Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches Google Code

ibjhb writes "Google is at it again and has launched Google Code. It appears to be "Google's place for Open Source software". " Can't say that I'm surprised that our old friend (and former Slashdot Author) Chris DiBona is working on this one. They have links to several open source projects, as well as to Google API information.

45 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. uh oh by peculiarmethod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Freshmeat just got a 'best if used by' date.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:uh oh by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      not exactly freshmeat..

      **What is code.google.com?
      Code.google.com is our site for external developers interested in Google-related development. It's where we'll publish free source code and lists of our API services.**

      besides than that.. *Why are you releasing code through Sourceforge?
      Well, because they were nice enough to oblige, and because developers here like Sourceforge. Future homes for new projects might include Tigris.org or language specific sites like the Vaults of Parnassus and CPAN. *

      yeah. ALL THE PROJECTS ARE ON SOURCEFORGE!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:uh oh by Curtman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      yeah. ALL THE PROJECTS ARE ON SOURCEFORGE!

      Good point. Because Sourceforge, Freshmeat, and Slashdot are all OSTG pages. This is nice to see Google taking an interest in OSTG, not competing with it.

    3. Re:uh oh by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

      What happens when they open Googledot.org ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:uh oh by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

      We won't have as many duped posts? Articles and links will be checked before they're posted? Grievous spelling errors will be corrected in the editing process? There will actually be an editing process?

      On the other hand, there will still be a Cowboy Neal Option in the polls.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:uh oh by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Goddamn, I nailed that one

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  2. Nice by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 5, Informative

    It looks like rather than try to reinvent the wheel, they are utilizing SourceForge for hosting their code. It's nice to see that they aren't suffering from "Not Invented Here" syndrome.

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
  3. code.google.com FAQ by e03179 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google Code FAQ: http://code.google.com/faq.html/

    Code.google.com is our site for external developers interested in Google-related development. It's where we'll publish free source code and lists of our API services. A lot of people worked together to both prepare source code for release and prepare code.google.com for launch and ongoing maintenance. We really care about free and open source software (F/OSS) at Google, and this site is one aspect of that affection.

    Read the rest of the FAQ: http://code.google.com/faq.html/

    --
    -516
    1. Re:code.google.com FAQ by Infinityis · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:code.google.com FAQ by filmmaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cultural significance of Google's position on F/OSS software is their ace in the hole against Yahoo and MSN. That's not to say the technology needs a hidden ace, but only that the geek appeal toward Google will remain strong if they continue to "don't be evil," the highest manifestation of that being their willingness to share code.

  4. Sourceforge by aftk2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I first read the article blurb, I thought it meant Google was announcing some sort of source code repository, like SourceForge. Instead, it's a listing of their various open source projects.

    That's cool, certainly, but nothing terribly exciting. Isn't this stuff that's already been floating around on the Google website? Or is this a quick-and-dirty attempt to match developer.yahoo.com, which still looks to be more capable.

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    1. Re:Sourceforge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      coredumper: Gives you the ability to dump cores from programs when it was previously not possible.

      That's pretty much the opposite of the problem I usually have.

  5. Re:Bad title by otisaardvark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmmm... I was hoping it would be Google helping you search through Sourceforge and other open repositories in a more directed way... improved code search tools would be great, but this isn't bad!

  6. Google by Enjoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    What next?

    Google Personals?
    Google Quotes Database?
    Google Car Insurance?

    1. Re:Google by RangerRick98 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Google Car Insurance?

      Google can help you search billions of pages on the Internet, but it won't save you any money on car insurance.

      Geico.

      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
  7. Google and 20% time by nathan+s · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the FAQ:

    You may have heard about 20% time, in which Google engineers are encouraged to work on a personal project one day out of the week. Open Source interests a lot of Google developers, so we thought taking advantage of this program was a good way to prepare code for release and maintenance.

    People at Google keep saying that they get ~20% time to work on personal projects. I'm curious about a couple of things here.

    • Does this 20% time come out of the normal 40hr/week thing (and for that matter, do these engineers work 40/week or are they doing 100/week and get 20% time out of that)?
    • Does Google or the developer own intellectual property developed out of that 20% time?
    1. Re:Google and 20% time by digidave · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Does this 20% time come out of the normal 40hr/week thing (and for that matter, do these engineers work 40/week or are they doing 100/week and get 20% time out of that)?"

