Slashdot Mirror


Whirlwinds on Mars, From the Ground

Neil Halelamien writes "Back in 1999, satellite images were photographed of 5-mile-high whirlwinds streaking across the surface of Mars. A couple of months ago the Spirit rover got a close up view of whirlwind tracks, and this past week photographed a whirlwind in action (animation). It's thought that these dust devils may be responsible for the mystery power boost to the rovers' solar cells. Last year the rovers also spotted clouds and frost."

40 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Animation by FTL · · Score: 5, Informative
    Incase you are wondering about the /.ed animation, it is a two-frame, black and white, 1MB gif. The first frame shows a small whirlwind in the distance, the second frame doesn't show the whirlwind.

    Not impressive compared to the tornado footage we're used to from the local TV station. But one must remember that the rovers' actions are scripted in advance. So it was a complete coincidence that a whirlwind happened to be in-frame when they took a photo. Which says something about how common they must be if we just happened to snag a picture of one.

    If you are still interested, here's a mirror.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Animation by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, it won't tell us anything about how common they are until they snag a picture of another one :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Animation by CrackedButter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks more like a ghost to be honest. The ghost of Beagle WOOOOOOOO....

    3. Re:Animation by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Calling it an "animation" is stretching it pretty far. The second frame isn't even on-register with the first one, so it's really just a pair of "with" and "without" snapshots.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Animation by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Informative

      it won't tell us anything about how common they are until they snag a picture of another one

      Yeah it does. We can assume that a tornado is visible 1/Nth of the time, where N is the total number of pictures taken by the rover, and the 1 represents the picture with the tornado visible.

      If the rover snags a picture of another tornado it will increase the accuracy of our prediction slightly.

    5. Re:Animation by Surazal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the rover snags a picture of another tornado it will increase the accuracy of our prediction slightly.

      If it doesn't find another tornado, then that also will increase the accuracy of the prediction slightly. ;)

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    6. Re:Animation by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is way way way too simple. You have to take into consideration the field of view, the amount of movement, the frequency of the pictures, the speed of the phenomenon, and the relatively short time in Mars' period that we have had rovers there :P For all we know there's ten times as many (or ten times fewer) tornadoes in other parts of Mars, due to terrain features...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Animation by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The freaky thing is that this comes one day after "Mission to Mars" came on local TV. Hmmmm... Perhaps it's a sign that Germany has joined the Deep Space Lie program (you know, the one that tries to make uns believe that there are other planets beside Earth). I better go get my tin foil helmet.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:Animation by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it won't tell us anything about how common they are until they snag a picture of another one :)

      They can count the darkened dust trails from orbit. In fact, they caught some in progress from orbit. You see a dark trail that ends in a whitish puff IIRC. If they monitor an area from orbit over months or years, they can get a better estimate of the change rate. Plus, if it was a dust devil that cleaned the panels, that is another "hit". And, Pathfinder imaged one also.

    9. Re:Animation by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Informative
      Calling it an "animation" is stretching it pretty far. The second frame isn't even on-register with the first one, so it's really just a pair of "with" and "without" snapshots.

      I used to work on MER, and I discussed this issue with Daniel Crotty (the man who made the animation featured here), and it was decided that:
      1. Good coregistration was too difficult with the available information. I've written coregistration code before, for the CAHV linearized images, however there are serious problems when using the CAHVOR or CAHVORE model images (Navcam is CAHVOR). This is because not only is the distortion in the model nonlinear, but it depends on the distance of the point from the camera - something that we can only approximate using a planar surface model. My suggestion for coregistration, given the current information, would be to do feature matching to generate a set of "equivilent" points in each image plane, and create a function which, given a relative position and orientation, would generate rays from each matching point. A nonlinear optimization algorithm (perhaps simplex method solver) would then iterate until it found a relative position/orientation that minimized the mean square distance between "equivilent" rays. I believe this is similar to how much motion tracking software works. This is, however, quite difficult to do without a preprogrammed software package designed to do this. After this the second image would still have to be projected on to the planar model of Mars, which is also nontrivial.
      2. From a purely scientific point of view, "proper" coregistration is almost entirely unnecessary. Because of the fact that the phenomenon is so far away, the far field effect takes care of almost all of the error. There is a two dimensional coregistration method that could be used for this purpose (Alex Hayes, Cornell '03, described it in his honors thesis) using multiple fourier transforms, one in linear space (for shifts), and one in radial/logarithmic space (for rotations and scaling).


