Slashdot Mirror


Book 'Em, Dano

theodp writes "An Oregon library worker was arrested after selling at least $10,000 worth of stolen library books, CDs and videotapes online in the past six months. The thief, who scanned the Net to find items in demand and went to the library to check them out, was busted after an alert college president noticed his copy of the recently-published I am Charlotte Simmons, purchased on Amazon.com, sported a library receipt with a due date of Dec. 26. Earlier this month, it was reported that a VT man was arrested for stealing hundreds of books from college libraries and bookstores and selling them on Amazon, realizing more than $4,000. The library thefts are somewhat ironic, since Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and the NY Times seemed to suggest there might be fewer books in libraries if the Authors Guild, who opposed Amazon's used book sales practices, had their way. Bezos also once told angry booksellers there's no reason why Amazon should have to collect sales taxes, arguing that Amazon gets no police services from other states."

150 comments

  1. dummer than a bag of hammers by mwilliamson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, this guy's a smart one... genious.

    1. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "genius", genius.

    2. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're lucky, maybe he's still selling a dictionary for 5$, then you can learn to spell genius like a human being. What is it with this "genious" spelling anyway? Are you Greek? Gee-nee-ooooooooooooooooooooouss?

    3. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by justforaday · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the British spelling, moran!

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    4. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "dumber", dummy.

    5. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by deggy · · Score: 1, Informative

      No it isnt - what the hell are you on about??

    6. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't get the humour in how he spelled... you're a true besserwisser.

    7. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's this thing called "humor" (or "humour" for you Brits). Dummer than a bag of hammers is right...

    8. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no humor in there, "genious" is a common misspelling, much like people using "populous" instead of "populace". And yes, I *do* know better, I speak three languages and have a 4.0 GPA.

    9. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      It's moron, moran. Get a brain!

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    10. Re:dummer than a bag of hammers by Nyder · · Score: 1

      yet you aren't smart enough to log in.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  2. Ebay is rampant with theves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To be honest, this sort of thing really grips my shit. Ebay is full of people doing this sort of thing - not what people might think of as 'stolen goods' but things they've borrowed from work or been issued and then flog on ebay.
    I'm in the military and every now and again do a search for Military kit, ebay is crawling with brand new stuff that could only have come from stores, so basicly someone is getting it issued, or taking a few bits home and then flogging them straight onto eBay to make a few extra dollars - it still amounts to the same thing.

    1. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by NewStarRising · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "not what people might think of as 'stolen goods' " ...

      just goods that do not belong to them, being sold with no intention of passing any of the sales price to the owner of the goods...

      ok, IANAL, but surely most people realise that taking something that is not yours, selling it and keeping the money is stealing?
      I agree that it may, in some people's eyes, be too small an infraction to be prosecuted for (one book, the odd army hat), but this does not mean it is not stealing.
      Epsecially if it is done with the express purpose of selling for personal profit.

      To be issued with an Army Hat and keep it at home for years, then think "Oh, they've probably written it off now, i don;t want it, I wonder if I can get a few $ for it on EBay?" is quite different from wandering into the Army Stores thinking "I wonder which items I can get most for on EBay? "

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    2. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by johannesg · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm in the military and every now and again do a search for Military kit, ebay is crawling with brand new stuff

      Ah-ha, so *that's* where that 2nd hand aircraft carrier came from!

    3. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by zotz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " "not what people might think of as 'stolen goods' " ..."

      "ok, IANAL, but surely most people realise that taking something that is not yours, selling it and keeping the money is stealing?"

      Perhaps what the poster was referring to was that the person doing the selling did not come into posession of the item in question by a means that would normally be looked at as stealing. Not that selling them doesn't amount to stealing them.

      I go to the library and check out a book and take it home and read it. At this point I am in posession of the book and it is not considered stolen.

      As opposed to I sneak the book out of the library and take it home and read it. At this point, I am in posession of the book and it is (isn't it?) considered stolen.

      Also as opposed to I break into the library at night and take the book home and read it. At this point, I am in posession of the book and it is considered stolen.

      In all three cases, when I sell the book, it is certainly "stolen" although the law can be funny and may have a different term for this type of misappropriation of the property of another. (Anyone know? I do not like to use the wrong terms in matters like this, especially by mistake or out of ignorance.)

      I took it to be that the poster was talking along these lines.

      all the best,

      drew

      http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A %22drew%20Roberts%22

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    4. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      I see your point.

      Yes, this is not the "usual" way of stealing, but at the point where he registered the book as returned, yet still kept it, I consider it stealing.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    5. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by zotz · · Score: 1

      "Yes, this is not the "usual" way of stealing, but at the point where he registered the book as returned, yet still kept it, I consider it stealing."

      Certainly, although like I say, there may actually be another legal term for this.

      I my country, I have heard the phrase: "stealing by reason of employment."

      Does anyone know what this relates to?

      all the best,

      drew

      http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A %22drew%20Roberts%22

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    6. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by Nyder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to be in the position where the library wouldn't let me check out books because they claimed I owed them $128 for overdue/non returned materials.
      Even though I tried to proved that I didn't check them out (from a library I never went to, during a time when I had lost my wallet). So I'd just take what I wanted, and return it later.
      sure, I was stealing them, but I was returning what I stolen after I was done with it.

      maybe I was in the wrong for doing that, but I felt I didn't have a choice, they wouldn't let me check anything out.

      What really pisseed me off, was I used to get new books, maybe I read them once, or didn't want them, I'd give them to the library. Then I found out they sell all the donations they give, and use that money to buy new books.
      How stupid is that? I give them a brand new book, they sell it for probably 1/4 or less of the price. Namely, Seattle Public librarys suck.

      and no, I no longer use them. I just download the books i want to read in ebook format, and read them on my PDA.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    7. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LAPL does the same thing. I no longer donate books to them. Last time, I donated a few cartons of kids books (my daughters outgrew them) to my local elementary school.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Ebay is rampant with theves by soul_cmd · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a library that had practices similar to this. The idea was that the reference librarians would first take a glance over what was being donated and keep what was worth keeping, and the rest that we already had too many copies of or was in a condition to make it not very useful, would go to the book sale for new books. There's only one real flaw with this plan: Reference librarians are usually busy with half a dozen other projects, and this stack of books that piles high (and I worked at a smaller local library) becomes quite a pain to keep on top of. So not everything winds up being accounted for and actually looked over. More goes out to the sale than should. We did have a second line of defence, volunteers whose sole purpose was to run that sale. But, usually their perogative was to pull the books in 'good condition' or potentially 'in-demand' and to put them in a higher priced section. But the resources are usually not there for a public library to really keep on top of the hundreds of donations they get. It wouldn't surprise me to hear that one of the public libraries mentioned above got near a thousand or more books donated a day. Frankly, that's pretty low priority too. The primary job of a library is to provide services in this day and age. Ususally information services, or reference services. Not to dig through the plethora of books donated in a day.