      It's one day a week, so that's 20% of working days, not hours.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:Google and 20% time by arkanes · · Score: 4, Informative

      As I understand it, it's one day a week and Google owns the IP. It's basically like free play in kindergarden.

    3. Re:Google and 20% time by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In that case, though, who would ever want to work on personal projects there? I know I certainly wouldn't.

      I think you're missing the point of these personal projects. The point is to allow employees some freedom in what they do for the company, not to pay them to work on their hobbies. Google's goal is to allow the employees freedom to explore interesting ideas in the hope that some of those ideas may ultimately turn into things that will make money for Google. All of the work in question is on Google time, and belongs to Google, the only difference is that one day per week the employees get to pick what they want to work on rather than just doing what they're told.

      This is a scaled-back version of the approach taken by the best pure R&D labs: Hire very smart people and then don't give them any specific assignments beyond "Do something new and interesting."

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Google and 20% time by Hyperspac · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a scaled-back version of the approach taken by the best pure R&D labs: Hire very smart people and then don't give them any specific assignments beyond "Do something new and interesting."

      Given the large number of major thing discovered by pure accident . Maybe you would be better off hiring a bunch of incompetent idiots and carefully watching what happens when you tell them do something difficult.

  8. coredumper by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 5, Funny

    coredumper: Gives you the ability to dump cores from programs when it was previously not possible.

    Gee, I've always been pretty good at that!

  9. Slashdot author is helping run it? by Jailbrekr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I guess we'll be seeing alot of duplicate projects posted there.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
  10. Oh man, that's good... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hadn't seen a Google story in a couple of days, I was starting to suffer withdrawal.

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  11. Re:Well done, Chris! by ghoti · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't know he was CowboyNeal!

    --
    EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
  12. Commercialization to come? by manmanic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This (along with the Yahoo API and Microsoft's promise to do the same) is good news for developers who are taking search APIs seriously.

    But who will be the first to throw open the floodgates and actuallly provide unlimited API querying at a price? Businesses (such as (plagiarism detection), (rank tracking) and (advanced alerting) are starting to be built out of this stuff, so there's obviously a genuine economy out there for the taking.

  13. Re:Up next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Close... Up next on Slashdot!
    • Apple!
    • Google!
    • Google!
    • Apple!
    • Google! (dupe)
    • Anime!
    • iPod/Google integration!
    • Googling anime! (dupe)
    • Microsoft announces minor security hole, Slashdot predicts end of the Internets!
  14. Interesting observation. by topside420 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Nice to see the three open source projects linked on the right are all projects that list chrisd as a developer.

    What a coincidence!

    1. Re:Interesting observation. by chrisd · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's because I want to see how things go in all the projects. Believe me when I tell you that it's not the Chris DiBona show. No one would watch... Chris DiBona

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  15. Re:In other News! by thirteenVA · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, slashdot announces new moderation level. '-1 Only funny the first time you hear it'

  16. Google Too by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Using the Google API is the best way to encourage its growth. The more apps that use it, the more those apps become "Google" - and the more Google will grow itself by growing its web services.

    However, hosting all those Google API apps solely on Google is a bad move. Too many eggs in one basket. Better to host them on both Google AND Freshmeat/SourceForge. In fact, one great Google API app would be an automirror. Hosting at one is automirrored at the other. Which has immediate benefits in load balancing and uptime (no single point of failure). And longterm benefits of keeping the code free of capricious corporate decisions down the road

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  17. Re:In other News! by Liselle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember complaining for months that /. didn't even have an icon for Google. Now I wish they'd make google.slashdot.org and get this stuff off the front page. Maybe take the place of Apache, which has had a grand total of one article in all of 2005.

    --
    Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
  18. Good Show! by polyp2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is great that Google are visibly supporting the development of open source software - to whatever degree.

    The ubiquity of google and the respect they have gained over the years make them somewhat of a model company. While im sure there may be a couple of people who might dispute their company motto to "not be evil" I think most people would agree that google seems to be doing things the right way.

    Google is well thought of by anyone who uses the web, not just geeks, but the PHB's and Grandma's alike. This brings me to the next point...

    Google have got Microsoft worried - frustrated that they couldnt "own" google they paid google the greatest compliment- they redesigned their search engine that is functionally more than just similar to google - and to a certain extent the low graphic - no-frills feel!

