Slashdot Mirror


Grafedia Elevates Graffiti To Art

joredbar writes "Wired.com has a story about a new phenomenon called Grafedia. This is something new that I never heard of before. Grafedia is hyperlinked text, written by hand onto physical surfaces and linking to rich media content - images, video, sound files, and so forth. Grafedia can be written in letters or postcards, on the body as tattoos, on the street, or anywhere you feel like putting it. Viewers 'click' on these Grafedia hyperlinks with their cell phones by sending a message addressed to the word + "@grafedia.net" to get the content behind the link."

39 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like Garffiti for Metro lamers.

  2. What does Grafedia get out of this? by Kittyflipping · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmmm, now what would you do with a database of SMS-enabled cell phone numbers? Is it illegal to SMS ads to cell phones? What about if they SMS you first?

  3. except for tatoos by anagama · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems like an interesting idea, but imagine 40 years from now having to explain the grafedia link tatoo. That doesn't sound to brilliant.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:except for tatoos by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Seems like an interesting idea, but imagine 40 years from now having to explain the grafedia link tatoo. That doesn't sound to brilliant."

      "Daddy, what does 'goatse' mean?"

  4. Pr0n? by skriptal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will I be able to use this to get pr0n though?

  5. it's a new dating service! by icebrrrg · · Score: 3, Funny

    this totally supercedes festooning the bathroom walls with the phone numbers of the girls who won't date me.

    --
    nothing worth possessing isn't possessed. or something.
  6. Oh, god by bonch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Way too much potential for tubgirl/goatse abuse here. I can imagine the horrors as the morning commuters follow a "hyperlink" to a giant, stretched rectum to start their week.

  7. No content... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is this any different from scrawling an URL? This is going to be used by a few lame advertising campaigns, where every graphedia will have to be acompanied by instructions 'put this word in front of @graphedia.net'.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  8. No thanks, I see enough advertising already by Damek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like an effort to create a new "hip" advertising trend.

    No thanks.

  9. This is not a "hyperlink"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This idea has been around for ages. They're called URLs. I can spray paint "slashdot.org" on a wall and you can "link" to that by typing in that address on your cell phone. Doesn't make it a hyperlink. If I gave someone my business card with an email address on it and said "look, my business card has hyperlinks!" they'd think I'm nuts. Much like I think the perpetrator of this ridiculous idea is.

    1. Re:This is not a "hyperlink"... by nilbog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you don't get it. You see this is different because when users enter a grafedia address they call it "clicking" on the image. You don't call typing in URLs "clicking" so your idea is not innovative at all. Sorry.

      --
      or else!
  10. MY GOD ITS BRILLIANT by popo · · Score: 4, Funny


    In the name of all that's holy... what mad science is THIS?!

    He's actually HAND WRITING urls onto (sit down) PHYSICAL ... SURFACES...

    URLS...

    PHYSICAL SURFACES...

    Its MAD! No... its more than mad.

    ITS I N S A N E !!!!

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  11. Re:Oh Not Another Useless Fad by Buffo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gotta agree; pointless... At least with old fashioned graffiti there was a slim chance that you could view something that was visually pleasing while you contemplated the fact that what you are looking at is basically an act of vandalism.

    Now all you get is a word, or a link, that is still an act of valdalism. But there's really nothing to look at. You've got to go look up the actual content using your cell phone, and then it might be something really lame - or worse, a goatse link.

    What's the point? How many people are going to take the creator's word that the relevent link will be pleasing/funny/informative/(insert adjective here)? Especially after the first penis-enlargement Grafedia works start showing up. (Hey spammers! Here's a new delivery method for you! Get your victims, er - customers, to actually come to you for a change!)

  12. Semacode by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This has already been tried in the form of Semacode. Much less of a pain in the ass than using a cell keypad to type in the 'link.'

    Besides, they want me to effectively pay to read graffiti (in the form of picture messaging charges)? I knew the whole IP situation was kinda getting out of hand, but damn!

  13. great by Stalyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    now the local street gang can inform me on how i can enlarge my penis or how their funds are tied up in some bank and they need my help... spam bangers!

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  14. Graffiti is art anyway by fliplap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know that graffiti has been art for a long time right?

  15. 'elevates'? by DNAspark99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how does this crappy idea 'elevate' the art?