  3. Theft? In VT? Say it ain't so! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a part time resident of VT the past 5 years (the majority of the fall/winter), I can't say this surprises me. Norwich is about 10 miles away and is a military oriented university. I wonder what titles he was pulling out? Anyways, this is just another creative theft of product/services. Contrary to many popular beliefs, Vermont is not the idllyic paradise many would have you believe. High welfare rates, little job growth, few police and much unreported crime. I'll give that this guy was more creative than most, but he is still the typical dirtbag.

    1. Re:Theft? In VT? Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to many popular beliefs, Vermont is not the idllyic paradise many would have you believe. High welfare rates, little job growth, few police and much unreported crime.

      Free handouts, no crummy backbreaking work, anarchy, free poontang.

      You, sir, are the master of sarcasm.

    2. Re:Theft? In VT? Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a guess, but I think VT may refer to Viginia Tech in this case. Can anyone confirm? Vermont was the place I thought of first, but then they went on to mention the 'university library'.

    3. Re:Theft? In VT? Say it ain't so! by Sean+the+Impaler · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa...stop with the VT bashing.

      The truth is, Vermont really is paradise, but we only project things such as high welfare rates, little job growth, unreported crime, etc. to keep those damn flatlanders out of our state.

      Since I've been a VT resident my whole life, I've seen the state before it became the welfare-ridden, high-crime (relatively speaking), place that it is today, but until all the flatlanders move out of Burlington, we'll keep up this white trash facade!!!

      --
      Sig? No thanks, I'm trying to quit.
  4. Was this really illegel? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is this really an arrest its legal to make? When signing up to library you agree if you dont return book you pay for it so you might borrow something from library worth $20 to library but find a buyer online who will pay $250 for it.

    Well library rules say you pay $20 to library so what is the problem? If youve paid for it you can do what you like with it the library shouldnt have any say over it then.

    This is like RIAA when they say they get to control how you use music when they sell it to you but still control what you can do with it, or so they think

    1. Re:Was this really illegel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      Well library rules say you pay $20 to library so what is the problem?
      Because you are not paying the library money in exchange for a book. You are paying a fee for not having returning the book. It's what you agree to when you sign up.

      Your argument is a little like saying that when you order two burritos, then eat one but leave the other on the table, you're entitled to a 50% refund.
    2. Re:Was this really illegel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a moron.

    3. Re:Was this really illegel? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1

      > Because you are not paying the library money in exchange for
      > a book. You are paying a fee for not having returning the
      > book. It's what you agree to when you sign up.

      OK I have on my bookcase two books that I failed to return to a library many years ago. I have alreaddy paid the late fines and "fail to return" fines on them and all is closed between me and the library

      Are you saying I do not own these books? will I be arrested for trying to sell them on to someone else? Will I get the library police coming after me if I try to sell them? I don't think so.

    4. Re:Was this really illegel? by jonbryce · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not what happened in this case though.

      Here, he made use of his employee access to the library computer system to say that the book had been returned, when it had not been.

      Secondly, I don't think he sold them on Amazon for more than the list price. These are current, in print books that you can get from a bookstore anywhere, including Amazon's new books section.

      I would say this is a clear cut case of theft.

    5. Re:Was this really illegel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the fucking article. You'll be arrested if you used the computer system to report that you returned the books on time, paid no fees, then sold the books.

    6. Re:Was this really illegel? by Eric604 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      These fines are not there for you to deliberate hold back a book. You should return them. It's a fine, not a price tag, you did't buy them.

    7. Re:Was this really illegel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another quality Slashdot post that contains insightful analysis, facts, and shows such elegant command of the English language!

    8. Re:Was this really illegel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not what he said. If you were to misplace several books from the library and paid the fine, then maybe like a year later, find out that they had fallen under a large and heavy piece of furniture, would it be so wrong to sell them? It is not likely the library will want the books back (and issue a refund), having replaced them already. What you pay is not a fine, its the actual value of the book posibly plus charges to cover the institutiional labor involved in acuqiring a replacement copy. There needs to be no fine, having to pay for the book is sufficent punishment.

      Oh, by the way, IAL (I am a librarian).

    9. Re:Was this really illegel? by yar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You didn't purchase the books. I'm honestly not sure if it's considered theft. But there are certainly laws that refer to legitimately required copies of materials (some parts of copyright law), and I don't think that this would fit the bill (certainly not if this was done intentionally, and I'm not sure about accidentally). Some of it depends on how your library policy reads- do they drop the situation entirely once the fine is paid?

      The library police won't be coming after you because both libraries and the police have better things to do with their time (unless this becomes a regular occurence because people think that paying the fine means they bought the book). Libraries have scarce enough resources as it is.

      People not returning books sucks for libraries. The reason fines are so high often isn't because they want the fine to act as a detriment- it's to make sure that they can get as close a replacement as possible to the missing item (which is often impossible in out of print books) and to pay for the cost of processing the book. Processing the book is not as easy as slapping on a tag and making the item available for checkout again. There's cataloging and recataloging involved.

      At any rate, libraries are a public service. Taking advantage of their services in the way the article describes, whether or not the person falsely checks in the book, is unethical if nothing else.

    10. Re:Was this really illegel? by Illserve · · Score: 1

      That poor library, they'll be doing a complete reinventory.

      Probably lost some of their best works.

    11. Re:Was this really illegel? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      That is only true in good faith cases. Lost book etc etc. If you take it with the *intent* to never bring it back that is theft.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    12. Re:Was this really illegel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is the case, why didn't he just buy the darn books first and then flog them! By your argument, this would've been the better thing to do. He wouldn't have been caught!

    13. Re:Was this really illegel? by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      That's not what I said, I clearly said deliberate. It's like stealing a car and putting some equalivant amount of cash in the owner's mailbox.

    14. Re:Was this really illegel? by cerebis · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As a digression.

      I appreicate libraries and don't condone the theft of their resources but... Libraries don't always think through their fines and charges. (or for that matter most rental businesses)

      I put it to an elderly University librarian that a $100AU maximum on late fees was stupid when the charge for a lost book was also $100AU. I asked her why she would expect anyone to return a book that hit the maximum fine. Even before the maximum, people might just decide to lump the extra cost and keep the book if the difference between the fine and the replacement charge equals the retail cost.

      I pointed out that higher level texts often retailed in the campus bookshop for over $100AU, so the replacement charge seemed even more short sighted. Why didn't their system pull up the real cost of each book to determine it and cap late fees at half the cost individually?

      She looked at me like I was evil incarnate.

    15. Re:Was this really illegel? by zotz · · Score: 1

      "People not returning books sucks for libraries. The reason fines are so high often isn't because they want the fine to act as a detriment- it's to make sure that they can get as close a replacement as possible to the missing item (which is often impossible in out of print books) and to pay for the cost of processing the book. Processing the book is not as easy as slapping on a tag and making the item available for checkout again. There's cataloging and recataloging involved."