    It is interesting to see Google innovating and re-thinking many of the ways we use the web. Now that google are being visibly more active in open source - It couldnt be better press for F/OSS at this time - and damn that's really going to p*ss Microsoft off - I'd like to see them match this idea. In addition to this its certainly going to help to legitimise F/OSS to those PHB's who have been toying with the idea but afraid to test the water.

    Its going to be extremely interesting to see what google has deep in the bowels of its R&D department waiting to come into fruition. Lets hope that they can keep their face clean in the process!

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  19. My favorite is perftools by GoogleGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can see code that Google is opening up here. My favorite is the perftools code because it helps with things like heap profiling. Very handy stuff, and it's hosted with Sourceforge. I'm pretty sure these four projects were just added in the last day or so.

  20. Re:Bad title by Dolda2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Are you referring to adding "site:sourceforge.net" to your search terms, like this?

  21. I well code for a free t-shirt by grusapa · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We're going to feature a new one every week or so and we'll send a fabulous, always fashionable, t-shirt to the maintainers as a small way of saying thank you!" anyone seen the pic. where a dud is holdig a poster that say "I well do html for food"

  22. Re:Bad title by otisaardvark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No. I was referring to tools specially adapted to searching through code itself.

  23. UI by Morgahastu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is that anything related to Open Source has to have a terrible interface? This is only google page I do not like and it looks like it skipped the UI team.

  24. Updates Blog by epohs · · Score: 3, Interesting
    http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/

    The code.google.com update blog, and an easy way to subscribe to the RSS feed with Firefox

  25. Pity, I had hoped for a specialized search by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I've been hoping for is a specialization of Google that would search for open source code and commentary/documentation on same.

    So many projects have names that tend to return a lot of unrelated links when doing a search, it would be nice is there were a categorized search similar to that which they've created for Linux (NICE! Helps significantly. I've given it a browser link on my toolbar.).

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  26. Uh oh indeed! by Seoulstriker · · Score: 4, Funny
    Registrant:
    Google Inc. (DOM-258879)
    2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 US

    Domain Name: googledot.org

    Registrar Name: Alldomains.com
    Registrar Whois: whois.alldomains.com
    Registrar Homepage: http://www.alldomains.com/

    Administrative Contact:
    DNS Admin (NIC-1340142) Google Inc.
    2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 US
    dns-admin@googledot.org +1.6503300100 Fax- +1.6506181499
    Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
    DNS Admin (NIC-1340144) Google Inc.
    2400 E. Bayshore Pkwy Mountain View CA 94043 US
    dns-admin@googledot.org +1.6503300100 Fax- +1.6506181499

    Created on..............: 2005-Mar-15.
    Expires on..............: 2019-Sep-14.
    Record last updated on..: 2005-Mar-17 10:42:46.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS3.GOOGLEDOT.ORG 216.239.36.10
    NS4.GOOGLEDOT.ORG 216.239.38.10
    NS1.GOOGLEDOT.ORG 216.239.32.10
    NS2.GOOGLEDOT.ORG 216.239.34.10


    Uh oh...
    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
  27. Not invented here by Qwavel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Several people have commented that it is nice to see Google using an existing code site (sf) rather than create their own.

    I'm also glad to see that they are using an existing and respected license (BSD 2.0) rather than invent their own. The other big companies (eg. Sun, MS) always have to create their own pseudo-FLOSS licenses when they release code, with their own little catches and gotchas.

  28. Re:Bad title by The+boojum · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't forget that there's already Google Linux and Google BSD. Not quite what you're asking for, but a little closer.

    And Google Labs has Google Personalized Search where you can flag open source as a topic of interest.

  29. Re:Well done, Chris! by chrisd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thanks Russ!

    --
    Co-Editor, Open Sources
    Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  30. Yellow Stickies by hawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe that it is/was 3 hours/week at 3M.

    An engineer wanted something to mark pages in choir books at church. He found an adhesive that they'd previously dismissed as too weak to be useful, diluted it further, and now we don't have to paint our monitors and walls . . .

    hawk

  31. Uh Oh, Another DiBona Project by Jack+Auf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why is it that people think this guy is great? He typically does NOT do a good or even acceptable job on anything he manages.

    Chris DiBona is *the* guy that single-handedly killed themes.org.

    For those of you who have not been around long enough to remember themes.org it was a wonderful, one-stop-shop for themes for everything. Until Chris took over that is, and then it went into a year and a half long dormant period where no updates were allowed by themers, only to eventually be folded into freshmeat when it was apparent that Chris was never going to deliver.

    How the hell did he ever get hired by Google?

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF