The Register Finds Fault In Turion Benchmark Setup
An anonymous reader submits "From The Register, it appears that AMD has joined Intel, ATI, nVidia, and just about every other hardware manufacturer on the planet in benchmark fiddling. The benchmarks for the Turion appear to have been compared using quite different systems - a 35 watt Turion 64 with an ATI GPU versus a 25 watt Pentium M with an Intel integrated graphics processor. Sadly, it appears the original benchmarks were too good to be true."
AMD is perfect. Nothing to see here. Please move along.
Soon we will have benchmark woodwinds, benchmark flutes, and worst of all benchmark trumpets. Off course it will come together as all that benchmark jazz. . .
*Hugs his Pentium 4*
bloodclotjungletekno
In other news, I think oranges taste much better than apples.
The Dude abides.
Oddly, the register article reads like an opinion piece
:-)
That's because it's a online tabloid.
1st, why is AMD naming operating techniques with that 'n' in there (so far as I know, there's cool'n'quiet and thin'n'light)?
McDonald's has a sandwich called the big'n'tasty. Does this mean that I will soon be able to get my McAthlon with fries (and greasy thermal paste on top)?
I don't know about you, but I think the future will taste delicious!
Secondly, (and more seriously) does this question the validity of the performance their other products, such as athlon64? Or have those other lines of products so far been tested true?
It makes me concerned because I was dumb enough to spend more money than I should've on an athlon64 3400+ (I should've waited until the price dropped. But, I really wanted it!)
In any case, I still prefer athlons over pentiums.
Dear sir,
There's no such thing as negative publicity.
Signed,
AMD Publicist.
Yeah, I too am sick of those goddamn driver writers making my games run faster. Fuckers.