      Interesting, so do we need a POD compulsary license for libraries which have non-replaceable books that are not returned?

      That may help alleviate the problem. In fact, would a POD compulsary license be a good thing for out of print books in general?

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    16. Re:Was this really illegel? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I guess they can just look-up his borrowing history, and see which books are really there, and which aren't. But then some libraries don't want to play Big Brother or that the real Big Brother get their records, so they might not have the history stored anywhere.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    17. Re:Was this really illegel? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      wow, AU$100 replacement fee for a book? That's pretty crazy, but then again it's a uni library, they're notorious for high fees.

      Many unis withhold your academic results if you have outstanding late fees/books though, so that might be a powerful motivator to pay the fines.

      BTW, complaining to the librarians is not the efficient way to go about it. They often don't actually set the policies, and sometimes don't get a say at all when the policies are drawn up.

      As always, when you make a complaint, you should go straight to the top. Higher even than the library manager, because the library manager always reports to someone higher up. Be polite and put it in writing, and request a formal response.

      The suits will not always take your views into account, but this way at least they know that there are dissenting views out there.

      FWIW, I work in a library.

    18. Re:Was this really illegel? by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      I was in a similar situation at my university when I lost a $35 book, and they wanted me to pay $100 for it. Instead I was able to purchase a brand new hard copy edition of the book, and give them that. I can't remember if I had to pay a restocking type fee so that they could affix their bar code, etc.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  5. Sales Tax by selectspec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Great, so we get to pay taxes on online orders because some asshole stole some library books? Instead of paying the taxes, why not just shoot the jerk. Then nobody else will try it. I buy a lot of books online and they are expensive enough as it is.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

    1. Re:Sales Tax by NewStarRising · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed Sir, You are correct.

      No murders have been commited since the first implimentation of the Death Penalty.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    2. Re:Sales Tax by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is a separate issue that the story discription didn't need to go into.

    3. Re:Sales Tax by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      That doesn't mean the death penalty won't deter other crimes. Maybe if I'm pissed enough to kill somebody, I don't give a fuck if I get the chair. On the other hand, how badly does anyone ever want to drive 55 mph in 25 zone? Badly enough to risk being broken up for their blood and organs on the first offense? Unlikely. So hey, let's bring in capital punishment for minor offenses. Run a red light? Death. Throw trash out on the highway? Death. Sell drugs to kids? Death.

    4. Re:Sales Tax by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't shoot him. I'd cut all of his fingers off with a pair of bolt cutters, one knuckle at a time, video it and put it on a website.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    5. Re:Sales Tax by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... A name like Harkobeeparolyn, I'm betting that you probably have other books about organlegging in your library. You know it's not a good idea. Be careful, someone might take you seriously.

    6. Re:Sales Tax by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with Niven that it's a bad idea. I'd rather have James Halperin's truth machine, but Niven's organ banks will have to suffice in the real world. If you don't like the rules you can always emigrate. It's only tyranny if you can't opt out of the system.

  6. now he'll have to spend the rest of his life by jacquesm · · Score: 3, Funny

    on the run for the library policemen...

    1. Re:now he'll have to spend the rest of his life by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nobody can run from Conan the Librarian!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:now he'll have to spend the rest of his life by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Oook!

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  7. Re:Where wear the library cops? by Kjuib · · Score: 3, Funny

    probably with the Spelling Police...

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  8. Bleh by Mustafu · · Score: 0

    Heh, and I used to think that knowledge was power...profitable power in this case :)

  9. ebay policy by stefanmi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are. No sales of stolen property are ever valid. A clueless person who buys stolen property at a thief's yard sale not knowing the seller stole it still is in possession of stolen property. That item can be taken from the unwitting buyer by the police and returned to the rightful owner, the person it was stolen from. If the buyer wants their money back, they have to sue the thief, which is usually a fruitless effort. So, eBay's role is that whenever they realize that property's stolen, they've gotta kill the auction in order to maintain buyer confidence in their marketplace. They don't want transactions that aren't going to work happening over their system, simply because that'd undermine the trust people have in their system.

    1. Re:ebay policy by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 0

      >That item can be taken from the unwitting buyer by the police and returned to the rightful owner, the person it was stolen from

      Interestingly, there were a couple of street markets in London that had a royal license, which meant that stolen goods bought there did not have to be returned.
      Bermondsey Market was one. I think Brick Lane/Spitalfields was another, but I'm not sure.

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  10. Thieves are stupid by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just shows how dumb and lazy most criminals are. I sold books on Amazon until 2 years ago, and I was able to get great stuff for virtually nothing jusst be forging ties at the library and getting their discards - plus buying cheaply from other sources. I never paid more than about ten cents per book. Is saving a dime worth going to jail for? (not to mention the moral compromise involved in stealing.)

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:Thieves are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the kind of thieves talked about here are a tiny minority. The real thieves, like the government, CEOs, universities, are pretty smart.

    2. Re:Thieves are stupid by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      It's not "stealing"... I'm sure the guy was eventually planning on returning the books, right?

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    3. Re:Thieves are stupid by Slashdot+is+dead · · Score: 1

      Except discards are usually in bad condition, and the stuff this guy was stealing was NEW.

    4. Re:Thieves are stupid by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      "discards are usually in bad condition..."

      Not really. I never bothered with those in bad condition. And the bottom line is I was getting some books I could sell for maybe two bucks each, but also many I was selling for around $30 each... and the very best, hundreds of them, I have still saved that are worth over $100 each. All for virtually nothing.

      Much better than some Bridget Jones book. And even if others couldn't be as lucky as I was, still even a $2 sale for a ten cent purchase is a better profit margin than even Apple has.

      --
      This space available.
  11. Mannix by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Informative


    For the less age-challenged, the Dano (sic) reference is to Hawaii Five oh. I almost wrote "Mannix", such are the problems of being over the hill. I.E., over 40.

    1. Re:Mannix by zotz · · Score: 1

      "such are the problems of being over the hill. I.E., over 40."

      One of the benefits of being over the hill is that you can still keep going even if you run out of gas.

      No wait, it doesn't quite work like that now does it?

      Columbo, Kojak, Mike Hammer, Cannon, Spenser, Baretta, McCloud, McMillan & Wife, Banacek, Barnaby Jones, Dragnet, The Equalizer, The Fugitive, The Green Hornet, Hart to Hart, Hawaii Five-O - I watched too much TV with my family growing up.

      all the best,

      drew

      http://www.magicdragon.com/UltimateMystery/tv.html

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    2. Re:Mannix by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Columbo, Kojak, Mike Hammer, Cannon, Spenser, Baretta, McCloud, McMillan & Wife, Banacek, Barnaby Jones, Dragnet, The Equalizer, The Fugitive, The Green Hornet, Hart to Hart, Hawaii Five-O.