      Anyways I think the current image serves the public just fine. The file is so large because it was created in GIMP, which does not seem to support LZW compression of GIF images for a legal (?) reason. (I thought the patent expired...)

      As for it not being an animation... how many frames do you need for something to be an animation?

      Cheers,
      Justin Wick
  2. For the hardcore: by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Now we're assuming they're cleaning, but all we can really say is that overnight the solar panels produced between 2 and 5 percent additional power immediately,'' he said. "We're surmising that for some reason dust is being removed from the solar panel and that's increasing the efficiency of the sunlight being converted to electricity."

    Any hardcore space-geeks care to propose any other explanation?

    Seriously, i'm just wondering what else might explain this, because enough moving atmosphere on Mars to clean the panels is very interesting to me. Other possibilities anyone?

    1. Re:For the hardcore: by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Motion of the rovers? I would imagine the lower moisture levels (if any) would make the dust there less sticky. I'd be curious to know if the rovers went through any serious inclines just bfore the power boost. Or if there was any unusually extensie activity of the probe arm and/or drill.

    2. Re:For the hardcore: by ckemp.org · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing confuses me, too: when the wind picks up on Mars, it turns into a dust storm, which I'm assuming dumps dust on the solar panels. Why would the whirlwind not pick up dust as well and deposit it on the panels? The twister in the picture seems relatively clear, consisting the red dust of the planet.

    3. Re:For the hardcore: by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something is eating the dust?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    4. Re:For the hardcore: by sydres · · Score: 3, Interesting

      perhaps it has something to do with static charges maybe the rover comes into contact with a bit of ionized particles wich drains the neutralizes the static charge on the rover

    5. Re:For the hardcore: by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The air pressure could have dropped enough to cause the dust to evaporate, a dust devil is a sign of low air pressure.

      Though this is about as probable as a bugs bunny cleaning the panels with his tail whilst chasing marvin.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:For the hardcore: by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know how much credence the idea has right now, but the original guess I heard from JPL was it was water vapor was causing the dust to clump as it condensed, froze and expanded, then melted and evaporated or else sublimated. Of course, they took pictures of the solar panels on Opportunity and didn't see any clumps, so if they existed, the clumped dust must have been more susceptible to being blown off in a gentle breeze. They have, however, taken several pictures of frost on the rovers.

  3. Dear God! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you followed the animation link? There is something at the bottom that looks like a tiny tinfoil hat that appears and disappears and reappears ad nauseam! Just thinking about it I have whirlwinds in my head... I need to get some sleep.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  4. Noooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's thought that these dust devils may be responsible for the mystery power boost to the rovers' solar cells.

    It was Martians who powered them up!! This dust devil theory is just yet another government trick in fooling you that there are no Martians!! Next they'll reiterate there's no giant face sculpture on Mars. :(

    1. Re:Noooo by the_weasel · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, we just replaced the batteries. I have to get back to the set now, one of the rovers needs to be prepped for the next shot. We are taping the discovery of a new form of sand ridge, and I need to load the film.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    2. Re:Noooo by NaCl · · Score: 2, Funny

      there's no giant face sculpture on Mars. :(

      It's more like :-|

      --
      I shot the sheriff
  5. Just thought of one. by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Vibration from movement: is there enough jostle to shake dust off the panels from mere rover movement about the surface or is that too small to matter here?

    1. Re:Just thought of one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Overnight? While parked and sleeping?

  6. Windsock by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will the next batch of rovers be equipped with windsocks, to measure the direction of the wind?

    And what do you call those spinning things to measure airspeed? The ones with four arms with little hemispheric "cups" that catch the wind. KnowwhatImeanVerne?

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    1. Re:Windsock by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pathfinder had something I liked to call the wind chimes. They didn't move about much, I'm guessing because that lander was so close to the ground and the landscape was quite rocky.

      Here's an animation here and some info.

    2. Re:Windsock by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny
      Will the next batch of rovers be equipped with windsocks,

      I'm just hoping they'll be equipped with a Winsock, so they can run nifty TCP/IP apps like Mosaic and WS-FTP, and maybe even a web server like ZBServer!