    As an occasional writer(graffiti artist), I take offence to that.

    http://www.visualorgasm.com/

    --

    --
    Society has traditionally always tried to find scapegoats for its problems. Well, here I am.
  16. I'm sorry... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But this is stupid and definitely non-news.

    Sounds like someone is using Slashdot to get some free press.

  17. "Elevates" ? by popo · · Score: 4, Insightful


    "Elevates grafitti to art" ???

    The implication is the "art" is somehow "higher" than anything else is silly.

    Anyone who has studied art philosophy (I majored) can tell you that art has no standards or prerequisites. Anyone can declare anything to be art. (Duchamp anyone?)

    You can literally shit on a canvas and call it art. In fact you don't even need the canvas.

    Grafitti *is* art.

    And for that matter so is Slashdot.

    If anything, art is "low" -- most other things have defining parameters.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  18. dumbest. headline. ever. by Heisenbug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, I shouldn't fall for the troll, but the idea that writing shorthand URLs on walls is art, but non-web-enabled graffiti isn't, is purely laughable. I browse at +3 so I won't have to see things that transparently stupid.

    I liked the article, just not the headline. The idea sounds like a fun experiment, though I can't see it scaling well enough to be worth trying '@grafedia.blah' when you see a random word written on a wall.

    The next question that's going to come up, of course, is if graffiti is in fact art already. Heh. I've already had the conversation where we talk about whether something is art or not. They're all the same, and I'm over it. For me it's enough to say, some graffiti seems lame, some makes me happy and I'm glad it's there. I recognize that y'all may disagree, and all I can say is, there's a city full of walls you can post complaints at.

  19. Anyone want to help? by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was kind of curious about how quickly a wikipedia article could be taken from nothing up to something interesting, so please pop on over to the Grafedia Wikipedia article and contribute if you have anthing.

    I just started the crazy thing. I wonder how this will go.

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
  20. Re:um, no by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a bunch of pricks trying to pretend they are intelligent...

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
  21. WOW GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to see the hundreds of grafiti links to http://www.goat.se

  22. Re:Hmm by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

    graffiti = crap

    then again modern art = crap, so i suppose it does mean that graffiti = art.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  23. Re:um, no by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i thought the opposite, it reminded me of the kind of things some of my stoner friends would think up... "what if you could click on links i real life.... like on a web page.... but in real life......yea man you could click on it with your phone or something...." but the next day rather than realizing it was dumb they decided to actually do it.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  24. Very interesting... by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could be very intriguing if used properly.

    More importantly, it raises the question (to me): Why do we have extensions/suffixes on domain names?

    The reason I ask is because an apparently new medium of creativity has surfaced. When I read this article, I felt it was blemished by the ".net" that's intrinsically (and permanently) associated with it. In a world where we can put men on the moon, machines on Mars, and use international language/symbols on the internet; why do we still have to have 90's style suffixes appended to internet names?

    Do we gain any significant taxonomy by having .net/.com/.uk/etc?

    In the new global economy/world, I can't help but think that a better method of taxonomy should be created; and if it isn't, at least the existing obsolete method should be eradicated.

    That said, I think graffedia is (or will become) a much more significant historical milestone than many people realize.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  25. Re:Hmm by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Funny

    DON'T DO IT.

    Tubgirl.

    You have been warned twice.

    nothing from gnaa@grafedia.net though, suprisingly.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  26. Elevated to Art? by pjay_dml · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where have you been the past couple of centuries?

    GRAFFITI IS ART!!!

    Also called Writing, Street Art, just to name a few terms, so that idiots like you, stop degrading us artists!!!

  27. Two things that come to mind... by nunchux · · Score: 2, Informative

    You want to see graffiti art, look at Basquiat, Haring or Fab Five Freddy. Even with the loosest parameters of what "art" is, this ain't it. This is the modern equivalent of a "for a good time, call xxx-xxxx" message scrawled on a bathroom wall.

  28. Re:Hmm by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They replace a picture with a hyperlink to the picture and this elevates it to art?

    A big spraypainted mural on the side of a run down building is graffiti elevated to art. This is more like sinking to the level of a phone number in a bathroom stall.