      You apparently forgot about Kolchak, The Night Stalker. That was quirky and interesting and didn't last very long.

    3. Re:Mannix by zotz · · Score: 1

      "You apparently forgot about Kolchak, The Night Stalker. That was quirky and interesting and didn't last very long."

      Yes, Kolchak slipped my mind. I do remember enjoying at least some of those though.

      all the best,

      drew

      http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A %22drew%20Roberts%22

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
  12. "Cloacal vision" What a great review. by crovira · · Score: 4, Funny

    I almost fell of my chair laughing as my wife brought me a coffee, Thank god I wasn't drinking it at the time, because my monitor would be a mess right now.

    I bet that the possibility of writing really shitty reviews about really shitty books like that only come once in a very great while.

    The beauty of self publishing authors is that, once in a very great while someone dissapoints this reader by being as charming and erudite as their subject is pithy, most of the time I am reminded that the value of editors come as much from what they don't publish, and there for spare us from, as how well they do publish what they.

    To quote Dorothy Parker: "That's not writing, that's typing."

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:"Cloacal vision" What a great review. by Nevenmrgan · · Score: 1

      To quote Dorothy Parker: "That's not writing, that's typing."

      That would be Truman Capote on Jack Kerouac.

      Dorothy Parker said, "This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force" and, in response to an inquiry about her recent absence from the theatre, "I've been fucking busy, and vice versa."

  13. what did you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    greed is good right ? at least it worked for Kenny "Boy" Lay , George Bush, Dick Cheney, even Martha Stewart is richer from going to prison, great messages to send to the kids

    just do whatever you can to make cash, if you have to fuck over society , your kids , my kids, anyones kids, while you are doing it then who gives a shit that 30,000 sqft house and 6mpg SUV is more important

    people are products of society, if they are bad then society has failed somewhere

  14. So what exactly by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    does the theft of books from libraries have to do with:

    a> Amazon's selling of used books depriving the author's of collecting revenue.

    b> Amazon saying that it shouldn't collect state taxes because it gets no police services.

    Other than that we want to make an ad-hominem attack on Amazon and Bezos?

    Would it change what the thief did if the books showed up on EBay?

    1. Re:So what exactly by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So what exactly does the theft of books from libraries have to do with: a) Amazon's selling of used books depriving the author's of collecting revenue. b) Amazon saying that it shouldn't collect state taxes because it gets no police services.

      Not a damn thing. Like you say, the dumbass was looking for some way to denounce Amazon and Bezos. Also, he probably thought he'd finally found a good way to use the word "irony".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:So what exactly by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      Speaking of irony... Isn't it ironic that Terri Shiavo's brain condition came about because of an eating disorder...

    3. Re:So what exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah.. but her parents keep saying she "wouldn't have wanted to die of starvation!" THAT is irony..

    4. Re:So what exactly by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Isn't it ironic

      Uh no, not really...

    5. Re:So what exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what they are getting at:

      Her brain condition came from an eating disoder...

      And they are killing her by depriving her of food and water...

      Kind of amusing, in a sick and twisted way,

    6. Re:So what exactly by sarastro_us · · Score: 1

      Obviously this person doesn't even know what 'irony' really is. It's like goldy or bronzy, right?

  15. Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know why Amazon does not want to pay sales tax and its not just the small price difference of the tax or the administrative headaches. The fact is that people really really hate paying taxes to the point of irrationality. I saw the results from an e-commerce study done by MIT on people's on-line spending habits. It showed that a person would rather go with a more expensive online store in order to avoid paying sales tax. In fact, the data suggested that people would pay $5 more for the product to avoid $1 of sales tax.

    I'm not sure what the solution is, but I'm sure that Amazon knows that being tax-free means more than it seems when it comes to consumer behavior.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      .

      That's the wrong conclusion. The conclusion that can be drawn from that study, is that many people are stupid. I see them everyday. They are out there, intermingling with the population on the other half of the curve. It's frightening when you think about it -- for every smart person, there's a complementary stupid person.

      .

    2. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, some of the customers ARE just plain stupid.

      and so bezos can pull their legs, it's not amazons police service that's supposed to be paid with the sales taxes. It's the customers police protection that the cash is going to.

      "next in line pays"

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by timeOday · · Score: 1
      It showed that a person would rather go with a more expensive online store in order to avoid paying sales tax. In fact, the data suggested that people would pay $5 more for the product to avoid $1 of sales tax.
      I think it's because people hait bait-and-switch. Many online stores don't let you see the real price (including shipping and any taxes) until after you've taken the time to enter a lot of personal information. Only then, finally, do you know what the deal really is.

      Personally I'd be much happier if they simply let you enter your zip code once to show accurate, complete prices throughout the site.

    4. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dislike paying sales tax. But not to that point. I like the pricegrabber Bottom Line approach... whomever has got the best total with tax (if applicable) and shipping included will probably get my business.

    5. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by G4from128k · · Score: 1

      I think it's because people hait bait-and-switch. Many online stores don't let you see the real price (including shipping and any taxes) until after you've taken the time to enter a lot of personal information. Only then, finally, do you know what the deal really is.

      You are partially right. The data also showed that people avoided shipping fees, too. But they were only willing to pay, IIRC, $1.40 to avoid $1 of those bait-and-switch shipping costs. Perhaps its a matter of expectations. On the one hand, people expect to pay some shipping costs, but may jump to a more expensive retailer if that retailer promises "free shipping" or if the low-cost retailer has excessive, hidden, shipping costs. On the other hand, people don't expect to pay sales tax and always jump to another, often more expensive, retailer when faced with paying sales tax.

      Personally I'd be much happier if they simply let you enter your zip code once to show accurate, complete prices throughout the site.

      I agree 110%. Some retailers do a good job of this and I tend to use them more. Curiously, in my experience, Amazon does not do a good job on this where the order is being routed to one of Amazon's partners.

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    6. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Although I wouldn't put up with a $5/$1 difference, there is a point to paying more for shipping than is saved in sales tax: the money goes to a (presumably honest) packager or shipper instead of a politician who will use the money to extort more money from me. This is a political decision made by someone whose vision extends beyond range-of-the-moment.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:Amazon knows that people hate sales tax by RKBA · · Score: 1

      And that is also why I purchase everything I possibly can (including couches and other large items as well as electronics, etc) via the Internet from states other than California.

      I once saved about $200 by having a computer shipped from a store in Los Angeles to an Arizona "Suite" address, and then forwarded to me back in California - and the $200 savings was *after* paying the additional shipping cost!

  16. Re:Go Bezos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HEY! I'm in a Vegitative State, you Insensitive Clod (TM)!

  17. Re:Go Bezos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Massachusetts?

  18. Re:Where wear the library cops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But where do the grammar nazis fit in?

  19. RTFA by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    "According to Jim Strovink, a sheriff's office spokesman, Gray would check out books, then tap into the library computer system and record them as returned."

    IANAL, but that sure sounds like stealing to me.

    The answers to your questiones are easily found by clicking the link to the Page that has much of the information on it.

    This is nothing like the RIAA. This is a man stealing books and selling them.

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
    1. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, he actually violated personal trust to get the stolen goods. That's nothing like how movies get onto the file sharing networks.

      And besides, me and my classmates and all my friends don't steal library books. So we have no use for this particular type of stealing. Why that's just criminal behavior! People could lose their jobs and not be able to make a living.

  20. Re:Go Bezos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a teacher pretty much beat me up in first grade because a kid near me was talking and she thought it was me. If she is alive today she would have to be about 85 and in a wheel chair but it wouldn't stop me from pushing her over today if I saw her.

  21. At least they're reading by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look on the bright side, it's nice to see that people are reading!

  22. How 'bout Blockbuster... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe it'd be legal to do this with Blockbuster DVDs. After all, there aren't any late fees with Blockbuster.

    1. Re:How 'bout Blockbuster... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 0

      Not technically, but if you keep whatever you rented for over two weeks, you're going to have to buy it. If you choose not to, you're not going to be able to rent anything again.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    2. Re:How 'bout Blockbuster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mental force is weak on this one....

    3. Re:How 'bout Blockbuster... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Wow. Trying to come up with some idiotic way to call me dumb because I proved a point? Maybe you just shouldn't wake up in the morning.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    4. Re:How 'bout Blockbuster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, he was being sarcastic. And you completely missed the point and started explaining!

    5. Re:How 'bout Blockbuster... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      My apologies. I got the point, I was just saying that in response to something someone else said, not directed at the main topic.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  23. Doesn't surprise me by evilviper · · Score: 1

    It doesn't surprise me at all. I buy from Amazon.com resellers commonly, and everything usually works out fine. However, on a couple of occasions, I have recieved cheap imported pirated DVDs. Complaining on /. is more useful than contacting Amazon.com :-)

    Even if you explain, in-detail, what evidence you have that a product is illegal, the only response you'll ever get is an apology that you didn't recieve what you wanted (!!!) and an offer to refund your money if you return the item.

    They don't want to know anything about illegal activity on their site. They'd rather refund you money so you'll be quiet, and they can ignore it.

    Amazon isn't nearly as bad as eBay when it comes to illegal activities (in my experience) but it's certainly not good, and how they (don't) deal with it is the real problem.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Doesn't surprise me by bani · · Score: 1

      isnt this what the RIAA is for? it would be nice to see the RIAA beat up on real criminals for a change, and not college students.

    2. Re:Doesn't surprise me by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I hope that they're at least tracking complaints against stores and banninating frequent offenders.

      If your complaint doesn't come with, "Oh, we're so sorry, we'll call the police immediately," it may be because they're worried about people with a grudge. That doesn't make ignoring illegal activity through the site right, but it doesn't seem entirely unreasonable to wait for a second or third complaint before taking serious action. And they're probably not going to tell you if you're the first, third, or thousandth complaint.

      Out of curiosity, have you ever found that some of these retailers disappear from Amazon's site? Even if they do it's not evidence of bannination so much as criminals simply moving on, but still, I'd like to think that Amazon isn't completely ignoring illegal activity. It's bad for business: some people are already reluctant to use eBay because they're afraid of getting in trouble.

    3. Re:Doesn't surprise me by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If your complaint doesn't come with, "Oh, we're so sorry, we'll call the police immediately," it may be because they're worried about people with a grudge.

      I understand, and wasn't expecting any such action. If they even acknowledged what I said about illegal activity, I'd assume they are doing something... Instead, they completely ignore what I've said, and talk about it like a simple return. They've never asked for additional about the illegal products, which no doub would be very useful to them if they were doing anything about it.

      Out of curiosity, have you ever found that some of these retailers disappear from Amazon's site?

      Amazon is made-up of so many different resellers that I wouldn't likely notice if one disappeared. I am watching those I've had complaints about, and they are still selling on Amazon.

      Only advice I can offer, is read their feedback... Most of it is probably their friends who bought $1 items just so they could get a good rating, and it's a hassle for customers to give feedback, so if they do, it's probably because something is very wrong.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  24. Re:Where wear the library cops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    right next to the english snobs

  25. Boats and Bridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You mean like this one that I just paid $999.99 cash for, and will be delivered next Tuesday?

    The gentleman who sold it to me, never did catch his name, said he could also get me a deal on a famous bridge.

  26. A.G. says Bezos misinterpreted them... by Qubit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although Bezos claimed that the AG "is the same organization that from time to time has advocated charging public libraries royalties on books they loan out," (from news.com.com)

    the A.G. website has a slightly different story. Apparently the A.G. did investigate government-sponsored royalties, but funding issues and higher-priority concerns for the A.G. have halted their efforts.

    I find it interesting that the A.G. promotes such a system, described as "...a small government-funded royalty paid to authors of books borrowed from libraries." I mean, how could you determine who gets royalties without keeping track of how many times each item gets checked out? Wouldn't that raise serious privacy concerns, not to mention issues of fraud and checkout-padding for certain books?

    And then who gets to put media in the library? I mean I could put together some pamphlets about linux or FOSS, and then give them to my local library to put on the shelf. If my friends and I check them out (for free) every few days, we can get money back, right?

    What would we do with websites? People coming into the library are increasingly doing so to access the Internet (especially in lower-income areas where most people do not have access at home). If someone does research online and finds good information on Wikipedia.org, shouldn't Wikipedia get some money for that? Who is to say that Britannica deserves royalties for its 3year-old Encyclopedia but Wikipedia doesn't deserve them for its own upkeep of hardware and bandwidth?

    If this happens I can see people forming new "free libraries" -- not free for borrowing, but free from any monitoring or recording of who checked out what, when. I thought up a couple of neat ways to do this a while back as a way to 'get around' terms in the PATRIOT Act -- generally including public/private keypairs and money held in escrow (in the event that the materials were not returned). It would be a shame if people felt forced to go out and implement something like this.

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:A.G. says Bezos misinterpreted them... by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I find it interesting that the A.G. promotes such a system, described as "...a small government-funded royalty paid to authors of books borrowed from libraries." I mean, how could you determine who gets royalties without keeping track of how many times each item gets checked out? Wouldn't that raise serious privacy concerns, not to mention issues of fraud and checkout-padding for certain books?

      Libraries care about customer service. Maybe not as much as Borders and Barnes and Noble, but their mission is to serve a community, and every few years they need to get that community to vote on bond issues to pay for new and updated facilities, not to mention employee salaries. You bet your life that libraries keep track of what books are being checked out, what books seem to always be on hold, etc. It helps determine what books they need more copies of, and to anticipate demand for new releases.

      That being said, it would be silly, for many of the reasons you mention, to attach royalties to books checked out of the library. Like music, only the most recent books and the best selling series are in enough demand to make the extra bookkeeping worth it. In fact, its only the music where I see this extra accounting being worthwhile, since it is trivial to check out a CD, rip it to MP3, and return it the next day.

      Libraries also know that their customers are worried about the PATRIOT act and have other privacy concerns. Our local library now has a policy that customers are linked to books in the database for as short a period as possible - namely, for as long as I have the book checked out or a fine due on a late book. So, now you have a little extra incentive to pay those $.05 late fees.

  27. Re:Go Bezos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anything I can do to not give the League Of People In Vegetative States (AKA the California State Legislature) any tax money is fine by me.

    With the Terry Schiavo affair still on first page news, aren't such jokes a tad tasteless? You didn't make any airplane jokes after 911, or flood/perfect wave jokes after the tsunami either!

  28. What is Amazon's fair share of sales tax? by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    well, some of the customers ARE just plain stupid.

    Agreed! And a smart business gives its customers what they want, even if that is stupid.

    and so bezos can pull their legs, it's not amazons police service that's supposed to be paid with the sales taxes. It's the customers police protection that the cash is going to.

    You don't think local retailer get any benefit from police protection? I would imagine that crime against tax-paying retailers is a big deal, too. Armed robbery, shoplifting, embezzlement aren't crimes against customers. Amazon gets no benefit from police protection against crimes against retailers. In fact, it would be in Amazon's interests if local retailers become more frequent targets of crime as that would drive more customers to Amazon.

    Sales tax pays for other services that a local retailer benefits from such as tourism promotion, local festivals, parking (if not metered), and downtown rejuvenation projects. One can even argue that sales taxes for stadiums are, at least a partially, for the benefit of local businesses that get a boost from tourism. If local governments stopped maintaining the infrastructure of the downtown and shopping areas, that would hurt local retailers and help Amazon.

    You are right that sales tax does pay for services that go to the customer, but its not 100%. Some fraction of the sales tax subsidizes local retailers abilities to do business and attract customers. I can see why Amazon would not want to fund the competition, especially as Amazon (and its employees) have no vote in local elections.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  29. Yes, Jeff, you do get police services by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The police help maintain law and order. That way, it's easier for me to go out into the world and earn a living without having the double duty of helping to protect my town. That's how I was able to afford that $500 vacuum cleaner from your website, dumbass.

    1. Re:Yes, Jeff, you do get police services by ClipDude · · Score: 1

      When you order off of Amazon, do you have to pay Washington sales tax? (I don't think so, but I honestly don't know for sure, since I've never actually bought anything from there.) If not, then it is only fair that Amazon purchases be taxed by the buyer's jurisdiction.

      As a side note, some stores in Washington will cover the sales tax of their Oregonian customers, if we show identification, since Oregon does not have a sales tax.

      --

      The DMCA--for corporations, the best copyright law money can buy.
    2. Re:Yes, Jeff, you do get police services by ClipDude · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, sales tax also goes to fund the educational systems which teach many people how to read. (There wouldn't be much a market for books without widespread literacy.)

      --

      The DMCA--for corporations, the best copyright law money can buy.
    3. Re:Yes, Jeff, you do get police services by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      The police help maintain law and order. That way, it's easier for me to go out into the world and earn a living without having the double duty of helping to protect my town. That's how I was able to afford that $500 vacuum cleaner from your website, dumbass.

      Actually, he was stating he didn't get police services in North Carolina, so why should he do the work of collecting North Carolina's taxes for them. Jeff and Amazon are in Washington and they collect WA state sales tax from all WA residents. They get police and fire services, their employees use public transit, the school system, etc. They collect sales taxes for WA and pay business taxes to WA.

      OTOH, it's often cheaper for WA residents to shop at other e-tailers with locations outside the state, or go to a local "bricks and mortar" retailer who may have a similar price, as they'll pay sales tax anyway and they get instant gratification with no shipping costs or shipping wait.

      - Greg

    4. Re:Yes, Jeff, you do get police services by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I've only paid shipping (unless I've gotten free shipping) and no sales taxes.

    5. Re:Yes, Jeff, you do get police services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the poster understands that you fucking dumbass.

      What he's saying is that Bezos does indeed get "police services" from other states by the very fact that there are people that can live in comfort in those states and buy his products. As someone else pointed out, the sales tax also pays for schools and libraries which teaches/encourages people to read.

      I am not defending the low level merits of either argument... but Bezos' is just as a pointless. It is just a cool sounding soundbyte for an interview. In the end he is a businessman that knows that his customers hate the idea of paying Sales Tax for mail order items. It is something that we have done for some many years that people consider it a de facto right... Bezos' little "police services" claim is an nice sounding, though irrelevant and grossly oversimplified false rationalization that works well in an interview or press release.

  30. Saw it on the news. by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should only give network acess to full-time library workers.

    --
    In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
  31. Re:Go Bezos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9/11 was an international incident killing thousands of people and disrupting the lives of millions.

    Terry Schiavo is a domestic squabble that has somehow been escalated to the point where some members of the family feel they should appear before the supreme court.

    Move along now.

  32. A bigger operation by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    There was something similiar which happened at
    Microsoft a few months back.

  33. Well maybe Bezos will get police service now... by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    or do the police serve subpoenas?

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  34. maybe ebay isn't the problem ... by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    My dad was a paratrooper in Alaska about 25 years ago, and says this kind of thing happened all the time -- a couple of supply sergeants stole literally half the stores, transferring stuff between them to make accounts add up any time there was an inspection. Another time, my dad borrowed a lock from another guy for his locker, and the guy opened it up and took all his stuff (it's possible he was a bit naive back then, huh?).

    Anyway, the way I read this, it's probably the military that's rampant with thieves -- not too surprising for the world's largest and best funded bureaucracy. It's possible that eBay aided the process, but I bet it simply put all the thieves into a searchable database and made the problem a little more visible.

    Not that I know shit about shit, as my dad would say. What do you think?

  35. Authors Guild re: Used Book sales by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

    As an author, I am tempted to concur with the Author's Guild re: used book sales.

    As a voracious reader, I very much like buying used books at reduced cost. (I also buy many for reference when doing research for my own writing.)

    My libertarian leanings also give me pause at the notion of restricting free enterprise and doing what one wishes with one's own property (selling used books).

    My capitalist leanings (okay, greed, profiteering, whatever) give me pause because, after all, I write for fun AND profit.

    Any other authors here with an opinion?

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    1. Re:Authors Guild re: Used Book sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking moron.

      a) You agree with the guild, and then give 3 statements. 2 of those would support the Amazon position. Only the last one supports the guild

      b) You haven't a fucking clue about what is libertarian and capitalist. There is nothing inherently libertarian about selling property I own. That is in fact the fundamental of capitalism.

      c) You don't understand capitalism... you only understand monopolistic corrupted capitalism (and why wouldn't you, you are involved in publishing). Read an elementary book on capitalism. In an ideal system based on capitalism, increased competition in a market naturally drives down profits.. Greed, and profiteering are externalities that can damage capitalism only through outside manipulation from organizations like guilds and lobbying.
      An option to buy books at low cost is due to two things: a) books are overpriced (a lot of books that have been on the market for years but I am interested in cost 0.25% of my yearly take home pay). This was unheard of 40 years ago.

      A thriving used market (like flea markets, garage sales, online book stores) should not hurt a healthy market for new goods. That is because the value add of buying the new good should offset the benefit of either waiting or buying something else used. If Amazon is damaging your profits it is either a) a healthy sign that capitalism is working and that there is a natural downward pressure on your profits, b) signs of problems in your new book market that need to be fixed if you, and the current "establishment" in that market want to survive. (As with all complex things it is probably a little of both)

      Your protectionist behavior is only natural of course, but it won't save you in the long run.

      Believe it or not, greed and corruption are the not ideals or fundamentals of something you can call in "capitalism". They are simply greed and corruption.

      You are scum.

    2. Re:Authors Guild re: Used Book sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I get it, the first sentence was meant as another facet (As an author), not a summarizing statement.

      Your post still displays mostly ignorance so I don't take back anything I say other than item a).

    3. Re:Authors Guild re: Used Book sales by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Well, since you are clearly a pitiful, disturbed individual who thinks life has dealt you a raw deal, I pity you but place no value on your opinion.

      My you find healing for whatever pain drives you to such vitriol.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
  36. Oregon sales tax by ClipDude · · Score: 1
    An Oregon library worker was arrested after selling at least $10,000 worth of stolen library books, CDs and videotapes online in the past six months. [. . .] Bezos also once told angry booksellers there's no reason why Amazon should have to collect sales taxes, arguing that Amazon gets no police services from other states.

    Of course, Oregon does not have a sales tax. (We're weird that way.)

    --

    The DMCA--for corporations, the best copyright law money can buy.
  37. I have a question... by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1

    Why is a college president reading I Am Charlotte Simmons, a book about the sex life of a college co-ed? I think the perv-o-meter just hit eleven.

    1. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, exactly, do you consider this "perverted"?

    2. Re:I have a question... by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      Why is a college president reading I Am Charlotte Simmons, a book about the sex life of a college co-ed?

      Two reasons: 1) It's written by the well known and respected Tom Wolfe -- it's not a sleaze book, but an attempt to seriously address the subject.

      2) Co-eds are ~50% of the student population. Lots of problems on campuses (unwanted pregnancies, unethical relationships between professors and students, etc.) originate from their sexual activities. Wouldn't be his job to understand the situation better?

    3. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because the book isn't about the sex life of a college co-ed; it's a fiction about what the author seems to see as the decline of college life in 21 century America.

  38. Bezos or Bozos? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Bezos also once told angry booksellers there's no reason why Amazon should have to collect sales taxes, arguing that Amazon gets no police services from other states."

    Yeah right. I guess I shouldn't pay taxes because I don't have any kids in school, I'm healthy, I walk to work. My apartment isn't on fire. What an ass. Heeeyy...wait a minute! Maybe I shouldn't pay any taxes! Sorry guys, If you want to operate here and benefit from our people, these are the rules. Just like building codes and health codes. If you don't like it, just close up shop. Someone else will pop up. Quit being such a crybaby, and simply udjust your prices accordingly. Let the voters deicde how much tax you(we) pay. That's the way it's supposed to be!

    thankyouverymuch

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Bezos or Bozos? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd agree except for the fact that more than half of the politicians are crooks and more than half of the civil servants are lazy, over-paid fools.

      If it were a fair system, I'd have the option of saying, "No thanks. I don't want to buy the services you are selling." Tax is no different than paying protection money. I'll be physically punished if I decide not to.

      The Government is the only body allowed to shoot me 'legally'. And they have nearly all the guns anyway. It's a total racket, and voluntarily paying taxes and pretending that it's the right thing to do is almost entirely an act of denial. The sad truth is that the Government is a sham designed to dull-down, enslave and bleed the populace.

      An interesting note. . . In my country, (Canada), one of the biggest personal tax-dodgers (to the tune of millions), is the current prime minister. Hipocricy? You bet. --And nobody has the balls to do anything about it. At the same time, on parliament hill last year a cadre of the highest ranking ministers granted themselves a pay raise putting their take home pay at over $100,000 each. There was no way to vote against this.

      People who proudly pay tax are self-deluding chumps who don't want to admit they're being raped.


      -FL

    2. Re:Bezos or Bozos? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If one votes for a crook, what does that say about the voter?

      And nobody has the balls to do anything about it.

      Least of all the people who re-elect him, or support his political party.

      There was no way to vote against this.

      What? Are you under a dictatorship and nobody told me? Can't you vote them out of office? If you or your neighbors won't do that, then how can you possibly blame your gov't? I've been on this tirade for a while now, but nobody will believe me when I tell them that they do have the power, and they continue to complain. My ongoing question is, how do you spend so much time defending your democracies and then continue to vote for people you hate? This is madness. Gore Vidal had a write up on this, and he nailed it to the tee. I can't find the specific article, and it's pure flamebait in all its glory. But many times truth=flamebait.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Bezos or Bozos? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You definitely should not pay taxes for the state to indoctrinate someone else's spawn. Tax-funded education (other than military academies like West Point) is monumental theft providing a lousy "service" enriching foul unions.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:Bezos or Bozos? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      You definitely should not pay taxes for the state to indoctrinate someone else's spawn.

      I kinda think of it as a weak insurance policy in the hopes he would be educated enough to slightly reduce his chances of becoming a criminal.

      --
      What?
  39. Re:dumber than a bag of hamsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those silly brits

  40. Re:Go Bezos! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    *shrug*

    I have the world's darkest sense of humor, so "tasteless" is a thing I don't care about. Being a vast misanthrope doesn't help matters. Tasteless is a word, in my not so humble opinion, used by wweak people.

    And, actually, I DID make jokes on 9/11 and after the tsunami.

  41. punish him, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he should be strongly punished, but I will also point out that for nearly TWO YEARS, I was checking the dumpster of the Eden Prairie branch of the Hennepin County MN public library because I noticed one day that it was overflowing with books.

    I found, checking probably 2-3 times per month, that almost every time I checked, there were bags upon bags of books, even neatly sorted so they weren't mixed in with general kleenex or popcans. They were generally organized by section, so I could tell within a few moments of opening the newest bag if I was going to find a bag full of bodice-rippers, westerns, or nonfiction.

    Now, these were *not* the worn, torn, and bedraggled books you might think. Nope. There were some of course, but probably 80%+ were in good or better condition. Not just books, either. I got the collector's edition (2 disc) DVD of Tron, the latest CD of Sixpence none the richer, etc - all from the dumpster, week after week after week. Hundreds of kids books every week.

    It got so bad that my spouse would get mad as she saw me pull a shopping bag or box from the trunk of my car - "Dumpster diving again? What are we going to do with all the books you're bringing home?"

    I was a little irked as a taxpayer that thousands of $$ were being so casually tossed out, despite it being for my own personal gain. I left a message for the local TV station's investigative reporter (KMSP9) who apparently didn't feel it was worth following up.

    As I said, this went on for 2 years.
    Finally, I saw that the local boy scouts were having a book drive, so I called the director for the library, ended up getting shunted to the PR person, who SWORE there was no such thing happening. Then she said it was because
    EP just moved into a new library, so her first line of explanation was that they were culling. Culling when they were moving into a building 2x the size? And NEW books? WTF? As the discussion progressed, she began to get more irate that I simply refused to accept the 'party line', and finally she claimed that I would get a call to see if the boy scouts would accept the books before any books were tossed out.

    18 months later, I haven't gotten a single call. Meanwhile, the flow of books has 'mysteriously' stopped.

    So I have thousands of "library" marked books that I'd like to give away - so am I going to be prosecuted?

  42. Illusions. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    What? Are you under a dictatorship and nobody told me? Can't you vote them out of office?

    No. The voting system is rigged at the psychological level.

    When people are a bunch of mind-controlled brain slugs, then it is very easy to make them 'choose' that which is not good for them. Controlling populations through a host of on-going and very effective techniques, from drugs and television and religion, to the very manner in which society itself has been built, establishes the illusion of a democratic system when really nothing could be further from the truth. --And when mind-control is not enough, then there are always ways of ensuring that the systems give up the desired results. The last U.S. election offered prime example of some of these methods. (Unless one is of of the camp that no mis-doings were in evidence.)

    Democracy is an illusion. People are cattle. Yes, it's true that on a deep level, this is as they choose to be, but it doesn't make me content to play along just because my soul-sleeping neighbors are willing to be slaughtered.

    I'll keep yelling about this, but I'll be abandoning ship when the critical time comes, and everybody left aboard can drown as they will.

    Christ was quoted as saying once, "Wide is the road that leads to destruction, and thousands walk it every day. Narrow is the path that leads to Life, and few follow it." (Or words to that effect.)


    -FL

    1. Re:Illusions. . . by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Democracy is an illusion. People are cattle. Yes, it's true that on a deep level, this is as they choose to be, but it doesn't make me content to play along just because my soul-sleeping neighbors are willing to be slaughtered. Emphasis mine.

      Glad to see that you understand, along with a few others that put up some disagreement. This is really my whole point. My whole tirade is more directed at those who continue to believe in their system.

      I'll keep yelling about this, but I'll be abandoning ship when the critical time comes, and everybody left aboard can drown as they will.

      That is exactly what I have done, and am doing. I've taken solice in that I'm minimizing my support for such systems. It's useless to argue with people who simply wno't hear you. My somewhat less kind words I have for them are, "Fine, then you can rot and die in your own feces. Just keep your distance...please." So, now I'm here, throwing out occassional rants to the drones.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Illusions. . . by spamfiltertest · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, for the most part... Now the question becomes how do we break out of that pattern? I agree that democracy is an illusion, and that people are cattle, but how does society break away from what has become the norm? With all the "laws" in place to make sure the system keeps running in the hands of the few, it's hard for the system to be changed. Then, the problem with changing the system is that the individual pushing for change is looked at as a loon or some nut. I fear that society has gotten to the point where this is going to be the method of our destruction with little hope to change our path.

  43. Don't Forget by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Krychek, from The X Files. He was rogue FBI, so I guess that counts as a cop show.

  44. No sales tax here. by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    I hate sales tax and I like living here where there isn't any. You buy something for $99.95; give the clerk a hundred dollar bill; and get back a nickle and a 'thank you'.

    To me sales taxes will always be associated with the unlamented sleazy California politician Willie Brown. In 1992, California's government ran out of money and had to resort to issueing 'registered warrants' instead of paychecks to government workers. Willie Brown, then the Speaker of the CA Legislature, 'proposed' raising the sales tax from 4.5% to 6%, (which was a nearly 35% arbitrary increase) and it was instantly approved. Then this weird schmuck Willie Brown gets on television and says, "What kind of person don't wanna pay two pennie to help the poor?"
    Since California was in one of its periodic slumps and there was no growth in the economy that year, all the revenue that got transferred to the new sales tax came from depressed retail sales. Six months later, I read a interview with the California state economist where he noted that "a 1.5% rise in the sales tax resulted in a 17% decrease in sales tax revenue".
    I nearly fell out of my chair. Was this guy so dumb that he thought that raising the tax rate from 4.5 to 6 was only a 1.5% increase? And since there was no growth in the economy and a sales tax increase, how could there not be a decrease in general sales when the price of everything went up to pay for the tax increase?
    Anyway, I just glad to leave California. If your not a millionaire and in love, the place just sucks.

    Getting down with Willie Brown! Willie Brown got a closet full of $1000 suits that's bigger than your $1000 a month studio apartment. Between Willie Brown and Jerry Brown, it's no wonder that the people of Oakland need so much crack to escape the reality of their pathetic government.
    God, I am so happy to not live in California.

  45. Theft in rare books is so common by hotspotbloc · · Score: 2
    Back in the late '80s I was asked by a NFP group to catalog their collection, about 6k of rare books dating back to the 1500's but most from the 1700 to 1900 and scan some of their more interesting ones.

    As a rule on such jobs I always required a staff member with me at all times and required that my bags (computer, scanner, etc) be inspected at the entrance and the exit. True CYA. The first day I went to inspect the collection it was clear it had been "groomed". Telltall dust lines in drawers that should not have had been openned in years lead to the possiblity many books were missing. I quickly told them I had no interest in stepping into their mess and advised them to call the Boston PD right way.

    My guess was someone was grabbing what look valuable and didn't know how to cover their tracks. It was also likely that person was still there.

    The sad thing was there were a number of books I would've looked to have copies of, but it never happened.

    Atleast some places, like the BLP, has very good security of the rare books. Once you get known as a researcher their they were pretty cool. Still strick, but still cool. Of course this was before the BPL was gutted. I fear in ten years it will a Starbuck's and Border's.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  46. Heh. That's funny. by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I had no idea that's what did her in. A quick googling revealed that before her collapse she was trying to survive on liquids alone.

    At least in the end she got what she wanted. 20 years worth of liquid subsistence.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent