers a trade secret and what they don't if Apple doesn't tell them before hand?

  4. Re:Don't judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Ever since Bill Gates befriended Satan, Steve jobs has been playing catch-up. Today at 1 infinite loop Mr. Jobs stated "Hey, if Bill can be in league with Satan to dominate the world, then I can do it better and more stylishly"

  5. And yet, on the other hand... by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Funny

    People who publish trade secrets that might hurt a company are forced to reveal their sources, but people who publish Top Secret documents are protected. (Anybody remember that stupid ruling on The Pentagon Papers?) I guess that proves that businesses are more important than National Security.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  6. Re:A refreshing victory for common sense by f0dder · · Score: 2, Funny

    pfft... he only had the whole day to compose it. /money says he's been hitting refresh on slashdot just ready to post.

  7. My Best Interest by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    My two "Mac the Knife" coffee mugs from the rumor column in MacWeek will probably rake in more on eBay after this ruling.

    Gosh, I feel so sorry that the rumor mongers secrets will be revealed when they didn't want them to be, but it's all in my best interest of making money!

    Hmm, where have I heard that argument before. :-)

  8. Re:A refreshing victory for common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's the most insightful first post I have EVER read

    No, I believe this is the very insightful first post.

  9. Re:What to think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fortunately for me, I'm a geek who doesn't like Apple OR reporters, so don't have that dilemma.

  10. Re:A refreshing victory for common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    >>pfft... he only had the whole day to compose it.
    >Um, the decision in the case wasn't released until a couple of hours ago, smarty-pants.

    Oh, yeah? Well maybe he got the information from a blog before it was released, mister not-so-smarty-pants.

    nyah, nyah! c.p. c.p. c.p. c.p.

  11. Re:FUCK YOUR WHORE OF A MOTHER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your interest in my mother has been noted, but you aren't her type.

  12. Re:Yeah, its great by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 2, Funny

    By that reasoning, reporters should have blanket immunity against speeding tickets. Because you never know. They could be speeding in pursuit of a story!

    You're not doing very well tonight with your commenting. Maybe it would be a good idea for you to take a little time off, maybe go have some pie.

    You'll get your groove back, I'm sure of it.