    I feel stupider for having been exposed to this idiocy.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  29. Hyperlinks by mcc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well that's silly. Those aren't hyperlinks. They're just printed URLs that happen to have been written by hand. This is about as innovative as a cuecat, and isn't at all new-- the one time I was in Cleveland, like four years ago, I could see from the rail system that someone or other had written out the full URL to the mp3.com account for their hip hop group on the backside of a tunnel support, facing where the trains go by.

    If you want ACTUAL examples of semantic-web style hyperlinking in Graffiti, go to Houston. I'm still some of it is still there.

    A few years ago, I think over the summer, someone went and drew a whole bunch of graffiti in the area around Rice University. At least, that was where most of it that I saw was. All of the graffiti was the exact same thing; a little logo saying "GONE" in stylized cursive. The E in "GONE" would always trail off into a little arrow.

    The arrow pointed to the location of the next "GONE" logo.

    These were scattered, and the proximity varied. Some of them were quite a ways from each other, some of them seemed to be following a road, some didn't. The only one I remember the specific location of was that there was one on this electrical transformer box on the Main Street side of Rice. But if you found one of these and followed the arrows, it would pick out for you this meandering path through south Houston.

    I have no idea where the path lead.

  30. View them in a browser by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems you can see all/some/? images without sending email by going to:

    http://www.grafedia.net/images/grafedias/[word]. jp g

    For example, slashdot.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  31. That site has problems by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Grafedia.net has some serious bugs in it's code and I'd be surprised if it didn't go down after getting hit by Slashdot and have all the uploaded images get wiped. Some I've noticed:

    Some words just don't work and images get shown as broken links; often the upload wouldn't take.

    In process of uploading an image, if you hit your Back button at the Accept/Reject screen, it locks the word as if it were already used when it's not.

    Random "division by zero" PHP errors.

    More random PHP errors of just about every flavor.

    Some email arrives with such mangled headers that Yahoo Mail can't even open the message, shows it as garbage.

    Slashdot's entry is too small to read easily (it says: "Hrumph, Slashdot. How do they always know?" then on the screen: "-5 Troll").

    Of course this could all be due to the server melting, but still :)

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  32. This is not art, it's data collection. by kiddailey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let me get this straight -- you send a text message to an e-mail address from your phone and a server somewhere sends you some crap, and also...
    • logs your phone number

    • matches your number with a record in a database the company bought from your cell phone provider

    • matches your personal information with your shopping habits from another database

    • begins sending you spam text messages and adds your number to every telephone solicitor's address book on the planet.

    Sorry, but no thanks.
  33. Tinyurl by JaF893 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is stupid - have people not heard of Tiny URL?

    It even supports mailto: as well as standard http links. I think using tinyurl to directly link to your content is better than having to send an email to some crappy site and then get a link to the content.

  34. Re:Art? by johannesg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    self expression is not obscene, and the only time you should be ashamed of someone else's message is when it speaks ill of you.

    I'm not at all opposed to self-expression, and shame has nothing to do with it. What I'm opposed to is the $4000 - $5000 that we have to spend to keep our building clean. Just for the record, I do not want to live inside somebody else's self-expression. I believe I should have that freedom, as a part-owner of the building.

    Would you agree to let me come to your house and spray paint in any location I choose (be it on your car, your windows, your dog, your music collection, or whatever)? Because I dearly want to express myself in such manner. I promise I won't write anything nasty about you.

    On a similar note: if I ever catch someone vandalizing my house I'll happily spray all the paint he carries over his clothes, his body and his vehicle, as an act of self-expression on my part.

  35. Japan has an answer for this that doesn't suck. by clambake · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So cell phones in Japan can take pictures of these little encoded diagrams. They are just blocks of black and white (new ones in color coming out this month) and when you take a picture of it, the phone processes the picture into a hyperlink and goes to the corresponding website. It shouldn't be too complex to get ACTUAL graphiti on the walls that you can take a picture of that will translate into websites (based on thier colors, some other image processing, etc.

  36. Yeah, there's a good idea. by jcuervo · · Score: 2

    Probably not the first to say this, but who the hell would get a tattoo of a URL?

    Three years later, "Hey, man, your tat 404'd".

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  37. Re:WARNING by Flamingcheeze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, no kidding... just like that stupid internet. I really liked it until I saw Tubgirl on it. ;P

    --
    The Philosophy of Liberty | lewrockwell.com