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  7. Re:pre-emptive strike against all the teraformers. by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny
    What if the sun goes super nova?

    I don't think that terraforming Mars would help here.

  8. Spirit power boost by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The link talks about Opportunity's power boost, but a few days ago Spirit also had the same thing happen to it.
    Quite amazing stuff, if this keeps up the rovers should last a very long time!

  9. Re:pre-emptive strike against all the teraformers. by lasindi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a long time, I've believed that for Humanity to survive, we *MUST* have colonies on more than just Earth. We have the technology to kill everything on this planet in minutes, and it takes a mistake by one person to start that chain of events. Maybe through our own greed and industrialization, we've already set the earth on a fatal spiral through pollution. There are also other events that can happen, which are on more of a sci-fi scale. What if the sun goes super nova? What if a giant asteroid crashes into the earth?

    I'm all for spreading colonies, but your last two examples are a little more realistic than "sci-fi." We know that the sun's going to die; it'll take 4.5 billion years, but it will definitely happen. And a large asteroid will almost certainly strike the Earth. One killed the dinosaurs, and that was only 65 million years ago (a blink of an eye in the history of the Earth).

    lasindi

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
  10. KnowwhatImeanVerne? Re:Windsock by templest · · Score: 3, Funny
    And what do you call those spinning things to measure airspeed? The ones with four arms with little hemispheric "cups" that catch the wind. KnowwhatImeanVerne?

    A Science Vessel?
    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  11. Who made the dust devils? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's easy TAS the devil is on holiday, got a ride with duck dodgers and presto, thats why they are called dust "devils"

  12. Troll alert - mod down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Hidden" movie spoilers from ROTS in the text.

    1. Re:Troll alert - mod down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here it is without the spoilers (I don't give a shit about Star Wars, so don't bother thanking me for picking them out):

      --

      NASA is somewhat concerned about Martian dust devils and it's impact on future human missions to Mars. There have been at least two expeditions to the Arizona desert by NASA people to study dust devils, both run out of the University of Arizona. I had the opportunity to spend a month in the Arizona desert gathering data on the second trip.

      I wouldn't say that NASA is particularly concerned about dust devils -- due to the lower gravity, dust devils on mars would be much weaker than those on earth, even if they are larger. Even on earth, dust devils post little threat. Some of the ones we studied were over 2 miles tall, and you could walk right through them with absolutely no danger. While the original trip was sponsored by the HEDS funded Matador experiment to see if the dust devils posed any danger to human exploration, the primary concerns were over static electricity and dust getting into space suits.

      What NASA is really interested in is how dust affect the geology of the planet. In the absense of water or strong winds, dust devils may in fact be the primary erosive force on Mars. During the first half of the 20th century, astronomers noticed that Mars changed color depending on the season, and this led them to beleive that there was rich vegetation on Mars. When the first orbiters and lander arrived, we learned that this wasn't quite true, but we still had no other solution. Now, scientists believe that is was dust devils, which are a seasonal occurance, that were actually reconfiguring the landscape of the planet. We have actually seen pictures of light colored planes that are crisscrossed by dark dust devil trails.

      The problem is that very little is known about dust devils on Earth. I only know of one scientific paper published on the subject. While some of the work we did was trying to find out the proerties of dust devils, especially the electrostatic properties, to help create an accurate model for their formation on Mars, this was not really why we were there. The primary goal of the NASA researchers was to study the dust devils on earth in order to learn how to study them on Mars. We were mainly out there to test a set of instruments planned for Matador (including some far out stuff, like using a special UV camera to detect sparks caused by static electricity).

  13. Re:pre-emptive strike against all the teraformers. by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To make the atomsphere more earth like, we'd probably send some plants over, such as algae, and maybe grasses. As it grows, it may cover artifacts that could be interesting.

    We can't get grasses to grow in Tuscon, let alone Valles Marineris. Even terran algae would have a tough time of it, with so little CO2 and sunlight. So I don't think there's much danger of them obscuring the geography, and even less chance of them covering up any artifacts... since it's already pretty clear that there was never any civilisation capable of creating any artifacts.

    Mars is just a huge rock, with some water and vapors clinging to it. An astonishingly fascinating rock, but still just a rock. If we ever undertake terraforming it, that will be so far enough in the future that I think we'll have a pretty good opportunity between now and then to give that big rock a good studying... long enough to make an informed judgment of whether to proceed with Project Genesis or not. Worrying about the introduction of interplanetary kudzu at this point is a bit premature.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  14. Re:pre-emptive strike against all the teraformers. by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny
    "What if the sun goes super nova?"

    I don't think that terraforming Mars would help here.

    Right. We'd be so preoccupied rewriting all the books about stellar physics to explain how it's possible for our star to go supernova, that we wouldn't have time to move everyone from the "atomize" zone (Earth's orbit) to the "atomize a few minutes later" zone (Mars' orbit).

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  15. frost already observed in 1979 by Viking by idlake · · Score: 2, Informative

    Frost on Mars had already been observed by Viking in 1979 (e.g., here).

  16. Gee, thanks a lot plagarist by ahecht · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why anyone would go to the trouble of digging up my http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=98777& cid=8427936year old post on dust devils and then insert Star Wars spoilers into it is completely beyond me. Bonus points for remembering my post, but several thousand negative points for the plagarism and spoilers.

  17. Re:Would these be good areas for missions? by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It doesn't seem like a good thing to count on. In Spirit's case, it was over 400 days into the mission before it got this boost. They've been dealing with decreased energy availability for months. Plus, they estimated the odds were about equally as likely that some other critical part of the rover would fail before the solar panels became obscured. They will, however, probably reconsider their estimates for how long a solar powered rover can operate. The Sojourner lasted about 90 days, so they figured with the increased panel area, they could probably double that.

    The next rover mission (Mars Surface Laboratory) will probably be nuclear powered so they can guarantee energy degradation won't be a problem unless it survives for quite a few years. This would also mean they aren't limited to locations near the equator, so if NASA decides there's something interesting near the poles, they can go there. Since the landing method will be different, the rover will be able to land in an area about 1/5 the size of the current rovers. This should give the mission planners a lot more options than they had with the twin Spirit and Opportunity, which landed on a big empty plain and on the floor of a giant, ancient crater respectively.

  18. Here ya go by zogger · · Score: 4, Informative
    composition

    95.3% carbon dioxide (CO2),

    2.7% nitrogen (N2),

    1.6% argon (Ar),

    0.15% oxygen (O2),

    0.03% water vapor (H2O)



    pressure

    1-9 millibars, depending on altitude; average 7 mb



    A little shy on the O2 department without a lot of terraforming action, pressure pretty low too, in short, no walking around without a spacesuit of some kind. It would seem possible though, given a large enough power source, you could run oxygen accumulators for inside use in your structures, etc..


    taken from http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/M/Marsat mos.html

  19. Compared to Earth's Atmosphere by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 2, Informative

    The standard atmosphere surface pressure on earth is 1013.23 millibars (mb), or 29.92 inches of mercury.

    A record High Pressure in Siberia made it up to 1083.8 mb/32.01 inches, and a Pacific Typhoon had a record low pressure of 879 mb/25.69 inches of mercury.

    So, compared to Earth by altitude (approximately):
    5,000 feet - 850 mb, 1 mile high 10,000 ft - 700 mb, 2 miles Oxygen required for unpressurized aircraft 18,000 ft - 500 mb (half the atmosphere is above/below this level), 3 miles 30,000 ft - 300 mb (70% of atmosphere is below), 6 miles high, entering the Stratosphere Dead Zone: Fatal without 100% oxygen source 53,000 ft - 100 mb (90% below, 10 miles, Stratosphere Fatal without Pressure suit: Blood pressure exceedes environment pressure, so oxygen is not absorbed Blood starts to outgas (boil) causing the Bends 68,000 ft - 50 mb (95%) 13 miles 102,000 ft - 10 mb (99%) 20 miles 104,000 ft - 9 mb High pressure on Mars 110,000 ft - 7 mb Average Mars pressure, 24 miles aloft on Earth 120,000 ft - 5 mb (99.5%) Higher terrain Mars pressure 157,000 ft - 1 mb (99.9%) Mars mountain tops, 30 miles on Earth Oh, yes - Earth has 78% Nitrogen, 21% Oxygen, 1% Argon, Carbon Dioxide, and all that. Water vapor can be up to 4% or so on hot, humid days.

    In other words, Mars Tourists will need to pack much more than a towel and sunscreen.

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.