Slashdot Mirror


William Shatner Pitches 'Starfleet Academy' Show

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that William Shatner recently pitched an 'Academy' show to Paramount. The series would feature teen versions of the Classic Star Trek characters Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and be set at Starfleet Academy. The studio turned Shatner down, but he's not letting go of the idea: Pocket Books has asked him to write a two-novel series based on the 'Starfleet Academy' concept. Also, Shatner apparently went over the head of Trek head honcho Rick Berman to pitch his idea straight to the head of Paramount - maybe after Enterprise ends and Berman leaves the franchise, the studio will be more inclined to listen to Shatner?"

16 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. Love his style by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You gotta give Shatner credit for totally dissing Berman like that. :-)

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  2. God love that manwhore! by Nijika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think Shatner is by far, by far, my favorite Trekker. He's got a sense of humor about himself and his work, yet he's not even remotely afraid to take chances.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:God love that manwhore! by hawk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, but how else do you get someone to take an ongoing role which is *designed* as a parody of himself? (Boston Legal)

      hawk

    2. Re:God love that manwhore! by Politburo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      See: Adam West, Family Guy.

  3. Let it die. by nberardi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think, as sad as it might be, that StarTrek has really come to an end. It has had a good 50 some odd years of episodes. Let it die with at least some dignity.

  4. I like the idea...not the setting.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the idea would be better served in the pre/post TNG/DS9 time frame and with new characters....perhaps with camio here or there from the established charaters.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  5. Star Trek 90210 by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a horrible idea. Just what would be needed to completely kill off the franchise. How about a whole show full of Wesley Crusher teen angst in a Federation uniform.
    Visually it would be hard to jive with the old series, and having actors who are trying to potray the old characters might lead to pure campiness.
    Ok so now everyone can tell how it would be great if they did it right - but come on people, you KNOW they wouldn't do it right.
    I'm just hoping whatever new series comes out has Shatner singing the theme song. Hell, just have him sing the lyrics to the orignal theme from the '60s series.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
    1. Re:Star Trek 90210 by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, they'd botch it. Not gonna argue with you on that one.

      I agree that trying to make the old characters synch up would be hard. Star Trek is never about the 22nd/23rd/24th centuries; it's always about today. So having "young" Kirk have more mature attitudes (by our standards) than "old" Kirk would be disconcerting.

      Besides, they'd have the same problem that they did on Enterprise: you can't place a character in real jeopardy if you already know that they survive. That's supposedly why they renamed T'Pau to T'Pol. Personally, I'd have loved to have seen the great leader of Vulcan as a young woman, to see what made her great, and screw the suspense factor, but they saw it otherwise. And then wrote absolutely nothing interesting for her to do.

      Still, I like the idea of setting a series at Star Fleet Academy. There are a billion ways to do it wrong, and only a few to do it right, but there are some good opportunities there. Just like both Voyager and Enterprise had good opportunities that rotted behind unimaginative plotting, ratings-grabbing, and a failure to understand what Trek really is.

      So, sadly, as a Trek fan from before the proliferation, I gotta agree: let it rest.

  6. Re:Tekwars by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if Shatner will use the same ghost writer this time?

    So long as he doesn't sing the theme song.

    Seriously though, I'm glad he went over that douchebag's head.

  7. You're thinking "New Shatner" by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Shatner is by far, by far, my favorite Trekker. He's got a sense of humor about himself and his work, yet he's not even remotely afraid to take chances.

    Really, I think that's a bit shortsighted. Shatner has only become that way in the last decade or so. Prior to that, he's tried to distance himself from the Trek fans as much as possible. Compared to how much he has benefited from Trek fandom, Shatner has given very little back. Contrast this with George Takei, Deforest Kelly, or Jimmy Doohan who have always been big supporters of Trek fandom. In a previous message, I talked about how Jimmy Doohan took it upon himself to use his fame to help a single fan back to health. Shatner would never do anything like this -- then or now. I'll admit that Shatner is likeable but that's been a recent thing. Read Takei's book sometime and listen to the shit that Shatner used to do. Shatner didn't even show up at Roddenberry's funeral, for chrissake!

    You're entitled to your opinion but I'm baffled how you can consider him a Trekker at all, let alone your favorite.

    GMD

    1. Re:You're thinking "New Shatner" by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
      has given very little back

      Seriously, star trek actors dont owe anyone anything. Being famous is not that great, trust me. Everyone wants to tell you what they love you, that you suck, or bask in your reflected glory. It gets OLD. You just wanna be a normal person who can goto pizza hut without a love fest from pimply teenagers.

      About ~20 years ago I was (a kid) at the San Diego wild animal park. And Richard Pryor happened to be there. Everyone was nuts over him. He was in the gift shop looking at some mugs or something and everyone was running outside telling their friends to come gawk at richard pryor buying gifts. I felt so sorry for him and I was 8 at the time.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  8. Re:Tekwars by Winkhorst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's apparently so little writing ability and creativity in Hollywood that they can't get beyond Star Trek as the only possible metaphor for space-based Sci Fi. There is an incredibly large universe out there, yet it doesn't appear to have enough room for anything other than ONE plot structure based on ONE metaphor? Here's an exercise: Create a program with the dynamism of the original Star Trek with NONE of the structural baggage. Tell me, is this really an impossible challenge?

    --
    "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  9. Re:Tekwars by mmkkbb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tell me, is this really an impossible challenge?

    Making the show is not the challenge. It's getting people to watch it that's hard. Branding power and all that. It's like Nintendo and Tetris.

    --
    -mkb
  10. Not impossible, very very simple. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only issue is that it has to be story with a clear beginning and a clear end. Just like a novel.

    The problem is that Hollywood isn't interested in that format for TV. They want it episodic so there's always room to wiggle and try to squeeze more money out of it.

    Think of it as filming a movie, in 26 blocks.

  11. Re:Tekwars by starsong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was called Firefly. They cancelled it.

    Seriously, the problem seems to be with the perceived risk. Star Trek has an established fan base, so even a very sucky new series is guaranteed at least SOME measure of support. People spending several tens of millions on a new show don't want to take risks on something unproven. It's the same reason Miss Congeniality 2 is playing down the street from me. Sequels are (perceived as) safer than originality.

  12. Re:Tekwars by Saxerman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    >>It was called Firefly. They cancelled it. >Because it sucked. This is honest opinion, not a troll or flamebait. >Every episode looked like a Mad TV or SNL spoof. It wasn't so bad that it was fit for an MST3K treatment, but it was close.

    Wow. We must not have been watching the same show. At first blush I disliked Firefly due to the "Space Western" theme as I thought it sounded rather contrived. Why would we unlock tech in space flight and colonization and yet regress technologically?

    Fortunately my friends convinced me to watch the show, and I was hooked. After I understood the story, it made perfect sense. I enjoyed how they accepted the advanced technologies of space travel but did not let them dominate the story. I enjoyed how the story stayed focused on the characters, and I especially enjoyed watching the characters and their relationships develop.

    I'm not sure why you felt Firefly seemed like a space comedy. There were certainly some very funny moments but the thrust of the series seemed to focus on the serious morale issues of working within the grey areas of the law and surviving between those groups that considered the laws absolute and the criminal elements that would rather ignore the laws completely. If anything I would think you would take exception of the melodrama, considering how you cite that grievance against the Star Trek franchise. I also agree that Star Trek was too melodramatic for my tastes, which is why I considered Firefly a welcome change. I didn't feel like the script was talking down to me and appreciate how they directly tackled hard issues like religion ("You don't 'fix' the Bible, River.") and didn't make me feel like I was being preached too.

    --

    A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.